ACLU to sue state over high stakes NECAP requirement


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

seattle-test-boycottThe stakes are being raised if the state wants to push ahead with using the NECAP test as a high stakes graduation requirement. The policy of using the school assessment test to assess individual students used to just be unpopular, but it will soon also be the subject of lawsuit brought by the RI ACLU.

Executive Director Steve Brown said this morning that the public would have to wait for a event later this morning to learn about the specifics of the lawsuit. We’ll post more information on this as it is available.

“The  lawsuit is a follow-up to a petition that 17 organizations signed last month calling for an end to the high stakes test mandate,” according to an email from the ACLU yesterday.

The ACLU and others have said using the NECAP test as a high-stakes graduation requirement violates the civil rights of special education and English language learners.

In May, Education Board Chairwoman Eva Mancuso told RI Future that the Board would reconsider using the NECAP as a graduation requirement.

The NECAP test as a high-stakes graduation requirement has become a flashpoint in public education politics in Rhode Island, as many of the arguments against the test have gained traction during Deborah Gist’s high-profile contract debate. Here’s how the ProJo described the flashpoint in an article published this morning:

Opposition to the testing requirement has gained momentum over the past six months, with students, parents and teachers arguing that the test is unfair, especially for urban and minority students who they say haven’t been adequately prepared, especially for the math portion of the test.

Educators have faulted the test because they say it was not designed to be used as a so-called high-stakes test.

The General Assembly recently passed a non-binding resolution expressing its objection to linking the NECAP to a high school diploma.

State Education Commissioner Deborah A. Gist has come under heavy criticism for her refusal to back down on the testing mandate, and, at one point, her fate in Rhode Island appeared tied to the NECAP. She recently received a two-year extension of her contract after a protracted closed-door discussion by the Rhode Island Board of Education, which oversees K-12 and the state’s three public colleges.

Learn more about GMO’s on Thursday in Providence


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

On Friday, the USDA rubber-stamped the first of many new genetically engineered seeds, under the department’s new approval process.  As the issue of GE seeds, myriad hazards of glyphosate, and other biotechnology concerns have gained media coverage, momentum continues to build among anti-GMO activists.

The next meeting of RI Against GMO will be held at the Rochembeau Library in Providence Thursday at 7 p.m.,  anyone who cannot attend in person is welcome to Skype. Hope to see you there! For more information, please join this Facebook group.

knowgmo

 

The election of 2010 (Part 8 of MMP RI)


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
2010 AG Election Results
Voter percentages from 2010. DEM = Democratic Party, GOP = Republican Party, IND = Independent, MOD = Socialist Party. (via Samuel G. Howard)
Voter percentages from 2010. DEM = Democratic Party, GOP = Republican Party, IND = Independent, MOD = Moderate Party, GRN = Green Party. (via Samuel G. Howard)

President Obama’s first term had devolved into the massive bungling of the Affordable Care Act. Republican intransigence in Washington combined with Obama’s refusal to stake out positions for his healthcare reform left Democratic partisans confused and disheartened. Meanwhile, Republicans were rallying against any change, and they had fired themselves up into a new movement, the Tea Party.

In Rhode Island, the situation was more confused. While the Republicans had nominated outgoing Gov. Carcieri’s senior communications advisor, the Democrats had selected General Treasurer Frank Caprio. Meanwhile, Ken Block was running at the top of the ticket for Rhode Island’s newly minted third party, the Moderates. But the candidate who had the most name recognition was former US Sen. Lincoln Chafee.

Since his defeat in 2006, Chafee had unaffiliated and back Barack Obama’s election in 2008. He would go on to narrowly win the Governorship, after Caprio insulted the President and it made national news. Staunch Democratic voters were left with little choice but to choose Chafee, the man they had rallied to defeat merely four years before.

The key issue that would effect apportionment of the General Assembly were the Moderate candidates for the House. While they captured only 1.62% of the vote for House candidates, this meant they had enough to gain two seats in that chamber from their list. For first time possibly since the 1850s, a party other than the Democrats or Republicans had access to the most powerful part of Rhode Island government. Democrats also lost their veto-proof supermajority in both chambers.

Those gains came at the expense of Democrats, who lost 10 seats, with two going to the moderates, and eight going to the Republicans. Republicans managed to gain three seats from the districts as well.

In the Senate, Democrats lost six seats to the Republicans, four of which were from districts. Observers attributed the success to an abundance of general election races in the districts, though noted that much of those contests were due to independent candidates.

Implications

The 2010 election is the most interesting to me (after 1996’s Year of the Cool Moose), and it’s one I’ll return to later, but mainly because it features two statewide races with a third party candidate in it. The other thing is the nature of the Republican gains.

Even in real life, Republicans managed to increase their seats by 100% in the Senate and 50% in the House. The gains are less stunning in MMP, but still significant. And the primary reason wasn’t GOP motivation. Take the 2004 and 2006 elections for Democrats. Democrats won in 2006 (in the MMP version of events) due to a combination of Democratic fervor and Republican apathy.

For Republicans in 2010, their gains were almost completely due to Democratic apathy. While collectively, Republicans shed around 3000-10,000 votes, Democrats collectively lost over 90,000. These missing Democratic voters are what give the Republican Party gains, and why in the MMP version, the Moderates are able to enter the House. The Tea Party is really overblown in RI, because 2010 isn’t an election where the right wing rises up, it’s one where the left wing stays home.

The other thing to consider is that 2010 is the election in which the fewest candidates are without a challenger in the general election. It’s stating the obvious, but it’s impossible to beat an incumbent when no one runs against them.

2010 also lends credence to the idea that the way towards a healthy opposition to the Democratic Party in Rhode Island is not from the right as the Republicans and Moderates are trying, but rather from the left. A coordinated statewide campaign that effectively played on the disappointment many Democratic voters have had with the spinelessness of Democratic politicians could reap unexpectedly large dividends.

Alternatively, if Republicans wanted to win, they actually might benefit from a campaign that preyed on this disappointment to drive down Democratic turnout.

RI GA apportioned according to the D'Hondt method. (via Samuel G. Howard)
RI GA apportioned according to the D’Hondt method. (via Samuel G. Howard)

 

This is Part 8 of the MMP RI series, which posits what Rhode Island’s political landscape would look like if we had switched to a mixed-member proportional representation (MMP) system in 2002. Part 7 (the Election of 2008) is available here. Part 9 is a look at the Election of 2012.

Session spells more good news than bad for RI NOW


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Gov. Chafee signs into law the Temporary Caregivers Insurance bill.
Gov. Chafee signs into law the Temporary Caregivers Insurance bill.

The good news outweighed the bad news this legislative session for the Rhode Island chapter of the National Organization for Women, according to its bi-monthly newsletter that was sent out today.

“Perhaps never before have so many activists taken to the streets and to the State House to support and oppose issues of deep concern to Rhode Island’s citizens,” the email newsletter said. “RI NOW testified or submitted written testimony on close to 40 bills covering diverse topics including women’s health, marriage equality, economic equity, ending violence against women, and more. We lobbied members of the General Assembly and activated our members and allies through lobby days and online action alerts.

