Paiva Weed: Senate will focus on poverty this year


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

paiva weedSenate President Teresa Paiva Weed said her chamber will focus on addressing poverty as a bottom-up strategy to fixing what ails Rhode Island’s economy this year.

“The Senate’s focus this session on the economy will be inextricably intertwined with the causes of poverty,” she said at a State House vigil yesterday to call attention to poverty in Rhode Island.  “We can’t move the economy forward without addressing the very issues that underline poverty.”

She said the vigil and a screening later in the day of Inequality For All “will set a tone for the year and the message will be carried with us as we work to meet the significant challenges ahead.”

Steve Ahlquist has the video:

RI’s real problem with jobs


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

WeldersRecently on Twitter, Editor in Chief Bob Plain welcomed mayoral candidate Brett Smiley to the RI Future family, touting Brett’s inaugural post on gun issues. But old Righty had to chime in to say, through a series of logical connections, that the real solution to gun violence is lowering business taxes and eliminating business regulations. Because of our “poor business climate”, Righty argues, nobody will move a business to Rhode Island and create the desperately needed jobs.

In this essay, I’ll go step-by-step through Righty’s thinking, point out where I think he goes astray and wrap up with some good, old-fashioned, Frymaster-style socialism. This essay will not delve into the particulars of gun control, but will focus instead on the causes of poverty and possible solutions.

Long story short: Righty’s solution is, in fact, the problem.

Guns, Gangs and Jobs

Righty’s first logical arguments seem pretty solid. It’s not the guns so much as the criminal gangs. This may or may not be fully accurate. Gun crimes require both a gun and criminal intent, so the absence of either would reduce the problem.

Next, Righty says that gangs and criminal activity result from poverty. I’m no crime wonk, but I think there’s fairly good evidence that violent crime, among many things, correlates with poverty.

Poverty, Righty contends, results from the lack of jobs, and the lack of jobs results from the poor business climate as measured by business taxes and the degree of business regulations. While not explicitly stated, Righty seems to indicate that changing these aspects of the RI economic structure would entice businesses to relocate here, creating jobs.

Of this last set of connections, only the first has any merit whatsoever. And with each successive step beyond what reality can support, Righty demonstrates how this kind of tired, 20th century thinking has created the problems with which RI struggles.

A Lack of Jobs? Not Really.

It is truly misleading to say that Rhode Island has a lack of jobs. Your Frymaster finds himself, um…, between engagements at the moment, and I can personally testify to the fact that there are many, many jobs in this area for people like me. If you have a college degree and European heritage, it’s not a question of finding a job but of choosing one.

From 1999 to 2009, RI posted the 18th highest rate of high income job growth in the nation and the highest rate in all of New England, second only to New Jersey in the northeast. (It’s a statistical tie at 58.9%.)

There’s just no truth to the idea that there aren’t jobs … for people like me. But it is true that there are no jobs for the kinds of youth that end up in gangs committing gun crimes. In all fairness to Righty, his basic point is well taken. If people in marginalized communities had greater access to decent employment, they’d be less likely to become involved with criminal gangs.

But this is the last piece of solid logic we’ll get from old Righty. From here on out, it’s typical conservative mumbo-jumbo that defines the problem, not the solution.

Capitalist Myths

The greatest and most dangerous myth at work here is the idea that the solution to our supposed lack of jobs is to lure companies from other areas to Rhode Island. These are usually short-distance moves that don’t actually change the regional economic situation. Nor do they address any of the cluster of factors that make blue collar jobs harder to find than white collar jobs.

As a positive example, UNFI came from nearby eastern Connecticut. While these workers now pay RI income taxes and some may have moved in-state, nothing about this move changes the underlying economic conditions. The multiplier effect is essentially nil.

38 Studios moved from nearby Massachusetts. Had it all gone to plan and the Baltimore group moved up after the launch of the MMORPG, this would have had some benefit to the regional situation. But, of course, it didn’t go to plan in any way. The enormous debt RI now faces is the disastrous downside of “buffalo hunting” as this practice is known in economic development circles.

Another debilitating myth that Righty suffers under is that taxes, unions and regulations are what killed the manufacturing sector in RI, the northeast and the US in general. Capitalism and no other force is what killed manufacturing. One of the great underlying tenets of capitalism is that continuous growth ensures ever expanding opportunity for workers. But this only applies until labor becomes scarce and wages start to rise.

Instead of mitigating growth and reverting toward the kind of stable-state, mom-and-pop business approach that once made the USA the envy of the world, capitalism insisted on ever growing profits. To that end, capitalists moved factories to wherever they could find cheap labor, leaving economic ruin behind. The great irony is that today, with a large and growing under-class of potential low-wage workers in cities across the US, other factors now present a cost-barrier to these kinds of ventures.

