Wage theft law gets teeth


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
2015-12-22 Teriyaki House 20
Wage theft action at Teriyaki House last year

Wage theft in Rhode Island may be a much bigger problem than robbery.  And, as Steve Ahlquist previously reported, even high profile violators may be getting away with a slap on the wrist with workers left with little recourse.

Thanks to a bill introduced by Representative Shekarchi and Senator Nesselbush, now passed by the House and Senate, that will change upon the Governor’s signature.

In written testimony supporting the bill, the Rhode Island chapter of the Progressive Democrats of America (RIPDA) summarized how the bill makes a difference:

The bill improves the current law in several ways.  First, in redefining “employee,” the protected class is broadened to generally include “independent contractors” (minus the groups that have been specifically excluded).  Second, it provides for the State to suspend a non-compliant business’ license.  Third, it allows employees to recover double damages and attorneys’ fees from a wage-stealing employer.

Not only does this bill deter unscrupulous employers from stealing from employees with suspension of a business’ license, but, for those who are deprived of their rightful wages, the bill gives a real solution.  Instead of merely filing with the Department of Labor and Training, employees will be able to sue directly and recover twice as much as was stolen from them.  Attorneys are encouraged to take meritorious cases — if successful, the employee’s lawyer is entitled to be paid by the employer.

The most financially vulnerable among us are targets of wage theft.  The biggest challenge remains:  Employees need to be aware of their rights, and have the courage to seek legal help when standing up to unethical and manipulative bosses.

Violence at early morning wage theft demonstration


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
2015-10-31 Fuerza Laboral 002
photo courtesy of Fuerza Laboral

An early morning “trick-or-treat” themed anti-wage theft action at 23 Julian St. in Providence, the home of Juan Noboa, was met with violence Saturday morning as Noboa allegedly assaulted one of his former workers with a baseball bat. About two dozen demonstrators arrived at Noboa’s door at 5:30 am, wearing costumes and carrying signs, there to demand that Noboa pay his former employees the $3,691.35 the Rhode Island Department of Labor and Training deemed to be owed on June 30th, a small fraction of the $17,427.00 in unpaid wages that workers claim to be owed.

To date, Noboa and his partner, Jose Bren, have not paid, necessitating Saturday morning’s action. Instead of paying, Noboa came out swinging with a baseball bat.

According to Fuerza Laboral community organizer Phoebe Gardener,

In our early morning wage theft action today, former Café Atlantic restaurant owner Juan Noboa physically assaulted one of the worker leaders, Flor Salazar, with a bat, hitting her three times in the arm and shoulder but aiming for her head. Flor was there with two other workers who Juan Noboa and business partner Jose Bren owe over $17,000 in stolen wages to. Café Atlantic workers have been organizing for 10 months for their wages, including a previous action at Juan Noboa’s house back in January.

“On June 30th, the RI Department of Labor issued an official order for Juan Noboa and business partner Jose Bren to pay just below $4,000 (only a fraction of the money claimed in their original complaints) to 4 of the 6 workers who filed complaints. It’s been 4 months, and Noboa and Bren still haven’t paid. Workers had no other option then to use community pressure to force Noboa to pay, and Noboa responds by assaulting workers.”

Flor Salazar was taken to the hospital where she was released after determining that she had no broken bones but two or three contusions.

2015-10-31 Fuerza Laboral 003
photo courtesy of Fuerza Laboral

When Providence Police arrived just after 6:30am, Noboa answered the door, according to Providence in Espanol, “screaming about the protesters.  Noboa then tried to run, and the police chased him in his home, authorities said… After the altercation, an officer [was] transported by a rescue vehicle fire department at Rhode Island Hospital with a possible broken foot.”

This was the second time workers demonstrated outside the home of Juan Noboa over this issue. Back in January workers went to Noboa’s home, and days later Noboa, through his lawyer, denied owing any money.

In a statement prepared before the action and before she was assaulted, Flor Salazar, who worked between 60 and 70 hours a week at Café Atlantic between August 1st and September 28th of 2014, said, “The DLT decision requires Café Atlantic to pay just a percentage of the total wages we are due, but we thought that Noboa and Bren would at least pay up now with an official order from the state. Workers won’t come forward if they feel that the DLT doesn’t have the tools to actually recover their wages. This isn’t just about our wages. This is about bringing justice for working families and single mothers.”

