OpenDoors shows the potential to decrease recidivism


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

“Everybody wins,” comments journalist Bill Rappleye in the NBC 10 piece about prison reform that aired on Friday. That optimism is not something that is usually included in journalism about prison these days.  Senator Whitehouse’s leadership on this issue has attracted positive attention recently, including another ProJo article in which Whitehouse visited the ACI Sociology class that produces the Prison Op/Ed Project.

Whitehouse’s current legislation promises some of the most substantive federal criminal justice reforms in decades and just passed the Senate Judiciary Committee.  Some elements of the law are only as good as the rehabilitative programs they support, and NBC 10 featured a program here in RI that is proving that success is possible: the 9 Yards program run by OpenDoors.

cintron Wilfredo Cintron, a 9 Yards graduate who was profiled by Rappleye, had been in  and out of prison for over ten years.  “19 months–that’s the longest stretch I’ve  been out. And I want to keep it that way, I want to keep going,” he says.    Cintron’s success is no small feat for him, and it shows the potential for transformation with the right support.  I met Wilfredo on July 8, 2013, the first  day of the 9 Yards program.  He described that day in the full interview that he gave with Bill Rappleye, saying “I almost walked out, I was thinking that this was  just going to be a waste of my time. But I didn’t, and that was the best decision I  think I’ve made in my life.”

9 Yards is a new, unique prisoner reentry program that provides long term, comprehensive support.  I am the Program Director, and when we started 9 Yards the hope was that we could provide enough assistance to participants that they could actually break the cycle of crime and incarceration for good.  9 Yards  started with funding from the Governor’s Workforce Board.  It provides  academic support, vocational training, and counseling to small groups of  participants in Medium Security prison for around six months.  If they work hard in prison, they get a big helping hand when they get out–transitional supportive housing, case management, and employment coaching for at least six months after release.  You can read more about the program, see videos, and read our report, here.  Not many programs can provide so much, and Wilfredo is proof of what is possible if each element is in place.

The experience of runningluis.hand.still this program and working with men such as Wilfredo has  changed the way I look at this issue dramatically.  Most importantly, it’s  taught me  that rehabilitation is possible but extremely hard.  I remember when I  first started  working with Wilfredo it was tough just to get him to come to class. He would agree  with me that he needed to work harder one moment, and then  next moment he’d be  making up excuses to leave. High expectations and work  ethic are not part of the  normal culture in prison, where people spend years  passing the time, staring at a tv  screen, waiting for their life to re-start.

Wilfredo’s present accomplishments began in a small classroom in Medium Security prison, where he started coming to class almost every day, often without me telling him to. When we began, he tested at a middle school reading and writing level. He had previously enrolled at CCRI several times, each time testing into remedial classes and then dropping out. After months of tutoring, he tested into accredited CCRI classes and proceeded to earn his first six CCRI credits. At the same time, he got something even more valuable than credits–self confidence and hope. “9 Yards helped me remember how smart I really am,” he once told me.

All of the work Wilfredo did was nothing compared to the challenges he faced when he was released 19 months ago. Despite his changes and his dreams of a new path, he was immediately faced with the exact same life that had led him to prison two years ago: bad habits, a temper, tons of stress, people he had let down, people trying to bring him down, few marketable skills, and a society that was constantly slamming the door in his face. After two weeks he was couch surfing, broke, and almost certainly on his way back to jail.

He then moved into the second phase of the 9 Yards program. I ran and lived in the transitional house that he moved into at the time, and so I witnessed each difficult day. He told me about running into his old acquaintances everywhere he went and forcing himself to delete their phone numbers from his phone. He applied for job after job, sure he would be able to find work on his own, only to be turned down each time due to his record. Only after our intern spent two weeks going door to door for him did we find someone willing to hire him (and that was only with the help of RI’s Work Immersion program, which subsidized his hire). He has been at the job every week since then. The day after he was released, we went to a culinary arts program to get him signed up for training.  Six months and probably fifty hours of leg-work later, after being denied entry into training three times by two different agencies, we got him into the CCRI program, which he has now graduated from.

At each step, change was painstaking. He learned to dress differently, swapping his oversized sports-caps and baggy jeans for clothes that fit his new life. He got better at accepting advice and criticism. He gradually earned back the trust of his family. He relearned things as simple as saying please and thank you.