In particular, energy and transportation cost have exploded over the past decade. Thanks to the Reagan administration and the onset of radical capitalism in the 1980s, the US is woefully behind the curve when it comes to dealing with changes in the energy landscape. We’ve compounded this for ourselves by simultaneously pretending that global warming does not exist, so we didn’t need to plan for the extreme weather events that climate science predicted long ago. We now find ourselves continuously rebuilding one place or another that has been ravaged by a global warming-related event. Growth in healthcare costs that the private markets was supposed to limit or even reverse back in the 1990s have instead accelerated to take an ever-larger chunk of available income.

In the face of these brutal economic realities, it’s tragically laughable to assert that tax rates and regulations of the sort that prevent factories from poisoning their workers and host communities are somehow the problem. The truth is that we live in a very expensive place that cannot support the manufacture of cheap goods.

Poverty in RI

Righty would likely suggest at this point that there must be something about Rhode Island’s approach to business that accounts for the large disparity between our unemployment statistics and those of Massachusetts. Of course there must be, but the reasons are not what Righty thinks they are.

The difference, in a word, is education. Massachusetts has historically excelled in public and private education to the point that this is their defining characteristic; education is the Massachusetts brand. MA has higher educational attainment at all levels compared to Rhode Island, so their economy requires fewer low wage, low education jobs to achieve full employment. Nearly 16% of RI’s population did not attain a high school diploma, compared with 11% in MA. Thus we need roughly 50% more blue-collar jobs in our mix than MA does.

Jobs that most consider classically blue collar, like the welders in the image above, have become far more technical than they were. In fact, RI imports welders on a daily basis, likely because the state has few training programs. Training in the technical trades in general grew unpopular over the past few decades, and the result is that a state with one of the highest unemployment rates in the nation imports blue collar workers from neighboring states.

As a result of the low levels of educational attainment and lack of appropriate jobs, RI also suffers from the cluster of self-reinforcing impacts that result from poverty. It is difficult for people who have never lived or worked in the poorest communities to understand that poverty is a trap that is exceedingly difficult to escape from.

At the most basic, physical levels, poor communities are usually the most toxic and have the least green space. This creates higher levels of health problems, like asthma and lead poisoning. Many poor communities are food deserts and lack easy access to other key commodities. In a bizarre expression of supply and demand, some communities rely on the ubiquitous liquor store as the local, one-stop shop.

But above all else, poverty creates a stress that those who have never experienced it cannot imagine. Unlike Righty’s cartoonish view of the poor laying about watching soap operas, being poor requires constant action simply to feed oneself. Poor families move from one place to another far more frequently than those better off, creating significant problems for children in school. And these children constantly receive implicit and even explicit messages from their schools that they will not be able to achieve success.

Thus it is the mental health impacts of this level of insecurity are the biggest problems in escaping poverty. Poverty begets poverty because it is almost impossible to break out of the cycle. For all the talk about opportunity – from both the left and the right – there really is very little for the poorest communities. In the US in general and in RI in particular, this is our enduring shame.

Prosperity, not Wealth

Most economic development groups strive to “create wealth” in the ways that Righty seems to want to do. By convincing a capitalist that your community is the one in which he can generate the most wealth in the shortest time, you also create some number of jobs that may or may not pay enough to support the workers and their families.

This is the problem, not the solution. Unsurprisingly, people who’s primary motivation is to enrich themselves are not the most trustworthy. These deals are always “pay me now, get jobs later.” If you want to see your buffalo hunt go badly, just try inserting a clawback provision in which the job creators has to repay subsidies if they can’t produce the jobs. These are people who are always willing to turn on you should someone make them a better offer.

And yet Rhode Island remains mired in this kind of thinking to the point that Righty feels fully confident in spouting this lame, discredited malarky.

To the degree he has been able, Governor Chafee has focused economic development on the real drivers of prosperity: education, health and infrastructure. But what little he has been able to accomplish is far short of the interventions we need to heal the fractured economy.

If Rhode Island did just one thing to improve its economy, it should be to adopt the mission of Burlington, VT’s CEDO – the Community Economic Development Office. This mission essentially forbids buffalo hunting, instead requiring the organization to target resources on existing businesses and new enterprises started by local residents. It also seeks to create as many impacts as possible, meaning that any given allocation of resources will be small. The idea is not to create wealth for the few but to create prosperity for the many.

The results speak for themselves. Burlington is perennially awash in cash, running an annual surplus. They boast among the lowest unemployment rates in the country in the same range as the remote, resource-extraction driven economies like North Dakota. But Burlington is not focused on resource extraction. Instead, they enjoy a mix of large and small businesses in sectors like tourism, biotech and fulfillment.

