DePetro, Carcieri, Healey in East Greenwich tonight


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

depetroI saw my ideological nemesis and neighbor John DePetro on Main Street here in East Greenwich the other day. “What’s going on, John?” I said to him. To which he replied, “I have nothing to say to you.”

Then he added as he walked away, “I’ll see you in court.”

I’m assuming he means for the sexual harassment suit our former colleague Dee DeQuattro has filed against him, but who knows. Experience tells me the truth is usually the opposite of what John DePetro says it is, so perhaps I won’t see him in court. Though I do know he appeared before the state Human Rights Commission for the allegation recently. So on the other hand, maybe I will see him in court.

Either way, I plan to see him tonight night when he hosts a panel discussion with former governor Don Carcieri, Catholic priest and State House lobbyist Bernard Healey and former GOP state senator and Alix and Ani CEO John Feroci at the Odeum Theater, also on Main Street in East Greenwich.

This is a pretty tight-knit group. The evening is being sponsored by Besos, a new local restaurant. The owners are very good friends with both Feroce and the Carcieri family (in fact, they bought the former governor’s downtown mcmansion from him). All of participants belong to the local Catholic church, where Healey is the priest.

Coincidentally, these conservative Catholics were booked by a liberal Jew. Frank Prosnitz, former ProJo and Providence Business News editor, has been leading the local effort to revitalize the Odeum for years. He’s managed to get the doors open, but with renovation bills now due he’s turned to this conservative cabal to help bring in some revenue. It will certainly be interesting to see what kind of crowd this group attracts.

I don’t know Feroce too well, though I did meet him years ago when I was in college and he was in the state senate. Bernie Healey is best known for lobbying State House leaders against marriage equality. Carcieri used his two terms as governor to advocate against immigrants, equality, poor people and the public sector. Few Republicans have been willing to defend him since he left office and his infamously failed scheme to give his friend Curt Schilling public money to make a video game has rendered him one of the least popular local politicians in recent memory. DePetro is widely regarded as the most mean-spirited and dishonest person in Rhode Island politics and/or media.

Alex and Ani aside, it’d be hard to put together a trio that has done more damage to Rhode Island than Carcieri, DePetro and Healey. I wish the local theater much luck, but this seems like more evidence things aren’t going well for the Odeum.

Patch abandons community journalism business model


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

patchThere’s been a lot of changes at Patch, the network of local news websites, since I left the company two years ago.

Back then, the AOL-owned company was launching new sites nationwide with reckless abandon. It preached the gospel of community journalism and prided itself on outfitting its editors with tools and resources to cover their towns. It was a fun place to work and morale among my co-workers was very high.

Now all that has changed. For the worse.

When I worked there, Patch employed 19 full-time journalists to staff 15 sites in Rhode Island. Each site had a healthy freelance budget and a part-time community editor. Now, there are only 10 full-time journalists working for the 15 local sites; freelance budgets and community editors have been eliminated altogether.

And as of today, Patch’s initial business model of having one editor dedicated to a community is gone too.

Every local editor in Rhode Island is now responsible for multiple sites. This has been happening through attrition for about a year, but Patch in RI is undergoing a big reshuffle this week.

Many local employees have been discussing the changes on social networks, but to my knowledge there has been no formal announcement from the company. Suffice to say, the folksy pictures of local editors at the top of each site now have little to no relationship to the reality of the staffing situation anymore.

Patch invested heavily in Rhode Island when it needed to develop an audience. Now that it is a known commodity, the company is dramatically scaling back. Employees are being given fewer resources and are expected to produce more results. Many openly complain about their jobs and their community on Facebook. Sales staff is gaining influence over editorial decisions.

This isn’t the model for community journalism, this is the model for corporate journalism.

House Finance will hear tax equity bills today


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

tax rate v unemploymentThe powerful House Finance Committee will hear two bills on income tax equity today. One sponsored by Rep. Maria Cimini of Providence would raise income taxes on the richest Rhode Islanders by 2 percent and would mean $60 million for the state. The other, sponsored by Rep. Larry Valencia, who represents Exeter, Hopkinton and Richmond, would raises income taxes on the rich by 4 percent.

Both bills are targeted to reverse income tax cuts for those who make more than $200,000 a year, or families that make more than $250,000. Legislative leaders, specifically House Speaker Gordon Fox, and former Governor Don Carcieri sold these tax cuts to the public on the basis that they would help improve Rhode Island’s economy. The state economy got worse with each subsequent tax cut.

Here’s Valencia explaining the difference between the two bills being heard today:

Keep abortion restrictions out of Rhode Island


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Not in our StateThe same radical anti-abortion agenda coming out of state legislatures from Arkansas to North Dakota is headed straight for Rhode Island. Today 5 dangerous abortion restriction bills will be heard at the State House that would work to insert politicians between a woman and her doctor – and would bring the same extreme legislation that has threatened a woman’s right to choose in statehouses across the country.

The bills proposed would work to mandate a woman undergo an ultrasound prior to having an abortion, create 24 hour wait periods prior to an abortion, create additional laws around late term abortions and establish “fetal personhood.” The reality of these bills would establish invasive, unnecessary barriers to service and turn healthcare in a political tool. Make no mistake about it, these bills have one target: to prevent women from accessing their right to choose what to do with their own bodies in the state of Rhode Island.

Real Problems Deserve Real Solutions

Reducing the number of unintended pregnancies deserves real and thoughtful solutions. If the politicians proposing and supporting these kinds of bills were really working to help reduce the number of unintended pregnancies each year in Rhode Island, they would turn their attention to the expansion of Family Planning under the Medicaid program. Currently, Rhode Island covers family planning services for Medicaid recipients who deliver babies, for only two years post-partum. That means that after that time, women are dropped from the program and lose access to basic reproductive health services, including annual well woman exams, Pap tests, breast exams, testing for sexually transmitted infections, and yes – contraception, which would help space their families and work to prevent unintended pregnancies.