Here’s how the progressive group that advocates for social justice and women’s issues scored the session:

The Good News

  • Rhode Island passed Marriage Equality for all;
  • Temporary Caregivers Insurance will allow workers to take time off from work to care for a family member without risking financial ruin;
  • Numerous bills were stopped that would have limited a woman’s access to reproductive health care services;
  • The “Choose Life” license plate bill, which passed in the General Assembly was vetoed by Governor Chafee;
  • Funding for Court Advocate Program that serves victims of domestic violence was restored.;
  • Child care assistance was expanded so that women don’t have to lose their child care simply by taking a modest raise or promotion;
  • Minimum wage workers, two thirds of whom are women, will see the minimum wage rise to $8 in 2014;
  • Home-based child care providers have won the right to negotiate with the state to improve the state’s child care system which serves low income families

The Bad News

  • While great progress was made on eliminating gender rating in health insurance and expanding family planning services for low income women, we fell short of the support needed to get these through.
  • We made progress but fell short of the support we needed to create a dedicated funding stream for violence prevention through increased marriage license fees.

RINOW is planning a post-session party on July 27 at India Restaurant on Hope Street. More info here.

 

Rhode Island elections are broken, on purpose


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

It’s necessary for me to respond to Bob’s post about our elections. Here’s the key takeaway:

…why assume our elections and or party structure is broken when it’s much more likely that a state with a strong blue collar, union tradition and a pristine, well-protected environment would attract anything other than a bunch of liberal-minded voters?

So why then are we seeking ways to make our politics more inclusive of of a party system that doesn’t represent our community’s political ethos?

A simpler and more holistic solution would be to make local elections nonpartisan. Of course, this has the same snowball’s chance in hell of happening as does doing away with the master lever or instituting mixed-member proportional voting…

The problem with this is it makes a number of assumptions. First, that we’re attracting pro-environment, pro-union, working class Americans. We’re not. Those people were born here, many back when there was an economy that supported them and that they could in turn support. That economy has been hollowed out, both by market forces and by government forces that helped destroy it.

The other thing is that we really can’t say what RI voters are like or what their policy priorities are. A third of incumbents go unchallenged every election cycle; and even in contested elections, many Rhode Islanders never even given a chance to vote for a Republican or a Democrat (it’s often a choice between party affiliated candidate and independent candidate). We know Democratic presidents win significant victories among Rhode Islanders, but then Donald Carcieri won re-election in a year that saw presidential-year level Democratic turnout and a depressed Republican turnout. I’m always hesitant to label anyone a “DINO” because it appears to me that the Democratic Party of Rhode Island has always encompassed interests as varied as the economically left, socially liberal sort to the economically right, socially conservative sort.

But let’s say that Bob’s description of Rhode Islanders is accurate. How then are we to conclude that Rhode Island’s electoral system isn’t flawed? If we have such voters, why are they electing candidates that are anti-union and anti-environment? If it’s because they support the Democratic Party candidate even when such a candidate is a “DINO”, then we have a problem: we are electing candidates who are antithetical to the party they purport to be in.

However we split the problem, we’re seeing the issue: our elections are causing trouble and aren’t representative.

Now on to solutions.

I want to be emphatic in this: nonpartisan elections are terrible. Full stop. The best time to inform voters about their choices is on the ballot. Our ballots are stripped of information, containing only directions as how to vote. We are not informed of party platforms, candidate policies, or virtually anything else beyond candidate affiliation. Candidate affiliation is the one piece of information that people can rely on. If we strip it, we lose the last piece of information beyond the candidate’s name.

A lot of “good-government” reformers instituted nonpartisan elections in the early part of the 20th Century with the specific goal of suppressing the Socialist Party in municipal elections. Why? Because a lot of people of the time understood what the Socialist Party stood for, and they would vote for its candidates, even if they knew nothing about the candidates. After Socialist Party candidates won in a few cities, the reform effort stepped up, and sold nonpartisan elections as a way to remove corruption. In reality, it tosses elections over to monied interests.

If voters can’t tell what party you belong to, they can’t tell what values you’re supposed to have. A lot of voter contact is educating voters on candidate policy. And voter contact isn’t just a free operation. It costs a lot of money (and time, which equals money). People who have a lot money have the advantage in contacting voters, meaning they get to define themselves better to voters. They also get the chance to define their opponent. Nonpartisan elections are going to exacerbate this.

If we want to elect regular people to office, we have to do two things: clear away the unequal financing of elections and provide protection for regular people to risk the run without suffering economic damage. The Citizens United decision severely restricts us on the former. The latter is difficult because we are the major roadblock. Think about healthcare for the legislators. We get really angry because one representative collects it without paying anything, even though she works for it. Let me put it this way, your job does not involve dealing with the complaints about government from roughly 13,000 people yearly. You also don’t have to spend money to keep your job, nor try to convince 13,000 people that you should keep it.

Officeholders are exceptional in Rhode Island precisely because they can hold office. Why is it this way? Because it was designed that way. Officeholders were supposed to be the well off, which is why we made sure that you needed a level of wealth before you could vote or hold office well into the 19th Century (a commenter here once suggested that our poll tax made it all the way to the last constitutional convention). Nowadays, the poor pay, the weird hours, and the cost of running an election act as a way to keep people out of office. Nonpartisan elections only increase the barriers to regular people participating in politics.

Beyond that, political parties exist for a reason. Their removal isn’t going to make them less necessary. Want evidence? Nebraska’s Unicameral legislature is nonpartisan. Here’s an article in which virtually everyone interviewed admits that the party system still exists, it isn’t overt. Parties were created to help advance agendas, and we shouldn’t pretend like they’ve totally corrupted politics. People always point to George Washington’s farewell address with its warning against factionalism. I always point out that he gave that address with his faction in power. The oppositional faction (the forerunners to the Democrats) would take control four years later.

George Mason Prof. David Schleicher look at electoral competition in big cities was really original, and really interesting (also, he says that nonpartisan races exacerbate the lack of competition). In a lot of ways, it strengthens the party system. One of the most astounding ideas to me was basically forcing the disaffiliation of local parties. Basically, you prevent anyone from running under the banner of Democrat or Republican in a local election. So instead, depending on your locale, you might the Providence Progressive Party, or the Conservative Party of East Greenwich.

I think in Rhode Island, we could go one step further: institute a ban of same party affiliation at all three levels, but allow voters to belong to a party on each level. So I might belong the the Providence Progressive Party, the Rhode Island Action Party, and the United States Democratic Party. Thus, for Providence office, I’d appear on ballot as a Progressive. For state office, I’d show up under the Action Party banner. And if sought federal office, I’d appear on the ballot as a Democrat. It would really shatter our whole understanding of politics, and would make the coattail effect on down-ticket races evaporate.

Now, that’s a radical suggestion, and I understand that. I understand that there are reason things like this don’t get passed. And there are two main forces arrayed against massive changes. One is the political establishment, and by this I mean all those who don’t want to change the system because they understand the current one. There’s a lot of people who know how to work everything just so, and big changes will mean adaptation. If you have a 20-year or more career in office, big changes are naturally going to frighten you. The question is whether we can appeal to the politician (who is supposed to make good policy) and tamp down the person (who cares about their own self).

