Obama Plugs Whitehouse’s ‘Buffett Rule’ Bill


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse’s “Buffett Rule” bill got a big boost today as President Obama, long a fan of the proposal, focused his weekly address on the legislation that would prevent millionaires from shielding their earnings from income taxes.

“Now, some people call this class warfare,” Obama said. “But I think asking a billionaire to pay at least the same tax rate as his secretary is just common sense.  We don’t envy success in this country.  We aspire to it.  But we also believe that anyone who does well for themselves should do their fair share in return, so that more people have the opportunity to get ahead – not just a few.

“So every Member of Congress is going to go on record.  And if they vote to keep giving tax breaks to people like me – tax breaks our country can’t afford – then they’re going to have to explain to you where that money comes from.”

Here’s the , and here’s the video:

The Senate is slated to vote on, or at least talk about, the Buffett Rule on April 16, symbolically the day before income tax filings are due. Sen. Jack Reed, and 12 others, have signed onto the bill.

Also called the Paying your Fair Share Act, Whitehouse’s office said it will: “ensure that multi-million-dollar earners pay at least a 30 percent effective tax rate.  It would apply only to taxpayers with income over $1 million – including capital gains and dividends.  Taxpayers earning over $2 million would be subject to a 30% minimum federal tax rate.  The tax would be phased in for incomes between $1 million and $2 million, with those taxpayers paying a portion of the extra tax required to get them to a 30% effective tax rate,” according to a recent release from Senator Whitehouse’s office.

Here’s what Whitehouse told me about it when we spoke at a recent community supper in East Greenwich:

Whitehouse will be hosting a roundtable discussion on the Buffett Rule in Cranston on Tuesday. He’ll be joined by “CCAP Executive Director Joanne McGunagle and Rhode Islanders from Cranston, Providence, and Woonsocket,” according to a release. “at the Comprehensive Community Action Program’s (CCAP) headquarters in Cranston.”

The Chafee Endorsement Matters For Cicilline


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Governor Lincoln Chafee (Independent)

The big political news of the yesterday was Governor Lincoln Chafee’s endorsement of U.S. Representative David Cicilline for Congress in 2012. First, Chris Fierro of Mr. Cicilline’s office tweeted last night that Gov. Chafee attended a fundraiser for the incumbent representative.  Then the Governor’s office confirmed as much in this statement.

There’s a danger of reading too much into this, but it appears to be a good sign for both Mr. Cicilline and Gov. Chafee. It definitely hurts the campaign of Mr. Cicilline’s challenger Brendan Doherty, who could’ve bolstered his argument of being an acceptable Republican for Rhode Island by winning Gov. Chafee’s endorsement, Rhode Island’s last federal delegation Republican (it’s unlikely Mr. Doherty ever sought the Governor’s endorsement). But with no non-Democratic statewide officeholders left to endorse him, Mr. Doherty will have to rely on obscure RIGOP apparatchiks, conservative media, and the nationally-despised national Republican Party.

Mr. Cicilline won’t be overly-bolstered by this endorsement. As Mr. Nesi points out, the Governor and the Congressman are the two most disliked politicians in Rhode Island right now (of those politicians included on polls). If this was two years ago, such an endorsement might’ve shored up Mr. Cicilline’s progressive supporters, which it will somewhat help to do now. But Governor Chafee is not the same as Candidate Chafee, and his low poll numbers are likely due to a collapse in support from the labor-progressive coalition that propelled him into office in 2010. It does mean that potential Democratic primary opponent Anthony Gemma is increasingly isolated in Rhode Island’s political landscape.

I think Gov. Chafee actually benefits the most from this endorsement. There’s no doubt that the Governor has been pulling reliable duty as a Democratic Party workhorse; co-chairing President Barack Obama’s re-election committee, endorsing Senator Sheldon Whitehouse who ousted him from office, appearing with Providence mayor Angel Taveras, and now this. If the Governor makes the switch from Independent to Democrat, he might might be able to get more cooperation from the General Assembly in time for 2014, perhaps preside over a few legislative successes and stay in the limelight by virtue of party affiliation.

His fortunes are tied to those of the state’s of course, and Democrats might prefer that the Governor remains apart; setting up what could be an easy pick-up for current Treasurer Gina Raimondo without the risk of an unpopular candidate harming any down-ticket party members.

Bottled Water Purchases Dehydrate R.I.’s Budget


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Bottles and cans and just clap your hands ... or don't. The General Assembly spends more than $50,000 on bottled water and soda annually. (Tim Faulkner/ecoRI News)

Bottled water is big business in the United States. How big? Well, according to a report by the Beverage Marketing Corporation, U.S. consumers chugged 8.6 billion gallons of bottled water in 2008, representing nearly 29 percent of the liquid beverage market and exceeding sales of all other beverages except carbonated soft drinks.

You might expect ecoRI News to report on the outrageous environmental costs of depleted aquifers and plastic waste associated with the bottled water industry, or even the ridiculous retail markup on a product that most consider a human right, but this story is centered on the indubitable waste of taxpayer dollars on bottled water in Rhode Island.

In the past few years, sales of bottled water have declined slightly, but bottled water still remains the second largest selling pre-packaged beverage in the country. This recent dip in sales can be partially attributed to the decline of the economy and partially to increased awareness of the environmental costs of bottling this important resource. Nielsen Scantrack data, as of December 2011, estimated the average cost of a gallon of bottled water at $1.47. The same volume of water from the tap, at current U.S. average rates, costs 0.15 cents, or less than two-tenths of a penny.

According to information from the state’s open government portal, Rhode Island state agencies spent more than $110,000 in taxpayer dollars on bottled water in fiscal 2011. At the aforementioned average rate of $1.47 per gallon that amounts to slightly less than 75,000 gallons of bottled water.

The actual rate for public drinking water in Providence — where the largest percentage of government agencies are based — is about 0.46 cents a gallon. At that rate, 75,000 gallons of water would cost $345. At literally any rate, using tap water would have eliminated about 98 percent of that $110,000 bottled water expenditure.

These purchases seem to fly even further into the face of common sense given that as recently as 2009 Providence’s public drinking water was rated second best in the nation for taste and lack of contaminants by the Environmental Working Group.

In fact, given the state’s crumbling water infrastructure and the contamination of the public water supply by lead pipes and galvanic corrosion in some of the oldest pipes in the nation, any tax dollars spent on bottled water, rather than on improvements to our public drinking water systems, seem extravagant.

The General Assembly contracts with Coca-Cola to provide not only Dasani brand bottled water, which is simply filtered tap water, but soft drinks, as well. In fiscal 2011, the legislature spent more than $42,000 on Coke-brand beverages — about $18,000 of which was for glorified tap water and the remainder was spent on cans of soda laden with high-fructose corn syrup and artificial colorings.

The General Assembly, which is only in session for six months out of the year, also contracted with theCulligan water company and DS Waters for coolers and water amounting to more than $8,700, bringing the grand total of bottled water and cooler expenditures at the Statehouse to nearly $27,000.