And, as a final nail in the coffin of Righty’s take on economic development, buffalos come to Burlington, no begging, no tax breaks. Burlington is a thriving city that can afford excellent schools and excellent infrastructure. If you can take the harsh Vermont winters, Burlington offers a quality of life that few other communities in the northeast can rival.

Heal the Ecology, Heal the Economy

To move forward in a meaningful way, Rhode Island needs to get past the false dichotomy that environmental initiatives come at the cost of jobs. In fact, the opposite is true. The most pressing environmental needs all require large, blue-collar workforces. By attacking these problems head-on, we can drive prosperity at all levels of the economy.

At the top of our list must be consistent, sustained action on energy creation and usage. From distributed rooftop solar to utility-scale offshore wind farms, Rhode Island needs to move aggressively to reduce the need for fossil fuel fired electrical plants. Righty, you’re dreaming if you think that oil will ever cost less than it does now. Likewise, when the environmental impacts of fracking finally come to light, this cost will also skyrocket. Cheap natural gas is a beautiful illusion.

On the consumption side, the New England housing stock is woefully old and inefficient. The house in which I write has ill-fitting storm windows over old-fashioned, single-pane double hung sashes. We’ve had cellulose blown in the walls and the attic, but it’s far from a tight ship. And in the basement…you guessed it: an oil-burning furnace. There are probably tens of thousands of homes in the region that need a retrofit. It will probably take a decade to complete this work.

Next on the list is land management and use, which means urban trees and urban farms. Surging natural resources into the toxic, food-deprived inner city neighborhoods attacks poverty on a number of fronts. By increasing green space and decreasing pavement, we reduce toxic storm water runoff, improve air quality, decrease radiant heat, increase availability of high-value foods and increase community engagement.

These things are happening in Providence, but they can increase at least double. And they are virtually unheard-of in Pawtucket, Central Falls and Woonsocket, where they are most needed.

I would very much like to hear the Democratic gubernatorial candidates speak strongly to these ideas, but I doubt I will. Ms. Raimondo talks a good game, but she clearly labors under the capitalist myths. I would hope that Mayor Taveras could see the value here, but political reality will demand that he not challenge the voters outside the city limits with ideas that are strange and new. At least to them.

Let me sum up by saying that this: the fact that these proven approaches seem radical in Rhode Island circa 2013 is the single greatest problem we have.

Little Rhody, you are behind the curve and badly so. You need radical ideas and radical interventions. Financial literacy is meaningless to people living hand-to-mouth. Quibbling over a one-cent bridge toll is just silly when we need to radically restructure transportation funding across the board.

Still Righty beefs about taxes and spouts discredited myths. The problem, Rhode Island, is that you listen.

RI has not moved needle on poverty, uninsured


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

new england poverty rateRhode Island hasn’t moved the needle for people living in poverty, according to an analysis of new Census data by the Economic Progress Institute.

The Ocean State still has the second highest poverty rate in New England, behind only Maine, with 13.7 percent of residents living below the poverty standard. There are nearly 140,000 Rhode Islanders who earn less than $19,090 in 2012 and more than 62,000 Rhode Islanders earned less than $10,000.

Neighbors Connecticut and Massachusetts boast considerably lower poverty rates at 10.7 and 11.9 percents respectively.

“Stagnant income and unchanged poverty rates underscore the need for Rhode Island to do more to improve the economic vitality of our state and its residents, especially our African American and Latino neighbors,” said Kate Brewster, executive director of the Economic Progress Institute.

One third of Rhode Island Latinos were living in poverty in 2012 as were more than one-fourth of African Americans. Less than 10 percent of White Rhode Islanders were impoverished.

Rhode Island should make educating its current and future workforce the cornerstone of its economic development strategy,”  Brewster said.

Affordable housing, childcare assistance, support for the food bank and payday loan reform are also needed to reverse this trend, Brewster said.

Similarly, the number of uninsured Rhode Islanders remained stagnant with some 125,000 residents without health coverage in 2012. The Ocean State has the highest rate of uninsured residents in new England. Massachusetts has the lowest rate of uninsured residents in the nation at 4.3 percent and Connecticut has the fourth lowest at 9.4 percent.

 

 

This is what the good old days looked like

xmas1936
Photograph by Russell Lee, for the Farm Security Administration.

The picture to the right is called “Christmas dinner in home of Earl Pauley near Smithfield, Iowa…” This is Christmas for a farm family in Iowa in 1936. This is the world that conservatives call the ‘good old days’.

This is the sort of country conservatives believe we should have. Again.*

This was the age before Social Security, before Medicare, before welfare, before government regulation. This is a farm family. They worked hard–so hard that you and I probably cannot begin to conceive of how hard they worked. I’ve done farmwork, but it was mechanized, and it was still damn hard. So this family worked hard. There was no unemployment insurance. These were not urban welfare queens. They had not made bad choices, unless trying to run a farm should be considered a bad choice. They were not coasting, using the safety net as a hammock, because there was no safety net.

