Tackling beach erosion with two sticks and a string


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Jon Boothroyd and Bryan Oakley, Geologists with the Rhode Island Geological Survey provide a historical account of coastal erosion in South Kingstown. (Photo Tracey C. O'Neill)
Jon Boothroyd and Bryan Oakley, Geologists with the Rhode Island Geological Survey provide a historical account of coastal erosion in South Kingstown. (Photo Tracey C. O’Neill)

Matunuck –  Armed with just two sticks and a string,  a group of 15 environmentalists took to South Kingstown Town Beach to tackle one of the biggest issues facing Rhode Island: eroding barrier beaches.

“The reason we can hold this kind of workshop is that the technique we use to actually monitor, to create these (profiles) is with a very simple technique,” said Bryan Oakley, University of Rhode Island graduate and Asst. Professor of Environmental Earth Sciences at Eastern Connecticut State University. “We don’t have anything that costs more than $30 to build these sticks. It literally is as we call it two sticks and a string.’ ”

The training is sponsored by the Coastal Resources Management Council in collaboration with the Rhode Island Geological Survey at URI, the beach gathering was intended to encourage volunteers to actively participate in monitoring changes and collecting data on the state’s barrier beaches.

The Emory Board Method

“We like it because it doesn’t require a lot of fancy equipment, “ said Oakley. “So in this day and age of funding, we can go out and set up a new profile for very little money. It’s just time to go run the data.”

20140723_095925
Bryan Oakley (l) and Rob Hollis (c) instruct a group on the science of beach profiling. (Photo Tracey C. O’Neill)

Dubbed the Emery Board method, the profile technique was formulated by the late Kenneth O. Emery, (K.O.), Scientist Emeritus at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute.

“Anybody can learn how to do it. It’s just a matter of consistency and really practice,” said Oakley. “You get better, you get faster, you get more efficient the more you do it.”

“It’s a field driven technique, we like that because its easy to sit and look at GIS and look at long-term changes, to the shoreline, but a lot of the detail is, you’re out here the day after a storm, you collect the data and you can say something about how much the shoreline went away,” he said.

Janet Freedman, CRMC Coastal Geologist helps Dori Boardman with her beach sketch. (Photo Tracey C. O'Neill)
Janet Freedman, CRMC Coastal Geologist helps Dori Boardman with her beach sketch. (Photo Tracey C. O’Neill)

Assisting the two professors in instruction were Janet Freedman, CRMC Coastal Geologist and Rob Hollis, URI Graduate Student.

The two sticks method was also the more practical choice for volunteer profiling as the more technical, kinematic GPS systems cost anywhere from $30,000 to $60,000.

Volunteers were also given tracking, plotting and sketching instruction for future use on their chosen beaches across the state.

Spearheading the training was Dr. Jon Boothroyd, State Geologist and Research Professor Emeritus at URI’s Rhode Island Geological Survey.

“Things are about to happen here,” said Boothroyd. “They are already happening.”

Pointing to South Kingstown Town Beach, where Boothroyd established a profile in 1996, he said, “This is a highly erodible place. It’s eroding at the same rate that some of the beaches are eroding and even more. And we think, we don’t know yet, and we hope the SAMP will shed some light on it, that there’s wave refraction around the shallower water out here. That’s a focus here.”

“The CRMC asked us to start a profile here in 1996,” Boothroyd said.

“They built this part in 1992,” he said of the town beach’s pavilion. “And they built the shore-parallel boardwalk in 1994. Almost as soon as it was built, people started noticing that the scarp and the bluff were approaching the boardwalk pilings.”

Taking care to school participants on the need for beach profiling, Boothroyd and Oakley walked the group through the history and science of the eroding shoreline. Before heading out onto the beach for hands-on training, the educators presented a basic foundation of changes and profiles generally seen on Rhode Island beaches.

Recovery takes time

Residents from multiple coastal communities took part in the training. (Photo Tracey C. O'Neill)
Residents from multiple coastal communities took part in the training. (Photo Tracey C. O’Neill)

The South Kingstown Town Beach is serving as the subject because it provides both historical and current change lessons in geology and meteorology.