Even if you don’t begrudge your tax dollars being spent on astronomical markups on a natural resource — or on your local senator and representative’s soft drink habits — there are companies in Rhode Island that could provide these overpriced products and services.

The Ocean State is home to two spring water bottlers — Crystal Spring in Middletown and Girard Spring in North Providence. Both have assured ecoRI News that they have the capacity to provide bottled water to every state agency at nearly the same cost as Poland Spring. The state even promotes an underutilized buy local campaign.

The General Assembly’s spending on soft drinks is even more mind boggling, considering that in 2004 the legislature saw fit to deem Yacht Club Soda as “Rhode Island’s Official Soda.”

While the General Assembly is freezing cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs), state lawmakers are downing plenty of out-of-state cola and marked-up bottled water. If the economy is forcing citizens to tighten their purse strings and forego raises, there’s no reason state government shouldn’t do the same. Plus, there are better ways — both environmentally and financially — to rehydrate lawmakers and staffers without buying them water in a throwaway plastic bottle with a massive carbon footprint.

… read the full story AND leave your comments on ecoRI News.

Easy Choice: Meals Tax or Inspection Dereliction


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
10% is 2 much
10% is 2 much
Is ten percent two much?

I found myself in my favorite local diner the other day, enjoying, well, a heart-unhealthy breakfast, and look what was on my table: a plea to customers to help the Rhode Island Hospitality Association combat the scourge of a 2% increase in the tax on meals. Proposed by Governor Chafee in his 2013 budget, the tax is expected to raise more than $35 million, to be devoted mostly to bolstering local school departments.

Had this new law been in place, my meal that morning would have cost 19 cents more than it did.

This, of course, is reason enough for the Hospitality Association to oppose it violently, to spend lots of money designing and printing up little cards and spreading them throughout diners across the state. Dale Venturini, the executive director, even arranged that some folks dress up in tri-corn hats and throw some tea into the river at a press event in Water Place Park last week, in symbolic opposition to the tax.

I get the point. But there’s another point, one that goes unremarked all too often: nowhere in the press materials I saw about the event. Nor was there a word about what kinds of things would have to be cut without those funds. After all, this is a tax — to be paid by the buyer, not the business — whose function is to provide money to educate children.

Governor Chafee is brave enough to say that education (and non-bankrupt cities) is worth paying for, despite the abuse heaped on him for saying so. Are any of the people who attended that press event brave enough to say what should be cut so their patrons don’t have to pay 19 cents extra for their breakfast? If so, they didn’t put it in the press release, and they weren’t quoted by any of the reporters who were able to be there. Are any of them brave enough to say what else should be taxed? Again, the press release was silent on the point.

But what does this have to do with the Department of Health?

Think back a year. What was in the headlines? An outbreak of salmonella from poorly-stored zeppole, that’s what. Sixty-six people got sick and two died. Here’s what I learned during that outbreak: Rhode Island has just seven food inspectors to keep track of 8,000 establishments. Connecticut has 360 inspectors to deal with 19,000. That is, to deal with slightly more than twice as many restaurants, stores, and other facilities, Connecticut has 51 times as many inspectors. Each inspector in that state is responsible for a little more than 50 establishments. In Massachusetts, the work load is higher, and each inspector looks after 150. In Rhode Island, each inspector is responsible for over 1,100. We’d need a staff of 53 in order to have the Massachusetts work load. Instead we have seven.

If each inspector is responsible for 1,100 businesses and there are about 200 workdays in a year, how many times a year do you think each one gets a visit? Is that enough? Remember, there are actual lives at stake here.

Dale Venturini—last year—said to a Providence Journal reporter that the association had long lobbied for more food inspectors. The Hospitality Association had even begun to perform its own “food safety audits” which are sort of like state inspections, except without the penalties. This year, Governor Chafee heard the call, and the budget contains six new inspector positions [B2-64, under “Environmental and Health Services Regulation”]. This is about one seventh as many as we’d need to get to Massachusetts-level staffing, but it’s a start and it would almost double the chances of any particular restaurant getting an inspection.

So here’s the question: If the Hospitality Association successfully kills the meals tax, should we abandon those plans for new inspectors and put that money toward education? If not, why not? We have several cities either in or contemplating bankruptcy, due in large part to cuts in state aid and rises in the cost of health care, whatever you may hear about pensions. We have a shiny new funding formula for education that, as it turns out, ignores the cost of heating school buildings (see here, question 13) and maintaining them. A budget is just a statement of spending priorities. A critique of the budget should be the same. The Hospitality Association says education spending is not worth 19 cents on my breakfast. And it also says more food inspectors are important. More important than what?

Dale Venturini is on record demanding an increase in state spending. But where should the money come from? I eagerly await the next press release from the Hospitality Association on the subject.

Join Me for a Free Tax Preparation Clinic


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

During these tough economic times, I want to make sure that every family in the First Congressional District has access to the federal resources available to them. That’s why I hope you can join me a for a Free Tax Preparation Clinic at 9:00 AM this Saturday, March 31st, at the Boys and Girls Club of Pawtucket. At this event, constituents with an annual income below $50,000 annually will be able to prepare and file their taxes with IRS-certified volunteers, who will also be able to provide information about special tax credits for which you may qualify, including the Earned Income Tax Credit and the Child Tax Credit.

Click here for more information on this upcoming event. To RSVP, please call Lisha Gomes in my Pawtucket office at 729-5600.

Cicilline Comes Out Strong Against GOP Budget Bill


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

On the Huffington Post and on the House floor, Congressman David Cicilline has come out strong against the House GOP budget proposal.

Today, after voting against it yesterday, he penned an op/ed for the Huffington Post today critical of the bill writing, “less than a year after a similar proposal was defeated, the House Republican leadership held a vote on a budget proposal that would extend tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans, make deep cuts to programs that serve middle class families and end the Medicare guarantee for our seniors.”

Cicilline spoke out against the bill earlier in the week saying, “My home state of Rhode Island has one of the highest unemployment rates in the country. My constituents need common-sense solutions that will create jobs and get our country back on the right track not another extreme proposal from the House Republican leadership.”

He said the bill would give the richest Americans an average tax break of $150,000 a year.

The top-down budget proposal passed the Republican-controlled House largely along party lines. Politco said of the bill:

“Just 10 Republicans defected, and the 228-191 vote gives the embattled GOP leadership what it most wanted: a show of party unity behind a bold election-year vision that includes new private options for Medicare and a simplified Tax Code. But the price paid by Congress will be big: wrecking havoc with hard-fought bargains under the Budget Control Act and inviting another shutdown fight with Senate Democrats and Obama unless the House again reverses course.”

Ultrasound Bill Bad Idea for Women, Dr.’s, RI


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Here at RI Future, we give the Providence Journal editorial board no small amount of grief for their reasoning and positions. But we were very pleased to see them take a strong stance against Rep. Karen MacBeth’s bill that will legislate mandatory ultrasounds for women who have decided to have an abortion.