The other thing is what I think of as institutional inertia. We hear this usually expressed as “that’s the way it’s always been.” People invent these myths about how government works, and we can’t change it or else who knows what will happen. So instead of really reorganizing government, we make little cosmetic changes, and leave the big issues still in place. Just like master lever abolition, nonpartisan elections will leave in place problems of gerrymandering, lack of voter education, the outsized influence of money, lack of competition, etc., etc.

One of my favorite movies is The Prestige. And one of my favorite lines is “man’s grasp exceeds his reach.” That applies wonderfully here. What we reach out to change in Rhode Island is far short of what we can change in Rhode Island. The beautiful thing about democracy is that it is not natural, it is not set in stone. It is entirely human-created, and entirely changeable to the needs of its citizens. States are laboratories of democracy, and we get to run experiments with democracy. Sometimes those experiments will fail. This is the nature of experimentation.

tompaineThis is why the next constitutional convention could be the most vital thing that will happen in Rhode Island in many years. We could make cosmetic changes to our democracy, change the paint, give it a bit of tune up, maybe reupholster the seats. Or we could tear it apart, see how every little bit works, how they fit together, and then rebuild it as as a completely different kind of beast. If we are truly a “lively experiment” we must not fear to experiment.

I think it’s worth ending on this Thomas Paine quote and thinking about how it could apply to our own future constitutional convention: “We have every opportunity and every encouragement before us, to form the noblest purest constitution on the face of the earth. We have it in our power to begin the world over again.”

Occam’s razor: GOP is weak because RI is progressive


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

No RepublicansSam Howard has accomplished some of the best quantitative analysis of local elections that you will ever see produced by an unpaid journalist in his ongoing series about why mixed-member proportional voting would alter Rhode Island politics and power structures. And yesterday Ted Nesi touched on the same subject in a piece about why the Ocean State would benefit from more competitive elections. Meanwhile, it turns out Ken Block is considering running for governor as Republican rather than a Moderate.

All three events point to a similar conclusion: that a more influential GOP would improve political discourse in the Ocean State. Well … making political discourse less one-sided is a good thing only if it ALSO makes it more representational of the people the politics purports to represent.

As Nesi points out, mainstream party labels do little to describe local politicians:

“…Rhode Island Republicans have a good point – local officeholders deal with a whole range of issues that don’t easily fit into the national parties’ widely recognized platforms. If you tell me what position someone takes on Obamacare or climate change, I could probably tell you which party he or she belongs to – but I still couldn’t tell you what he thinks about mandatory parking minimums or actuarial standards for pension plans.”

I’m sure both Block and Howard would agree – though Block may feel this “good point” belongs to Moderates and Howard progressives. All three actually make the same good point – but it’s most applicable to progressives who, electorally at least, far outnumber both Republicans and Moderates in Rhode Island.

Remember Occam’s razor, the notion that the explanation with the fewest assumptions is most likely right. In other words, why assume our elections and or party structure is broken when it’s much more likely that a state with a strong blue collar, union tradition and a pristine, well-protected environment would attract anything other than a bunch of liberal-minded voters?

So why then are we seeking ways to make our politics more inclusive of of a party system that doesn’t represent our community’s political ethos?

A simpler and more holistic solution would be to make local elections nonpartisan. Of course, this has the same snowball’s chance in hell of happening as does doing away with the master lever or instituting mixed-member proportional voting…

Hopefully this would address the real disconnect between Rhode Islanders and the people we elect to public office instead of artificially giving conservatives more influence than they deserve.

Activists hope to shut down Brayton Point Sunday


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

brayton pointMore than 1,000 environmental activists from all over New England are planning a direct action at Brayton Point power station near Fall River on Sunday. Civil disobedience will be utilized in hopes of shutting down the largest coal plant in New England that is a major source of air and water pollution.

There is a “mandatory” training in Providence on Saturday for those “risking arrest.”

According to the website JoinSummerHeat.org, “We will call for Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick and others to immediately close the Brayton Point coal plant and ensure a just transition for workers and host communities towards a healthy and sustainable future.”

Brayton Point is in Somerset, Mass on Narragansett Bay, right on Rhode Island’s border. While Massachusetts’ largest source of carbon dioxide pollutes the entire northeast, the Ocean State is particularly at risk because Brayton Point is so close; it pollutes directly into Narragansett Bay and it’s air pollution is literally visible from as far away as South County.

The protest is part of the nationwide grassroot effort to call attention to the fossil fuel industry’s role in climate change and environmental and economic degradation organized by 350.org. Occupy Providence, Occupy Fall River, Fossil Free Rhode Island and the Brown (University) Divest Coal Campaign, among many others, have all promoted the event.

There is a sign-making party tonight in Providence and there will be a training in Rhode Island on Saturday for those who hope to be arrested. See this link for details.

“The training schedule on the 27th includes choreographed practice for the action, preparation for jail support, affirmation of action agreements, training in nonviolent direct action, a conversation with representatives of the National Lawyers Guild, time for forming action support groups, snacks, dinner, and more!” according to Occupy Providence’s website.

“Brayton Point is the largest coal-fired power plant in New England, and at full capacity it’s the largest source of carbon dioxide emissions in Massachusetts. In 2010, it poured 6.3 million tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere,” according to SummerHeatBraytonPoint.org. “We can transition away from coal through increased efficiency standards and a strengthened renewable energy portfolio (including visionary projects like Cape Wind). We also need worker retraining and tax support for communities like Somerset and Fall River that have long borne the costs of coal.”

The election of 2008 (Part 7 of MMP RI)


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Voter percentages from 2006. DEM = Democratic Party, GOP = Republican Party, IND = Independent, GRN = Green Party.  (via Samuel G. Howard)
Voter percentages from 2008. DEM = Democratic Party, GOP = Republican Party, IND = Independent, SOC = Socialist Party. (via Samuel G. Howard)

The 2008 election promised more bad news for the Republicans. Their nominee for President, US Sen. John McCain of Arizona, wasn’t particularly well-liked by his party’s base. While attempting to shed his “maverick” image (while at the same time attempting to play it up), McCain stumbled badly by adding half-term Gov. Sarah Palin to the ticket. Palin quickly became more popular than McCain, while at the same time becoming an anathema to moderates and liberals; ostensibly McCain’s strength lay in the idea he could appeal across the political spectrum.

In the face of this, Sen. Barack Obama was a stark contrast. His election would make a historic first of America’s first non-white president. Furthermore, he was intelligent, and a stirring orator. Obama was also the beneficiary of a large number of young voters, while he’d proven in his nomination fight he could defeat establishment political figures like Hillary Clinton. On top of NGP VAN, Obama was also establishing a new set of tools to improve campaigning, building a technological infrastructure that would serve to advantage the Democrats.

Finally, on top of all this, in September of 2008, the United States and the world suffered the worst economic catastrophe since the Great Depression. Americans have turned to the Democratic Party in times of economic peril since the Great Depression, and this year was to be no different.

However, Rhode Island’s General Assembly results were not as triumphant for the Democrats as one would expect in a presidential year favoring Democrats. Democrats actually lost 4 seats in the Senate and merely gained one in the House. Among the seats lost in the Senate was Senate President Montalbano’s, which was won by a political independent, Edward O’Neill.

O’Neill’s victory forced the General Assembly to exercise its overhang rules, meaning that one Democrat would become an extra seat. The Senate would now have 77 seats.

