Taveras calls for People’s Pledge in governor’s race


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Gina Raimondo and Angel Taveras supporting payday loan reform. (Bob Plain 5/18/12 Click on image for larger version)
Gina Raimondo and Angel Taveras supporting payday loan reform. (Bob Plain 5/18/12 Click on image for larger version)

In an effort to keep out of state interests from buying up the governor’s race, Providence Mayor Angel Taveras is asking Democrats to sign a People’s Pledge the disavows SuperPAC donations and other anonymous contributions.

“We shouldn’t allow outside special interests – whether it is deep-pocketed contributors or Wall Street entities – to spend freely through Super PACs or other Independent Expenditures,” Taveras said in a prepared statement. “We can’t allow Wall Street or special interests to use Super PACs as a backdoor to buy their own Rhode Island government. These are often shadowy groups who aren’t subject to public scrutiny. Voters deserve free and fair elections with the greatest transparency as possible.”

His campaign has been working on the pledge for several months, and it is based on two Massachusetts campaigns that took similar pleges: Congressman Ed Markey and Senator Elizabeth Warren. “I think Elizabeth Warren set a terrific example for Democrats by calling for an end to outside spending in campaigns,” Taveras said in a statement.

The idea of using a People’s Pledge in Rhode Island’s 2014 Democratic primary for governor was floated by Sam Howard in this post in September. In it, he writes:

Maybe we’ll be served well by a bruising Democratic primary…

…Or maybe reason and sense will come to our would-be leaders. And instead of behaving like two Cold War commanders; locked in Mutually Assured Destruction, each attempting to win with a devastating first strike; they’ll have a moment of sanity, as they so often have appealed to us to find within ourselves.

Then they might set aside whatever distaste for one another they might have, and meet, and take a People’s Pledge. And they could tell us that unaccountable money has no place in the Rhode Island of today, and should that vile spending find its way into our small state the benefactor will donate a sum to charity.

WPRI broke the story earlier this morning with this great lede: “He hasn’t formally declared his intention to run for governor, but Providence Mayor Angel Taveras is already trying to set the rules for the race.”

“It is one thing to opt out of the voluntary public financing system,” Taveras said in the press release. “It is another thing to allow Super PAC activity on one’s behalf after so many good Democrats worked hard for campaign finance reform in Rhode Island. Super PACs and Independent Expenditures are extraordinarily unpopular with Rhode Islanders and citizens across the country who are concerned about unchecked outside money in campaigns. As Democrats, we should hold ourselves to a higher standard,”

Here’s the pledge:

Rhode Island People’s Pledge

Because outside third-party organizations – including but not limited to individuals, corporations, 527 organizations, 501(c:) organizations, SuperPACs, national and state party committees – may air and continue to air and/or direct mail Independent Expenditure advertisements and issue advertisements either supporting or attacking (individually the “Candidate” and collectively the “Candidates”); and

Because these groups function as Independent Expenditure organizations that are outside the direct control of any of the Candidates; and

Because similar agreements have been proven to work in statewide campaigns in Massachusetts; and because the candidates agree that they do not approve of such Independent Expenditure advertisements and/or direct mail and want those advertisements and/or direct mail to immediately cease and desist for the 2014 gubernatorial election cycle; and

Because the candidates recognize that in order to provide the citizens of Rhode Island with an election free of third-party Independent Expenditure advertisements and/or direct mail, they must be willing to include an enforcement mechanism that runs not to the third party organizations but instead to the candidates’ own campaigns:

The candidates on behalf of their respective campaigns hereby agree to the following:

1. In the event that a third-party organization airs any Independent Expenditure broadcast including radio, cable, satellite, online advertising and/or direct mail in support of a named, referenced (funded by title) or otherwise identified candidate, that candidate’s campaign shall, within three (3) days of discovery of the advertisement buy’s cost, duration, and source, pay 50% of the cost of that advertising buy to a charity of the opposing candidate’s choice.

2. In the event that a third-party organization airs any Independent Expenditure broadcast including radio, cable or satellite advertising, online advertising and/or direct mail in opposition to a named, referenced (including by title) or otherwise identified candidate, the opposing candidate’s campaign shall, within three (3) days of discovery of the advertisement’s buy’s cost, duration, and source, pay 50% of the cost of that advertising buy to a charity of the opposed candidate’s choice.

