The 40 Hour Week vs. Corporate Stupidity


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Anyone who works in corporate America is familiar (all too familiar) with the way corporations ‘increase productivity.’  The standard method over the past 20 years has been to fire (and that is the proper word: fire) a whole bunch of workers at the bottom end, and make the survivors do the work that those fired workers have done.

In sum, the motto is “do more with less.”  Or, “here’s a butter knife. Go clear the forest.”

If you have to work 50 0r 60–or more–to get your stuff done, well, you’re part of the team. You have to pull your weight.  Complain?  Hey, you’re lucky to have a job.

And everything in those sentences has been uttered in a corporate office.  I’ve either heard them myself, or have it from very reliable sources.

I have worked both as factory labor and in corporate management. I’ve seen it from both sides.  And let me tell you: in  a large corporation, there are people who wake up every day thinking, “how can I screw (the workers) even more?”

Time was, corporations didn’t act like this. They were much smarter then. In the last 30 years, they’ve gotten progressively more either a) stupid; b) greedy; or c) both.

How so stupid?

Look, in 1926 (no typo: 1926) Henry-Freakin’-Ford gave an interview propounding virtues of the 40-hour, 5-day week. He figured out that it was the best thing for business.

And this is Henry-Freakin’-Ford–yes, that Henry Ford, admirer of Herr Hitler and loather of communists (both historical facts. Look it up. I’m through spoon-feeding history. Prove me wrong, I dare you.)

“…The harder we crowd business for time, the more efficient it becomes.  The more well-paid leisure workmen get, the greater become their wants. These wants soon become needs. Well-managed business pays high wages and sells at low prices. Its workmen have the leisure to enjoy life and the wherewithal with which to finance that enjoyment…” (Interview, 1926. Henry Ford: Why I Favor Five Days’ Work With Six Days’ Pay)

That is Henry-Freakin’-Ford.

So tell me, why does it make sense to work people like robots? Or like wage slaves?

Answer, it doesn’t.  This view of H-F-F became so entrenched, that it was simply not questioned for a good 50 years.  Or, until about the time St. Ronnie became president and decided it was time to bust unions–the former union president himself. Seems unions were OK when they protected him, but not so good once he became management.  Nothing worse than someone who forgets where they came from.

So, yes, corporations have gotten stupid. And lazy. Don’t work smarter, just work more. Except study after study after study has shown that, after about three weeks of working 50 hours, you’re not getting any more done than you were in 40.  So you burn yourself out for no gain.

H-F-FL: …”It is not necessary to bring in sentiment at all in this whole question of leisure for workers. Sentiment has no place in industry. In the olden days those who thought that leisure was harmful usually had an interest in the products of industry…”

IOW, H-F-F was calling out lies currently being spewed that the lower class (that would be the 99%) has become morally degenerate, and needs to be put in workhouses again.  It was a lie in the 1800s, Henry Ford realized it was a lie in the 1900s, and it remains a lie in the 2000s.

And, BTW: cutting a bunch of workers gooses the profitability of a corp for a few quarters. IOW, long enough to make sure the guys doing the cutting get their fat multi-comma bonus.  IOW, they have “an interest in the products of industry.”

We face 10% unemployment in this country. Hire some people. Cut the hours of those “lucky enough to have a job.”  More people will have money to spend. They will have the leisure to spend it.

That’s how you stimulate the economy.

Cicilline Calls for House Passage of Buffett Rule Bill


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Congressman David Cicilline has joined the Buffett Rule movement, calling on Speaker John Boehner to pass the House version of Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse’s Paying A Fair Share Legislation.

“Under current tax laws, working men and women may be asked to pay a higher percentage of their income in taxes than wealthy individuals, many of whom derive a significant portion of their earnings from capital gains,” Cicilline wrote to Boehner. “Although there are many issues on which we may disagree, surely both Republicans and Democrats must acknowledge that there is something wrong with a system that asks a Fortune 500 CEO to pay a lower tax rate than his or her secretary.”

The House version of the bill is being sponsored by Rep. Tammy Baldwin, D- Wisconsin. In a conference call yesterday with Sens. Whitehouse and Chuck Schumer, D-NY, she said her constituents believe “our tax system rigged against middle class families and quite frankly it is.”

The Senate is expected to vote on the bill April 16. Yesterday on the conference call Schumer and Whitehouse said Democrats hope to pick up a few Republican votes. No date has been set yet for a House vote on the bill, where its chances of passing are less optimistic.
Here’s the full text of Cicilline’s letter to Boehner:

Dear Speaker Boehner,
For much of the past year, public attention has been focused on the issues that divide us as Democrats and Republicans as well as the partisan tactics and extreme rhetoric that has been used in pursuit of conflicting priorities. But at a time when our economic recovery is still struggling to take hold, and with my home state of Rhode Island now experiencing the second highest unemployment rate in the country, working families want to see Washington put aside partisan rhetoric in favor of pragmatic solutions to the challenges we face.

