Elderly, disabled and homeless march on RIPTA


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

2016-05-23 RIPTA 002Red Bandana Award winner Artermis Moonhawk lead a group of homeless, elderly and disabled people and allies carrying signs demanding that RIPTA re-institute the no-fare bus pass system. The protesters marched from McAuley House on Elmwood Avenue to the RIPTA Board of Director’s meeting on Melrose Street Monday afternoon. After the quarter mile walk the marchers were told that the board room was filled to capacity and that many people, including the elderly and disabled, might have to wait in the hallway for their turn to participate in the public comment portion of the meeting.

Peering into the room, one woman pointed out that there were still empty seats inside the meeting room. When told that the room’s occupancy had been reached at 40 people, she asked why there were more than 40 chairs then. No answer was immediately provided.

At issue is Rhode Island Public Transportation Authority‘s decision, per last year’s General Assembly budget, to do away with free bus fare for the elderly, disabled and homeless, and instead institute a 50 cent charge. While it is true that RIPTA’s free bus fare is generous, as Randall Rose testified before the House Finance committee, “We don’t have to be ashamed of who we are in Rhode Island. We don’t have to be ashamed that we’re more generous than other states because we’re doing the right thing…”

Even as Rhode Island seeks to do away with no-fare system, the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Board unanimously voted to approve a no-fare system for seniors and disabled. Similar systems exist in communities in Pennsylvania, Illionois, Oregon, Texas and Wisconsin.

2016-05-23 RIPTA 001

2016-05-23 RIPTA 003

2016-05-23 RIPTA 004

2016-05-23 RIPTA 005

2016-05-23 RIPTA 006

2016-05-23 RIPTA 007

2016-05-23 RIPTA 008

2016-05-23 RIPTA 009

2016-05-23 RIPTA 010

2016-05-23 RIPTA 011

2016-05-23 RIPTA 012

2016-05-23 RIPTA 013

2016-05-23 RIPTA 014

2016-05-23 RIPTA 015

2016-05-23 RIPTA 016

2016-05-23 RIPTA 017

2016-05-23 RIPTA 018

Patreon

Senator Conley suing to prevent Memorial Hospital closure


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
20160518_151543
Chris Callaci, Rep David Coughlin, Sen William Conley

“As we speak the defendants in that lawsuit are being served,” said Senator William Conley, who serves Pawtucket and East Providence. “The cities of Pawtucket and Central Falls have Filed a lawsuit against Care New England, The RI Department of Health and the Attorney General’s Office. Through that lawsuit we’re asking the court to enjoin the dismantling of Memorial Hospital and make sure that those services continue while we go through this process of restructuring South Coast.”

Care New England, which manages Memorial Hospital in Pawtucket,  announced the closing on March 2. Since then there have been public hearings and rallies, but the plan to close the hospital seems to be continuing. Over 200 jobs are threatened. Conley is working pro bono as the lawyer on the case, and his work will compliment rather than complicate the legal work of Attorney Chris Callaci, who is representing the nurses union, UNAP 5082 in their efforts to keep Memorial open.

“When Memorial was licensed,” said Senator Conley, “a determination was made that this hospital was providing vital medical services to a core service area with higher social deprivation demographics than any other place in the state of Rhode island.

“That alone should be enough to tell us that you can’t relocate those services to Kent County.”

Patreon

More confusion, not clarity, from the Burrillville Town Council


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
John Pacheco
Council President John Pacheco III

At the second “special meeting” of the Burrillville Town Council, held as a semi-official “workshop” to allow discussion of various aspects of Invenergy‘s plan to build a fracked gas and diesel oil burning electrical plant in the town, the agenda, entitled “Hour on Power II” claimed that the “fundamentals of municipal tax agreements” would be discussed. Potential tax agreements with Invenergy are a very contentious issue, because under state law, as explained by Conservation Law Foundation Senior Attorney Jerry Elmer, Burillville has the right to set the property taxes on the plant at any level it chooses, yet Town Solicitor Oleg Nikolyszyn, it seems, disagrees, maintaining that the Town must negotiate a fair tax treaty with Invenergy.

Expecting that there would be expert legal advice on offer, many residents made the trip to this special meeting, only to find that there were no lawyers or expert advice on offer. Instead, the Town Council introduced Dr. Robin Muksian, a resident of Burrillville who currently serves as executive director of operations for the Providence School Department. She holds a Ph.D. in rhetoric and composition. Speaking as someone with some experience in negotiating deals between the state and private citizens, (she claims to have once lost a strip of land to the state in some kind of imminent domain situation) Muksian said that under state law, the town “must” negotiate with Invenergy, they can’t just set the tax at what ever rate they wish. Jerry Elmer explained otherwise, quite clearly, here.

Muksian misquoted the statute, advancing the idea that under state law 44-3-30, Burrillville “must negotiate” with Invenergy for a fair tax treaty, when the law actually states that town may “determine, by ordinance or resolution, an amount of taxes to be paid each year”. The plain text of the law does not contain the word negotiate, and if other laws on the books do contain such a provision, it does not matter, because 44-3-30 starts with the words, “Notwithstanding any other provisions of the general laws to the contrary,” meaning that 44-3-30 supersedes any other laws governing such negotiations.

Muksian also admitted to coming to the power plant issue late, and that she hadn’t attended any of the Energy Facility Siting Board (EFSB) meetings held in the town so far. This might explain why she thought that residents could bring questions to the EFSB, instead of just comments. The EFSB does not respond to residents at these meetings, yet Muksian said that questions should be brought to the EFSB at these meetings.

Under questioning from Burrillville resident Paul Lefebvre, Muksian at first dodged the question of whether or not she opposed the building of the new power plant. It took Lefebvre several questions before Muksian reluctantly said that she opposes the plant. For some reason she seemed at first to strike a more neutral position.

Most of Muksian’s talk is in the first half hour of the video below. Note that the meeting took place in Burrillville’s beautiful Assembly Theater, which was dark and not kind to video or photography. The Town Council is on the stage, well lit. The rest of those in attendance, not so much.

Many in attendance were asking themselves why Muksian was given so much time to expound on legal issues she was clearly not qualified to speak about. She constantly prefaced her comments by saying that she was “speaking as a resident of Burrillville” and that she wasn’t a lawyer. That raised an important question for the Town Council that went unanswered: Why Muksian and not any other non-lawyer resident of Burrillville?

After the meeting a resident told me that there is a rumor that Muksian is being considered for the position of Town Manager. Michael Wood, the current Town Manager, was not in attendance at the meeting, and Council President John Pacheco, from the stage, made a pointed comment about Wood’s contract being up for renewal in February of 2017. During the meeting, when a resident suggested that Michael Wood be fired, there was a standing ovation.

Wood has alienated many in the town with what one resident characterized as his “imperious” attitude. Further, in the April 23 Burrillville Bugle, delivered to every resident’s mailbox every month, Wood made comments that seemed to indicate his support for the new power plant and disregarded the environmental and health concerns of residents. For instance, he said, “the negative effects of the existing power plant, Ocean State, is not “anything to be overly concerned about.” Many feel that the over all tenor of his comments in the Bugle indicate that he supports building the plant.

DSC_1399
Town Councillor Kimberly Brissette-Brown

As a result, the residents of Burrillville distrust Wood’s judgement when it comes to the hiring of experts to review the proposed plant’s impact on health, environment, wildlife, water quality, noise etc. They also distrust his ability to negotiate with Invenergy wisely, with the best interests of the town in mind.

A breath of fresh air came to the meeting about 82 minutes into it. Barry Craig, an actual lawyer (though not one licensed to practice law in Rhode Island) and a Burrillville resident, rose to call out the Town Council and Town Solicitor Oleg Nikolyszyn on what he termed their timidity in dealing with Invenergy.