“This approach is a very bad idea,” they wrote in their editorial on the bill this morning. “Doctors and women should be able to make these often difficult decisions with a measure of privacy, and without the cumbersome imposition of the state dictating what should be said and done. Regulations should be based on the health of patients, as much as reasonably possible, rather than on trying to enforce particular religious or moral views of politicians.”

We couldn’t agree more.

As Paula Hodges of Planned Parenthood told us when we first broke this story: “Politicians forcing doctors to use an ultrasound for political – and not medical – reasons is the very definition of government intrusion. Rhode Island lawmakers should not be interfering with personal, private medical decisions that should be best left to women and families and their doctors.”

The Projo points out, as we did last week, that doctors who don’t comply would be subject to fines starting at $100,000 and go up to $250,000. This is a ridiculously large fine, considering there is no medical issue here – only a political one. I suspect the high dollar amount is more about State House politics than anything else in that they might be able to get a few votes be negotiating down the fine.

That said, given the lack of support in the legislature for reproductive rights it might not be all that hard to win over votes on this bill. Less than a third of the Democratically-controlled General Assembly is on record as being pro-choice.

To that end, local women need everyone to let their elected officials know how they feel about this issue that seems to be doing little more than distracting government from dealing with the stuff that is really plaguing our society.

Basic Oil Economics or No More Jed Clampetts

T"...when up from the ground come a-bubblin' crude."oday’s Morning Joe program on MSNBC featured a typically brain-dead discussion of oil prices. I’ll summarize…

Joe Scarborough: We’re producing more oil, but the price is still high. That’s un-possible!

Time Mag’s Richard Stengel: I know. Can you believe it?

What’s missing from this discussion – and all the blather we’ve heard and will hear from the GOP during the 2012 election – is a fundamental understanding of what it means to produce petrochemical liquid fuels.

Oil Pumping Basics

Since before the Macondo explosion and leak, I’ve been a fan of The Oil Drum, a peak-everything blog that focuses on the oil patch. You really can learn quite a bit from the authors and the commenters, who tend to be oil field vets. Here’s what’s most important to this discussion:

It costs money to get oil.

The photo above is from the opening credits of the classic TV show The Beverly Hillbillies in which Jed Clampett is “shootin’ at some food, when up from the ground comes a-bubblin’ crude.” Half a century ago, that was a plausible scenario – oil deposits almost on the surface could be breached with virtually zero effort. Dig a hole anywhere in Texas, and you’re rich!

Those days are long, long gone. Hence peak oil. Peak oil does not necessarily mean that there’s no more oil in the ground; it means that we’ve reached (and surpassed) the point of diminishing returns in terms of the cost of getting oil.

Think about this: the Macondo well – referred to by workers as ‘the well from hell’ – required sending robotic submersibles a mile down in the ocean and then drilling a hole an additional two miles into the earth. So you’re reaching down a total of three miles just to get to the “discovered” deposit before you find out what’s actually down there. (Satan, as it turned out…)

That kind of engineering doesn’t come cheap.

If there were an easier and cheaper place to get oil, don’t you think BP would have opted for that? Of course they would have, but the fact is that there isn’t an easier place to get oil. Hence Macondo.

“Economic” Oil Extraction

It’s silly to criticize Obama or any part of the US government for restricting off shore oil production because the oil companies are already sitting on a giant number of leases. The reason that these leases aren’t being used is that it’s not “economic” to go get the oil – the price doesn’t justify the cost of extraction.

There’s a clear correlation between the price of oil and the amount of production, and this confirms the basic peak oil argument. The cheap and easy oil is all gone, so prices have to reach certain thresholds before it’s worth the effort to go get the oil we know is in the ground.

This is why 2008 was a banner year for deep water oil. Prices sky-rocketed, and suddenly it was worth the effort to drill down three miles to get to a deposit. Drilling platforms were double- and triple-booked. Even though prices fell by half from their peak as a result of the financial meltdown, they quickly rebounded to the $70 – $80 region.

After a brief hiatus, it was back to work for the rigs. A prime driver of BP’s foolish haste capping Macondo was that the drilling rig was already late for its next assignment. They also wanted to skip a step and turn the exploratory well into a production well to get the oil to market quickly.

With the current price of oil (NYMEX) over $100, seriously whacky oil sources become profitable – shale oil and even drilling in the Arctic Ocean. That is insane!

So, we know that we can get more oil if the price is high enough. Therefore, producing more oil won’t make prices go down to what they have been in the past; it will only make prices pull back from their highs.

So, sorry Newt. $2.50 per gallon gas is exactly as plausible as you becoming President of the United States.

The Two Main Drivers of Oil Extraction Costs

Obviously, the simple costs of getting labor and machinery out to the oil deposit’s location and then drilling, lining and capping the well represent the primary factor in the equation that determines if an oil well is economic to drill. Equally obvious is the fact that the market price – and no other factor – influences the decision to produce or not to produce. There are likely a few exceptions of deposits close to population centers or very close to coastlines, but there are so many leases on known deposits that fights over the exceptions are political shenanigans and little more.

Here’s what’s not obvious and what’s really behind the peak oil equation – the amount of energy it takes to produce energy. Deep sea submersible, massive mud-pumping ships and floating cities called “drilling platforms” don’t run on unicorn tears. They mostly run on oil.

As oil gets harder and harder to reach, it takes more and more energy to pump that next barrel. And even within a single deposit, the first barrels come out on their own but as pressure drops it takes more and more energy to get each successive barrel. Pumping the bottom of a well that’s three miles below the earth’s surface requires a lot of suction!

Compare the easy Texas drilling of the Jed Clampett days to the process of separating oil from Canadian tar sands or shale. It takes a lot of money and energy just to get the crude. Then you need to include the costs and energy inputs of distillation. That doesn’t come for free either.

The bottom line is that high gasoline prices are here to stay, and there’s nothing that any politician can do about it. Anybody who says otherwise is either a liar or a fool.

Struggling Cities Also Have Highest Foreclosure Rate


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Click on the image to see which communities have been hit hardest by the foreclosure crisis.

Providence, Pawtucket, Central Falls and Woonsocket are not only four of the most “highly distressed” cities in the state in terms of municipal budgets, they also have the highest percentage of foreclosures, according to a new report from HousingWorks RI.

Central Falls has the highest percentage of its housing stock lost to foreclosure since 2009 with 13.66 percent of the supply. Providence is the second highest in the state with 9.78 percent. Woonsocket is third with 8.21 percent and Pawtucket fourth with 6.5 percent. West Warwick, the other city identified by Gov. Chafee as being “highly distressed” was sixth after North Providence.

“No community in Rhode Island has been immune to the volatile housing market, but foreclosures affect communities differently depending on the location of those foreclosures,” reads the report. “For example, in the state’s urban communities, high concentrations of foreclosures can blight entire neighborhoods with boarded up buildings.”

