Tom Sgouros’ new book explains problems, solutions to banking crisis


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

IMG_4772-001Coming soon to your winter reading list: Tom Sgouros’ second book.

His first book focused on conservative mythology about the Ocean State, and this time the RI Future contributor and well-respected progressive policy analyst sets his sites on a national level with a look into the banking industry. It’s called, ‘Checking The Banks: The Nuts and Bolts of the Banking System for the People Who Want to Fix It.”

He calls it “a primer on banking language and practices… a modest list of useful concepts, a discussion of how banks work, and how they fail, as well as some suggestions for new institutions that might help make change.”

Sgouros uses his talent for making complex subjects easier to understand

The growth of banks from small institutions to large has had profound effects on all of us, not the least because of the necessary change in strategies to manage banking risk. When a bank makes a loan, it takes a risk that the loan may not be repaid. Banking is fundamentally about managing that risk, and other risks associated with the enterprise. But there are many ways to manage a risk. One way is to get to know your borrowers, to assess their needs, perhaps even to help them repay the loan with the occasional extension or refinance. In the case of a business loan, a bank could sometimes ease risk through introducing the borrower to potential customers for his or her businesses. Another way to manage risk is simply to find someone else to assume it. One way manages risk by reducing it; the other simply foists it onto a sucker.

But he not only points out the problems the banking industry faces, he also offers solutions with chapters on regulations, starting a bank, government funding, public banks and credit unions, among other ideas.

Traditionally, starting a bank is something for rich investors to do, but there are plenty  of others out there who have the capaicty to have an impact on our financial system…

The book, published by Light Publications, a Providence company owned and operated by Mark Binder, will be available commercially in the near future.

Gist won’t share dissertation with legislative leaders


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

gist2Deborah Gist declined to share her dissertation with legislative leaders, after North Kingstown Senator Jim Sheehan, a teacher, asked her to do so in a letter last month.

Gist replied to Sheehan, saying, “I hope you will read my work with interest with the embargo is lifted in June 2014.”

She also said, in fact, her dissertation did not speak to policy issues in Rhode Island, as Sheehan suggested in his letter.

You can read Gist’s letter to Sen. Sheehan here. And his Nov. 13 letter is below:

It was with great interest that I read an article appearing on the RIFuture.org website, “Public can’t read Deborah Gist’s dissertation on RI.”  I am curious, first of all, about the accuracy of the article. Specifically, has your dissertation, “An Ocean State Voyage: A Leadership Case Study of Creating an Evaluation System with, and for, Teachers,” been “embargoed” until September, 2015? Second, if the report is accurate, I would be interested in knowing why this is the case.

Given the import of the ideas and concepts within your thesis on the current educational reforms in Rhode Island, I believe it would be highly beneficial for the members of the General Assembly, and specifically the members of the Senate Committee on Education and the House Committee on Health, Education and Welfare, to have access to this important work.

I believe informing the policymakers of our state about your vision for Rhode Island education is necessary and appropriate as the General Assembly moves toward another legislative session that will once again focus on the education of our populace. While you have annually presented an address to the legislature and have also testified many times at various committee hearings, I believe your thesis is another important piece of your vision that should be shared with the General Assembly.

I therefore request that you provide a copy of your thesis to the Senate and House leadership, who may then share that document with legislative members.

I eagerly await your response and thank you for your serious attention to this request.

Sincerely,

James C. Sheehan
Senator – District 36
Narragansett, North Kingstown

 

Give blood to support secular values


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

1455150_10202694027776040_1791727515_nGovernor Chafee’s recent decision to let the giant evergreen dominating the State House rotunda be officially called a “Christmas Tree” rather than a “Holiday Tree” as has been the tradition since at least the Carcieri administration, is unfortunate. Chafee has been a very good advocate of church-state separation, fighting the good fight even when there was a political cost to doing so. Now that he is leaving office, one would think Chafee has nothing to lose by sticking to his guns on the issue, but for whatever reason Chafee has conceded the argument to the DePetro’s, Costa’s and Tobin’s of Rhode Island…

However, the Humanists of Rhode Island have more important issues to concern themselves with.

