Compassion Center Passes Senate, House Vote Wed.


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Senate President Teresa Paiva Weed and Senator Rhoda Perry celebrate after the Senate passed the medical marijuana compassion center bill.

A compromise bill that would, after much delay, pave the way for three medical marijuana compassion centers to open in Rhode Island passed the Senate overwhelmingly today by a vote of 35 to 3. The bill now heads to the House where it will be heard a week from today.

“We’ve worked since last summer to try to deal with the problems the governor felt we had,” said Sen. Rhoda Perry, a progressive Democrat from Providence, referencing the fact that Chafee declined to sign the original bill into law after threats of prosecution from the federal government.

Perry said limiting the amount of plants a compassion center can have on hand to 150, 99 of which can be mature, and the amount of processed cannabis to 1,500 ounces, or just under 94 pounds.

Perry said she expects the legislation will pass in the House when it is heard there next week.

“I feel pretty confident,” she said. “The Speaker and the Senate president have been on board with this.”

Perry said she doesn’t use pot herself, noting that she has heart rhythm problem that could be exacerbated by doing so, but she did have a nephew who died of complications related to AIDS who would have benefited from it. In fact, the bill is named in part for him.

“He wouldn’t dare use marijuana because he would have been afraid to get arrested,” she said. “He had great problems with nausea and wasting.”

The bill is called the Edward O. Hawkins and Thomas C. Slater Medical Marijuana Act. Hawkins is Perry’s nephew and Slater, a former state Rep., who passed away while he was in office, was a champion of medical marijuana issues. His son, Scott, who had a baby with his two days ago, now holds his seat in the House and sponsored that chamber’s version of the bill.

 

 

North Carolina Votes for Marriage Inequality


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

So Amendment One in North Carolina passed via voter referendum, and it passed overwhelmingly. Simply put, Amendment One criminalizes love.

Not only does it add a ban on the rights of homosexuals to marry (already illegal in North Carolina) to their state constitution, it bans the existence of civil unions between even straight couples. It passed overwhelmingly, 61% in favor to 39% against. Many voters didn’t even know it would impact civil unions.

Having lived in North Carolina for a reasonable amount of time, I can say there are truly people there who have no great love for this amendment. I think it’s fair to say that many hate it. Americans around the country are rightly reviled that such a thing could be written into law. But many others are rejoicing. The last state of the Old Confederacy has been redeemed.

We are often wrongly taught history in themes; we see the United States as possessing the theme of freedom; that at key points in our history (1776, 1862, 1919, 1964) we have pressed for freedom. Not only is this reductive, it is wrong. We must take this time to remind ourselves that the history of this nation is not an unstoppable march to freedom, but a titanic and bloody struggle that we must find the strength to fight. Just as there were no guarantees of victory in 1776, there are no guarantees that tomorrow is brighter than today. It is up to us to carry the fight forward.

For those of us who live outside of North Carolina, we must take this moment to take stock of our own struggle, the struggle to legalize love. The anger we feel at the 61% of North Carolinians who voted for this abominable amendment should be harnessed and directed towards our efforts in our own states. Around the country, there is still much work to be done.

One thing that irks me here is the discussion of the sanctity of marriage. My family hails from various parts of New England, and I am partly descended from Puritan Yankee stock. And ironically, for the Puritans, who are known as the most religious of the English settlers, marriage was not particularly sanctified. Most Puritans were married by the magistrate, not by a minister. It was a contract between two adults recognized by the community; and indeed, in many ways, this has been written into law. Marriage is a contract.

And this where the “sanctity of marriage” argument falls apart for me (though admittedly it was always weak to me as an atheist). If you get married in a chapel, your marriage isn’t real unless there’s a representative of the state to hand you a marriage certificate. It’s not the priest who marries you, it’s the state. Marriage is a state institution. And for a state to hand out preferential rights on the basis of declared sexual orientation; well it doesn’t make much sense to me. To the state, what difference does it make?