Rhode Island already gets a D+ grade from NARAL and has some of the most stringent abortion laws on the books in New England. We need to turn out focus toward investing in family planning programs that not only work to reduce unintended pregnancy but save the state $4 for every $1 invested.  Today, we have a chance to raise our voices against five dangerous bills that actively seek to stand between a woman, her physician and her personal medical decisions. We NEED your help to fill the hearing room, to testify as a Rhode Island voter – and your presence as a supporter of reproductive justice. If you can’t join us for the hearing, contact your state legislators and let them know that is enough is enough. Egregious bills like these don’t belong in Rhode Island and together we can stand up and say Not in Our State! Help us tell lawmakers that Rhode Island cares about reproductive justice and we won’t stand for radical abortion restrictions in the Ocean State.

More illogic from RIDE


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

In a reply to my post about sneaky changes in the NECAP documentation, the RI Department of Education spokesman wrote this:

“The NECAP assessment is designed to measure whether students have attained the knowledge and skills expected at each grade level, that is, whether students have met grade-level standards.”

This, of course, is the heart of the matter, isn’t it?  I claim the test is a poor measure of the mastery of a body of knowledge, and therefore it is, shall we say, an outrageous act of irresponsibility to use it for a graduation test.  RIDE, of course, says otherwise.  This is precisely what is at issue in this whole controversy, and simply stating it as fact at the head of a reply doesn’t really address the point at all, but simply seeks to override it with the voice of authority.

In truth, as was pointed out by the psychometricians I’ve spoken to, RIDE has done little or no work to demonstrate the “validity” of the test, this very question.  For an employment test, by contrast, the laws insist that the employer demonstrate — with real data — that good performance on the test is a good way to identify good employees.  RIDE relies on correlation between NECAP scores and survey questions that ask piffle like “how much homework do you do in a week?”

The NECAP test was designed with the grade-level expectations (GLE) in mind, and it uses questions relevant to those GLEs.  Does that make it a good measure of whether a student has mastered those or not?  Tom Hoffman, who runs tuttlesvc.org, a great education resource, showed us at a Senate hearing that performance in Massachusetts and Rhode Island is not so very different on the 8th-grade math NAEP tests (administered by the federal Dept of Education and widely considered the “gold standard” of testing).  Overall, Massachusetts does do better than Rhode Island on that test, but they’re not in a different league.  But performance is dramatically different on the 11th-grade math tests administered by each state (NECAP in RI, the MCAS in MA).  Can anyone explain this?  Do our kids get dumber in the 9th and 10th grades?  Or are the tests different in ways that haven’t been adequately explained?

“NECAP was not designed to provide, in isolation, detailed student-level diagnostic information for formulating individual instructional plans.”

This is a quote from the NECAP documentation, earlier in the paragraph that they “clarified.”  According to RIDE, then, we should read “in isolation” in the sentence above as “only taking it once”?  This is comparable to the way RIDE claims that “multiple measures” is to mean that you can take the NECAP more than one time.  This is silly.  What the above means is that NECAP is a clue to student achievement, but should only be used as one of several measures, as was policy under the previous commissioner.  Making passage a graduation requirement is contrary to the meaning of the NECAP designers’ instructions.

Let’s end with a brief but important digression.

One hundred years ago, Henry Goddard, who went to school at Moses Brown and was a member of the first generation of psychological testers, persuaded Congress to let him set up an IQ testing program at Ellis Island that eventually proved that most immigrants were “morons.” (He  coined the term.)  During World War I, intelligence tests used to select officers were later shown to have profound biases in favor of native-born recruits and those of northern European extraction, which is another way to say that lots of Italian-American soldiers were unjustly denied promotions. For decades, misused IQ tests classified tremndous numbers of healthy children as disabled, or mentally deficient — well into the 1960s and 1970s. The history of testing in America is littered with misuses of testing that have had profound and unjust effects on millions of adults and children.  Does the available evidence about the NECAP test persuade you that we are not in the middle of one more chapter of this terrible history?

A graduation test is not a trivial thing.  The results of a test can have a significant impact on a young person’s life.  It seems to me that the burden is on the people who think a high-stakes graduation test is the only sensible way forward to demonstrate — with a great deal more rigor than they have so far bothered to do — that a test measures what it is supposed to measure.  The IQ tests at Ellis Island, in the officer corps, and in the schools, did not measure what they claimed, and thousands upon thousands of lives were changed, few for the better.

If these policy changes are being made for the sake of our children, then can’t we stand to have a little more compassion while we’re making them?  This means intellectual honesty, and it also means being careful not to ruin lives you say you’re trying to help.

Help NLC revitalize Rhode Island this Thursday


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Help revitalize Rhode Island by going to the New Leaders Council New Leaders Night: Revitalizing Rhode Island. It’s this Thursday at the Blackstone Valley Tourism Council headquarters, 175 Main St., Pawtucket, from 6 to 9 p.m.

This year’s event – billed as “an award ceremony and performance showcase, highlighting the cultural diversity and progressive leadership within the Ocean State” – will recognize Suzy Alba, Bobby Britto-Oliverio, Brad Fesmire and Calvin Jones.

Tickets are $15 for students and $20 for the general public. The catering is courtesy of Pizzoco Ristorante and the proceeds go to support the good work the New Leaders Council does in Rhode Island.

You can read about the New Leaders Council class of 2013 here.

nlcInvite

Downcity gentrification vs. big picture masterplan


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
The Superman Building from Smith Hill. (Photo by Bob Plain)
The Superman Building from Smith Hill. (Photo by Bob Plain)

The Superman building is certainly one of – if not the – most iconic architectural structures in the Ocean State. We don’t want to lose that. But what’s happening with the inside the building is a pretty iconic example of the current economy. We do want to lose that.

111 Westminster began its existence as the George Bailey-esque Industrial Trust Tower in 1927 and, over the years, became the Fleet Tower, then briefly BankBoston, until eventually being swallowed up by Bank of America – the real life incarnation of Mr. Potter’s fictional evil empire.

It’s not hyperbole to note that the Christmas classic about community concern versus rampant capitalism “It’s a Wonderful Life” predicted that local bank profiteering would devolve into Bank of America-esque entities that would eventually turn on our economy. And that’s exactly what is happening. No Rhode Islander should be doing their banking with this company as they do this to our economy and our Capital City’s centerpiece (Pawtucket Credit Union and Bank Newport are local alternatives).