“You know that the storms pass off to the east – that the wind comes in from the northeast – and we have what is known as Nor’easters,” said Boothroyd. “Everybody calls an extra- tropical cyclone a Nor’easter, but here if the storm track passes to the west, we have winds coming in from the southeast, so we really have So’easters on this coast. “[It] depends on which way your coast faces.”

Using Superstorm Sandy as a severe weather gauge, Boothroyd explained Sandy’s path and turn away from the RI coast.

“If Sandy hadn’t turned, we’d look like New Jersey. Not everyone believes it, but we dodged a bullet.”

The historical data for the beach, chronicled the changes since Sandy brought the sea ashore in Matunuck.

“Without this data, we wouldn’t know that the bluff here went back 7 meters during Sandy – the crest of the bluff,” said Oakley.

Engaging the participants, Oakley pointed to the scarp (slope formed by wave action) west of the pavilion. “So that scarp you see down there went back, 23 feet give or take during one storm.”

Natural replenishment and erosion is a long process, with intermittent storms and activity forestalling and contributing, in either positive or negative processes, the construct of the barrier beach.

“We’ve found over the years that there’s a cycle, although I’d hate to call it a cycle, but there’s a pattern,” said Boothroyd. “If you start with a very large beach with a big berm, then you have a moderate storm, severe storm, and post-storm recovery, over time it comes back. But it takes actually years to come back, so we’re still recovering here after Sandy.”

Joining the training were volunteers from Middletown, Little Compton, South Kingstown, Charlestown and Narragansett.The Narrow River Preservation Society in Narragansett, Salt Ponds Coalition,  2nd Beach, Middletown and the South Kingstown Conservation Commission were represented.

CRMC may offer additional beach profiling training sessions in the future, according to Laura Dwyer, spokesperson for CRMC.

How to protect your riparian dream from climate change


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Remember what Hurricane Sandy did to the Jersey Shore? One day that will happen here in Rhode Island, too.

Hurricane Senady damage in Westerly. Next storm could be much worse. Image courtesy: FEMA
Hurricane Sandy damage in Westerly. Next storm could be much worse. Image courtesy: FEMA

“We’re planning for a sea level rise of 3-5 feet by 2100 – this could mean that within the lifetime of people born today, Rhode Island’s oceans might rise enough to swallow the beaches as we know them now,” said Laura Dwyer, spokeswoman for the state Coastal Resources Management Council. “Natural hazards like Sandy have also inflicted significant damage to homes and infrastructure along the coast.”

But CRMC is doing more than just offering up doomsday scenarios for beach bums and coastal property owners. The state agency tasked with protecting and managing the shoreline has also partnered with the URI Coastal Resources Center to create the:

Rhode Island Coastal Property Guide

Screen Shot 2014-07-22 at 2.13.42 PM
Screen shot of Rhode Island Coastal Property Guide. (click on the image to check out the site)

It’s a 30-page booklet in the form of a webpage that explains the potential dangers and ecological realities to living the dream of owning ocean-front property. It’s also a handy checklist of everything you need to know to make sure your riparian slice of the American Dream is as safe – and as legal – as possible.

“People who live at the coast or own businesses there are telling me more and more that they are worried about what’s going to happen to their properties, and they want to know what to do about the impacts we are seeing from storms and sea level rise,” said Grover Fugate, CRMC executive director. “The guide gives people practical ways they can start adapting to these significant impacts associated with living near the shore.”

For example, the guide can help you glean if your property requires flood insurance (hint: if you think you need to check this out, there’s a good chance it does) and how one can – and cannot – protect their investment from a catastrophic weather event. (If it doesn’t seem like this would be good news for Rhode Island realtors, think again.)

“Rising sea level and extreme weather events resulting from global warming will have a significant impact on Rhode Island in the years to come,” said URI Graduate School of Oceanography Dean Bruce Corliss. “The Rhode Island Property Guide will provide timely and valuable information for residents and businesses to address these threats and is the result of the ongoing collaboration between URI CRC, CRMC, and Rhode Island Sea Grant to address the needs of Rhode Island’s coastal communities.”

Economic Intersections report, meet coastal resilience necessity


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

gear-grabOn first reading, I give Economic Intersections, the Make it Happen Rhode Island report from the RI Foundation and Commerce RI a B.