One of the most urgent areas of concern lies in reforming our tax structure. As you know, under current tax laws, working men and women may be asked to pay a higher percentage of their income in taxes than wealthy individuals, many of whom derive a significant portion of their earnings from capital gains. Although there are many issues on which we may disagree, surely both Republicans and Democrats must acknowledge that there is something wrong with a system that asks a Fortune 500 CEO to pay a lower tax rate than his or her secretary.

Last week, President Barack Obama reiterated his call for Congress to institute the “Buffett Rule.” My fellow Rhode Islander, Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), has introduced legislation in the U.S. Senate, that would ensure multi-million dollar earners pay at least 30% of their income in taxes, which would ensure parity with taxes imposed on middle class families.    The Senate has scheduled a vote on this legislation, the Paying a Fair Share Act, S. 2230, for April 161h.    As you know, Congresswoman Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) has introduced the House companion to Senator Whitehouse’s bill, H.R. 3903, which I have cosponsored.

As millions ofmiddle class Americans struggle to make ends meet, and with the President calling on Congress to act, I believe we must put aside partisan differences and do the right thing for our country by considering this commonsense proposal. I strongly urge you to take all necessary action to ensure that legislation instituting a “Buffett Rule” is brought to a vote when the U.S. House of Representatives returns to session.

I thank you in advance for your consideration and look forward to your response.

Cassie Tharinger Returns Cider to Rhode Island


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Cassie Tharinger and John Bunker
Cassie Tharinger and John Bunker
Cassie Tharinger (L) and John Bunker (R) under a Black Oxford apple tree (courtesy C. Tharinger)

Hard cider was once the Drink of Americans. Every farm produced it. John Adams drank a tankard of it every morning. Children drank a drink called ciderkin. And the famous apples of the Johnny Appleseed legend? Apples intended to be turned into hard cider.

Even Prohibition, which utilized the destruction of apple trees as a symbol of temperance, included a passage in the Volstead Act explicitly allowing farmers to make cider while the rest of the country went dry. That proved to be its undoing, decentralized as it was, America’s large industrial brewers quickly pumped beer into throats of the newly-populated cities, and cider’s popularity plummeted.

But Rhode Islander Cassie Tharinger sees fresh life in it; in the last 5-10 years, cider has been returning to the American drink list. Just as the craft brewing industry has revitalized American beer, the craft cider industry has an opening. Perhaps one better than the craft brewing industry, as no single cidery dominates the market as Anheuser-Busch InBev and MillerCoors do among breweries.

Ms. Tharinger, raised in Vermont, moved to Rhode Island about twelve years ago and worked at the Rhode Island State Council on the Arts, while hobby fermenting cider on her own time. She also became the fruit coordinator for Urban Greens, a harder task back before farmers’ markets began to spring up. It required her to take trips to Hill Orchards in Johnston, RI, where the owner, Allan Hill, taught her more and more about growing apples. With her hobby cider-fermenting on one hand, and this newfound passion for apples on the other, “I saw my interests dovetailing,” she says.

But most of Johnny Appleseed’s hard cider apple nurseries have long ago been cut down, despite what tales will tell you. So Ms. Tharinger moved to Maine for a year and a half to study under John Bunker of Fedco Trees, a large tree nursery that propagates old apple varieties. According to Ms. Tharinger, Mr. Bunker’s philosophy is that the study of apples is worthless without propagation.

At this point, it’s good to understand how apples spread. “Each new seed produces a new variety, your Granny Smith seed does not equal a Granny Smith apple tree,” she says. Instead, branches of one tree are grafted onto another tree, so on one tree, many varieties of apple might grow. Fedco Trees has a research nursery, which Ms. Tharinger runs. “It’s a repository of varieties,” she says. A living library of apples.

Now she had a plan: “to root cider in good orchard growing.” Armed with both an understanding of apple-growing and cider-brewing, she returned to Rhode Island to create a cidery based around an orchard. With American hard cider apple varieties hard to come by while demand is growing; and no existing importation trade for English, French, and Spanish cider apples; the potential cidery needs to grow its own cider apples, she reasoned. For the last six to nine months, Ms. Tharinger has been pursuing her dream; putting together a business plan, networking, and doing outreach for the cidery.*

Hard Cider
A couple of glasses of cider (via Mother Earth News)

But it’s never just that simple. With cider (except for that dark brown liquid previously known as “apple juice”) out of the American drinking landscape for the last 90 years, cidermakers have had to start pushing for better rules about what constitutes cider. The dream, pushed for by cider advocate Steve Wood of Farnum Hill Ciders, is a cider section in your local liquor store. The Cidermakers’ Conference, which recently held its second annual meeting, is pushing for a legal definition and regulation. While there is a federal license, few state ones exist; Massachusetts and Vermont are exceptions. Rhode Island has nothing about cider anywhere. Indeed, its laws aren’t conducive to starting a cidery.

“I’ve thought about going somewhere else, but this is home,” says Ms. Tharinger, visibly troubled. She says that not only is land expensive, but the poor small business environment is daunting.