Craig attended the first EFSB meeting in Burrillville. He thought, “it was very poorly managed.” He called the set up of the meeting, with the applicants (Invenergy’s Director of Development John Niland and his lawyers) on stage and the residents of Burrillville below them in the seats of the auditorium was “an insult.”

Craig said that to defeat this plant, the residents of Burrillville, through their Town Council, must “vigorously oppose” the plant. Craig came to the special town council meeting last night because he read the legal opinions of Town Solicitor Nikolyszyn, made in response to questions posed by residents. “At best,” said Craig, “I read these responses as being timid, at worst I read these responses as responses that discourage action rather than encourage action.”

For instance, the proper answer to the question, “Can the town council find new solutions to prevent locating the power plant in Burrillville?” isn’t to note that the EFSB has enormous power, the answer, says Craig, is, “Can we find creative ways of dealing with this issue? … Anything that delays this project makes it less likely… Companies like this work on a time schedule. If they can’t get a project done within a particular time frame they move onto the next project.”

One thing that became very clear in last night’s Burrillville Town council meeting is that discussing complex legal issues without lawyers present is a waste of time. Perhaps Muksian’s appearance was an audition for a future job, perhaps she’s just a citizen who waded into waters over her head, but her advice and commentary were worse than a waste of time: They spread dangerous misinformation, misinformation that will weaken the Town’s resolve and ability to fight Invenergy’s plans for the town.

Burrillville doesn’t need more bullshit. Burrillville needs courageous leadership ready to fight Invenergy with everything they have, or they will be living with the first of a series of such power plants very soon.

Patreon

Burrillville rallies against power plant at Siting Board hearing, part II


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

2016-05-10 EFSB 05By the end of the nearly four hours of testimony before the Energy Facilities Siting Board (EFSB) concerning Invenergy‘s proposed fracked gas and diesel oil burning power plant in Burrillville on Tuesday night, 41 people had spoken. Six people spoke in favor of the plant, mostly union laborers hoping for jobs. One person gave testimony that was difficult to follow, so I’m not sure if he supported or opposed the plant, and one man spoke twice. Thirty four people, mostly Burrillville residents, spoke against the plant, often emotionally but just as often with hard facts.

The hearing was actually a continuation of the first public comment meeting, held March 30. That hearing was better attended by both the residents of Burrillville and the union, but it’s possible attendance was down due to a misleading advertisement place in the Bargain Buyer by Invenergy. The meeting was better run this time. EFSB Chairperson Margaret Curran set out the rules and the timing early, and for the most part the process went smoothly, though sometimes things became heated between residents and the laborers. There were many police officers on duty, both state and local. At one point I counted nine.

The hearing also acted as our introduction to this ongoing drama’s latest cast member, Parag Agrawal, the new Associate Director at the RI Division of Planning. For the first time the EFSB functioned with a full board. The third member is Janet Coit, Director of RI’s Department of Environmental Management.

Below find all the testimony, in order.

Ten year old Briella Bailey got the evening off to a good start when she spoke the the Energy Facilities Siting Board (EFSB). Bailey went over her allotted five minutes, and her testimony played well with those in attendance, so it would have been a bad move for Curran to cut her off. Besides, Bailey wasn’t the last person to go over time.

Amanda Mainville gave very cool testimony, comparing Invenergy’s Director of Development John Niland to the villain of the Dr. Suess classic, The Lorax. It was the first of two Dr. Suess references of the night.

Paul MacDonald, Burrillville resident and President of the Providence Central Federated Council and Legislative Director of Teamsters Local 251 spoke in favor of the power plant. His testimony was more nuanced than that given by union members and leaders at the last hearing. In a nod towards the concerns of environmentalists, MacDonald maintained that, “If the environment cannot support it, I’m against it.”

Part of Invenergy’s plan is to use well water contaminated by MTBE to cool the turbines. Burrillville’s legacy with this dangerous gasoline additive is painfully explored in the testimony given below. The people of Burrillville have already suffered through one toxic nightmare. They are loathe to invite another into their lives.

More incredible and brave testimony from Donna Woods. Her personal story is extrememely powerful…

Linda Nichols is considering a run for office. Her testimony might just be her first step towards getting elected.

2016-05-10 EFSB 06

2016-05-10 EFSB 05

2016-05-10 EFSB 04

2016-05-10 EFSB 03

2016-05-10 EFSB 02

2016-05-10 EFSB 01

Patreon

Our right to a healthy workplace


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Workplace BullyingThe following is testimony given before the Senate Labor committee on S2377, the Healthy Workplace Bill.

I wish there were no need to convince anyone that we should all have the chance to work in Healthy Workplaces. It sounds like a no brainer. Of course there should be healthy workplaces. Why do I think there is a need to talk about having them? Don’t we already have them?

We are being ever more productive and successful in our businesses, aren’t we, when many CEO’s are earning billion dollar salaries?

Oh I must be talking about businesses and companies different from that.

Actually, no. In every kind of business, every kind of employee, male, female, of all races and income levels can almost expect at some point to be harassed, humiliated, isolated, mobbed (when coworkers side with the bully against the target), gas lighted (pressured to think that they are no longer competent), have their work sabotaged, have lies told about them, have black marks falsely made against their records, be screamed at and excoriated in public or behind closed doors with great regularity followed by being wrongfully terminated.

After such vicious attacks, people are having and often dying of heart attacks, strokes and even committing suicide. There is no quality of life in our workplaces where these toxic conditions exist despite the corporate slogans to achieve, be the best you can be, do more-better- faster.

There is great denial about this happening and there is great misunderstanding about why.

A lot of people think that bosses need to be tough on employees; that employees are by and large lazy and unmotivated, but this simply is not true. In any case, treating people with ever increasing cruelty does nothing for their productivity and therefore the productivity of any business.

The problem as I see it is that money has become our sole indicator of success along with a top down approach to management. Management likes to promote middle managers who will do what they are told but aren’t necessarily the most competent in the actual field of expertise they are managing.

I believe that when those types of middle managers, or others, see productive people around them but they see their job is solely to control others for the top managers, they can feel incompetent and lash out at their underlings – often in staggering displays of violence – either psychological or actual physical onslaughts which can last years. Extreme bullying can take place as the “control message” is passed from upper management down. For example, I and many others witnessed my manager’s boss scream at my manager full blast for 20 minutes in the open. She and everyone around her were out sick the next day. I felt sick hearing the onslaught.

Both targets of bullying and the perpetrators are terrified of losing their jobs so the bullies attack harder and the targets absorb the abuse, initially too terrified to do much of anything in their attempt to survive.

Families, partners and spouses often measure their successes in money as well, often not wanting to notice the ill health of the person making the money, the stress, nervousness, fear at revealing the problem then cut off if they say anything about being bullied at work. The shame.

It also boggles my mind that so much vicious negative energy is expended to indulge in bullying or what I often call “kick the dog” behavior: “I don’t feel that great but making you cringe might help.”

How could that energy be used, instead, to encourage others toward higher objectives, be actually productive, creative or active in the development of the goals of the manager themselves, their employees and the company? I often wondered what my manager had in mind by attacking me daily with literally hundreds of emails and instant messages per day which delayed getting the clients what they expected.

I personally know of two men here in Rhode Island who died of heart attacks following being bullied out of their jobs before retirement. I witnessed many people who were pillars of Quest Diagnostics in Cambridge get bullied from their jobs just before retirement.  Their fear at being rehired at their age must have been staggering along with the damage they sustained from being in such a hostile work environment for years. Not only that, the spouses of the Rhode Islanders and even family members were unwittingly no help to them as they feared THEIR livelihood threatened by the possible loss of their husband’s job – “Oh stick with it, dear. EVERYONE has a tough boss.” Imagine the pressure – both at home and at work. Compounded. Isolated.