Also, the total number of foreclosures in Rhode Island went up in 2011, after dipping down in 2010, according to the report. In 2010, there were 1,891 residential foreclosures in the state, an average of 157 a month. In 2011, the number of foreclosures increased to 2,009 – or an average of 167 per month, according to the report. In 2009, there were 2,840 foreclosures in Rhode Island.

With almost a third of foreclosures in the state since 2009 being multi-family homes, Rhode Island’s rental home economy has been decimated by the foreclosure crisis, says the report – noting that in three years the state lost an estimated 6,300 rental properties.

“The increased demand for apartments coupled with a decreased supply has made affording a quality rental home much harder for Rhode Islanders,” reads the report. “The high rates of multifamily foreclosures in the state have resulted in the rental housing market becoming one of the most vulnerable segments of our economy. 40 percent of Rhode Islanders rent their homes and 1 in 4 of those renters are extremely cost burdened, spending more than 50 percent of their income on housing expenses.”

Central Falls and Providence have the highest percentage of multi-family home foreclosures, accounting for more than 50 percent of the total in the state.

“Each multi-family foreclosure affects multiple rental homes, which in turn threatens tenants with possible eviction,” according to the report. “For every multi-family property foreclosed, approximately two to three families find themselves without shelter.”

HousingWorks RI offered some potential fixes for this crisis in its report:

“For Rhode Island to remain truly competitive in attracting and retaining businesses and growing a vibrant workforce, the state must elevate long-term affordable housing into its overall economic development strategy and develop a consistent funding policy for long-term affordable housing development and operation.

The $25 million housing bond included in the Governor’s FY2013 budget is a first step, but lawmakers must consider a $50 million housing bond in order to maintain the success of the state’s Building Homes Rhode Island program. Investment in affordable housing programs will help the state emerge from the foreclosure crisis economically stronger.

Other states are taking decisive actions to grow their supply of long-term affordable rental homes. For example, in Massachusetts, the Governor’s FY 2013 budget recommends spending almost $375 million on housing programs, an increase of more than $25 million over current spending in FY 2012. In Connecticut, the Governor recently announced that he is substantially increasing the state’s commitment to affordable housing as a driver for economic growth, bringing that state’s total commitment to nearly $500 million over the next ten years.”

Click HERE to see the full report.

Dear RI: Where’s the Work?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

For those who have never had a day of unemployment that they did not choose, there are no words which can describe the state. For those who, like me, have, you know the feelings. You know the self-loathing, the worthlessness, the despondence, the anger. But most of all, the fear. There is a special terror reserved for the jobless, a dark vicious terror that constantly lurks in the back of one’s mind. It is the terror that the bills will catch up with you. The terror that this may not be temporary, that you may never work again. That it will catch you, and in the end, kill you. And you carry that with you for months.

The job hunt is nearly as disheartening. Each letter sent out is a gamble, each interview a risk. Plenty will offer you tips, plenty will suggest you talk to so-and-so, plenty will say “perhaps if you tried here.” And you force yourself to nod, because you think to yourself, “I have done all of that already,” but you do not wish to get into a fight. But no one will treat you with respect; be it the callous souls who tell you, even in the midst of the worst economic catastrophe since the Great Depression, to “get a job,” or the people whom you are applying for a job with. You will be left on the line for weeks, sometimes without ever getting a response telling you someone else has been hired. Alternatively, they will send you some of the cruelest words in the English language, “thank you for your interest…”

I have sympathy for employers; it is not easy to pull the trigger and tell the job-seeker they will not be hired. But I have no sympathy for the politician who sees the suffering of their policies and yet continues with their madness. The politician says that they have imposed their policies so cities and towns “will get their fiscal house in order.” But they have not imposed fiscal order; they have imposed pain and suffering. Tell the victims of these policies that the political leadership has brought fiscal order. Tell the family who has abandoned their home and is living in their car because property taxes went too high, or the landlord forced to raise rents on tenants they know cannot afford it. Tell the vast majority of the people of this state who pay taxes at a rate nearly twice that of those who can most-afford it that we are bringing fiscal order. Our political leadership has a perverse definition of “order”.

Where’s the work that was promised? I was fortunate enough that I could work for free as a volunteer while I searched for a job. Most are not that lucky. They languish, in trouble, waiting for work that will end their weariness and replace it with accomplishment. Through this hell that has been imposed, they march onwards, driven by the idea of hope, our state motto. The motto so sacred to Rhode Islanders that we placed it on our flag so that it might symbolize us. The Statehouse should be the house that hope built. Instead, it is hope’s marble mausoleum.

The party in power names itself “democratic”. Perhaps they need a lesson in democracy. The word means the people rule. The people. Not the Speaker of the House nor the President of the Senate. If the representatives of the people delivers a bill, “democracy” means the leadership must consider it and bring it to vote by those same representatives, not hold it for further study, their epithet for saying they have killed it. This means that if the people cry out for fairness in our taxes, you cannot dismiss this cry as not having a chance. The people get to decide that, too.

But our “leadership” tells us that we must wait, that the tax policies they enacted six years ago during good times have not yet had their full effect. And yet, our unemployment rate has risen back to 11%, while the rest of the nation sees declines. Our “leadership” tells us we must not tax job creators, while the state loses the very jobs we are asking the creators to create. Our “leadership” tells us business favors tax consistency, but only if that consistency is going down. Our “leadership” tells us they want Rhode Island to be a place where anyone can live, but their policies force cities and towns to raise property taxes so high no one can live here.

I say this as a Rhode Islander. I say this as someone who only recently found a job in this state after nearly a year of trying, and I was not confining myself to only the state. I looked beyond our borders reluctantly, because deep in my heart, I know there is truly no other state for me. I am not ashamed or abashed to say I love Rhode Island, in all its oddities. I do not believe any true Rhode Islander can contemplate fleeing this state without any regret or sadness. And yet, that contemplation has been very real to me. And it is real to the thousands of Rhode Islanders who remain without work, many who have been searching longer than I have, many of whom are more deserving then I am.

There are those who will despise me for what I’ve written here. They will attack me, perhaps call me a demagogue. They will find fault with whatever I say, and seek to undermine my reputation. I do not care about my reputation though, I care about Rhode Island. The naysayers will point to our 11% unemployment rate and deride the citizens of this state as stupid for not abandoning it. They will insult the place of my birth, and me, not knowing or comprehending that the reason the unemployed stay is because as much as circumstances prevent them, they also have hope. They believe in this state. The naysayers look at an idea and say “we cannot do this,” and they will find such and such a reason to stop it. But those with hope will look at an idea and say, “how can we make this work” and search for ways until they have exhausted all possibilities.

