Progress Report: Making Sense of CNBC Report, Education Funding in Woonsocket, Hard Knock Life in Middletown


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Mohegan Bluffs, Block Island (Photo by Bob Plain)

Get ready for the conservative barrage that because Rhode Island ranked as the least business-friendly state we should adjust policy to appease the good editors at CNBC. But before we do, take a look at what CNBC says are the top two states in which to business – Texas and Utah – and the bottom two – Rhode Island and Hawaii. Where would you rather move your business to?

By the way, every northeastern state finished in the bottom half of this list. Conversely, Rhode Island was the only northeastern state not to finish in the top 10 for education.

Speaking of public education, RIDE’s own Jason P. Becker has a great post today filling in for Ted Nesi titled: “Woonsocket, not the state, failed to fund city schools.” He writes that because the state has increased education aid to schools there and the city has decreased funding that it’s Woonsocket’s fault it doesn’t have enough money. If only government were so simple … for at least the past three years, Woonsocket has raised property taxes very close to as much as the state allowed, and during that same period Woonsocket lost out on some $12 million it expected in state aid. I would argue the question is not did the state do more than Woonsocket, the question is did either do enough.

The Projo’s story on a Middletown group home with more than 400 at-risk kids living there that was closed due to conditions the state felt were “not suitable for the children” reads like something out of Dickens, or Annie.

Maryellen Butke’s campaign for state senator has a new advocate: Donna Perry, who is both the executive director of the Rhode Island Statewide Coalition and John DePetro’s sister. I bet she won’t be bragging about that endosement as she door knocks on the East Side.

Nice to see an op/ed by CD-2 congressional candidate Abel Collins on the Journal editorial page today. Some inspiring words: “The biggest obstacle to change is not money, it is cynicism. Did we really fight for nearly two centuries to get access to the ballot box for all just to decide now that voting doesn’t accomplish anything? How would Martin Luther King Jr., Susan B. Anthony, or Thomas Dorr judge the lack of political participation that has come to characterize the U.S.?”

Awesome headline of the day: “House Republicans Spend 89 Hours Trying To Take Away Health Coverage From 30 Million Americans”

CNBC might not like Rhode Island, but Gold Digest does!

Who Does Gemma Support?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Anthony Gemma

Anthony GemmaIt’s getting harder all the time to believe that Anthony Gemma is truly a Democrat. It just often seems more likely that his campaign is all some big elaborate hoax. Or, perhaps, Gemma is demonstrating his true political acumen.

Either way, Buddy Cianci had him so tied up in knots the other day that the only member of Rhode Island’s congressional delegation that he said he would vote for this November would be himself and Jack Reed. Neither of whom will be on the ballot.

When Buddy asked if he would support any of the other Rhode Island Democrats running for Congress he tried to dodge the question. “I’d have to look at the person,” Gemma said. Now I don’t expect outsiders to be national security experts before they get to office, but you’d think by the time he declared that he was running for congress as a Democrat that he would know enough about the other Democratic legislators from his state to know whether he would vote for them or not.

Then Buddy asked him specifically about Sheldon Whitehouse.

“I’m going to be honest with you,” Gemma said to Cianci. “I’m frustrated that he has not stepped up and done what is right for me.”

Points for honesty, Anthony, but I won’t be voting for anyone who so brazenly puts his own interest first. Vote your conscience, not for a quid pro quo.

Of all the reasons not to vote for Anthony Gemma, one of the most politic that can be cited is that no one knows how he would vote for anything. Now we don’t even know if he is supporting the other incumbent members of the party he purports to be a member of – though I have my doubts.

Cianci seemed to as well.

“You’re a Democrat,” Buddy said. “Or at least you say you are.”

Why In-House Custodians Matter to Residents


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

It’s a growing trend among the anti-organized labor movement and those who worship at the church of small government: fire public school custodians and outsource their jobs to Corporate America. North Kingstown is the latest town to consider this very draconian move but other local municipalities have as well, such as East Greenwich and Portsmouth – both of whom abandoned the effort after community concerns over class warfare.

To those who support such public sector outsourcing, it is a very black and white issue. Governments, they say, are in the business of providing services not jobs and if and when money can be saved for the taxpayer, it should be.

But detractors often see a more nuanced situation, or more complex economic ramifications.

First, the savings aren’t worth the costs. In East Greenwich, for example, firing the custodians would have saved the average property taxpayer about $13 a year. Because NK has not yet agreed to terms with the private company, any savings are still unknown. But compare that to the $11,000 a year pay cut Tom Keenan will take if the School Committee outsources his job. While the deal isn’t done in NK, he is already employed by the private company at a $5 an hour pay cut.

It begs the question: how many taxpayer dollars equal one person’s financial security? The answer, at the very least, is that, morally, we should all be willing to cough up the price of a pizza a year to keep our neighbor solvent. But forget about doing what’s right for a moment, even from an economic perspective the juice just isn’t worth the squeeze.

Secondly, the savings aren’t even real. I don’t know much about GSA, the Tennessee-based company North Kingstown is considering doing business with, but I promise you they are not in business to save taxpayers money. Any school committee that thinks it is going to be easier to negotiate a contract with a faceless big national corporation than with organized janitors is fooling itself. The only difference is the taxpayer dollars will be going to rich people in Tennessee rather than working class people in North Kingstown, where more than half of the school custodians live in town. Any savings that are realized will come directly from the pockets of the 26 custodians.

Those are the economic arguments against outsourcing the daily cleaning and conditioning of our schools. The social arguments against this type of outsourcing are a little harder to quantify. One involves the safety of the students, and there are multiple media accounts of GSA employing sex offenders. (See here, here and here.) This alone should be of great concern to North Kingstown residents.

Then, there are the intangibles. Custodians happy with their jobs will be more likely to look through a dumpster for your kids expensive retainer, and will probably do a better job of cleaning the toilet your kid sits on.

Custodians can also be the most important role model one can have in school. Or at least one was for me.

When I was in elementary school I had a little more energy than some of the other students and every once in a while it landed me in a bit of trouble. One time I brought an Eddie Murphy cassette tape to school and when I brazenly played it at recess (quite possibly my first test of the First Amendment). The school’s legendary principal Jim Foster introduced me to school custodian Bobby Taylor. Well, actually he remanded me to help him clean the school.

It turned into a summer job and Taylor paid me $5 an hour to help him spruce up the school. We became fast friends, and he was one of the first adults I knew personally who worked with his hands for a living – something that can be really inspirational for a hyperactive kid. Taylor, us students assumed, was developmentally disabled; we based this on his severe stutter and the fact that he rode a bike instead of driving a car to work. He may well be somewhat slow in clinical terms, but the Bobby Taylor I knew was every bit as smart as any other adult I happened to know as an 11-year-old in East Greenwich.

I still see Bobby Taylor riding his bike around town, and every time I do I recall that one of the first truly great teachers I ever had wasn’t a teacher at all. He was a school custodian.

Tonight: Rock the Boat with Ocean State Action


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Are you ready for the progressive party of the year? Join the team from Ocean State Action this Friday, July 13th from 6-10pm for our 7th annual Rock the Boat for Justice Party! Back by popular demand we’ll be kicking off the election season at one of our favorite local watering holes, the East Providence Yacht Club (9 Pier Road East Providence) overlooking beautiful Narragansett Bay.

Take a night off from signature collection (they’re due at 4pm anyway), door knocking and letter stuffing to dance the night away while celebrating Rhode Island’s progressive champions of 2012. Honored guests will include Representative Maria Cimini, Senator Josh Miller, Scott Duhamel, and Henry and Carol Shelton.  Expect to find great music, dancing, fantastic hors d’oeuvres by our West End favorite, Julian’s and your favorite progressive activists and local politicos.

Tickets are available for $50 and can be purchased online at www.oceanstateaction.org or at the door the night of the event. (Discounted tickets are available for low  moderate income progressives. Email info@oceanstateaction.org for details.)

Don’t miss a chance to lift a glass for a great cause and gear up to fight for progressive victories at the ballot box this fall!