Going forward, I think it’s important the Superman building remain an iconic symbol of Rhode Island – and our economy. I’m not sold on the idea of more high-end housing, but I’m not viscerally opposed to the idea either. In general, I think it’s a wise use of resources for the government to assist the private sector, and see few similarities to giving Curt Schilling $75 millions to make a video game.

It’s the over-gentrification of Downcity that concerns me. The Nation recently published a special issue called “The Gilded Age: Bloomberg’s New York” that I suspect contains many cautionary tales for Providence, and other cities.

Similarly, I have concerns about turning Kennedy Plaza into a a parking lot for food trucks and other entrapments for upscale urban yuppies.

“The belching diesel fumes and comings and goings of bus passengers too often give this part of our capital city the feel of a third world country,” .

I strongly disagree. In fact, I think Kennedy Plaza is the one place in the state where one can find a cross-section of Rhode Islanders – suburban executives are just as likely to commute to the Capitalist Grill as urban ditch diggers are to take the bus to work. It isn’t bad when these diverse users of downtown Providence have to look each other in the face now and again.

I really like the idea of doing a big master planning effort that extends from the State House to the waterfront. It doesn’t seem to make much sense to make isolated decisions about the common future for the Superman building, Kennedy Plaza, the Dynamo House, the Jewelry District, Shooters and Conley’s Wharf. In fact, i think it’s a good urban planners dream come true. Rhode Island a once in a millennium opportunity to redevelop this entire swath of our capital city into a shining centerpiece for the Ocean State.

111 Photographs of 111 Westminster Street - by Peter Green, aka @downcityhawk. Click on the image for more info on this poster he made.
111 Photographs of 111 Westminster Street – by Peter Green, aka @downcityhawk. Click on the image for more info on this poster he made.

Department of Education responds to Sgouros post


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

gist in egTom Sgouros’ as a graduation requirement caused quite a stir yesterday.  As such, RIDE spokesman Elliot Krieger sent me this email yesterday afternoon:

Commissioner Gist has been forthright about the changes in our interpretation guide regarding the use of NECAP. She has developed a prepared statement that she has used in several presentations, and we have presented this statement to some in the media who have asked for her comment on this point. For example, I know we provided this statement to a TV reporter in late January – probably to others, but I don’t have a complete list. Here is the statement; the context is significant, not the highlighted passages only:

The NECAP assessment is designed to measure whether students have attained the knowledge and skills expected at each grade level, that is, whether students have met grade-level standards.

We use the results of the NECAP assessments for several purposes, including communication with parents, guiding instruction for individual students and groups of students, evaluation of educators, classification of schools, and accountability for schools and districts – as well as in determining readiness for graduation.

Nothing in the design, construction, or administration of the NECAP assessments prevents them from being used in the process of making decisions about educational programs and referrals, promotion, and graduation. Confusion about this point arose because of some language in the initial interpretation guide that all NECAP states used. That language said:

NECAP results are intended to evaluate how well students and schools are achieving the learning targets contained in the Grade Level Expectations. NECAP was designed primarily to provide detailed school-level results and accurate summary information about individual students. NECAP was not designed to provide, in isolation, detailed student-level diagnostic information for formulating individual instructional plans. However, NECAP results can be used, along with other measures, to identify students’ strengths and weaknesses. NECAP is only one indicator of student performance and should not be used for referring students to special education or for making promotion and/or graduation decisions. (Highlights added)

Clearly, the point of this passage, in context, is that single-administration NECAP results alone should not be used for making graduation decisions.

We have since clarified the language in this passage to accurately describe the proper use of the NECAP assessments, and this language is in our current guide:

Use of NECAP Student-Level Results NECAP results are intended to evaluate how well students and schools are achieving the learning targets contained in the Grade Level and Grade Span Expectations. NECAP was designed primarily to provide detailed school-level results and accurate summary information about individual students. NECAP was not designed to provide, in isolation, detailed student-level diagnostic information for formulating individual instructional plans. However, NECAP results can be used, along with other measures, to identify students’ strengths and weaknesses. NECAP is only one indicator of student performance and results of a single NECAP test administration should not be used for referring students to special education or for making promotion and/or graduation decisions. (Highlight added)

Neither the first version of the guide nor the clarification referred to test construction, design, or administration, but rather to the philosophy about the use of test results.

Amend RI Constitution: Corporations aren’t people


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

OP mtaIn 2012, the General Assembly unanimously passed a resolution calling on leaders in  Washington to reverse the effects of the Citizens United vs. FEC Supreme Court decision, which enshrined corporations as people and their spending of money in elections as protected free speech. Rhode Island is one of twelve states to take such action alongside at least another dozen who are contemplating similar non-binding legislative action. Meanwhile, hundreds of municipalities around the country have passed resolutions likewise calling for the reversal of Citizens United, including Providence and other RI municipalities. Rhode Island also enjoys leadership on this important issue at the federal level from Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, who has spearheaded the initiative to amend the U.S. Constitution. We should be proud of the leadership that has been shown by our political leaders on this issue.

However if you’re like me, you don’t want to hold your breath waiting for things to happen in Washington, D.C. That’s why I got together with some friends and started a Rhode Island affiliate of the Move To Amend coalition. That’s also why we drafted legislation that would allow Rhode Island to be the first state to amend its constitution to abolish corporate personhood. If passed, the bill would put the question on next year’s ballot for the voters to decide. We can be proud that we are the first state in the nation to be considering this move.

The good news is that we have started a petition to support amending the RI Constitution, and in the less than three days it has been up, it already has more than 300 signatures. You can sign it here: http://movetoamend.nationbuilder.com/amend_ri

The less good but still exciting news is that the bill is being heard this Thursday, May 9th in the House Judiciary committee, so there is only a short time to get people on this petition and to the Statehouse for the hearing. I’d be grateful if you can share the petition through social media and email with all your friends. Please also consider coming to the hearing. I’ve made a Facebook event page that allows you to RSVP and spread the word to your friends.

This hearing on Thursday and the subsequent fate of this legislation could prove to be historic steps in the fight to reclaim our democracy from the grip of corporate power. If the bill passes and Rhode Islanders determine that a corporation is not a person as polling suggests they would, there are a lot of potential outcomes and all good for the broader goal of amending the U.S. Constitution.