The idea that marriage can be gay or straight makes about as much sense as the building of the State House being gay or straight. It makes as much sense as declaring that sidewalks are gay or straight. Or declaring the entire institution of government to be gay or straight. It knows no sexual orientation. It knows no religious denomination. It cannot worship. It cannot love. It cannot cry out in despair.

North Carolina’s Amendment One could be one of two things. It could be a supernova of intolerance; burning brightly at its end. Or it could be the beginning of a turning backwards. Record numbers of Americans support the rights of their fellow Americans to marry, regardless of sexual orientation. But there are no guarantees in history. If we want something, we must strive for it.

CRMC Votes For South Kingstown Sea Wall


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

In a 9-0 vote, with one abstention the Coastal Resource Management Council in reconsidering the application of the Town of South Kingstown voted to approve the construction of a 202 ft sheet pile wall armament as a measure of protection for the sole access road into the seaside community of Matunuck.

Executive Director, Grover Fugate presented a four-prong approach for dealing with the critical erosion issues in Matunuck and other Rhode Island Coastal areas. The first prong, of immediate concern dealt with the “imminent peril situation” in Matunuck, presented by Town Manager, Stephen Alfred as a public health and safety concern for residents should Matunuck Beach Road infrastructure fail.

Calling upon the full Council to take action in support of public safety, Fugate proffered his plan. “It is an attempt to try and deal with the problem that is immediately before us.” Implemented as a stop gap measure, the 202 ft. armament was designed to shore up the critical segment of road presently exposed by severe and sustained erosion.

In his memo, dated May 4, 2012 to the Council in anticipation of the vote, Fugate cautioned, “Even if the town were to agree on some of the alternatives suggested at the hearings and in the staff reports, there is an implementation lag of 18-36 months. The road is already in a compromised state and one good coastal storm could significantly damage it.”

Attorney William Landry, representing Kevin Finnegan, owner of the Ocean Mist, as well as Francis O’Brien who owns Tara’s Pub, just east of the Ocean Mist property pleaded with the council to consider additional measures. Suggesting soft measures and a united approach to resolving the Town’s issue, Landry acknowledged the existent conditions.

“There is a vulnerable area west of the Ocean Mist at which the most severe erosion is occurring. Frankly, it may well be occurring because of the location of the Ocean Mist and the swirling effect of the water collecting in that area. That’s the area 40 ft. maybe tops where everyone is saying, we’re getting real close to the road here.”

Donald J. Packer, attorney for residents and abutters spoke in support of the Town’s proposal and presented the Council with the additional support of the trustees responsible for the parcel of land directly adjacent to the sheet pile wall placement.  Addressing his colleague’s indication that the Town didn’t have the ability or own the land south of the proposed armament, seaward, assured the council that his clients were on board. “I think that we can maybe put on the table in dealing with the condemnation issue, [they] are prepared to work with the Town and what’s necessary with the town to do what they need to do.”

Packer’s clients have been in previous discussion with Finnegan regarding a possible purchase of the property adjacent to the Ocean Mist on the west.  “Apparently there is nothing on the table at this point other than the Town’s proposal. My clients at this point are concerned that the road will be lost and are asking that this be approved.”

Several environmental advocacy groups appeared to testify before the council with each voicing its concern regarding hardened structures and while acknowledging the need for immediate action in the case of Matunuck.

The special exception granted and application approved, the question of time still weighs heavy on the residents of Matunuck. The Town will need to move through the necessary stages of approval with the State Department of Transportation in advancing the project. Utility lines, approved for relocation will be moved to the northern side of Matunuck Beach Road prior to commencing construction.

The Town’s timeline, per Alfred is for construction to begin the first week in September. Hurricane season will be underway and the hope is to have the project complete before another major storm wages war with what remains of the beach and headlands adjacent to the road.

CRMC recommendations moving forward include a comprehensive Special Area Management Plan (SAMP) for Rhode Island’s shoreline, monitoring and enforcement in designated areas and a cooperative effort of all individuals concerned with ongoing protection and mitigation efforts for the State’s barrier beaches.

