Block Island, Fourth of July


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
The West Side of Block Island. (Photo by Bob Plain)

Even with the big police crackdown this year, which was evident at all the well-known party beaches, still no place celebrates the Fourth of July like Block Island. Bristol’s parade might be older and Boston’s festivities more filled with pomp and circumstance, but no other town I’ve ever spent summer’s best holiday in parties quite as hard as New Shoreham, RI.

With the exception of the fireworks on Tuesday night and few drinks at The Oar and at my friends’ house yesterday and coming into town this morning to find an internet connection, I instead have been hiding out on the West Side of the Island trying to find a little peace and quiet. Here are some tweets, pictures, a short video of the truly amazing fireworks display.

And here’s some more pictures, tweets and video from the next day:

Social Justice Patriots


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Each summer, over 9,000 NEA members from around the country gather at the NEA Representative Assembly, one of the largest democratic representative bodies in the world. Yesterday, my friend and colleague John Stocks, NEA’s Executive Director, gave the following remarks, which should be of interest to progressives everywhere.
——————–
You know, each year July 4th is the day when we honor our country’s birth.

It’s a day that summons in each of us our own sense of pride about being Americans.

It’s a day in which we celebrate the patriots whose intellectual and physical bravery over 200 years ago created this grand and audacious experiment that we know as the American democracy –
an experiment built upon freedom and the pursuit of happiness.

We celebrate July 4th by honoring those who thought and fought to establish this country and those who fought wars to keep our democracy intact…patriots who paid the ultimate price so that we can continue to enjoy freedom as individuals and live peacefully together in a democracy.

And we still have patriots – our sons and daughters in uniform – who risk their lives day in and day out. And we pray they return home safely to their families.

Today, we honor those contributions and their sacrifices.
But for me, that’s only part of the celebration of our nation’s independence.

I actually view patriotism through a broader lens.

Our American DNA is embedded with a profound sense of possibility, an unshakable belief in a better tomorrow, an abiding faith that the American Dream is not only real, but a belief that there are many Americans who are willing to ensure that it’s truly accessible for everyone.

Too often we overlook the part of our national portrait that celebrates those Americans who are driven by their conscience to make America a more perfect union….those who are constantly urging America to live up to its promise of equal opportunity and justice for all.

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr said that to be “divinely dissatisfied” with America is to love America. I agree with him.

I have a name for people who are divinely dissatisfied with America, yet love America’s promise.

I call them social justice patriots.

I have tremendous faith that we as a nation will continue to progress because of the social justice patriots who valiantly fight every day to make America live up to its promise.

Social justice patriots challenge our present in order to forge a better future for all of us.

Let me give you an example:

The Declaration of Independence contains the aspirational phrase that we are “dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.”

But we know that phrase is woefully inadequate to capture our glorious diversity and our society doesn’t always guarantee equality.

Every time we challenge ourselves to broaden the inclusiveness of that phrase,
we are actually engaging in the patriotic act of making America a more perfect union.

And for me, a “more perfect union” means making America a more just society.

I have a deep reverence for NEA members.

You’ve played a huge role in fostering social justice patriotism throughout American history.

Not only have educators instructed each generation about the core principles upon which America was founded, but you have, in many instances, acted as the conscience of the nation we love.

It was educators, through this Association, who sought funds for the education of freed slaves and their children after the Civil War…

who spoke out against the treatment of Native American children in government schools…
who supported a woman’s right to vote.

It was educators, through this Association, who spoke out against the internment of Japanese-American children and their families.

It was educators, through this Association, who demanded equal educational opportunity for children with disabilities.

It was educators, through this Association, who challenged the absurdity that Spanish-speaking children were incapable of learning like other children.

It was educators, through the American Teachers Association, and then the National Education Association, who opposed the segregation of Black children in schools that were inherently unequal.

It was educators, through this Association, who took a stand to support equal treatment for same-sex couples.

We have every right to be proud, both of our Association and of our country.

That doesn’t mean that we’ve always arrived at these proud moments easily as an association.

We wrestled with these issues as an association, and we came down on the right side of history.

Adrienne Rich, an American poet, said:

“A patriot is one who wrestles for the soul of her country as she wrestles for her own being.”

So in thinking about being a social justice patriot, we must not only think about challenging our country to be better, but we must also challenge ourselves as individuals to do better.

Are we fulfilling our American calling to stand up for the rights of others?

Are we doing enough to honor our core values of Democracy, Equal Opportunity, and A Just Society?

I see breathtaking examples of NEA members educating America in order to make a more perfect union.

