What anti-war activists should protest for: Eric Draitser explains the multi-polar world


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

draitserRecently I was talking with a colleague who said he wished that, when there is anti-war protest in Providence, the protesters would be able to offer something a bit more substantial that just slogans and pacific ideals. I agree with this sentiment

To that extent, I recently had the opportunity to speak with Eric Draitser. He is a geopolitical analyst and commentator whose work can be read in CounterPunch, RT television’s website, and a variety of other forums. He currently can be heard weekly delivering the podcast CounterPunch Radio.

Over the next several articles, Draitser will introduce through our conversation a series of concepts and strategies that are now gaining currency within the international geopolitical arena. The theory of a multi-polar world, for our purposes, envisions the end of a world order where the United States is the dominant power in the international political arena. In its place, various regional powers emerge and develop a set of consensus points that are used to dictate a level of peace and stability in the world. In this world-view, the Russian, Chinese, Indian, and Iranian leadership in their spheres of influence help balance out and reduce the occurrence of conflicts.

This is not a new concept and it is one that is quite familiar to figures such as Sen. Jack Reed, the Rhode Island congressional delegate who is considered a liberal despite sitting on a military appropriations committee where he has shoveled billions of dollars into the maw of the military-industrial complex while Rhode Island has above-average unemployment and astounding rates of childhood hunger, homelessness, and poverty. Sen. Reed knows that a multi-polar world would reduce the spending on the Pentagon budget and make some of the social safety net programs proposed by the Bernie Sanders presidential campaign not just tenable but conservative when one considers that over half of our total annual budget goes to fund war. Yet in the name of an antiquated and paranoid Cold War mindset wherein we must fear the Moscow-Peking alliance, America is a shambling, barely-conscious impersonation of the late Roman empire, over-extended and dependent on a semi-privatized contractor military the has wrought chaos, destruction, and death across much of the world while alienating those who would have us as allies.

I do not deny that some of these concepts are jarring at first. The power structure has engineered a clever campaign to make the efforts of our potential allies seem like “imperialism” and “aggression”. It is also vital to understand that these are not apologias for singular individuals or governments, states are always violent systems. It is also not a direct path to the Big Rock Candy Mountain of some wonderful socialist tomorrow. Yet in a world where America is a pariah and loathed by its neighbors due to imperial arrogance and where Jack Reed, Sheldon Whitehouse, and Hillary Clinton are not sending themselves or their loved ones to die in war, consider these ideas with maturity.

kaGh5_patreon_name_and_message

Scenes from a peace rally in Providence


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Several activists gathered today in Providence and marched to the State House in protest against war. Beginning at the statue of Ambrose Burnside, they exited the eastern gate of the park, walked down Exchange Terrace, and walked up past the Providence Place Mall to the State House, where they ended with some speechifying. The event was called for by Emily Daniels-Linback and her daughter and included people of all ages.

EDITORIAL NOTE: A previous version of this piece misidentified the individuals who called for the event.

2015-12-05 13.18.18 2015-12-05 13.27.04 2015-12-05 13.27.15 2015-12-05 13.27.31 2015-12-05 13.28.54 2015-12-05 13.29.00 2015-12-05 13.29.22 2015-12-05 13.29.29 2015-12-05 13.51.28 2015-12-05 13.52.06 2015-12-05 13.52.08 2015-12-05 13.52.10 2015-12-05 13.54.03 2015-12-05 13.54.37 2015-12-05 13.55.51 2015-12-05 13.55.52 2015-12-05 13.55.55 2015-12-05 13.55.57 2015-12-05 13.58.01 2015-12-05 13.59.39 2015-12-05 14.03.20 2015-12-05 14.03.26 2015-12-05 14.03.48 2015-12-05 14.05.43 2015-12-05 14.14.24 2015-12-05 14.16.07

kaGh5_patreon_name_and_message

Nap Quest


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

America with all its might
Protects our homeland from the fight
But rebels have a way to creep
Into our lives while we’re asleep

My bedroom used to be the place
Where I’d depart the human race
A pillow underneath my head
Anticipating dreams ahead

Sound sleep helps us rejuvenate
Revives us if we’re up too late
The eyes are how you always tell
When someone hasn’t slept too well

But that’s the way it used to be
Now sleep is just a memory
Of how life was before the sight
Of bodies on the news each night

Young children slaughtered in their school
A pilot doused with rocket fuel
Then set ablaze while people cheer
A blade cuts off a woman’s ear

We’re far away from all of it
Yet feel the pain from where we sit
Then try to shut it out in bed
But shut the horror in instead

Insomnia is on the rise
Dark circles under tired eyes
Like landmines on a Kabul road
Our minds are ready to explode
c2015pn

late-riser

RI delegation on Obama’s ISIS speech


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

obama isisWhile Rhode Islanders were still celebrating or commiserating their candidate’s primary performance earlier this week, President Barack Obama was addressing the nation about his plans to “destroy” ISIS without putting more troops on the ground.