Though the results left the Democrats with a supermajority, Republicans were keen to portray it as a victory. In the face of stunning pressure, they’d managed gains.

Implications

2008 worked as a year of gains for the Democrats, who managed to continue an increase in turnout. While it didn’t match the upswing in votes for Republican candidates, it was enough to allow the Democrats to make a gain of seven seats in the House and take a Senate seat from Republicans while losing Montalbano’s. The MMP election shows why that seems out of sync with how we’d expect the results to shake out.

Something noteworthy in the 2008 election is that Republican Senator Francis Maher faced a Socialist Party candidate. That Socialist won nearly 2500 votes in a district that Democrats normally failed to even mount a challenger in.

RI GA apportioned according to the D'Hondt method. (via Samuel G. Howard)
RI GA apportioned according to the D’Hondt method. (via Samuel G. Howard)

 

This is Part 7 of the MMP RI series, which posits what Rhode Island’s political landscape would look like if we had switched to a mixed-member proportional representation (MMP) system in 2002. Part 6 (the Election of 2006) is available here. Part 8 is a look at the Election of 2010.

Being black while working in East Greenwich

simms boylowluCedric Simms lives in Warwick and Kona Boylowlu lives in South Providence. They are both black and live in predominantly black neighborhoods. But like Trayvon Martin had reason to be find himself in a predominantly white neighborhood, so too do Simms and Boylowlu, who work in downtown East Greenwich.

Here’s what they had to say about the George Zimmerman verdict.

Then I asked them how it feels to be black and work in East Greenwich. They both work packaging junked electronic equipment to be shipped to recycling markets overseas around the corner from where I live, and it’s no exaggeration to say that I don’t see many other folks in my neighborhood that look like Simms or Boylowlu.

This was about all the video I could shoot; my iPhone kept shutting off because it was so hot on Friday and their boss kept barking at them to get back to work. But I’m going to show them this post today and maybe interview them again to see if how they feel now that a few more days have passed, the heat wave has broken and Obama addressed the nation.

The election of 2006 (Part 6 of MMP RI)


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Voter percentages from 2004. DEM = Democratic Party, GOP = Republican Party, IND = Independent, GRN = Green Party, W-I = Write-In. Some percentages add up above 100% due to rounding. (via Samuel G. Howard)
Voter percentages from 2006. DEM = Democratic Party, GOP = Republican Party, IND = Independent, GRN = Green Party.  (via Samuel G. Howard)

Nationally, the Bush Administration’s bungling of immigration reform and the ongoing failure to end the Iraq War (while the falsification of the cause for war was becoming apparent) had made the Republican Party toxic. At the same time, Howard Dean’s chairmanship of the Democratic Party began institutionalizing data collection for the party via NGP VAN. Democrats were vitalized to throw the Republicans out of power, ending GOP dominance in Washington since the Contract With America.

In Rhode Island, Republicans further weakened incumbent US Senator Lincoln Chafee by primarying him with right-winger Stephen Laffey. When combined with the anti-Republican fervor sweeping the country, he went down against former RI Attorney General Sheldon Whitehouse.

Gov. Donald Carcieri narrowly won reelection over Lt. Gov. Charlie Fogarty, and as usual, the whole slew of general officers below the gubernatorial level were returned as Democrats.

Low Republican turnout meant gains for Democrats in the GA. Close to 50,000 fewer people voted Republican in Senate races than in 2004, while around 30,000 fewer people voted Republican in House races. Combined with a failure to contest district seats, and Democrats saw significant gains. Democrats gained 10 seats in the House and nine seats in the Senate; with Republicans losing the equivalent.

Republicans complained about the master lever costing them votes. Democrats smiled.

Implications

In real life, this was not actually as stunning a shift. In an MMP election, the shifts are 10 seats in the House, 9 in the Senate; all to the Democrats. In reality, Democrats held steady at 33 seats in the Senate, and only gained two seats in the House. What’s even more stunning to me is that while votes for Republican candidates completely collapsed, Democrats actually boosted their turnout over 2004, which defies the common wisdom of “presidential election years favor Democrats because of high turnout.”

Interestingly enough, the vote for independent candidates completely cratered at this point, with House independents only receiving a combined 0.19% of the vote. In 2008, it would soar to the heights it’s achieved in the last three elections.

RI GA apportioned according to the D'Hondt method. (via Samuel G. Howard)
RI GA apportioned according to the D’Hondt method. (via Samuel G. Howard)

 

This is Part 6 of the MMP RI series, which posits what Rhode Island’s political landscape would look like if we had switched to a mixed-member proportional representation (MMP) system in 2002. Part 5 (the Election of 2004) is available here. Part 7 is a look at the Election of 2008.

Detroit’s bankruptcy is not a progressive problem


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

I got this great essay in my inbox last night by a fellow who’d like to be known as Earl Williams. It’s long and well-worth a read. The premise is that racial tensions in the late ’60’s early ’70’s contributed significantly to Detroit’s demise. It’s a sort-of response to the always-entertaining but never-very-convincing Travis Rowley’s Saturday missive how the left killed Detroit….

Personally, I lay a lot of the blame on NAFTA, the Clinton-era free trade agreement that promised economic growth but delivered depression for the Rust Belt and bigger bottom lines for corporations and CEOs. But Earl makes a good case that the problem started long before a globalized economy took its toll.

Also, please read this report I wrote in 2011 about Occupy Detroit’s efforts to pick up where the economy and then the public sector had failed

As the right wing dances gleefully on the fresh grave of the motor city, trading clever epithets to carve on the once great city’s tombstone, many economic truths lay buried beneath the soil in the motor city’s tomb. Already the comparison has been made to Rhode Island and whether the fate of our own, small state, can be divined by the default of the enormous debt owed by the industrial city once known as the Arsenal of Democracy.

The easy propaganda, eulogizing the economic demise of Detroit is that the socialist, liberal, welfare experiment has failed miserably and any economy that even slightly resembles Detroit’s will suffer the same cancerous fate. These voices will have one believe that unions killed Detroit; social welfare killed Detroit; taxes killed Detroit; pensions killed Detroit; etc. Furthermore, the example set forth by the city’s landslide into chapter 9 is quickly becoming rhetorical ammunition for the conservative argument against government employees’ retirement security, private and public sector unions and social safety-net programs for those below the poverty line.

These oversimplified condemnations of political philosophies are merely excellent distractions to factual history and the series of events that led to the critical condition in which Detroit currently finds itself. If by liberal failures, one actually means negative economic impact of race riots due to black disenfranchisement during the civil rights conflicts of the 1960s, then they are absolutely right.

In the summer of 1967, five days of race riots hit the city. Over the course of those days, 43 people died. There were 467 injured, including 167 Detroit police officers, 83 Detroit firefighters, 17 National Guard troops, 16 State Police officers and 3 U.S. Army soldiers. The economic ramifications proved to be a permanent and crippling injury. 2,509 stores looted or burned, 388 families rendered homeless or displaced and 412 buildings burned or damaged to the point of requiring demolition. The total monetary damage was estimated to be between $40 and $80 million. The aforementioned permanent damage was the flight of the emerging middle-class population from the city to the suburbs.