On the other hand, if the spouse, partner or family member IS supportive, then they are volunteering for the extreme roller coaster of the bully’s whims and how it affects the target. Is he or she going to be not so abusive today or will we have to plan to have the target go out on medical leave because of how the inevitable illness of being so harassed presents itself?

Workplace Bullying is an extreme abuse of power and must be stopped – literally –  before more people die.

There was a Vietnam Vet named Ernie LaVoie who worked at the Oxford Public works in Massachusetts. I am told he always had a kind word for everyone. He was routinely harassed for years by his coworkers and managers. Often the nicest people are harassed because they pose no threat. He asked to use a particular piece of equipment in his work, was denied and as an indication he had had it with all the long term abuse, he hung himself on that piece of equipment. He was not weak, disturbed or crazy – the bullies fit those categories. I tell his story to honor Ernie, his friends, coworkers who witnessed and reported his distress and his family.

I lost a dear friend on April 14th in Wisconsin, Cheryll Nelson, who founded a healing group for targets of bullying on Facebook – her own family and husband did not believe she was going thru what she was experiencing. She could not keep up with the demands of two jobs rolled into one at the school where she was the speech therapist and Medicaid biller – not how her job was presented to her originally. She lost track of her health in her attempt to keep up with her work and died after her heart stopped while in a medically induced coma for her out of control pneumonia. She wrote a letter to her manager that she never sent but we in the group got it. Once she died one of our members sent it to the bully. At Cheryll’s funeral, the bully accosted her family who then attacked all of us verbally.

I know personally a man at my church here in Rhode Island who, along with many other teachers at the same school, was taken from his job on a stretcher.

Of course, I need not tell anyone that this should not be happening. What I AM asking is for you to help me and help all of us stop this inhumane activity by giving legal recourse to targets of bullying as presented in S2377 the Healthy Workplace Bill.

If this is what it takes to motivate employers to start treating employees like the valuable producers of the very goods and services that make the company, healthcare organization or business successful, then this is what we must do.

Our conscience, people’s lives and the health of our country demand it.

Special Town Council meeting does little to calm Burrillvillian concerns


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

2016-05-04 Burrillville Town Council 02“I don’t [want to] throw cold water on your parade here,” said Burrillville Town Manager Michael Wood, “but you can’t simply just determine a tax at will and tax somebody… It’s not fair to leave you with the impression that this can be done when it can’t be done.”

Problem is, Wood is wrong.

Wood was speaking to around 150 Burrillville residents at a “Town Council Special Meeting” held to answer questions and concerns regarding Invenergy’s proposed $750 million fracked gas and diesel oil burning electrical plant.

Nick Katkevich, from the Fang Collective, had just read from aloud the relevant passage from the RI General Laws concerning Burrillville and energy plant taxation, as quoted in RI Future:

44-3-30 Burrillville – Property taxation of electricity generating facilities located in the town. – Notwithstanding any other provisions of the general laws to the contrary, the town council of the town of Burrillville is authorized to determine, by ordinance or resolution, an amount of taxes to be paid each year on account of real or personal property used in connection with any facility for the generation of electricity located in the town, notwithstanding the valuation of the property or the rate of tax.

Council president John Pacheco told Katkevich that the item wasn’t properly on the agenda.

Burrillville resident Kenneth Putnam Jr. then rose and asked a follow up question, which provoked Wood’s response.

This exchange was provoked by a piece I wrote, in which I consulted with lawyers on background. To check my logic, I wrote Jerry Elmer, a Senior Attorney at the Conservation Law Foundation for his opinion. Elmer is an expert in climate change and renewable energy law and has literally written many of the laws currently on the books in Rhode Island regarding energy and climate.

Elmer’s response to my query is worth quoting in its entirety:

The Rhode Island state law on this matter is clear and unambiguous, even if not everyone is familiar with the law.  The Rhode Island statute I am referring to is R.I. General Laws § 44-3-30.  That statute gives the Town of Burrillville (which, legally, would act through the Town Council) the right to set the real estate taxes for any electricity generation plant within the Town (including, but not limited to Invenergy) at any level the Town wants.  Importantly, the level at which the Town taxes the energy plant (such as Invenergy) need not be sensible or reasonable.  For example, the Town could legally charge Invenergy $1 per decade in property taxes.  The Town could legally charge Invenergy $1 billion per week (or per day, or even per hour) in property taxes.  One could have a reasonable argument as to whether any of those tax levels I just mentioned are sensible, or whether (or not) they represent good public policy.  But under that statute (RIGL 44-3-30) they are legal.

“It is also important to note that the statute explicitly says that this is true notwithstanding any other state law to the contrary.  Thus, even if someone could point to a different state law on municipal property taxation, the provisions of RIGL 44-3-30 would trump that other (possible) law.  The statute also is true notwithstanding what tax rate the Town of Burrillville has on other properties (like local homes and businesses).  The statute is also true notwithstanding the actual valuation of the Invenergy power plant.

“The short of it is that there is a specific, very detailed, state law that speaks to this exact question, and which trumps other state laws.  By law, the Burrillville Town Council can set Invenergy’s property tax at any level it chooses; and, if the Town Council chooses, it has the legal authority to set that tax rate so high that Invenergy would pack its bags immediately and leave the Town forever.”

Earlier, Councillor David Place interrupted Katkevich, asking everyone present that even if the law as written and understood were true, “How long do you think it will be before that law is changed, if the Governor and the General Assembly want to pass the plant?”

Changing the law in the middle of negotiations to favor one party over another would be a pretty big move on the part of the Governor and the General Assembly, especially in the face of widening opposition to the plant and the rising unpopularity of our elected leaders. And the very idea of changing the law in that way is of dubious legality. But that’s a question for another day.

The “Town Council Special Meeting” was held in the Beckwith-Bruckshaw Memorial Lodge, a place with no microphones. From the beginning people in the back had difficulty hearing the proceedings. Only three Town Councillors, John Pacheco III, Stephen Rawson and David Place, attended. Town Planner Tom Kravitz gave a short presentation and answered many questions from those in attendance.

The general tenor of the meeting was one of distrust and exasperation. For instance, while the Town Council won’t reveal any details of tax deal negotiations with Invenergy, on Dan Yorke’s television show State of Mind, John Niland, Development Director for Invenergy and the company’s public face for the project floated the number $3.6 million a year in taxes and rising, over 20 years. This was more information than has ever been volunteered by the Burrillville Town Council.

The people of Burrillville have real concerns. Time and again Town Manager Wood says he “can’t discuss the particulars” of the pending deal with Invenergy, provoking those in attendance last night to reply that they “get all our information” from John Niland on Dan Yorke. In the video below, a resident points out that in her email exchange with Wood, the Town Manager didn’t seem to realize that her home was in the area determined to be affected by the power plant.

“How can we trust that you have our best interests at heart when clearly, I’m in a severely impacted area, and you’re saying I’m not?”

It gets worse.

Tiya Loiselle is a veteran whose home value has dropped nearly $50 thousand in value since January. She was hoping to build equity in her home, but instead she’s rapidly going underwater, because of the possibility of this plant coming to her town.

As much as the residents of Burrillville seem to distrust their Town Council, they distrust Governor Gina Raimondo more.

Governor Raimondo “has been on the wrong side of a lot of issues because she doesn’t listen to the people,” said one speaker.

“She doesn’t reply to your emails,” said another.