Here’s his 15 minute speech:

Taking the nation’s temperature, The New York Times reports this headline: “Weary of War, but Favoring Airstrike Plan”. It could as easily apply to Rhode Island’s congressional delegation.

All four supported additional airstrikes and, for various reasons, agreed more troops on the ground would be counterproductive. Here are each of their full statements.

Senator Jack Reed (senior member of the Senate Armed Services Committee):

“Tonight, the President made a clear, compelling case that denying these terrorists safe havens will require a targeted, smart, and sustained multi-national effort.

“Like many Americans, I am skeptical of deeper military involvement that could lead to an open-ended conflict.  I don’t want to see more U.S. combat troops on the ground because I think that is what ISIL wants: to try to bog us down in a bloody and costly fight that helps them recruit more terrorists.  Indigenous forces on the ground are going to have to step up.

“This President’s deliberate and thoughtful strategy ensures we will not repeat the mistakes of rushing into ground combat as we did in Iraq in 2003.  Instead, he developed a comprehensive strategy that includes our allies in the region, together with the force of our diplomatic power, intelligence capabilities, and targeted military might.”

Congressman David Cicilline (A member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Cicilline received a national security briefing from Administration officials on Thursday, before issuing this statement):

“Last night, President Obama addressed the nation and outlined a comprehensive strategy to defeat the terrorist group known as the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant, including increased U.S. military action in the region and military and technical support for our allies. The President reaffirmed his position that our response will not include U.S. combat troops on the ground and the President made clear he has no plans to do so. I strongly support this position.

“It is clear that ISIL poses a serious threat to U.S. national security interests in the region and has expressly threatened the American homeland, and we must do everything we can to prevent another terrorist attack on American soil. We must also remain vigilant as a nation and ensure we’re fully equipped to respond to all threats against America or American personnel. The President laid out a thoughtful strategy to work with Iraqi and Kurdish forces on the ground, as well as a broader international coalition, to defeat this grave danger to U.S. national security interests and regional stability.”

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (Whitehouse visited Syria in January 2013):

“After a decade of war, I share the concerns of many Rhode Islanders about further military engagement, but I also share their alarm over the rising influence of ISIL and their horror over the brutal tactics used by these extremists.  I will continue to oppose the deployment of regular ground troops, but we must take seriously ISIL’s ruthless beheading of Americans, its threat to U.S. personnel and facilities in the region, and its ability to capture territory and resources to conduct terrorist attacks.  I believe the plan outlined by the President tonight – to build a coalition of regional partners and work with the newly formed Iraqi government to drive ISIL out of that country – is the right approach.  I also support expanding our efforts to provide military advice and airstrikes, and arming moderate rebels in Syria – a step I first called for after visiting the region early last year.  Syria and ISIL present a complex set of problems to which there are no easy answers, but I believe President Obama is pursuing the best set of options available to us at this time.

Congressman Jim Langevin (senior member of the House Armed Services Committee and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence):

“The threat posed by ISIS demands the world’s attention and action. They are the very definition of extremist, and their brutality knows no bounds. They have perpetrated unspeakable acts of violence against innocent people, including women, children and religious minorities who have been targeted for their refusal to adhere to an extreme and dangerous set of principles cloaked in religious sentiment.

“Intelligence officials estimate that thousands of Americans and Europeans have joined ISIS fighters, and these individuals could return home with the intent of doing harm to the United States and our allies.

“This terrorist threat, combined with existing sectarian tensions and an Iraqi government that, until now, has marginalized too many of its people, has created a complex challenge in the region, and it will take a multifaceted, collaborative effort to ultimately defeat ISIS. That approach must include a more inclusive government in Iraq, and I am encouraged by the improvements we are starting to see on that front.

“Like so many of my constituents, I do not want to see the United States embroiled in another ground war in the Middle East. We have learned over the past 13 years from our mistakes in Iraq. But on the eve of September 11, a date so deeply ingrained in the minds and hearts of Americans, we remember where we have been, and can see a clearer path forward. Evil cannot be left unchallenged. I applaud the President’s speech tonight as a first step towards addressing this threat, and I appreciate his commitment to working with Congress and keeping the American people informed. Going forward, I expect to hear further details of the timing and scope of the strategy he proposes, and I will continue to exercise rigorous oversight of the military commitment to come.

“The challenges we face are tremendous, but in the face of this adversity, the United States of America is ready to lead a broad coalition of partners in the region and worldwide to address the threat posed by ISIS. And as we face this threat, I continue to be so grateful to the brave men and women of our military. To the service members here and abroad, and to the troops that will join this effort to defeat ISIS, thank you for your tireless commitment to preserving freedom and protecting our country.”