And we should celebrate them….but we have more to do.

Let’s start with democracy.

Since the 2010 elections, 30 states have passed laws designed to suppress the voting rights of millions of Americans.

THESE LAWS THREATEN OUR DEMOCRACY!

They’re designed to make it more difficult for people of color to vote.

It is estimated that these insidious laws could prevent 3.2 million voters from taking part in the 2012 elections

But friends, there are social justice patriots in our midst.

Jill Sissarelli, a government teacher at New Smyrna Beach High School in Florida, conducts a voter registration project every year as part of teaching her students about the importance of their civic responsibility.

But what Jill didn’t know was that Florida’s new law makes it more difficult to register people to vote.

As a result, Jill faced thousands of dollars in fines just for trying to help her students register….

But Jill persevered to protect her project….and she is a shining example of a social justice patriot.

I am extraordinarily proud that part of our election efforts this year will be to enlist NEA members in the fight against voter suppression…..to help educate Americans about where to vote, the requirements about voting, and the importance of voting.

But we have more to do.

Let’s talk for a moment about equal opportunity.

What we are experiencing now is the serious erosion of the middle class
And worse yet, the war on poverty has turned into a war on poor people!

Today, the average CEO of a Fortune 500 company makes about 600 times more than the average education support professional; back in the mid-1950s it was only about 20 times more.

And in our post-Citizens United world, corporations and the people who run them can afford to buy the politicians they want….

The politicians like Scott Walker and John Kasick and Rick Snyder who will make it easier for their corporate friends to make more money and avoid paying their fair share.

Friends, time and time again I have seen that the only effective answer to organized corporate greed in America is organized labor!

And the “one-percenters” in this country know that – it’s no secret why they’re trying to destroy the labor movement.

To the one percent, organized labor stands between them and their ability to have complete control of our political economy.

But I say we are social justice warriors… fighting to preserve the dignity of all those who work hard, pay their taxes, and simply want to send their kids to college and have a decent retirement.

But, we know that the growing economic inequality in America has touched more than just our own lives.

It is touching our students and their families.

In America today, while the rich grow richer, the number of children living in poverty continues to grow.

Today in America, almost 16 and a half million children now live in poverty.

One of every five children in our classrooms lives in poverty.

What’s even more devastating to hear is that one in 45 children in America experiences homelessness each year.

That’s 1.6 million children who are sleeping in cars…under freeway overpasses…living in tents and abandoned buildings….and getting ready for school in public restrooms.

The one percent doesn’t see these children every day.

They don’t even know their names. But we do.

We know them, we feed them, we teach them, we comfort them.
They’re on our school buses, in our cafeterias, in our classrooms.

They come to school hungry.
They start first grade a year or two behind their middle-class peers.

As educators, you know better than anyone what a toll this takes on children.

You know better than anyone they need individual attention, high expectations, and a ready reserve of emotional support.

They need teachers and education support professionals who will lift them up and be the wind at their backs.

But just last week, Mitt Romney said he wants Americans to “get as much education as they can afford.”

Well sisters and brothers–

If we can afford wars that never end in faraway places,

if we can afford enormous tax breaks for some of our richest corporations,

if we can afford to finance the export of American jobs overseas,

then we can afford to do whatever it takes and spend whatever it costs to ensure every single one of our students receives a quality education!

But there’s another issue related to equality of opportunity that has evoked some very ugly rhetoric – and that’s the issue of immigration.

There are 2.1 million young people now in the United States who came to live here as children with their parents. These young people are prevented from going to college or applying for jobs because of their legal status.

The Dream Act would provide these young people with the opportunity to contribute to the only country they call home.

And yet, the opposition to the Dream Act in Congress is fierce.

But there’s hope, sisters and brothers.

Our courageous President Barack Obama recently signed an Executive Order halting the deportation of hundreds of thousands of “Dreamers.”

Now we all know he’s been vilified for doing so. But it was the right thing to do!

Here again, we have examples within the NEA family of social justice patriotism in the struggle for immigrant rights.

Our members in Arizona and Alabama have fought against discriminatory immigration laws.

NEA members in Tuscon have fought against a ban on ethnic studies so that students have access to a rich curriculum that honors their diverse heritage.

Our members across the country have cared for children who have been separated from their parents due to immigration raids in workplaces.

I am so proud that we support the Dreamers and the DREAM Act.

I am so proud that NEA fights for an immigration policy that doesn’t split up families and doesn’t harm children.

And I’m even prouder of NEA members who will raise their voices,
open their homes, become the equivalent of foster parents to children who have done nothing wrong, but simply attend school here in the United States.