I assume the family in the picture is living on its farm. A lot of families lost their homes in the period 1929-1936 because they couldn’t pay the mortgage. Farmers in particular lost their land because their crops died in the field–if they grew in the first place–because of a stretch of drought that lasted several years, and that led to the Dust Bowl. My grandmother lived through the Dust Bowl in Kansas. Her stories were horrific.

You need to look at this and remember that this is the world that conservative politicians want to bring back. They want to kill all the social programs that were created as a result of the Great Depression. Conservatives want people who lose their jobs, through no fault of their own, to be pushed down to the sort of life that you see in this picture. They want people without work to fall into the sort of poverty that you see here. They may not realize what would happen if we follow their policies and gut social programs and all assistance to anyone but the wealthy. They may not realize what the implications of their policies will be, but the picture gives you a graphic example of the world that conservatives want to re-create.

Oh no! they proclaim. Getting rid of all this government will release the job creators, and they will create jobs! For everyone!

Bull.

The job creators at the time of this photo were fully unleashed. They were barely regulated. They were lightly taxed. And yet the people in this picture were living the way you see. Dirt floor. Bare plank walls. Where was the magic of the market? It didn’t solve the problems then. It didn’t help the people you see here. Rather, the people you see got to the condition you see because of the lack of regulation, and the lack of government support, and the low tax burden on those at the top of the economic pyramid.

The unfettered might of the market did nothing to help the people you see here. In fact, those with money shrieked that these people had to be left on their own, to starve if necessary. Any attempt to interfere would destroy prosperity. In fact, any interference by the government was immoral. But even a casual glance at this picture will tell you that any prosperity this family had ever known had been destroyed some time ago, and all because of the magic of the market. The only thing immoral was the sanctimonious attitudes of the upper echelons who let families live like you see in the picture.

If you read Friedman’s Monetary History of the United States, you will see that he talks about a seemingly endless series of economic crises, starting in the 1870s and carrying through to the Great Depression. That’s a period of 50-60 years, and there were three acute recessions and at least one depression (depending on how you define the downturn that began in 1873), and the last depression was so bad we call it Great. This averages to almost one crisis every fourteen years; the ‘teens of the Twentieth Century were marked by the Great War, so it’s difficult to compare this to ordinary periods.

One crisis per generation.

This is what the magic of the market created. A downturn every 14 years on average. Just about every generation was hit by a very nasty downturn, all in a period when there was no one to help. Private charity? Private charity is only viable during a period of economic expansion; when unemployment is above 10%, there simply aren’t enough people with enough money to make private charity effective. That’s why you have a family going through an experience like the one in the picture. Because people of the time relied on private charity.

And these were crises without unemployment assistance, food stamps, housing subsidies, with no government assistance whatsoever. People caught without work for six months or a year or three years had nothing to rely on, but they still couldn’t get jobs. Talk to people who lived through the Depression, quickly, while they’re still alive. They will all tell you, there was no work to be had.

And, btw, Friedman’s thesis that the Great Depression could have been avoided has been shot full of holes by our current situation. Friedman claimed that the Fed could have solved the problem through looser monetary policy. Since 2008/9, the Fed has been doing just that, pumping huge amounts of money into the economy in any way possible. And the same conservatives who howled about FDR have been howling about Bernanke. Has the policy worked? Well, we didn’t have a depression, at least not one like our grandparents lived through, but ask a recent college grad how easy it is to find a job. Look at the unemployment rate. So Friedman was a quarter-right at best. Monetary policy alone cannot solve the economic problems we faced in the early 1930s, nor the problems that we are experiencing in the early 2010s

Nor can the magic of the market create prosperity for all, except for relatively short periods. If capitalism produced a crisis every 14 years, that means if you were fortunate enough to graduate into an economic expansion, you should expect a downturn by the time you hit 40. Then maybe you’ll benefit from the upturn by the time you hit 50. Of course, by then you will have lost five or ten of your prime wage-earning years. So how are you supposed to save for retirement?

So look really hard at this picture. Think of it the next time you hear someone claim that we need to unshackle the job creators. Think of it and remember that the Titans of Industry screwed it up in the 1920s, and the 1900s, and the 1890s, and the 1870s…that’s a lousy track record. The Titans of Industry created the world you see in the picture.

*This is an incredibly harsh statement. I do not ascribe malign motives to sincere conservatives. I am not saying conservatives are evil people who wish misery on others. However, ideas have consequences; we have a moral obligation to understand the ramifications of our policies and of what we advocate for society. In this, I believe, the conservatives fail. Perhaps this is because they do not understand history; but a point is reached where there must be willful ignorance of what they advocate. History is so very, very clear, if you realize that there was history before WWII, or even before 1970. I keep coming back to this, but it continues to be true: we tried it their way. It did not work. Most of human history has been a long, dreary experiment in laissez-faire markets. The outcomes were horrible; look at this picture.