Students missing math classes needed for NECAP


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Photo by Sam Valorose.
Photo by Sam Valorose.

More than a third of Providence high school students who took the NECAP test in October may not have taken either the necessary algebra or geometry classes to fare well on the test, according to the Providence Student Union. A full13 percent of NECAP test takers haven’t taken either algebra and geometry in school, the two prominent disciplines on the math NECAP.

“How can the commissioner possibly think it is fair to hold kids answerable for material they haven’t been introduced to yet?” said Ken Fish, the former director of middle and high school reform for the state Department of Education, which has made the NECAP test a new graduation requirement. “How can the Board of Education go ahead with this diploma system when the evidence against it continues to grow and grow? This is an unethical policy, and it needs to be put on hold.”

Education Commissioner Deborah Gist has come under intense scrutiny as of late for pushing ahead with an unpopular proposal to use the NECAP test as a graduation requirement. The Providence Student Union, a group of urban high school students who advocate for a student-centric education, have led the protest.

“It’s really just confirmation of what we have been saying all along,” said Monique Taylor, a member of the Providence Student Union and a student at Central High School. “The NECAP is not aligned to our curriculum, so lots of students are being held ‘accountable’ for things we haven’t even been taught yet. How does that make any sense at all?”

Tom Sgouros, writing for this blog, has done substantial research to show that the NECAP isn’t meant to be used as a graduation requirement and that it isn’t an effective tool in measuring individual student performance. His reporting has also shown that RIDE and Gist have tried to cover up these points. Today, he reported that .

PSU members they plan to collect course data from other districts to show that in other urban school districts students aren’t getting the necessary course training to perform well on the NECAP tests.

“The information we have is from Providence, but I bet we’re not the only district with a bunch of students who’ve been set up to fail like this,” said Hector Perea, another PSU member and a student at Hope High School. “We plan to try to get data from other cities, as well, to show how truly ridiculous RIDE’s current policy is.”

What do Seattle, RI pension plans have in common?

seattleSeattle, like Rhode Island, sunk a healthy chunk of its pension investment into hedge funds.  And here’s hoping the Ocean State’s 14 percent foray into these riskier alternative investments works out better than the 8 percent gamble did for the Emerald City.

From Sunday’s Seattle Times:

Shorn of its complexity, the story reads like a financial soap opera.

A decade ago, the pension system for 16,000 current or retired city of Seattle employees invested $20 million in an offshore hedge fund. The secretive hedge fund’s managers made big loans to a prominent Minnesota businessman at extremely lucrative interest rates. Only one problem — he turned out to be running a huge Ponzi scheme.

Officials overseeing the Seattle City Employees’ Retirement System (SCERS) are still paying lawyers to disentangle the resulting mess.

The money they entrusted to Epsilon Investment Management remains in limbo. And the plan has even become ensnared in litigation by the trustee for the Ponzi scheme’s victims.

While no retirement payments are jeopardized by this single deal gone awry, it is a stark reminder of the trouble pension funds can get into by chasing high returns through untraditional investments.

 

Brown U Dems: unsung heroes of marriage equality


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

BrownUMarriage equality has finally come to Rhode Island, the last state in New England to enact full equality for same sex couples! Many organizations took part in this effort, but one group deserves extra special recognition in my mind; young activists, especially the College Democrats of Brown University.

Young people overwhelming support equality for the GLBT/Queer community, and our organizations worked hard to bring our state equality. I know the work of young progressives was the main reason equality has come to Rhode Island. The Young Democrats of Rhode Island’s board of directors certainly put in countless hours door knocking, phone banking and calling our elected officials. However, our work pales in comparison to the College Democrats of Brown University and their parent group the College Democrats of Rhode Island. These college students quietly worked hundreds of hours contacting thousands of voters.

Throughout this entire fight this spring I would receive reports from people working on marriage equality about the hard work of the Brown College Democrats. Every week they organized phone banks with 40 to 50 volunteers and many weekends they were the canvassers knocking on doors. They did this for free and many of them were not fighting for their own right to marry, but they fought for what they new was right.

The Brown College Democrats are not looking to take a victory lap, but they deserve it. They have worked so hard and told so few people about all their great work. Their humility is refreshing in politics. This is not to say other groups did not work hard and helped us win this fight. Many great organizations in the coalition fought for our rights. Including such wonderful organizations as Ocean State Action, and the Progressive Democrats who both fought for equality and all the coalition members deserve praise, but the quiet heroes of this fight are a group of dedicated college students giving their time to help others.

The College Democrats of Brown University and the College Democrats of Rhode Island are a perfect example of the power of young voters to create change in our state and our country. Young people may not be the richest demographic, but we are not afraid to work hard to help others. The college democrats are proof! Without the work of this army of college students and young people, it is unlikely equality would have come to the Ocean State. Their work is important not just to praise but also for candidates and issue groups to take note of the power of young people. From marriage equality, to social justice and the occupy movement and Presidential elections, young people are making their voices heard and winning!

This fight was the largest grassroots army the state has seen in recent memory. It forced our elected leaders off the sidelines and got them to take the tough vote! Rhode Islanders can create the change we seek, and to raise our army of grassroots activists, it cannot be completed without tapping young people including the College Democrats of Rhode Island and the Young Democrats of Rhode Island!

The College Democrats of Brown University deserve praise and thanks from all of us, young and old, who want to live in a state free from discrimination and a place where all are treated equally under the law. As the President of the Young Democrats of Rhode Island and as a proud gay man, I thank the College Democrats for all your work on marriage equality!

Senator Reed supports Rhody Fresh, local farmers

These cows could really cost East Greenwich taxpayers a lot of money if Rodney Bailey decided to stop milking them. Perhaps we should help him keep at it?
These cows could really cost East Greenwich taxpayers a lot of money if Rodney Bailey decided to stop milking them. Perhaps we should help him keep at it?

Perhaps the shrewdest business decision made in 21st Century Rhode Island didn’t occur in a board room, but rather a dairy barn. In 2004, five local dairy farmers – led by Portsmouth icon Louie Escobar, who runs Highland Dairy Farm not far from East Main Road – decided to cut out the corporate middle man and go into business for themselves marketing and selling their milk.