Wage theft is endemic in the restaurant industry in Rhode Island, yet there is very little recourse available to workers wanting to collect stolen wages. If an employee steals from their employer, they can face arrest and serious legal consequences. If an employer steals from an employee, there is little chance that they will suffer any serious legal consequences.

2015-10-31 Fuerza Laboral 001
photo courtesy of Fuerza Laboral
2015-10-31 Fuerza Laboral 004
photo courtesy of Fuerza Laboral
2015-10-31 Fuerza Laboral 005
photo courtesy of Fuerza Laboral
2015-10-31 Fuerza Laboral 006
photo courtesy of Fuerza Laboral

Patreon

Report: Hiring older workers is good for business


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

50plusPeople know that race and gender play a role in keeping otherwise qualified people from getting a good job. But silver hair can also be a discriminating factor in the workplace. Ageism is rampant in America. And it’s also bad for business.

A new study from the AARP discredits widespread myths and misconceptions about age 50 and over employees, showing that they have skills and abilities that can make them key to operating a successful business.

“Just as today’s 50-plus population is disrupting aging and eroding negative stereotypes, today’s 50-plus workforce is adding value by exhibiting traits that are highly sought after in today’s economy,” said AARP CEO Jo Ann Jenkins in her statement on the releasing the 92 page report. “Leading employers across all industries value the expertise and experience of workers 50+ and know that recruiting, retaining and engaging them will improve their business results.”

The report, “A Business Case for Workers Age 50+: A Look at the Value of Experience 2015,” says that the argument for employing older employees has grown even stronger during the last decade, reinforcing a 2005 AARP study that found that these experienced workers are highly motivated, productive and even cost effective.

Researchers claim that this study documents for the “first time why attracting and retaining experienced age 50+ workers is critical for businesses seeking an advantage in the labor market.”

The AARP report comes at a time when experienced workers are playing an increasing role in America’s workplace, research shows. In 2002, workers age 50 and older made up only 24.6 percent of the workforce. By 2012, they were 32.3 percent. By 2022, they are projected to represent 35.4 percent of the nation’s total workforce.

The AARP new study addresses a widespread misconception that older workers cost “significantly more” than younger workers. In fact, adding more talented older employees to your workforce can result in only minimal labor cost increases, says the researchers, noting that 90 percent of large employers now base pay in part on job performance, rather than exclusively on length of employment.

In addition, in terms of retirement costs, only 22 percent of large companies now offer a defined benefit pension plan, down significantly from the 68 percent in 2004.

Looking at the 50-plus segment of the workforce from a performance standpoint, AARP and Aon Hewitt say that older workers remain the most engaged age group. The study reports that 65 percent of workers age 55 and oler are considered “engaged” while younger employee engagement averages 58 to 60 percent.

Although the generational differences in engagement might not seem large, “it takes only a five percent increase in engagement to achieve three percent incremental revenue growth,” the report finds. This can translate into a large company with $5 billion in revenue achieving a $150 million revenue increase as a result of even a five percent engagement improvement, the study says.

An engaged older workforce can influence and enhance organizational productivity and generate improved business outcomes,” says the report. Other advantages of older workers include their job experience, professionalism, strong work ethic, lower turnover, and knowledge.

Contributing to Rhode Island’s Economy

“We have noted in the past the relevance of Rhode Island’s so-called Longevity Economy,” said AARP Rhode Island State Director Kathleen Connell. “Despite being just 36 percent of Rhode Island’s population in 2013 (expected to grow to 38 percent by 2040), the total economic contribution of the state’s 50-plus population accounted for 46% of Rhode Island’s GDP ($24 billion). Now we see another reason to embrace the older population.

Connell notes the “report reinforces the value of older Rhode Islanders as they continue to be a key asset in the workforce. The truth is, that older workers increase labor costs minimally while contributing experience and stability to businesses across the spectrum.

“Many employers in Rhode Island understand this. AARP Rhode Island gets frequent calls from business actively seeking older workers. They know the value and the wisdom they bring to the workplace,” says Connell.

But Oak Hill resident Hank Rosenthal, 64, says of his two year job search, after being laid off, he experienced job discrimination. “Having been interviewed by numerous Human Resource professionals, they just seem incapable of understanding that the years of experience someone has gained is an asset. They seem unable to appreciate that knowledge, experience, and even skills acquired over a lifetime can be transferred and used in virtually any organization or business,” he says.

