POTUS candidate Jill Stein to visit RI in August


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Jill_Stein_432For those who want a female president, the easiest vote is for Hillary Clinton. For those who someone to the left of Hillary Clinton, there’s Bernie Sanders. And for those who want a female president and someone to the left of Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, there’s Jill Stein, Green Party candidate for president.

Stein, a doctor from Massachusetts and the Green Party’s standard bearer for the second election in a row, will visit the CCRI campus in Warwick on Saturday, August 22. She’s the keynote speaker at the Green Gathering, an annual meeting of local Green Party members and supporters.

Unlike even Sanders, Stein offers a real alternative to mainstream political candidates. She endorses a $15 federal minimum wage, ending poverty by creating a job for everyone through a “Green New Deal.” And she’s been critical of campaigns like Sanders’ which seeks to change the party from within.

“What Bernie is doing, speaking truth to power, is a wonderful thing,” Stein said, according to ThinkProgress in June. “It’s been done many times before within the Democratic Party. But one only has to look at the inspired campaign of Jesse Jackson to see where that goes. It’s a wonderful flourish, but when it’s over, it’s over. And the party continues to march to the right. These reform efforts within the Democratic Party feel good for those who participate, but at the end of the day, they have not built a foundation for the future.”

Stein will be joined by Sherrie Anne Andre, one of the FANG activists who have been fighting the expansion of methane gas in Rhode Island and David Fisher, a former Green Party candidate for mayor of Woonsocket, who will speak about local elections.

Here are the details of the Green Gathering, from Greg Gerritt:

2015 GREEN GATHERING, RHODE ISLAND

Saturday, August 22, 2015
11:00 AM – 2:00 PM
at the Community College of Rhode Island (Warwick) – Alumni Room

• Green Presidential Candidate Dr. Jill Stein will be Keynote Speaker
• Preview of Presidential, Legislative, Congressional Campaigns
• Guest speakers from the U.S., Canada, and Northern Ireland
• Workshops on Direct Action, LNG Resistance, and PawSox Stadium

WARWICK, RI – On Saturday, August 22, Rhode Island’s Green Party will host “Green Gathering 2015,” featuring guest speakers from the U.S., Canada, and Northern Ireland. Dr. Jill Stein, the Green Party candidate for U.S. president, will be keynote speaker. Sherrie Anne Andre, the environmental activist who protested the Burrillville compressor station with a tree-sit—and was promptly arrested—will address the Gathering, as will 2013 Woonsocket mayoral candidate Dave Fisher. The complete roster of speakers includes:

JILL STEIN, Presidential Candidate, Green Party of the United States

SHERRIE ANNE ANDRE, FANG-Fighting Against Natural Gas
“Climate Crisis, Direct Action, and the Greens”

DAVE FISHER, WPRO Radio Host, 2013 Green Candidate for Woonsocket Mayor
“The Power of Local Elections”

JOHN BARRY, Green Party of Northern Ireland (via Skype from Belfast)
“Greens Against Fracking in the UK and Ireland”

JEAN CLOUTIER, Green Party of Quebec (via Skype from Québec City)
“Green Energy in Canadian Politics”

International Speakers. Joining the Gathering via Skype, European Green Party leader John Barry of Belfast, Northern Ireland, and Canadian Green Party leader Jean Cloutier of Quebec City will report on latest developments in the struggle to end fracking and fossil fuel drilling in Canada and Europe.

Green Party policy and strategy will be the subject of two workshops, on “Global Warming & Nonviolent Direct Action in Rhode Island,” and “LNG Resistance, the PawSox Stadium, and Green Campaigns in 2016.”
Free on-site child care will be available for children under 10, provided by Imagine Preschool (CCRI’s day care center). This is a brown-bag friendly event; bring your own lunch! The Green Gathering is free and open to the public.

Activists arrested in Burrillville for protesting gas expansion project


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Peter NightingalePolice arrested two environmental activists arrested this morning who were protesting a methane gas pipeline project in Burrillville, Rhode Island, by chaining themselves to a gate at the project site.

Peter Nightingale, a University of Rhode Island physics professor and occasional RI Future contributor, and Curt Nordgaard, a pediatrician from Massachusetts, were both arrested according to Fighting Against Natural Gas, of FANG, the grassroots group of activists who have been calling attention to the Algonquin pipeline project that would cut through northern Rhode Island.

“I’m taking action today because as a parent and a being pediatrician compels me to use any and all nonviolent means to stop this project,” said Nordgaard in a prepared statement.

Journalist Steve Ahlquist was on the scene and recorded the direct action and subsequent arrests:

This is the latest in increasingly disruptive tactics by FANG to raise awareness of the negative environmental impacts associated with continued investments in fossil fuels like methane gas, which is often captured through fracking. A tree sitter was removed from a stand by police in July and Nightingale was arrested in December for refusing to leave Senator Sheldon Whitehouse’s office because the climate change champion would not speak against the pipeline project. FANG has also held more traditional protest events.

“We will keep taking action until these projects are stopped” Nightingale said in a statement.

FANGDSC_8170DSC_8148DSC_7841DSC_7684DSC_7676DSC_7675DSC_7653

Larry Lucchino’s losing record in San Diego


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Lee_soxlarry4_spts.r
PawSox owner Larry Lucchino.

Last week when I sat down to talk with Dan Yorke, one point he brought up was that stadium opponents have their hands tied until Speaker Mattiello releases the terms of the new deal he is working with the PawSox ownership. I agree with that, but with one caveat: there is always the paper trail to indicate what direction things are going in. Larry Lucchino is a veteran player in the baseball stadium construction game, so the idea he might deviate from a long line of tricks and tropes is highly dubious.

The current word from Speaker Mattiello’s office is that this will be a ‘revenue-neutral’ or ‘revenue-positive’ deal, a very slippery set of words. But Arlene Violet hammers it home in a piece for The Valley Breeze:

[T]he taxpayer is now being serenaded by the House Speaker with a sweet tune that any proposal would have to be “revenue neutral.” It’s a great soundbite but devoid of reality. In their book “The Field of Schemes,” authors Neil de Mause and Joanna Cagan expose this ploy and the steps taken as the project unfolds to shift costs and risks to the public while the rich welfare recipients turn the public money into private profit.

That does not bode well for Messrs Lucchino and Mattiello. But if one looks into Petco Park, one of the highly-touted ‘success’ stories on Lucchino’s resume, a site that Dr. Steinberg consistently cited in his Listening Tour presentations, the prognosis is dire. While affiliated with the San Diego Padres in the late 1990’s, Lucchino was able to push through a deal that was funded by publicly-approved bonds, Proposition C, called a ‘public-private partnership’ back then also. However, due to both a budget crunch and fiscal restructuring under California state law, the taxpayers were left on the hook facing a debt of up to $271 million. And it appears that Lucchino has not changed his tune over the past two decades. If one visits another story from the San Diego Reader titled CHARGERS: LOOK AT PETCO PARK FAILURE (how encouraging!), the comments section is illuminating.

Oh, the lies that were told in that 1998 election! The ballpark was to be revenue neutral; hotel tax receipts would service the bonds. Bureaucrats later admitted to a grand jury that they had been pressured to jiggle those numbers to make it look like TOT revenues would service the bonds. [Emphasis added]

In fact, as this slideshow presentation for the book PARADISE PLUNDERED: FISCAL CRISIS AND GOVERNANCE FAILURES IN SAN DIEGO (sounds cheery!), Petco Park not only failed to be ‘revenue-neutral’, it contributed in no small fashion to a major fiscal emergency for the city, resulting in austerity measures and cuts to pensions and public services. And considering Rhode Island has already done those things, one is left with only morbid fantasies to explain what might be offered up next. Will we put state heirlooms on the auction block or perhaps cut to the chase and sell the children into debt bondage?

kaGh5_patreon_name_and_message

Raimondo tours East Providence screen-printing shop, talks jobs plan


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Nelson Silva, the owner of Graphic Ink, a screen-printing and embroidery shop in East Providence, likes to joke that he normally works half days- 6 am to 6 pm. That’s what he told Governor Gina Raimondo Wednesday afternoon when she toured Graphic Ink in an effort to spread information about her different economic initiatives, and how they would help small businesses like Silva’s.

Nelson Silva shows Gov. Raimondo, Lieutenant Gov. McKee, and Sec. Pryor shirts made by his staff.
Nelson Silva shows Gov. Raimondo, Lieutenant Gov. McKee, and Sec. Pryor shirts made by his staff.

“This business, [with] 17, 18 employees, this is the lifeblood of Rhode Island’s economy. Most Rhode Islanders work for companies just like this, [with] 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 employees,” Raimondo said. “So, as governor, I am very focused on making it easier to do business, less expensive to do business.”

Some of the initiatives that Raimondo spoke about were big parts of the state budget, like the elimination of the sales tax on energy for businesses, as well as decreasing the corporate minimum tax from $500 to $450. Raimondo also took the time to highlight other parts of her jobs plan, such as the streetscape improvement fund, a small business assistance program run by the Commerce Corporation, and a program for “innovation vouchers.”