And if free markets or government regulation or interference or high taxes didn’t cause the situation in this picture, what did? They have no real answer for that question.

So yes, I realize I am making a terribly provocative statement; but the point stands. If we follow their advice, this is where we will end up. Again.

Fighting truancy with poverty


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
State House Dome from North Main Street

State House Dome from North Main StreetRep. Stephen Casey of Woonsocket has figured out a new way to punish the poor in Rhode Island.

He’s backing a bill that would kick parents off of government assistance programs if their children don’t have good attendance records at school. The bill only applies to welfare recipients, and not parents who receive tax breaks from the state. In other words, it targets poverty and exempts affluence.

Such legislation is becoming more commonplace in the General Assembly as class politics increases here in the Ocean State. Last year Rep. Doreen Costa introduced a bill that required social service recipients to be drug tested before receiving benefits but did not put similar conditions on those who get tax breaks from the state.

Advocates say the idea is to incentive better behavior. I think this line of reasoning ranges from being flawed logic to disingenuous debate. If poverty increases the likelihood of truancy or drug use, which it does, increasing poverty won’t decrease truancy or drug use.  If this worked, fire fighters would carry flame throwers instead of water hoses! Casey, a Woonsocket fire fighter, should know you don’t fight fire with fire.

Whatever the stated purpose of such legislation is, they function best at stigmatizing government assistance to the poor.

Truancy is an issue in Rhode Island. But divesting from the families of those who aren’t showing up for class won’t increase attendance. It will, on the other hand, make being poor a little bit more onerous on both the poor and by extension the rest of the economy as well.

David Cicilline and the anti-poverty agenda


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

I seem to remember a time when people actually cared about poverty, when poverty was something that society actually wanted to alleviate, when poverty was the social ill and not poor people.  That unfortunately was a long time ago.

Almost 15% of Rhode Islanders live in poverty, close to 155,000 of our mothers and fathers, our sisters and brothers, our daughters and sons.  According to the 2013 RI Kids Count Factbook, “[t]here are 39,900 poor children in Rhode Island, 17.9% of all children.”  One out of ten RI seniors lives in poverty.  In a civilized society that is supposed to take care of the less fortunate among us, this should be totally unacceptable.  In today’s America, this is just another day in paradise

There is a lot of discussion about the “middle class,” and about how to “strengthen” it.  But there is generally little discussion about poverty, its causes, consequences, and solutions (yes… solutions).  When there is discussion about the plight of the poor, it is generally to blame them, either indirectly or directly, for their circumstances.  This is not only offensive to the many, many folks who live their lives every day struggling to make ends meet, it completely ignores the economic realities facing the country and the social bases that perpetuate inequality and inter-generational poverty.

A Google News search for “poverty” yields 149,000 results.  The same search for “deficit” brings back over 1.2 million results.  I’m not sure why this is the case, but I feel the lack of discussion about poverty in the public realm perpetuates the problem, making poverty less visible and therefore “ignorable.”  The closest thing to a full public debate on poverty in recent years was John Edward’s campaign theme of “Two Americas” leading up to the 2004 and 2008 presidential elections.  And while that was particularly striking to me given the state of electoral politics, it was no Lyndon Johnson’s “War on Poverty” ad.

To this point, I am glad that Dem Whip Steny Hoyer recently announced the Task Force on Poverty and Opportunity, if for no other reason than to bring additional attention to a persistent and growing problem.  Equally, I am glad that Rep. David Cicilline has been appointed to it as he is one of the most vocal in Congress about poverty and has been working on his plan for two years to further boost American manufacturing.

These manufacturing jobs would be in sharp contrast to the low-wage work, particularly part-time work, that has been the norm during America’s economic malaise that many people call a “recovery.”  When almost 60% of the total number of jobs created after the recession officially ended is low wage occupations, should we even call it a recovery?  Moreover, the recession’s effects on employment highlight the need for non-employment based programs to reduce poverty.  Focusing only on programs to enhance the income of those who are working, while important, does nothing to help those who are unemployed.  And the longer folks lack a job, the harder it is for them to find another.

Empirical research shows that the loss of a good job during a severe downturn—the job-loss pattern of this downturn—leads to a 20 percent earnings loss lasting 15 to 20 years.  Earnings losses are more severe for long-term unemployed workers who run a greater risk of dropping out of the labor force and falling into poverty.

It’s important to understand that the policies and programs focused on reducing poverty actually work…, you know, when they’re allowed to work.  There are things that can (and should) be done to alleviate poverty in this country, especially in times like these.  When the economy was destroyed by those who have everything but wanted more, forcing misery and destitution on millions of Americans through no fault of their own, the most important thing to do is help ensure people can improve their lives.

