State spends $5 million on private school transportation, textbooks


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

School BusRhode Island spent more than $5.4 million in 2014 on transportation and textbooks for students who attend private and parochial schools, according to the Department of Education.

“The textbook law has been in the books since the 19th century,” said RIDE spokesman Elliot Krieger. “The transport law on books since the 1970s.”

Governor Gina Raimondo’s proposed budget calls for cuts to this public subsidy to private schools. The state paid $4,873,473 in transportation costs and $554,974 for textbooks in 2014 and Raimondo proposed cutting each expenditure in half.

“Some tough choices needed to be made,” said spokeswoman Marie Aberger, and Raimondo instead proposed a “record investments in K-12 education; the full implementation of all-day kindergarten across the state; and funding for dual enrollment, last dollar scholarships, loan forgiveness and workforce development.”

But it seems like legislative leaders will seek to have the private school funding put back into the budget.

Said House Speaker Mattiello, in a statement, “The tax-paying parents who make the choice to send their children to private schools are lessening the burden on municipalities because the cities and towns do not have to pay to educate these students. The least we can do for these parents is to provide textbooks and bus transportation when necessary. Without transportation, some parents would be unable to make the choice to send their children to private schools, and a greater burden would then be placed on municipalities to educate them.”

Senate President Paiva Weed, who more often finds common ground with Raimondo than Mattiello, agrees with the speaker on this one.

“The Senate supports restoration of the funding for textbooks and transportation services for private schools. Parents of children in private schools pay their taxes just like other parents in the community,” she said. “Collectively, their decision to send their children to private schools saves valuable public resources. For many years, the Senate has chosen to support the funding of transportation services and textbooks for private school students despite previous attempts to cut the funding.”

Aberger, Raimondo’s spokeswoman, seemed to understand that subsidizing private school education was sacrosanct to legislative leaders. “The Governor respects the legislative process and knows the General Assembly will make adjustments as her jobs budget moves forward,” she said.

The Senate Finance Committee will discuss the issue at a hearing on Thursday.

Our right to die is our right to live


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Brittany_Maynard
Brittany Maynard (Wikipedia)

On Wednesday the House Committee on Health, Education and Welfare will hear testimony on the Lila Manfield Sapinsley Compassionate Care Act. This bill would allow terminally ill and mentally competent adult patients the right to access medications to end their suffering and their lives. The legislation replicates laws already passed in Oregon, Washington, and Vermont.

Last year 29 year old Brittany Maynard forever changed the discourse on this subject. When diagnosed with inoperable brain cancer, Maynard and her husband moved to Oregon to take advantage of the Death with Dignity Act passed there in 1998. She died on her own terms, surrounded by those she loved on November 1.

Maynard publicly demonstrated that how we face death is a matter of personal ethics, informed by our beliefs and our conscience. No one should dictate the way we die any more than they should dictate the way we live, yet too often we see those dealing with difficult, end-of-life decisions being infantilized, as if terminal disease trumps our autonomy and humanity.

National Right to Life, which opposes Death with Dignity legislation, reduced Maynard to little more than a pawn, arguing that she was exploited by Compassion and Choices, a national right to die group, for its own “malevolent purposes.” In this view Maynard is not a person with thoughts, dreams, beliefs and values. Instead she’s an object of pity, defined only by her disease.

Had Maynard been unable to take advantage of the Oregon law, her suffering would not have been her choice, but an edict decreed by the government, or a commandment from someone else’s god. We don’t easily allow such impositions in our lives. Why would we allow their intrusion when we die?

When confronting an end-of-life burdened with intolerable pain and suffering, people should know that their right to end their own life safely and on their own terms is protected. The ability to choose whether to fight another day or to end our suffering empowers us. It is our ability to choose, in death as well as life, that makes us human.

Patreon