“Think of it as a coupon,” Raimondo said. “You can come to the Commerce Corporation, get a coupon, and then redeem your coupon at one of our local universities to get access to R&D. If you have a new technology you want to investigate, if you’re a healthcare company, if one of your clients is a healthcare company, a lot of the times they want access to a research team at URI or Brown or RISD or Johnson & Wales. Get the coupon from the Commerce Corporation, check it in with the university, and have special access. We’re trying to promote more innovation.”

Silva, who has owned and operated Graphic Ink since 1997, said that he was very excited for the governor to come visit his shop, and expressed support for her jobs plan.

“I think her plan that she’s launching is right on point with where small businesses need to be, and small businesses are the backbone of the state in my opinion,” Silva said. “It’s very exciting to hear that she is really encouraging to support small businesses.”

Silva said initiatives like the energy sales tax elimination and the roadside improvements continue to make it easier for his business, and businesses like his, to keep employing people, and therefore invest in the local community. He even said that he believes that, because the state is on an economic upturn, that Rhode Islanders are more likely to invest in small businesses.

Graphic Ink in East Providence, RI.
Graphic Ink in East Providence, RI.

“I believe she has recharged the state in a way that, there are many people, companies, organizations, colleges, that have a lot of activity going on. We are an event-based business. We produce things for events. There are lots of things going on, which in turn makes us a busy shop,” he said.

According to Silva, this increase in activity, and reinvestment in small businesses, has opened up a lot of jobs in the community, which is looking for skilled workers. In his opinion, now that the economy is beginning to heal, the next logical step is to work on getting vocational education programs out there for students to become trained laborers right out of high school, or in college. Silva said that he is always willing to train an employee on site, but some positions do require skilled labor, such as graphics or design.

With all of these changes, Silva envisions a bright future for small businesses in Rhode Island.

“I see small business, in my case, [becoming] stronger and stronger, as the owners and employees are willing to put some effort into it. As long as we put some effort into it and work hard, hard work pays off.”

Elorza’s priorities: alarmed East Siders or the housing crisis


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Elorza 003As I watch news of Providence Mayor Jorge Elorza’s administration, I see more and more of what many feared during the campaign: an Elorza–Brett Smiley led administration, beholden to the moneyed, white interests of the East Side, at the expense of the rest of the city. Today in the Providence Journal, there was front-page coverage of a meeting at Nathan Bishop Middle School on the East Side, where residents expressed “alarm” at an alleged wave of home break-ins in their neighborhood.

Certainly break-ins are never a good thing, on any side of town. But the mayor said “One Providence,” not two.

The swift response from the mayor, police, and media to these mostly white, relatively affluent city dwellers highlights the opposite experience of Southside community organizations, residents, and organizers seeking the mayor’s audience for their issues. At the sounds of alarm raised by those on the East Side, Mayor Elorza rushed to a community meeting and brought along high-ranking police officials. All this despite police statistics (cited in the Projo article) demonstrating a decrease in reported break-ins on the East Side since last year. The Providence Journal followed close behind and gave the meeting front-page coverage! This comes a day after I received an email from the administration, announcing the new “Center for City Services,” based on the pledge that “everyone who lives, works, owns a business, and goes to school in Providence deserves the highest quality city services.” “Everyone,” not just the politically palatable or otherwise privileged.

The Tenant and Homeowner Association (THA), a group of working-class homeowners and renters from across Providence, predominantly people of color, who are organized to prevent foreclosure, evictions, and the abandonment of their neighborhoods, have been raising the “alarm” about the city’s hundreds of abandoned properties for months, and have yet to receive face time with the mayor.

In fact, a formal request for a meeting was met with months of silence, and only after further prodding finally received the answer from a staffer that the mayor was simply “too busy,” to meet on this issue. Yet, these East Side residents, alarmed at break-ins that have not, in fact, increased, receive the mayor’s immediate presence in their neighborhood, along with city resources in the form of eager police commanders. While break-ins appear a bit of a straw man, abandoned properties, by the mayor’s own admission, are a serious problem for the city, though not on the East Side. Hundreds of properties sit empty, inviting arson, blighting neighborhoods, and dragging down property values for those homeowners, predominantly people of color, who have managed to hang on to their homes amidst foreclosures and structural unemployment.

The mayor’s reluctance to meet with a group of affected residents, who have actually been organizing themselves around an issue for years (the last six of which were spent changing state law to protect vulnerable renters from eviction), is unacceptable. Suspicions about his priorities and the sincerity of “One Providence,” are legitimized by his earnest response to East Side residents, who are unorganized and whose “alarm” is rooted in race and class-based fear.

Instead of assuaging the fears of East Siders, perhaps the mayor should prioritize the basic needs of the many residents in the rest of Providence, whose resistance to never-ending poverty, divestment, blight, and disenfranchisement are rooted in real problems, like abandoned properties, to which the mayor himself offered lip service in the pursuit of votes.

RI workers to Wood Partners: Pay us our wages!


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
IMG_3700
Delivering the “citation”

Workers from Rhode Island and Massachusetts visited the Alta Stone Apartments in Melrose, developed and owned by Wood Partners, to demand payment for $34,000 worth of work done on the apartments at 72 Stone Place and 1000 Stone Place between July and October 2014. According to Fuerza Laboral, these workers were employed by a subcontractor hired by Wood Partners. As part of their demonstration workers delivered a “citation” calling on Wood Partners to pay workers their stolen wages.

According to Fuerza Laboral organizer Phoebe Gardener, “When workers formally brought complaints to the subcontractor for their unpaid wages in April 2015, Wood Partners denied all claims. Ten workers have submitted wage theft complaints with the Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office. Since the subcontractor has refused to pay and Wood was the ultimate beneficiary of the work performed, workers are holding Wood directly accountable for their unpaid wages.”

IMG_3714“They owed us money every week and didn’t pay us at all the last two weeks of work,” said Gianni Batres in a statement. Batres worked as a drywaller at the Alta Stone Place apartments. “This isn’t fair for workers. Wood Partners needs to be ultimately responsible for making sure that the workers who are hired by their contractors and subcontractors get paid.”

The workers previously demonstrated at the Hanover Development worksite at University Station in Westwood back in April.

Fuerza Laboral, along with sister organization Metrowest Worker Center, the Immigrant Worker Center Collaborative, Massachusetts Community Labor United, the Greater Boston Labor Council and other community and labor partners, “are working in more intentional ways to build campaigns around holding builders responsible for the working conditions of subcontracted workers,” says Gardener.

IMG_3706Gardener added that small subcontractors can easily change names or leave the state. Many builders use contractors and subcontractors that are based out of state to begin with, which means workers would have to travel out of state and deal with out of state agencies to recover their wages. Even if the court or the state decides that the subcontractor owes workers money, it can be hard to recover if the subcontractor moves or has no assets. When workers have tried to bring these labor rights violations to the general contractor, they are told that the general contractor is not responsible because the workers are not direct employees.

[This report is compiled from a press release and email correspondence with Phoebe Gardener.]

Patreon

Judge Licht allows medical marijuana discrimination case to move forward


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Photo courtesy of http://marijuanaindustrygroup.org/
Photo courtesy of http://marijuanaindustrygroup.org/

Rhode Island Superior Court Judge Richard Licht refused to dismiss a case in which a University of Rhode Island graduate student alleged that she was denied employment due to her status as a medical marijuana user.

The case, which was filed by the American Civil Liberties Union in November of 2014, concerns URI grad student Christine Callaghan, who is working towards a masters’ degree in textiles. Callaghan is also a registered medical marijuana user in order to deal with frequent migraine headaches. In July of last year, Callaghan was slated to begin a paid internship with Darlington Fabrics in Westerly, which she needed to finish her degree. After disclosing her status as a medical marijuana user, the company withdrew her internship.

In the lawsuit, the ACLU argues that Darlington has violated the Hawkins Slater Medical Marijuana Act. Callaghan’s attorney, Carly Beauvais Iafrate, said that because the company had no other reason to withdraw their offer from Callaghan, they are breaking the law.

“Under the Hawkins Slater Medical Marijuana Act, when the General Assembly put that really critical employment language in, which essentially says that no person will be not hired or denied any privileged in employment because of their cardholder status,” she said. “They didn’t then put any language in there that says if someone violates that section, you can sue them. That’s called a private right of action. So what [Darlington’s lawyer] was saying was there’s nothing in the statute that says you can sue anybody over it, and so therefore, you shouldn’t be allowed to.”

Iafrate said the defendant’s argument relies on what is normally written into other disability laws, that lay out penalties for those who violate the law, be it a fine or the right to sue. The Hawkins Slater Medical Marijuana Act lacks that language. In other situations, the Rhode Island Supreme Court has not assigned a remedy and implied a private right of action, but Iafrate says that this case is different from the precedent that has already been set.

“Those other situations are different, because in this statute, the General Assembly said liberally construe this to make sure that the purpose is effectuated, so that it doesn’t become meaningless,” she said. “Think about it. If there’s no remedy, what meaning does it have that they say that no employer can refuse to hire? They can just do it anyway, because there’s no remedy.”