Emergency Solidarity Rally in support of Israel


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

DSC_4007The Jewish Alliance of Greater Rhode Island held an “Emergency Solidarity Rally” on Wednesday night at the JCC on Elmgrove Avenue in Providence in support of the State of Israel during the present military crisis in Gaza.

The event was marked by prayers and songs from religious leaders as well as reports from Naomi Sommer, an Israeli teen staying Providence and Maor Mintz, who lives in a Kibbutz only a mile or so outside Gaza. Both spoke about the difficulties of living under the threat of rocket attacks and of the fear for their loved ones back home.

Opinions on the policies pursued by the State of Israel in Gaza were mixed. While virtually all of the four hundred people present felt that Israel has a right to defend itself and wished for a peaceful settlement to the current war, there were some disagreements among the attendees as to what exactly Israel’s course of action should be. As Marty Cooper, director of the Community Relations Council pointed out, in a room of 400 people there are probably 800 opinions about Israel in regard to the current crisis.

Rabbi Sarah Mack, president of the Board of Rabbis of Greater Rhode Island, prefaced her opening prayer for peace with the observation that, “We stand with Israel in all its shades of gray.”

Rabbi Michelle Dardashti explored some of the darker shades of gray when she read a poem that explored the suffering of first the Israeli and then the Gazan people. Dardashti told the crowd that, “It’s easier for us to hear the first part of [the poem] about our people suffering, and it’s very scary and hard for us to look at the images of the Gazans crying and bleeding and suffering. We do have a right and an obligation to defend ourselves, and we also have an obligation, I believe, to defend our hearts from hardening.”

In response, there were a very few cries of “No!” as some in the crowd refused the Rabbi’s call for compassion.

Still, as Rabbi Dardashti led those assembled in a prayer for peace, all but a very few stood in prayer with her. In the end, at this rally for solidarity, compassionate hearts prevailed.

Would that such hearts could prevail in the Middle East.

DSC_3935

DSC_3936

DSC_3939

DSC_3946

DSC_3951

DSC_3958

DSC_3960

DSC_3968

DSC_3971

DSC_3975

DSC_3990

DSC_3997

DSC_4017

The full video of the Emergency Solidarity Rally can be seen here:

Is the Democratic Peace Theory An Oxymoron?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Occasionally, you’ll see some politician (for example, former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair) make the assertion that no two democratic nations have ever gone to war. I know that I’m hardly one to criticize the former Prime Minister of the entire United Kingdom, but I’ll criticize democratic peace theory (DPT), nonetheless.

The problem with DPT is that it relies on shifting definitions of both “democracy” and “war”. For instance, if I point to the Peloponnesian War as an example of war between democratic states, people will invariably point out the limited franchise in the Greek state (18 year olds, male, property owners), and the existence of slavery as reasons not to classify even Athens as a true “democracy”.

You can see the problem here; the United States hasn’t even fit that definition since about the early 20th Century; the mid-20 Century if you suggest that the end of Jim Crow truly democratized/ended slavery the South (and there are more then enough facts to back you up there, though others might suggest that slavery continues to this day). So that tosses out wars like the American Revolution and the War of 1812 (fought between the democracies of America and the United Kingdom). It tosses out the American Civil War.

I could go on with examples, but this great list has been existence on the Internet since 1998. It includes the mathematical probability of two democracies fighting an international war between World War 2 and Y2K (19.8%). Basically, it’s highly unlikely that a democracy would fight an international war, because A) democracies are relatively rare in the world, and B) so are international wars. So it’s not a question of government type, it’s a question of probability.

To throw out one final example; the Hamas government in Palestine’s Gaza Strip has recently fought a series of conflicts with Israel. Both governments were democratically elected (Hamas came to power after an election prompted by American democracy-spreader George W. Bush). In contrast, the less-militant Fatah government in Palestine’s West Bank, which is technically not democratically elected (it lost to Hamas yet refused to give up power) has pursued a diplomatic solution in the United Nations. How do we make sense of democracy and dictatorship then?

The issue is that proponents of democracy use it as a sort of cure-all for issues around the world. The reality is it’s not. Democracy requires a lot of work to get right, and has had critics from almost the beginning (the aristocrat Plato’s Republic is an example of a definite non-democracy, his mentor Socrates being notably put to death by a democratic government).

It also puts a greater value on the citizens of democracies. “Oh democracies would never go to war with each other, but non-democracies, who cares?” As though the lives of the citizens of non-democracies are less important. I’ve also heard DPT reduced to this tricky statement: “no democracy will willing vote for what it believes to be an offensive war.”

The problem is when has there ever been a war that couldn’t be turned into a defensive war? I mean, even James K. Polk portrayed the Mexican-American War as a defensive war.

Democracy rocks, but it’s not free of imperfections. It’s not like it’s infallible. We see that every day, voters and politicians can make mistakes too. Perhaps we might remember these words from Winston Churchill: “Many forms of Government have been tried and will be tried in this world of sin and woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.”