Ship Building

We want to make our state work. We want to rebuild this state with our own sweat. We are not asking the politicians in the government to break a sweat, we will do that. We will work the hours, we will do the labor. We ask merely that the politicians on Smith Hill have the decency to relieve the pressures that prevent us from doing so, that they reverse their mistaken policies and free the people of this state to work. That they keep those already working employed. That they enforce policies that actually will bring the idle gainful work. That they take no more from those who have already sacrificed too much.

There is a dividing line between people. On one side are those who do not love this state, who cannot imagine a way out of this crisis, who call for it to be abandoned or else denigrate its people and its government. On the other are those who wish to give their lives for this state, who wish to improve it, who see its possibilities even in the midsts of its failures. I ask the leaders of this state to be the leaders that we know they can be, and lead this state to greatness. Where’s the work? It is before us.

Why RI Should ‘Ban the Box’ on Job Applications


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Every week in Rhode Island thousands of people are ushered through the court system, and every year nearly 20,000 will be released from prison.  There are 30,000 people currently on probation, as we have one of the highest rates of government supervision in the nation.  Over 100,000 Rhode Islanders have some manner of conviction on their records.  The effects of those convictions can vary greatly.

A culture of criminal background checks has cast a cloud of discrimination upon many people and their families.  HB 7760 and 7864 [concerning pre-interview criminal background checks] accept the fact that we live within one community- and we need to look carefully at policies that can go awry of their original intent regarding the safety of all.

I am in some ways typical of a person with a criminal record, particularly as we can only be evaluated on an individual basis.  My past is terrible.  The things I did two decades ago are despicable, and some have argued that I should continue to be punished and a life of homelessness or unemployment is appropriate.  However, whether I lived out such an existence in prison or the community, I would become a burden on the state.  On the one hand, my crimes are far more severe than most of the convicted; yet on the other hand, I bring more capacity to the table than most of the convicted.

In 2005 I was released from prison after 11 years, 8 months and restricted by an electronic monitoring ankle bracelet for one year.  Prior to my release (as a pre-condition of getting parole), I was only able to find one job, and it took me two hours to get to work.  After a few months, and with school starting soon, I sought a job closer to home in Woonsocket, at a Sears department store warehouse.  I did not check the “box” asking if I had been “convicted of a felony in the past seven years.”

My interview at Sears went well.  I submitted to a drug test, and upon the second interview I mentioned he would need to speak with my parole officer before taking the job.  When we got into my very distant past, it was clear I was not getting the job despite my willingness to work hard for under $8 per hour.  Others like me generally do not get that far, as many have been convicted in the past seven years.  He may have been more comfortable if my history were less severe, yet if that lighter crime were more recent, I probably would not have made the interview.

Last summer I transferred my probation to New Orleans and looked for an apartment.  I introduced myself as a Tulane Law Student.  After going through the process, I asked if they discriminated against anyone.  The agent assured me they did not, and requested my non-refundable $50 application fee.  I asked about “people with convictions.”  She did not know; they use a third party to do their background checks, but she was helpful enough to find their policy:  Anyone with a felony conviction within the past seven years is barred from living in River Garden, one of the largest housing complexes in New Orleans. And anyone who ever had a crime of violence or property damage cannot live there.  This is a common policy.

Last year we introduced the “Ban the Box” bill to This Committee.   We have gained the support of many, as I expect you will continue to see in the legislative process.  Some of you likely recall who came out in opposition: a lobbyist who represents background check companies.  They could not provide any evidence of people with criminal records creating less effective workplaces, yet evidence of these policies decimating communities is overwhelming.  They are likely familiar that their companies frequently violate the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), which has standards for checking people’s information.  Background checks have a consistent error rate, evidenced by the approximately 100,000 voters barred from the polls in Florida in 2000 because their names were similar to others who were barred by felony convictions.

Background check companies are blunt data miners who rarely recognize corrections or expungements, and certainly cannot assess the actual job applicant- whether 20 days or 20 years after conviction.  This Legislature has held many hearings on expunging criminal records, even reforms proposed by the Attorney General.  Those expungements are useless where background check companies do not update material.  Their goal, understandably, is profit rather than safety.

When NY Governor Cuomo was Attorney General, he filed a series of discrimination suits against companies based on FCRA, Title VII, and New York anti-discrimination laws.  He elicited millions of dollars in settlements and voluntary reforms in their hiring policies.  Appropriate law in Rhode Island could provide guidance and protection for our own companies, allowing them to avoid the type of hiring policies that the EEOC has condemned.  The EEOC is stepping up its enforcement, and recently negotiated a $3.1 million settlement with Pepsi, including a change to their hiring practice, as they had conducted blanket denials based on criminal records.

My prospects of returning to Rhode Island and raising my daughter are largely tied to what this legislature does in the coming years.  Nearly a third of public school students have a parent who is under government supervision like myself; would I be barred from volunteering?  Barred from school property?  Will I be allowed to work based on my skills and efforts?  Will I be allowed to rent or buy a home anywhere I like?  This nation has been on a dangerous slope over recent decades, and if we do not reverse course we will have a caste society that forces me to create a different economy, a different school system, and a different community.  This is not what I want, and I am confident that it is not what the people of Rhode Island want.  Ultimately, we will all sink or swim together.

These comments were submitted to the House Labor Committee and entered into the record at its hearing on Wednesday on a bill that would make concerning pre-interview criminal background checks, or as it has been called “Ban the Box” because it would make it illegal to have a box on a job application asking if one has been convicted of a felony.

Big Turnout Last Night For Trayvon Martin March


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Last night’s ‘ReBoot approved’ event started with a rally at the Harry Kizirian Elementary School with three or four speakers, marched over to Chad Brown, and then directed attendees to Kobi Dennis’ regular Tuesday night community meeting. Turnout was awesome, probably about 250 folks there: lots of kids, lots of teenagers, lots of parents. This was my camera phone pic of the night.

Click HERE for a list of other local events calling attention to this tragedy.

 

Two Great Events Tonight: Pecha Kucha, Concentric


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
RI Future's Libby Kimzey presents at a recent Pecha Kucha. (photo by Frank Mullin)

Out of 502 cities around the world that host Pecha Kucha Nights bringing together creatives from all walks of life. Providence Pecha Kucha Night holds the global record for having 36 straight events (one each month) over the past three years–unprecedented!

This also highlights the fact that Providence (and Rhode Island) are home to innovative, creative talent that are not only willing to present, but participate, each month on worldwide stage as part of this movement. Congratulations goes out to Stephanie Gerson (who established Providence Pecha Kucha Night), Michael Gazdacko (who serves as the emcee and coordinator of these events), the Providence Pecha Kucha Night board and all those loyal participants who come out each month to celebrate creativity here. 7:00 p.m.-10:00 p.m. (presentations start promptly at 8:20 p.m.–it’s the official starting time for Pecha Kucha events internationally), at Roots Cafe, 276 Westminster Street, Providence, RI.

http://www.facebook.com/events/254225387995919/

Concentric aims to bring together all parties under the banner of design here in the Ocean State. It’s an informal quarterly get together for people interested in design or who work in design (designers, artists, engineers, architects, faculty, students, etc.). Matt Grigsby (of Ecolect) and his incubator space, Anchor, play host this evening and well over 100 professionals and policy makers are planning on attending. 5:00 p.m.-8:00 p.m. at Anchor, 42 Rice Street in Providence.