ALEC Funds Brien’s Travel Costs to Annual Meeting


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Conservative Rep. Jon Brien, of Woonsocket, will be attending his first ALEC meeting as a member of the far right wing group’s board of directors when he travels to Charlotte, NC on Thursday for its annual Spring Task Force meeting where, he said, one of the orders of business will be “coming up with a strategy to win the war against the left wing media.”

ALEC task forces pair state legislators with corporate sponsors to formulate policy and write model legislation to be used in state legislatures across the country. At this year’s spring meeting, ALEC members will discuss, according to an agenda: 21st century commerce and taxation; insurance; education; energy, environment and agriculture; health and human services; and tax and fiscal policy, among other topics.

Brien said the American Legislative Exchange Council will reimburse him for the cost of his plane ticket, which cost under $400 and two nights in a hotel. Because ALEC is not a registered lobbyist with the state and has no bills before the General Assembly there are no requirements that Brien disclose the money ALEC is paying for him to attend to conference.

Interestingly, but unrelated to Brien’s trip, Common Cause Rhode Island sent a letter to the state Ethics Commission yesterday “requesting greater disclosure of gifts and travel of elected officials.”

In an email sent out yesterday, Common Cause wrote:

“In light of recent events in Rhode Island, with expensive travel by elected officials not being reported, Common Cause requests the Ethics Commission enact a regulation requiring disclosure of any gift over $25 received by an elected official by virtue of their being an elected official. Rhode Islanders have a right to know who is trying to influence their public officials. Without a complete picture of the flow of influence, citizens cannot fully determine who is behind the laws that govern them.”

John Marion, the executive director of Common Cause Rhode Island, agreed with Brien that under the current rules, he does not need to disclose the trip to the ALEC conference. “Because ALEC doesn’t have any bills before the legislature – its members do – there’s no requirement to disclose,” he said. “ALEC essentially acts as the pass through.”

But, he added, it’s important that citizens know “who is influencing our legislators,” he said. “These entities are out there paying for things for legislators and the only way we know about it is when a reporter happens to stumble onto it.”

RI Progress Report: URI Profs File Suit, West Warwick, Tar Heels on Marriage Equality, Doherty and US Chamber


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

URI professors have filed a lawsuit against the state saying the Board of Governors for Higher Education broke the law when they declined to ratify a contract they had already agreed to after Gov. Chafee weighed in on the matter. Profs may win in court, but in order to win in the court of public opinion they will have to make the case that the state isn’t adequately funding the state’s premier university.

Ted Nesi writes an excellent story about West Warwick’s budget problems. What he doesn’t mention is that the state cut some $6.25 million from the struggling city in the last three budget cycles.

The Projo editorial board writes that the socialists electoral victory in Europe “demonstrated that a slim majority of the French (and a larger majority of the Europeans in general) want more public spending and other actions to stimulate the economy and cut unemployment.” We’ll see if they draw the same conclusion about the United States this October.

It’ll be hard for Brendan Doherty to parse himself as a moderate when the uber-conservative U.S. Chamber of Commerce is running ads in Rhode Island on his behalf.

North Carolina voters approved a constitutional amendment that bans all forms of same sex legal relationship rights. Congrats, Tar Heel state, your intolerance is unmatched.

And in Indiana, Richard Mourdock, a Tea Party candidate who beat longtime Senate moderate Richard Lugar in a primary yesterday, said he doesn’t believe in bipartisanship.

Conservative Rep. Jon Brien says he’ll support a supplemental tax increase for Woonsocket.

If you’re surprised that Rhode Island gives away $1.6 billion in tax breaks, you haven’t been reading RI Future. We reported this yesterday.