Progress Report: RI’s Bankruptcy Law Is Anti-Democratic


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Rhode Island’s bankruptcy law for municipalities is fundamentally anti-democratic, argues Carrol Andrew Morse, a conservative and regular Anchor Rising contributor, in an op-ed for WPRI today. “Rhode Island, for centuries a home to a special brand of strong belief in freedom, should be a place that steadfastly refuses to give ideas about undermining democracy any kind of a basic foothold,” he writes. “The governing and governed alike should reject the idea that democratic accountability must be sacrificed to solve problems over money.”

We could not agree more. It’s one of the reasons RI Future was so hard on Bob Flanders, the former Central Falls receiver – he should have been more contrite about the city’s unfortunate position; instead he joked about his power. It’s also why we took Woonsocket Reps. Jon Brien, Lisa Baldelli-Hunt and Bob Phillips to task when they pushed for a receiver – because they moved to strip their residents of their democratic rights to keep their taxes low.

Speaking of municipal bankruptcy, San Bernadino became the third California city in two weeks to seek financial help from the courts.

Rhode Island public sector retirees protested outside a DC fundraiser for Gina Raimondo yesterday … no surprise there. What I’d like to know is who was inside the Washington DC fundraiser for the smallest state’s general treasurer.

Great Mitt Romney jokes by Bob Kerr in today’s Projo: “Which brings us to Mitt Romney, who keeps his money and his sense of humor in places that are hard to find.” And: “To call Romney stiff as a board is an insult to lumber.”

Froma Harrop also pens an interesting piece, calling out conservatives for enjoying big government on vacation but not at the workplace. “Why do conservatives from elsewhere hang out in places that tax and regulate and do all kinds of other mean things to rich people like themselves? The reason is that these are nice places, and they are that way precisely because they tax and regulate. And these guys know it. If cooler summers were all they craved, they’d be partying in Upper Wisconsin.”

The Obama Administration on voter ID laws: “We call this a poll tax,” said Attorney General Eric Holder.

Looking for a fun and socially enlightening summertime activity? The class warfare comedic classic “9 to 5” opens at Theatre-by-the-Sea on July 18. For another all-time classic comedy on class warfare, try Caddyshack.

NK School Custodians Fight to Save Their Jobs


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

NORTH KINGSTOWN — Custodians, teachers and other union members from around Rhode Island rallied at the school department here in an attempt to save the jobs of the school custodians whose jobs are in imminent danger of being outsourced to a private company from Tennessee.

The custodians and their union representatives say they have met the terms the School Committee had insisted upon for a new contract, but – for reasons that aren’t entirely clear – the committee still voted to do business with GCA, the private custodial company that works primarily in the south and has been controversial in almost every community it has entered.

Because the School Committee still has not signed a contract with GCA, the custodians are still fighting to preserve their jobs.

CVS Drops Out of ALEC


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

CVS, Rhode Island’s biggest local corporation, has dropped its membership with American Legislative Exchange Council, the controversial “right wing bill mill.”

The Woonsocket-based company put out this statement today: “Over the last few weeks, we have closely followed the issues surrounding the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) and have heard from numerous stakeholders expressing their views. As a result, after careful consideration of the available information, CVS Caremark has discontinued its membership in ALEC.

Company spokesman Michael DeAngelis declined to make further comment. Jon Brien, a conservative state Rep. from Woonsocket who is on ALEC’s board of directors, could not be immediately reached for comment (but we’ll update this story when we hear from him).

With CVS’s departure from ALEC, that leaves only one Rhode Island company as a member of the once-clandestine group that pairs legislators with corporate interests to draft model legislation for use at State Houses around the country. According to the website ALEC Exposed, GTech is still an ALEC member. GTech officials could not be immediately reached for comment.

The John Deere tractor company, MillerCoors, BestBuy, Hewlett-Packard also dropped out of ALEC today.

The Media-Audience Feedback Loop


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

A couple weeks ago, I said that the media rewards personal attacks with coverage. Ted Nesi, of WPRI fame, responded with a quick tweet that there’s an audience that rewards personal attacks. Essentially, the media picks up personal political attacks because it knows that those attacks bring in eyeballs, which means ad revenue. This is actually one of my favorite sort of chicken-or-the-egg conundrums; who’s more responsible for where the media goes? The producer of media, or the consumer of media?

I’m going to shift away from politics to explain this, and that’s where this gets not safe for work. Because I’m going to talk about porn. So if you don’t like veiled references to pornography and pornographic acts, I suggest you don’t read this.

Also, a second disclaimer, I’m a feminist, so that’s how I approach this. I’m a male feminist, so I’m complicated, but at the end of the day, I believe men and women should be equal, and that makes me a feminist.

Alright, so, porn. Porn is a smorgasbord of depravity. In fact, statistically, a whopping proportion of people reading this blog probably know what porn’s like. Two out of every five Internet users in the United States; 125 million people, . A third of those people are women. And yet, porn is overwhelmingly misogynist. Why? Well, that’s up for debate.

See, the reason that porn producers use to justify why they shoot rough scenes is that that’s what people buy. But the consumer retaliation is that the producers are the ones making this stuff to the exclusion of other products. I’d argue that added to all this is the versatility of the American consumer to self-date with the aid of a wide variety of what’s available. But that versatility doesn’t aid one side or the other in their arguments.

So what are we to assume? That the vast majority of American males who consume porn are into some depraved stuff (in which case, congratulations ladies); or that there is a highly profitable industry that isn’t exactly meeting the wants of its consumers (though it should be noted those profits are shrinking)?

What I believe we have is what I like to call a media-audience feedback loop. Essentially, at some point, the ball got rolling, and now the audience and the media point their fingers at one another trying to decide who’s responsible for this state of affairs. It effects every aspect of media; from the focus on negative, fear-based news to the “reality” shows in prime time.

That said, I’m going to lay the blame for not getting out of the loop on media’s doorstep. It’s a lot harder for consumers to stop consuming than it is for producers to stop producing. People consume media like addicts. Looking at this through that paradigm, you read RI Future because we give you a different high than, say, the Providence Journal. But before RI Future came along, you lived and got by, getting your fix somewhere else. Before Twitter existed, people read like, a thousand, five thousand, maybe even a hundred thousand character-long posts or articles. We did alright.

We’d be just as well off if media shifted its focus off horse race journalism (which shifted from taking up 45% of news coverage to taking up over 80% of news coverage in 30 years). When we’re focused on policy and leadership, we’re less focused on the “well, how is candidate A going to clobber candidate B?” question. It also means that when we talk about political campaigns being a debate, they’ll actually be debates when media covers them as such. Should we ultimately care how much Congressman David Cicilline has compared to Brendan Doherty? Not particularly, because unless I’m working for them, the hundreds of thousands of dollars they’ve raised won’t make much impact on my day.

What will affect us, as Rhode Islanders, is their policies and their leadership. If you’re a progressive, Mr. Cicilline without a doubt aligns more on your values than Mr. Doherty. In the Democratic primary, you know that Mr. Cicilline has a better style of leadership than Anthony Gemma. Mr. Gemma has been ungracious when taking defeats like that he suffered at the Democratic State Convention.

The same applies elsewhere. Think Senator Sheldon Whitehouse vs. Barry Hinckley or the CD-2 race. They haven’t gotten much play because media isn’t evaluating the candidates based on their policies. The horse race factor says that Mr. Whitehouse and Jim Langevin are shoe-ins. You might argue that media has dismissed the non-incumbents as having poor leadership and unpopular policies. But I think you’d be hard-pressed to find any media coverage that’s really focused squarely on their policies alone. This being my first election cycle as a commentator, maybe the policy stuff happens around the debates and I’m just whining about the early coverage.

Anyhow, yes, there is a media-audience feedback loop. And both consumers and producers are responsible for it. But producers are responsible for letting us get off.