Tonight: Drinking Liberally Recognizes RI Women

In recognition of  National Women’s History month so we thought it fitting to tip our glasses to leading ladies from around Rhode Island.

Special guest speakers in March will include Lt. Governor Elizabeth Roberts, State Representative Grace Diaz, Women’s Fund of RI Executive Director Marcia Cone and RI NOW President Carolyn Mark.

We hope you can join us on Wednesday March 28 at Wild Colonial (250 South Water St.) from 7pm – 9pm.

If you haven’t already, LIKE our new Facebook Fan Page (www.facebook.com/ProvidenceDrinkingLiberally) so you can enjoy DL tidbits throughout the month as you await the next installment of progressive cheers & jeers.

Prospects Brighten for Transit Financing Fix


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Over the last 31 years, the Rhode Island Public Transit Authority (RIPTA) has come to the public 28 times to tell us of the need to either cut service or raise fares, sometimes both. Last summer RIPTA proposed a 10% service reduction in the face of a 4.6 million dollar deficit. While RIPTA has been able to forestall such drastic cuts by finding internal efficiencies, negotiating with the Amalgamated Transit Union, and carrying forward a deficit of 1.7 million dollars into next year, nothing has yet been done to fix the source of RIPTA’s financing problems.

In fact, the projected deficit for 2013 is 8 million dollars, a significant deterioration in the authority’s finances.

The problem is that RIPTA derives the majority of its operating budget from proceeds of the gas tax, and the yield per penny of the gas tax continues to be in perennial decline as fuel prices increase and people drive less or buy more fuel-efficient vehicles. Of course, the sky rocketing fuel prices also put upward pressure on the operating budget, so RIPTA gets squeezed on both ends just as demand for public transit is highest.

Unsurprisingly, public transit advocates have long been trying to push legislative reform to either supplement the gas tax or switch to a different financing mechanism so that RIPTA can preserve and even expand service to meet growing demand. These efforts have not been rewarded, but there are reasons to believe 2012 will be the year that public transportation finally gets the support it needs. What makes this year different?

Three things:

1. With leadership from new board chairperson Warwick Mayor Scott Avedisian, RIPTA management and labor have put aside their differences and are putting forth a united effort to secure more funding.  The Board of Directors unanimously endorsed the Public Transit Investment Act at their last meeting, and Avedisian, RIPTA CEO Charles Odimgbe, and ATU local 618 President Paul “Fuzzy” Harrington have all been on message at the Statehouse. These circumstances stand in stark contrast to last year when RIPTA was noticeably absent on Smith Hill until the very end of the legislative session, and even then seemed unsure of what it was asking for.

2. For the first time, Rhode Island’s public transit riders have organized to advocate on their own behalf. RIPTA Riders, a grassroots group of more than 600 members that largely coalesced last summer during the service cut public hearing process, has brought an astounding amount of pressure to bear on state policy makers. The Save RIPTA petition that the group started now has more than 5000 names on it, including 28 members of the House. You can see and hear more about the RIPTA Riders story here.

3. Urgency. Staring at a minimum of a 9.7 million dollar deficit, the problem can no longer be avoided. If public transit does not get additional funding this session, there will be service cuts of at least 20% in the fall. Such cuts would be a serious blow to the fragile economy of the state, particularly with gas prices as high as they are. More than ever, Rhode Islanders need affordable and convenient access to transportation.

With RIPTA Riders, the traditional coalition of transit advocates, and RIPTA itself all pulling in the same direction at the right time, transit financing reform is finally getting serious attention. You can get on this bus, too. Please take a second to click on the petition link above and put your name on it, and once you’ve done that please also send your State Rep a letter asking them to support the Public Transit Investment Act.

Department of Education Posts Funny Numbers


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Woonsocket High School (photo courtesy of Woonsocket School District)
Woonsocket High School (photo courtesy of Woonsocket School District)
Woonsocket High School (photo courtesy of Woonsocket School District)

What do you think about our state’s shiny new education funding formula? Neither Woonsocket nor Pawtucket are big fans and they are headed to a court date next month with the RI Department of Education (RIDE) over it.

Using measures that used to be part of the funding formula, these two cities are taxed more heavily than any other city or town in the state, save only Providence and Central Falls.  But RIDE only suggests they raise taxes more instead of counting on state aid.

To great fanfare in 2010, the legislature enacted a new funding formula to dictate how much state money is shared with the state’s cities and towns.  The new funding formula was widely praised for taking the uncertainty out of education funding for the state’s school districts.  There are a couple of problems, though.

The first, and biggest is simply that the funding formula does not provide enough money to the places that need it the most.  The school committees of Woonsocket and Pawtucket have filed a suit against the state over the adequacy of the funding for education.  In a fairly catty reply to press coverage of the suit, RIDE put out a packet of graphs showing that over the past 10 years, Providence tax collections have risen repeatedly while Pawtucket and Woonsocket have not.  RIDE calculated that if Woonsocket and Pawtucket had increased their tax levy by as much as Providence had, Pawtucket would have $2000 per student more to pay for education, and Woonsocket $1240 more.

The clear message: Providence has done what it takes, and raised taxes substantially over the past 15 years and Woonsocket and Pawtucket have not.  What a bunch of slackers, right?  Maybe the supplemental tax under consideration in Woonsocket to fill their budget hole is just catching up for a decade of bad behavior?

Of course the problem with the RIDE data is that Woonsocket and Pawtucket were already heavily taxed 15 years ago.  All this data shows is what the increase in taxes has been.  How heavy are the taxes in those cities?  Has that changed in the last 20 years?

There is a better way to look at this.  A number called “Tax Capacity” measures the relative wealth of cities and towns, and another number called “Tax Effort” measures the amount of that wealth that is actually taxed.  These numbers used to be part of the funding formula — the version that was ignored during the last 15 years — and their definition is in state law (16-7.1-6).  RIDE publishes these numbers on their Infoworks web site, but they use the 2008 data, and several of the values are wrong, possibly typographical errors.  (The errors have been brought to RIDE’s attention, but they have neither defended the numbers nor changed them.)

But with the formula laid out in state law, anyone can calculate tax capacity and tax effort, so here they are, using 2010 and 1990 data, ranked by 2010 tax effort.