3. In the event that a third-party organization airs any broadcast including radio, cable, or satellite online advertising and/or direct mail that promotes or supports a named, referenced (including by title) or otherwise identified candidate, that candidate’s campaign shall, within three (3) days of discovery of the advertisement buy’s cost, duration, and source, pay 50% of the cost of that advertising buy to a charity of the opposing candidate’s choice.

4. In the event that a third-party organization airs any broadcast including radio, cable or satellite, online advertising and/or direct mail that attacks or opposes a named, referenced (including by title) or otherwise identified candidate, the opposing candidate’s campaign shall, within three (3) days of discovery of the advertisement buy’s cost, duration, and source, pay 50% of the cost of that advertising buy to a charity of the opposed candidate’s choice.

5. The candidates and their campaigns agree that neither they nor anyone acting on their behalf shall coordinate with any third party on any paid advertising and/or direct mail for the duration of the 2014 gubernatorial election cycle. In the event that either candidate or their campaign or anyone acting on their behalf coordinates any paid advertisement and/or direct mail with a third-party organization that candidate’s campaign shall pay 50% of the cost of the advertisement buy and/or direct mail cost to a charity of the opposing Candidate’s choice.

Penalties for Breach

In the event that the undersigned candidate fails to make the charitable donation within the three-day time requirement, then the charitable donation shall double the required amount for an additional five (5) days after which if the charitable contribution is not made, then the charitable donation shall increase an additional amount representing an increase of 50% to the immediately preceding required charitable amount.

The candidates and their campaigns agree to continue to work together to limit the influence of third-party advertisements and to close any loopholes (including coverage of sham ads) that arise in this agreement during the course of the campaign.

 

David Segal, Maggie Gyllenhaal say stop watching us


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

What do David Segal, John Conyers, Maggie Gyllenhaal, Oliver Stone, John Cusack and Phil Donahue have in common? They are all members of the new group named after what it wants the US government to do: Stop Watching Us.

“We need to end mass suspicion-less surveillance,” Gyllenhaal says in the video.

On Saturday, the 12th anniversary of the infamous Patriot Act, the group is holding a march from in Washington D.C. According to their website: “Right now the NSA is spying on everyone’s personal communications, and it’s operating without any meaningful oversight. Since the Snowden leaks started, more than 569,000 people from all walks of life have signed the StopWatching.us petition telling the U.S. Congress that we want it to the NSA accountable and to reform the laws that got us here.”

The group is calling upon Congress to:

  1. Enact reform this Congress to Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act, the state secrets privilege, and the FISA Amendments Act to make clear that blanket surveillance of the Internet activity and phone records of any person residing in the U.S. is prohibited by law and that violations can be reviewed in adversarial proceedings before a public court;
  2. Create a special committee to investigate, report, and reveal to the public the extent of this domestic spying.
  3. This committee should create specific recommendations for legal and regulatory reform to end unconstitutional surveillance;
  4. Hold accountable those public officials who are found to be responsible for this unconstitutional surveillance.

“The public’s going to stay focused on this issue until meaningful reforms are implemented, and we’re hoping the Rhode Island delegation will stand with us.  In the immediate, that’d mean supporting the legislation that Patrick Leahy and Jim Sensenbrenner are putting forth, and working to undermine bills that will be pushed by the Intel Committees that only entrench the status quo or even make things worse,” Segal said, whose group Demand Progress is one of the champions of this cause.

segal stop watching us

Divest pension funds from guns, but don’t stop there


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

gina linc pensionDivesting from dangerous weapons is a step in the right direction, and I applaud Gina Raimondo’s effort to make our pension fund more socially responsible. This blog doesn’t often have opportunity to agree with the hedge fund-loving general treasurer, but I certainly hope the State Investment Commission takes her advice and takes our money out of a company that distributes guns.

I’d also encourage Raimondo and the others who control Rhode Island’s $7 billion nest egg to look hard for other opportunities to be more socially responsible with our money. This would be a pension reform progressives would be proud to support, and would be better for our economy than cutting COLAs or enriching hedge fund managers.

Divestment, or socially responsible investing, is already a movement in Rhode Island. The Providence City Council recently voted to make its investment portfolio better match its values (what that will look like still remains to be seen) and Brown Divest Coal has long advocated for the Ivy League endowment to take its money out of companies that harm the environment.

Here’s hoping Seth Magaziner’s political ambitions will help shine a bright light on why socially responsible investing is a better bet for Main Street. High finance can be community-minded. And the more it is, the more profitable being community-minded will become.