Rosenthal, now gainfully employed, views his older contemporaries as being “more stable, reliable, have better work ethics and generally make great employees, in line with the observations of the AARP report. With the difficulty in finding employment he believes that companies have not figured this out yet. “What a terrible waste of human capital,” he says.

According to Charles Fogarty, Director of the Division of Elderly Affairs (DEA), the recently released AARP study helps his agency spread this message, “older workers are expected to play a key role in sparking Rhode Island’s comeback.”

“We support policies and programs to help this crucial segment remain active in the labor force by connecting older workers to services and training,” says Fogarty, noting that AARP’s study confirms, “our seniors are a valuable asset in our workforce given their wealth of knowledge, ability to mentor younger colleagues, and commitment to hard work.”

While older workers may be forced to continuing working to pay their bills, many employees will take jobs for both psychological and social fulfillment. Hiring and retaining older workers may be a simple way for American businesses to maintain their competitiveness in a world economy. The report says that this can easily be accomplished by having “flexible workplaces, options for transitioning to retirement and fostering generational diversity and inclusion.” The AARP report is a must read for any CEO or Human Resource Director.

For the full report, go to http://www.aarp.org/research/topics/economics/info-2015/business-case-older-workers.html.

Herb Weiss, LRI ’12, is a Pawtucket-based writer who covers aging, health care and medical issues. He can be reached at hweissri@aol.com.

Raimondo supports a $10.10 minimum wage


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Gina Raimondo
Gina Raimondo

Governor Gina Raimondo announced her support of bills in the General Assembly that would raise the minimum wage in Rhode Island to $10.10 an hour at a press conference held at the United Food and Commercial Workers Local 328 on Silver Spring St. in Providence. The location was chosen because Raimondo’s grandfather helped found the union 77 years ago.

Raimondo pledged to support the bills introduced in the Rhode Island House by Representative David Bennett and in the Rhode Island Senate by Senator Erin Lynch.

“Nobody who works full time should have to live in poverty,” she said, even as she acknowledge that raising the wage to $10.10 won’t be enough. That’s why her budget, to be introduced on Thursday, will be “focused on creating more family-supporting jobs.”

ROC tee 2Activists from the Restaurant Opportunity Center (ROC United RI) were present at the press conference and encouraged by the Governor’s support, but “they are also arguing for an increase in the wage of tipped workers who have worked without an increase in base pay for more than two decades,” according to their literature.

In an apparent nod to their concerns, Raimondo has tasked the new head of the RI Department of Labor and Training, Scott Jensen, to head up an investigation into “tipped minimum wage enforcement” and review restaurant labor law compliance after the present legislative session ends.

Deborah Norman
Deborah Norman

RI AFL-CIO President George Nee said that “we have to keep the momentum going” on raising the minimum wage, citing the “tremendous problem with income inequality.”

Deborah Norman, owner of the restaurants Rue De L’Espoir and Rue Bis said that “as a business owner I support an increase in the minimum wage to at least $10.10. It would not hurt my business in any way,” a very different message from that presented by the Rhode Island Restaurant Hospitality Association at a recent House Labor Committee hearing held to discuss Representative Bennett’s bill.

Patreon

Restaurant workers and owners wrestle over tip theft


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Regunberg
Rep. Aaron Regunberg

House Bill 5363 which attempts to curb tip theft in the service industry and give employees additional power to combat the practice, was introduced by Representative Aaron Regunberg this year. It is identical to the one introduced the last two years by Rep Chris Blazejewski with the big difference being that public awareness of the pervasiveness of tip and wage theft is growing due to some serious studies released recently (along with the efforts of the Fight for $15 movement) and the addition of a new player here in Rhode Island as Mike Araujo takes the helm of a new local branch of the Restaurant Opportunity Center, ROC United RI.

“Tip theft is a practice in which employers or managers appropriate some of the money left as tips for restaurant, hotel or other service workers,” Regunberg explained.

It primarily occurs, he said, in four different ways:

wFpL_40I
ROC United RI

1. Employers can demand a cut of tips from workers
2. Employers can absorb automatic service fees who you might think would go to those workers that provided the service,
3. Employers can charge workers if customers use credit cards
4. Employers can include themselves in the tip pool and then take a cut of that pool.