It’s mostly things we’ve heard before like tech transfer, support for manufacturing and regulatory reform. It has some very good, new areas of focus, and it has an interesting idea that doesn’t quite make the grade. But I’m writing this short piece because there is one, glaring, horrifying and totally irresponsible part that defies any kind of logic whatsoever, at least as it is presented in this executive summary.

Good

The best part of this is the new focus on food production. There is a clear understanding that this burgeoning sector represents an important part of our next economy, and the report recognizes many important factors in building out the industry. Farms and farmland now have much better visibility within the state’s economic apparatus.

Even better, there is a section focused on the “food-health nexus.” Simply having those two words together in a state-level economics report represents a giant step forward. Medical technologies, neuroscience and bioscience all still hold their places at the top of the economy the report envisions, but actual health and what makes it possible—good, fresh food—is in the mix. Yay!

Not So Good

The report devotes a section to making Rhode Island “stronger and more resilient.” In this area, there doesn’t seem to be a lot of expertise at the table, as evidenced by the goal of creating “scalable approaches to economic development through resiliency.”

Resilience doesn’t scale. Lack-of-scale is the essence of resilience. As I’ve written here many times, resilience is based on redundancy, which is inherently inefficient and therefore not scalable. Many small things within redundant networks so that when some of them experience catastrophic failures—as will certainly happen with greater frequency—the system continues to function through alternate paths. The only thing that scales is the network.

The intention is to spawn companies that develop approaches and technologies around community resilience, as if resiliency were a product. I think what they really mean is “protection from catastrophe,” which is different from resilience. And, certainly, there’s a market to be made in protection from catastrophe, because there will be no shortage of global warming-driven catastrophes.

Some might hold out hope that once the economic apparatus starts to examine resilience and systems-oriented approaches to the impacts of climate change, they may actually/accidentally start to pursue genuine resilience.

But don’t hold your breath. Here’s why.

Blind, Stupid, Irresponsible

I like the top-line idea here: promote access to water and marine-based businesses. When you’re the Ocean State, it’s kind of a no-brainer. But this section of the report has a glaring blind spot, a miss so incredibly stupid that it might be more irresponsible than the 38 Studios deal.

Nowhere in this section—even in this section of the full report—does one find the terms “climate change,” “global warming” or “rising sea levels.” It’s true that they throw a bone to the Coastal Resource Management Council’s current role in this area, but CRMC is conspicuously absent from the list of public entities in the plan moving forward.

The plan is heavy on access to the water and marketing. Which means, of course, building right at the water’s edge. Think “marina access to a mini-resort”.

This represents an irresponsibly short-sighted approach. Coastal properties already have almost no choice but the federal insurance pool, and these costs will certainly only go higher. It is only a matter of time before any coastal infrastructure gets destroyed.

To add insult to injury, the full report refers to New York City’s 2011 Comprehensive Waterfront Plan, and the last of its eight goals is “Increase Climate Resilience.” I mean…right?

This is the kind of pull-your-hair-out stupid that still permeates our econo-think. It’s possible that they never put two and two together to make four. Or it’s possible that “certain powers” deliberately excluded the TOTALLY FRICKIN’ OBVIOUS, SIMPLE LIKE FALLING DOWN CONNECTION HERE!

(As background, Gov. Carcieri’s administration actively worked to suppress any mention of solar power in the RIEDC’s 2009/2010 Green Economy Roadmap authored by yours truly. So this kind of move is nothing new.)

CONNECT. THE. DOTS!

I know this is complicated, so I’ll go step by step.

1. The report is called Economic Intersections, so it’s about connecting things that might be complementary.

2. One idea in the report is to develop marine-based businesses, following New York’s waterfront plan.

3. New York’s waterfront plan includes increasing the waterfront’s resilience.

4. Another idea in the report is to develop resilience.

It seems so elementary, so obvious that I’m embarrassed to have to spell it out like this, but…here goes:

Focus your resiliency efforts on the coastal impacts of global warming-driven sea level rise and catastrophic weather events so that your marine-based businesses can be, oh, I don’t know…resilient.

Is Taylor Swift Stealing Public Property? [UPDATED]


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Photo courtesy of WJAR/NBC 10. Click on image for original.
Photo courtesy of WJAR/NBC 10. Click on image for original.