The ACLU is also arguing that by refusing to hire Callaghan, Darlington has discriminated against a disabled person, and is in violation of the Rhode Island Civil Rights Act.

Licht did not approve Darlington’s motion to dismiss for a number of reasons, but his biggest reason dealt with the Medical Marijuana Act, and Darlington’s argument that there is no private right of action, and that they should be allowed to not hire Callaghan to ensure a drug free workplace.

“It’s inconceivable to me that the General Assembly meant to say discriminate against for the use of marijuana, even though you can’t discriminate against them because they hold a card that allows them to use it,” Licht said. “I doubt there are many people who sought out a medical marijuana card that don’t use it.”

While Callaghan is seeking compensatory and punitive damages, Iafrate said she had other reasons to sue as well.

“One of her main purposes, which is why she went to the ACLU, is because this is an important issue, and it needs to be decided. People who are engaging in the medical use of marijuana in the state need to know whether they have employment protection or not. And they need to know whether it’s just words on paper or if it actually means something,” Iafrate said.

In a press release from the ACLU, Callaghan said that she would like companies to treat medical marijuana patients just as they would any other employee who may take medication for a chronic illness.

The next step is for the case to go to summary judgment and for both parties to engage in discovery of evidence and facts. Iafrate said this should happen within the next year.

Raimondo ends school construction moratorium


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
GilbertStuart
What some Rhode Island schools look like. Gilbert Stuart Middle School in Providence.

No ground has been broken yet, but it can now be said that the much-maligned moratorium on school construction is officially over.

Governor Gina Raimondo today launched the new School Building Authority Capital Fund, a $20 million line item in the 2016 budget that will go to fixing Rhode Island’s aging and too often decrepit school buildings.

“We know our kids can’t learn in crumbling school buildings and that they must have access to a learning environment that inspires them to do their best,” said Raimondo according to a press release. “Today, we are hitting our school building challenges head on. With this plan, kids and teachers will get better schools and our construction crews will get back to work.”

Following a news conference, superintendents and other public school officials attended a workshop on how to apply for the new funds. Applications are due September 10, said education department spokesman Elliot Krieger. Then RIDE will begin the process of awarding the money for local school construction projects.

“For so many Rhode Islanders, success starts in the classroom, and it is my priority to make those classrooms the safe, creative, and challenging learning environments our kids deserve,” said state Education Commissioner Ken Wagner. “We are fortunate to have leaders who understand that investments in education are an investment in our future.”

Since 2011 there has been a moratorium on school construction in Rhode Island. Social justice and education activists blamed the lack of investment as a contributing factor to the education gap, and construction workers said the moratorium stood in the way of good jobs building positive additions to the community.

This year, RI Future and NBC 10, among others, have published pictures and accounts of the sub-par sometimes even dangerous conditions of urban schools. Aaron Apps called it a “kind of slow, horrible violence being done against the students and teachers expected to occupy these buildings.” The Providence Student Union held a high profile rally in March to lobby state officials to lift the moratorium. Raimondo proposed lifting the moratorium and establishing the $20 million account in her budget, ad the idea was left in by the state legislature.

Dan Lawlor has said Raimondo’s proposal is inferior to the model used in Massachusetts.

Air quality benefits outweigh fracked gas facility


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

BoyceThe economic benefits from doing away with the burning of fossil fuels (including fracked gas) are tremendous in terms of “Air Quality Co-Benefits,” said James K. Boyce  at the closing lecture at the Center for Popular Economics 2015 Summer Institute: Confronting Capitalism & Climate Crisis. “Add up those benefits” says Boyce, and you’ll find that the public health benefits are often twice the “social cost of carbon” which is the federal government’s measure of the benefits of reducing CO2 emissions.

Boyce is is a professor of economics at UMass Amherst researching development economics and environmental economics, with particular interests in the impacts of inequalities of wealth and power and the dynamics of conflict. His talk provided yet more reasons to oppose the construction of Clear River Energy Center, a fracked gas energy plant in Burrillville, Rhode Island.

The “vested interests of those who claim to own fossil fuels in the ground” says Boyce, “prevent good climate policy” from being enacted in the United States. It is not possible to design a strategy that can both prevent catastrophic climate change and appease the fossil fuel industry. (As Noel Healy said at a previous CPE talk, “There is no fixable flaw in the fossil fuel industry business plan. We are asking a company to go out of business.”)

But it is possible, stresses Boyce, “to design climate policies that do not impose costs but are beneficial in terms of public health and incomes.” These strategies, if instituted by the United States, would not put us at an economic disadvantage, but would have immediate economic benefits.

20,000 people die every year as a result of air pollution in the form of particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and benzene. The health impacts include asthma, impeded brain development, stroke and cardio-vascular disease, among many more. Treating these diseases costs money. Add to that the value of a statistical life, that grubby little number insurance companies have determined we are each worth, (about $7 million,) and therefore the costs to society of preventible death, diseases and conditions due to fossil fuel emissions is vast.

Another aspect of Boyce’s talk concerned the placement of fossil fuel burning plants. It is not true that carbon is carbon and that it doesn’t matter where in the world they are eliminated. “Co-pollutants are localized and specific communities are influenced by these pollutants.”

Kathy Martley (BASE)

Again, this can be applied to Burrillville and the proposed fracked gas plant. Before the new fracked gas plant was proposed, Burrillville was facing a huge expansion of the natural gas pipeline. Back in February I listened to Kathy Martley from BASE (Burrillville Against Spectra Expansion) say, “Burrillville is Rhode Island’s sacrifice zone.”

Martley is also concerned about the chemicals the pumping station is using. Fracked gas is dirtier, she says, and requires an additional 25 chemical additives to make it run smoothly through the pipeline. Many of these chemicals are industrial secrets, meaning there is no information available to the public as to what they are. In the event of a leak, Martley and her family and neighbors may be exposed to an unknown toxic brew. These concerns are no doubt exasperated with the addition of a new fracked gas burning plant.

This is no idle concern of a local resident crying NIMBY. Ted Nesi reports that Senator Sheldon Whitehouse is undecided on the matter. Hisspokesman Seth Larson said, “The senator has significant concerns about methane leaks during natural gas production and elsewhere in the supply chain and has been urging EPA to pin down the size of the problem and take action to address it.”

This jibes with a report from the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) that conludes that while “the global warming emissions from [fracked gas] combustion are much lower than those from coal or oil… Emissions from smokestacks and tailpipes… do not tell the full story.”

“The drilling and extraction of natural gas from wells and its transportation in pipelines,” says the UCS, “results in the leakage of methane, a far more potent global warming gas than CO2.” And though fracked gas burning plants yield lower emissions than coal or oil, “Some areas where drilling occurs have experienced increases in concentrations of hazardous air pollutants and two of the six “criteria pollutants” — particulate matter and ozone plus its precursors — regulated by the EPA because of their harmful effects on health and the environment.”

Rhode Island has to decide if it is moral, given that there are clean energy solution available that do not rely on fossil fuels, to outsource our pollution and attendant health risks to those distant fields where desperate communities allow fracking. We have to decide if it is moral to make Burrillville, RI into a sacrifice zone, where, long after natural gas has gone away and the Earth endures a 4 or 5 degree temperature increase due to our continued reliance on apocalyptic technology, we will be leaving a toxic Superfund site to the next generation.

In the video below you can watch nearly the entirety of Boyce’s talk, where besides speaking about the health risks of fossil fuels and the economic advantages of avoiding them, he also outlines his “cap and dividend” approach to carbon reduction.

Patreon

RI delegation noncommittal on Iran deal


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

iranThe lines are drawn on a proposed nuclear containment deal with Iran. President Obama and “peace-loving” progressives are united in support while the GOP is unsurprisingly against it. Stuck in the middle are the American people and congressional Democrats.

A new poll from Monmouth State University released Monday shows 41 percent of respondents are unsure if the deal should be inked while 32 percent think lawmakers should not support it and 27 percent think they should. And according to The Hill, 35 House Democrats support the deal and 29 are undecided while 18 Senate Democrats support and 20 are undecided.

The Rhode Island congressional delegation is on the fence, too.

“Congressman Langevin continues to review the agreement and consider the options in advance of Congressional action this fall,” said his spokeswoman Meg Geoghegan. “He has not yet made a final decision on how he will vote on the issue.” Rich Luchette, a spokesman for Congressman David Cicilline said simply, “Congressman Cicilline is reviewing the proposed agreement.”

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse “hasn’t announced a position on the Iran deal yet,” according to spokesman Seth Larson. And Chip Unruh, spokesman for Senator Jack Reed, said the ranking member of the RI delegation, and a nationally-regarded foreign policy expert, “continues to thoroughly review.”

As a ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Reed has been conducting hearings on the issue with Arizona Sen. John McCain. The Hill lists Reed in the yes column but RIPR coverage from July 16 says Reed “has not decided whether he supports President Barack Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran.” Unruh said The Hill “must be speculating.”

Speculation or not, The Hill lists noted progressive leaders Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders as supporting the deal.