I hope this task force will help find more creative solutions to reducing poverty, showing the same sense of seriousness and urgency that prompted Lyndon Johnson to push the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 through Congress.  They could start by raising the minimum wage, increasing the EITC benefit, prosecuting wage theft, making it easier to join a union, and truly helping the unemployed with job training, entrepreneurship assistance, long-term unemployment benefits, stimulus spending, and even subsidized work.  Maybe then we’ll see another significant decline in poverty as was seen throughout the 1960s.

Payday Loans, Poverty on Tap Today at State House


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
The State House in November.

Payday loan reform legislation has one of the  most interesting coalitions at the State House; it includes the progressive community, the faith community and General Treasurer Gina Raimondo. This is because payday loans are bad for the state in general, poor people in particular and a net drain on our economy.

Today on Smith Hill, legislators will hear from the faith community on why predatory payday loans should be controlled as well as why legislators should do more to protect the most vulnerable residents of Rhode Island.

The vigil starts at 2:30 and the group will walk from from Gloria Dei Lutheran Church to the State House, where Rev. Don Anderson and Linda Watkins as well as Lt. Gov. Elizabeth Roberts will make speeches.

ProJo columnist Ed Fitzpatrick made a great point about this event in Saturday’s paper. He noted that Gov. Chafee and Bishop Tobin both had ample time over the busy holiday season to debate what monicker we give to an ornament at the State House and wonders if either will have time to show up for this interfaith vigil meant to focus lawmakers attention on poverty.

“Surely, if they feel so strongly about a symbol of the season, they can appreciate the symbolic power of uniting against poverty in a state with the nation’s second-highest unemployment rate (10.4 percent),” he wrote. “I mean, if they’re determined to take a principled stand, how about taking a stand against poverty on the very spot where that controversial tree stood?”

Here’s hoping they can both make it.

RI Progress Report: Why Do Businesses Move to RI


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Happy Easter! Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, who has become one of the hottest politicians in the country as Congress begins to debate income inequality and corporate control, was on Newsmakers this morning.

Forget about why people leave Rhode Island for a moment and consider why they come here. The Providence Journal reports this morning that even though government still tries to lure new businesses to the Ocean State by lowering taxes and offering financial incentives, these are rarely the reasons that new commerce comes here.

Some really great writing here:

While Rhode Island promotes its tax-rate reductions as an inducement to move here, business owners say such incentives are not uppermost in their minds. Their reasons for choosing a location are complex and multifaceted. Factors include proximity to customers and pools of skilled workers, the existence of good schools and efficient transportation networks, and perceptions about a region’s business climate and quality of life, as well as state and municipal taxes.

Contrast that with decades ago, when the manufacturers who dominated the U.S. economy built factories at the intersection of cheap transportation and cheap labor. Cheap power was a bonus.  That was good for Rhode Island back when water wheels powered factories, when supplies and finished goods came and went by sailing ships, or when an immigration boom made labor cheap.

Cities and states offer tax breaks, loans, free land, job-training grants and all types of financial incentives to woo corporate leaders. They proffer economic rankings they believe reflect kindly on their state –– and poorly on competitive locales. But too often, the efforts of government leaders are wedded to what business owners needed in the past, and not what drives business decisions now.

 

Trayvon Martin certainly wasn’t the first African American in Sanford, Florida to run into trouble because of his race. So did Jackie Robinson.

“It was 1946 and Robinson arrived in this picturesque town in central Florida for spring training with a Brooklyn Dodgers farm team,” reports Reuters. “He didn’t stay long. Robinson was forced to leave Sanford twice, according to Chris Lamb, a professor at the College of Charleston in South Carolina, who wrote a graphic account of Robinson’s brush with 100 angry locals in a 2004 book.”

Was education consultant Stephen Hernandez, recently hired by Providence for $5 million, responsible for the improvements in Palm Beach County school system? Politifact says he wasn’t.

Another reason for the increase in income inequality and decrease in socio-economic mobility is the Clinton-era repeal of welfare protection laws. But fear not, the New York Times reports that many who would have received government benefits are now turning to the free market:

Several women said the loss of aid had left them more dependent on troubled boyfriends. One woman said she sold her child’s Social Security number so a relative could collect a tax credit worth $3,000.

“I tried to sell blood, but they told me I was anemic,” she said.

Several women acknowledged that they had resorted to shoplifting, including one who took orders for brand-name clothes and sold them for half-price. Asked how she got cash, one woman said flatly, “We rob wetbacks” — illegal immigrants, who tend to carry cash and avoid the police. At least nine times, she said, she has flirted with men and led them toward her home, where accomplices robbed them.