Well, it’s not 2014 yet, but Taylor Swift is already making a bid to be on GoLocalProv’s “14 who made a difference in RI in 2014” list, mainly by making RI a little smaller.

Reporter David Collins of The Day describes the scene around the Nashville country star’s mansion:

Not only is the Swift contractor plucking and moving around big ocean boulders, but they have added a whole new line of rock sea wall on what had previously been a public beach, at a location that appears to be below mean high tide.

Just a note, if it’s below mean high tide, it’s public property in RI, specifically to prevent folks like Swift whose reach might exceed their grasp from grasping up our waters and beaches.

Collins also points out that the wall is permitted only by the RI Coastal Resources Management Commission, not Westerly:

After touring the Swift construction site Friday from the public perimeters, I headed to Town Hall, thinking the permits on file there would better explain what’s going on.

So imagine my surprise when the first person I encountered at the building office said the only work she knew of at the Swift mansion was the installation of a generator.

I then asked to speak with Building Official David Murphy, who acknowledged that he does indeed know of the extensive work going on at the Swift house.

Indeed, when I suggested it must be costing more than a million dollars, he raised his eyebrows and said it is probably costing a lot more than that.

Still, he said, he has decided that no building permit is needed.

That means, of course, that there are no plans for the work on file in the building office. And there will be no building permit sent along to the tax assessor, to trigger a property tax increase.

And no permit fee, assessed at the rate of $7 per thousand spent, was charged.

I don’t know, maybe this is typical Watch Hill behavior. They say good fences make good neighbors, so I imagine a fence made out of boulders will make very good neighbors indeed. Hey, and a fence down below the mean high tide mark, well, that might be even better.

Gawker decided to run with the story in this manner: “Taylor Swift is Fucking Up the Rhode Island Coastline

 

UPDATE: CRMC Says It’s All Okay, Swings on 1982 Court Case

Address Beach Erosion, Climate Change Tonight


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
The deck of the Ocean Mist, one of the most vulnerable local businesses to coastal erosion.

The Coastal Resource Management Council is officially kicking off its eagerly anticipated Beach Special Area Management Plan (SAMP) at 6pm tonight in the Corliss Auditorium at URI’s Bay Campus

Here’s a little teaser video from a press conference hosted by CRMC at the Ocean Technology Center yesterday featuring Executive Director Grover Fugate.

The event this evening is open to the public. I hope to see you there!

Coastal Erosion: How to Deal With It, And Why


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
The deck of the Ocean Mist, one of the most vulnerable local businesses to coastal erosion. (Photo by Bob Plain)

The Journal ran a story Sunday on Rhode Island’s new efforts to deal with coastal erosion. It’s a decent piece, but it understresses a couple of important points and misses a few more.

First, the problem of shore erosion has been and will continue to be intensified by sea level rises pushed by global warming, which, yes, is caused by people. In fact, we might do well to skip the middle man and just say that climate change, like Soylent Green, is people. People are accelerating the erosion of Rhode Island’s shore. That approach would be perhaps uncomfortably blunt, but the ProJo is suspiciously tactful on the matter. Their article mentions rising sea levels and worsening storms as if these phenomena are happening for no reason at all.

Second, it’s important to note that the problem of shore erosion requires collective action. We’re talking about a threat to common property–property no one in Rhode Island can own privately. Sure, private property is in danger, too, but the site of the first damage and of the bulwarks against further damage will be the commonly-owned shore. Towards the end, the article has an interesting thing to say about the different incentives posed by slow erosion and big emergencies, such as hurricanes, but it leaves understated the importance of the property status of Rhode Island’s shore.

Then there a couple of things left entirely unsaid. Most important among them is a question: what does Rhode Island want to do with its life?

The impetus for the ProJo piece are the actions being taken by RI’s Coastal Resources Management Council to combat shore erosion, mainly a $1.3 million study that will lead to a Special Area Management Plan. Much of the article focuses on the technical solutions to shore erosion the study may discover, but more important are the values the study will bring to the fore–the values of the people who live around Narragansett Bay. What do they actually want out of the Bay? What do they want it to do?

