ACLU: primary produced four voter ID law ‘problems’


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Virginia Chafee shows her id to a poll worker.
Virginia Chafee, the governor’s mother, shows her id to a poll worker.

A Providence woman was denied the right to vote, according to an ACLU press release which details four incidents in which Rhode Island’s controversial voter ID law caused problems at the polls on primary day.

“An elderly Hispanic woman who did not have identification was turned away from voting in Providence,” says the press release. “According to a poll watcher, the warden wrongly told her ‘even for a provisional ballot, you need an ID.’ The woman left without casting a ballot. The warden confirmed to the poll watcher that this was her understanding of the rules.”

The woman did not give her name, and did not speak with the poll watcher, said Johanna Kaiser, an ACLU spokeswoman. “Under the law, any person without proper ID is supposed to be given a provisional ballot, and if the signature they provide matches the one on their voter registration, the ballot ends up getting counted.” said the ACLU press release.

The ACLU had approximately 12 poll watchers at voting locations in Rhode Island and identified four “problems” – three on election day and one with an early voter.

According to the press release, a man casting an emergency ballot the day before the primary “was initially not given a provisional ballot, but instead was told he was unable to vote because he did not have proper identification. He got to vote only because another person waiting in line, who was familiar with the law’s requirement, forcefully advocated on the voter’s behalf.”

Here’s how the ACLU described the other two incidents:

  • “A Providence man with an expired license was initially told he could not vote. He told the ACLU that poll workers did not give him a provisional ballot until he showed them in writing that provisional ballots are available to voters without proper identification.”
  • “Poll workers in Pawtucket denied a voter a provisional ballot when he did not show photo ID. The voter, who was aware of his right to such a ballot, explained the law to the workers, who then had to call a supervisor. It then took poll workers 45 minutes to determine how to administer a provisional ballot, according to the voter.”

Said Steve Brown, executive director of the RI ACLU: “The voter ID law was promoted by the Secretary of State as necessary to address an alleged perception of voter fraud. Yet the implementation of this law is in fact, not in perception, denying qualified voters the right to vote. That is where the real concern should be, and why the law should be repealed.”

Kaiser added, “We will again be sending letters to the the Board of Elections raising concerns about poll workers not being given clear enough instructions about their obligations under the law, and urging the Board to address this before the November election. The ACLU and other organizations sent letters to the Board ahead the primary, but to our knowledge the Board took no further action.”

Help the Providence Student Union win $100,000


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

psuIf you’re a fan of the Providence Student Union (PSU) and our work to build student power and fight for stronger public schools, then we need your help!

PSU has been nominated for the Nellie Mae Education Foundation’s Larry O’Toole Award. If we get the most online votes out of the six groups nominated, we will win $100,000.

You read that correctly – $100,000!

But we got a late start on voting and need your help: please take 10 seconds now to vote for PSU here.

PSU’s student leaders have accomplished so much on a shoestring budget. They’ve stopped a school closing, expanded student bus passes, led the successful campaign to pass a moratorium on high-stakes testing, and much more. So think about what we could achieve with $100,000!

Winning the Larry O’Toole Award would allow us to expand our organizing work and strengthen our youth-led movement for student-centered learning across Rhode Island.

We would use these funds to support students at every high school in Providence, and to increase our capacity to work with students elsewhere in Rhode Island who want to form their own student unions.

In short, this award would allow PSU to create an unprecedented foundation for youth voice in education policy-making. If that sounds like something you support, here’s what we need you to do:

  1. Take 10 seconds right now to vote for PSU!
  2. Forward this link to 10 friends who also support student voice!
  3. Share this with any groups or organizations you’re involved with who have a stake in improving our public schools!

Thanks so much for your support.

NARAL Pro-Choice chides Sen. Whitehouse on judicial nominee


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse at Forward on Climate rally
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse at Forward on Climate rally
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse  (Photo by Jack McDaid.)

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse has an A rating with NARAL Pro-Choice America. But the group isn’t thrilled with Rhode Island’s most progressive member of Congress because he plans to support Georgia judicial nominee Michael Boggs.

“There’s a judicial nominee who would be a huge threat to reproductive rights if he’s confirmed,” says an action email from NARAL-Pro Choice yesterday. “And your U.S. senator, Sheldon Whitehouse, just came out in support of him.”