Progress Report: Custodial Politics in NK, Cicilline Raises More Money, Voter ID Laws Hurt More than They Help


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Nothing riles up the suburbs quite like when local leaders threaten to outsource the janitorial staff at the schools, and such seems the case in North Kingstown where 26 custodians are in danger of losing their jobs to privatization. Don’t believe me? Just check out the comments on North Kingstown Patch this morning: one side claims the unions have finally gotten their just desserts, while the other pleads for the working class people whose lives could be forever affected.

But there is more than just an emotional argument to be made for the custodians – and keeping their jobs in-house has an economic benefit, as well. Privatization rarely proves cheaper in the long run, even though the companies that compete in this market often offer sweetheart deals in the first few contracts … but if school committee members don’t like negotiating with organized labor, wait ’till they have to sit across the table from a big, out-of-state corporation that has no interest in North Kingstown other than how much money it can extract from the community. The School Committee would be wise to give this idea a second thought … perhaps the rally tonight at 6pm outside the district headquarters will give them reason to.

Congressman David Cicilline is raising more money than his Republican challenger, reports Ted Nesi … but Brendan Doherty could likely get enough SuperPAC money to offset Cicilline’s advantage on the ground. This isn’t all bad news for ex-mayor … whatever misgivings Rhode Islanders have about how Cicilline left Providence could easily be usurped by our disdain of seeing Corporate America try to influence the outcome of a local race.

Maryellen Butke is stepping down from her position with RI-CAN, a group that uses corporate money to lobby for more charter schools in Rhode Island.

According to an Associated Press study of voter ID laws in Indiana and Georgia, the controversial law may well suppress more votes than they protect. “The numbers suggest that the legitimate votes rejected by the laws are far more numerous than are the cases of fraud that advocates of the rules say they are trying to prevent. Thousands more votes could be in jeopardy for this November, when more states with larger populations are looking to have similar rules in place.”

 

Local Author Looks at Quahogging Industry


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Ray Huling, the author of “Harvesting the Bay: Fathers, Sons and the Last of the Wild Shellfishermen”

Maine has the lobster and Maryland the crab. Vermont has maple syrup, Wisconsin has cheese, Texas has the t-bone steak and California has its produce. Rhode Island, of course, has its own staple food: the quahog.

As iconic as our state clam is, though, many know little about the men who harvest them. Few, on the other hand, know these aquatic hunter-gathers better than Ray Huling, a 12th generation Rhode Islander whose new book “Harvesting the Bay: Fathers, Sons and the Last of the Wild Shellfishermen” tells the story of how, and why, his family worked the waters of Greenwich Bay.

“American food production has gone crazy over the past couple of centuries,” Huling writes, setting the scene that something has gone awry with our way of feeding ourselves. “A succession of technological and sociological changes has all but done away with the family farm and the small fishing operation. The industrialization and the capitalization of agriculture turned food wealth into capital and used that capital to further industrialize food. Americans replaced the food calories that powered human labor with coal and oil calories that powered machines.”

But the son and grandson of a bullraker, the local term for the shellfishermen who literally rake clams up off the bottom of the Bay, sees a better model in his familial trade.

“The bullraker connects our forebears with us, and he may yet connect us to our descendants,” he writes. “He may prove himself not an anachronism, but a precognition, a vision of the future. The bullraker may persist through time because he works sustainably.”

Huling’s book is a celebration of the shellfisherman: of how they work with the state to transplant quahogs around the Bay to ensure they are both healthy and plentiful; of how they work tirelessly through the cold winter – sometimes even having to resort to cutting holes in the ice to catch their prey; of their love of the water.

But, at the same time, he pulls no punches on the culture. He writes about the pirated catches from closed waters, selling illegally directly to customers and ripping off the dealers who control the markets. He also takes on the vulnerabilities and strengths of the quahogger.

“Most bullrakers deal with both inferiority and superiority complexes,” Huling writes. “They often feel as though they could not have held any other job, as if they have failed in life by resorting to quahogging. Conversely, they know they work harder than just about anyone they know, and that their profession has an immediately recognizable social purpose. They bring home meat – just the thing that brought God Almighty to favor Abel over Cain.”

Huling will be reading from his book tonight at 5:30 at the Brown Bookstore, and on Saturday at 4pm at Books of the Square.

Tuesday Rally to Support NK School Custodians


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Flyer courtesy of the Ecumenical Students for a Living Wage.

A rally in support of the North Kingstown custodians has been scheduled for Tuesday, July 10 at 6 p.m. at the North Kingstown School Administration Building, 100 Fairway, Drive North Kingstown. 

GCA Services, is the national privately owned company from Knoxville, Tennessee.  The North Kingston School Committee voted privatize custodial services and turn over operations to GCA.  Who are they? Writing about the situation on Change.Org,  Local Union President Sandie Blankenship tells us:

My co-workers and I made $1.3 million in concessions to the district. And when the committee sought an additional $400,000, we all pitched in, took a big hit, and came up with the money the committee sought.

So if it is not about money, what is it about? It is about power and the capacity of the powerful to limit workers from having any say about their working conditions. It’s about silencing our voices.

But we will not be silenced.

GCA will slash wages and other benefits. However, most devastating to our members is the loss of traditional health insurance which GCA will replace with a limited benefit plan.

The difference between what we all think of as insurance (Blue Cross, United Healthcare, etc.) and limited benefit plans? With typical insurance coverage – the sort we are all used to – our costs were covered once we paid our deductible. So if someone’s child had to go to the hospital, the family could focus on treatment and care and not costs. If the bill reached $5000, those costs were covered once we paid our deductible.

That’s not so with a limited benefit plan. GCA’s coverage (provided by Symetra, a life insurance company, not a health insurance company) will pay a flat $500. The rest is on the family.

That’s a short road to poverty.

We also have serious concerns about the company the five committee members plan to hire: GCA Services. Their record troubles us. Independent news services – found with a quick Google search – have documented the serious problems with GCA, including hiring and placing a registered sex offender in a Texas middle school despite GCA’s screening efforts.
GCA Services profits by cutting wages, cutting benefits, and cutting corners.

In a recent (December 16, 2011, cases 28-CA-23513 and 28-CA-62481) decision from the NLRB and gives you a good indication how GCA treats its employees. The National Labor Relations Board ordered* GCA Services to “cease and desist” enforcing its rule (contained in GCA’s employee handbook) that prohibited GCA employees from encouraging or soliciting “membership in…organizations (meaning Unions) on work time or in work areas.”

GCA was ordered to

• Stop interrogating employees about Union membership;
• Stop interrogating employees about Union activities;
• Stop enforcing rules that prohibited employees from speaking about the Union;
• Stop engaging in surveillance of its employees to discover their Union activities;
• Stop threatening employees that it will not discuss with or grant its employees pay raises or improved benefits until they cease support for the Union;
• Stop threatening employees by inviting them to quit their employment because of their Union activities;
• Stop maintaining a rule that prohibited employees from discussing their wages with fellow employees;
• Stop threatening its employees with transfers to isolate employees from fellow employees for the purpose of interfering with their Union activities;
• Stop maintaining a rule requiring employees to surrender their personal phones to GCA so that GCA could discover and ascertain with whom its employees speak and text; and,
• Stop discharging employees in order to discourage membership in the Union.

You can do two things to help the North Kingstown Custodians:

1. Sign the Change.Org petition to send message that races to the bottom strategies don’t help Rhode Island;

2. Come to the Rally to show your support for the workers Tuesday night.

Progress Report: RI Takes Lead on Homelessness, Paper vs. Plastic Bags, the ‘Income Mendoza Line’


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

How is Rhode Island viewed by others? Lately, like a state that takes care of its least fortunate residents – which is something we should be proud of and other states should mimic. This Al Jazeera video is a few days old now, but it focuses on RI’s first-in-the-nation Homeless Bill of Rights, and how it will help the plight of the homeless … it was sent to me by a friend in Oregon, where his City Council just passed a law that will effectively ban some homeless people from the downtown there. Thanks to all the Rhode Islanders who have helped our state buck the national trend and instead move towards more humane treatment of homeless, instead of criminalizing it.