That’s social justice patriotism!

I remember fighting the white supremacist skinheads in Idaho.
They had moved into the Aryan Nation’s compound in Kootenai County.

They bombed my priest’s home.

They attacked my friend, Vicky Keenan–a Native American woman–and her son, Jason.

They bombed our Post Office and the federal building.

We were all scared to death. But we were also outraged. So we fought back. We organized.

I saw people like NEA delegate Joann Harvey and Professor Tony Stewart stand up against this evil, despite all of the threats against them.

I saw other people who had been cowed into silence find their courage and learn to speak out.

Eventually, with the legal help of Morris Dees of the Southern Poverty Law Center, the Aryan Nations’ compound was demolished!

Collective action for social justice can bring about incredible change!

But we also have an individual responsibility to wake up every day and question ourselves, our beliefs, our behavior.

After all, a more perfect union also requires each of us to be better human beings.

When we see injustice or discrimination, we need to confront it and speak out.

But discrimination isn’t just perpetrated by individuals; it’s also systemic.

In New York, for example, between 2006 and 2009, the police stopped and frisked an astounding three million people,

And you guessed it, 90 percent of them were Black or Latino youth.

That’s why I’m proud that NEA is a partner in the NAACP’s new Campaign to End Racial Profiling.

Last month, my daughter Emily and I had the privilege of joining their first demonstration—a silent march down 5th Avenue to protest the New York Police Department’s stop and frisk policy.

We walked with Marian Wright Edelman, longtime leader of the Children’s Defense Fund.

We walked with Ben Jealous, courageous President of the NAACP.

We walked with tens of thousands of others who believe the stop and frisk policy is DANGEROUS to our democracy!

Black, Latino, and Muslim men and boys between the ages of 14 and 26 are being stopped on the streets, thrown up against the wall and frisked, without cause, and some of them were simply trying to go to school.

It’s wrong. It’s unjust. And it’s not just happening in New York City.

When any law-abiding American cannot walk freely on any street or in any community in this country without looking over his shoulder, it means he is not truly free.

Imagine being tormented by the knowledge that his own community views him first as a suspect and not as a neighbor.

It doesn’t matter that he might be a straight A student.
It doesn’t matter that he might volunteer in his community.

To that young man and so many other Americans, we are robbing them of liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

And we as a progressive labor union and a social justice organization have a responsibility to take a stand and say “No More!”

You see, cannot have a truly free America without being a truly just America!

But for us, there are three disturbing questions we need to confront:

Does racial profiling start in our schools?
Does the pipeline to prison for minority youth begin in school?
And if it does, what are we going to do to stop it?

Every year, 3.3 million K-12 students are suspended from school and African American and Latino students represent a disproportionate number of those suspended.

I am incredibly proud to share that as part of our partnership with NAACP, NEA is helping to develop a racial profiling curriculum for educators, students and community leaders.

We must ensure that this topic can be discussed responsibly and constructively in America’s schools, so that we can begin to end this behavior.

We will partner with other organizations to challenge and change zero-tolerance school discipline policies and replace them with what we know works for students and for schools.

Shoving our kids out of schools, shoving them away from the support they need, denying them access to the tools that will equip them for life is the ultimate act of intolerance and condemnation.

And if we don’t do something, we will perpetuate the school to prison pipeline.

Again, I agree with Dr. King. To challenge what we see, to truly wrestle with the difficult and painful, is to demonstrate the ultimate devotion to righting what is wrong.

As a country and as an organization we have always done this.

It was former NEA President Mary Hatwood Futrell who once declared that “NEA is an organization with a soul.”

Well, it’s time now for another generation of NEA leaders and activists to put the power of our soul to work to defend democracy, to fight for equal opportunity, and to create a more just society!

Be the activists for social justice and equal opportunity in America!

NEA, on this 4th of July, we have so much to celebrate!

We are bonded together with a glorious commitment to fight injustice.

We have an unbelievable legacy of contribution to this country.

And I know that every single one of you is as proud as I am to be a part of an organization that strives to make America a more perfect union for every single man, woman, and child.

NEA members,
Keep Standing Strong!
Keep Fighting for Justice!
Keep Fighting for our Students!

We are ALL social justice patriots and we ARE the NEA!

Thank you so much!

Projo Misses News at Doherty, Brown Event


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Photo courtesy of Pat Crowley. @PatCrowleyNEARI

So, if you still have doubts that the ProJo editorial board is the tail wagging the newsroom’s dog; those fears should be laid to rest after the Newspaper Spin Cycle of record’s coverage of the Brendan Doherty event at Metacomet Country Club in East Providence.