“Whitehouse has gone out on a limb opposing judicial nominees because of their hostility to reproductive rights in the past,” says the email. “He should have been one of the first senators speaking up against Boggs’ nomination – but instead, he’s the first pro-choice senator to support Boggs.”

Whitehouse told RI Future his support for Boggs’ nomination is based purely on Senate tradition of “deferring to the judgment of home state Senators.”

“I share the concerns of many about Michael Boggs’s record as a legislator in Georgia, and I strongly disagree with many of the positions he has taken,” he said. “For District Court vacancies, there is a long tradition in the Senate of deferring to the judgment of home state Senators, when both Senators agree on the nominee – as is the case with Mr. Boggs.  I have expected this deference when it comes to nominees in my own state, and I generally hold myself to the same standard to which I have held others.  I’m continuing to weigh my concerns about Mr. Boggs’s record with my respect for this Senate principle, and have not made a decision about how I will vote.”

Boggs is up for a lifetime appointment to the US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, and his nomination was thought to be all but over, with many wondering why Boggs continues to fight for a seat he so obviously will not get. However, Whitehouse’s support could change all that.

As a member of the Georgia House of Representatives, Boggs voted “to keep the confederate insignia on the Georgia state flag, to tighten restrictions on access to abortion and to ban same-sex marriage.” Boggs has also defended voter ID laws similar to those the Obama administration is challenging in Texas. One wonders what Obama was thinking in nominating a man so obviously unfit to be a judge.

Whitehouse has laid out his logic in backing Boggs, but supporters of little things like Human Rights are finding small comfort in the senator’s explanation. According to Todd Ruger at RollCall, Whitehouse,

…said in an interview on Tuesday that he backs district court nominees who have the support of their home-state senators.

Whitehouse said he spoke on the Senate floor in 2010 of the “powerful spirit of deference” to home-state senators, as Republicans tried to filibuster U.S. District Judge John McConnell for the federal bench in the District of Rhode Island. McConnell was confirmed in 2011.“It would be inconsistent of me to depart from that now,” Whitehouse said.

Given that Whitehouse has an A rating from NARAL and is generally considered a progressive, he should know better than to support Boggs. Call Senator Whitehouse to let him know that you oppose Michael Bogg’s confirmation at 401-453-5294. You can also sign NARAL’s online petition here.

NEARI President Larry Purtill tepid on Raimondo


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
NEA-RI President Larry Purtill
NEA-RI President Larry Purtill

Larry Purtill, elected president of NEARI, the state’s largest teachers’ union, says Gina Raimondo would have won a two-way race, but he isn’t ready to throw his support behind her just yet.

“First, the Treasurer probably would have won if there was only one other candidate so except for a few in the media who like to beat up on us, it is a moot point,” Purtill told me.

He made clear he would not support Cranston Mayor Allan Fung, who won the GOP primary for governor. “Obviously, Allan’s position on right to work pretty much eliminates him,” he said.

But said that doesn’t mean he will support Raimondo. “The pension issue aside, Gina’s positions on mayoral academies and funding, teacher evaluation, high stakes testing, how she handles a Dept. Of Ed that teachers remain very skeptical of, her support for collective bargaining need to be out there for us. As of now, we certainly are very non committal.”

He added, “This is where I am and believe NEARI members are. I would hope that anyone who has followed the pension issue or the primary would know we would not just jump in because someone is a Democrat.”

Mark Gray, president of the Young Democrats, posted yesterday pointing out Raimondo’s progressive credentials.

He wrote: “For Rhode Island liberals, it’s taken as an article of faith that Raimondo is a conservative wolf in Democratic sheep’s clothing, based only on her (successful? we’ll see) attempt to stop the state’s runaway public employees’ pension train. The fact that this notion is so pervasive among progressives is a testament to how much unions—especially public sector unions—dominate the Liberal/Progressive scene here in Rhody Land.”

RI delegation on Obama’s ISIS speech


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

obama isisWhile Rhode Islanders were still celebrating or commiserating their candidate’s primary performance earlier this week, President Barack Obama was addressing the nation about his plans to “destroy” ISIS without putting more troops on the ground.

Here’s his 15 minute speech:

Taking the nation’s temperature, The New York Times reports this headline: “Weary of War, but Favoring Airstrike Plan”. It could as easily apply to Rhode Island’s congressional delegation.

All four supported additional airstrikes and, for various reasons, agreed more troops on the ground would be counterproductive. Here are each of their full statements.