Municipality Tax Capacity Tax Effort 1990 Capacity 1990 Effort
Providence 31.99 266.69 52.25 199.42
Central Falls 14.18 227.04 22.56 255.17
Woonsocket 27.95 218.75 46.46 163.61
Pawtucket 32.14 199.99 56.36 134.54
North Providence 57.96 173.82 82.36 109.62
West Warwick 59.25 148.32 76.11 105.27
Cranston 74.85 143.92 98.90 101.32
Johnston 89.71 127.47 98.16 100.01
East Providence 74.46 124.05 94.45 102.59
Warwick 105.71 118.28 114.16 111.69
Glocester 100.74 105.64 100.72 103.42
West Greenwich 136.97 103.69 127.14 98.71
Tiverton 100.89 103.34 119.27 77.35
Hopkinton 102.63 103.34 93.73 88.76
North Smithfield 109.08 102.47 128.73 75.36
Warren 100.79 97.88 87.90 105.25
Foster 118.45 97.65 113.93 106.14
Richmond 105.32 91.88 90.36 103.55
Lincoln 137.63 89.19 129.73 90.57
Coventry 90.97 88.62 86.32 91.72
Smithfield 127.90 87.08 119.00 84.65
Burrillville 84.58 86.34 75.99 95.80
Scituate 144.76 82.21 141.15 70.86
Middletown 155.20 79.26 104.08 83.13
Cumberland 105.12 76.54 111.39 80.11
North Kingstown 162.68 75.52 147.41 79.21
East Greenwich 223.05 72.81 226.97 63.86
Barrington 232.53 70.32 208.23 67.09
Exeter 141.01 67.07 96.87 85.42
South Kingstown 158.75 66.63 123.55 80.64
Bristol 118.14 62.62 95.31 79.72
Newport 195.41 62.52 136.90 91.27
Westerly 223.38 61.82 175.68 62.07
Portsmouth 217.32 57.84 149.34 72.72
Narragansett 257.28 53.30 212.11 60.18
Charlestown 298.42 44.52 247.45 52.99
Jamestown 384.86 43.61 306.80 43.23
New Shoreham 1670.44 22.17 1062.39 35.24
Little Compton 648.51 21.52 346.28 37.87

(The 1990 data is from the 1992 “Annual State Report on Local Government and Finance” put out by what was to become the Office of Municipal Finance.  The 2010 levy data was provided to me by OMA and the assessment data is at muni-info.ri.gov.  I also used census data from 1990 and 2010.)

What you see from this table is that Woonsocket and Pawtucket were already among the most heavily taxed towns in the state in 1990.

These are relative numbers, where 100 is the state average in each column, so you can’t compare the 1990 to the 2010 numbers directly, but you can look at the growth of the indicators behind them.

Between 1990 and 2010, the assessed value of property in Woonsocket, equalized and weighted according to another formula in state law so one town can be compared with another despite differences in assessment calendars and practice (it’s called EWAV, and it includes an adjustment for the town’s median income) rose more slowly in Pawtucket and Woonsocket than in any other municipality in the state, an annual rate of 3.8% for Pawtucket and 3.86% for Woonsocket.  Over those same 20 years, the EWAV values in Providence rose an average of 4.8% each year.  By comparison, Warwick saw growth of 6.3% per year, and Portsmouth saw 9.0%.

Here’s the data (EWAV is in thousands):

Municipality 2010 EWAV 1990 EWAV Growth Rate
Pawtucket $3,013,403 $1,427,388 3.80%
Woonsocket 1,516,559 710,634 3.86
Providence 7,505,015 2927,949 4.81
Central Falls 362,161 138,758 4.91
North Providence 2,449,538 921,354 5.01
East Providence 4,614,434 1,658,822 5.24
West Warwick 2,278,583 776,596 5.52
Cranston 7,927,256 2,622,321 5.68
Warwick 11,513,435 3,399,716 6.28
Tiverton 2,097,388 595,065 6.50
North Smithfield 1,719,858 471,040 6.68
Johnston 3,400,091 908,254 6.82
STATEWIDE 138,666,859 34,979,107 7.12
Glocester 1,293,518 323,974 7.16
Warren 1,409,088 348,860 7.22
Scituate 1,969,910 482,021 7.29
East Greenwich 3,862,957 938,751 7.32
Cumberland 4,640,261 1,127,569 7.32
Burrillville 1,777,974 429,962 7.35
Foster ,718,814 171,410 7.43
Barrington 4,996,527 1,150,455 7.61
Coventry 4,196,466 935,387 7.79
Smithfield 3,610,988 794,954 7.86
North Kingstown 5,676,661 1,222,312 7.98
Middletown 3,302,183 706,047 8.01
Lincoln 3,826,882 816,075 8.03
Newport 6,351,713 1,347,027 8.06
Narragansett 5,378,526 1,108,006 8.21
Hopkinton 1,107,157 224,583 8.30
Bristol 3,572,581 718,532 8.34
Westerly 6,706,033 1,323,097 8.45
Jamestown 2,740,490 534,634 8.51
Charlestown 3,077,225 558,787 8.90
Portsmouth 4,978,614 877,550 9.06
South Kingstown 6,408,042 1,060,821 9.40
Richmond 1,069,497 168,553 9.67
Exeter 1,193,592 184,403 9.78
West Greenwich 1,107,062 154,772 10.33
Little Compton 2,983,453 403,052 10.52
New Shoreham 2,312,906 309,597 10.57

In other words, not only were Pawtucket and Woonsocket among the most heavily taxed communities in the state in 1990, but over the last two decades they had less growth in their capacity to levy taxes than any other town in the state — including Central Falls.  Providence raised more money over the last two decades than either town, but they also saw substantially higher growth in their capacity to do so.

It’s easy to cluck one’s tongue about the slackers in Woonsocket and Pawtucket, but the evidence is that those city governments may have known something about their cities that the data crunchers at RIDE don’t.

 

 

 

Providence Responds to the Murder of Trayvon Martin


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 2448

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Saturday night. Impromptu march. I got this report in:

“there was a march in memory of treyvon martin of about 40+ people on
friday which started on thayer street and made its way down to as220.
it was pretty darn good for something that got thrown together in 2 hours.
some chants for future marches were:
no justice no peace, treyvon rest in peace!
and
you killed treyvon, and now it’s on!”

 

Sunday night at 6 pm. Community Forum on Trayvon Martin Murder. Great, thoughtful and heartfelt discussion, about 50 people for two hours. Photo from my camera phone attached.

 

Sunday night at 7 pm. March from Central High School to Burnside Park. I got this report in:

“There were about 13 people. I did not have pictures of the march because I was in front of the line, holding the sign. But there was someone there with a camera. I can get a picture for you. “

 

Tuesday (Tonight) at 8 pm. Providence “Justice for Trayvon” Community Rally & March

“Meet Tuesday March 27th @ 8PM at Father Lennon Park in Providence (60 Camden Avenue in Providence next to Madeline Rogers Rec) to show your commitment to justice in the Trayvon Martin case.

We will meet at the park, and then march through OUR community and end at Kobi Dennis’ ongoing Tuesday night Community Rally to discuss what we as a community need to do to protect OUR youth. It’s On Us… remember that.

Bring signs to express how you feel about the situation. Where a Hoodie if you want to show your solidarity with all the Trayvon’s in our communities that may or may not have made the news headlines. Greeks are encouraged to wear para.