“I felt bad afterwards,” she said. But she added, “There were times when we didn’t have nothing to eat.”

 

Commodification of Suffering: An Ethics of Charity


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Drink to managed poverty

While shopping at Whole Foods last week (yeah, I do that often #smirking) I came across a new Whole Foods brand coffee. It was arranged in a pyramid styled display, and the store rep., having just completed the task of assembling it, stood nearby staring on with a look so proud it bordered on the supercilious.

I stepped closer to observe that the coffee was being shipped in from all around the world: Latin America, East Africa, India blends. Of course this is nothing new, we always bring in goods from places we’ve either colonized or helped facilitated the colonization of (think Vietnam). But what struck me most was what I read on the side of the container: “A hand up to over a million people. 30¢ from every can goes to alleviating poverty worldwide where Whole Foods Market sources products.”

Hmmm… “A hand up,” “alleviating poverty worldwide.” Really?

There are two immediate ways in which I might problematize the crisis in Western altruistic thought — and the capitalist work of Whole Foods in this endeavor:

First, it positions us, as Westerners who live in and with a “First World” perception, to imagine that essential poverty can be alleviated by 30¢. And what a bargain that is! In fact, it’s a 2 for 1 special, because not only can one purchase a can of fresh, organic, fairly traded coffee, but one can also purchase one’s redemption from having to think or be concerned about the constructed impoverished conditions of the people who laboriously tend this coffee on land they don’t own, or even control. One need not expend cognitive energy contemplating the worker’s labor conditions, which are likely politically influenced by social and economic mandates from one’s own First World government; just 30¢ and it all goes away.

Pardon me a moment while I run to my bookshelf, grab my bible and reread the parable of the Good Samaritan:
[Luke 10: 30-37]

29But he, willing to justify himself, said unto Jesus, And who is my neighbour?
30And Jesus answering said, A certain man went down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell among thieves, which stripped him of his raiment, and wounded him, and departed, leaving him half dead.
31And by chance there came down a certain priest that way: and when he saw him, he passed by on the other side.
32And likewise a Levite, when he was at the place, came and looked on him, and passed by on the other side.
33But a certain Samaritan, as he journeyed, came where he was: and when he saw him, he had compassion on him,
34And went to him, and bound up his wounds, pouring in oil and wine, and set him on his own beast, and brought him to an inn, and took care of him.
35And on the morrow when he departed, he took out two pence, and gave them to the host, and said unto him, Take care of him; and whatsoever thou spendest more, when I come again, I will repay thee.
36Which now of these three, thinkest thou, was neighbour unto him that fell among the thieves?
37And he said, He that shewed mercy on him. Then said Jesus unto him, Go, and do thou likewise. [KJV]

 

The marketing formation of this coffee creates a way for western consumers to escape critiques of capitalism. Rather than fundamentally question this economic monolith, we choose, instead, to tolerate it; and Whole Foods makes it a benign affair. In many ways that which we call “neocolonialism” is merely the refitting of the old colonialism to a contemporary world and political cultural order. The labor of those othered is still exploited, but said exploitation is somehow in the very same moment alleviated — and that apparently with 30¢.

Real photographs of the women on the side of the can have simply become twenty-first century iconographs of acceptable indigence. Think “Aunt Jamima,” still clothed in her class-status-cueing raiment, still brandishing a smile of contentment, only now she is receiving a so-called fair wage.

Next, when we consider the example of Africa we know that it was a continental European colonial outpost. And we know that the economic corruption and deleterious identity politics were introduced by morally challenged European powers and are sustained by African hegemons. American media and educational structuring silence this past and present in such a way that it is held external to the lived experiences of both Third World laborers and First World consumers. Capitalist frameworks of knowledge exploitation, and our participation in its perpetuation, are obscured by an altruistic desire to purchase our 30¢ redemption from having to care any further about the way in which neocolonialism cashes in on, as Jesus would assert, our neighbor.

Though we think ourselves “Good Samaritans”, in fact we have become political actors, “Levites” and “priests,” at the register in Whole Foods. No coming closer out of compassionate concern, no oil and wine of healing or bandaging of wounds, no picking up from the road side and transporting to the inn, no financing of medical care to nurse back to health; nothing of a sorts. Just 30¢ to alleviate the poverty. Oh, the suffering worker will remain in poverty, no doubt! But it will be somewhat alleviated as the oppressive economic relationship of our’s and our neighbor’s world is authorized by this insidious transaction of misdirection. The irony of the issue at hand is not that we didn’t provide a charitable service, but that we got to walk away imagining that we did. And this is, as Slavoj Zizek would say, “the commodification of suffering,” where the aim is not to end the economic relationship hinged on disparate power, rather it is to maintain it by benevolently prolonging it as though one were giving alms.