Each phase of 9 Yards works only because it is a collaboration with the criminal justice system. Without time in prison to refocus, Wilfredo would never have taken the steps he did prior to release. He was released about three months early from prison by the RI Parole Board, which paroled him to 9 Yards. Without the supervision and strict conditions of parole, its hard to say if he would have been able to resist the pull of negative influences, and during several difficult situations he commented to me that it was a good thing that he was on parole. But with these systems in place, working in collaboration with intensive reentry support, success stories such as Wilfredo’s are possible. As Senator Whitehouse said in the Projo last week, “‘There is not going to be a big flood of money into the programs,’ unless the programs are shown to work well.”  But when they work well, everybody wins.

ACLU sues state over level 3 sex offender residency law


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

ACLU Residency LawsuitThe American Civil Liberties Union of Rhode Island (ACLU) today filed a class action lawsuit in U.S. District Court to challenge the constitutionality of a recently enacted law that makes it a crime for certain sex offenders to reside within 1,000 feet of a school. As part of the suit, the ACLU has requested a restraining order to halt the law’s “inconsistent” and “arbitrary” implementation before any more individuals are uprooted or made homeless.

The new statute, passed overwhelmingly in the Rhode Island House of Representatives under the leadership of Speaker Nicholas Mattiello, is unconstitutional on three grounds, says Attorney John MacDonald, who filed the suit with Attorney Lynette Labringer today.

The statute is unconstitutionally vague, says MacDonald, with no definition of what constitutes a school in the law. Further, there are no guidelines offered as to how to measure the 1000 feet required under the mandate. Different law enforcement agencies use different systems operating under different parameters. A resident might be told he is safe by one agency, only to be ordered to move by another.

The law is unconstitutional because it violates due process. Level 3 sex offenders are banished from their property and their liberty under this statute, says MacDonald, and they have no recourse to a hearing unless they want to be arrested and charged in violation of the law.

The third constitutional violation occurs because under this statute, people who have already paid for their crimes are being further punished in having to move under threat of arrest.

The statute does not increase public safety, says MacDonald, and the homeless advocates in attendance at the press conference all agreed with this assessment. It is better to know where level 3 sex offenders are living, “but we have uprooted them and sent them to Harrington Hall, the only place that can house them.”

Jim Ryczek, who heads up the Rhode Island Coalition for the Homeless (RICH), is in full support of the lawsuit. “We are proud to have helped keep communities safe,” said Ryczek, adding that the three factors that keep people from re-offending are stable housing, employment and treatment. The law, if it is allowed to stand, threatens all three of these factors.

Not only is there no evidence that this law might help Rhode Islanders, this law “may have an opposite effect” says Ryczek.

Sol Rodriguez, executive director of OpenDoors, read her statement, saying, “People affected are being forced out of their apartments; some are homeowners, have families, are sick, disabled, and some live in nursing homes. Some are family caretakers. They have served the sentence imposed for their crimes and are known to law enforcement due to sex offender registry laws. This law will further destabilize this population.”

Jean M. Johnson is executive director of House of Hope CDC which manages Harrington Hall. Presently, this is the only facility that can house homeless, level 3 sex offenders in the state. During Wednesday night’s rain storm, “160 gentlemen inhabited Harrington Hall,” she said, “we are a 120 bed facility. We have always had level 1, 2 and 3 offenders stay with us. We are the shelter of last resort, we don’t turn anyone away.”

On Monday night, when the law is to be in full effect, 30 level 3 sex offenders could show up at Harrington Hall, in Speaker Mattiello’s district.

The new law, says Johnson, is “unjust and unfair.”

Beyond the issues of constitutionality and public safety, says Steve Brown, executive director of the RI ACLU, the law makes no sense. Many level 3 sex offenders were convicted for crimes against adults, and against adults they knew personally. These men are presently allowed to travel near and be around schools, but under the law are not allowed to keep in an apartment near a school, when the schools are empty.

As far as simply finding an apartment elsewhere, this is not really an option, said Jim Ryczek. Many landlords will not rent to a level 3 sex offender. Finding an affordable location that satisfies the 1000 feet limit in the amount of time available is all but impossible.

In Providence, 30 men have been told that they will have to move. A reporter at the press conference said that Speaker Mattiello was “getting pressure” to address the situation at Harrington Hall, but Jean Johnson said that no one from the Speaker’s office has reached out to her.

More information is available here.

Patreon