Congrats to Barrington, which has reinvigorated the debate about paper vs. plastic bags at the grocery store. My solution: instead of banning plastic bags, stores should charge for them and include in that cost the price they exact on the environment.

Congrats also to South Kingstown state Rep. Teresa Tanzi, who GoLocal names as its power player of the week today … Tanzi is a promising progressive legislator who just finished her freshman term at the State House.

Turns out the “comfortable standard” of income in the United States is around $75,000, according to an article in the New York Times.  I likened this to the “income Mendoza Line” and a few right wing pundits quickly jumped down my throat … I’m guessing they don’t understand what the Mendoza Line refers to…

Texas, not surprisingly, has taken the concept of the voter ID law from simply disenfranchising to completely ridiculous – gun licenses are an acceptable form of identification while student ID’s and social security cards are not…

Welcome to Rhode Island, Kristen Gourlay … she’s RIPR’s new health care reporter.

Whither the Clamcake?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Statue of a bullraker at Warwick Public Library. (Photo by Ray Huling)

Earlier this summer, the Warwick Public Library held its first annual Quahoggers Jamboree, a celebration of the quahaugging industry that included displays of quahaugs and quahaugging equipment manned by real live quahauggers, an installation on the history of quahaugging in Rhode Island put together by the Warwick Historical Society, and a performance by The Aristocats, a swing band. It was an unusual event.

The Library boasts a somewhat well-known statue of a bullraker, and the Jamboree served as a way to re-dedicate this monument, as well as to re-introduce Warwickians to the quahauggers in their midst. Lincoln Chafee put up the statue in 1998, during his tenure as Mayor of Warwick, but the installation never had any signage to identify the title of the work, the artist or its purpose until now. Thus, the Jamboree had dual purposes, which brought out the Governor, along with a few quahauggers. And if the Governor was showing up, the current Mayor had to come out, too. The quahaugger, the Governor, the Mayor, and the librarian–the greatest Peter Greenaway film never made and a fine way to pass an evening in June.

All of this made for something of a big deal for quahaugging, and for me. I took great interest in the Jamboree, because it directly contradicted a point I make in my new book, Harvesting the Bay, which gives an account of Rhode Island’s shellfishing industry as sustainable food production from the perspective of a son and grandson of bullrakers. I argue that any sustainable food system is going to be something very much like quahaugging in Narragansett Bay and that people who produce food sustainably are going to be very much like quahauggers–of whom I give a detailed and intimate portrait. Naturally, I offer strong opinions in the book–what other kind are there, when it comes to food in general and quahaugs in particular?–and the Quahoggers Jamboree busted me on one of them.

I’m not a big fan of the statue. Nor of memorials to the industry in general. The Chafees aligned two goals when they advocated for and sponsored the installation: 1) put up a monument emblematic of Warwick; 2) put up a monument in memoriam of Stephanie Chafee’s father, who was a proponent of public art. Quahaugging seemed emblematic of Warwick, and, in spirit and by word of mouth, if not in signage, the work was dedicated to Murray Danforth.

That’s all fine, but doesn’t do all that much for the shellfishery. I see works like this as a way to memorialize a dying trade, rather than support a living one. With a statue or a park, you can admire an object, rather than deal with the person or activity it represents.  Statues connote something gone. Denotes something gone, in the case of Danforth. And for 14 years, from the first dedication of the bullraker statue to the installation of plaques explaining who made it and why just  two weeks before the release of my book, that was just how things worked down at the Library. What timing.

But it’s a real treat to undermine myself with some reporting for RI Future, because of my friendship with Bob and because it’s always fun to write for a publication that falls to one’s right on the political spectrum. Here follows a brief tour of the Quahauggers Jamboree.

Jody King’s boat Black Gold (Photo by Ray Huling)

It started with a boat in the parking lot. Black Gold, Jody King’s boat. Jody’s bullraked for over twenty years now; he’s a big ambassador for the industry and one of the very few black men who work in quahaugs. The Black Gold–named for the monetization of quahaugs through bullraking–is rather large and elabourate for a quahaug skiff: twenty-five feet, a couple of sails, a big console and cabin. It made a good impression, taking up four parking spaces in front of the library. Jody features prominently in one chapter of  my book, and this display was just his style. It also served to announce in a full and unmistakable way that, indeed, quahauggers were on the premises. Perhaps several of them.

Is that why there were cops all over the joint? The Warwick police had really turned out for this one. Five of them? Six? Perhaps they had come to ensure the safety of the Governor and the Mayor, rather than to keep the quahauggers in line. A few cops kept watch over the parking lot from a vantage point just above Jody’s boat. Nearby, anenst the entrance to the Library, stood a couple of food stands, which the police also kept an eye on.

Not really the traditional cuisine of quahaugers. (Photo by Ray Huling)

Poppy’s Gourmet Kettle Korn. Lemon Shake Ups. An ice cream cart. Popcorn and lemonade and ice cream made sense, because the late June heat wave remained in effect and there would be a concert on the lawn later, but the refreshments on offer also brought to mind the thought that something was missing, some special food that would have harmonized well with the theme of the event. I pondered this lack as I looked around.

Across from the thought-provoking food carts, a crowd of people had begun to fill a crescent of folding chairs on the well-shaded lawn, facing a small temporary stage set up just in front of the Library’s West wall. They were settling in pretty good numbers, a few dozen or so at that time and more to come, with an average age of about a hundred. I decided to head inside and check out the quahaugging displays, before taking a look at the garden and statue, which lay down a small paved path.

Just inside the doors stood a couple of pillars pasted with information about and images of the history of shellfishing in Rhode Island, from the Narragansetts to the bullrakers, put together by Felicia Gardella, President of the Warwick Historical Society. A couple of cops, one short, one average height, inspected the kiosk intensely, the shorter one explaining things to the taller. I meant to eavesdrop on them–imagine if this conversation should lead to a guy quitting policing and taking up quahaugging!–but then Owen Kelly yelled at me before I could hear anything.

Owen’s been a bullraker for about thirty years, and he looks it. He sounds like it, too. “Hey hey, Ray! What’s happenin’ brother?!” he bellowed. Owen’s not too tall, stocky, in his mid-fifties, grey-bearded, tanned, weathered, calloused, bright-eyed, often shabbily-dressed. Everything you could want in a fisherman. He was wearing a name tag, as all the quahauggers present were. Not just a sticker with a scrawl of black magic marker on it, but a printed name tag pinned to his shirt: ‘Owen’. What the hell was going on here?

Owen was holding forth on the public enhancement aquaculture project, a shellfish farming program run by the quahauggers themselves and formally an arrangement among the Rhode Island Shellfsiherman’s Association, Roger Williams University, RI DEM, the Department of Health, and who knows how many other organizations and institutions. The project consists of a few quahog cultivation platforms–upwellers–floating in Warwick Cove, relying on dockspace donated by Jack Brewer of Greenwich Bay Marina. The quahauggers take seed quahaugs, so tiny that thousands of them together look like a clump of oatmeal, and grow them in the upwellers to field plant size, about as big as a fingernail. Then they sow them, a few million each year, into the Bay.

Some artifacts of the quahaugging industry. (Photo by Ray Huling)

Virtually all quahaugging in Narragansett Bay is wild harvest, and this is rare in modern America. Most quahaugs in the U.S. now come from aquaculture, especially down South. But Rhode Island’s quahauggers have strongly resisted the privatization of the Bay that large-scale quahaug farming would require. Thus, their aquaculture project produces quahaugs that become available to the public, at large for anyone to catch. There’s no guarantee that the quahauggers who volunteer to cultivate the clams will ever see a return on their investment, which is just how they like it.

They want to expand the project, too, and, so, at the Jamboree, they had a computer set up–an ancient Dell laptop that kept freezing–to play a video they’d made to promote public enhancement aquaculture.