Journal scribe Phil Marcelo, covered all the political details about how Sen. Scott Brown made the trip down from Massachusetts, gave a closed-door speech to the big donors and then left quickly. He also covered the fact of the approximate amount of money the event raised and even mentioned how both men met as youngsters at a basketball camp. Marcelo also goes on to note how Doherty was impressed with Brown’s call for bipartisanship.

Now here’s where I take exception to the ProJo’s coverage. When a story mentions bipartisanship, shouldn’t it at least include some of what the other side might have to offer, or object to? Maybe an example of Sen. Brown working in a cooperative manner?

Not only was there no mention of the other side’s views in this story, there wasn’t even any mention of the protesters outside the entrance to the country club. Members of Planned Parenthood and several labor groups were outside the event to make attendees and passers-by aware of extreme right-wing positions Mr. Doherty has staked out for his campaign. My question is: How is this not news?

Maybe if the ProJo goes back to fairly and accurately reporting the news and keeping its opinions on the editorial page, the paper can gain back some of its credibility. If not, I fear for my former co-workers on Fountain Street, as readership declines and the state will lose a once Pulitzer Prize-winning newspaper, to be replaced by a print version of Fox News.

Progressives Should Care About Pension Security


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Gina Raimondo, Linc Chafee and Allan Fung, at  an event in 2011 to launch the campaign to decrease pension costs. Photo by Bob Plain, courtesy of WPRO.

I suspect if that if named a United States Senator tomorrow (might as well give the right-wing immediate heartburn at that prospect) my committee assignment of choice would be the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, the so-called, and when run correctly, aptly named HELP Committee. Putting four important issues so remarkably interlinked together was wise indeed, but those linkages are not always obvious to some who deem themselves progressives.

My progressive friends breathed a sigh of relief last week when the Supreme Court upheld the Affordable Care Act, appreciate the importance of a strong public education system, and usually understand the basics of workers having a voice at the table through collective bargaining rights. But last year, so many progressive legislators, despite making commitments to the contrary, often in writing to the groups that endorsed them, voted to implement some of the most draconian changes in the country to Rhode Island’s state-run public pension plans. And many of their progressive supporters seem to be equally confused by the issue or just wish it would go away. It will not, and should not.

The elected officials who broke their commitments know who they are. While, to the dismay of many, I remain personally fond of Rhode Island General Treasurer Gina Raimondo (who made no commitments on the issue), she essentially told the General Assembly that our unfunded pension liability was a “weapon of mass destruction,” and with remarkable haste in a virtually unprecedented special session, the Rhode Island Retirement Security Act of 2011 was enacted. And it was enacted with a lot of nominally progressive votes. I have more sympathy for elected officials willing to make amends, those who felt caught up in the same type of political tide that led federal elected officials to support the ill-advised war in Iraq (a vote which was at least a contributing factor to Hillary Clinton losing the Democratic Presidential nomination) and now acknowledge their errors in judgment, than for those who are angry they have been asked to account for their votes. I do give kudos to Providence Mayor Angel Taveras for negotiating a solution with active and retired employees as the state should have done and progressive legislators should have insisted they do.

All of that said, this article is not primarily directed at elected officials who need to reconsider their priorities, but at the progressive community in general. It is ironic that many of my more conservative acquaintances, while still maintaining their distaste for both unions and defined benefit pensions, confide in me their belief that the State of Rhode Island acted illegally in breaking the covenant it had with those workers and retirees. It pains me that some of the progressives with whom I have fought side by side in so many battles do not understand either the legal or moral obligation the State has to those workers, or that society should have to provide real retirement security to all workers. Worse are those that buy into, and repeat, the false choices argument – that if the state honors commitments to its public sector workers, it won’t be able to tighten the safety net for those most in need. Have the recent tax cuts for the wealthiest among us have been forgotten so quickly? False choices indeed!

Progressives believe that the entire arc of an individual’s life should be imbued with justice. That includes not only a world free from discrimination, a clean environment, the right to choose, the right to marry the partner of your choice and help for those who need it the most, but access to quality, affordable health care, an excellent public education, a good job with good wages where workers have a voice, and a secure retirement.

Apparently, one can still be a Democrat and ignore some of these issues – but you can’t claim to be a progressive.

Butke’s Campaign Puts Focus on Education ‘Reform’


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Maryellen Butke (Photo courtesy of RI-CAN)

Maryellen Butke’s campaign for state Senate will raise an interesting debate about the relationship, or lack thereof, between the so-called education reform movement and the progressive movement. While in name they may sound like close cousins, in practice they are often not.