This agreement is obviously not all that many of us would have liked but it beats the alternative – a war with Iran that could go on for years,” Sanders said, according to The Hill. And quoting her from the Boston Globe, Elizabeth Warren has said, “The question now before Congress — the only question before Congress — is whether the recently announced nuclear agreement represents our best available option for preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. I am convinced that it does.”

Progressives have largely supported the deal with Code Pink calling it “a great victory for peace-loving people around the world.” The New York Times has a 200 word summary of the deal.

SEIU, Raimondo reach agreement to improve early childhood education

Last week, Governor Gina Raimondo and SEIU District 1199 New England reached an agreement concerning family childcare providers that are part of the state’s Child Care Assistance Program. This agreement was made in part due to legislation from 2013, which established collective bargaining rights for family childcare providers. The SEIU unanimously approved the two-year agreement.

Photo courtesy of http://www.seiu1199ne.org/1199-history/
Photo courtesy of http://www.seiu1199ne.org/1199-history/

One of the largest parts of the agreement is a $250,000 investment by the state to establish a jointly administered training and professional development fund. This program will help to improve the quality of care and early learning delivered by care providers. Those who are part of CCAP will also receive their first reimbursement rate increase since 2008.

“We have taken a big step forward in making it easier for working parents to find quality child care options in their communities that meet their work schedules,” SEIU District 1199NE Executive Vice President Patrick Quinn said. “All workers deserve a living wage and this historic agreement shows that Rhode Island is ready to recognize and live up to the value of the important work of our early educators.”

RI KIDS COUNT data shows that more than 70 percent of Rhode Island children under the age of six have parents who work, and are in child care at least part time. The Department of Human Services also reported that CCAP served approximately 5,800 families and 9,400 families in July 2015.

“Investing in our kids, and the systems that care of them, is essential to ensure everyone has an opportunity to make it in Rhode Island,” Governor Raimondo said. “Providing quality, affordable child care removes a critical barrier to getting and keeping a job for many of our hardworking families, improves the development of our kids and prepares them for success in the classroom. I am pleased that we have reach an agreement with SEIU to enhance our commitment to high quality child care and support working families.”

Michiko Kodama on the bombing of Hiroshima


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

DSC_5683Rhode Island is the last state in the nation to celebrate Victory Day, or the Japanese surrender to America after we dropped two atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Most of the world recognizes these events as not reason to celebrate victory but rather an opportunity to remember that humans now have the technology to destroy the planet.

Michiko Kodama, of Hiroshima, was seven years old when it happened. Below are the words she shared recently with the Southeast New England Chapter of the American Friends Service Committee.

I am a Hibakusha, a victim of the first nuclear war in history; the atomic-bomb attack was made on Hiroshima in 1945.  At that time, I was 7 years old, a second grader in primary school.

At 8:15 am on August 6, 1945, I was inside the wooden school building.  Suddenly I felt a blinding flash.  The next moment, the ceiling of the building collapsed and sharp splinters of windowpanes flew all around.  They stuck into the walls, desks and the floor of the classroom, and also into my skin.  I fell unconscious and don’t remember how much time passed before I came to my senses.

My father managed to come to the school to find me.  On my way home, carried on my father’s back, I witnessed hell on earth.  I saw a man with his skin burned heavily and peeled.  A mother was carrying a baby, which was burned-black and looked like charcoal.  She herself was heavily burned all over her body and was trying to flee from the place, almost crawling on the ground.

Others lost their sight, their eyeballs popped out, or ran around trying to escape, while holding their protruding intestines in their hands.  More and more people tried to cling on to us, saying, “Give me water, water, water…”  Unable to give any kind of help to them, we just left them there and hurried home.

When I arrived home 3.5 kilometers from the blast center, I found the roof of the house blown away by the blast and fragments of glass scattered all around.  The “Black Rain,” containing large amount of radiation, fell into the house, and traces of the “Black Rain” on the wall remained for a long time.

My favorite cousin, who was like a big sister for me, had been mobilized to work around the area 500 meters from the blast center when the bomb exploded.  While half of her face, her entire back and her right leg were severely burned, sore and raw, she escaped to my home.  Her burns quickly festered and flies swarmed.  Soon maggots bred and crawled around over her body.  All I could do for my beloved cousin was to pick these maggots out and wipe her oozing body.  I remember that on the morning of the third day — probably it was August 9th — she breathed her last in my arms.  She was 14 years old.

Another cousin, who was 10 years old, was suffering from diarrhea, although he had no injuries or burns.  One day he began to bleed from his ears and nose, vomited blood clots from his mouth and died suddenly.  One after the other, several of my uncles and aunts followed my cousins within a matter of month.

The atomic bomb continued to afflict me in my later life.  Whenever I tried to get a job or get married, I suffered from prejudice and discrimination just because I was a Hibakusha.  When I became pregnant, I was tremendously worried, wondering if I would give birth to a baby who would be seen as a Hibakusha’s child.  Around that period, many Hibakusha suffered repeated stillbirths and miscarriages, or lost their children prematurely due to illness. Hiroshima aftermath via Wikimedia Commons

It is most painful for me now to speak about my daughter.  She was suddenly taken with cancer.  She made a tearful and difficult decision to take a major operation, believing that it would make her healthy again.  After the 13-hour operation, in fear of the recurrence or metastasis of cancer, she was going through the treatment and rehabilitation, despite great physical and mental pains. But she died abruptly, only 4 months after she was first diagnosed.

When I got pregnant with her, after much wavering over the possible radiation effect on the baby, I finally decided to give birth to her.  So her death 4-and-a-half years ago has given me deep sorrow and vexation.  I really miss her and my desire to hear her voice and want to hug her in my arms.

It is still not proven whether a second generation Hibakusha are more likely to suffer cancer or not.  But it is clear that radiation would affect the human genes, which is a cause for big anxiety among second and third generation Hibakusha.

The aftereffects of the atomic bomb continue to bring hardships to the survivors across the board throughout their lives, physically, mentally and in their living conditions, after even 70 years. Such experiences as ours should never be inflicted on any of you, nor on anyone in the world.

Out of our own experiences, the Hibakusha know that nuclear bombs would cause untold damage to human beings if they would ever be used again whether on purpose or by accident.

We urge world leaders, especially of the nuclear-armed states, to come to Hiroshima and Nagasaki and witness directly the atrocity committed on these two cities.  They believe it necessary to maintain nuclear weapons in the name of nuclear deterrence.  But deterrence is based on the probability of actual use of these weapons.  Hibakusha absolutely cannot accept either the threat or any probability of the use of nuclear weapons.  They are weapons of the devil which cannot coexist with humans.

The mere existence of nuclear weapons on this planet is not acceptable from the humanitarian point of view.

Ever since its founding in 1956, for more than half a century, Nihon Hidankyo (The Japan Confederation of A- & H-Bomb Sufferers’ Organizations) has called, “No more Hibakusha” and “Abolish nuclear weapons!” while tearfully sharing their A-bomb experiences with people in Japan and also internationally.  Hibakusha are now very encouraged by the increasing efforts of the people to achieve the abolition of nuclear weapons.  With this support, we are determined to work further to testify and disseminate information about the consequences of the A-bombing to the broader public.

However, the world is still burdened with more than 16,000 nuclear weapons, most of which are possessed by the United States and Russia.

Dear conscientious people of the United States, please try to learn what actually happened under the mushroom cloud, and how atrocious and inhuman was the damage caused by the atomic bombs.  Once you know it, you will understand that nuclear weapons must never be used and should immediately be abolished.

Before the 70th anniversary of the atomic bombing, the international conferences on the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons have been held in Norway, Mexico and Austria.  The Chair’s Summary from the conference in Mexico in 2014, in which 146 countries took part, said, “…the mere existence of these weapons (is) absurd, …and ultimately are contrary to human dignity,” and declared that the time had come for action for abolishing nuclear weapons, and for this we must “reach new international standards and norms, through a legally binding instrument.”

It was really regrettable that the 2015 NPT Review Conference, held in the 70th anniversary year, ended without agreeing on the final document. We the Hibakusha urge the leaders of the nuclear weapons states to listen to the heartfelt appeal of the Hibakusha, calling for “No More Hibakusha”.

We will never give up.  We are witnessing a great surge of international opinion calling for a world free of nuclear weapons.  Over 80% of the members of the United Nations have agreed that it is in the interest of the humanity that nuclear weapons never be used, and that the only guarantee for this will be the abolition of nuclear weapons.

In order to support this move and to make the process move forward, each and every citizen of the civil society should be firmly committed to creating a world free from inhumane nuclear weapons.  I sincerely invite you to step boldly forward together.

Although we the Hibakusha are aged, as long as we breathe, we will continue to appeal for the abolition of nuclear weapons, working in partnership with civil society around the world.

No more Hiroshimas and Nagasakis!  No more Hibakusha.  No more war.

Is it climate change o’clock yet?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
ku-bigpic3
Earth, 2037, map by that radical leftist outfit National Geographic.

Over 30 years ago, activist Larry Kramer, disgusted by the apathy of public officials and the timidity of gay men who refused to come out, wrote a blistering article called 1,112 AND COUNTING.