Now Rhody Fresh – an employee-owned cooperative that sells locally made milk (and butter now too!) across the Ocean State – is nine farmers strong (nearly half the dairy industry in RI) and they do more than $3 million in business every year.

But a sustainable agriculture sector is much bigger than just the additional money it puts into our local economy. Food, after all, is actually the third most important part of any economy, after oxygen and clean water (if you don’t have those, your tax rate or regulatory process won’t matter much at all!).

If that’s too abstract for you, read this passage from a recent Mark Patinkin story in the Providence Journal about Rodney and Judy Bailey, who own dairy farmer near where I live:

I pointed out that his land seemed hemmed by a lot of development.

“When I was in grammar school,” said Rodney, “there were 30 to 35 dairy farms in East Greenwich. We’re the last ones. I think we’ve been the last ones for close to 20 years.”

Most, said Judy, decided the land was too valuable not to sell.

If the Bailey’s decide to do what is in their own financial best interest and sell their farm to a real estate developer, my community will need to build a new school to educate all the new children who would move there. Last time my town built a school it cost $32 million.

That’s why Senator Jack Reed will announce today new federal funding to help these local farmers sell local products to local people. We can help too by buying their milk and butter.

Sneaky changes in NECAP documentation


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

gist in egThe NECAP-as-graduation-test has occupied a lot of my attention recently.  As I have written before, the NECAP test is a fundamentally different kind of test than one you would use as a graduation test.  The questions you’d put on a graduation test are exactly the ones that the test designers consider a waste of time and leave off.  This is a matter of relatively simple statistics, and even if it were not, there are plenty of psychometricians (testing experts) who agree with me.

In discussions of this matter, it’s tempting to quote a page from the “Guide to Using the 2012 NECAP Reports” on the subject, and several people have drawn my attention to this passage:

“NECAP is only one indicator of student performance and results of a single NECAP test administration should not be used for referring students to special education or for making promotion and/or graduation decisions.” (page 6)

At a hearing on the matter a couple of weeks ago, a Senator read that passage to Deborah Gist, who replied by pouncing on him to emphasize that the word “single” was the key word in that sentence. She pointed out that giving kids who flunk the opportunity to take the test again complies fully with this caution.

At the time, I wondered how any sentient speaker of English could read that sentence and think the critical word in it was “single.” To me, it seems like a caution against using the test as a graduation test or a special ed placement test. In truth, the sentence is a tad gratuitous, since the statistics of the test say the same thing, and say it in much stronger language. It seems odd to read the sentence any other way. However, if it was my career and reputation that depended on reading it in just the right way, I suppose I too could find a way to claim that never has the word “single” played such an important role in any sentence of the English language.

So imagine my surprise when I learned that the word “single” was added to that sentence in 2011. Measured Progress, the company that designed the NECAP test, publishes a “Guide to Using the NECAP Reports” each year. For the most part the report is just boilerplate, updated each year by changing it slightly to accommodate some of the changes to the test. That year, for example, was the first year for the writing test in the 3-8 grades, so there was some text about that. But before February 2011, when the guide was reporting on the 2009 test, the sentence above — same page, identical rest of the paragraph — read like this:

“NECAP is only one indicator of student performance and should not be used for referring students to special education or for making promotion and/or graduation decisions.”

Let’s have a big hurrah here for the internet archive’s Wayback Machine, from which I learned that the old version was still on the RIDE web site as late as January 18 of this year, and that the change was made for the report on the 2010 results, in early 2011.

What’s interesting to me is that the earlier sentence seems pretty clear — and to be clearly different than it became after 2011. There is no wiggle room in “should not be used.”

More important, this is how the text read back when the NECAP was adopted as a graduation requirement. At that time, it seems that the Department of Education was fairly clearly contradicting the advice of the NECAP designers — who subsequently changed that advice!  Are we to assume that the technical documentation for this test is only advisory?  Or maybe not proofed very well?  Which other simple declarative statements in the documentation are ok for the department to ignore?  Can schools ignore some of it?  How about students?

Or is it only the people who pay Measured Progress who can get them to change their advice?

The guides for the NECAP science tests were never changed — after all, they’re not used for graduation tests — so they continue to read just as the reading and math guide did before 2011. (The 2011 science report is here.  A friend downloaded the 2012 report a few weeks ago, but there appears to be no link to it any more on this page, so maybe they’re changing that one now, too.)

What we’re talking about here is dishonesty. This isn’t the same as simple dishonesty, or lying. This is intellectual dishonesty, and here’s the problem with that. The world is what it is. The facts of the world do not care about your opinion, or your triumph in some argument. Intellectual honesty is important in science because it’s the only way to get our understanding of the world to approach the world.  Fudge your results, and you’ll find that your cure for cancer doesn’t work, that your miracle glue is really an explosive, or that your economic policy just makes things worse. This is why science is supposed to progress by scientists checking and criticizing each others results: that’s how you maintain intellectual honesty. Sometimes the disputes get personal or political and distract from the real aim, but the real aim is to get at the truth via intellectual honesty, enforced by the scientific community.

The truth is that the NECAP wasn’t designed to be a graduation test, and this was obvious from the very beginning. It has been coerced into the role not because it was good for kids, but because it was cheaper than designing a dedicated graduation test. The features that make it a bad graduation test are objectively true facts about the test and its design. Neither editing technical documentation, committee-hearing filibusters, or cutting off public comment at Board of Education meetings will change those facts.

I have no doubt at all that the commissioner can fend off challenges from the public over these matters, indefinitely. But reality will — as it usually does — have the last word. And children will pay the price. The question for Board of Education members, legislators, school administrators, teachers, and parents is which side they want to be on.

Rep. Valencia continues push for tax equity


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Larry ValenciaRep. Larry Valencia is charging hard at injustice and promoting progressive values in the General Assembly.