Other people, in other places, have expressed quite clear values in their approach to caring for their shores. Last month, North Carolina infamously, madly, risibly drafted a bill that would require the state to ignore accelerated sea level rise in its shore management planning. When this brand of stupidity makes it to the level of a state legislature and becomes formalized in actual legislation, it transforms into something more than stupidity: it’s now a value. North Carolinians prefer posturing against anthropogenic climate change to having a beautiful, healthy shore. It’s a choice.

We’ll see what choices Rhode Islanders make as the CRMC study develops.

The other thing–a very important thing–the ProJo article misses is the strong evidence that SAMPs can work. After the 2003 fish kill in Greenwich Bay, CRMC convened some big meetings to figure out what could be done to prevent such calamities. One of the outcomes was the Greenwich Bay Special Area Management Plan.

This plan called for, among other things, sewer tie-ins for homes by the shore. The problem that needed to be addressed was that nitrates from septic tanks leech into the Bay where they feed huge algae blooms, which, after they blossom, die and decompose. The bacteria that feed on the decomposing algae suck up massive amounts of oxygen, and this process can cause hypoxia, low-oxygen events that asphyxiate fish.

There is evidence that the Greenwich Bay SAMP has cleaned up the Bay. Warwick delivered lots of sewer tie-ins, and, in 2010, DEM and the Department of Health found that a large patch of water in front of Apponaug Cove, a patch of water closed for almost two decades on account of bad fecal coliform bacteria counts, had become clean enough to open for shellfishing.

That’s serious. The bacterial standard for shellfishing is more stringent than that for drinking water. So, by caring for the poor menhaden who died in 2003, the people who live around Narragansett Bay made a thick bed of quahaugs available for commercial harvest in 2010. In mid-December of that year, several hundred guys crammed into the water in front of Apponaug Cove to make a day’s pay digging quahaugs.

The Bay is interconnected. It’s complex. But it can be managed properly. It can be well-kept. The important thing to recognize is, not only can Rhode Islanders’ values be reflected in the actions they take with regard to the Bay, but these values will be reflected, no matter what.

Matunuck Plan Could Spell End for the Ocean Mist


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
The deck of the Ocean Mist. (photo by Bob Plain)

MATUNUCK — This coastal community in the far reaches of South Kingstown harbors all the working ingredients of a self-sustaining village. The corner store, surf shop, pizza parlor and hometown pubs play host to local residents, tourists and daily beach-goers every year.

In the heart of Matunuck village stands the Ocean Mist, sitting high on pilings above the Atlantic, a virtual dock of hedonism, enjoyed, remembered and revisited by people of all walks of life. Together, The Ocean Mist and village of Matunuck have evolved over the years.

“I wouldn’t be here without the people of Matunuck and the village wouldn’t be the same without the Ocean Mist. We are a community here, one that works together, says Kevin Finnegan, who’s owned the bar since 1988. Nodding to Tara’s, the Ocean Mist’s sister pub next door, Finnegan tells the story of a unique banding of peoples. “People come in here and migrate to Tara’s. They come back and forth. We work together – share coolers, customers, onions, whatever we need to do.”

Chuckling, Finnegan reminisced about his unabridged ride as the Captain of the ship and long-time resident of the village. “I’m from Providence, grew up in the city. I was fortunate that my parent’s had a house at Roy Carpenter’s beach. I spent all my summers here as a kid.”

Living at the beach house as soon as he was able to drive, Finnegan began his bid for the Ocean Mist. “It took four or five years, but I finally got the previous owners to sell it to me.” The bar which had previously only been seasonal, opened in May 1988 under Finnegan’s reign and has been open year-round ever since.

Now a full pub, breakfast haunt, live music venue and beach bar, an eclectic venue where all are welcome, the Ocean Mist is the community hub.

“The crowd is so diverse. Where can you sit down for a cold beer and have the hell’s angels to your right – a grandmother to your left? The mayor, the police, senators are all here together,” says Jack Hanley who’s worked for Finnegan since the beginning.

When asked his thoughts on the possibility of the Ocean Mist being washed out to sea, Hanley turned somber. “I would be heartbroken.”

The Ocean Mist is the first building in the line of defense against severe ocean tides and beach erosion in Matunuck.  The town, Coastal Resources Management, (CRMC), private property owner’s and environmental agencies are caught in a net of red tape that has tested the limits of time and Mother Nature. Finnegan and several property owners to the east on the tiny stretch of Matunuck shoreline are awaiting a resolution that will allow them to protect their properties.