We’re holding a Blood Drive.

For the entire month of December anyone can go to any Rhode Island Blood Center location or Blood Drive van and use the code 3481 to give blood in solidarity with the Humanists of Rhode Island and the secular values our state was founded upon.

Giving blood isn’t a showy display of religious belief, and chances are no one will notice or thank you for it, but I promise that doing so will save more lives than displaying large religious icons in the State House rotunda ever could.

Podcast: Smiley announces, Siedle accuses, Ahlquist educates, Sheldon highlights health care


Tuesday Dec 3, 2013
North Kingstown, RI – Good morning, Ocean State. This is Bob Plain, editor and publisher of the RI Future blog podcasting to you from The Hideaway on the banks of the Mattatuxet River behind the Shady Lea Mill in North Kingstown, Rhode Island.

waterfallIt’s Tuesday, December 3rd, the day Detroit will, or won’t, officially file for bankruptcy protection … and, in local news, Brett Smiley is formally announcing he’s running for mayor of the Capital City today. Check out the About page on his website and you’ll see there is little doubt he sees himself as the progressive in the crowded field for mayor…

Brett will be joining Mark Gray and I for our first roundtable podcast on Thursday afternoon … if you’d like to join us, or have a question for Brett, reach out on twitter and/or Facebook….

And speaking of being mayor and running for office, current Providence Mayor Angel Taveras is scheduled to join the URI Honors Colloquium tonight on great public schools tonight … more on this developing story later this morning. The URI Honors Colloquium has already hosted such education experts as Diane Ravitch and Henry Giroux, and us progressives are sure looking forward to hearing what Mayor Taveras adds to this ongoing debate….

UPDATE: According to the Honors Colloquium, Taveras’ appearance has been canceled for tonight. “the Mayor expresses his sincere apologies for not being able to attend,” said his communications director, David Ortiz. “He had a scheduling conflict.”

Pension detective Ted Siedle is petitioning the Securities and Exchange Commission to investigate pension fund investments overseen by General Treasurer Gina Raimondo. Siedle says that some investment agreements essentially allow hedge fund managers to “steal from the state” by hiding information from the public that they are expressively allowed to share with other investors.

Raimondo’s office responded by calling the accusation a political attack. Yes, it is true, the retirees whose savings Raimondo slashed definitely have a political interest in her not becoming governor … the more pointed question she should respond to: do some state investment agreements allow managers to share information with other investors while shielding it from the citizens of Rhode Island. Because all of Rhode Island may not want the person who negotiated that deal to be our next governor…

Seidle told the Providence Journal: “What I have done for Rhode Island is to draw attention to the other side of the balance sheet, the other side of the income statement, which is how much has been paid to Wall Street.”

Steve Ahlquist offers a good government reason why Rhode Island should NOT have a Constitutional Convention in 2015. In an RI Future post published this morning, he says “Con-Con” delegates are elected for the singular purpose of amending the state Constitution, and thus aren’t accountable to any future voters.

“This is the wrong way to effect change,” writes Ahlquist. “Right now, the General Assembly can be held accountable by voters: If you don’t like the way they are behaving, you can remove them from office by voting for their opponents in the next election. The Con-Con delegates, on the other hand, have no such accountability. Delegates, unconcerned with being re-elected, can suffer no penalty for failing voters. Delegate candidates could conceivably run as moderates and then work to effect radical changes once elected.”

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse held a summit on health care yesterday and said Rhode Island is proving to be a stellar example to the rest of the nation in how to deliver better and more efficient benefits to people in the 21st Century. Similarly, a new report says the Ocean State is poised to be a national leader in solar power … in other words, Little Rhody shines when it comes to health care and renewable energy sectors of the economy … that’s called being well-situated for the future. Go Rhody!

A 38-year-old truck driver was ordered to pay the Koch bros company $180,000 because he participated in an organized hack on the right-wingers site … Koch Industries is located in Wichita, Kansas and so was his trial. The website was down for 15 minutes and the company said it lost $5,000 as a result…

On this day in 1886, textile workers in Fall River fought for and won … a 10-hour work day.

