Doherty Declines Invite to Debate Civil Rights


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Brendan Doherty

Evidently a debate on civil rights isn’t something Brendan Doherty thinks would be helpful to his campaign.

The Republican ex-cop is the only CD1 candidate not to accept an invitation to a debate being hosted by the Rhode Island Civil Rights Roundtable, billed by the group as “an opportunity to hear these candidates debate issues related to civil rights and equality, as they respond to a questions about current federal matters and legislation.”

Both Democrat David Cicilline and independent David Vogel will discuss these issues.

Said Democratic Party spokesman Bill Fischer about Doherty’s dodge, “It’s astounding that a candidate running for U.S. Congress would avoid an opportunity to discuss issues of importance to so many Rhode Islanders, including minorities and women: affordable housing, education, the DREAM Act, health care, the Violence Against Women Act, and discrimination.”

I disagree. I don’t think it’s astounding at all. In fact, I would have been surprised if Doherty had accepted the invitation as he against what a majority of Rhode Islanders believe in on these issues.

Just look at some of the topics, provided by the Roundtable group, that they will ask candidates about: affordable housing; Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA); education; the Dream Act; the Affordable Care Act; End Racial Profiling Act; Violence Against Women Act (VAWA); and voter ID laws.

That’s like a greatest hits list of topics Brendan Doherty doesn’t want Rhode Island to know where he stands on!!

Also, it’s interesting to note that one of the policy issues, the Violence Against Women Act, has been a source of sparring between the Cicilline and Doherty campaigns. Cicilline has accused Doherty of not supporting the bill and Doherty’s campaign has said he doesn’t because it offers protections to transgender people.

The debate is tomorrow morning from 9:00am to 10:30am at the Casey Family Services at 1268 Eddy St. in Providence.

 

An Independent For 1st Congressional District


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

My name is David Vogel, and on November 6, my name will be on the ballot as an Independent candidate for Congress from the First Congressional District for the State of Rhode Island.

Being raised in a New York-style Jewish household meant that, nearly by default, my upbringing would be modern liberalism with a healthy integration of old-world sensibilities; growing up in Rhode Island ensured that I would be a Democrat.

Then why am I running as an Independent?

Observing our government in action has led me to the conclusion that even for the most progressive of people, being a part of one of the two main parties is a stifling experience. If you “belong” to one side or to the other, you are expected (if not required) to do the party’s bidding; this is made worse by the mounting evidence that each of the parties is expected (if not required) to do the bidding of the industries that are throwing the most money at Congress via the process of lobbying. There is no room for overall progress because, for those to whom the word “service” is not an empty pair of syllables, the opportunity to solve problems through thought, common sense, and collaborative effort is replaced entirely by party-driven rhetoric and propaganda.

A federal government has the responsibility of acting as a steward for a nation, and is not supposed to treat its constituents as little more than a convenient resource to be exploited. As long as big money dominates politics, it is nearly delusional to believe that by simply complaining loudly enough, “We The People” somehow will get entrenched partisans to understand that something better is being demanded.

This is why, in concert with my view of what it means to be an Independent, I am not asking anyone for any money. My inherent inability to flood the airwaves with canned sound bites and vacuous platitudes means I must find some other way to get your attention. But that’s o.k., because I would rather give you a reason to like me…. it’s just how I think. I believe there are people out there who will appreciate that rather than hide from the issues or dodge their questions or ignore their concerns, I will discuss anything you like, will give you my unvarnished opinion, and will not be afraid to say to you “I don’t know enough about that issue to give you an answer at this moment, but will be happy to resume the dialogue after I perform the research necessary to educate myself appropriately.”

Our nation likes to remind itself that innovation, along with a never-say-die attitude, is an enormous source of our collective pride; that same principle should apply to how we choose our public servants. If you are of the opinion that partisan politics is failing the people of this nation, and if you believe that the focus of government must be upon “we” instead of upon “me,” then I ask you to veer away from partisan politicians, and to vote for a candidate whose only obligation would be to the voters.