“Did she not say that she would meet” with us, asked a woman, who was answered by another woman with, “I followed up, and sent her a message asking ‘Are you still planning to come to Burrillville?’ and she said ‘You’ll have to talk to my advisory board.’”

“You can’t trust the Governor,” said the first woman, “You understand why you see Trump signs everywhere, because no one trusts the Governor any more.”

Perhaps no one at the meeting expressed the impotence, fear and anger felt by the people of Burrillville better than Deborah Krieg, a “mom from Burrillville”. Her short speech to the Town Council was heart breaking:

You can watch the entire Town Council meeting here:

Patreon

RI Coalition Against Gun Violence holds 2nd annual State House rally


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
2016-04-28 RICAGV 017
Jerry Belair

The RICAGV (Rhode Island Coalition Against Gun Violence) held their second annual rally outside the State House, reaffirming their support for three critical pieces of legislation that would ban guns on school grounds, take guns away from domestic abusers and limit magazine capacity to ten rounds. The General Assembly has shown little appetite for these bills in past years, though there are some signs that some sort of compromise bill on keeping guns out of the hands of domestic abusers might pass this year.

This rally comes after a punishing Senate Judiciary hearing Tuesday night that lasted until after midnight. (I’ll have a piece on that over the weekend.) Speaking about Tuesday night’s hearing, Jerry Belair, president of the RICAGV, said that though he doesn’t like to speak ill of any elected officials, Senators Stephen R. Archambault (Democrat District 22, Smithfield, North Providence, Johnston) and Frank S. Lombardi (Democrat – Distict 26, Cranston), “did more testifying than almost anybody else. They seemed to be unwilling to listen.”

Between the first three witnesses, all representing the gun lobby, and the Senators own “testimony” it took three hours before a single member of the public representing the other side of the argument could testify, said Belair. When his side finally got to speak, said Belair, the Senators did everything they could to interrupt and disagree, “doing everything they could to not make us as effective” in delivering our message.

Belair teased a poll that the RICAGV will be releasing soon that indicates that Rhode Islanders, 3 to 1, want a ten round magazine limit. The same poll says 4 to 1 Rhode Islanders don’t want guns in schools (contrary to Senator Lombardi’s fantasy scenario spelled out here), and 92 percent of Rhode Islanders don’t want domestic violence offenders to possess guns.

The bills to disarm domestic abusers are House Bill 7283 and Senate Bill 2730.

The bills to keep guns out of schools is House Bill 7243 and Senate Bill 2761.

The bills to ban high capacity magazines are House Bill 7199 and Senate Bill 2835.

The RICAGV is encouraging Rhode Islanders to contact their elected officials and demand their support.

Below is all the music and speakers from the rally, plus plenty of pictures.

2016-04-28 RICAGV 001

2016-04-28 RICAGV 003

2016-04-28 RICAGV 004

2016-04-28 RICAGV 005

2016-04-28 RICAGV 006

2016-04-28 RICAGV 007

2016-04-28 RICAGV 009

2016-04-28 RICAGV 011

2016-04-28 RICAGV 013

2016-04-28 RICAGV 014

2016-04-28 RICAGV 015

2016-04-28 RICAGV 016

2016-04-28 RICAGV 017

2016-04-28 RICAGV 018

2016-04-28 RICAGV 019

2016-04-28 RICAGV 021

2016-04-28 RICAGV 022

2016-04-28 RICAGV 023

2016-04-28 RICAGV 024

2016-04-28 RICAGV 025

2016-04-28 RICAGV 026

2016-04-28 RICAGV 027

2016-04-28 RICAGV 028

2016-04-28 RICAGV 029

2016-04-28 RICAGV 030

2016-04-28 RICAGV 031

2016-04-28 RICAGV 032

2016-04-28 RICAGV 033

2016-04-28 RICAGV 034

2016-04-28 RICAGV 035

2016-04-28 RICAGV 036

2016-04-28 RICAGV 037

2016-04-28 RICAGV 038

2016-04-28 RICAGV 039

2016-04-28 RICAGV 040

2016-04-28 RICAGV 041

2016-04-28 RICAGV 042

2016-04-28 RICAGV 043

2016-04-28 RICAGV 044

2016-04-28 RICAGV 045

Patreon

The health consequences of losing power


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

The health consequences of losing your gas or electric power are actually pretty obvious and pretty logical once you think for a minute about the many things Rhode Islanders use their electric power and gas to do.  Electricity runs our light after dark and, with gas powers our heat and heats our hot water, so if you lose power you lose light and heat and hot water.  Electricity powers air conditioners and refrigerators, so if you lose power you lose cooling in the summer and the ability to keep anything that needs to cooled – milk and butter and meet and fresh vegetables, but also insulin and many liquid antibiotics. In most of rural RI, in Exeter and Green and Wakefield and Foster and Scituate and Gloucester and West Greenwich and lots of other places, electricity runs the pumps that drive all our water, so when you lose electricity you lose running water all together.  And electricity drives many electric devices that help maintain the health and lives of the chronically ill – ventilators and oxygen concentrators, nebulizers, CPAP and BIPAP machines, home dialysis units and intravenous fluid pumps, hospital beds and all sorts of lights, meters and monitors.

There are over 10,000 Rhode Islanders enrolled in the Rhode Island Special Needs Registry and they are all at risk from losing power.  If you lose your power and you are on a ventilator, you’ll die in minutes or hours.  If you lose your power and use an Oxygen concentrator or CPAP or BIPAP, you’ll get sicker and could die or may need hospitalization in days or weeks. If you lose your power and you have asthma, you won’t be able to use your nebulizer and you could die or need hospitalization.  If you lose your light you lose the ability to see and follow directions so you can’t take prescribed medicine after dark, and if you lose your power and you are depressed or have a thought disorder, the darkness can become threatening and worsen the trouble you have with thinking and anxiety.  If you are elderly and are unstable on your feet, losing your light means you can’t even walk in your house at night.  If you have or are prone to any kind of infection, losing hot water means you can’t bath regularly and are at increased risk from skin, urinary and other sorts of infections, which can be life threatening in people with diabetes or with any disease that lowers your resistance to infection. If you live in a rural area and depend on well water, an electric cut-off means you can’t flush your toilet or wash your hands.  Try staying free from infection, or controlling any chronic disease under those conditions.

There is very strong medical evidence that many elderly and infirm will die in heat waves, so that lack of air conditioning in the summer is toxic to people who are elderly or who have serious lung or heart problems, and the lack of electricity puts people on a ventilator at immediate jeopardy and the lack of electricity puts those using oxygen and those Rhode Islanders using CPAP and BIPAP at significant risk.

Interestingly, we don’t know as much about health risks of extended exposures to cold temperatures, expect to know that the elderly and infirm are at significant additional risk from extremes of temperature.  I thought about that for a long time, because it doesn’t make intuitive sense – we all know that being out in the cold lowers your resistance and you can get a cold and then catch your death of pneumonia, right?  And we know the one year mortality for the street sleeping homeless is about 30 percent, higher than end stage heart failure and many types of aggressive cancer – that about a third of people who sleep on the street die every year, and the street sleeping homeless experience cold temperatures though they are beset by many other kinds of health risks as well. So what gives about the lack of medical evidence and public health data about cold?  Then I realized that no civilized country lets people sit in cold houses any more.  So when there isn’t widespread cold exposure, we can’t study it.  Maybe there is no evidence about cold because when people are cold they can put on lots of layers of clothing and that protects them.  Or maybe, just maybe, the number of people exposed is small enough, thank god, that we haven’t been able to study the problem with scientific precision.