According to Coleman Young, Detroit’s first black mayor, “The heaviest casualty,however, was the city. Detroit’s losses went a hell of a lot deeper than the immediate toll of lives and buildings. The riot put Detroit on the fast track to economic desolation, mugging the city and making off with incalculable value in jobs, earnings taxes, corporate taxes, retail dollars, sales taxes, mortgages, interest, property taxes, development dollars, investment dollars, tourism dollars, and plain damn money.

The money was carried out in the pockets of the businesses and the white people who fled as fast as they could. The white exodus from Detroit had been prodigiously steady prior to the riot, totally twenty-two thousand in 1966, but afterwards it was frantic. In 1967, with less than half the year remaining after the summer explosion—the outward population migration reached sixty-seven thousand. In 1968 the figure hit eighty thousand, followed by forty-six thousand in 1969.

Since then, the city’s urban population has consistently declined. Demographically speaking, the least financially secure have been the population that remained, while the more financially contributory citizens have continued to avoid residency within the city limits. Less tax revenue and more financial insecurity has proved a recipe for unsustainable, fiscal liability. This is an easily arguable example of what is known as “the new Jim Crow.” So, a founding principle of the state of the city is a race based economic decline.

Perhaps, though, the liberal failures of which those who exploit the unfortunate bankruptcy of a city that helped to birth the backbone of America’s economic prowess. Detroit has also been a historically union city and necessarily so. In the 1920s, a Protestant minister trained at Yale Divinity School by the name of Reinhold Niebuhr, earned national attention by criticizing the auto industry in an era when Henry Ford was considered an American icon. He preached the Social Gospe, attacking what he considered the brutalization and insecurity of Ford workers. He became an outspoken critic of Ford and allowed union organizers to use his pulpit to expound their message of workers’ rights. Niebuhr attacked poor conditions created by the assembly lines and erratic employment practices.

The demonization of collective bargaining is a historically recent generational ideology. The mindset that one man builds his own kingdom by grasping his proverbial bootstraps and hoisting with all his might. Those who fail to prosper lack the fortitude by which to defy the gravity and, thereby, earn their meager places as the stepping-stones for the strong. However, the reality of the creation of the middle class, through which America has attained its precarious position at the top of the world’s economic food chain, was possible only with the rise of the labor unions. In fact, without the living wage set as a standard by the labor movement, those masses who provided the purchasing power for the very products that rolled off the assembly lines of the golden-era Detroit automobile plants would have been a commodity for those landed gentry who often fabricated the bootstrap mythology as their American heritage.

But, since the one percent progressively seized more and more power from the working class citizens, the history has been re-written to focus only on the small corner of corruption within the story of the labor movement in Detroit and elsewhere. This same agenda has conveniently ignored the corruption of the fabulously wealthy coalitions such as ALEC, and Wall Street and the Republican Party when stealing election rights, deregulating the banking industry to the point of economic collapse and starting multi-trillion dollar wars for profit.

And that brings the discussion of Detroit, full circle, to current conversation. As one outspoken and sensationalist holy man residing in the fantasy land United States of Glen Beckistan summarized, “Detroit’s demise hasn’t been good for either of the two parties that are often set against one another – taxpayers and unionized government employees – whenever government grows beyond its appropriate size and leftists begin to use state power to redistribute private wealth.”

Leftists begin to use state power to redistribute private wealth? Actually, one can take that particular point and dismantle it with a single proper noun: Mitt Romney. If, in fact, the situation in Detroit hasn’t been good for either party then why did the 2012 Republican Presidential nominee so enthusiastically endorse the bankruptcy of the auto industry – much of which was notoriously based in Detroit? Could it be that the fall of the industry that has been under Republican attack for decades would result in enormous profit for Romney and the company in which he held an enormous “blind trust” (come on now, really?) stake? One that yielded he and his wife upwards of $115 million? That seems to be a prime example of the polar opposite of redistribution of private wealth. In fact, that seems to be encouraging the hard earned wages of those working class Americans in pursuit of a middle class American dream to funnel into a financial wormhole with a small group of already overstuffed wallets open and waiting at the other end.

Detroit is not Central Falls. Detroit is not Providence and Detroit is certainly not the state of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations. One can find comparisons between apples and oranges. Both are round. Both are fruit. One can find comparisons between the Tour de France and NASCAR. Both are races with wheeled vehicles. One can find comparisons between Humans and possums. Both are mammals separated by a surprisingly small percentage of DNA. However, legalities aside (states cannot declare bankruptcy by law), Detroit is not the canary in the coalmine for the future of the State of Rhode Island. And, as exemplified by its very unique history, is more than just an easily exploited cautionary tale for progressive political ideology.

Race still matters


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

do-the-right-thingI am sorry. I really am, but race matters. While some may argue that it does not and others interject it into every conflict, race continues to be an issue that stirs many emotions.

The Providence Journal recently offered a front-page story detailing the results of the Zimmerman case. On page two of the same paper there was an article about the 10th Annual Smoke Shop Raid ceremony being held by the Narragansett Indian Tribe. I could not help but go to a place that asks the question “How come, that in the year 2013, many Americans still feel marginalized due to their race?”

No matter how much I read. No matter how diverse my friendships and associations might be. No matter that I have worked with populations that have been disproportionally criminalized. No matter how many of these things might be in play I still cannot fully relate to how it feels to be placed at significant disadvantage due to race.

No relative of mine has been tortured within the last 100 years for whistling at a woman. No relative of mine has been lynched by an angry mob either. No relative of mine had to go to bathrooms that were set aside for them outside of those for the dominant population. No relative of mine has been sent to a reservation, denied the right to vote or chased around by a group wearing hoods whose purpose in life is to harass minority populations. Much has changed over the years. We have a Black Man as President, lynchings have gone the way of the History Books and schools that force Native Americans to assimilate into our culture by cutting their hair and denying connections to ancient spiritual traditions are no longer open.

With all of this said many Blacks and Native Americans still feel they are outsiders. In addition, many Latino’s feel the same way. Ignoring these feelings and perceptions only makes things worse. Discrediting these viewpoints does not help either. For those in power, to assert that what happened long ago has little to do with today and that Blacks, Native Americans and Latinos have to get over it is absurd. Of course the past impacts the present. It effects the distribution of wealth. It impacts attitudes about inter-racial marriage, who is your next door neighbor and how some might view ‘one of those people’ as a family member. Again, many have moved beyond these points. Still many have not. On top of all this – these attitudes have influenced those who long suffered them to have a different worldview. Should that be a surprise?

In my lifetime African Americans were once denied entrance into many colleges. In my lifetime I also witnessed the first generation of Blacks allowed entry into Major League Baseball (Elston Howard, Ernie Banks, Pumpsie Green). I can also remember when Frank Robinson became the first black manager when he took the helm of the Cleveland Indians.

In my lifetime Freedom Riders were killed by racists. In my lifetime Blacks were still getting lynched, denied voting access and considered too dumb to play Quarterback in the National Football League. As a child I saw the images of dogs and fire hoses used on Bull Connor’s orders against peaceful protesters. I also remember Hank Aaron receiving death threats for trying to break Babe Ruth’s Home Run Record.