“This is why we started this project right here,” explained Owen to a librarian. “So we can produce clams and put’em out for the general public.” He pointed to a frozen image of the upwellers in operation. “Somebody outta Woonsocket comes down, you can go’n’get clams…we approached the Mayor to see if we could do it down Oaklan’ Beach–this is a public enhancement project–but there’s no money out there…right now, over in Washington State or Oregon, they have this huge public enhancement program that they’ve done…and the dollars that come back to the State is incredible…Now, if the State of Rhode Island or the mayor looked at that and said, ‘wait a minit, we could do that here’…” Owen stopped and spread his hands wide in the universal gesture for ‘fucken a’.

But the State and the cities have already blown their money on other things, I pointed out, which wound Owen up a bit. “Yeah!” he cried. “I mean look at Schilling! C’m’on! C’m’on! I could put hundreds and hundreds o’people t’work! Oh my God!”

After a short rant, Owen turned back to the task of finding someone to unstick the computer. I looked over the rest of the quahuagging stuff. There were a couple of display tables: bullrakes, stale handles, clam rakes, photos, framed articles from the paper, a map of the Bay, and even a culling rack with a pile of honest-to-goodness quahaugs on it. Jody King was tending to them, perhaps partly because he had caught them, as the tag in the rack attested, but mostly so he could explain what they actually were to interested patrons of the Jamboree.

“Now, is that a littleneck?” asked one such person. Jody dug his hands into the quahuags and grabbed up a few small ones. Quahauggers handle their catch in a practised way. You can see them evaluating each quahaug, often unconsciously, measuring it with their hands. It’s like watching an old seamstress touch a swatch of fabric.

“Yup,” said Jody. “These are all littlenecks…that’s a topneck,” he said, holding up a slightly larger quahaug. “And the next one up is called a top…that’s a cherry…and a hog.” He held up the largest quahaug of the bunch. “For chowders.” Speaking of chowder, why isn’t there any?

He paused, pensively. “They should have a big pot of chowder here and serve little tiny cups, dixie cups, three ounce…that’s a good way of doin’ it…pass ’em around, if you don’t like it, you don’t have to take it off the tray…my wife’s allergic…she’s allergic to all shellfish…how hard is that?!”

Jody stood across from the side door that leads out to the statue. “It’s good they’re finally doin’ somethin’ with it…Owen and I were here when they dedicated it, the first time.’ We went outside to take a look at the statue as the sun set.

‘The Warwick Quahogger, A Day’s Catch’, ‘In Loving Memory of Murray S. Danforth, Jr.’ Read the new plaques. The statue consists of a shellfisherman holding a bullrake in one hand and a bag of quahaugs in the other; beside him sit another bag of quahaugs and a dog wearing a neckerchief; they’re all in a row, on a platform overlooking the shallow pool of a fountain.

“The guy who’s standin’ there’s a plumber,” said Jody, who has a pleasant, stream-of-consciousness conversational style. “The guy who posed for it was a plumber from East Greenwich…but it actually looks like…you’ll know the family…if you look at it from the side…there’s a whole quahauggin’ family…” The Bennetts? No. The Coles? No. The Rayhills? “That’s it! The Rayhills! That’s who it looks like.” Those names are among the most well-known in Rhode Island quahaugging, some of the best quahauggers ever on the Bay, with some of the wildest stories. And that’s what they get: a Rayhill face on the body of a plumber dressed up to look like a quahaugger. “I’m glad they’re finally doin’ somethin’ with it,” said Jody. A few minutes later, the Governor and the Mayor showed up.

Diane Greenwald, the Library’s Director, introduced these other, more conventional dignitaries from the stage set up for the swing band, and, as she did so, she made use of one of the rarest pronunciations of the word ‘quahaug’. “Our event tonight was inspired by our beautiful sculpture of a kwoehoegger,” she said. Fantastic. Usually, one hears either the mostly correct and true ‘kwawhawg’ pronunciation or the mostly false and corrupt and heavily propagandized Massachusetts ‘koehawg’. In Warwick (correct pronunciation ‘warrik’), you can find both ‘kawhawg’ and Director Greenwald’s lovely ‘kwoehoeg’. It was a good moment.

She handed the microphone over to Mayor Avedisian. The Mayor–beefy, energetic, and stuffed into a dark, rumpled suit–thanked Stephanie Chafee for having personally funded the statue and Governor Chaffee for having been a good Mayor of Warwick in his own right. He then explained why quahaugging is so important to the city: “The land that we live on right now, what was originally called Shawhomett, was purchased nearly four hundred years ago with wampum cut from shells of quahaugs”

Which is something of a bizarre point. Quahauggers don’t trade in wampum (more properly, for the purple stuff, ‘suckauhock’), nor does the word ‘purchase’ accurately describe the agreement the Narragansetts made with Samuel Gorton in 1642. The Mayor did mention that Warwick residents do pursue quahuagging as a commercial endeavor aimed at supplying food to people to this very day, but then advanced another strange argument about the prominence of quahaugs in Warwick: “Most everyone who is present here had clamcakes and chowder at Rocky Point at some time.”

Well, that’s true, but only because most everyone present had been born in the late 19th century. The Rocky Point he’s talking about doesn’t exist anymore. The quahaugging particulars the Mayor offered had dust on them. He said nothing special about the trade in quahaugs going on today, about people eating quahaugs now, or even about the unique aquaculture project going on just a couple of miles away under the care of quahauggers almost exclusively from Warwick. His comments lacked precisely the same thing the food offerings did.

Then Governor Chafee took the stage. Slim, wispy, kind of spaced out, dressed in light, office-casual shirt and slacks, the Governor said a few words on how great libraries are, especially the ones in Warwick, and then remarked how tall the trees had gotten since they first installed the statue all those years ago.

Everything in Rhode Island is so fucking strange. Yet, amidst the strangeness, there is always a reasonable voice. The Mayor split. The Governor milled around for a while. The Aristocats–all of whom looked a touch older than the oldest person in the crowd–began to set up their instruments. As I headed back toward the parking lot, I heard one old-timer moan, “How come they don’t have any clamcakes?…they oughtta have clamcakes.” That’s exactly right, but it’s not the easiest thing to do, even in the Ocean State, the last great bastion of wild quahaugging.

“We looked into it,” said Wil Gregersen, the Community Services Librarian, a quite tall, quite thin, reddishly-bearded guy, who arrived from Wisconsin about a year and a half ago. As the librarians started to put together their event, they considered offering some quahaug foodstuffs as part of the Jamboree, but the task proved more difficult than one would expect. “I could not figure out how to do it locally,” said Wil. “The concessions, the band, they’re completely a Warwick thing, and I was trying to figure out who in Warwick serves koehaugs and might be able to come, but the places I contacted don’t travel.”

It’s not his fault, even if he is from Wisconsin. Of course serving clamcakes and chowder is the right thing to do, and, of course, the even better thing to do would be to serve quahaugs caught by the quahauggers working the event. A statue is not the best medium for the aesthetic appreciation of the quahaugger. The clambake is. A feast of quahaugs–that’s the way to celebrate the quahauggers among you.

But it’s illegal for individuals to buy and sell quahaugs to each other. A quahaugger cannot legally sell his catch to his neighbour. A quahaugger can sell only to a shellfish dealer, only a dealer can sell to the public, and to be a dealer one must have premises, one must undergo inspections of said premises, one must have insurance, and so on. Much of these restrictions are necessary in order to have a functioning interstate market in quahaugs, but the system makes things difficult for those who want simply to have a big clambake in Rhode Island.

There are workarounds. Each year, at the Charlestown Seafood Festival, the Shellfisherman’s Association runs a raw bar that dishes up quahaugs, oysters, and steamers to an adoring public. Real live quahauggers shuck and serve the shellfish, which they sell to support the Association. Technically, everything runs through a shellfish dealer, Twin Shellfish, out of Warwick.

You can’t expect librarians to know this or, even if they do know it, to be able to organize a locally-sourced, quahaugger-supplied clambake. Especially if the librarians are not native Rhode Islanders. And I do mean ‘librarians’, plural, here.