And that also means that the moratorium on utility cutoffs in the winter – that the law says people’s utilities can’t be cut off from November 15 to April 15 if they have a doctor’s letter, actually makes no sense.  Elderly Rhode Islanders and Rhode Islanders with medical problems are  at increased risk in the summer.  So to me that means we need a moratorium on all utility cutoffs for people who are elderly or have medical problems, seven days a week, 365 days a year.

One more thing.  Every time someone with a medical problem gets their power turned off, they are way more likely to end up in the hospital.  The hospitalization is going to cost 10 to 50 thousand dollars or more.  You know who pays for that hospitalization?  Most of those folks have Medicare or Medicaid.  So National Grid doesn’t pay for that hospitalization.  You and I pay for it.  It comes out of tax dollars.  National Grid, a regulated monopoly in Rhode Island protects their bottom line, but you and I pay. And the money we spend?  That’s money that we could and should be spending on education, safe and healthy housing, the environment and recreational opportunities for kids and young adults in our communities .  So who really wins and who really loses, when National Grid cuts people off and the State of Rhode Island’s Division of Public Utilities lets them do that?

Like I said, the medical and health consequences of utility cut-offs are pretty obvious.  If people who are ill don’t have electric power, hot water, light, heat and air-conditioning, they are going to get sicker.  Some may die.  And cutting off utilities to people who are ill is illegal in Rhode Island.  But National Grid does that anyway, and the Division of Public Utilities lets them.  Outraged, like I am?  Then do one or more of these 5 things:

  1. If you are interested in getting involved –come to the monthly LIFELINE PROJECT meetings– the FIRST Wednesday of every month at 6 pm at the George Wiley Center (32 East Ave) in Pawtucket. Next meeting is MAY 4th at 6 pm.
  2. If you work at an agency that assist consumers – contact us so that we can set up a training for your staffabout the protections available under the law for medically vulnerable consumers. Contact Keally Cieslik or Camilo Viveiros
  3. If you are angry and outraged -write to the Division of Public Utilities and tell them so!  You can also write to the AG’s office in the State and/or your elected officials. Addresses are available here today on our fliers! (fliers available in the lobby).  Call the Governor’s office and the Speaker’s office and the Senate President’s Office.  When the CEO of National Grid calls the Governor or Speaker or Senate President, they take his call.  Don’t you think they should take your call as well? You vote. National Grid has to buy their influence.
  4. DONATE –the George Wiley Center and the Center for Justice need resources to continue doing this work. You can make a donation today by cash or check.

This is still a democracy. Let’s all speak up together  and make National Grid respect the law.

 

Burrillville Town Council secretly negotiating tax deals with Invenergy


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Oleg Nikolyszyn
Oleg Nikolyszyn

In a stunning revelation, Burrillville Town Council legal counsel Oleg Nikolyszyn confirmed under questioning from Burrillville resident Jeremy Bailey that the council has been secretly negotiating a tax agreement with Invenergy for the proposed gas and oil burning power plant. Before this revelation, the existence of such negotiations may have been suspected, but were not confirmed. Shortly after Nikolyszyn’s revelation, Councillor Kimberly Brissette Brown questioned whether the item was properly before the Council. Council President John Pacheco III said that the item was not properly before the council, and said that if Bailey wanted to discuss the issue of the Council’s tax agreement deliberations with Invenergy, he would have to put that item on the agenda.

How Bailey would know to put previously unknown secret meetings with Invenergy on the agenda was not discussed.

Nikolyszyn’s admission capped a stressful and difficult Burrillville Town Council meeting, in which council members, aided by legal counsel Nikolyszyn, once again said that they have no power to stand against Invenergy. President Pacheco said that if the Town Council doesn’t remain absolutely neutral about the plant, it may seem that they are unfairly influencing various boards, the members of which the Town Council has nominated. Why this level of neutrality is necessary from the Burrillville Town Council in relation to boards they nominate but such neutrality is not necessary for Governor Gina Raimondo, who nominates the members of the Energy Facilities Siting Board and has taken a position in strong support of the power plant, is unknown.

Burrillville resident Jonathan Dyson later followed up with the Town Council about the tax negotiations with Invenergy, asking if there was any board, regulation or law that forced the tax agreement meetings. Despite saying earlier that the item wasn’t properly before the board, Pacheco answered Dyson and maintained that entering into such discussions was a fiduciary duty of the Town Council. Then Pachco added that these negotiations also include the “potential abutters to the power plant,” that is, people who own property next to Invenergy’s land.

Pacheco didn’t explain exactly what this means, but it seems to indicate that Invenergy is actively negotiating what payments, if any, abutters to the project might receive in the event that the power plant is built.

When Dyson then asked the Town Council “under what conditions would the Town Council say no to Invenergy,” Town manager Michael Wood angrily said, “That is not an agenda item.” But in fact, it was an agenda item 16-106  (b). Wood then said that the item was too vague and would not be discussed, never mind that earlier, Council President Pacheco had complimented Gary Patterson, who requested that item be placed on the the agenda, saying, “Your item on the agenda was properly phrased. I appreciate that.”

Throughout the meeting the Town Council took great pains to tell the people attending that the fix wasn’t in and this wasn’t a done deal. However, to the consternation of most of those present, the Town Council has admitted to secretly negotiating tax agreements and issues of abutment with Invenergy. Worse, theses discussion have been going on for some time, as the earliest discussions seem to precede Oleg Nikolyszyn becoming town solicitor.

By the end of the meeting the public was more angry and distrustful of the Town Council than when the meeting began.

I’ll be writing much more about this meeting in a future piece, but right now, questions remain: How long has the Town Council been in negotiation with Invenergy? Who has been party to these negotiations? The Town Council says that this isn’t a done deal, that the “fix isn’t in” but what other unknown meetings and negotiations are happening without the public’s knowledge?

Burrillville Town Council

Patreon

Nursing home workers Fight for $15


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

2016-04-13 SEIU 001Following a wave of successful efforts to raise the minimum wage in California and New York, and with news that nursing home workers in Pennsylvania won a $15 starting wage, SEIU 1199 held a “Fight for $15” rally at the State House Wednesday afternoon.

“I shouldn’t have to rely on food stamps if I’m working 40 hours a week taking care of people. But I do! Honestly, I could be making more at Dunkin’ Donts and that’s ridiculous,” said Nichole Ward, a CNA at Greenville Skilled Nursing and Rehab in a statement.

Of special interest was legislation submitted by Rep Scott Slater (H7547) and Senator Gayle Goldin (S2521) that directs funds in the nursing home budget to raise wages for nursing home workers. Similar legislation was passed in Massachusetts last year. Both Goldin and Slater promised to fight for this legislation, with Slater calling it his top priority.

Shirley Lomba, a CNA/CMT for 14 years warned that talented nurses will soon be leaving our state for the better paying jobs in Massachusetts, saying, “many of us will drive 15-20 minutes… where we can earn more money.”

2016-04-13 SEIU 011

2016-04-13 SEIU 002

2016-04-13 SEIU 003

2016-04-13 SEIU 004

2016-04-13 SEIU 005

2016-04-13 SEIU 006

2016-04-13 SEIU 007

2016-04-13 SEIU 008

2016-04-13 SEIU 009

2016-04-13 SEIU 010

Patreon

Home health care workers rally for higher wages at State House


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

2016-04-12 Home Health Care 011The Rhode Island Partnership for Home Care has been feeling the squeeze as Medicaid rates have not been increased since 2008. Under legislation introduced in the House by Representative Shekarchi and the Senate by Senator Doyle those rates could be increased by 40 percent, bringing RI into parity with Massachusetts and Connecticut. Proponents estimate the cost of this increase will be about $9 million, and will fetch equivalent funds from the Federal government.