Jolicoeur Square: Not So Unique in Woonsocket


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
In 1921 a war weary nation was pulling itself together after the horrors and losses of the Great War, later and unfortunately to be known as World War I. Cities and towns across the nation began the process of mourning and memorializing their dead, and Woonsocket, Rhode Island was no exception. That year the small mill city dedicated ten “squares” to Woonsocket natives who had fallen in the war. The squares were set at intersections throughout the city, and dedicated during a visit from the supreme commander of the allied forces during the war, Ferdinand Foch, on tour in the United States after retirement.
Some of the squares dedicated seem to be newly minted, in that there were previously no official names for the locations, but others had names long established. Having now located and extensively photographed all ten of the squares on May 7, 2012, I can now attest to the fact that it is only the monument erected on Jolicoeur Square that has any kind of religious imagery. Worse, it is only Jolicoeur Place where one can find any evidence that any WWI soldiers were honored over ninety years ago for their service to this country. The other nine squares have been forgotten, and any trace of the men who were honored is gone, if it were ever there to begin with.
I will start from the south and work my north, in the order I came upon them.
The intersection of Providence St. and Smithfield Rd. became Riendeau Square in memory of Alderic Riendeau. Right on the border of Smithfield, right next to the Gaston A. Ayotte Jr. Baseball field is a little patch of land with a concrete marker that may have once honored Alderic Riendeau, but it has sadly been stripped of most of it’s metal. Since I did not even find this much evidence of previous honors at the other sites I visited, it’s also possible that this tiny monument had nothing to do with WWI or Riendeau.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Next up was the intersection of Knight St., Cottage St. and Logee St. which became Roberge Square in memory of Lionel Roberge. This well maintained micro-park is located in one of the better sections of Woonsocket, a very picturesque spot. There is no sign of anything to do with Lionel Roberge, but there is a lovely sign honoring firefighter Jeffrey C. Boisvert. There is also a clock and a couple of benches.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The intersection of Green St. and Bernon St. was named for Joseph R. Coutu. Here is a wide street with no sign of any park, monument, benches or markers. There is nothing here but the Cool Corner Creamery and the Church of the Acts, which is a pretty amazing looking church, what with it’s negative space Jesus sign and red, white and blue Christmas lights spelling out JESUSAVES with the USA in the middle lit for emphasis. Coutu Square is lacking one thing, however: any evidence that Joe Coutu was once honored here.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Normandin Square stands in stark contrast to Coutu Square. Named for Sgt. Oscar S. Normandin, the site is located at the intersection of Court St. and Front St, and was previously called Court Square. Actually, strike that. It is still called Court Square on Google Maps. The square may have been renamed, but the name didn’t stick (which, as we will see, is a common occurance.) Sgt. Oscar Normandin’s little patch of land was forgotten, and the name “Court Square” is still used today. The statue on the square is dedicated to veterans of the Philippine-American War (1899-1902). It’s a beautiful statue and the area is quite well maintained.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Flynn Square was another name that didn’t stick. Named for Lt. Harold F Flynn, (I think you got better square locations in the city depending on your military rank, but that’s just a theory) the space is today still known as Depot Square, because that’s where the Providence-Woonsocket train depot is located. The train depot today houses the Blackstone River Valley Authority, and operates as a sort of tourist center. I will say that Woonsocket is a bit rundown and beat up, but it is a singularly beautiful New England mill town, rich in history and beauty. Still, there’s no sign here of Lt. Flynn or his brave sacrifice.

 

 

 

