Commonsense Gun Laws

The horrific images from the shooting at the Sandy Hook Elementary School are still seared into our minds – of six-year olds fleeing from danger, law enforcement officers overwhelmed with emotion, and parents grieving for loved ones taken from them forever.

President Obama’s powerful words after the shooting spoke directly to the soul of a nation searching for answers following another in a long line of gun-related massacres.

During my time as Mayor of Providence, one of the most difficult responsibilities I had was to meet with mothers and fathers whose children were victims of deadly gun violence. No words of mine could ever match the excruciating pain they felt.

Following this tragedy, I hosted a meeting on Capitol Hill, along with the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence and met with families whose lives have been devastated by gun violence. These were families who lost loved ones in brutal attacks at Columbine, Aurora, and Virginia Tech. I thanked them for their courage and willingness to push now for commonsense policy changes – stronger limits on assault weapons, tighter restrictions on sales of ammunition, and more thorough background checks on gun sales. But for many of the families I met with there was a larger concern – each of them have experienced the pain of not only losing a loved one, but also watching in vain as our leaders in Washington failed to take action to ensure these tragedies never happened again.

And, unfortunately, this apathy seems to be the rule rather than the exception in recent years.

Our national lawmakers have refused to act on the issue of gun safety even after every mass shooting that has taken place in recent years. There has been no serious push to reinstate the assault weapons ban that expired in 2004 or to require tougher background checks on all gun sales. And there has been no real effort in recent years to strengthen background check requirements to keep guns from ending up in the hands of criminals or individuals suffering with serious mental illness.

The tragedy in Newtown is, unfortunately, only the most recent of a long series of violent killings involving guns, but it is especially horrific because it involved the slaughter of 20 innocent children and their teachers.

It is my hope that it will mark a turning point in the debate over commonsense gun safety laws.

The response of the leaders of the National Rifle Association to the horrors of gun violence and in particular to the devastation at Sandy Hook Elementary School was to argue for more guns in schools and to use this occasion to re-state their strong opposition to any commonsense gun safety legislation.

We should move ahead to protect our children and communities from the dangers of gun violence despite strong opposition from the powerful gun lobby. While there is no perfect solution that will eliminate all gun crimes, there are many things we can do to significantly reduce the danger of guns getting into the hands of criminals and those that are seriously mentally ill, as well as restricting the sale of particularly deadly weapons and ammunition.

The fact is, we don’t need to wait for new proposals to be put forward – there are already a number of bills that I and many gun safety advocates have already co-sponsored that would provide significant changes to existing laws.

  • The Fix Gun Checks Act would ensure that anyone who should not be allowed to have a gun is listed in the national instant criminal background check system and require a background check for every firearm sale.
  • The Gun Show Loophole Closing would require background checks on any firearms sales that take place at a gun show.
  • The Stop Online Ammunition Sales Act would require in person purchases of ammunition, licensing of ammunition dealers, and reporting regarding bulk purchases of ammunition.
  • We can ban the types of devices typically used in mass shootings by passing the Large Capacity Ammunition Feeding Device Act which would achieve this and also re-enact the Assault Weapons Ban.
  • And the Fire Sale Loophole Closing Act to end the practice by which gun dealers who lose their license can convert their inventory into a “personal collection” and sell them privately.

The time for action is now. Enough is enough! We owe it to the families of all those who have lost loved ones to gun violence to do all that we can to end this human carnage. We have many good proposals pending in Congress right now. Let’s honor the memories of those who were murdered at the Sandy Hook Elementary School by taking strong action immediately.

They deserve nothing less.

**This blog was originally featured on The Huffington Post

Related posts:
  1. Sign Local Gun Control Petition Here
  2. All Guns Should Be Insured, Just Like Cars

8 responses to “Commonsense Gun Laws”

  1. jgardner

    Lanza stole the guns and then entered a place that had a 100% ban on any type of firearm. Please tell me what new, more restrictive law you could have passed that would have made any difference. Pro-tip: The AWB that expired in 2004 would not have applied to the AR-15 that was used in the shooting.

  2. Jonathan Jacobs

    A comprehensive re-evaluation of the definition of “assault weapon” would. As would a discussion oabout the reason and rationale of the second amendment. I think the congressman has brought up some very valid points and it is up to the people to now speak on behalf of our national security.

    1. jgardner

      “A comprehensive re-evaluation of the definition of “assault weapon” would.”
      Would what?

      As a side note, I hope included in this national conversation is a discussion regarding the failed “war on drugs” and the role it plays in the deaths and destruction of so many lives and families.

    2. DogDiesel

      Please point out exactly which of the Congressman’s proposals would have prevented Newtown?

  3. Jonathan Jacobs

    “Please tell me what new, more restrictive law you could have passed that would have made any difference.”
     A comprehensive re-evaluation of the definition of “assault weapon” would [have possibly made a difference]. Newtown happened. Pointing out which of the congressman’s proposals would have made a difference is not a constructive conversation. We all have to move forward. However, this constistent “why bother” mentality that fuels the conversation of those who are afraid of having to give up their guns is basically saying that living with gun violence is the price America must pay for the freedom of owning deadly weapons.

    1. DogDiesel

      Assume much? Where did I say why bother? I’m all for a discussion on working to prevent this from happening again. He’s proposing knee jerk legislation that would have had no effect and plays to his political base. We have to approach this from the point that the horse is already out of the barn.  Closing the barn door will have little effect. Everyone knows that government seizing legally purchased firearms will never pass muster with the right or left so let’s get serious about what went wrong and try and fix it. This was a crime and making law abiding citizens criminals by outlawing their weapons won’t solve anything.

    2. parared

      You are failing at logic.  Here you essentially admit that all of the leftist ‘we have to *do* something’ would not have prevented the tragedy that got you spun up, while ignoring the possibility that you might be heading in the wrong direction.  If, as you tacitly admit, the redefinition of assault rifle, the banning of scary things, the trashing of the constitution, all would not have saved one of those kids, why do you not recognize that what *would* have saved (some of) those kids would have been a single weapon in the hands of a good-guy on site.

      Do you so disdain your fellow citizens that you deny the possibility of anyone other than an ordained police officer coming to the aid of those kids?  Or are you satisfied that the principle and teachers only had their bodies to throw at that animal? 

  4. rmastel

    Yet the number of deaths attributed to alcohol, drugs, automotive, and other non-firearm related deaths, far outweigh those having anything to do with firearms. The number associated with tobacco, heart disease, and other health issues is also staggering. Stop trying to limit the rights of law abiding citizens. Focus on something that will actually make a difference like education, healthcare, and social services. Make sentencing tougher. But then I guess we would have to make sentencing tougher across the board and then politicians and their families couldn’t get off with light sentences.

Add Comment Register

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.