Education reformers (or deformers, if you don’t like what they do) often push for charter schools at the expense of existing public schools, and charter schools often don’t allow its teachers to bargain collectively, putting the movement at odds with organized labor and often attracting big money from union-busting corporations.

By running for state Senate – especially for legendary progressive legislator Rhoda Perry’s seat – Butke’s campaign will become ground zero for this debate in Rhode Island for the next few months.

Yesterday, in a post about Senator Rhoda Perry retiring, I mentioned that Butke is a liberal who supports charter schools. Two of RI Future’s regular contributors, who follow education issues closely, quickly took umbrage with my description.

“I think a more accurate description of Ms. Butke’s positions would be pretty politically liberal on some issues and extremely conservative on others, particularly labor and education (her primary focus), where she and her Wal-Mart and Wall Street-funded organization have championed right-wing policies that have and will do major damage to public education in RI,” wrote Aaron Regunberg.

Pat Crowley, who works for the state’s largest teachers’ union, followed suit: “Got to agree with Aaron here.  Labor issues can’t simply be shoved to the side.  Especially when so many teachers are women, and so many retirees are women, the attack on their voice on the job is part of the national war on women.  How liberal is that?”

Then, interestingly enough, Butke got a chance to respond with a guest post on Ted Nesi’s blog. She wrote:

I have never considered my views on education liberal or conservative. Though a lifelong progressive, it never occurred to me that teaching and learning in public schools was a partisan issue. At its core, education reform is about improving educational outcomes for kids. How could anyone – Democrat or Republican – disagree with that?

As it turns out, education is one of the most politicized debates we are having in this country today. But it doesn’t have to be this way. Those of us who believe in the tenets of change aren’t interested in partisan politics. We believe in accountability for the adults responsible for our children’s futures, in high-quality public school choices for parents regardless of demographics or geography, and in flexibility to let principals and teachers do whatever it takes to improve student achievement. This doesn’t mean we are anti-union and it doesn’t mean we have negative feelings towards teachers.

My feeling is that Regunberg, Crowley and Bukte somehow need to reconcile their somewhat disparate points if Rhode Island is to holistically improve the education it offers. We need to offer a better education to all students without making life any tougher for our hard-working teachers, who hold one of the most important jobs in our community. That’s the progressive solution to reforming public education.

I believe Butke when she says she isn’t anti-union per say, but some of the people that pay her salary and fund the organization she works for certainly are. That can be a tough dichotomy to reconcile.

Butke and I have long talked about getting together for a big picture discussion on how the charter school movement fits – or doesn’t – with the progressive movement. Here’s hoping that this post and her candidacy helps to make that happen … and that they can help Rhode Island to figure out how it wants to reform public education.

 

Are Non-Christians Not Welcome in Providence?

Peter Montequila, the owner of Finest Car Wash has stated a variety of reasons for having erected a cross on a publicly owned median strip on Pleasant Valley Parkway in Providence. According to one story the cross was built because the Fourth of July (or Memorial Day) was coming up. Montequila also claims he placed the religious symbol there to demonstrate solidarity with those who want the war memorial topped with a cross in Woonsocket to stay on public land. On the other hand, perhaps Montequila feels entitled to act as he did, having maintained the median by mowing the lawn, installing a sprinkler system, and planting flowers as part of what appears to be a city sponsored adopt-a-spot program. Still another reason for the cross, according to the owner, is that he seeks to honor veterans.

Of course, it’s not possible to honor all veterans by erecting a religious symbol particular to only some of them. How could a Christian cross possibly honor a Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist or atheist veteran? Let’s be honest here: Peter Montequila only wants to honor Christian veterans with this cross, and more particularly, he only seeks to honor the tiny subset of Christian veterans who agree with him about the irrelevance of the First Amendment and the Constitution of the United States.

Read this quote from Montequila on 630WPRO:

an answer to atheist, and I’ll be quite honest with you I don’t really want them for my customers, let them go to an atheist car wash or an atheist gas station, we want customers that feel the way we do. [emphasis added]

What if you don’t feel the way Montequila does?

If it really offends them, you know what? Don’t drive down the street, or move someplace else or get out of the state, that’s how I feel.

The use of religious symbols to differentiate between us and them, those in our group and those outside our group, is a very natural human urge. When these symbols are used in a way that respects diversity of opinion and the rights of all citizens, then the lively experiment that is Rhode Island pays huge dividends in freedom of conscience and safety for minority opinions. But when these symbols are used to mark the territory of a putative majority interested in marginalizing those with differing opinions, the effect is to bully at best, and to terrorize at worst.

