Bus monitors speak out about privatization efforts


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Bus Monitors 03Projecting a tight budget, Providence school officials are considering outsourcing the school bus monitors.

The Providence School Board and Superintendent Susan Lusi are “seeking bids on buses and drivers, and also asking for an additional price for monitors,” said PPSD Director of Communications Christina O’Reilly.

There are nearly 200 bus monitors in Providence, who earn an average of $12.37 per hour. When public education outsourcing occurs a private company often hires back some employees at a lower wage and other new employees at drastically lower wages.

“Seeking this pricing in no way obligates the School Department to have the transportation vendor provide the monitors, but provides us factual information regarding costs,” O’Reilly told me.

“The genesis of this issue precedes the incoming Elorza administration by nearly two years,” she told me. But Elorza transition team spokesperson Marisa O’Gara said “Mayor-elect Elorza supports Superintendent Lusi and the Providence School Board’s decision to seek additional information regarding the cost of bus monitors.”

Mayor-elect Elorza and Superintendent Lusi should realize that it is the total cost of privatization needs to be examined, not just the savings that may accrue in eliminating certain jobs and lowering pay.

In talking to bus monitors on Tuesday morning outside the First Student bus lot on Ricom Way in Providence, I learned that the duties and responsibilities of bus monitors are surprisingly complex. In addition to helping schoolchildren on and off the buses, and making sure that vehicles are complying with traffic laws and stopping when the students are in the street, bus monitors are trained in first aid, trained to deal with special needs students (and parents), are there to help evacuate a bus in the event of an emergency and stand ready to protect children from those who might come onto the bus looking to do students harm.

The bus monitors I talked to have been on the job from anywhere between three and 20 years. They know the children they care for. They know the communities they serve. Parents trust the bus system because they know that the bus monitors are professional and accountable.

Bus Monitors 01When I asked the small crowd of bus monitors how many of them lived in Providence, every hand went up. Many are single mothers and fathers. Make no mistake: being a bus monitor does not pay a lot, but it pays enough so that the men and women I talked to can maintain their homes, afford health care and send their children to school. Bus monitors take pride in their work. They know how important their jobs are. They are aware that they play a key role in the safety, security and wellbeing of our children.

The bus monitors spoke to me about their disappointment in Providence Mayor-elect Jorge Elorza, because they feel that they supported him when he was seeking to be elected, but now feel betrayed that he is looking into putting them all on the unemployment line, or to force them to do the same work they do now but for a private company at a fraction of their current pay. They wondered why cost cutting is always placed on the backs of the poorest citizens. They are appealing to the Elorza’s humanity.

Bus Monitors 02Spaight O’Reilly says that privatization is not yet a done deal. “Seeking this pricing in no way obligates the School Department to have the transportation vendor provide the monitors, but provides us factual information regarding costs.”

The cost of nearly 200 Providence families suddenly without jobs in this difficult economy, signing up for various forms of public assistance, should be balanced against the few dollars an hour savings in salaries. A cost also needs to be found for the extra danger our students will be in as responsible, trained professionals are replaced with minimum wage workers who may lack the experience, motivation and training required to properly prioritize the lives of our students.

Privatization of public services too often results in tiny and temporary savings at the cost irreplaceable expertise and the hollowing out of jobs in vulnerable communities. I hope Mayor Elorza is wise enough to see that destroying people’s livelihoods is not a good first step on the sustainable path towards a revitalized Providence.

Below, a bus monitor makes her case in Spanish.



Support Steve Ahlquist!




Eva Mancuso stifles debate, wonders why debate went elsewhere


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

mancusoSusan Lusi, the superintendent of the Providence school department, has come out against the NECAP graduation requirement, and Eva Marie Mancuso, the chair of the Board of Education, has accused her ofgrandstanding” by presenting her concerns to the legislature rather than to her board.

Ha ha. This is funny because over the past year, Mancuso has maneuvered the Board and its agenda to shut down any possibility of real discussion of state testing policy. If Susan Lusi has chosen to use a different forum to make her concerns known, Mancuso might be the only person in Rhode Island who wonders why.

