Buffett Rule Is Back


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Sen Sheldon Whitehouse talks with Rhode Islanders last year about improving the economy. (Photo by Bob Plain)

The Buffett Rule is back in play inside in the beltway.

Author of last year’s signature piece of progressive legislation in Congress, Senator Sheldon Whitehouse announced today that his 2012 Paying A Fair Share Act, aka the Buffett Rule bill, will be a component in Senate Democrats plan stave off the sequester.

It’s a common-sense addition to any deficit-reduction plan, and I’m glad it has been adopted by Senate leadership,” Whitehouse said in a statement released today.  “I would have preferred to focus even more on loophole-closing in our effort to replace the sequester, and I hope to have an opportunity to improve the plan as the process goes forward.”

The Buffett Rule, so named because billionaire Warren Buffett has mocked the US income tax code because he pays a lower rate than his secretary, would guarantee that millionaires would pay at least 30 percent in taxes. It would raise more than $50 billion over ten years and affect a very small percentage of Americans.

 

Anchor Rising: Empty Land Being Disenfranchised


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Rural areas were over-privileged and now they’re not, so now they’re disenfranchised.

This seems to be the gist of Marc Comtois’ Anchor Rising post lamenting the rise of the one-person/one-vote system that helped end centuries of disenfranchisement of urban, nonwhite, poor voters. Marc even has a handy map of the counties of the United States and how they voted.

Except there’s a problem. That map is at least 12 years old. Snopes even has a thread for it, which is the leading Google Image result I found searching “2012 election by county”. Here’s Mr. Comtois’s selected map:

For comparison, here’s a county-level map created by Mark Newman at the University of Michigan:

Many more swathes of blue. Of course, land can’t vote, people do, so if you create a cartogram; a map of the United states based on population by county (which Mr. Newman has):

I could go on like this, by Mr. Newman really has done it all already, so I suggest clicking the link above and reading it. All of that is to look at Mr. Comtois’ point: that rural communities’ interests are being subjugated to the demands of the urban/suburban citizens by dint of those areas having larger populations. Mr. Comtois points out that Rhode Island’s Bloodless Revolution ended a system of having senators represent towns and cities instead of districts, essentially creating a smaller version of the House of Representatives.

He’s right on that score. But he’s conveniently ignored the history that made taking control of the Senate so vital; as Republican control of the state had slipped away, Republicans had placed more and more power in the Senate, making the Governor’s office largely ceremonial. Modern Republicans decry Democratic politics as machine politics, but Rhode Island Democrats learned their trade at the hands of Republicans, who so corruptly ran this state that they earned us the famous “a state for sale, and cheap” quote that haunts Rhode Island politics to this day.

Rhode Island’s history is filled with rural communities actively disenfranchising urban communities; rural communities tend to be filled with landholders while urban communities tend to be filled with renters. Rural areas are whiter and of greater Yankee stock; urban areas tend to be less white and of immigrant backgrounds. Thus property requirements for voting enfranchised rural voters while disenfranchising urban voters. It took direct actions like the Dorr Rebellion and tricks of parliamentary procedure like the Bloodless Revolution to finally end that.

Losing the over-representation that rural communities had, almost always at the expense of the poor, urban, and immigrant doesn’t equate to disenfranchisement. It’s equality. Republicans appear to be having issues with that; for instance, the U.S. House of Representatives is so disproportionate thanks to the redistricting process that Democratic House candidates actually won more votes than Republican House candidates. By virtue of living in a Republican district, your vote was worth more. The U.S. Congress is currently apportioned to favor the rural voter over the urban voter. That Rhode Island’s government doesn’t follow suit is a good thing.

RI Legislation More Religious Than Rhode Islanders


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Religion in Rhode Island is a political force to be reckoned with, according to conventional wisdom, but reality demonstrates otherwise. The only opposition to marriage equality in the state is based on the medieval religious beliefs of a small number of Catholics and Evangelicals who somehow hold an inordinate sway over key members of our General Assembly.