This Democrat serving  Hopkinton, Exeter, and Richmond voted ‘Yea’ on marriage equality, is a cosponsor of the marijuana legalization bill, the lead sponsor of the repeal of Voter ID, cosponsors Rep. Maria Cimini’s Tax Equity bill, and has also introduced a tax equity bill of his own (H5805) that would actually bump Rhode Island’s top earners tax rate by 4 percent. Cimini’s bill (H5374) calls for a 2 percent bump. Valencia is calling the bill the “Double Cimini.”

Specifically, Valencia’s bill would raise tax rates on individuals earning over $200,000 and couples earning over $250,000 by 4 percent. Valencia estimates that the rate increase would raise an additional $130 million-plus in annual revenue for the state.

Valencia would like the additional revenues to be put towards creating an Office of Inspector General to improve departmental oversight in the state, shoring up social programs for the developmentally disabled, and relieving some of the burden on those who are on fixed incomes, the elderly, and Rhode Island’s veterans.

[vsw id=”fEG5SH3-V-o” source=”youtube” width=”525″ height=”344″ autoplay=”no”]

At a press conference on Wednesday, Valencia touted the bill as a way to, “correct the current imbalance of tax burden that has been place on working families and small businesses with a fair and modest solution, while also addressing our revenue crisis.”

In his position on the House Finance Committee, Valencia is privy to some downright scary fiscal projections for the state.  Some show that the states structural deficit could balloon to nearly $500 million for fiscal year 2018. “We need some changes in the revenue side, as well as some judicious cuts in spending.”

“Some of our leaders have maintained unsustainable tax breaks for the wealthy based on the premise that it would bring jobs back to Rhode Island. After 15 years and millions of dollars in tax cuts for the wealthy, our state has one of the highest unemployment rates in the country,” Ocean State Action’s Kristina Fox offered, “to put it bluntly: it didn’t work and it is time to try something new.”

The Young Democrats of Rhode Island are supporting this bill. Alex Morash called income tax reform, “…vitally important to complete a picture of Rhode Island that works for everyone. We’re not asking for a handout. We’re asking for a fair shot in an economy that works for all Rhode Islanders.”

One would think that  local mayors, administrators, and council members would be clamoring to support this bill, especially in Rhode Island’s most distressed communities, but bill proponents have yet to approach local legislators for support.  “I don’t know if we’re at that stage yet. Building support for legislation like this takes time,” Valencia said. This is the third year that he has introduced the bill.

“Equal protection from environmental hazards cannot happen in Rhode Island without tax fairness,” said Amelia Rose, Director of the Environmental Justice League of RI, “Our Department of Environmental Management is underfunded and the budget continues to be cut. This has slowed the remediation of brownfields in urban areas, which directly affects the quality of life of the predominantly immigrant and low-income people that live in these areas.”

Local policy researcher and sometime RI Future contributor, who crunched many of the numbers in the bill, offered these points. “Opponents of tax equity, what they’re implicitly saying, is that this problem of appeasing rich people is the biggest problem that we’re facing today. My question to them is: Are you sure?”

Valencia, not satisfied with simply increasing revenue, has also introduced legislation that would create the office of an Inspector General in the state. The office would provide oversight to all divisions of government in the state, in an effort to make sure that the investments that we do make are prudent and returns on those investments are realized.

Businesses behaving badly


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

pyramid-of-capitalismIn past posts, I have explained actions that businesses–usually large corporations–have taken that are decidedly contrary to the interests of the general public. For this, commentors have claimed that I’m anti-business, that I’m using scare tactics, I’m just a socialist, or some combination thereof.

However, in the news over the past month or so we have seen two excellent examples of Business Behaving Badly. The first, of course, was the decision of MetLife to summarily fire all of its Life Administration employees here in RI and other parts of the Northeast and across the country, in order to move those jobs to North Carolina. MetLife is firing these people in order to pad its already high profits: $1.4 Bn for 2012. That seems to be contrary to the interests of the general public.

And yes, these people are being fired. There is no other word that accurately describes what is happening. Fired. For no fault of their own. Without cause. With no justification other than it better suits Met’s interests. A lot of these people have worked loyally for Met for periods often measured in decades. The reward for loyal service is to be fired.

How does that fit with the propaganda that the free market will take care of employees better than any government? Answer, it doesn’t. What it does do is illustrate to perfection how a corporation will take care of its own needs, regardless of the number of lives that are damaged in the process. It’s all about increasing the benefits that flow in a torrent to those already at the apex of the financial pyramid.

The second example is the explosion of the fertilizer plant in West, Texas. Now, from what I can gather, this plant was not part of some multinational corporation. A company like Met could have bought and sold it out of the spare change in the couch cushions. But it was a business, run for profit. One way of increasing profit is to cut corners on safety issues. Despite the fact that ammonium nitrate was the explosive of choice used by Timothy McVeigh in the Oklahoma City bombing, those in charge of the fertilizer plant did not consider this a safety risk, Records indicate that the risk that concerned them most was the possibility of a leak of ammonia gas. This would be a bad thing, but not catastrophic.

So the company took no steps to mitigate the possible risk. Why not? Because they did not see the need, and taking steps would have cost money.

Now, it appears that no one in the town particularly blames the company, and the company was certainly not a rapacious corporation hell-bent on increasing profit. Still, the fact remains that no safety precautions were taken, and fifteen people are dead because of the lack of precautions.

The third example is the worst and most blatant of all: the collapse of the building in Bangladesh.

One thing we all hear about is the need for ‘common sense’. Doesn’t it seem that ‘common sense’ should include taking precautions to reduce the risk of a fire at a plant that stores large quantities of highly-explosive material? If you’re making dynamite, shouldn’t you build risk-mitigation into your plans? And ammonium nitrate, in the quantities on hand at the fertilizer plant is every bit as dangerous as dynamite. You can take Timothy McVeigh’s word on that. Doesn’t ‘common sense’ tell you to build a building so it won’t collapse?

It also appears that the fertilizer company may not have actually broken any laws. That also seems to be part of the problem. The plant is in Texas, and Texas prides itself on being a land of lax regulation. So fifteen people died so Texas could maintain its macho image of ‘hands-off’ conservatism. IOW, it’s more like Bangladesh, and less like the rest of the US that foolishly insists on standards. More, 68 people have died in mining accidents in the new millennium. The common thread of all these deaths is the lack of safety precautions. Why did the companies in question not take proper precautions? Because they cost money, and no one made them take the precautions.