Both Wil and Director Greenwald each emphasized the others role in putting together the Jamboree. Wil put together the Jamboree “almost single-handedly” said Greenwald during her brief speech. “It was actually Diane, the Library Director, who had the idea,” said Wil. “She lives in Warwick, she watches the koehauggers from where she lives, she sees them out on the Bay, she sees the boats…so she suggested we should see if we could find some local fishermen.” Diane is from Florida.

The Bullraker (Photo by Ray Huling)

Maybe I wasn’t so wrong in the book when I said that Rhode Islanders often would rather deal with a statue of a bullraker than with bullrakers themselves. But, really, it’s a matter of how Rhode Islanders use their government and their wealth to celebrate the things that draw them together, that establish them as Rhode Islanders. Then-Mayor Chafee wanted to put up a statue; Murray Danforth liked public art; Stephanie Chafee wanted to memorialize her father, she has sixty million bucks, and her husband was the Mayor. That statue was going to happen. But it’s not as if people have money and power for no reason at all. Rhode Islanders gave them that money and power, which is an endorsement of whatever is done with them. The statue really does represent what Rhode Islanders want to do about quahaugging, just as the difficulty of sourcing local quahaugs does.

Yet, there are many strains of thought about quahaugging in the minds of the people who live around Narragansett Bay, and other ideas may take hold in practice. Just as Wil explained why there was no chowder or clamcakes at the Quahoggers Jamboree–and I mean right at that moment; again, incredible timing–a guy came up to him and said, “I see these kwawhawgs in there and they make me hungry!”

“I’m very sorry!” exclaimed Wil. No need to be sorry: the Quahoggers Jamboree was exactly the right thing to do. Making that guy want to eat sweet, succulent, locally-sourced, dug-that-day quahaugs is exactly the right thing. That guy has control over his community’s relationship to its most famous natural resource. Everybody in Rhode Island does. Now, it’s just a matter of figuring out what we really want to do with the quahaug.

Cronyism Is Everywhere


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Whenever I talk about Rhode Island and corruption, invariably, someone always argues against the facts (which are that Rhode Island isn’t particularly corrupt, in comparison with other states). I’ve already covered the fact that in every ranking of state corruption, Rhode Island never places particularly high. So let’s address the counter argument, which is always anecdotal.

“What about the ‘I know a guy…’ mentality?” is the usual retort. There’s always an example, and indeed, it’s not hard to find examples. The problem is that the arguer isn’t pointing to corruption, it’s that they’re pointing to cronyism. And cronyism isn’t illegal. Sad but true. So while it may be “corruption,” it’s not corruption that leads to prosecutions.

When we argue against cronyism, what we’re attempting to do is argue for meritocracy. Cronyism, nepotism, patronage, etc., etc., these are all direct threats to meritocracy. But there’s the problem: meritocracy is an incredibly difficult system to put in place.

We don’t always “earn” our jobs via merit. In fact, we rarely do. We get our foot in the door because we knew a guy. Or because we smiled the right way, or someone had a good feeling the right way. Maybe we were first to be interviewed. Maybe we were last. Maybe we arranged our resume in manner that pleased the person who looked them over.

When you start discussing meritocracy, you start asking yourself all sort of hard questions about ability. Do you hire someone who’s nice but not particularly good because you think that they’d get along well with the rest of the office, boosting happiness and productivity? Do you hire the arrogant jerk who’s arrogant precisely because they’re excellent at what they do? Should a person’s messy personal life be included for evaluation when their professional work is spotless?

And that’s just the beginning. Is it any wonder that many employers, and folks in government, rather than evaluate people based on merit choose to go with the people they know? Not at all. Youknow Pete. Pete’s a good guy. Pete was at your wedding. You get along with Pete. You know his work history, you know his abilities. It’s a hell of a lot easier to hire Pete than wade through resumes and interviews (just as an aside, interviews have about the same success as drawing names from a hat of finding the right person for the job).

The great irony in the argument against government cronyism is that those who would espouse that government should be more businesslike would find that cronyism would increase. Most corporations remain a stark feudal construct, completely undemocratic, and at higher levels, often anti-meritocratic. Also ironically, to ensure meritocracy in government, faceless bureaucracy would have to increase, so that candidates could be selected without regard to personal feelings. It’d be a cruel world.

All this isn’t to say that cronyism or corruption shouldn’t be addressed. I hate cronyism. It ruins the idea that you’ve made your own place in the world, it makes you doubt your own victories. But every time we here the phrase “well, you have to network,” what we need to realize is that that’s just code for saying “you have to participate in cronyism.” It’s the way the country has been functioning.

Finally, all Rhode Island governments need to be seen as addressing corruption. That’s something that should be done, regardless of where Rhode Island stands in rankings. The problem is that Rhode Islanders perceive their government as corrupt. And that perception is deadly to trust and faith in government.

Libor Scandal: Big Bank Damaged Trillions in Loans


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Barclays world headquarters in London, UK (via Wikipedia)

Quietly in America, but with a deafening roar of anger in the U.K., the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.K. Financial Services Authority unleashed a record-breaking fine on June 27 of a combined £290 million ($453 million) on Barclays PLC, the world’s fourth-largest bank, as part of a non-prosecution agreement. In exchange for the bank to avoid prosecution over its fraud, it has agreed to help the two governments with their inquiries into other banks. The deal also does not cover current and former employees from facing prosection. The City of Baltimore has already initiated a lawsuit against Barclays and its fellow banks. The US government is expected to investigate a further 16 banks, now assisted by Barclays. Investigations are also taking place around the world in countries such as Canada and Singapore.

Barclays had admitted to manipulating Libor (London Interbank Offered Rate), which is the average cost of borrowing at which Britain’s banks lend each other money. British banks daily submit to a trade association the interest rates they’re borrowing money at, which are then averaged and used worldwide to calculate interest rates on loans. The whole process is overseen by the British Bankers’ Association, a non-profit company made up of the banks themselves, with little regulation.

After the Global Financial Crisis of 2008, Libor became a way of measuring a banks health. But according to an anonymous source inside a different bank, Libor rates were routinely under-reported, in a banking culture that had normalized illegal activity. The account was published in the Telegraph. Emails show the traders responsible for submitting these rates completely manipulating them, with such phrases like “done… for you big boy” tossed in without any regard for posterity.

How does this affect you? Libor is used to calculate the interest rates on loans ranging from mortgages, student loans, small business loans, and insurance; to the tune of $10 trillion of loans. Chances are, you owe payment on one of those loans. The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) estimated that Libor effects futures contracts with a notional $564 trillion value in 2011. The Wall Street Journal believes the total in contracts is $800 trillion.

But former chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission Hervey Pitt has said “this may be the tip of the proverbial iceberg.” Indeed, Barclays’ decision to cooperate with authorities signals that they’re prepared to give up their colleagues to Washington. Swiss banking behemoth UBS has announced it’s approached the Swiss authorities with information regarding rate abuses.

The result of the “global fraud” won’t do any wonders for the banking sector’s reputation around the world. Seen by 72% of Americans as “only car[ing] about making money for itself” according to a Pew Research poll released on June 4th, pluralities of Americans also blame Wall Street bankers for the bad economy; according to an Economist poll.

David Cameron, British PM (via Wikipedia)

Already, British politicians are rounding on the banking sector, with British Prime Minister David Cameron (Conservative Party) telling Parliament that:

“We need to take action right across the board, introducing the toughest and most transparent rules on pay and bonuses of any major financial center in the world, increasing the taxes banks must pay, insuring tough civil and criminal penalties for those who break the law, and above all, clearing up the regulatory failure left by the last Labour government.”

Despite the remarks, Mr. Cameron’s government is being criticized by its Labour Party opponents as attempting to stave off demands for a public inquiry and criminal proceedings by scoring political points by blaming the former Labour government for the deregulation of the banking sector with a parliamentary inquiry.

But though American politicians and media remain largely silent on the scandal, David Meister, the U.S. CFTC’s director of enforcement, told Britain’s Guardian newspaper that the Commission’s investigation was “to protect the markets and public from such illegal conduct… [June 27th’s] action demonstrates that we will bring the full force of our authority to bear as we carry out that mission.”