A cross has long been the symbol of hope and devotion to millions of people throughout history and throughout the world, but it has also been used as a symbol of persecution and conquest. Like the use of any symbol or word, the exact meaning of the cross depends on its context. For instance, compare a cross placed in the Basilica of Rome as opposed to one burning on the front lawn of a black family in the 1930’s.

The cross in Providence is a poor attempt at honoring veterans, as it only honors Christian veterans. It is a poor attempt at promoting Christianity because Montequila is only interested in promoting a particular brand of Christianity, one that seeks to blend church and state despite our Constitutional protections against such mixing. There are many kinds of Christianity, and many who identify themselves as Christian believe that a cross has no place on public land.

But the cross on the Pleasant Valley Parkway median in Providence is very good at promoting one message. And that message is this:

If you don’t believe in our particular kind of God, we don’t want you in Providence.

The fact that Mayor Angel Taveras has decided not to ask for the removal of the cross seems to indicate tacit governmental support for this message, much to the disappointment of those who take church/state separation seriously.

Unfortunately for Peter Montequila, non-Christians, including atheists and humanists, are not going anywhere. Instead, we’ll be sticking around and insisting that the government stay neutral in matters of religion by not allowing public land to be co-opted by those with a theocratic, anti-American agenda. Being a minority, our point of view won’t always be popular, but it will always be necessary. There isn’t, after all, one religious point of view today represented among the population of Rhode Island that wasn’t once held by a minority itself.

Sen. Rhoda Perry Isn’t Seeking Reelection


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Senator Rhoda Perry, a strong and influential voice for progressives all over Rhode Island, announced today that after 22 years serving the people of the College Hill area of the East Side in the State House, she won’t be running for reelection this year.

“As a private citizen, I will continue to fight for the progressive causes in which I believe,” she said according to a press release sent out this morning. “It has been an honor and a pleasure to represent the residents of the East Side during the last two decades, but it is time for me to step aside and give new leaders the opportunity to emerge.  Together with my colleagues, and so many committed Rhode Islanders, I am proud of all we have been able to accomplish.”

According to the press release, some of her “major legislative accomplishments are enacting needed protections for our state’s nursing home residents, adopting mental health parity, gaining funeral rights for domestic partners, leading the successful battle for medical marijuana, increasing penalties for sex trafficking, putting in place the first anti-racial profiling law in the Northeast, gaining significant adoption reforms and helping to realize separation of powers.”

She is the third-longest serving member of the Senate, next to Senators Dominick Ruggerio and Mary Ellen Goodwin. Perry is one of the most progressive legislators in the state Senate and indeed the entire State House.

For 20 of her 22 years, Perry has served with her good friend, Senate President Teresa Paiva Weed, whom she is pictured with above.

“I’m going to miss Senator Perry,” Paiva Weed said. “She’s been a friend and a colleague and a strong advocate on so many important issues. She knew how to successfully achieve passage of important legislation without ever compromising her values, and she was never afraid to fight for more progress on an issue.”

Senator Juan Pichardo, also a progressive state Senator from Providence, said Perry has been a mentor to him, a positive force at the State House and a role model for the many women who have gotten involved in politics over the past two decades.

“Rhoda Perry has been an icon for the progressive movement in Rhode Island as well as an icon for women in politics,” he said. “Her holistic approach to policy and her compassion with people and her respect for different points of view has been a great thing for those who served with her.”

He said she will be very difficult to replace.

“We thank Senator Rhoda Perry for her years of dedicated public services,” said Kate Brock of Ocean State Action. “Senator Perry has been a champion for the progressive values and ideals we work for everyday. She will be sorely missed at the Statehouse. While Senator Perry is impossible to replace we look forward to helping elect a strong, progressive leader to represent the East Side of Providence.”

Ray Sullivan, of Marriage Equality Rhode Island: “Senator Perry was a tireless advocate for her constituents and a tenacious voice for the LGBTQI community. Her leadership helped advance the rights of countless Rhode Islanders, and we are grateful for her remarkable commitment to public service. She was the lead sponsor of the 1995 civil rights act barring discrimination in employment, housing, public accommodations and credit on the basis or sexual orientation, and has been the longtime prime sponsor of marriage equality in the Senate. Most recently, she led the effort to pass the transgender hate crime reporting act, which was singed into law by Gov. Chafee this year. ”

An unrelenting champion for civil rights, she fought the battles that weren’t always popular, but unmistakably necessary. We will miss sincerely miss our dear friend, Rhoda, and thank her for truly making a difference.”