Those at the rally were not happy with Governor Raimondo’s 7 percent “wage-pass through” which is too little for workers and not something Nicholas Oliver,  executive director of the Partnership, thinks the companies can provide. Many of the companies are struggling to survive, and the small wage increase Raimondo is suggesting may be swallowed up by the companies and “never reach the home health care workers as intended.”

Lee Ann Quinn, a nurse and home health care provider has a 17 year old son named Zachary who is wheelchair bound due to a progressive neuro-muscular disease. “It’s a really sad day,” said Quinn, “when one of my son’s home health care aids comes to my home and tells me ‘you know they’re paying $10.25 at McDonald’s and they don’t have to do any of the things I do…'”

2016-04-12 Home Health Care 002

2016-04-12 Home Health Care 001

2016-04-12 Home Health Care 003

2016-04-12 Home Health Care 004

2016-04-12 Home Health Care 005

2016-04-12 Home Health Care 006

2016-04-12 Home Health Care 007

2016-04-12 Home Health Care 008

2016-04-12 Home Health Care 009

2016-04-12 Home Health Care 010

2016-04-12 Home Health Care 012

2016-04-12 Home Health Care 013

2016-04-12 Home Health Care 014

2016-04-12 Home Health Care 015

Patreon

Is Raimondo’s power plant support softening?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

2015-11-30 World AIDS Day 007 Gina RaimondoIn light of the letter to the Energy Facility Siting Board (EFSB) from Representative Cale Keable and State Senator Paul Fogarty expressing “unequivocal opposition” to the new “1000-megawatt, fracked gas power plant in the heart of Burrillville’s idyllic village of Pascoag” I reached out to the Invenergy‘s earliest booster, Governor Gina Raimondo for comment. Raimondo spokesperson Marie Aberger responded (italics mine):

The Governor and her team are closely monitoring the plans and listening to community feedback and concerns. We will be learning more about the health and environmental impacts of the plans as the Energy Facility Siting Board continues its review of the proposal, and reviewing those impacts carefully.

“At the same time, the Governor believes we need to take action to address our energy costs in the present for all Rhode Island families and businesses.  A large part of the Governor’s strategy is to adopt new solutions that will lead us to a cleaner, more reliable energy system in the future, including offshore wind and solar power.”

It’s difficult to tell if this statement shows a softening of the Governor’s position on the plant, which she called, “something that’s good for Rhode Island” when she announced the project in July of last year. Since she announced the plant Raimondo has been petitioned by environmental activists to change her position and has been confronted by sign carrying protesters at many public events.

But recently opposition to the plant has been building Burrillville, where residents are facing potential economic and environmental disaster due to the plant. Hundreds showed up at a community meeting with Keable and Fogarty at the Jesse Smith Memorial Library in Burrillville and hundreds more came out to the EFSB public hearing at the Burrillville High School. The political pressure is intensifying and many residents feel that Raimondo talk about being an environmental champion rings hollow given her support.

It was perhaps because he wanted to protect his status as an environmental champion that Senator Sheldon Whitehouse went from supporting the plant in an interview with Channel 12’s Ted Nesi to claiming that he can’t oppose or support the plant for political reasons in an interview with Bill Rappleye of Channel 10.

It turns out you can’t support the environment and fracked methane.

Still, Raimondo’s statement said that she’s “listening to community feedback and concerns” so that seems to mean that she needs to hear from people opposed to this plant and who want to see Rhode Island embrace a clean energy future. Given that, here’s the governor’s address, phone number and a link to the Governor’s contact page:

Office of the Governor
82 Smith Street
Providence, RI 02903

Phone: (401) 222-2080

http://www.governor.ri.gov/contact/

Patreon

Public comment on Burrillville power plant: Video


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Here’s the full video from the Energy Facility Siting Board (EFSB) public comment hearing held in the Burrillville High School auditorium last night. You can read the report and see pictures from the hearing here:

Further reading:

2016-03-31-Burrillville-EFSB-001-300x285

Patreon

Labor, citizens clash over power plant in Burrillville


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

2016-03-31 Burrillville EFSB 001For full video of all public commentary, see here.

It has been a long wait, but the people of Burrillville finally got their chance to speak out on the Clear River Energy Center (CREC), Invenergy’s proposed $700 million gas and oil burning electrical plant last night. The Energy Facility Siting Board (EFSB) held the first public comment hearing in the Burrillville High School auditorium, which holds 600 people. More than 100 people were outside, unable to get in. Hundreds of people signed up to speak, only 48 people got to do so.

The EFSB board is made up of Margaret Curran, chair of the RI Public Utilities Commission and Janet Coit, director of the Department of Environmental Management. The third seat on the board has recently been filled, since Parag Agrawal has been hired as the associate director of the Rhode Island Division of Planning. He begins his new job on April 18, so should be at the next EFSB hearing.

2016-03-31 Burrillville EFSB 002Tensions were high in the auditorium. Michael Sabitoni, president of the Rhode Island Building and Construction Trades Council and over a hundred union members arrived early, and many Burrillville natives resented their presence. One speaker from Burrillville claimed that the union members were “intimidating.” A union speaker objected to this, calling the accusation of intimidation, “B.S.”

As near as I can tell, the eight speakers in favor of the power plant were all union members. They made their case based on the 300 construction and 24 permanent jobs that would be created. Sabitoni said that he’s run into meetings like this before, where a community shows up to complain about a large project to be built in their town. He dismissed the concerns of Burrillville citizens as NIMBYism.

Donna Woods was the first speaker, and she was set the tone for the evening. She said that there is a fear that the decision to approve the power plant has already been made, despite Curran and Coit’s insistence to the contrary. During Wood’s testimony, Curran broke protocol and addressed Wood directly, insisting that no decision has been made.

“Many of us feel that we’ve been screaming underwater,” said Woods, “This is real life stuff and we’re really afraid.”

2016-03-31 Burrillville EFSB 021
Janet Coit and Margaret Curran

Residents of Burrillville and the surrounding communities are worried about the noise, air pollution, water pollution, the destruction of a pristine environment to make room for the power plant and their property values, which are already dropping. But many speakers spoke of the environmental dangers of fracking, about helping to prevent global warming and sea level rise, and about our greater duty to future generations.

Burrillville has experienced environmental disaster first hand. Well water was contaminated years ago with MBTE from a leaking gas station gas tank. MBTE causes cancer, and many in the auditorium last night have friends and relatives who suffered and died. Between the gas pipeline compressor stations, the Ocean State Power Plant and the MBTE disaster, many residents feel, in the words of one speaker, that, “Burrillville has given enough.”

Invenergy began the public comment hearing with a presentation. I wrote about this 30-60 minute long presentation and questioned the need for it here. Curran introduced the presentation saying it would last 20 minutes, but in fact it lasted longer, much closer to the originally estimated 30 minutes. After cutting the presentation short for time, Curran said that the full report was on the EFSB website, which is a point I made in my piece. An additional six members of the public could have spoken had Invenergy not been needlessly granted that time.

The frustration that the citizens of Burrillville feel about the proposed Invenergy power plant and the EFSB process is only expected to magnify over the next weeks and months. Frustration with their elected leaders in the Town Council, General Assembly and state wide offices is widespread and no one should be surprised if Burrillville seeks change in the upcoming elections.

The next public comment meeting is scheduled for 6pm, Monday, May 23.