Kramer was furious at Ronald Reagan, who refused to say the word AIDS, New York Mayor Ed Koch, a closet-case who wouldn’t be seen within a hundred miles of anything remotely to do with homosexuality, the CDC, which was giving pittances to AIDS researchers, and Gay Men’s Health Crisis, a group he had founded and then witnessed descend into a puddle of politically-correct mush. Many historians of the epidemic see Kramer’s dispatch as the moment when people woke up and said that, unless they got into the street and began making noise, there was a real chance AIDS could become the Bubonic Plague.

We need an article like that now for climate change. The first lines of Kramer’s writing read:

If this article doesn’t scare the sh*t out of you, we’re in real trouble. If this article doesn’t rouse you to anger, fury, rage, and action, gay men may have no future on this earth. Our continued existence depends on just how angry you can get… I repeat: Our continued existence as gay men upon the face of this earth is at stake. Unless we fight for our lives, we shall die. In all the history of homosexuality we have never before been so close to death and extinction. Many of us are dying or already dead.

And such is the case with climate change now. I just got my electricity back on yesterday after that freak storm that struck Tuesday morning. I was aware the night before that there was a thunder storm predicted, so I closed my windows. When it hit that morning at 6, my jaw hit the floor and I was terrified. That was not just a storm, it was a catastrophe that happened because of global warming.

I am uncertain if this is a correct diagnosis, and I welcome the critique of a meteorologist, but here’s what I think happened: for weeks now we have been reading about bizarre things like fish washing up on the shores by the hundreds, dead from suffocation and water temperature. I recently heard a climate scientist on NPR talking about how the waters of Cape Cod this season are the warmest he has ever experienced. I think that, when the storm passed over the Narragansett Bay, it sucked up a lot of heat generated by the warm water. Warm air generated by water is like a massive dose of anabolic steroids for weather, it turns normal storms into monstrosities. In 2005, the warm air generated by the Gulf of Mexico smashed into the bottom of Hurricane Katrina and resulted in a regular hurricane transforming New Orleans into a war zone. That’s the same principle I think was at work here.

And yet after we get smashed upside the heads by a gigantic warning to reduce our carbon footprint, people continue to create aforementioned footprint, if not doubling it. Around my neighborhood, the night air was abuzz with the sputtering of gas-powered generators. Others would sit in their running cars to charge their phones and use the air conditioner. When a child touches a hot stove, they get a clue and don’t do it again. But with climate change, we don’t stop touching the stove, we thrust our hands into the white-hot center of the fire!

It’s not like we do not know what to do, there are plenty of examples in Europe, Canada, and California that lead the way. We could increase our number of wind turbines, the government could sponsor a proliferation of solar panels for homes and municipalities, there could be geothermal, hydroelectric, and all sorts of sustainable energy projects that would give high-paying, long-lasting jobs to both white- and blue-collar workers.

To extend the AIDS analogy one step further, Kramer later dramatized his experiences with AIDS in a play, THE NORMAL HEART, which was made into a HBO film last year starring Mark Ruffalo. Ruffalo, a man of deep principles and morals, has created a non-profit, The Solutions Project, where he offers sustainable energy plans for every state. According to his website, Rhode Island has a lot of progress to make. We have a power grid consisting of 4.4% residential solar panels, 17.8% solar PV plants, 10% onshore wind, 0.1% hydroelectric, and 0% geothermal. There would be 7,473 construction jobs and 5,775 operation jobs created by the transition to a sustainable power grid.

And it’s not like there aren’t financial benefits immediately to be seen from installing solar panels on your house. Did you know there is a mechanism you can install so that, in the day, after charging the battery that will power your house during the night, you can feed the excess energy back into the power grid, reducing your electrical bill to almost nothing per month? Teddy Roosevelt was a lot of things, but one of those things was a conservationist and environmentalist. He saw the basic logic of environmentalism not just as a matter of what we leave our progeny but also as a matter of fiscal conservatism and responsibility. He knew that, if you do the right thing and don’t pollute, you end up saving both yourself and the government money. He created the Food and Drug Administration not just so to stop people from eating bad food and taking tainted medicine, he did it to prevent lawsuits against the vendors, a real type of tort reform that these lunatic Tea Partiers would call state socialism!

But what do we get instead? Gina Raimondo opening a power plant operating on fracked natural gas while President Obama’s uber-hyped “clean energy plan” in fact only phases out coal while maintaining natural gas mining! What changed? These politicians are servants of the power companies that fund their campaigns. They do not care. Get over the delusion that the Dismal Dollar Democrats are serious about climate issues, they aren’t. I voted not twice but three times for President Obama, first in the primary contest against Hillary Clinton and then in both the 2008 and 2012 general elections. I had deep-seated hopes for him as both the first African-American president and as someone who said he was going to change Washington.

But instead, he has been a Clinton Democrat who has defenestrated environmental laws and allowed our fossil fuel fanaticism to fester unchallenged. He could have passed an executive order any day of the week to stop fracking. But instead, his appointees at the Environmental Protection Agency recently issued a piece of quackery about how fracking does not affect drinking water, flying in the face of a consensus that the chemicals used in that horrid process are carcinogens! Richard Nixon was a monster responsible for despicable crimes, but he would seem like a flaming liberal, if not an outright Red, when comparing his policies on pollution with the pack of lunatics at the helm now.

If we don’t get this thing under control not very soon but now, we are going to all suffer terrible consequences. The polar ice melt, already in process, is going to raise the sea level so drastically that by 2037 Rhode Island, if it still exists at all, will be a string of hilltop islands peaking out of the water, with Providence either totally submerged or functioning in a method not unlike Venice. The Ocean State will have a year-round temperature akin to Georgia. And the midwest, our breadbasket and source of most of the food on our tables, is going to be a desert not unlike the Sahara! These days we rue how our grain silos store surpluses of grain and corn that could feed the hungry, but those days are numbered, we are going to face a massive food and water shortage emergency before I am sixty years of age. If you want a preview of what is going to come, look at the genocide in Sudan and Darfur, that multi-decade nightmare was caused at its root by droughts brought on by climate change.

Our continued existence as human beings upon the face of this earth is at stake. Unless we fight for our lives, we shall die. In all the history of humanity we have never before been so close to death and extinction. Many of us are dying or already dead. 

In the wake of Larry Kramer’s disappointment with Gay Men’s Health Crisis, he did two things. First, he went on a long vacation and wrote THE NORMAL HEART, a deeply affecting play derived from the finest tradition of agit-prop. Second, he formed the AIDS Coalition To Unleash Power (ACT-UP). They were mortally terrified young men and women who were fighting for their lives, so they didn’t care what the consequences were so long as they got results. It is not my place here to call for any type of law breaking, and I furthermore admire Bill McKibben’s People’s Climate March. The Pope is now coming to America to make an address about climate change at the UN as a follow-up to his ground-breaking encyclical. The G7 just made a vow to end fossil fuel consumption totally by the end of the century. But there are simple steps we as humans need to make to affect change. Here’s what I do, I am not going to suggest anything I don’t practice because it is hypocritical if I only preach it.

  • Become a vegetarian.
    Veganism is hard and I have yet to get that far. But the facts are simple, it takes more electricity to store and prepare animal products. If you give up meat alone, you are making a serious impact on the level of fossil fuels you consume. And what’s more, you also can do yourself serious good. Studies are now showing a link between depression and eating meat, probably having to do with the amount of hormones and other junk they pump animals up with these days.
  • Ride a bike and public transportation.
    Again, you not only decrease the amount of fossil fuels you consume, you give your body a major work-out. Exercise is also shown to help benefit your mood and productivity.
  • Recycle more.
    Most of us probably separate the newspaper and bottles and put them in the green bin already, but we might be missing a few things. For example, how many recyclable paper items do you throw into the trash in your bathroom? I have made it a habit of digging out the cardboard toilet paper cores and bar soap wrappers, which are made of either paperboard or recyclable paper. Take the extra time to rinse out used plastic food storage bags and put them in the recycling bin. What about the plastic bag your loaf of bread comes in? You would be surprised at the number of items you find in the trash that belong in the green bin.
  • Monitor the amount of electricity you use.
    There are so man little things that reduce your power consumption. Unplug things like phone chargers when they are not in use. Reduce the brightness on your computer monitor. Change the settings in your computer to moderate whether disk drives are powered when not in use. Use fluorescent or LED bulbs in your lights. Turn off your computer when not in use. These little steps lead to a long journey of responsible power consumption.
  • Share this information.
    If you can get people to also follow these steps, they results could be astounding.