Hotel, hospital workers unite!


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Members of Local 217 gather outside the Renaissance Hotel for an Informational Picket.
Members of Local 217 gather outside the Renaissance Hotel for an Informational Picket.

The working class stands up to management tonight in Providence as two groups of employees – one unionized, the other not yet – will protest outside their places of employment.

Hospital employees and SEIU members will be calling attention to job cuts at Women and Infants today at 4:15. “Despite budget surpluses, senior managers Care New England are attempting to cut corners and compromise patient safety by laying off housekeeping, lab, and clinical staff,” said Patrick Quinn of the SEIU.

“Management’s plan to cut staff will mean hospital rooms are cleaned less frequently and increase the risk of infections which compromises patient safety,” said Sukie Ream a labor delivery room nurse. “Layoffs to clinical and lab staff could delay delivery of lab results which is not fair to patients.”

And in downtown Providence, Renaissance Hotel workers will march there at 5 pm to call attention to the federal health and safety violations the hotel was recently fined $8,000 for According to a press release, “The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) recently cited the Renaissance for serious violations, finding, amongst other violations, that “’employees’ hands, arms and faces were routinely exposed to corrosive and irritating chemicals.’”

Hotel housekeeper Santo Brito said, “Management has claimed that there is no safety problem, but the Federal investigation showed differently. Hotel management allowed these dangerous conditions to exist because workers have no voice at the Hotel. I am proud the workers stood up to stop this. The hazardous use of chemicals in the hotel caused us workers all kinds of physical suffering, from bad rashes all over our arms to frequent sickness.”

Capitalism is Bust; What’s next?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Seeding a Post-Capitalist Future: Discussion/video evening at the Voluntown Peace Trust. Friday, October 25, 2013: Potluck at 6:30 p.m. Program begins at 7:30 p.m. Voluntown Peace Trust

Hey 99%, how does it feel to be a disposable commodity?

A little over two decades ago Francis Fukuyama, political scientist and political economist, astonishingly argued in The End of History that in Western liberal democracy humanity might have found the “end-point of mankind’s ideological evolution.” Chris Hedges, a prophet of doom rather than hubris, in his The Death of the Liberal class expressed the view that: “Unfettered capitalism is a revolutionary force that consumes greater and greater numbers of human lives until it finally consumes itself.”

Fukuyama may have distanced himself from what he advocated in the nineties, but he drew a telling caricature of mainstream Western thinking. Even as deregulated capitalism riotously generates Hedges’s nightmares of social despair and destruction of the biosphere —as described in Days of Destruction, Days of Revolt— many of us have been so indoctrinated that we can no longer conceive of an alternative to our “free market” system of  entitlements for the rich.

Almost one hundred years ago Bertrand Russell wrote in Political Ideals:

Political and social institutions are to be judged by the good or harm that they do to individuals. Do they encourage creativeness rather than possessiveness? Do they embody or promote a spirit of reverence between human beings? Do they preserve self-respect?

Can anyone disagree with these values and doubt that we dramatically fail in their realization? After all, we spend about 60% of the discretionary budget on so-called national defense. Combine that with a prison system that disproportionately affects people of color and has  incarceration rate  that exceeds by an order of magnitude, the rates one finds in Europe, Canada, Australia and Japan, and it becomes difficult to disagree with Vijay Prashad when he states: “Prisons and war are the rational extensions of the system in which we live.”

Out-of-control war spending and incarceration are just a few “minor” symptoms of capitalism on its final descent into self-destruction. The mass extinction that might be caused by global warming  has the potential to produce death on a scale hundred  or thousand times as large. Will this happen and when? Nobody knows, but clearly the tipping point for run-away climate change is dangerously close.

<em>Seeding a Post-Capitalist Future:</em>  Discussion/video evening at the Voluntown Peace Trust. Friday, October 25, 2013: Potluck at 6:30 p.m. Program begins at 7:30 p.m. <a href="http://www.voluntownpeacetrust.org" target="_blank">Voluntown Peace Trust</a>
Seeding a Post-Capitalist Future: Discussion/video evening at the Voluntown Peace Trust. Friday, October 25, 2013: Potluck at 6:30 p.m.
Program begins at 7:30 p.m.
Voluntown Peace Trust

What are the alternatives?