“The proper aim is to try and reconstruct society on such a basis that poverty will be impossible.” -Zizek

Your Tax Dollars At Work


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Check this out.

This is a really cool map of the US, showing where federal tax dollars are going. That is, to which parts of the country. It has a number of different categories, such as Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Income Support, Unemployment,  plus an overall picture.

Guess which parts of the country are hoovering up most of the federal tax dollars? Think it’s the welfare queens in NYC, Chicago, and LA?

Nope.

It’s the south. As in, the Red States, the ones most likely to support candidates who are screaming the loudest about the tax burden and the need to cut taxes.

The other irony is that the states receiving the most fed money tend to be on the lower end of state taxes.  Take a state like South Carolina.  SC already has a Republican Legislature, Governor, low taxes, a friendly business climate, the sorts of conditions conservatives are advocating for RI.

Guess what?  They get more back from the fed government than they pay. What this means is that Blue States, like NY and California and NJ are subsidizing low taxes in the south.

I have addressed this theme before. I apologize for any redundancy, but this situation continues.

The fact is that the sorts of policies that conservatives advocate don’t work. Last I checked, SC’s unemployment rate was pretty much up there with RI’s rate.  IIRC, they were one place behind us.

Look at the map, see the concentration of benefits in Alabama, Mississippi, Kentucky, Tennessee, and Georgia, as well as highly rural parts of Washington, Oregon, New Mexico, Michigan, and Texas.

The problem we face as a state is not something that can be solved on a state level. It’s too big. It’s a national problem. Forbes Mag recently had libertarian paradise New Hampshire as a state facing one of the biggest budget shortfalls in the nation.

We need investment in our country as a whole.  The whole country needs to address this. Cutting taxes in RI won’t solve anything. It will just make us more like South Carolina.

 

 

TOMORROW: 5th Annual Budget Rhode Map Conference


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Register now for The Poverty Institute‘s 5th Annual Budget Rhode Map Conference “From Poverty to Progress” to hear from leading experts about the economic vitality of Rhode Island and its residents.

Thursday, February 16, 2012

8:30 am: Registration and Continental Breakfast
9:00 am – 12:30 pm: Conference
Rhodes on the Pawtuxet
60 Rhodes Place, Cranston, RI 02905

$35 per person

Featuring keynote speaker Jared Bernstein 

Senior Fellow, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

Former Chief Economist and Economic Advisor to Vice President Biden and member of President Obama’s economic team.

Additional Presentations Include: 

A Skilled Workforce: Meeting the Demands of the Innovation Economy

  • Julian L. Alssid, Executive Director, Workforce Strategies Center
  • Rick Brooks, Executive Director, Governor’s Workforce Board
  • Keith Stokes, Executive Director, RI Economic Development Corporation
  • Adriana Dawson, State Director, RI Small Business Development Center

Rhode Island’s Human Service Budget: The Story Behind the Headlines

  • Elena Nicolella, Rhode Island Medicaid Director
  • Linda Katz, Policy Director, The Poverty Institute

 

State Senator Nicholas Kettle has Learned What, Exactly?

Yesterdays’s Projo ran a piece on freshman Senator Nicholas Kettle. Kettle also happens to be the youngest Senator at age 20. You might remember Kettle, who rode into office as a Republican Tea Party candidate with no experience whatsoever. He very soon established his Tea Party bona fides by insulting the homeless community in RI with disdainful and uncaring comments via email.

Here’s the relevant bit from an earlier Projo article:

In an e-mail before the hearing, freshman Sen. Nicholas D. Kettle urged Tea Party supporters to question homeless advocates and “fill up the room before the homeless folks! Help me ask why this homeless person has better clothes than I,” he said.

Kettle promised to ask tough questions and called Tassoni’s hearings a “dog-and-pony show.”

But during the hearing, Kettle apologized for the message, after homeless advocate John Joyce read it aloud and asked why Kettle hated the homeless and the poor.

Kettle said he didn’t hate the homeless, but that he sent the e-mail “out of frustration” and because he thought the hearing was one-sided.

“Don’t apologize to me,” said Joyce, who was once homeless. “Apologize to the homeless people of the state.”

So we have a young Senator making a freshman mistake right out of the box, but the forgiving among us will chalk it all up to a lack of worldly experience. Kettle did apologize after all. He said he does not hate the homeless, but was frustrated by the politics he was encountering.

But that apology rings hollow in light of more recent comments Kettle made. He now claims that one of the main lessons he learned had nothing to do with tolerance or compassion. Instead Kettle has learned the true art of politics. He has learned not to express his true views out loud, but to keep them to himself. He has decided that honestly expressing himself is dangerous.

“Watch what you put in writing,” he says now.

Going from “idealistic” Tea Party darling to disengenuous political hack in just one session has got to be some sort of record.


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387