The results that are already guaranteed to take place because of climate change are terrible. There is no stopping some of it. But at the same times, human beings are magnificent creatures that have never failed to survive in the most dire straits. The flooding of 2037 could be catastrophic, but it also could be hindered if we adopt some of the dike and dam practices used for centuries by the Dutch. We could also in that time adapt out buildings to prepare for the inundation and create high structures to house people. And, if we are lucky, we could end up recreating our species in the face of this catastrophe. I just recently read on CounterPunch an article about a type of organic farming that pulls carbon out of the air, something that shows great promise. But we cannot rely on our leaders for this. It is going to require a lot of small-d democratic work to create the groundswell necessary.

kaGh5_patreon_name_and_message

The next POTUS very well might be a Republican


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

August 6, 2015 marked two historic events in television history. On Comedy Central was the final episode of Jon Stewart as anchor of The Daily Show, while Fox News held a Republican debate featuring (literally) front and center Donald Trump. It was a true challenge to attempt to discern what to watch, on the one hand you have one of the funniest human beings in the history of news media and on the other you have Jon Stewart. But lost in the flurry of self-congratulation is an important fact. This election could very well end with a Republican victory. That may go against conventional wisdom, but there are some very disturbing facts to consider.

First, as emphasized by a recent New York Times Magazine article, two major provisions of the historic Voting Rights Act, which turned 50 this week, Sections 4 and 5, were gutted in the 2013 Supreme Court case Shelby County v. Holder, provisions which provided federal oversight to voting districts with a history of disenfranchisement. As a result, these problematic sections of the country, some in key battleground states, are rolling out all types of ridiculous registration requirements that were abolished five decades ago, like literacy tests or voter identification laws. In another haunting development, the window of time for early voting has been decreased significantly, making submission of absentee ballots more difficult.

Already we have seen efforts to heighten voter registration by the Democrats, including Hillary Clinton’s push for enrollment on the campaign trail and David Cicilline’s proposed bill to automatically register people when they go to the DMV, but these are steps that may prove to be too little too late. The disenfranchisement movement has been hard at work for years now and already has one victory under their belt. The supposed default nominee of the Republicans, Jeb Bush, ran a test-run of voter purging as governor of Florida in 2000 that handed his brother those key electoral college votes and thus the election. In 2004, the state of Ohio was handed to Bush with a margin later found by a congressional report to have been rigged. There are now 34 states, including Rhode Island, that require identification at the polling place, cards which are hard to obtain for elder and minority voters who lack transport or time to get to the DMV.

But another fact that people need to consider is what will happen when people Feel The Bern-Out. I can respect the enthusiasm of those supporting Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, but there are no promises that he will gain the nomination, especially with key endorsements from labor and other groups having been sold to Hillary Clinton years ago. If Sanders loses the nomination, he has promised to direct his supporters to Clinton. But what is to guarantee they will follow his directions?

In 2000, traditional Democratic voters, disgusted with the Clintons and unimpressed by Al Gore, defected to the Green Party and cast ballots for Ralph Nader. This time around, the Greens are pushing an alternative first female president, Dr. Jill Stein, a woman of tremendous courage, intellect, and insight who lacks the finances necessary to buy this election. Some have even gone as far to argue that Nader votes were the reason traditional blue states went red in 2000. In our faux-democratic two-party plutocracy, there are not many things that differentiate neoliberals and neoconservatives. But in the minor places they do differ, such as in cases of choice, Affirmative Action, the environment, and labor, there is a dramatic impact to be seen. Already women’s rights are yet again on the chopping block, this time thanks to a series of deceptively edited undercover videos filmed by disciples of James O’Keefe, the ACORN video guru who successfully destroyed a non-profit whose only sin was holding voter registration drives. The entire field of Republican candidates knows that these videos are fake, but they are using them as talking points to boost their campaigns.

This is a foreshadowing of things yet to come should a Republican steal this election, something I worry could very well happen. And part of the fault will lie with the Democrats. Instead of relying on the old methods of gaining electoral victories, such as by hitting the pavement and going door-to-door to register voters, they are obsessing with the wonders of the internet and the myriad of ways they can shovel money into the trough of the Democrats. Lewis Black once had a brilliant comedy routine where he described the Republicans as the party of bad ideas and the Democrats as the party of no ideas. That seems to be coming true as we move towards election day. Instead of #FeelTheBern, it should be #FeelTheRegistrationForm.

kaGh5_patreon_name_and_message

Coalition of women bring new voting equipment to RI


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

As Americans celebrated the 50th anniversary of the Voting Rights Act Thursday, Governor Gina Raimondo and Secretary of State Nellie Gorbea observed the historic Act’s passing in their own way – by signing into law legislation that will update Rhode Island’s voting equipment for the first time in 20 years.

Gov. Raimondo signing bill to give Sec. of State Gorbea authorization to buy new voting equipment.
Gov. Raimondo signing bill to give Sec. of State Gorbea authorization to buy new voting equipment.

Bills S999 and H6312, sponsored by Senator Cynthia Coyne (District 32) and Representative Kathleen Fogarty (District 35), gives the Secretary of State the power to purchase new voting equipment, a duty that was formerly carried out by the Board of Elections.

“Back in 1997, when the last purchasing bill was done, it was set up so that it would revert over to the Board of Elections,” Secretary Gorbea explained. “So, for the last 17 years that’s where it had rested, and the legislature, in this past session, saw fit to turn that around. Now, of course, the Board of Elections is an instrumental part of this, and is working with us on this process.”

She added that voting equipment is part of a democracy’s infrastructure, and that citizens in a democracy depend on that equipment to “deliver fair, fast, and accurate elections.”

Gorbea has ordered the creation of a Voting Equipment Task Force, to inform the Department of State’s process of researching and buying new equipment, which has not been updated since 1997. John Marion, the executive director of Common Cause Rhode Island, is a member of the task force, said the Board of Elections was not moving into the 21st century fast enough when it came to voting infrastructure, so the new legislation is a good way to move forward, even though it may be less transparent.

“The Board of Elections process could have been more transparent, because in the end the Board would have to vote in a public session on the purchase of the new machines, and now the Secretary can make the decision. The Secretary is not a board that has to have a public session,” he said. “But, fortunately, the Secretary convened a task force, to give input, and it’s a very expansive task force that brings in a lot of different people in the community. So, I think she is being as transparent as she can be, given the circumstances.”

Marion also said that the task force will be looking at what other states have done to influence how they will go about acquiring new equipment. Common Cause as a whole, he said, is also interested in making voting more accessible to Rhode Islanders. Senator Coyne shared that sentiment.

“The signing of this legislation is crucial to not only ensuring our elections are fair and accurate, but also to bringing the state’s voting machines into the 21st century,” she said. “In addition, modern equipment will make the voting process easier for Rhode Islanders, which will hopefully result in more people becoming involved in the democratic process.”

Governor Raimondo added that the main goal is to ensure that government works for everybody.

“This is a bill that I supported. I think the Secretary of State will do a good job. It will be efficient, and as I mentioned in my comments, really performance based. We want to make government effective and efficient, and the best use of tax dollars, and I think this does that,” she said.

An interesting side note about this bill that was mentioned at the signing is the fact that all the main stakeholders in its passage are women. Representative Fogarty, of South Kingstown, said that this proves that women create good legislation, which leads to good government.

“It was not something that was planned,” Gorbea said on the subject. “It was just something that happened organically, and I was pleased to see it happen.”

As the divestment movement grows, RI invests


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Jessica Debski & Dr. Noel Healy
Jessica Debski & Dr. Noel Healy

The Divestment Movement,” says Dr. Noel Healy, of Salem State University, “is a very important, very powerful movement.”

Healy and Jessica Debski, a student at Salem State, were presenting a workshop on the divestment movement at the Center for Popular Economics2015 Summer Institute in Northhampton MA. Divestment is simply removing investment funds from fossil fuel companies. Healy and Debski’s research was about student movements working to pressure their colleges or universities into divesting, but divestment has broader applications and aims.

The point of divestment isn’t to somehow starve the fossil fuel companies of the funds they need to survive, but to make a moral point about the immorality of participating in and profiting from a practice that is literally killing the world. Divestment stigmatizes the fossil fuel industry, said Healy, and changes the public discourse on collective energy. Governments are pressured to enact meaningful legislation against fossil fuels even as fossil fuel companies are pressured to “undergo transformative change.”

Divestment campaigns also help to raise awareness of the “systemic risk of fossil fuel stranded assets,” that is, the fossil fuels owned by companies that need to stay in the ground if we ever hope to avert climate catastrophe. It also raises awareness about the “disproportionate impacts of climate change on developing nations, economically disadvantaged communities, and future generations,” said Healy.

In the course of their research, Healy and Debski identified nine of the most common arguments institutions use against calls for divestment. One by one these excuses were projected on a screen and one by one Healy took these excuses apart.

In light of Governor Gina Raimondo’s recent decision to back, rather than oppose, a new fracked gas energy plant in Burrillville, I think it’s worth examining these arguments in detail.

1. We all use fossil fuels – so divestment is hypocritical.

“To say this implies that we have a direct choice in energy sources,” says Healy, but how can that be the case when the entire system is rigged towards fossil fuels? Healy’s words immediately resonated with me. For instance, what kind of public input was sought before making the decision to build a fracked gas plant in Burrillville?

2. Divestment is pointless – it cannot bankrupt the coal, oil and gas companies.

I touched on this argument in my opening above, but to reiterate, bankrupting the companies financially is not the point. The point is to call out the companies on their moral bankruptcy. Don’t forget the power of previous divestment movements, such as those targeting tobacco and South African Apartheid.