“I have people who depend on me,” says Finnegan time and again. “My employees, vendors, the musicians, the list doesn’t end. I’m not just in this for myself. This is a community. If the Mist goes, the situation – erosion will just continue down the beach.”

The erosion issue, not unique to Matunuck is a growing concern up and down the east coast. Whether it be the shoreline of Block Island Sound, Long Island or Virginia Beach, coastal erosion and sea level rise have become a global concern. Those coastal areas occupied by homes and businesses, by families and communities are of critical concern.

Legal maneuverings, meetings, research and agendas are now taking Finnegan’s time away from the business that he has nurtured for more than 20 years.  When asked what he would be doing if the situation were resolved, Finnegan had a quiet answer for a quiet day at the beach.

“I’d be selling beer,” he said. “It’s what I do.”

CRMC Votes For South Kingstown Sea Wall


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

In a 9-0 vote, with one abstention the Coastal Resource Management Council in reconsidering the application of the Town of South Kingstown voted to approve the construction of a 202 ft sheet pile wall armament as a measure of protection for the sole access road into the seaside community of Matunuck.

Executive Director, Grover Fugate presented a four-prong approach for dealing with the critical erosion issues in Matunuck and other Rhode Island Coastal areas. The first prong, of immediate concern dealt with the “imminent peril situation” in Matunuck, presented by Town Manager, Stephen Alfred as a public health and safety concern for residents should Matunuck Beach Road infrastructure fail.

Calling upon the full Council to take action in support of public safety, Fugate proffered his plan. “It is an attempt to try and deal with the problem that is immediately before us.” Implemented as a stop gap measure, the 202 ft. armament was designed to shore up the critical segment of road presently exposed by severe and sustained erosion.

In his memo, dated May 4, 2012 to the Council in anticipation of the vote, Fugate cautioned, “Even if the town were to agree on some of the alternatives suggested at the hearings and in the staff reports, there is an implementation lag of 18-36 months. The road is already in a compromised state and one good coastal storm could significantly damage it.”

Attorney William Landry, representing Kevin Finnegan, owner of the Ocean Mist, as well as Francis O’Brien who owns Tara’s Pub, just east of the Ocean Mist property pleaded with the council to consider additional measures. Suggesting soft measures and a united approach to resolving the Town’s issue, Landry acknowledged the existent conditions.

“There is a vulnerable area west of the Ocean Mist at which the most severe erosion is occurring. Frankly, it may well be occurring because of the location of the Ocean Mist and the swirling effect of the water collecting in that area. That’s the area 40 ft. maybe tops where everyone is saying, we’re getting real close to the road here.”

Donald J. Packer, attorney for residents and abutters spoke in support of the Town’s proposal and presented the Council with the additional support of the trustees responsible for the parcel of land directly adjacent to the sheet pile wall placement.  Addressing his colleague’s indication that the Town didn’t have the ability or own the land south of the proposed armament, seaward, assured the council that his clients were on board. “I think that we can maybe put on the table in dealing with the condemnation issue, [they] are prepared to work with the Town and what’s necessary with the town to do what they need to do.”

Packer’s clients have been in previous discussion with Finnegan regarding a possible purchase of the property adjacent to the Ocean Mist on the west.  “Apparently there is nothing on the table at this point other than the Town’s proposal. My clients at this point are concerned that the road will be lost and are asking that this be approved.”

Several environmental advocacy groups appeared to testify before the council with each voicing its concern regarding hardened structures and while acknowledging the need for immediate action in the case of Matunuck.

The special exception granted and application approved, the question of time still weighs heavy on the residents of Matunuck. The Town will need to move through the necessary stages of approval with the State Department of Transportation in advancing the project. Utility lines, approved for relocation will be moved to the northern side of Matunuck Beach Road prior to commencing construction.

The Town’s timeline, per Alfred is for construction to begin the first week in September. Hurricane season will be underway and the hope is to have the project complete before another major storm wages war with what remains of the beach and headlands adjacent to the road.

CRMC recommendations moving forward include a comprehensive Special Area Management Plan (SAMP) for Rhode Island’s shoreline, monitoring and enforcement in designated areas and a cooperative effort of all individuals concerned with ongoing protection and mitigation efforts for the State’s barrier beaches.