As I’ve written in the past, I have completely failed to find a forum in this state even for simply presenting a technical critique of the use of NECAP tests to anyone in authority. What’s remarkable about this is that a technical critique is more than just a statement of opinion.  It’s an opinion about how the future will unfold. What I observe is a natural consequence of arithmetic, statistics, and the choices of the test designers. The results are impervious to the attention they get. Whether anyone listens to the critique or not is irrelevant to whether or not its effects will be felt. To date, I have not heard or seen a single response to my critique that did not rely on purposefully misconstruing it, and it has been endorsed by people who know a lot more about testing than I do.

If my critique is correct, then lots of kids will flunk the NECAP test, pretty much no matter what. I don’t have to be heard at a Board of Education meeting for this to come true. If my critique is correct, then RIDE is wasting a lot of money forcing school districts to undermine the test they have spent so much money designing and promoting.  I don’t have to be on the radio for this to come true. If my critique is correct, performance on the NECAP test will not be well correlated with performance in college or a job. I don’t have to be called by a reporter for a response to RIDE’s many misstatements for this to come true.

These are serious consequences, with dollar signs attached to them. Not to mention thousands of damaged lives. Unfortunately, they are no longer just future possibilities. At this point, six hundred Providence students, along with over a thousand of their peers around the state, are at risk of not graduating from high school. To some extent their school systems have failed those kids, and to a large extent RIDE has failed them.

Policy makers have a responsibility to consider the consequences of their actions. Simply ignoring the possibility of bad consequences — precisely what has happened — is utterly irresponsible. Eva Marie Mancuso and Education Commissioner Deborah Gist, by doing everything they can to shut down debate over their policy, have demonstrated that they simply do not care about the consequences of their decisions. They claim to care about the students for which they are responsible, but belie those empty claims with their actions.

The rumors I hear are that Mancuso yearns to be appointed to the bench. Just the sort of judge we want: the kind who refuses to hear evidence. Gist wears her career ambitions on her sleeve, and they obviously extend far beyond our little state. Presumably advances in test scores will help her career after her contract here expires, and get her a lucrative book deal about how she turned around a little state. What are the lives and futures of a couple thousand kids when weighed against that kind of success and fame?

It is indeed true that having high school graduates who cannot do math is bad for our state. Is it not also true that having education policy makers who do not care about math is equally bad for our state?

RI Progress Report: Property Taxes, Jason Pleau, URI Contracts, Gemma, the Mob and Occupy Providence


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Here’s a list of the 19 cities and towns that are considering raising taxes in next year’s budget, according to a great article by Dan McGowan, of GoLocal: Bristol, Charlestown, Cumberland, East Greenwich, Hopkinton, Jamestown, Little Compton, Middletown, Narragansett, New Shoreham, Newport, North Kingstown, North Smithfield, Portsmouth, Richmond, Smithfield, Tiverton, Westerly and Woonsocket.

He quotes conservative mayor Dan McKee of Cumberland as putting the blame squarely on the shoulders of former Gov. Don Carcieri: “The former Governor claimed he needed to cut funding to teach cities and towns a lesson,” McKee told McGowan. “His assumptions were not grounded in fact.”

At least if URI professors would have gotten their raises, tuition hikes would pay for something. With salaries now effectively frozen, tuition increases will pay only for the state to not fund state schools. It’s all part of a growing trend to make the University of Rhode Island into the University in Rhode Island.

Almost three months to the day, the Catholic church is closing a day shelter that Occupy Providence won in negotiations with the city in exchange for ending its encampment in Burnside Park. Occupy Providence agreed to leave the park if the city ran a day shelter for the homeless for at least three months.

The question now is whether Gov. Chafee will appeal the Jason Pleau decision to the US Supreme Court. He has 90 days to decide. In the meantime, “it is wrong for the federal government to impose on our state a policy that Rhode Island eliminated more than a century and a half ago,” said Steve Brown of the RI ACLU. “The ACLU and other groups opposed to the death penalty will continue to urge that the federal government drop any plans to proceed with a death penalty case against Pleau, who has already agreed to serve a sentence of life imprisonment without parole.”

Ted Nesi reports that Anthony Gemma will soon be holding a press conference to introduce new staffers … still no word on whether or not Gemma knows what a press conference is or how one is supposed to work.

Don’t tell the local media this, or our shared cultural understanding of this state, but the mafia in Rhode Island is no longer all that influential.

Meanwhile corporate America made a record $824 billion last year as pretty much the rest of the country floundered further into debt.

Congrats to Susan Lusi, the interim superintendent who was just named the permanent head of the Providence school system.