Rep. Karen MacBeth has reintroduced the odious and embarrassing ultrasound bill meant to erect new barriers between a woman and her right to access legal health care. The motivation for this bill is religious, and has nothing to do with preserving women’s health.

This state of affairs is doubly ridiculous because Rhode Island is just not that religious. A Gallop Poll released yesterday  shows Rhode Island as being tied with Oregon as the fifth least religious state in the country. Only Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Vermont are less religious.

In all, 29% of Rhode Islanders identify as very religious, 27% identify as moderately religious, and a whopping 44% identify at nonreligious. I know that the nonreligious don’t want religion warping politics and legislation in our state, and I also know that many who identify as moderately or even very religious also respect the Constitution of the United States and the sanctity of the separation of church and state.

The message to our legislators and other elected officials could not be more clear: Rhode Island is a secular state, our religious beliefs are our private concerns, and we don’t want religion in our laws.

My Year With RI Future


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

February 14th is Valentine’s Day, but it’s also the day my first RI Future article “Beyond Occupy” was published a year ago. Since that article, 111 others were published, not including this one. A year ago I was among the uncounted unemployed, meaning I didn’t add into the “official” unemployment rate. Today, I’m merely underemployed (which feels a hell of a lot better). A year ago 38 Studios was just launching its first game. Today the company no longer exists. My fortunes rose while others’ collapsed.

A year ago Brian Hull was the owner-editor of RI Future. Today it’s Bob Plain. The common wisdom a year ago was that David Cicilline was on his way to defeat. Most recently, he was once again sworn into the U.S. House of Representatives for his second term. Things change. Things change fast.

Sometimes I’ve written things that on reflection I’ve thought better of. I’ve probably trashed or left incomplete about a sixth of what I’ve written on this site. Not every idea I’ve ever had is fully-baked or thought through when I sit down to write it. Sometimes that will lead to a trashed article. Occasionally it leads to bad article.

I don’t always get to write with all the facts in front of me. I’m not a journalist, though occasionally I’ve tried to be. One of the best things about writing for RI Future is getting to meet the journalists of this state, a group of people who I really respect, and have them know me from my work (or Twitter). Actually, that strangers have read and liked something I wrote really makes me smile. That’s better than a whole host of valentines.

But when I’m wrong, I appreciate being called out (though yes, I may very well argue with you). I’m wrong often enough that I know better than to believe in my own infallibility. In fact, there are cases where I’d appreciate being called out more often.

And sometimes I’m needlessly caustic. That happens. This is a political blog, and they say politics is one of those things that you shouldn’t talk about around the kitchen table. But politics is also one of those fast-moving things. The people who hate you one day may be singing your praises the next. That said, political people are often like elephants: they rarely forget. And there are a lot of mean elephants up on Smith Hill. There’s also a lot of nice people too.

I describe myself as “a pessimistic optimist” in my little author bio down below. Despite the ways I feel about our politics or our economic situation; despite the fact that I’m not really sure what the solutions are, I’m optimistic that it’s going to better. Because I have faith in this state.

That’s probably been my favorite part of writing for RI Future. I’ve never loved the name of the blog, or the masthead, or the WordPress theme it’s in (no offense). But to me, at its heart, this is a blog about the love of Rhode Island, written by people who want it to be better than it already is. I get to express that love for this state here and have quite a lot of people read it. That’s amazing to me.

When I was in college in North Carolina, my friends said to me, “you really love your state.” And I said, “yeah, but everyone loves their state.” And the response was, “not the way you love yours.” Perhaps that’s true, but I don’t believe it’s unique to me. I believe it’s a quality of Rhode Islanders. I really hate the people who say “I can’t wait to leave this state!” My response is: good riddance, we don’t need you here bringing the rest of down. Rhode Island isn’t a project of government overreach or some kind of conspiracy to make people dependent on the Democratic Party as our detractors claim. If you can’t understand what we we are, why are you here?

Rhode Island is an act of optimism, an act of divine providence, an act of hope. I’m glad I’ve had a year to share that with you. And I hope you’ll stay with RI Future, that you’ll make it daily reading, and share in that hope.