In many ways, the impression is that the West Fertilizer Company was actually a fairly benign employer. In many ways, that only makes things worse. If this is how a well-intentioned company acts, how much worse are those actively looking for corners to cut?

This is how business will operate in an unregulated, or lightly-regulated market. Most businesses will be responsible, but there will always be a few who don’t. And when these businesses behave irresponsibly, and profit from this lack of concern, others will mimic that behavior and start cutting corners, too. And people will die. And it doesn’t have to be a business like mining, or fertilizer production with their built-in dangers; it could be the result of locked or nonexistent emergency exits, as happened in the Hamlet, NC chicken plant fire where 25 people died, or the even more horrific Triangle Shirtwaist fire, which killed over 140 people.

We are told that regulations in the US are too onerous. That they cost businesses money, and so jobs. We are told we need to lighten the regulatory burden on business, so that we can create jobs. IOW, we need to become more like Bangladesh, with its light (non-existent? Certainly not-enforced) regulations, no unions, and starvation wages for its employees.

You get what you pay for.

This is what happens when businesses are left to police themselves. Things are no different now than they were a century ago.

 

The NRA, Bilbo Baggins, URI and Teny Oded Gross


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Teny Oded Gross sounds off to State House reporters. (Photos by Ryan T. Conaty.
Teny Oded Gross sounds off to State House reporters. (Photo by Ryan T. Conaty.

Just like it did in Congress, it looks like the NRA will beat back stricter gun laws at the Rhode Island State House as well, reports Sam Bell of the Rhode Island Progressive Democrats.

“Rhode Islanders favor an assault weapons ban by a margin of 64% to 27%, but we aren’t hearing from them,” Rep. Linda Finn told him. “We’re just hearing from the NRA.”

Is anyone surprised by this? Or even think it’s at all newsworthy that the NRA is more politically powerful than the entire progressive left on this issue here in Rhode Island? Of course not!

We live in a culture dominated by violence. Today in Rhode Island we are celebrating the Haymarket riot and tomorrow there is a State House ceremony honoring the burning of the Gaspee. These are two acts of terrorism that we celebrate for their historical significance. The other weekend, to escape the horrible reality of the Boston bombings and subsequent manhunt, I watched a fantasy movie called The Hobbit. It was about magical forest creatures who have been at bloody war with each other for 60 years.

But one of the most tacitly violence-condoning actions in our violence-dominated society is the totally outlandish notion that Americans have a right to a gun just in case anyone wants to wage a war against the government. Teny Oded Gross, of the Institute for the Study and Practice of Nonviolence, put it this way to Ian Donnis of RIPR:

“As far as I know [the US] is the first democracy on the planet that is actually saying you should arm yourself against your own citizens. That is actually outlandish. I’m surprised there’s not more outrage about that.”

I really don’t care what constitutional scholars think about the wording of the Second Amendment, I’m pretty certain this is a societal recipe for disaster.

While we may not be able to beat back the NRA at the State House, we can support the Institute for the Study & Practice of Nonviolence out in the real world. In fact, you can do so tonight.

A URI journalism “digital immersion” class has spent the semester making content for the Institute and they will be showing it off tonight at the downtown Providence campus on Washington Street from 6 to 8 p.m. If you plan on being at the State House tonight to testify, please stop by this exhibit. And if you’re going to this exhibit, please go to the State House to testify for stricter gun control in Rhode Island.

Here’s an example of their work, which explains more about what the Institute does:

Here’s more on the event tonight:

digital immersion class

Environmental advocates take to the State House

Environmental Groups lobbied legislators en masse on Tuesday. (L to R Mike Roles, Tricia Jedele, Gov. Lincoln Chafee, Nicole Pollock, Rep. Art Handy, and Francis Pullaro of RENEW NE.
Environmental Groups lobbied legislators en masse on Tuesday. (L to R Mike Roles, Tricia Jedele, Gov. Lincoln Chafee, Nicole Pollock, Rep. Art Handy, and Francis Pullaro of RENEW NE. Resource Recovery’s MaxMan looks on.

Each year, the Environment Council of Rhode Island (ECRI) holds a legislative lobby day allowing everyday folks who care about the environment to lobby their legislators to protect laws that protect our environment and voice opposition to bills that they see as detrimental to the first resort’s ecosystems.

The Environment Council of Rhode Island was  founded in 1972, and includes over 60 Rhode Island organizations that advocate for protection of natural habitats  and sensitive ecosystems, clean air, water and soil, and more recently, to address the coming scourge of global climate change.

“We strive to be the sound voice for environmental policy in Rhode Island,” said Tricia Jedele, President of ECRI,”We advocate for clean air and water because it’s the right thing to do, but we also advocate for these issues because we understand that the environment and economy are inextricably linked.”

ECRI Vice-president, Mike Roles, laid out the legislative priorities for the day. ECRI identified 35 pieces of legislation for action this year, and whittled that list down to 8 major bills. Their citizen lobbyists will be  for reintroduction of RIPTA funding to the DOT’s sustainable funding formula – but will in no way affect the DOT funding – and a statewide cesspool phaseout. They also lobbied against the new school siting law, and

It’s really difficult to build a strong backing for environmental protection on Smith Hill. All too often the economy and the environment are  pitted against one another. “But after (Hurricane) Sandy, last year’s blizzard, and the flood of 2010, that is starting to change, “said Rep. Art Handy, Chair of the House Environment and Agriculture Committee, “people are beginning to realize that is largely not the case.”

Handy has introduced H5801, the Energy Independence and  Climate Solutions Act, which would deem that the Department of Environmental Management take an “inventory” of the state’s greenhouse gas emissions,  and to set goals  as to curtail them.

One environmental bill that has received some attention is the potential to ban plastic checkout bags. ECRI member group, Environment RI successfully collected 7,300 signatures in support of a statewide ban on plastic shopping bags, but it looks unlikely that the bill will pass out of committee at this point.

“Our partnerships with ECRI and other non-profits is smart, and makes us more effective in mission,” said Nicole Pollock, DEM’s legislative liaison, “we’ve accomplished a lot, but we still haven’t done enough. There are meetings yet to be held, ideas yet to be shared, and rallies that need to happen.