2016-03-31 Burrillville EFSB 022

2016-03-31 Burrillville EFSB 003

2016-03-31 Burrillville EFSB 004

2016-03-31 Burrillville EFSB 005

2016-03-31 Burrillville EFSB 006

2016-03-31 Burrillville EFSB 007

2016-03-31 Burrillville EFSB 008

2016-03-31 Burrillville EFSB 009

2016-03-31 Burrillville EFSB 010

2016-03-31 Burrillville EFSB 011

2016-03-31 Burrillville EFSB 012

2016-03-31 Burrillville EFSB 013

2016-03-31 Burrillville EFSB 014

2016-03-31 Burrillville EFSB 015

2016-03-31 Burrillville EFSB 016

2016-03-31 Burrillville EFSB 017

2016-03-31 Burrillville EFSB 018

2016-03-31 Burrillville EFSB 019

2016-03-31 Burrillville EFSB 020

2016-03-31 Burrillville EFSB 024

2016-03-31 Burrillville EFSB 025

2016-03-31 Burrillville EFSB 026

2016-03-31 Burrillville EFSB 027

2016-03-31 Burrillville EFSB 029

2016-03-31 Burrillville EFSB 030

2016-03-31 Burrillville EFSB 031

Patreon

Burrillville state reps in the hot seat over Invenergy power plant


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Burrillville Libray 002
photo (c) Pia Ward

Sixty people quickly filled the small meeting room, and when the librarian stopped letting in, between two and three times that number were forced to idle in in the parking lot, listen in through the window screens, or leave in frustration.

Kathy Martley of BASE (Burrillville Against Spectra Expansion) had invited Representative Cale Keable and State Senator Paul Fogarty to meet with their constituents at the Jesse M. Smith Memorial Library in Harrisville to discuss what can be done about Invenergy’s Clear River Energy Center, a new gas and oil burning energy plant currently planned for the Town of Burrillville. The turnout exceeded everyone’s expectations.

Brian Newberry, Cale Keable, Paul Fogarty
Brian Newberry, Cale Keable, Paul Fogarty

Senator Fogarty set the tone early on, saying that there’s “not a lot the General Assembly can do about [the power plant].” Claiming that he hasn’t yet made up his mind, Fogarty said, “I’m not here to stop the power plant, but I’m not here to put  a shovel in the ground [either].”

Rep Keable agreed, saying that the General Assembly has no control over the EFSB (Energy Facilities Siting Board), the political body tasked with determining the fate of the planned power plant, while acknowledging that “There’a a lot of anger out there.”

In many ways I was reminded of the first Burrillville Town Council meeting I attended back in October, when council members claimed to be powerless against the power plant.

The Town Council recommended contacting Governor Gina Raimondo or State Representative Cale Keable. Now here was Rep Keable and Senator Fogarty, telling residents that, “It comes down to a local issue.” Keable and Fogarty recommend taking it up with the Town Council.

A man stands and tells his state representatives that this isn’t good enough. “The answer is ’no.’ We don’t want the power plant,” he says, “We want you,” said the man, pointing to Keable and Fogarty, “to help us do this. We want you to talk to the Town Council. When there are meetings we want you to be our advocate there…

“There’s going to be a block of people, believe me, standing against this power plant. It’s going to be a movement.”

DSC_4849Burrillville has a history with large corporate projects like this ruining their town. Some well water in town is poisoned with MBTE from an Exxon gas station leak. One woman stood and said that three members of her family contracted cancer during that time. Her property abutted the land used to build the Ocean State Power Plant. She sold her home and moved, only to find that Invenergy wants to build its power plant in her front yard. She wonders about the toxins the plants pollution will rain on her property and into her air and water. “Our property values are already going down. What help are we going to have?

“Am I going to have to wait until my grand kids come down with cancer? Or my busband or my children still living at home? Because that’s what happened to my niece, her husband and her daughter.”

The new power plant will have little to no effect on Burrillville’s electric rates. There are few positives on offer: Some jobs, some tax relief, and a plan to clean the water contaminated with MBTE. The negatives are declining property values, pollution in both air and water, and a degradation of Burrillville’s pristine natural environment.

On Thursday night the people of Burrillville will have their first chance to bring their concerns to the EFSB. If tonight’s informal meeting is any indication, that meeting ought to be very interesting.

Full video of the meeting can be viewed here:

Burrillville Libray 001
Paul Fogarty, Kathy Martley, Cale Keable (photo (c) Pia Ward)

Patreon

FANG to offer nonviolent direct action training in Providence


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

FANG (Fighting Against Natural Gas) will be holding Nonviolent Direct Action Trainings in Providence next week at the First Unitarian Church of Providence. The organizers write:

2015-12-05 FANG Arrests Spectra 005This Spring, FANG will continue to nonviolently escalate our efforts to stop Invenergy‘s fracked-gas power plant that’s proposed for Burrillville, stop Spectra‘s continued pipeline expansion schemes and confront other forms of injustice.

“In December 100 people marched in Burrillville and eight people were arrested as part of a nonviolent direct action. Now it’s time to go bigger and stop these fracked-gas projects once and for all. Plug into the resistance and into future actions by attending one this nonviolent direct action workshop!

“We’ll cover the history of nonviolent direct action, different types of action tactics, how to carry out an action and much more. These trainings are meant to immediately help people plug into actions that will happen this Spring.”

Four trainings are planned in all, two in Providence and two in Worcester:

  • Tuesday, April 5th from 6-9pm at the First Unitarian Church of Providence (1 Benevolent St)
  • Thursday, April 7th from 6-9pm at the First Unitarian Church of Providence (1 Benevolent St)
  • Monday, April 11th from 6-9pm at Stone Soup in Worcester (4 King Street)
  • Thursday, April 14th from 6-9pm at Stone Soup in Worcester (4 King Street)

You can register for the trainings here.

10426651_467048933493097_5904300166866419451_n

 

Power plant already adversely affecting Burrillville property values say realtors


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

2016-03-22 Burrillville 003During public commentary at the Burrillville Town Council meeting Wednesday night, two real estate agents talked about the negative effect the proposed gas and oil burning Clear River Energy Center is already having on property values in the town.

Jeremy Bailey, from Acumen Group Real Estate, testified that he recently had a prospective buyer from Riverside about to put half down on a $449,000 piece of property on East Wallum Lake Road.

“He liked everything about the property,” said Bailey, “But before the conversation ended he asked, ‘Where are they putting the power plant?’”

Bailey pointed up the road and explained that the proposed construction wasn’t too far away. By the time he finished the buyer backed out, saying, “Nah, I’m not interested anymore.”

2016-03-22 Burrillville 002
Outside the Burrillvile Town Hall

After the meeting Bailey told me that the buyer told him to let him know how the March 31 public hearing on the power plant goes.

Paul Lefebvre, another realtor and owner of Acumen Group, testified that when he heard about the proposed plant two years ago, he didn’t think much about it. He couldn’t see any way that the Town Council might support such a plan. But recently he learned that the power plant  has the support of both Senator Sheldon Whitehouse and Governor Gina Raimondo, and it now appears the power plant is being “forced on the town.”

“Which is insanity,” said Lefebvre, “I don’t see any benefits for the town. I see all detriments. Nothing good, only bad.”

Speaking about the effect the proposed power plant is having on property values, Lefebvre said, “We’ve lost some interest and lost one sale at the company I own because of the talk, the perception, of this thing coming to town.”

“What surprises me,” said Burrillville native and retired schoolteacher Chuck Boucher, “is that the political system seems to have cut us out of the process. I was under the impression that we were a democracy… I would like to think that when Governor Raimondo hears the situation out here that she realizes that it will adversely affect everyone’s property values. It will adversely affect everyone’s health. It will adversely affect the community at large. I would like to believe that she cares enough about her constituents to reconsider locating something of this size in a rural area that’s known for being pristine.”