Also, in my lifetime many Native Americans lived in squalor on reservations. An outrageous percentage suffer from the disease of Alcoholism. In addition, they still endure stereotypes that include them being referred to as ‘Redskins’ by a sports franchise that resides in our nation’s Capitol. In my lifetime Russell Means led a takeover of the Mayflower II to gain our nation’s attention. Thanksgiving is not the same for everyone.

Finally, in my lifetime Latinos are still marginalized in our school systems, denied paths to citizenship and often depicted as ‘Pepino’ types from ‘The Real McCoys’. Remember Bill Dana as Jose Jimenez? Remember Cesar Chavez and his fight to provide dignity for Farm Workers? All of this has happened during the course of one man’s existence. Some things have changed over that span, but hundreds of years of prejudice, being denied viable education and economic hardships still places many at a disadvantage. Going forward more needs to change. Perhaps a starting point would be the recognition that we have not all sprinted from the same starting line. Some are 30 yards up the track, while others have just gained entry to the race. Some might also be 350 years up the track. That is a pretty big lead.

So, here we are in the greatest country on earth with one big fat problem concerning race. This piece is not about anointing African Americans, Native Americans, Latinos (and occasionally others) with a sainthood label. All ethnic groups are comprised with those both good and bad. Foibles abound in the human condition. No, this article is seeking to point out that we still have a ways to go when it comes to Race.

Michelle Alexander wrote a wonderful book a few years ago titled ‘The New Jim Crow’. One of the more salient points she makes has to do with racism basically going underground. It is more subtle these days. Today, Blacks are marginalized by a legal system that disproportionately places them under its control (Prison, Parole, Probation). Because of this they often have records that deny access to employment. Because of this families are shattered. Again, I am not saying that people who commit horrific crimes should not be punished. But, at the least, we might want to take a look at our drug policies. We also might want to explore why there is such an imbalance concerning who gets incarcerated.

Native Americans and Latinos have also been hurt by laws, policies, treaties and exploitation. In fact, broken treaties with the Indians have almost become a Hollywood cliché. As for the Latinos, I wonder how many businesses have benefitted from their cheap labor? While much has been written about tightening up immigration laws – little is said regarding folks getting rich by exploiting desperate populations.

Up until I was about 10 years old my Dad worked 2 jobs and 70-80 hours a week to keep the family going. We rented until I was about to enter the 2nd grade. Despite all of this I was never denied access into a new home due to our heritage (Irish, English and Dutch). Never once did I have to worry about not being allowed into any house because of my race. Never once did I have to hear that my kind was not smart enough. We may have had to cut things close a few times but despite it all I had opportunities some folks never get. There is a huge difference between struggling and not being allowed to participate.

The issue of race is closely connected to many other concerns. Prison reform, education, gun control, immigration, poverty, class, jobs and politics all are impacted to some extent by race. Those who choose to ignore this fail to recognize (whether right or wrong) the viewpoint(s) of many who have little faith in systems that have often minimized their concerns. This is something that has to be taken seriously.

The Zimmerman trial has shown just how polarized we are regarding race. On the one hand there are folks citing the law being upheld, an innocent man freed and ‘race having nothing to do with it’. On the other hand are those pointing to racial profiling, Stand Your Ground not making sense and another example of a failed system. These feelings and opinions are often visceral. It seems that one side is arguing the technical value of right and wrong (under the law) while the opposite view centers on feelings and history. A marriage of these can only occur when a true dialogue followed by understanding and change takes place.

The United States is the greatest country on earth. Greater still is the idea of the United States. We are a nation capable of incredible things. We can change. We can embrace. We can achieve. Along with class, race continues to challenge. It is a shame that it is so. It is also a shame that many innocents get caught up in the aftermath caused by not dealing and addressing.

The Zimmerman case might have been about things like guns, Stand Your Ground and the legal system. It also included race. To what extent and from whose perspective is up for debate. Ignoring its racial component (profiling and the interpretation of the verdict) is to deny years of pain and mistrust. That is short sighted. Yes, we need to move on. But, moving on means recognizing and respecting. We all need to move on. Before doing so there is a lot of work to do. In many ways Trayvon Martin’s death has provoked a great deal of discussion. Hopefully, we will not need many more trials like this one to figure things out. Due to much posturing, fear, ignorance, greed, misunderstanding and stereotypes we really do not know as much about each other as we should. Cards get played (by all sides) in place of real dialogue. There is much more to say and a whole lot more to do. While we wait for politicians to fix and make laws to ameliorate our concerns, maybe we would be better off looking to ourselves. Perhaps the real change will come person-to-person, moment-to-moment. Hopefully, we will have the courage to try.

Ahlquist backs Constitution on 10 News Conference


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Humanist Steve Ahlquist went head-to-head with anti-choice lobbyist Barth Bracy on NBC 10 News Conference to debate the “Choose Life” license plate scandal, but the best part was when the two disagreed over whether or not abortion is akin to killing a human being.

“Why do we have birthdays instead of conception days?” Ahlquist asked rhetorically. “Because we know that upon being born is when you are a person. you are separated from your mother and we know consider you to be an entity.

“The idea that human life begins at conception kind of … There is human life in our blood, in our skin, we are all genetically human. To say that a fetus or a fertilized egg is a human being … there is a potential here, there is a potential to be human here.

Watch the whole show here:

News, Weather and Classifieds for Southern New England

Sequester means fewer swimmers, less money


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
This photo, courtesy of Save The Bay, is from the early 1980's.
This photo, courtesy of Save The Bay, is from the early 1980’s.

The sequester has not only affected the route of the annual Save The Bay swim, but the popular and iconic annual summer fundraiser will also attract fewer swimmers on Saturday and less money too.

Many are disappointed they don’t get to swim across Narragansett Bay from Newport to Jamestown this year because the random federal budget cuts of the sequester prevented the Naval War College in Newport from participating. This will also have tangible affects on Save The Bay’s efforts to save Narragansett Bay, said spokesman Peter Hanney.

“If we had our druthers we would have made it work,” he said, “but it caught up in politics.”

Hanney said the Naval War College was just as disappointed as were Ocean State environmental activists. “The local Naval personnel were very supportive of the Swim and were equally upset with this policy decision from Washington, D.C.”

Last year about 470 people made the swim from Newport to Jamestown and this year about 400 swimmers have registered to swim the triangle pattern around Potter Cove in Jamestown.

And fewer Bay swimmers means less fundraising for Save The Bay. Last year, the swim raised more than $350,000. This year, said Hanney, “we’ll get close but we’re going to come up a little short.” He said the drop in swimmers and dollars are most likely a direct result of the retooled course.

Save The Bay could still match last year’s fundraising efforts – especially if you click on this link to donate now. They call it being a “virtual swimmer.” Click here for more on the swim in general, such as where to park and what to bring.

Since 1978, local swimmers and environmental activists have left from the Naval War College on Aquidneck Island and paralleled the Newport Bridge into Jamestown’s Potter Cove. This year swimmers will travel and triangular pattern around Potter Cove.

The annual Save The Bay swim started as a nonviolent direct action in 1977 designed to call attention to poor water quality in Narragansett Bay. Back then, Save The Bay was best known for opposing a nuclear power plant at Rome Point in North Kingstown and an LNG plant on Prudence Island. Today, both these areas are protected as federal wildlife areas instead.