“For me there’s a few different angles to this issue,” said Regunberg, “Besides being a workers protection issue, I really believe it’s fundamentally a consumers rights issue as well. If I am eating at a restaurant or staying at a hotel, and I leave a ten dollar tip, I assume the entire ten dollars is joined to the workers who did the work that I paid the tip for. I think that’s a reasonable assumption, one that’s shared by the vast majority of customers.”

Chris Tarro, owner of Siena Restaurant Group, sidestepped the issue as to whether or not customers are being duped when restaurants take part of a tip or the entirety of a service charge, saying, “Every employee in my facility knows, when they get hired, that I deduct the credit card fee on their gratuity only.”

Mike Araujo of ROC United RI, countered that, “To say that the credit card fee or the commission that’s paid is on the gratuity alone is kind of a misnomer. The fact is that a tip is a wage. It’s making up the difference in a wage that’s already too low, so anything that comes out of that wage is directly coming out of the pocket of that employee.”

Joey DeFrancesco, who became an Internet sensation with his video “Joey Quits” in 2011, explained one way in which the present process works against the employee actually providing the service.

“I worked at the Providence Renaissance Hotel… this is a pretty fancy place… I worked in room service and we made about $5.50 an hour, so below minimum wage. On top of that we got service charges in the hotel. Each bill going to room service got a 20 percent service charge. the customer sees that bill, assumes that’s a tip, and is not going to tip you. You’re not going to be impolite and say, ‘Actually, you know, we’re not getting that,’ you know, that’s against the rules.

“What was actually happening is the hotel was taking that 20 percent service charge and then our managers, supervisors who were making more than twice as much as us per hour, were taking half of that. So at the end of the day the servers actually conducting the work were making less than half of the tip money that customers believed they were giving to those servers.”

Joseph Fortune worked at Ruth’s Chris Steak House in downtown Providence during the entirety of it’s being open.

“If it was a booked banquet, I would still be making $2.89 an hour. The tip would look like a 20 percent tip going to the waitstaff, but really 17 percent went to the waitstaff and the other 3 percent was administrative for the managers. And pretty much, the customers never knew that… I would be fired if I told them, ‘Look, that 3 percent isn’t going to me.’”

Standing room only at the committee meeting
Standing room only at the committee meeting

The restaurant owners in attendance, mostly members of the Rhode Island Hospitality Association (RIHA), disagreed with the way the issue was being framed, and disagreed on the basic definition of certain terms, like service charge, gratuity and management. Kristin Gennuso, of Chez Pascal, explained why she thinks there’s a difference between a tip and a service charge.

“They are not considered to be the same thing by the IRS,” said Gennuso, “A tip is money that is left by a consumer. It is left free of will. A service charge is imposed, put on by the establishment. Sometimes you’ll see that for parties of six or more there will be a 20 percent gratuity, excuse me, service charge.”

“When you add a service charge to someone’s bill, you the consumer has to pay an 8 percent tax on that service charge. Then I take that service charge, I have to put that in as a sale… and then I can distribute it to my employees through payroll where the taxes can be taken out. So it’s consider a sale, that raises my sales liability, I have to put it into my payroll, which raises my payroll, and my worker’s compensation liability, and then I can distribute it out as I see fit because it’s an item on a check.”

“So, if it says a service charge, it’s not a tip. They’re two very different things.”

House Labor Committee vice-chair Rep Thomas Palangio pointed out that when a customer sees a service charge on a bill, they are going to assume that it’s for the server, to which Gennuso replied, “That’s a problem with the language, isn’t it?”

When Palangio pressed that people won’t tip as much, because they assume it’s taken care of in the service charge, Gennuso countered, “But it’s not the fault of the employer, however.”

Restaurant owners had other complaints as well. Chris Tarro explained that he has “140 employees, and I love my employees. I love ‘em. So when I hear the word ‘fraud,’ or ‘steal,’ or ‘take advantage,’ I get pissed off. I love my staff. When it snows and we have a bad day, I care more about them than about me. I’m getting choked up because I care about them, and I don’t know a restaurant owner that doesn’t.

“This is the industry I love, and this is one of the only thriving industries in the state, and we’re being attacked.

“This bill- I get the intent of this bill- we shouldn’t steal from our staff. I absolutely agree that this is a worthwhile goal but this bill isn’t the way to accomplish it.”

This prompted Jaimie, a restaurant worker in support of this bill, to counter, “If [Taro] really loves his employees and wants to protect them, there’s no reason there should be any opposition to this bill.”