“We want to have the best of everything,” added Governor Lincoln Chafee, “that includes the best environmental protection laws and regulations.”

Rhode Island celebrates International Workers’ Day


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Happy May Day, Rhode Island! Most of the globe calls it International Workers Day , though it’s a largely ignored holiday here in the States. To celebrate locally, meet at Central High School in Providence at 3:30 for a march to the State House expected to arrive at roughly 5; more info here. And here’s a video from the 2011 May day celebration in Rhode Island.

May Day honors organized labor’s epic and transformational struggle for an eight-hour workday, perhaps the greatest gift the union movement has given the entire working class. It may also be labor’s most hard-fought victory as well. May Day also marks the anniversary of the Haymarket Affair. More on that excellent cautionary historical tale from Wikipedia, Chicago Historical Society and please make sure to read the post URI history professor and local labor expert Erik Loomis, who wrote a history piece for RI Future this morning.

may day2012

 

The origins of May Day


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

HaymarketRiot-HarpersToday is May Day, the workers’ holiday. At least in most nations. But not the United States. The story of May Day goes back to Chicago in 1866.

On March 4, 1886, during a protest march against police brutality in Chicago’s Haymarket Square, a bomb went off in the middle of a group of policemen, killing 7 officers. The aftermath of the Haymarket bombing showed the fear American capitalists had of working-class ideologies, the lack of civil liberties during the Gilded Age, and the tenuousness of labor organizations during these years of class formation.

The mid-1880s saw the native-born working class struggling to understand the new labor system of the Gilded Age. With the promises of mutually respectful employer-employee relations at the center of early Republican free labor ideology shown to be a farce and workers living increasing desperate lives in dirty and dangerous factories and condemned to poverty, the American working-class sought to even the playing field between employer and employee. The Knights of Labor promised the eight-hour day; in a period when labor looked for a single panacea to solve all problems rather than a deep class analysis of labor-employer relations, the working-class jumped to the idea. The Knights, led by Terence Powderly, grew rapidly in the mid-1880s, even though Powderly didn’t really envision the organization as a radical challenge to capitalism. Still, “Eight Hours for Work, Eight Hours for Sleep, Eight Hours for What You Will” became the slogan for a million or more Americans. But Powderly’s control over the organization was tenuous and with the Knights defined as open to all workers, it meant that anarchists and other radicals could easily join and then try to convert workers to their cause.

The center of 8-hour organizing was in Chicago, where small numbers of radicals began organizing workers to demand the 8-hour day and threaten a general strike if denied. On May 1, 1886, between 300,000 and 500,000 workers walked off their job around the nation. Probably 80,000 of those workers were in Chicago. The police responded with sadly predictable violence. On May 3, police murdered 6 strikers at the McCormick Harvesting Machine plant. The McCormick workers had battled with their employer for a year, who had hired Pinkertons to beat them. They combined their already existing struggle with the 8-hour day to become some of the most respected working-class militants in the city. Responding to the murders, labor called a march to protest police violence the next day at Haymarket Square, which somewhere between 1000-3000 people attended.

When the police moved in on the marchers, someone threw a bomb. The police responded by firing into the marchers, killing a disputed number (probably between 4 and 8) before cease-firing, fearful they would shoot each other in the darkness and confusion. Maybe 50 people on both sides were wounded. Unsure who actually threw the bomb, authorities just rounded up all the leading anarchists they could find and tried them for the murder. Despite the lack of evidence, 7 were sentenced to death and another to 15 years in prison. Of the 8, only 2 had even attended the Haymarket event and neither of the two were even suspected of throwing the bomb. But in the nation’s first Red Scare (even if we usually associated that term with post-World War I repression), thoughts mattered more than actions; leading 8-hour day actions meant you might as well be a bomb-throwing anarchist.

Among the convicted was Albert Richard Parsons. Born in Alabama, Parsons grew up in frontier Texas in the 1850s. Although he volunteered for the Confederacy as a young man, he became a southern white Republican in the years after the war. Parsons repudiated his Confederate past and supported not only the principles of Reconstruction but voting rights for African-Americans. He then married a part-black, part-Mexican woman named Lucy Gonzalez. Gonzalez (later Lucy Parsons) had a long and amazing career of her own, including being at the founding of the Industrial Workers of the World in 1905, fighting with Emma Goldman over the role sex should play in anarchist politics (she thought class was more important), leading the defense of the Scottsboro Boys, and inspiring the young Studs Terkel in the 1930s and early 1940s. Anyway, Parsons and Gonzalez were forced out of Texas due to intolerance to both their political beliefs and their interracial marriage. They moved to Chicago where they both wrapped themselves in the political maelstrom of the time. Parsons became a socialist newspaper editor, attended the first convention of the National Labor Union in 1876, and in 1880, withdrew from electoral politics to immerse himself in anarchism. He became obsessed with the 8-hour day and in 1884 began an anarchist newspaper in support of the idea.

Parsons was not at the Haymarket protest. But as a leading anarchist, one in an interracial marriage for that matter, he was suspect and hated by the forces of order. He was convicted of murder and hanged, with 3 others, on November 11, 1887.

The aftermath of Haymarket completely destroyed the Knights of Labor and the 8-hour movement. Powderly repudiated the violence but was also totally unprepared for every part of the situation, from the size of the Knights to the official repression of labor radicalism. The Knights crumbled soon after and though workers still dreamed of the 8-hour day, it would take another half-century and countless dead workers to see it become a reality.

As for May Day, the Haymarket Riot became a major cause for socialists and anarchists throughout the United States and Europe. In 1889, the Second International, a meeting of socialists from around the world, called for international demonstrations on May 1, 1890 to remember the Haymarket martyrs. In 1891, it made this the official Workers’ Holiday. But in the United States, May Day plays second fiddle to Labor Day. In 1894, facing widespread condemnation for government support of crushing the Pullman Strike in Chicago, President Grover Cleveland rushed to sign legislation creating a Labor Day in September as the official workers’ holiday. He feared that celebrating May Day would benefit socialist and anarchist movements.


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387