This is a PEACEFUL event. Come with the right attitude, or please don’t come at all.
For more information contact ReBoot401@yahoo.com or (401) 338-7606”

 

Friday, March 30, 12 pm. Rally on the State House lawn.

“Im gathering people to rally infront of the state house in downtown providence,ri @ 12 noon time till ? Bring signs and if u like wear a hooded sweatshirt.. Its Non violent event”

 

Friday, March 30th 7:00 p.m. Central High School 70 Fricker St.

“Outraged over the murder of Trayvon Martin? You are not alone!  Join us Friday evening at 7:00 for a march in honor of Trayvon Martin.  We’ll gather in front of Central High School (Where Westminster, Cranston, and Fricker Sts. meet). After the march, we’ll head over to Libertalia, 280 Broadway, for a film screening and discussion. Wear a hoodie and/or dress in black.”

 

Wednesday, April 4, 4:00 pm  Martin Luther King JR Unity Day at City Hall.   Here is a link to the video promotion.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MnZTtYLmFrQ&feature=share   Contact Bill Bateman, liberator401@cox.net for more information.

 

Please add information on events I missed in the comments.

Public Defender Wants to Legalize Pot


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Add Rhode Island Deputy Public Defender Barbara Hurst to the list of people who think the state should decriminalize possession of less than an ounce of marijuana. In fact, she endorsed legalizing and taxing marijuana too.

She sent a letter to the Senate committee considering a bill tonight that would make possession of less than an ounce of pot punishable by $150 ticket instead of up to a year in jail.

“The RIPD is of the opinion that the changes contained within these two pieces of legislation, while taking different approaches, make sensible and timely modifications to our state’s criminal justice and enforcement policies The RIPD is also of the opinion that the collateral benefits to be realized from these changes would be added revenue to the state, and a more efficient allocation of limited criminal justice resources.

Seventy years of marijuana prohibition have turned a little-known medicinal herb into a product that’s been used by nearly half of all Americans, including President Barack Obama and California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. Given this widespread use and acceptance the state has no business making responsible, adult marijuana consumers into criminals. And independent scientific research consistently concludes that marijuana is far safer than alcohol- both in risk of addiction and toxicity.”

Ending the prohibition on marijuana, she said in her letter, could save the state some $12 million.

Read the full letter HERE.

Dooley Takes Issue with Op/Ed on Tuition Increases


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

It isn’t often that an editorial is so off-the-mark as to warrant news coverage, but such is evidently the case with the Projo’s take on tuition increases from Saturday morning.

In an article in today’s Journal about a Q&A session with URI president David Dooley, Gina Macris writes: “He spoke at length about the ‘great deal of misinformation’ about the causes of higher tuition and mounting student debt, singling out ‘misguided editorials like the one in The Providence Journal on Saturday.'”

Misguided indeed.

The editorial board seemed to be writing about the rising cost of tuition, then quickly veered into how college isn’t for everybody – almost as if this was part justification for the cost of college rising.

“For many years, college tuitions have risen at up to three times the general inflation rate,” Saturday’s editorial said. “This has happened as society’s leaders constantly harp on the importance for many young people of getting a college education. That idea is exaggerated in our view; for many people, obtaining a post-high-school vocational education would be considerably more useful than going to a liberal-arts college.”

It’s true that tuition is rising far faster than general inflation. And it’s true that our leaders “harp on” the importance of a higher education (as well they should). It’s also true college isn’t for everyone and many are better served with a vocational education. But to put those three statements together makes it seem as if the Projo thinks we are wasting our time trying to make college available to the masses and we might as well just send the smartest and richest and let the rest enjoy auto shop – or eat cake, as it were.

Dooley took issue with the Projo’s insistence that “curious courses” and high-paid staff were driving up costs at URI.

“A proliferation of curious courses is not a cost-driver at URI,” Macris said he said. And she also quoted him as saying, “we are driving up higher education costs because we are anxious to add higher-paid administrators is one of the sillier things that I’ve read.”

Dooley knows the real reason tuition is going up, and he explained it to me last week.

“Public higher education is increasingly seen really out of necessity I think in the view of a lot legislators as a discretionary part of the state budget,” he said. “They have long assumed … that if they fund higher education less and ask families to do more, Americans have such a strong belief in the value of higher education, particularly public higher education, that they will pay more and they have been willing to do that for two decades. ”

Dooley called this model “unsustainable.”

Don’t Fear the Hoodie


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
American Flag Hooded Sweatshirt
Geraldo Rivera Screenshot
Geraldo Rivera (via TalkingPointsMemo)

So, when the Trayvon Martin slaying entered the national consciousness, it became clear to most that a single person acting alone had killed a harmless youth and not faced any penalties for it. The youth’s crime? Being black, mainly; although his killer, George Zimmerman, claims he looked drunk.

Obviously, this set-off a whole host of people to debate the events of the night, and names like Emmett Till were tossed around. Some have focused on Florida’s “stand your ground” law, which allows someone to utilize self-defense to justify a killing even if they didn’t make an attempt to flee from their assailant. So, it appears to me that a single man, with a history of bad judgement calls, killed a teenager for no reason other than his suspicions.

But you know what, there was a possibility I hadn’t considered. Trayvon Martin was wearing a hooded sweatshirt. And Geraldo Rivera thinks this was as much a cause of his death as anything else. Now, this started creeping into territory that gets me a little scared. See, I’ve been to Britain, and in Britain, Mr. Rivera’s remarks would not be that far off from what people are willing to think. See, in Britain, the hooded sweatshirt has been transformed from an unobjectionable piece of clothing to the dreaded “hoodie” bringer of riots, crime, and destruction. I don’t know where along the way “hooded sweatshirt” became reduced to “hoodie” but I think that reduction could possibly be part of the problem. A hooded sweatshirt is just a sweatshirt with a bit of cloth to keep your head warm. A hoodie is a whole style of clothing. I actually think I grew up without distinguishing between a regular sweatshirt and a hooded sweatshirt when speaking.

American Flag Hooded Sweatshirt
(via kissied.wordpress.com)

It’s gotten so bad that a six-year old was actually banned from a supermarket for wearing a hooded sweatshirt that had been bought from said supermarket. That’s where Britain’s paranoia has brought it. They also rely on the famous “Anti-Social Behaviour Order“, labeling a whole generation “ASBOs” in slang for such innocuous activities as “loitering” or “spitting”. Luckily, ASBOs may be going away.

Fear of the hooded sweatshirt may not. Mr. Rivera is right in that it’s a pretty useful garment in avoiding a camera. But does that mean we go about stigmatizing what is a really comfortable and useful piece of clothing simply because of a few bad apples? It’s like banning cars because they kill people. Or because they’re used in crimes. At the end of the day, it shouldn’t matter what type of clothing you wear; whether you’re white or black, whether you’re Latino or Asian. You have the right to walk to the corner store and not be killed.


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387