“This legislation,” says Representative Regunberg, “is not punishing businesses. It doesn’t add an additional tax onto business owners. What it does is ensure that workers, many of whom are low wage workers relying on those tips, receive the gratuities that they worked for, and customers’ money goes where it was intended to go.”

But Chris Tarro thinks the bill does impose a cost, saying, “This bill avoids the Rhode Island Department of Labor and Training (DLT) and goes to Superior Court. We have a DLT to handle this, but the bill would move these cases to the much more costly superior court.” (Though unsurprisingly, I have never heard of a business owner who would willingly forgo Superior Court  in the case of an employee caught stealing from them.)

Bill Kitsilis, an attorney as well as the owner of Angelo’s Pizza Palace, complained that “what scares me about this bill is that it’s a pro-plaintiffs bill. There’s a lot of propaganda to say it’s protecting employees, it’s tip theft and wage theft, but what this is is an administrative nightmare for especially pizza restaurants, the counter service, coffee shops, you name it.”

“This bill says that you can only share the tips in proportion to the work done by the service employees. What does that mean? On a Friday night at Angelo’s Pizza I have two people working the counter up front, two cashiers in the back answering phones but they’re not doing the same exact work. There’s one tip jar up in the front and they all share it equally. We’ve been doing it this way for thirty years without a problem.”

“What happens here, when you have a law that brings you right to Superior Court, it absconds, because you don’t go to the Department of Labor anymore, and it makes you pay if you lose, even a little bit. Trying to defend what proportionality means and sharing of tips? Who a manager really is and who a manager isn’t?”

“Put this in the hands of a plaintiffs attorney where they get to go to court and they’re entitled to attorney’s fees and triple the damages if they just win a little bit? or put a gun to an owner’s head where you’re forced to settle. No offense to any attorneys on this board.”

This prompted Rep. Joe Shekarchi, the chairman, to distance himself from the legislation, laughing, “I can assure you that none of us drafted this bill.”

Dale Venturini and Mike Araujo
Dale Venturini and Mike Araujo

Bob Bacon, head of the Rhode Island Hospitality Association and owner of Gregg’s Restaurants argued that, “A state law on this would be redundant to the federal law. The federal law is very thorough. It’s very well enforced…”

Joey DeFrancisco disagreed with Bacon’s assessment. “I thought federal law would cover [the tip theft I experienced at the Renaissance Hotel Providence], so I went to the Department of Labor… and I said, ‘This is crazy that this is going on, can you guys investigate?’ This was in 2011. They did so, they looked into the issue, they interviewed managers and workers they got back to me and said, ‘Okay, in fact, they are stealing your tips, however because they are not stealing enough of your tips that it’s putting you below minimum wage, there’s actually nothing the federal Department of Labor can do about this.”

Remember that there are many different ways in which tips may be stolen by management. So sometimes, when the fines are big enough and the case is against a high profile target, the US Department of Labor does step in. “Mario Batali was fined $5 million” for wage theft, points out Chris Tarro.

“The federal laws are simply not sufficient,” concludes DeFrancisco. “They do not cover tip theft in the forms we’re talking about, which is why so many states… have passed bills like this.”

In fact, according to Regunberg, “Rhode Island is significantly behind the eight ball on this issue. By my count there’s at least 23 other states that have state legislation banning some or all forms of tip theft, including most of our neighbors. New Hampshire, New York, Maine, Massachusetts, Vermont, etc.”

“If you pass this bill and servers cost more,” warns Chris Taro, “the people that might get hurt are the people who are already the lowest paid in the industry. The cooks. The dishwashers. The cleaning guys.

“I want my servers to make more money,” continues Tarro, “This isn’t the bill to do it. Let’s work together promoting this industry. Let’s educate the people who are breaking the law and penalize them. Let’s get together and spend more money on tourism because our state is pitiful and behind. I do more business, they make more money. Simple as that.”

But to argue that laws meant to protect low wage workers hurts the restaurant industry ignores the fact, says Mike Araujo of ROC United RI, that, “the people who serve are part of the industry.”

He said, “The average tipped worker does not make $20 an hour. We are not all high end restaurants. We are mostly Denny’s, we are mostly diner service. So to say that ‘my people do well’ or ‘I love my people’ might be true, but we have to love all the people who work in the industry.”