Since those early swims, Save The Bay activists have been at the forefront of most of the efforts to protect the Ocean State from environmental degradation. In 1986, it led the effort to make Rhode Island the first state in the nation to mandate curbside recycling.

For more awesome old pictures of the Save The Bay swim click here.

Can you identify these pioneering swimmers? If so, please let us know in the comment section below.

This photo, courtesy of Save The Bay, is from the early 1980's.
This photo, courtesy of Save The Bay, is from the early 1980’s.

 

 

The election of 2004 (Part 5 of MMP RI)

Voter percentages from 2004. DEM = Democratic Party, GOP = Republican Party, IND = Independent, LIB = Libertarian Party, GRN = Green Party. Some percentages add up above 100% due to rounding. (via Samuel G. Howard)
Voter percentages from 2004. DEM = Democratic Party, GOP = Republican Party, IND = Independent, GRN = Green Party, W-I = Write-In. Some percentages add up above 100% due to rounding. (via Samuel G. Howard)

Turnout was expected to be high in a presidential election year. The Iraq War, which had seen a nation toppled in less than a month, was entering a bloody phase. In April, the US Marines had been defeated at Fallujah, almost exactly a year after President Bush had declared “Mission Accomplished” aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln. Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts attempted to hold Bush to one term, in a divisive election that helped solidify the idea of a “red state-blue state” divide in America.

Though Rhode Island was decisively a blue state, a dispute between Providence’s firefighters and Mayor Cicilline prevented Vice Presidential candidate John Edwards from visiting Rhode Island, as he refused to cross the union picket line.

In the General Assembly, Democrats lost seats, even as they won a new seat in Senate. Republicans seized upon that seat gain to suggest that redistricting was a problem; how had Democrats managed to gain a new district seat if their share of the votes had gone down? Democrats countered with the fact that a renewed emphasis on contesting seats had yielded the Republican four new district seats, defeating four Democrats in head-to-head races. Perhaps if Republicans focused on running instead of complaining, they might do better.

In total, Republicans gained two seats in the Senate and five seats in the House. Republicans told their members they were doing better, and the end of Democratic control was coming soon. Democrats grumbled.

Implications

In reality, though the Republicans gained four seats in the House, they actually lost a seat in the Senate. 2004 was the high watermark for Republican turnout, not as a percent wise, but total votes. In both House and Senate races, over 120,000 people cast their votes for Republican candidates. Collectively, Republican candidates tend to must 30,000 to 20,000 votes less. Though Republicans managed to turnout in large numbers, Democrats turnout in even higher numbers, improving somewhere around 40,000 voters over 2002.

RI GA apportioned according to the D'Hondt method. (via Samuel G. Howard)
RI GA apportioned according to the D’Hondt method. (via Samuel G. Howard)

 

This is Part 5 of the MMP RI series, which posits what Rhode Island’s political landscape would look like if we had switched to a mixed-member proportional representation (MMP) system in 2002. Part 4 (the Election of 2002) is available here. Part 6 is a look at the Election of 2006.

Sheldon, Abel talk climate change at O’ Mist


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
The deck at the Ocean Mist just keeps getting closer and closer to the water. (photo by Bob Plain)
The deck at the Ocean Mist just keeps getting closer and closer to the water. (photo by Bob Plain)

No one in Washington DC has been more vocal about the need to address climate change than Senator Sheldon Whitehouse. And here in Rhode Island, no one has been more vocal than Sierra Club director and former congressional candidate Abel Collins.

On Friday, at 2pm, these two leading climate activists will be together at the Ocean Mist in Matunuck – perhaps the most obvious example of how climate change is and will continue to alter coastal Rhode Island. The iconic Ocean State beach that is a mainstay of the Matunuck economy gets closer and closer to the water as climate change exacerbates coastal erosion.

From the Facebook event:

It’s been a hot week. Cool off on Friday and come have a FREE Climate Change Cocktail and Sign the Washington Bound Banner! Speakers include Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, Kevin Finnegan O’Mist Owner, and more. For additional information call 401-578-0210

For more on climate change, Whitehouse speaks about it on the Senat floor every single week. Here’s his address from this week:

Republicans hold 39th vote to undermine Obamacare


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Yesterday, House Republicans voted two more times to undercut the Affordable Care Act – their 38th and 39th efforts to gut Obamacare.

As part of the historic health care reform bill that Congress passed and President Obama signed into law in 2010, the roughly 4% of all American businesses with more than 50 employees will be required to offer health care coverage to their workers.

And earlier this month, the Obama administration announced that it would delay implementation of the employer mandate until 2015 – a move that is expected to allow those businesses affected by the law to transition properly.

But rather than work with Democrats to ensure the law is implemented in a way that benefits as many families as possible, Republicans in the House are playing politics and holding yet another round of votes to undermine health care reform – votes that have literally no chance of ever becoming law.

What’s so disturbing is that this has become the rule, rather than the exception for Washington Republicans. Ever since taking control of the House, Republican leaders have refused to work across the aisle to put people back to work and pass a real jobs bill. Instead, they keep going back to the same well – offering political red meat that satisfies their Tea Party base but doesn’t offer a plan to put middle class families back to work.

The White House criticized this latest round of efforts to relitigate the health care debate, saying that it “strongly” opposes the two bills offered by House Republicans because they “would cost millions of hard-working middle class families the security of affordable health coverage and care they deserve.”

The Affordable Care Act is already providing concrete benefits for residents of Rhode Island’s First Congressional District, according to a staff report prepared this month by Democrats on the House Committees on Energy and Commerce, Ways and Means, and Education and the Workforce. According to this report, 146,000 residents of the First Congressional District now have health insurance that covers preventive services without co-pays, coinsurance, or deductible; 27,000 children with pre-existing conditions are no longer denied health care coverage; 4,600 young adults can stay on their parents’ health care plans; and 7,300 seniors have received $8.8 million in prescription drug discounts.

We can’t afford to go back to the time when health insurance companies controlled our health care system. House Republican leaders should put away the political campaign slogans and partisan gamesmanship, and get serious about governing.

The election of 2002 (Part 4 of MMP RI)

Voter percentages from 2002 (via Samuel G. Howard)
Voter percentages from 2002. DEM = Democratic Party, GOP = Republican Party, IND = Independent, LIB = Libertarian Party, GRN = Green Party. Some percentages add up above 100% due to rounding. (via Samuel G. Howard)

2002 was a momentous year for Rhode Island politics. State Representative David Cicilline announced he would challenge Buddy Cianci for Mayor of Providence. The capital city was also seeing a coalition of left-wing voters working to elect a young Green Party candidate David Segal to the city council. The major battle was between liberal standard-bearer former state Sen. Myrth York and conservative businessman Donald Carcieri.

In this atmosphere of change, so too was the General Assembly changing. Though its number of districts had been downsized, nearly a decade prior voters had approved an expansion of the Assembly; both chambers would practically grow by half.

The results of the election were stunning. Carcieri triumphed over York, who underperformed among Democrats. Cianci was eliminated before election day after being found guilty of racketeering conspiracy; after overcoming a primary election, Cicilline cruised to victory. Segal entered the Providence City Council as the minority leader, the sole member whose party wasn’t “Democrat”.