Across from the old train depot is a mini-park called Veterans Memorial Park maintained by the Woonsocket Lions Club. Since the mini-park technically abuts the lost location of Flynn Square I checked it out as well. A plaque talks of the park being ravaged by the flood of August 1955. I wonder if that’s the same flood that caused the roads around the Jolicoeur monument to be re-routed, leaving the cross in the center of a parking lot?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Market Square is the cultural and historical center of Woonsocket these days. here is located the Museum of Work and Culture, a terrific day trip with a fantastic gift shop. Also located here is Ye Olde English Fish and Chips, which has the best seafood chowder and fish and chips in Rhode Island, if not New England. But did you know that Market Square is not officially called Market Square? No, the name of this place is Young Square, named in the memory of WWI veteran Andrew F. Young. Only problem is, the name didn’t stick, and everyone calls it Market Square. If you look hard enough you might find a marker for WWI vet Narcisse Joyal Jr., but of Andrew Young I found no sign.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The intersection of Blackstone St. and Harris Ave. was once known as Randal Square, but since 1921 the name has officially been Curtis Square, named for Pvt. Arthur Curtis. There’s a monument here for General Casmir Pulaski, who gave his life (I think) fighting for American Independence in 1779. There are no other markers at the small park. I’m pretty sure that few if any people who pass by this spot each day have ever heard of Arthur Curtis.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Social Corner at the intersection of Cumberland, Social and Rathbun Streets shows no sign of having ever been once dedicated to the memory of Donatien Belhumeur. Perhaps for a very short time following its dedication in 1921 the intersection was occasionally referred to as Belhumeur Square, but when I asked a man who worked in a nearby business for the name of the place, he said “Social Corner.” He didn’t know and had never heard any other name for it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Filici Square, named in memory of WWI veteran Giovanni Filici is located at the corner of Social St. and Diamond Hill Rd. There is nothing there to indicate that this intersection was ever once thought special enough to be named in honor of a fallen patriot. There is nothing there.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This photo essay could not be complete without paying a visit to Jolicoeur Square, even though it has by now been photographed extensively. My visit this morning was not greeted by retired veterans guarding it, as have been there in the past. The location is just a big parking lot, in the center of which rested the monument built for the Gagne brothers.  We can now be sure that Jolicoeur was not being honored by the monument, he only gave his name to the patch of land the Gagne monument rests upon. Had the monument not been built there, it is entirely possible that Jolicoeur’s tiny patch of land would be as forgotten as the squares of Flynn, Young, Normandin, Curtis, Coutu, Belhumeur, Filici, Roberge and Riendeau.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What else can be noticed about all the locations I visited? One thing stands out: The lack of any kind of religious imagery on any of the squares. The veterans are all honored with secular, not religious symbols and words. Outside the Jolicoeur location I did not see a single cross on publicly owned land. I did not read a single mention of God, or see any prayers. What I saw was imagery that expressed the heartfelt thanks of a citizenry wise enough to know that church and state should not be mixed.
Further proof? Here’s a Civil War Memorial located right in downtown Woonsocket. No prayers, no Gods, no crosses. Just a remembrance of fallen veterans that all Americans can appreciate.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Go back and look at the pictures from the Veterans Memorial Park. No religious imagery there, either.
It was only in 1952, when the Cold war was under way and the Godless Commies were stockpiling nukes that the United States started to blur the line between church and state. In Woonsocket, this took the form of placing a cross on top of the monument to the Gagne brothers. It wasn’t necessary to do so, as we’ve seen, there are plenty of excellent tributes to Woonsocket’s veterans scattered throughout the city, none of which sport a religious message.
Another thing this research shows is that there is nothing intrinsically special about Jolicoeur Square. It is only one of ten locations throughout Woonsocket, and the only reason anyone knows of it is because it was chosen as the location of the Gagne brothers memorial. There is no particular reason that the Gagne brothers memorial needs to be on the Jolicoeur Square. There is no real connection between the two families (as far as I know) aside from the shared French-Canadian heritage. It therefore follows that the Gagne Memorial can be moved without any insult to Jolicoeur’s family, or to the Gagnes.
The fact is that none of the places I visited are considered in any way to be special areas for fallen WWI soldiers. This is not my opinion, it’s the opinion of the generations of people who have ignored, renamed or paved over these squares. If we want to vest these locations with specialness once more, then we need to not single out the one location that happens to have an inappropriate cross on top, but include all the locations in some sort of larger effort. Hopefully this essay can be sen as the beginning of such an effort.
As far as Jolicoeur Square goes, the land (or some other piece of land) could and should be re-dedicated to William Jolicoeur,  perhaps with a small plaque or sign. A similar plaque or sign could be installed throughout the city at the other nine sites as well, especially those sites that have been completely lost or forgotten in time. I don’t expect that anyone in Woonsocket is prepared to start calling Market Square “Young Square” in contradiction to years of familiarity, but a small sign remembering the valor of Andrew F. Young might be in order.
What this research shows is that a compromise is possible between those who want the cross to stay on the Gagne monument, and those who want it removed. The cross can be moved to private property with no insult to the Gagne or Jolicoeur families. The Jolicouer Square can be re-dedicated, along with nine other forgotten heroes, and church and state can continue to be protected from each other.