Bob Bacon made a counter offer that would involve no intervention from government. “…as chairman of [RIHA] last year and as a member of the board the year before, and I’ll reiterate this year again, if one of these people that says they have all these problems, if they want to come to us, I’ve offered for three years in a row to do the following: First, we’ll keep the employees name confidential. Second, we’ll meet with the employer and we’ll bring the complaint to their attention, third, we’ll work to educate that employer on the U.S. Department of Labor’s rules and regulations on the matter, and fourth, probably most important, in the event that an employer chooses to stay out of compliance with an issue, we would assist the employee in going through the appropriate channels to get the situation rectified.”

It doesn’t seem to have occurred to Bacon that the idea of an employee, going to a consortium of power players in the restaurant and service industry here in Rhode Island to make a complaint with no guarantee of legal protection of the kind granted by the government, might be seen as career suicide. The idea that wage theft can be dealt with by the very industry committing the violations is absurd.

“…the majority of the people in this industry, they object to the people who may violate [laws against wage and tip theft],” says Bacon, “Thirty-five years plus in the industry, I’ve never encountered it, but I’m not naive enough to say that it doesn’t exist. I can tell you that it doesn’t exist on the level that’s being portrayed here tonight. I can say that without any reservation.”

Back in reality, Rep Regunberg said, “In order for us to have a productive dialog and come to a solution that optimal for all parties, we first have to take as valid that this is a real issue. This is a practice that happens, and I’m by no means implying that all employers engage in tip theft, but I can almost guarantee you that if you talk with nearly any service worker, they can clarify that this is something that takes place and not as an isolated incident. This is something that can occur regularly, that places a real burden on Rhode Islanders who are working hard and are relying on tips to make ends meet.”

Mike Araujo was more pointed. “The fact is that the people who work for tips in Rhode Island use public assistance at a rate twice that of any other employee. Of the 20,000 people who work for tips in Rhode Island we’re talking about 10,000 who are on assistance. Clearly, every penny counts to these people.

“The cost of public assistance, just in food assistance to tipped workers in Rhode Island, amounts to $700,000 per month,” continues Araujo, “It’s vital that this passes. This is an issue of poverty, this is an issue of equality, and this is the right thing to do.”

Patreon

Wage theft leaves victims few options other than protest


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

DSC_9811The recent protest outside Juan Noboa’s Olneyville residence by restaurant workers claiming that they were owed thousands of dollars in unpaid salaries for work at his Café Atlantic restaurant has provoked conversation about the propriety of such tactics. Noboa, though his lawyer, denies any wrongdoing and claims that one of his children was “terrified” by the crowd outside his house. His lawyer added that dissatisfied employees should not “protest at a man’s home in the dark” and suggested that a suitable location for protest might be the now closed restaurant.

It is true that no one would be disturbed by a protest at a closed restaurant. For Noboa and other business owners accused of misconduct by their employees, such an event would be perfect, because the media would not cover it, and no one would have to hear the protester’s demands. Those targeted by such protests and their defenders like to point out that there are proper channels through which to make such complaints. The protesters outside Noboa’s home, with the help of Fuerza Laboral, did file complaints with the Rhode Island Department of Labor and Training, so we can all rest assured, it is argued, that once the system has run its course, justice will be served and Noboa will be compelled to pay, or not, depending on the Dept. of Labor decision.

Yet protests like these are not about one business owner who may have stolen wages from employees, or even about two restaurants (the other being Gourmet Heaven, located in downtown Providence and formerly on the East Side) that have closed suddenly, leaving their employees high and dry. These protests are about what Phoebe Gardener, a Community Organizer for Fuerza Laboral, called, “…a pattern of Providence-based food establishments intentionally cheating workers of their wages.”

Statistics on wage theft are difficult to find. At the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) it is estimated that nationally, wage theft, “is costing workers more than $50 billion a year.” To put that into perspective, the EPI notes that “All of the robberies, burglaries, larcenies, and motor vehicle thefts in the nation cost their victims less than $14 billion in 2012, according to the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reports.” Wage theft is at least three times more costly than all other forms of theft combined, yet our prisons are filled with conventional thieves, not duplicitous employers.

Surveys indicate that most victims of wage theft never sue and never complain to the government. “A three-city study of workers in low-wage industries found that in any given week, two-thirds experienced at least one pay-related violation,” reports EPI, emphasis mine.

Wage theft is widespread, extremely profitable and easy to get away with.