__________________________________________

This might be the trial that the banks never got, especially if Barclays spills its guts. However, it should be noted that observers like NakedCapitalism.com’s Yves Smith have pointed out that one of the major obstacles to this is that both parties in the United States are beholden to Wall Street. Whether this translates into a full-on crackdown on the rampant illegality in the high-flying financial remains to be seen.

Providence Cross Moved to Private Property


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

A Constitutional and community crisis has been averted as the cross on public property in Providence has been moved to private land. Peter Montequila, owner of Finest Car Wash on Pleasant Valley Parkway who erected the religious symbol on the city-owned road median, moved it Friday morning, his wife Doris said.

The cross, which Montequila put up on an Adopt-a-Spot median he takes care of, is now in front of his nearby gas station and car wash. The cross gained attention when Steve Ahlquist, president of the Humanists of Rhode Island, wrote a letter to Mayor Taveras and then blogged about in on RI Future.

Montequila, who said he put up the cross in part to show solidarity with other religious symbols on public property that have been in the news as of late, could not be reached for comment. His wife said the plan was always to remove the cross from public property after July 4, though Montequila had not said that in any of the interviews he had given.

Providence Mayor Angel Taveras visited the car wash this morning, as the cross was being removed, said Doris Montequila.

David Ortiz, a spokesman for Taveras, said in a statement, “The owner of Finest Car Wash, who has maintained and cared for the median in front of his business for 16 years, agreed to move the memorial off the public median and onto his private property across the street.”

Ortiz said City Solicitor did not feel the cross violated the Constitution. But, he added, “allowing it to remain on city property would require the city to allow other individuals or organizations to adopt spots in the city and erect any symbol or sign.”

“The current Adopt-a-Spot regulations permit applicants to post a sign indicating that they have adopted the spot,” Ortiz said. “The city will update the regulations to specifically provide that no other signs or symbols will be permitted on adopted locations.”

The Montequila’s are giving away t-shirts commemorating the cross to customers who support them, Doris Montequila said.

Stories from Rhode Island’s Unemployment Crisis II

In case you missed my last piece, I’m posting a new series as part of the Where’s the Work? initiative that’s focused on getting past the statistics that dominate coverage of the unemployment crisis and putting our attention back where it needs to be–on the real Rhode Islanders facing real challenges as they try to weather this Great Recession.

Our second story comes from Richard, who lives in the West End neighborhood of Providence.

Richard Herranen has been working in human services for more than 20 years, most recently at the Urban League of Rhode Island, where he did HIV prevention programming. Richard, who has a master’s degree and is credentialed and licensed in substance abuse treatment, loved his job. And he was good at it. But when funding from the Center for Disease Control dried up, he found himself unemployed at the age of 69.

After losing his job, Richard underwent some serious health problems and spent a difficult year recovering. But now he’s healthy again, and has been looking for work for the past thirteen months. He’s applied for every position he could find in his old fields, but so far has had little success. “I’ve had a few interviews,” he says, “but nothing ever materialized. That’s the most frustrating part. You go in for the interview, and then you never hear a word.”

Richard is convinced it’s a question of age. “I’ve gotten roundabout feedback from colleagues. ‘He’s just too old,’ they say. I just turned 71.” But Richard is physically, mentally, and intellectually fit. And he loves working. “I’m not ready to quit working. Even if my wife and I were well enough off that we could afford to retire, I would still want to work. I’m younger than Jerry Brown. I’m about the same age as Bob Dylan and Mick Jagger and Paul McCartney. And they’re all very active and doing well at their respective professions.” He understands that some agencies are reluctant to hire older people because they do not want to invest in training for an employee who might be retiring soon. But Richard already knows the field very well. “The positions I’ve interviewed for, I’d hardly require any training at all.”

Richard has also looked at part-time work. “Even the somewhat lower-paying jobs are attractive,” he says. “I’ve applied to work at Starbucks. Whole Foods. To work on the ferry to Martha’s Vineyard. I even thought about joining the Peace Corps, but I couldn’t leave my wife Barbara and our black lab Sophie.”

For now, Richard is committed to continuing the search. He got his last unemployment check two weeks ago, so he now has no income but Social Security. “We had money invested, but like most people we took a hell of a big hit when the recession started. Still taking a big hit.” He shakes his head. “I never thought it’d be this difficult to find work.”

 

Where’s the Work? is an initiative of the Ocean State Action Fund. You can share your own unemployment story  or ask your elected officials to listen to Rhode Island’s unemployed workers by clicking here.

The False Neutrality of Education Reform


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Maryellen Butke (Photo courtesy of RI-CAN)

Mr. Plain recently received some pushback from commenters about his recent article, Butke’s Campaign Puts Focus on Education ‘Reform’. I’m not going to recount the slightly convoluted backstory (read the above-linked article, the preceding article about Senator Perry’s retirement, and especially Ms. Butke’s post to Mr. Nesi’s blog), but here is the key quote:

My feeling is that Regunberg, Crowley and Bukte somehow need to reconcile their somewhat disparate points if Rhode Island is to holistically improve the education it offers. We need to offer a better education to all students without making life any tougher for our hard-working teachers, who hold one of the most important jobs in our community. That’s the progressive solution to reforming public education.

On its face, there is very little to disagree with. Hell, I support both those things too! Right?

Ehh, no. This quote (which certainly was written without ill-intention) hints at the brilliant and subversive rhetoric that conservative corporate education reform has been pushing for years.  It reinforces false idea that education can be improved while simultaneously devaluing labor. In the quote above for example, “Offering a better education to all students” becomes positioned as the priority for education reform groups like Ms. Butke’s RI-CAN distinct and against the labor movement’s priority of respecting “our hard-working teachers.” Claiming the progressive solution is a compromise between two opposing points reinforces the myth that labor is not focused on providing an excellent education.

I’d strongly argue teachers unions and other labor groups are largely looking out for the students’ best interests, directly or indirectly, but others can engage in that debate. I instead want to direct attention to the false claim that improving education is a pursuit that should be above the fray of politics.

We should all be on the same page by now that we need to do better by our youth. If you disagree, you haven’t been paying attention. But this deliberately inoffensive claim is as about as far as Ms. Butke will go in her public rhetoric—the how is harder to come by. In her response featured on Nesi’s Notes she “welcomes debate on the how” but offers no answers. However she does claim no less than 6 times that reforming public education means setting aside politics. Others can attest to how political RI-CAN’s work beyond the op-eds has actually been, as there are enough tricks and ploys to fill multiple articles.

This would-be neutral stance ignores that there is nothing more political than educating a child. If you disagree, ask yourself why RI went without an equitable (but imperfect) funding formula for over a decade, why public school students in RI pay for transit and private school students don’t, or even why some textbooks cover evolution and others don’t. I may be accused of begging the question, “education is political because it’s political,” but the fact is these the answers to these questions will always be determined by the relative power of the groups involved, and students’ learning experiences can vary wildly across communities as a result. That people and power necessarily determine what our children learn should be undeniable. Still, Ms. Butke denies:

I have never considered my views on education liberal or conservative. Though a lifelong progressive, it never occurred to me that teaching and learning in public schools was a partisan issue. At its core, education reform is about improving educational outcomes for kids. How could anyone – Democrat or Republican – disagree with that?

I have no clue what “improving educational outcomes” actually means, so I guess I’m the lone dissenter. What I do have a clue about is that in a field like education, moves like these to depoliticize and take the “neutral” high ground are themselves politically charged maneuvers. Relentlessly asserting political neutrality performs two functions for the education reform movement:

1)   It builds the myth that the inverse is also true — that engaging in political work means opposing educational advancement. So, in a mind-bending twist of logic, teachers unions and other groups must defend themselves against the absurd charge that they don’t care about education.

2)   It allows the Gates, Waltons, and Broads of education to throw their hands in the air, claim innocence in the current state of education, and bestow themselves license to privatize schools and dismantle public education’s most promising aspects—democratic control, universal access, standard-setting fair and inclusive labor practices, etc.