Ian Donnis, of RIPR, reports that Jessica Holden Sherwood is running for Perry’s seat, as is charter school advocate Maryellen Butke, who works for RI-CAN.

Sherwood is a progressive, who testified for income tax reform this year at the State House and helped to organize local activities in conjunction with Netroots Nation this year. Butke is pretty politically liberal, but she may have a hard time appealing to progressives because of her work with RI-CAN, which advocates for more charter schools in Rhode Island.

Gordon Fox Is ‘Miffed’ at RI Future


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

The ProJo reports that House Speaker Gordon Fox, or at least his staff, is “miffed” that Mark Binder, who is challenging him for his seat in the House, is blogging about it for RI Future. Who can blame him? I’m sure Fox would much prefer to run either unopposed or against a candidate that doesn’t write for a local news website. (Here’s a piece I wrote this weekend about why we allow candidates to blog on RI Future.)

Well, we’re a little miffed, too. Here’s why:

The Providence Journal misreports Binder’s role with RI Future. Political Scene says this morning that Binder is “now a columnist for a left-leaning website.” But at least one of the authors of the weekly political column knows this isn’t accurate – Binder was a contributor long before he declared for office. In response to an email from Kathy Gregg last week about Binder’s role with RI Future, I wrote, “Mark was an RI Future contributor before declaring for office.” Our archives corroborate this as well – so does his post that the column quoted.

On this point, we believe the newspaper owes its readers a correction. To incorrectly claim that Binder is a new RI Future writer gives credence to the false claim that we are targeting Fox. Projo readers should absolutely be informed that the Speaker’s staff thinks this, but they should know that there is evidence to the contrary.

We’re also a little bit miffed with Fox’s spokesman Larry Berman, who told the Projo that RI Future “has chosen to target one of the most progressive Speakers of the House in modern history.”

This is not at all the case. Berman and I had several long and heated discussions about Binder’s role with RI Future last week, and I explained to him what was in my other piece this morning on why candidates blog for RI Future and what was in my email to Gregg: It isn’t an endorsement, Fox is more than welcome to blog as well and candidates’ posts are about giving Rhode Islanders access to information about the progressive movement, not picking winners or losers.

We’re not targeting Fox. In fact, we wholeheartedly agree with Berman’s description that he is one of the most progressive speakers in recent history. We’re giving a progressive the ability to express his message to Rhode Islanders. That’s what RI Future does! The converse would be to silence one of our contributors because he is taking on a powerful member of the establishment, something that I think would be unfair both to the small business we are trying to get off the ground and to the people of Rhode Island.

Some have suggested to me that there will be political ramifications for giving a political opponent of the Speaker of the House, known as the most powerful person in state government, a platform. I don’t think there will be. I believe that Gordon Fox and his staff respect greatly the rights of a free and open press as well as a diversity of voices in the local marketplace of ideas.

Why RI Future Allows Candidates to Blog


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
State House Dome from North Main Street
State House Dome from North Main Street
The State House dome and the Independent Man as seen from North Main Street. (Photo by Bob Plain)

A number of people have asked about my decision to allow candidates for public office contribute posts to RI Future about their campaigns, so I thought it was a worthwhile editorial decision to address here.

To set the scene, Libby Kimzey and Mark Binder – both of whom are self-described progressives, semi-regular contributors to RI Future and active members of our online community – are running for seats in the state House of Representatives.

It’s my hope that they both post many more times throughout the campaign season, and I hope many other candidates for office do as well. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse and Congressman David Cicilline, both self-described progressives, have contributed posts in the recent past and I hope they take the opportunity to do so again during the campaign. In fact, there is literally little that would make me happier than if every candidate for office posted to RI Future during the campaign. Maybe if they all commented with their real names, to boot!

I know the internets are still a relatively new animal to some, and more than a few wish news and information still came packaged the way it did 20 and 50 years ago. But we can’t turn back now any more than the early humans could have left fire alone. Nor should we. Candidates for public office having another way to communicate with people is a good thing – especially when the people can communicate right back, and publicly. And the more the web is incorporated into the political process, assuming it’s kept free and open, it should serve to mitigate the problems with unfettered money in the political process.

Being a blog that blends news reporting with opinion writing on issues that matter to progressives, we’re in a pretty unique position to give our audience – a vast majority of whom I’m guessing are voters – a variety of ways to learn more about the candidates – one of those ways is the candidates can submit their own posts. The candidates, for the most part, seem appreciative of the opportunity as well. (Though I wish more weren’t so afraid of the comments section … the anonymous comments aren’t nearly as influential as some seem to think – people generally recognize them for what they are: a sometimes good and sometimes bad side dish meant to add a little value to the main course. Conversely, the ones with real names carry greater weight.)