This Friday the Land Stewards of the Voluntown Peace Trust will sponsor a discussion and video evening Seeding a Post-Capitalist Future. Although you would not read this in the corporate media —is there still anyone left who is reading them?— many of us agree, once again using Russell’s words, that

Capitalism and the wage system must be abolished; they are twin monsters which are eating up the life of the world.

We recognize what John Buck talks about:

I am supposed to be living in a democracy,” I said, “but I spend
much of my life at work in a basically feudal structure. There is a
Duke of Operations, an Earl of Administration, a Baroness of
Personnel, and so on. […] the only vote I have is with my feet
walking out the door.”

See We the People: Consenting to a Deeper Democracy by John Buck and Sharon Villines.

Few know that right now

  • 25% of the American electric system is co-op or municipal, essentially socialized.
  • Land trusts do development locally: profits accrue to the the public or non-profit.
  • California and Alabama use pension funds to finance in-state investments worker-owned companies.

Contrast this last item with Rhode Island’s use of pension funds to underwrite entitlements for Wall Street hedge fund managers.

To sum up, here is a list of topics for the discussion on Friday:

  • worker cooperatives
  • dynamic self-governance aka sociocracy
  • urban agriculture
  • prison abolition and racism
  • climate change (or catastrophy)

See you this Friday and please bring your friends and neighbors!

Interview: Gayle Goldin on voter ID, economic sustainability


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Freshman Sen. Gayle Goldin (Democrat, District 3 – Providence) won national praise for Rhode Island this session when she helped shepherd through legislation that expanded the state’s Temporary Disability Insurance to cover workers who need to take time to care for a new addition to the family or a seriously ill relative. Recently, she was kind enough to sit down with RI Future for a wide-ranging interview. The following transcript has been lightly edited for written media.

Gayle.Resized2RI Future: When you ran for office, your letter says you have a “commitment to the economic sustainability of families.” What does “economic sustainability” look like for you?

Gayle Goldin: For me it’s that everybody earns a living wage, that we recognize that working families are critical to keeping our economy going, and so those are things that are important to me, like paid family leave, like raising the minimum wage, insuring that we have full access to healthcare. All those thing that we have that I think help families be able to meet their own family needs and live in a society where our economy can flourish because of it.

RIF: Given your background with immigration, what do you think of the state’s current immigration policy, and are you happy with this?

GG: Immigration policy is primarily federal law, so I don’t know that there’s anything really going on on the state level at this moment. Is there something in particular that you were thinking about?

RIF: Well, allowing undocumented immigrants to get in-state rates in schools, and some people believe that if you’ve arrived here without documents you shouldn’t be allowed to access any kind of services.

GG: As I tell people, my parents moved to the United States when I was 7-and-a-half; they did so legally and I was in the country legally; but certainly as a 7-and-a-half-year old, I had absolutely no control over where I was moving or whether or not that was legal. I think it is really short-sighted if we do not ensure that people who moved here as children don’t have access to things like higher education merely because of a decision their parents made that they have no control over.

RIF: So you’re coming up on your second year of office, what do you think your biggest priority is going to be?

GG: I introduced legislation to repeal Voter ID, which while I had a very successful year my first term I was not successful in moving Voter ID. So I’ll be focusing on that again, and certainly I feel the 2014 deadline both because the law will roll into full effect in the election, and the election cycle itself will hopefully put the emphasis in getting that piece of legislation addressed, in some way. So that’s a real priority for me. There’s a variety of other things I’ve been researching and exploring about different functions within the state government that I would like to improve. I serve on the Health committee, and one of the things we oversee is DCYF [the Department of Children, Youth & Families]. I have been involved in child welfare policy and adoption rights for many years, so just trying to see if there are any gaps in DCYF that can be addressed through legislation or statutory change are some of the things that I’m looking at. And there are other pieces that are still in the research point,  but I absolutely do want to go back to repealing Voter ID. Also, I think the health exchange will probably be something that the General Assembly will continue to have conversations about as it gets rolled out.

RIF: If you could make one piece of legislation happen on Day 1 of 2014, what would it be?

GG: That’s a good question… I really do think it would be addressing our Voter ID law. I feel that is critically important to the way we view people’s rights on voting and our access to voting, so I’d really like to make sure that gets done… Nothing really gets done in a day in the General Assembly. [Laughs]

Read Part 1 of this interview here. Part 3 will be published tomorrow.