When we consciously or subconsciously suggest education and politics are two different issues, we perpetuate the narrative. I believe this was the concern shared by the commenters above.

However, I do side with the overlooked conclusion of Mr. Plain’s last article: this is an opportunity to debate our most important but most frequently back-burnered issue, education. Let it be established that by declaring for political office, Ms. Butke no longer has grounds to claim the solutions to our educational woes are neither Democratic nor Republican. Platitudes like “Great teachers and great schools” won’t cut it when it comes to an up-or-down vote on school funding or collective bargaining.

Exactly how will you fix schools once in office Ms. Butke? (Of course, this goes for other candidates as well.) It is up to voters in District 3, myself included, to ask questions that push past the sterile rhetoric, and it is each candidate’s responsibility to answer those questions, in detail. If we ask often enough and listen hard enough, I’m confident voters will learn some things they don’t want to hear.

Your Autograph Will Be Popular

Secretary of State sealRhode Islanders should not be surprised to find politicians asking for their autograph for the next week or so.

The nearly 2,400 people who filed Declarations of Candidacy last week have until July 13 to collect the signatures of enough eligible voters to officially put them on the ballot. The thresholds range from 50 for some municipal offices to 100 for state Senate to 1,000 signatures for the U.S. Senate.

“Be prepared for people running for office to knock on your door and approach you at the market.”

Candidates will submit their signature papers to municipal boards of canvassers, which will validate the signatures of local voters before sending them on to us. We have until July 20 to certifiy that candidates collected enough signatures to officially be placed on the ballot for the Sept. 11 primary and Nov. 6 election.

Many other milestones are included in a free 24-page guide that will help voters and candidates navigate this year’s elections. “Election Calendar 2012” outlines crucial deadlines from registering to vote to requesting a mail ballot.

Progressive vs. Old School


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Mark Binder is running against Gordon Fox.

Bob Plain asked me to keep the focus of this blog on the progressive aspects of my campaign. (And thanks, Bob, for standing up for the rights of the free press — particularly in an election.) I’ll do my best, but the writer in me also thinks that the strange things you need to do as a politician are interesting to all readers—not just progressives.

So, I’ll be doing a bit of both.

Disclosure: Yes, I’m running for office, so everything I write will probably be self-serving and “designed” to get me elected. Take it all with a grain of salt. (Or sodium substitute.)

If you want a more personal essay, I wrote about my experiences campaigning on July 4 on the Campaign site.

Grassroots vs. Entrenched

Whenever I introduce myself and say that I’m running for Representative to the RI House from District 4 there is a long pause and people ask, “Isn’t that Gordon Fox’s District? He’s the entrenched speaker of the House. He’ll have all sorts of people supporting him.”

I smile and (like a good politician) reply, “There are 10,000 voters who live in this district. I’m one of them.”

Then they ask me, “Are you insane?”

This is usually followed by a long explanation that my opponent is entrenched, has the support of everybody, hundreds of thousands of dollars in the bank, and how unworkable and dirty Rhode Island politics can be.

To which I reply, “Then you certainly ought to vote for me.”

A few days ago, I got an email from a constituent:

Your candidacy is already making a difference, as Fox wants to win back his marriage equality constituents.

Answering Mr. Fox on 38 Studios

Gordon Fox doesn’t know. He just doesn’t know. (“I don’t know,” he says, on Fox news, June 7.) I’m no sure why he doesn’t know, but he doesn’t.

The basic idea behind the 38 Studios deal was this wager

  • If we win, we get 400 high paying jobs in Rhode Island that cost the taxpayer a cent
  • If we lose, we lose millions upon millions of dollars and all the jobs.

Because of this candidacy, Gordon Fox has increased his communications with the press about the 38 Studios disaster. (Listen on RIPR. Read in the Providence Journal NOTE: The printed edition of the story differs dramatically from the online version. An interesting shift in history being rewritten as it happens.)

The salient points are this: Mr. Fox trusted that the EDC was going to keep track of things, and didn’t have any checks or balances in place to protect the state of Rhode Island.

Did they? Back in June, Mr. Fox said, “I don’t know.”

I understand that public officials have to trust the people who are working for the citizens of the state. That said, I am fed up with our government giving away tax payer dollars with no concrete backend or long-term payoff.

Some tax breaks benefit… Some not so much.

Do tax reduction incentives and credits bring in business? Sure. Do these reductions and incentives create loyalty? Absolutely not.

The Film and TV credits provided jobs and got movies made and dollars spent here. But movies are by nature short term projects. The Historic Tax credits (by and large) got buildings reconstructed and rebuilt infrastructure that is still standing, regardless of the economic health of the corporation.

Time and again we’ve cut taxes, given credits and breaks and seen projects collapse without benefiting the state, or companies flee Rhode Island when these benefits are done and they’ve made their profits.

Repeat after me: major corporations are loyal to their shareholders, not the citizens of Rhode Island.

Update

For a while, I got caught with the rhetoric that Rhode Island was offering “Loan Guarantees” and it wasn’t going to cost us anything. I was wrong. We, the taxpayers, sold bonds and have to pay them back. Kudos to Gina Raimondo for insisting we own up to the debt.

With unemployment up and the economy down, how are we going to pay them back?

Revamping Education vs. Power… at the 11th hour

One of the key issues in my campaign is a very simple shift in the way this State deals with public education.

I believe that the use of high stakes testing to determine school financing and teacher evaluations is a misdirected travesty. It’s bad for the students, bad for the teachers and good for the testing companies and consultants.

Here’s an equation. An “A student” and a non-English speaking student take a test. One scores 100%. The other gets a zero. The average? 50%, which means that school is failing. Never mind the teachers, potential of the students to learn more  or the curriculum…

Yes, I know there is a ton of federal money tied into this, but how much money would we save if we weren’t spending our time on testing, test prep, test evaluation and test intimidation? More important, how much more would students learn if they weren’t losing class time to testing?

The other week I was listening to NPR, and Diane Ravitch, the former head of education under George H. W. Bush, said something that clicked. I’m going to paraphrase:

Testing kills innovation and creativity. You don’t teach a kid to love and play baseball by testing them on it. You don’t start by teaching them the rules, then give them a test. Then next year, you make them memorize the history of the game to World War II (including the Negro Leagues) . Then give them a test. Next year it’s Post War baseball. Then a test. Then you have options. You can study the statistics of baseball (with tests) or the chemistry and biology of baseball (with tests on testing). Then, to celebrate, they’ll take you to a ball game.

Legislative bodies can pass laws, repeal laws, change laws, or leave things alone. When it comes to testing, I recommend that we back off. Let the schools and teachers use tests to understand what the students need to learn — so that they can teach those students, not as proof one way or another that something is failing or succeeding.

What did Mr. Fox do about education?

In addition to approving full-steam ahead testing, Mr. Fox and the gang decided on a different approach. They thought that a mashup of the Board of Higher Education (the colleges and university) and the Board of Regents (K-12) would save money and be… better. Never mind that pretty much everyone in those departments was opposed. Never mind that the public didn’t know about it. The whole process was taking too long, so they decided to just jam it into the budget at the last minute, and tell everyone, tough. (R.I. House passes plan to merge education boards, Providence Journal.)

Will it work?

Answering Mr. Fox on Marriage Equality

Recently, Gordon Fox promised that if he’s re-elected, he will run for Speaker of the House, and if he wins that, he will push for an immediate vote legalizing same-sex marriage in Rhode Island.

Yaay! Whoo hoo! (About time.)

As a supporter of marriage equality, I applaud my opponent and am glad that regardless of whomever wins this election the Rep from District 4 will cast a vote for this important piece of law.

Why didn’t Mr. Fox  push it through using all the power at his disposal as the Speaker of the House? “I don’t know.”

Personally, I wish that years ago, when we had the chance to be the first state in the Union to legalize same-sex marriage, we’d done so. If we had,  Rhode Island would have gotten all the tourist dollars from same-sex couples wishing to get married in our beautiful state.


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387