Imminent Peril Reconsideration for Matunuck Beach Road


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

The Town of South Kingstown will once again appear before the Coastal Resources Management Council (CRMC) to plead its case in support of emergency construction of a 202 ft sheet pile wall/riprap armament structure along a crucial stretch of Matunuck Beach Road. The issue before the council: “imminent peril” for Matunuck residents should the road fail.

The original request filed in September 2011 was heard before the full council on April 10, 2012 and denied  as Town officials, residents and environmental concerns sought an alternative to construction.

The Town of South Kingstown whose responsibility for public health and welfare overshadows the issue of private property and shoreline protections, has expended approximately $45,000 in engineering expenses and clocked hundreds of man hours in its efforts to protect the road.

Primary concern for reconsideration is the critical state of a section of Matunuck Headlands shoreline wrought with years of sustained erosion from the waters of Block Island Sound to the south. The 202 ft. stretch of headlands directly abuts Matunuck Beach Road, the sole road and emergency services access to the homes and businesses to the east. The road infrastructure houses the community water line, also a public safety concern.

The hearing will take place in the South Kingstown High School auditorium at 6:00 pm tonight.

CRMC Issues Eleventh Hour Decision


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

The Coastal Resource Management Council (CRMC), after another evening filled with heated testimony, issued its decision on a request by the Town of South Kingstown to reclassify a portion of shoreline along Matunuck Beach Road. CRMC would not be forced to make a potentially precedential decision based on an eleventh hour situation being put before them for resolution.

In a 6-2 vote, the Council voted no, voicing concern with reclassifying the existing shoreline designation of “Coastal Headlands Bluffs and Cliffs” to that of a “manmade shoreline.”

Anthony Affigne, CRMC member, made his feelings clear from the moment he took his seat.

“I want to indicate a great deal of frustration with the 11th hour situation. “I went to Matunuck Beach Road. It is clear that the erosion has continued,” he said. Having conducted a site visit just prior to the meeting, Affigne was adamant in his contempt for the lack of prior mitigation sources.

“Town officials have known for decades and been aware for decades. We have our backs against the wall and [we] are being forced to make a decision,” argued Affigne. “We are here in a situation of imminent peril.”

The Town’s case, presented by Steve Alfred, who holds the titles of Town Manager and Public Safety Director, is also premised on imminent peril. The road leading into Matunuck is in danger of failure. The Town has been before the Council on several occasions concerning the Matunuck Headlands issue. The last on April 10, requesting approval for the construction of a sheet pile wall along a 202 ft. stretch of Matunuck Beach Road is pending reconsideration. The section of road in question housing the community’s water line is being compromised by storm surge and coastal erosion.

The April 10 hearing also ended in the Town’s application being struck down. Many residents, property owners and environmental watchdog agencies who testified in opposition, also opposed the reclassification. Some, represented by counsel, lent their support with limitations on restrictions and stipulations. The Town’s petition for reconsideration of the sheet pile wall application was tabled in light of the reclassification hearing and will be heard on May 8.

The reclassification to manmade shoreline, proposed for an approximately 1400 ft. stretch of coast, represented the Town’s efforts to assist property owners and residents attempting to erect protective measures along the southerly, seaward side of 11 affected parcels.

The current natural designation, usually attached to coastline along Type I waters, affords less opportunity for the placement of permanent protective structures for private property owners. The Coastal program specifically prohibits “construction on or alteration of coastal cliffs and bluffs and contiguous areas where such construction or alteration has a reasonable probability of causing or accelerating erosion or degrading a generally recognized scenic vista.”

Supportive of previous discussions with property owners, the Town adopted the posture that the change to “Manmade Shoreline” properly reflected the “historic character of portions of the Matunuck shoreline.” Manmade Shoreline is not typical of Type I water designation, another issue to be considered by the Council as the Matunuck Shoreline is Type I. The new designation, if approved, would have provided property owners an administrative vehicle providing for the construction of protective structures.

A mixture of business and residential concerns, two of the parcels of immediate concern house the Ocean Mist and Tara’s Pub, small businesses, whose owners are concerned not only for their properties and livelihood, but for that of their employees. In May 2011, the two businessmen submitted Preliminary Determination requests for construction of a combined sheet wall and riprap structure, seaward of their properties. Coastal storms and the combined efforts of all interested parties in reaching viable solutions had those applications tabled.