And in 1910 … the International Workers of the World, also known as the Wobblies, organized their first loggers union … speaking of organized labor in the timber industry, if you’ve never read Ken Kesey’s classic “Sometimes A Great Notion,” it’s a fantastic parable on team work and the dangers of thinking you’re above it. This is one of my favorite and most disturbing movie scenes of all-time:

Publisher Andres Shifflin has died … he founded The New Press after being fired from a Random House-owned company for not making enough money. He published the leftists works of Noam Chomsky and Studs Terkeland said his firing was essentially corporate censorship.

And one-hit wonder reggae singer Junior Mervin died yesterday … he wrote “Police and Thieves,” about senseless street violence … it became a hit for punk band The Clash, and turns out it’s just as relevant the 21st century United States as it was to 20th century Jaimaca and London.

Say no to ‘Con-Con’ because delegates aren’t accountable


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

ri_constitutionIt’s not on the radar of the average Rhode Islander yet but in 2014, as voters decide upon a new governor, we will also be deciding on whether or not to hold a Constitutional Convention. Every ten years voters get to decide whether or not to hold the Con-Con, and the last two times the measure was placed on the ballot (1994 and 2004) it failed. This time many groups on the right and the left of the political spectrum are gearing up to push hard on this issue.

The push seems to be born out of frustration with the way the General Assembly works (or doesn’t). One recent example of the General Assembly being out of touch with the wishes of Rhode Island voters is the legislative body’s recent inaction on eliminating the master lever. At State House hearings no one testified in favor of keeping the master lever and public support for removal was robust, yet the General Assembly failed to act. A case can be made that some members of the General Assembly should be held accountable for this failure.

Some are suggesting that the Con-Con will be a place to address this failure. Elected convention delegates could decide to put the decision on eliminating the master lever directly to the voters. The goal of eliminating the master lever might be accomplished but what about the goal of holding the General Assembly accountable? The General Assembly might start to feel even more able to punt on certain issues, because the Con-Con is not the process by which legislators are held accountable

If a Con-Con is approved in the 2014 election, then Rhode Island voters will have a chance to go back to the polls in 2015 and elect delegates to represent their views. Being a delegate is a one-time position that will begin and end with the convention. The delegates will consider and advance several changes to the Rhode Island State Constitution which will then be voted on by the public in 2016.

This is the wrong way to effect change. Right now, the General Assembly can be held accountable by voters: If you don’t like the way they are behaving, you can remove them from office by voting for their opponents in the next election. The Con-Con delegates, on the other hand, have no such accountability. Delegates, unconcerned with being re-elected, can suffer no penalty for failing voters. Delegate candidates could conceivably run as moderates and then work to effect radical changes once elected.

The most powerful penalty we can assign our elected officials, being tossed out of office by voters in a fair election, does not apply to Con-Con delegates. The job of a Con-Con delegate is to alter, perhaps fundamentally, the Constitution. Under Citizens United, the Supreme Court decision that effectively ruled that dollars are the equivalent of speech, an unlimited amount of money could flood Rhode Island from out-of-state special interest groups. Think ALEC on steroids. Con-Con delegates will be barraged by special interests supplied with bottomless wealth, perhaps seriously damaging the process.

If it is worth millions to rewrite our laws, how much is rewriting the Constitution going to be worth?

Civil rights could be severely impacted by a Con-Con. There is nothing to stop the delegates from putting measures on the ballot that might reverse the recent, hard-won marriage equality law, for instance. Polarizing issues are especially vulnerable: guns, reproductive justice, immigration, environmental and economic issues are all primed to be hijacked by special interests. Even if voters ultimately vote against the worst ideas the Con-Con advances, it will come at the staggering costs advertising for such elections has reached in recent years. Rhode Island will become a political battleground on a plethora of issues, and citizens will be barraged by advertising and advocates run ragged fighting for and against the proposed changes to the Constitution.

Our state legislature is based on the ideals of representational democracy. Our General Assembly, despite its many problems is the way in which we as citizens engage with important policy issues. The Con-Con is an attempt to perform an end run around the process, and like any high risk play, the end result may be amazing, but it will most likely end in a disaster of wasted money and effort.