Workers at the low end of the pay scale, or who are socially vulnerable, such as undocumented immigrants or former prisoners, are frequent victims. Reporting the crime of wage theft takes time, time the working poor need to be working in order to survive.

There is little reason for employers to properly pay what they owe workers. If caught, an employer will be ordered to pay the workers what they are determined to owe and may be fined a “maximum civil monetary penalty” of $1,100.

So let’s revisit the tactics of protest.

DSC_9779Having protesters arrive outside your home at 6am to accuse you of theft with a bullhorn is embarrassing and may be even a little frightening for your family. The very possibility that this might happen should serve as a deterrent to any business owner in Providence who might be considering cheating employees out of the money owed to them. As the Fuerza Laboral press release stated, “Workers and allies are bringing the message that they must be paid in full immediately or else they will continue to bring public attention on Noboa and the other owners.” [emphasis mine]

Workers, who used to be all but powerless in these situations, are finding ways to shift the playing field. This doesn’t mean that workers suddenly have the advantage, far from it, but if workers continue to use such tactics, business owners will no longer be able to steal from their employees so easily. Now offending employers risk something much more valuable than money: Their public reputations and the respect of their neighbors and family.

Laws could be passed that strengthen the rights of workers and make it easier to file claims of wage theft. Fines and penalties for non-payment or underpayment of wages could be increased to the point where they act as real deterrents, rather than as a cost of doing business. Our legislature could enact legislation that makes it economically worthwhile for unpaid employees to pursue their rightful claims.

However, in the absence of thoughtful legislation that protects the rights of workers, public protest must fill in to loudly proclaim a simple truth: Workers have dignity and deserve to be treated with respect.

Patreon

Juan Noboa denies wage theft allegations


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
DSC_9761
Café Atlantic employees outside Juan Noboa’s home

Juan Noboa, one of the owners of Café Atlantic accused of non-payment of wages by former employees, “denies that he hasn’t paid people proper wages,” said his lawyer Dawn Oliveri.

Further, Oliveri assured me that she knows Noboa as “a very respectable business man.”

She intends to fight the allegations made by Fuerza Laboral on behalf of workers who have claimed that Noboa owes thousands of dollars for work done at Café Atlantic, a restaurant Noboa opened in September of last year and then closed shortly after.

Oliveri questioned the tactic of protesting outside a man’s home in the early morning, telling me that Noboa claims that one of his children was awoken by the protesters and “terrified.” She added, “You don’t protest at a man’s home in the dark.”

Oliveri also questioned the using word “thief” by the protesters in describing their former employer. “I hope they can substantiate their case,” she warned.

Our short conversation revolved around tactics. In Oliveri’s opinion the proper place for the protesters to state their case was at the closed restaurant, located at 1366 Chalkstone Ave, where the alleged wage theft took place. She then added, “I have a lot of respect for civil disobedience and so does Juan.”

Complaints of non-payment of wages against Noboa and his partner, Jose Bren, have been filed by several employees with the Rhode Island Department of Labor and Training over the last few months. In one complaint, Edwin says he was hired to work in the kitchen and claims that he is owed $700.

“Juan said he would pay some of the beginning wages in cash but only paid part. [Noboa said] the checks were set up but he didn’t bring them on Friday and then another excuse. Tomorrow. Then for Sunday but no one showed up. That Monday Juan and Chino assured me that all would be there money wise on Wednesday nobody again then or that week until a meeting with Chino.”

Jared, hired to be a front line cook, says that he was paid for the first week but not thereafter. He claims to be owed $462.

Flor Salazar was hired as an administrative assistant and claims she is owed $7,332.50. According to the complaint she filed, payment of the money owed her, “was requested, but [Noboa] never replied in person, only by phone and he refused to answer. We asked for a meeting so we could come to an agreement and he refused.” [Spanish translation provided by Tony Houston]

A worker named Oscar says he is owed $7,803. He wrote in his complaint that when he tried to find out why he wasn’t getting paid, Noboa, “never gave a valid reason, he just disappeared and I couldn’t talk to him again after he closed [the restaurant] either by cell or text message but there was no answer.” Oscar adds that Noboa agreed that, “he would give [my payment] to me in time because he was just starting, but in the end he just decided to close and he said he would open in 3 days, and it never happened. I only ask that he pay me what he owes me.” [Spanish translation provided by Tony Houston]

In the end, the cases will be adjudicated by the Department of Labor, and official determinations will be made. I will follow up on this story as it develops.

Patreon