A bill introduced by Representatives Teresa Tanzi (D – Narragansett, Peace Dale, Wakefield) and Jared Nunes (D – Coventry, W. Warwick) would allow farm wineries to sell at farmers’ markets. But the liquor lobby has come down hard against it, and Ms. Tharinger says that it’s hard to get farm wineries to advocate for the law; angering distributors could impact whether their products make it to shop shelves. But Ms. Tharinger thinks it’s a good move. She’s spoken to other cider start-ups, and selling at farmers’ markets is a way many get started, it’s where most of their selling happens.

Despite the obstacles, Cassie Tharinger sees the potential in starting a cidery here in Rhode Island. And after nearly a century of its absence, Rhode Islanders might just be a thirsty for a little cider.

______________________________

*Previously, this article incorrectly referred to the process of cidermaking as “brewing” rather than “fermenting” and in one instance referred to a “brewery” rather than a “cidery”. I have also corrected a mistake which claimed that European apple varieties were expensive to import; rather trade is non-existent.

Tedx Conference Comes to Providence on April 15

TedxProvidence co-founders, Tino Chow (left) and Peter Haas (right).

Tedx is coming to Providence on April 15. I recently met with one of its co-founders, Peter Haas, to discuss the upcoming event.

What is TEDX?

TEDx is an independently organized TED style event operated under a license from TED.  According to TED:

“TEDx was created in the spirit of TED’s mission, “ideas worth spreading.” The program is designed to give communities, organizations and individuals the opportunity to stimulate dialogue through TED-like experiences at the local level.  At TEDx events, a screening of TEDTalks videos — or a combination of live presenters and TEDTalks videos — sparks deep conversation and connections. TEDx events are fully planned and coordinated independently, on a community-by-community basis.”

What impact will having TEDXProvidence have? What do you hope to achieve by bringing it here?

The first TEDXProvidence event is scheduled for April 15, 2012 and has been sold-out for weeks. Providence already has a few fantastic ideas conferences, such as: Business Innovation Factory’s Summit on Collaboration (now in its 8th season; aka, BIF-8), the Brown and RISD student-led conference on socially conscious design, A Better World by Design (celebrating it’s 5th year in 2012), and the recently sold-out SEEED, a national summit on building and strengthening social enterprise ecosystems and communities; and TEDXProvidence will allow us to explore in depth the great work that is going on, specifically, in this city. TEDxProvidence aims to highlight the fantastic and inspirational stories coming out of Providence. We want to be the local ideas festival for the city, and builds on our city’s reputation as a global leader for being able to coalesce student and professional populations in order to both celebrate and create real change.

Like all of the other conferences previously mentioned, TEDXProvidence plans on serving as a platform for bringing students, academics and professionals from the private and public sectors together.

Please check out our web site, www.tedxprovidence.com. And follow us on Twitter at @TEDxProvidence or through our Twitter hashtag to follow the stream of dialogue coming out of the upcoming conference at #tedxpvd.

Who are the other players involved in TEDXProvidence?

The organizers are myself, Tino Chow, Caroline Mailloux, and Catherine Laine. We have a number of volunteers. We’ve gotten a lot of the support from our community from local food trucks (e.g., Fancheezical, Rocket Fine Streetfood and Mijos Tacos); Twobolt our printing sponsor; Providence Monthly our advertising sponsor; and VideoZ Corporate Film & Video Productions is doing our filming.

How did you get involved in the TED Movement?

I am a TED Senior Fellow, so I have been going to TED for several years on that fellowship. TED fellows have specific projects they are doing to make the world a better place. For example, my senior fellowship project has been training masons how to build earthquake resistant construction in Haiti. To date we’ve trained over 4000 masons.

RI Progress Report: Same Sex Divorce, Newt and Neumont


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

The Wall Street Journal has covered Rhode Island so much lately, it ought to devote a beat to us – if not a dedicated section. Yesterday, the Rupert Murdoch-owned paper reported that Chafee sent $70 million in early state aid payments for struggling cities and towns. Also, a WSJ op/ed yesterday lauded Rhode Island for its handling on Medicaid spending.

Talk about a glass-half-empty attitude … while same sex couple still can’t marry in Rhode Island, a bill being considered at the State House would let them get divorced.

It sounds like Newt Gingrich will be campaigning in Rhode Island this month … campaigning for exactly what, we’re not sure, seeing that he’s already been statistically eliminated from the GOP nomination.

With funding still uncertain, the Interagency Council on Homelessness approved a plan that would emphasize housing over shelters. A great step in the right direction.

So long, Neumont University, we hardly knew ya … and it turns out we won’t get to know you any better as the Utah-based for-profit college has decided against opening an Ocean State campus.

While the word was that Gov. Chafee and supporters of medical marijuana in the General Assembly came to an agreement on a bill that would allow cannabis compassion centers to open, no one really knows how much pot they’ll be able to have or grow.

It turns out Senators Ruggerio and Ciccone weren’t the only ones familiar with the State House at the now-infamous arrest in Barrington.

Don’t let anyone ever tell you activism is thankless work … at least it’s not for Frank Beazley, an advocate for the disabled for whom the General Assembly will rename the center for patients with paralysis and other disabilities.

Good news … Providence Business News says leading economic indicators continue to show improvements for the fourth month in a row.