Here are our general guidelines for submissions, in particular as applied to contributors who are running for and writing about their candidacy:

  • We want to know about progressive issues rather than about your campaign or yourself, though we veer from this frequently and interpret it rather loosely and broadly.
  • There is no non-compete clause inherent with you post so don’t be surprised if you see a post from your competition on RI Future as well.
  • There are plenty of other places where you can dump on the progressive movement, if that’s your thing, so we choose not to compete in that sector of the marketplace of ideas.
  • It’s neither a tacit or an explicit endorsement for the seat you seek.

This last point is an interesting one, especially as it applies to Binder’s campaign against House Speaker Gordon Fox. Binder is probably more progressive than is Fox. But Fox may well be the best Democrat to lead the House of Representatives. It’s possible we could give Binder a platform during the campaign, but still endorse his opponent.

I probably should have done a post prior to campaign season letting our readers and all candidates know we planned to do as much … just as much as a news/opinion hybrid blog is a good medium for communicating with candidates, it’s also a pretty good place to tackle issues of journalistic integrity and political communication.

Drowning DLT to Replace People with Robots


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

As we all are by now aware, Rhode Island’s unemployed and under-employed population are preparing themselves to receive fewer and less effective services from the State of Rhode Island. The unprecedented reduction in workforce does not correspond with the extremely high workload created by the second highest levels of unemployment in the nation, and stagnant level of jobless citizens seeking help.

But wait! Never fear because technology is here!

Currently a system has been implemented called “The Call Back Manager.” This system gives those who require assistance from a call center representative the option to either wait on hold for the next available representative or to wait for a call back by the next available representative. This means that less call center representatives are needed. Right?

But who calls the people back?

I suppose that minor detail was overlooked when calculating the number of staff to cut. The automated system still connects a customer with a human representative, trained to assist them in any number of widely varying claims issues and providing information. Okay, so that’s just one minor miscalculation. There is other technology being encouraged by the wise elders administrating the efficiency-enhancing devices being implemented to ease the transition from human to robot. In fact, recent press has encouraged claimants to file their claims for unemployment insurance via the internet. This makes sense. The claim can smoothly pass through the system without a single set of human eyes ever having to scan the claim. Right?

But how about the hundreds of variables that stimulate the need for contact between claimant and specialist to clarify details left out or mistakenly interpreted? Or how about the fact that wages from other states play an enormous legal factor in accurately determining benefit calculations or entitlement in this state? Furthermore, when details like this are overlooked (as they quite often are by the already implemented “internet clean claim system”) this leads to many dollars lost in non-recoverable overpayments.

Well of course there are a few bugs to be worked out and that’s why we hired the experts from private industry to come and evaluate the specific needs of our department and tailor their products to best serve Rhode Island’s jobless needs. These corporations have Rhode Islander’s best interests at heart and the prices paid for their services are well worth the taxpayers dollars.

We have the front desk, where a person can walk in and speak with a representative who is explicitly instructed to have the customer complete a call-back form to be dispersed among the representatives and contact will be made within five business days to aid the individual. In fact, they can do this from an automated, touch-screen kiosk and never have to speak with a live person at all. Despite the fact that this is technically listed as the Unemployment Service Center, it is actually a call center and we do not provide services directly in-person.

But who calls them back?  Or, for that matter, the people who request information about payment via the UIHelp email system?

Well questions like this are simply wrinkles guaranteed to be ironed out after the majority of the representatives are laid off. The fact remains, when a person loses his or her job, he or she wants a human being to explain the rights of legal entitlement. People want to be helped by other people. Automation is excellent at facilitating what human resources can do. But we have all had the frustrating experience of having a complication with an organization, the solution to which is not offered as a numbered choice by the robot voice on the end of the line. When these complications are on the scale of losing one’s home and feeding one’s family, one wants to talk to another human being; a human being trained to explain in detail the when, where and how of the financial lifeline when it is needed most.

You will hear me repeat this many times before my writing days are over: Rhode Island is a reactive state. Not a proactive state. A little foresight goes a long way. Keep the staffing levels as they are and those drowning may stay afloat. Continue on the path of decimating a vital state agency and watch the water levels rise. The choice is up to the legislators and, lest we forget, the legislators answer to the citizens.

But only if the citizens speak up.


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387