3. Divestment is not meaningful, its just gesture politics

This argument ignores the power of symbolism and the power of taking a strong moral stand. All movements start with such gestures. Divestment is a proven strategy. Think again about tobacco and Apartheid.

4. Shareholder engagement with fossil fuel companies is the best way to drive change

The idea here is that if institutions were to keep some stock in fossil fuel companies they would be able to agitate for positive change from within the system. The problem, maintains Healy, is that there is “no evidence to support this.”

“There is no fixable flaw in fossil fuel industry business plan,” says Healy, “We are asking a company to go out of business.”

5. Fossil fuels are essential to ending world poverty

Remember that these are real arguments, made by real institutions. “Developing countries demand energy,” points out Healy, “not coal.” If given a choice about how that energy is to be generated, nearly everyone prefers renewables. Climate change, caused by fossil fuels, will impact frontline communities and impoverished peoples disproportionately. Rather than essential to ending world poverty fossil fuels are a threat to the world’s poor.

6. Most fossil fuels are owned by state controlled companies, not publicly traded companies targeted by divestment

This is true. But the strategy around divestment is to stigmatize fossil fuels and to force government regulation and a change in energy policy. Also, it is worth noting that the rights to most of the carbon that needs to stay in the ground if we ever hope to avoid cataclysmic climate change has been bought up by private companies.

7. There currently is no alternative to fossil fuel use

“Politics, not technology is the biggest hurdle,” maintains Healy. Our government subsidizes fossil fuels. The IMF says that “G20 countries subsidize fossil fuel companies $1,000 per citizen.” There are alternatives, if we demand them.

8. Primary role of universities is to conduct research, inform public policy and educate

And the primary point of investments is to make money. But at what cost? Taking a moral stand on the apocalypse, goes this thinking, is not within the purview of financial investments. Healy points out that institutions of higher learning that take this attitude are undermining their commitment to science and truth. They are immorally putting future generations at risk, the same generations these institutions are committed to educating.

9. The Fossil Fuel sectors are major investors in alternative energy

In truth, fossil fuel companies, as an industry, invest less than 1 percent of their funds into alternative energy. It simply isn’t true that they are “major investers.” Remember also that we subsidize fossil fuels in ways we do not subsidize renewables.

Healy and Debski made a strong, compelling case for divestment from fossil fuels.

Rhode Island, in welcoming this new fracked gas plant in Burrillville, is planning to invest in moral obsolescence.

You can watch Dr. Noel Healy take apart the arguments against divestment here:

Jessica Debski outlines the history of the divestment movement and outlines some of their research here:

Patreon

Why a public park, not a baseball stadium


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
parcel-14
The original plan for the I-195 land, the green portions highlighted are the proposed locations of an open park.

There has been great talk of late centered around the protests against the stadium. I want to offer a few ideas here about the strategy being offered in Providence by those who are adamant that the parcel of land remain designated as an open space green park.

First, it is important to begin with where this park idea comes from. Section 42-64.14-5 of H 5994- AN ACT RELATING TO PUBLIC PROPERTY AND WORKS, the law passed in 2011, reads:

However, parcels P2 and P4, as delineated on that certain plan of land captioned “Improvements to Interstate Route 195, Providence, Rhode Island, Proposed Development Parcel Plans 1 through 10, Scale: 1”=20’, May 2010, Bryant Associates, Inc., Engineers-Surveyors-Construction Managers, Lincoln, RI, Maguire Group, Inc., Architects/Engineers/Planners, Providence, RI,” shall be developed and continued to be used as parks or park supporting activity provided, however, that the city of Providence shall not be responsible for the upkeep of the parks unless a memorandum of understanding is entered into between the commission or the state and the city of Providence that grants full funding to the city for that purpose.

To that extent, the taxpayers have already funded landscape architects who have been developing plans for the future park, as seen in this slideshow.

But besides this issue is one that will determine the future development of the rest of the I-195 land. The stadium proposal is throwing a major monkey wrench into the drafting of a master permit by Department of Environmental Management, the Coastal Resources Management Council, and the Narragansett Bay Commission “that would shorten the time it takes for developers to build on former Route 195 land,” as Kate Bramson of the ProJo reported on May 2. The open park is intended to also include a stormwater mitigation mechanism that would shorten building permit wait times significantly. Bramson’s piece had a few lines worth repeating, including a quote from Quonset Development Corporation’s managing director Steven King:

“In Rhode Island, time is a killer,” King said. “When you get bogged down, your business seeks the path of least resistance.”

Bramson went on to explain that, if the stadium were to be built, it could trigger a domino-like reaction where the various agencies involved would have to revise their portions of the master permit and perhaps lead to further delays in development of the land. This is something that could end up being a real threat to construction jobs in Providence because these three agencies are not known for being anything but stringent. One of the alternatives would include underground construction in a part of Providence already well-known for traffic jams or using another parcel of land as a park where a building could have been. When I recently asked Syd McKenna, co-host of the PawSox listening tour, about this issue, she shrugged and said they intend the stadium to have a grass field, ergo no worries. But that is not exactly the same thing, the underground foundation of the stadium could end up failing to meet the mitigation requirements.

Another point I would encourage the Providence opposition to focus their energies on is making the team publicize the terms of the deal. Right now, the owners are trying to push the idea of a contract that would be ‘revenue neutral’, but I am unsure if that is just Rhode Island-ese for tax breaks, subsidies, and public funding. The simple message should be four words, ‘Show Us The Deal‘. While I respect the efforts of the people in Providence, I am skeptical about sending a petition to City Council based on the Providence Home Rule Charter Section 209 because when this strategy was used last so to raise the minimum wage, the General Assembly voided it by passing a law to bar municipalities from doing so, something they have done multiple times before. If the City Council or State House were to void the petition, that would be a tremendously disenchanting. But by engaging in a PR blitz calling for nothing more or less radical than transparency and no tax breaks, subsidies, and public financing, there is a further chance for success. And incidentally, the financing is the meta-issue that will resolve all the others by default. The park, the master permit, and the host of other peripheral concerns will take care of themselves if the PawSox do not get the financing they want, it is as simple as that. Having attended most of the Listening Tour stops, I can report that the speakers are doing very well at adapting to answer the tiny concerns, such as now including the claim that the ownership will build an adjacent green park so to appease those focused solely on that topic, but they consistently stonewall when asked to disclose the terms of the deal they want. Every decent attorney knows that kind of silence is the sign of a weak spot, so continuing to agitate on that point will continue to frustrate the owners.

These parcels have the potential to generate both years of joy at no cost for the general public and also revenues for the city when organizations reserve space for events. By contrast, a ‘revenue neutral’ stadium would cost money to attend and would send all event monies to the PawSox owners. Just last night, it was announced that Larry Lucchino, principal owner of the PawSox, is leaving his post at Fenway to devote more time to championing the stadium’s construction. This makes clear to me that, while they are probably getting desperate, this is not the end of anything, we have merely entered the eye of the hurricane.

kaGh5_patreon_name_and_message

ACLU wants broader investigation in Cranston Police Dept.


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

RI ACLU Union LogoCalling the findings of the Rhode Island State Police (RISP) investigation into the Cranston Police Department likely the “tip of an iceberg,” the ACLU of Rhode Island urged the Cranston City Council to call for further investigations into police practices and possible abuses of power against individuals outside the department.

In a letter sent to city councilors Tuesday, ACLU of Rhode Island executive director Steven Brown noted that while the RISP report was thorough, it focused on a handful of discrete, and largely internal, matters. Further investigation is warranted, the letter argued, because “the public deserves to know whether the improper actions so thoroughly documented in this report were, somewhat incredibly, the only such abuses to take place, or whether there were other unknown victims of these violations of the public trust.”

Steve Brown
Steve Brown

According to the RISP report, former police chief Marco Palombo not only hired private investigators to conduct surveillance of two police officers, but also briefly spied on a contract civilian computer technician. That spying also entailed police improperly accessing a DMV database to obtain information about the technician. The ACLU letter notes that “if police misused their access to state databases for one political purpose, the reasonable question naturally arises whether this was the only time such databases were misused.” As for surveillance of civilians in addition to the technician, another city employee alleged she too had been the subject of police surveillance. Though the RISP report was unable to substantiate her suspicions, Brown noted that under the circumstances, her concerns “cannot be dismissed out of hand either.”

The ACLU’s letter also pointed to RISP findings that police officials “improperly sought” search warrants for phone records of two targeted employees, and that the affidavits “appeared to be misleading to the Court.” At about the same time, Brown noted, a Rhode Island judge, ruling in a completely unrelated criminal case, sharply criticized Cranston police for, among other things, submitting warrant affidavits that contained “false statements that were deliberate or made in reckless disregard for the truth.”  Many of the “dubious practices” cited by the Court, states the letter, “seem eerily similar to some contained in the State Police report.”

These examples lend credence to the possibility that the documented “questionable activities used against fellow officers may have seeped into police activities against non-officers.” As a result, the ACLU letter called it “essential that further investigations be conducted to see if any of these troubling, and potentially unlawful, practices were utilized against others in instances unrelated to Ticketgate and the internal power struggles examined by the report.