And in the General Assembly, the change was hard to interpret. Certainly, neither party “lost” seats. And yet, proportionally, the Republicans were stronger than they would have been in the old FPTP system. Instead of controlling a mere 14.67% of the seats in the House, they controlled 32% of the seats. In the Senate, the old way would’ve seen them earn 15.79% of the seats. The new method assigned them 30.26% of the seats.

However, the vast majority of Republican seats were from the party list, not from districts. Failure to contest as many seats meant that their candidates were more beholden to party, rather than to constituency. The Democrats had the opposite issue; their victory in the districts meant that they assigned fewer from the lists. The Democratic delegation would be mostly made up of incumbents, while the new Republicans would be mostly fresh-faced.

The Republicans claimed victory. Here was proof that Rhode Island’s corrupt system had prevented the full choice of the voters from being acknowledged. Democrats, for their part, grumbled, and went home with a slim supermajority of the General Assembly seats.

Implications

In reality, Democrats controlled roughly 85 percent of each chamber. Republicans were essentially shunted aside, even while winning slightly less than a third of the vote. So they controlled half of what they should have in the Assembly proportional to the votes they received.

In retrospect, it seems odd that the impetus for the General Assembly being shrunk was to create greater competition for seats. Mainly, because it failed to work; about a quarter of Senate seats were uncontested (10) as were a third of House seats (34).

RI GA apportioned according to the D'Hondt method
RI GA apportioned according to the D’Hondt method. (via Samuel G. Howard)

 

This is Part 4 of the MMP RI series, which posits what Rhode Island’s political landscape would look like if we had switched to a mixed-member proportional representation (MMP) system in 2002. Part 3 (an explanation of MMP and an account of the methods used to create these posts) is available here. Part 5 is a look at the Election of 2004.

11 actually awesome things about RI


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
scarborough beach

A Facebook friend of mine posted this piece of crap BuzzFeed list apparently sponsored by Mini USA purporting to be “11 Awesome Facts You Never Knew About Rhode Island”. Of course, there’s tons of cool stuff here, but whoever is in Mini USA’s research department couldn’t be bothered to even correctly pull facts off of our Wikipedia page.

I figured since I actually live here and actually LOVE my state, I could do better. So here’s 11 Actually Awesome Facts About Rhode Island. We know most of them, but this is for non-Rhode Islanders.

1. The Narragansett language is the origin of words like “moose”, “squash” and “pow-wow”. You can thank them yourself for having such great words if you’re ever in the area.

If you're British, you call this a "marrow" (via Wikimedia Commons)
If you’re British, you call this a “marrow”. “Squash” is objectively better. (via Wikimedia Commons)

2. RI has a state drink, and it’s coffee milk (suck it, Indiana). It’s made like chocolate milk, you mix syrup into the milk. We have multiple brands of coffee syrup. You can try Autocrat and Eclipse by Autocrat, or try Dave’s Coffee Syrup.*

Autocrat and Eclipse are both made by Autocrat (via Wikimedia Commons)
I see there’s “gourmet” coffee syrup as well. (via Wikimedia Commons)

3. The shore is publicly-owned for all Rhode Islanders, according to our constitution. The shore in this case goes up to the “mean high water line” although there’s a debate about that. In short, in RI, you can’t own the ocean.

scarborough beach
It’s a constitutional right in RI to gather seaweed from the shore. (via RI Dept. of Parks and Recreation)

4. One of our governors invented sideburns. They’re named after him. But backwards.

Ambrose Burnside
Ambrose Burnside. You wish you had those sideburns. (via Wikimedia Commons)

5. Pell Grants are named after Sen. Claiborne Pell, who was the primary sponsor in the U.S. Senate. So millions of Americans can read BuzzFeed articles like Mini USA’s about RI and go “do they not know what ‘awesome’ means?” thanks to Sen. Pell.

Claiborne Pell
JFK once called him the least electable man in America. Pell won six elections and served for 36 years. (via Wikimedia Commons)

6. The RI State House has the fourth largest self-supporting dome in the whole world; after St. Peter’s Basilica, the Minnesota State Capitol, and the Taj Mahal.* The dome was the third largest when it was completed, but by then, Minnesota had already got jealous.

RI State House (north facade)
You might remember it from the movie Amistad; it played the U.S. Capitol. A building of many talents. (via Wikimedia Commons)

7. We have the First Baptist Church in America. Like, it’s literally the first. So you can go to your first Baptist church in wherever you live in not-Rhode Island, and while it might be the first in your area, it’s not The First. Also, first synagogue in America as well.

Providence First Baptist Church
(via Wikimedia Commons)

8. Thomas Dorr, the guy who led a rebellion against our actual government? We count him as our 16th governor. He’s even got a special governor decoration on his grave.

Thomas W Dorr
Try to do what he did, and see if they call you Governor after. (via Wikimedia Commons)

9. Rhode Island and Providence Plantations isn’t just a quirky, longest name for a state. It also describes the first two areas under British rule in the state. Rhode Island (now called Aquidneck Island to distinguish it; yes, Rhode Island is an island) and Providence Plantations (now a number of towns and cities in the northern part of the state). For a long time, we couldn’t agree on a capital, and just swapped it between the two places, until 1901.

Aquidneck Island
That’s the official “Rhode Island” in red. Whether it’s named after the Isle of Rhodes is debatable. (via Wikimedia Commons)

10. Rhode Islanders burned a British warship and shot one of its officers in 1772, over a year and a half before Bostonians were inspired to toss tea into harbors.

Gaspee Affair
Now that is an act of war. (via Wikimedia Commons)

11. If you confuse Rhode Island with Long Island, a good Rhode Islander will ruthlessly lead you on as though Long Island is a new state. Virtually every Rhode Islander has a story like this.

Confused Guy
Yeah, I’ve had this look before. (via Wikimedia Commons)

 

 

*EDITS: An earlier version forgot about Dave’s Coffee Syrup, and incorrectly stated that there were only two brands of coffee syrup. Thanks to Kathy DiPina for the catch! And RI Grad also points out that I wrote unsupported instead of self-supported.

Smiley to ‘seriously explore’ running for mayor


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Brett SmileyProvidence voters will probably have a progressive to elect mayor in 2014 even if Angel Taveras runs for higher office as Brett Smiley says he’s put together a high-powered committee to “seriously explore” running for mayor if Taveras doesn’t.

“I love Providence and know first-hand the positive impact a passionate and committed mayor can have on the city and its residents,” Smiley said in a statement released today. “I believe I bring the business background, broad community involvement, ideas and energy needed to get this big job done.”

Helping Smiley assess the situation will be Myrth York, perhaps the most important progressive in the Ocean State in terms of competing in a hotly contested election, and Lauren Nocera, who managed Taveras’ successful run for mayor. They are joined by Christine West, chair of the Providence City Plan Commission.

“York is an East Side resident and West a West Side one,” points out the press release.

“I have worked closely with Brett Smiley and I know he has the management skills, temperament, and work ethic that will serve him and the residents of Providence well as Mayor,” York said.

“Brett Smiley has the strong commitment to fostering entrepreneurship and innovative development that is key to revitalizing Providence’s economy and improving our quality of life,” said West.

Smiley is a professional political consultant who also chairs the Providence Water Authority. He’s worked on important progressive issues such as marriage equality and payday loan reform.


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387