Represented by William Landry at the latest hearing, the business owner’s presented a case more supportive of beach nourishment, replenishment and conservation.  “We ask that we be given the opportunity to present an appropriate solution within the next year that involves beach replenishment and addresses compliance issues,” provided Landry, referencing the outstanding issue of coastal compliance violations.

Several environmental agencies came forth to testify in opposition to the reclassification. Calling forth visions of the Great Wall of China, each presented the issue of precedential caution. A decision in favor of reclassification would bring forth property owners up and down the coastline.

Brian Wagner, representing the Surfrider Foundation, Rhode Island Chapter, spoke against the erection of seawalls in general and opposed reclassification of shoreline in favor of private construction concerns. Wagner made it clear that the foundation was opposed to the reclassification and reconsideration requests, cautioning the Council. “It’s the first step down a very slippery slope.”

Tricia K. Jedele, representing the Conservation Law Foundation, cautioned the Council about making decisions not provided for in the CRMC Red Book. “Who has the ability to request a reclassification? Can the Town request it? Can any individual who owns coastal property request a reclassification?” she asked. “Your program is not clear.”

What was clear, was the report prepared by CRMC staff in advance of the Council’s reclassification decision. A change to manmade shoreline would have to include stipulations concerning any subsequent construction and Army Corp of Engineers involvement.

The Council, now faced with a reclassification request absent the proposed hard structure wall, replaced with a beach replenishment proposal of sorts – a flip-flop on issues, seemed perplexed. “Had a request for replenishment been submitted, it would have been signed the next day,” responded Grover Fugate, CRMC Director.

Was there ever a Great Wall of China on the table or was there actually a Chinese Wall – a veritable lack of connection put in place by opposing side’s inability to communicate? The turnout of residents, Town officials, environmentalists, conservationists and the litany of attorneys tells the story. Place the Great Wall proposal on the shelf and consider the Chinese Wall breached. There has been a call to the table.

Open for discussion are many questions concerning the future of the seaside community of Matunuck.  Is there an issue of imminent peril? Will the road fail? How does the Town provide for public health and safety, absent the ability to protect Matunuck Beach Road? When and how will beach replenishment be accomplished?

Perhaps the most important question is one without immediate answer. “Will New England’s changing weather patterns afford Matunuck the benefit of a year’s time?”

The seaside community escaped the wrath of a harsh New England winter. Time and weather, as virtual unknowns for the future, a decision has to be made.

“You’ve got everybody’s attention,” said Landry. “Golden moments fly.”

 

RI Progress Report: Congrats to Tear and Ryherd


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Congratulations to Allan Tear and Soren Ryherd, who will each be awarded innovation fellowships from the Rhode Island Foundation. The two entrepreneurs will receive grants for $300,000 over the next three years for their winning projects that will – hopefully – help revitalize Rhode Island’s struggling economy.

David Cicilline apologizes for misleading voters about the fiscal stability of the Capital City as the former mayor ran for Congress in 2010.

A lawyer for Google said Rhode Island’s US Attorney Peter Neronha had gone “off the reservation” when he accused CEO and search engine co-founder Larry Page of knowing about illegal activity by the internet behemoth.

Welcome to the Buffett Rule beat, Dan McGowan! Also today, the New York Times editorial board weighs in on Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse’s bill.

This just in: “Hundreds of nurses and their fellow union members at Women & Infants Hospital are picketing today and calling on Hospital administrators to improve staffing levels by lifting a months-long hiring freeze and hiring local nurses for permanent positions – instead of staffing with temporary, subcontracted “traveler” nurses as proposed.”

The CRMC sided with the Ocean Mist and several environmental groups and didn’t allow South Kingstown to construct a steel wall between the beach and Matunuck Beach Road.

Newt Gingrich bounces a check to Utah.

One of the weirder things about the deal Bob Flanders struck with Central Falls retirees is that it required the General Assembly to sign off on a $2.6 million bailout to the retired employees who had their pensions cut.

This page may be updated throughout the day. Click HERE for an archive of the RI Progress Report.