Senator Jack Reed (senior member of the Senate Armed Services Committee):

“Tonight, the President made a clear, compelling case that denying these terrorists safe havens will require a targeted, smart, and sustained multi-national effort.

“Like many Americans, I am skeptical of deeper military involvement that could lead to an open-ended conflict.  I don’t want to see more U.S. combat troops on the ground because I think that is what ISIL wants: to try to bog us down in a bloody and costly fight that helps them recruit more terrorists.  Indigenous forces on the ground are going to have to step up.

“This President’s deliberate and thoughtful strategy ensures we will not repeat the mistakes of rushing into ground combat as we did in Iraq in 2003.  Instead, he developed a comprehensive strategy that includes our allies in the region, together with the force of our diplomatic power, intelligence capabilities, and targeted military might.”

Congressman David Cicilline (A member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Cicilline received a national security briefing from Administration officials on Thursday, before issuing this statement):

“Last night, President Obama addressed the nation and outlined a comprehensive strategy to defeat the terrorist group known as the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant, including increased U.S. military action in the region and military and technical support for our allies. The President reaffirmed his position that our response will not include U.S. combat troops on the ground and the President made clear he has no plans to do so. I strongly support this position.

“It is clear that ISIL poses a serious threat to U.S. national security interests in the region and has expressly threatened the American homeland, and we must do everything we can to prevent another terrorist attack on American soil. We must also remain vigilant as a nation and ensure we’re fully equipped to respond to all threats against America or American personnel. The President laid out a thoughtful strategy to work with Iraqi and Kurdish forces on the ground, as well as a broader international coalition, to defeat this grave danger to U.S. national security interests and regional stability.”

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (Whitehouse visited Syria in January 2013):

“After a decade of war, I share the concerns of many Rhode Islanders about further military engagement, but I also share their alarm over the rising influence of ISIL and their horror over the brutal tactics used by these extremists.  I will continue to oppose the deployment of regular ground troops, but we must take seriously ISIL’s ruthless beheading of Americans, its threat to U.S. personnel and facilities in the region, and its ability to capture territory and resources to conduct terrorist attacks.  I believe the plan outlined by the President tonight – to build a coalition of regional partners and work with the newly formed Iraqi government to drive ISIL out of that country – is the right approach.  I also support expanding our efforts to provide military advice and airstrikes, and arming moderate rebels in Syria – a step I first called for after visiting the region early last year.  Syria and ISIL present a complex set of problems to which there are no easy answers, but I believe President Obama is pursuing the best set of options available to us at this time.

Congressman Jim Langevin (senior member of the House Armed Services Committee and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence):

“The threat posed by ISIS demands the world’s attention and action. They are the very definition of extremist, and their brutality knows no bounds. They have perpetrated unspeakable acts of violence against innocent people, including women, children and religious minorities who have been targeted for their refusal to adhere to an extreme and dangerous set of principles cloaked in religious sentiment.

“Intelligence officials estimate that thousands of Americans and Europeans have joined ISIS fighters, and these individuals could return home with the intent of doing harm to the United States and our allies.

“This terrorist threat, combined with existing sectarian tensions and an Iraqi government that, until now, has marginalized too many of its people, has created a complex challenge in the region, and it will take a multifaceted, collaborative effort to ultimately defeat ISIS. That approach must include a more inclusive government in Iraq, and I am encouraged by the improvements we are starting to see on that front.

“Like so many of my constituents, I do not want to see the United States embroiled in another ground war in the Middle East. We have learned over the past 13 years from our mistakes in Iraq. But on the eve of September 11, a date so deeply ingrained in the minds and hearts of Americans, we remember where we have been, and can see a clearer path forward. Evil cannot be left unchallenged. I applaud the President’s speech tonight as a first step towards addressing this threat, and I appreciate his commitment to working with Congress and keeping the American people informed. Going forward, I expect to hear further details of the timing and scope of the strategy he proposes, and I will continue to exercise rigorous oversight of the military commitment to come.

“The challenges we face are tremendous, but in the face of this adversity, the United States of America is ready to lead a broad coalition of partners in the region and worldwide to address the threat posed by ISIS. And as we face this threat, I continue to be so grateful to the brave men and women of our military. To the service members here and abroad, and to the troops that will join this effort to defeat ISIS, thank you for your tireless commitment to preserving freedom and protecting our country.”