The ACLU noted, as the State Police did, that the vast majority of police officers in the Cranston Police Department should not be judged by the bad actions of a few. At the same time, the RISP findings “may represent part of a broader pattern of police misconduct that cannot and should not be ignored lest it unintentionally promote a culture of indifference to basic civil rights that may continue to sprout in other contexts.”

As a result, Brown urged the City Council to “demand answers as to whether the police department, with or without the knowledge of the Mayor, may have engaged in other questionable activities against city residents since 2009, whether it was through improper surveillance, misuse of state databases, or other questionable undertakings such as those that have now been documented.”

This piece is based on a RI ACLU press release.

Protestors combat fracking in Rhode Island with Burriville power plant


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

After a fittingly stormy Tuesday morning, Governor Gina Raimondo announced a controversial plan at the Greater Providence Chamber of Commerce to open a natural gas power plant in Burriville amid environmental protests and citizen complaints.

Protestors rally in front of Providence Chamber of Commerce as Gov. Raimondo announces Clear River Energy Center
Protestors rally in front of Providence Chamber of Commerce as Gov. Raimondo announces Clear River Energy Center

The plant, called the Clear River Energy Center, would utilize fracking to generate energy with natural gas. Fracking is a process that involves drilling into the earth, and then shooting a high-pressure water mixture at the rock to release the natural gas inside. Environmentalists have opposed the practice for a number of reasons. First, the process uses huge amounts of water that must be transported to the site. Second, many worry that dangerous chemicals used in the process may contaminate groundwater around the site. There are also concerns that fracking causes small earthquakes.

The company that is sponsoring and privately funding the $700 million project, Invenergy, says that the practice is clean and environmentally friendly because the new plant will prevent older, less efficient plants from emitting pollutants like carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and sulphur oxides into the air.

Invenergy has predicted $280 million in energy savings for Rhode Islanders once the energy center is up and running. There would be an overall economic impact of $1.3 billion between 2016 and 2034. Roughly 300 construction jobs would be added to the state’s workforce to build the facility, over a 30 month time period. There would also be 25-30 permanent, skilled positions to actually run the center.

“The construction of this clean energy generation facility will create hundreds of jobs while delivering more affordable and reliable energy to our businesses and homes,” Governor Raimondo said. “We are tackling our regional energy challenges, committing to cleaner energy systems in the long-term, and putting Rhode Islanders back to work.”

Even with this promise of clean energy, there are still many staunch opponents to the proposed facility. Fighting Against Natural Gas, or FANG, held an emergency rally in front of the Chamber of Commerce as Governor Raimondo unveiled her plan. Some even believed the facility to be a “rape” of Burriville’s air, water, and soil.

Robert Malin from Rhode Island’s chapter of the Sierra Club attended the protest, in opposition to the proposed facility. Malin believes that the government has been less than forthcoming with details for the project, and shouldn’t be trusted.

More protestors rallying against Burriville fracking.
More protestors rallying against Burriville fracking.

“The Governor has been saying that she doesn’t know anything about gas or fracking, and that this whole thing is just one little expansion that they’re doing, and by the way, we don’t have any money to build out the renewables, it’s a wish. Maybe in 20 years we’ll get around to actually doing it,” he said. “Then the next thing you know, they can dig into their pockets, they can pull out $700 million, and this thing that they’re planning, had to be planned in advance. They kept this whole thing under the table. Why wasn’t the public able to decide whether we want an explosive power plant building, bringing fracked gas, a deadly practice that was outlawed in New York state, that’s what we’re bringing.”

Malin explained that even though many don’t consider natural gas a fossil fuel, believing it lacks a carbon footprint, the energy source actually leaves what he called a “ghost footprint,” and still contributes to global warming.

“You’re trying to track a colorless, odorless gas,” he said. “Unfortunately, when it gets into the atmosphere, it’s called an accelerant to global warming. So, if you can imagine, you’ve got a big wood fire, and you take some gasoline and throw it on the fire. It flares up really quick. So if you’re not right there when you’re measuring it, when it flares up, then it’s very hard to track. The bad new is that it has the same carbon footprint as other fossil fuels, like coal and oil when it’s done.”

Stephen Dahl, from Fossil Free Rhode Island, said that Raimondo’s plan is short term, and that there are better options and avenues for the state to undertake.

“I think that is a very short gain that they are playing. In the short term, we’ll have jobs. For the longer term, if we follow countries like Germany and Scandinavia, and their mix of energies, in which we can build a transition to 100 percent wind, water, and solar for all purposes, both residential and commercial, here in Rhode Island, by 2050,” he said. “I understand that she has a limited term in office, and she wants to get something done. The way she’s chosen forward, though, is unfortunately, that short-term prospect, which will bring us more catastrophes. So, I object to it.”

Raimondo, and Invenergy’s Founder and CEO Michael Polsky both insisted that fracking, in combination with renewable energy sources, is only one of many puzzle pieces that can be put together to help slow climate change. According to Invenergy, the Clear River Energy Center will add more than 900 megawatts of new, cleaner energy to the regional energy grid, and will displace older, less efficient plants. It will also invest in well treatment and system upgrades, which will benefit 1,200 Pascoag Utility District water customers by contracting on a long-term basis for industrial water supply. Commercial benefits for the town of Burriville include millions of dollars in tax revenue, as well as the reduction of the property tax burden for homeowners.

Once approved, the Clear River Energy Center will begin construction in 2016, with operations scheduled to begin by summer 2019.

Emily Kawano on the solidarity economy


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
20150802_210634
Emily Kawano and Robert Pollin

Can Capitalism be tamed? Can Capitalism become more caring and socially responsible?

These are the questions Dr. Emily Kawano asked and attempted to answer as the other half of the opening plenary at the Center for Popular Economics 2015 Summer Institute in Northhampton MA, which I am attending all this week. Robert Pollin gave the other half of the plenary talk, and I wrote about that first, because it seemed to relate more to the recent news that Governor Gina Raimondo was announcing a new fracked gas energy plant to be built in Burrillville, RI. But  I didn’t want to pass up the opportunity to write about Kawano’s talk, which was eye opening and filled with possibilities.

Emily Kawano has a doctorate in economics and is the coordinator of the U.S. Solidarity Economy Network and co-director of Wellspring Cooperative. She spoke about transforming our economic system from capitalism to what she calls the solidarity economy.

The biggest problem facing our society is climate change, fueled by capitalism. Kawano mentioned the book The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History by Elizabeth Kolbert, which covers past mass extinctions (like the one that killed the dinosaurs) and argues that we are living through the sixth extinction now, and that the cause of this extinction is humanity, not a stray asteroid.

So, can Capitalism be tamed before the worst effects of climate change damage the planet beyond repair? Kawano thinks not. Capitalism can be reigned in, but that’s not enough. What is needed in a “big shift in our paradigm, a different way of being with each other and the earth and nature,” says Kawano.

We need a solidarity economy.

A solidarity economy is based on values and principles such as solidarity, cooperation, mutualism, sustainability, democracy, equity and pluralism.

The kinds of things that scare the crap out of capitalists.

A solidarity economy focuses on living well and living in harmony with each other and the natural world. It is, says Kawano, “a different way of thinking about the economy.”

The rights of the natural world, people, animals, insects, water, even life itself, would be prioritized. Human social creations, such as knowledge, spirituality (what a Humanist might call conscience) and art would be freely shared.

Governance would include such revolutionary ideas as participatory budgeting, community led development, collective ownership, regulation, restorative justice and democracy. In a solidarity economy unpaid work, such as the care provided by parents for children and families for the elderly, would be considered as part of the economy as a whole. Banks would be public institutions.

It all sounds like a utopian fairy tale, until you consider that once upon a time, a government that guaranteed free speech, freedom of assembly and freedom of religion also sounded impossible.

The concepts of a solidarity economy have been built into the constitutions of Ecuador and Bolivia. There are solidarity economy ministries in Brazil, France and Luxembourg. There is a United Nations task force examining these ideas, as well as the ILO (International Labor Organization).

The environmental encyclical of Pope Francis, Laudato Si’, is full of solidarity economy-like talk.

Climate change is coming fast. Economic planning is the most effective way to shift economies, markets are slow by comparison. Think about WWII, when the economy switched from a civilian to a war economy. That wasn’t markets reacting to end fascism, that was governmental policy.

The solidarity economy is about taking all these different systems, ideas and grassroots work and trying “to pull them together,” says Kawano. “The mainstream economy isn’t seeing it.”

On the local and grassroots level Kawano is talking about networks of worker-owned businesses, job creation in marginalized communities, local purchasing from anchor institutions and de-commodification through community land trusts, to name just a few ideas.

It turns out that economic revolution, like mass extinction, is hard to see from the inside. Did the people living through the end of feudalism and the beginnings of capitalism understand what was happening? Not really. They were buffeted by forces they could not understand or control, and the end result was unparalleled economic growth combined with environmental disaster.

If we had a chance to do it again, we would make different choices. That’s the solidarity economy.

Patreon


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387