Kathy Martley
Kathy Martley

Kathy Martley, founder of Burrillville Against Spectra Expansion (BASE), asked the Burrillville Town Council to consider a resolution similar to the one Providence City Councillor Seth Yurdin submitted to the Providence City Council last week that was adopted unanimously. Yurdin was concerned about the health, environmental and safety effects of the proposed Fields Point Liquefaction facility to be located in South Providence.

“As a Burrillville resident and tax payer, I urge you to pass the same resolution to stop this project,” said Martley, until health, environmental and safety studies are done.

Jeremy Bailey pointed out that the power plant wants to tap into the town well and the sewer system. “At a minimum,” said Bailey, the Town Council could speak to state and federal agencies and ask them to, “hold off on entertaining or approving” the power plant.

In the past the Burrillville Town Council has claimed to be powerless against the corporate might of  multi-billion dollar fossil fuel companies like Invenergy and Spectra, but as Martley, Bailey and other residents speaking before the Town Council last night pointed out, there is plenty that can be done on a local level.

Video of all who testified on the proposed power plant here:

Patreon

Common sense gun legislation once again before House Judiciary


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Rally Against Gun Violence 020The State House will be a raucous, contentious place this evening as a series of bills dealing with guns will be heard in the House Judiciary meeting in room 101 at the rise of the House, around 4:30-5pm. Testimony is expected to run until late in the evening. Ahead of the testimony the 2nd Amendment Coalition, the Official National Rifle Association (NRA) Affiliate for the State of Rhode Island, is holding a rally at 3pm in the State House rotunda and they will have a parade of guest speakers.

The Rhode Island Coalition Against Gun Violence (RICAGV) is backing three bills.

H7283 would take away guns from those convicted of domestic violence misdemeanors.

“Rhode Island law prohibits gun ownership and possession by individuals convicted of a domestic violence felony,” says the RICAGV, “This law is weaker than federal law which prohibits gun ownership and possession by those convicted of domestic violence misdemeanors. There is ample evidence that misdemeanor domestic violence offenders present an extreme risk to domestic partners when in possession of a firearm. Rhode Island should help protect the victims of domestic violence, not their abusers.”

H7243  would close a loophole that allows guns in schools and on school grounds.

Concealed Carry Permit (CCP) holders can carry their weapons ‘everywhere’ including schools, but not in RI courthouses, airports and most government buildings,” says the RICAGV, “RI’s concealed carry law came into existence in 1990, long before Columbine and other school shootings, so schools were not exempted at that time. Currently, any CCP holder (staff, parent, visitor) can carry a firearm on school grounds including the school, surrounding property, parking lots, and after school sporting events and gatherings without knowledge of police or school officials.”

H7199, a high capacity magazine (HCM) ban, limits the number of rounds in a weapon to 10.

“Limiting HCMs to 10 rounds saves lives,” says the RICAGV, “Limiting rounds in a magazine requires that a shooter pause to change out the magazine. The shooter in Sandy Hook Elementary School killed 20 small children in less than 5 minutes with HCMs. Evidence reveals that several children escaped the schoolroom when his magazine jammed and he was forced to reload. Similarly, the shooter in the Gabby Gifford Tucson, AZ mass shooting was disarmed when he dropped his HCM clip during reloading. This enabled bystanders to subdue him saving lives.”

Patreon

Community speaks out to defend Memorial Hospital Birthing Center from closing


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Ana Novais, Nicole Alexander-Scott, Kenny Alston
Ana Novais, Nicole Alexander-Scott, Kenny Alston

At the third and probably last community meeting being held by the Rhode Island Department of Health (RIDOH) to discuss the potential closing of the Memorial Hospital Birthing Center, well over a hundred people turned out to speak. Since the massive protest outside Care New England’s offices last week the movement to keep the birthing center seems to have grown. One speaker at this community meeting drove over an hour to speak her piece about the closing, because the birth of her child at Memorial four years ago was such a positive experience and so important to her.

Care New England announced the closing on March 2, RIDOH Director Dr. Nicole Alexander-Scott scheduled three hearings because under the law, RIDOH must approve any such closing. The process is called a Reverse Certificate of Need and there are procedures connected to the process that Care New England seems to have skipped when announcing the closing of the birthing center. The process is “intended to ensure access to quality health services and healthcare throughout Rhode Island.” Dr. Alexander-Scott has ruled that she must approve or deny the facility’s proposal within 90 days.

Chris Callaci, an attorney representing the nurses who will lose their jobs if the facility closes, pointed out that Care New England has not actually filed a plan for closing the birthing center, as required by law. The public, he says, is being forced to comment on a plan without any of the details of the plan. Further, he says that scheduling the hearings with barely a week’s notice may be a violation of the law. Calico claims that the first meetings must be scheduled no earlier than thirty days after Care New England has submitted a complete plan.

Because of the vagaries of RI public hearing law, the officials in attendance do not comment or answer questions from the public. So Dr. Alexander-Scott, Executive Director Ana Novais and Chief Legal Council Kenny Alston sat silently as patients, medical professionals and community members spoke out against the birthing center’s closure.

Many who live in Pawtucket and surrounding areas object to having their inpatient obstetrics services moved at the 11th hour to Women & Infants or Kent County Memorial Hospital. To interrupt pregnancy care for women who plan to deliver in April and May is a terrible physical and emotional inconvenience for mothers and families, never mind the increased travel time and the last minute loss of a doula.

One woman who is due in early May said that the only information she has received on the closing of the Memorial Hospital Birthing Center has been from those advocating against the closing. Official communication from Care New England has been scant.

Central Falls Mayor James Diossa said he is very concerned about the interruption of services at the birthing center. But he stopped short of calling on Care New England to change their plan. He simply wishes to be involved as a community partner to make the transition as safe as possible for the residents of Central Falls and Pawtucket. This is similar to the position staked out by Governor Gina Raimondo, who has announced no plan to intervene in the closing but who says she understands the pain being caused “as a mother.”

A doula testified that despite Care New England’s promise that all providers would be credentialed at Women & Infants or Kent, there is no process in place for her to be credentialed. In fact, Women & Infants requires an OB/GYN be present during the process. Since Memorial functions as a community service provider, there is no way most people who use Memorial Birthing Center can afford to have two providers present during the birth of their child.

This has the effect of medicalizing birth, something many women who wish to deliver their children object to.

“If Memorial closes,” said a mother planning to deliver in June, “my choices will be to have a home birth, which I do not want, or go to Cambridge. There is no other place offering the options I want.”

Memorial Birthing Center Public Comment

Patreon

PVD City Council passes Yurdin’s Fields Point expansion review resolution unanimously


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Seth Yurdin
Seth Yurdin

The Providence City Council voted unanimously to approve Councillor Seth Yurdin’s resolution to “require a thorough review of” the “proposed Fields Point Liquefaction Facility… and a Comprehensive Public Participation Plan.”

“This is a very important neighborhood issue,” said Yurdin to the City Council ahead of the resolution’s passage, “it’s a social justice issue, its about treating all our residents fairly. There are significant health issues that have been raised [and] safety concerns, related to locating this facility in proximity to a residential neighborhood.”

The process of approving National Grid’s proposed liquefaction facility at Fields Point is in the hands of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), but as Yurdin noted in his comments before the City Council last night, there has not been much room made for public input into the plan. Part of Yurdin’s resolution calls for “public forums in multiple neighborhood locations” and “shall require representatives of the project site owner [National Grid, presumably] to attend to answer questions and address concerns, as well as require that representatives from Rhode Island Department of Health, Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management, and the Rhode Island Coastal Resources Management Corporation participate in the public forums.”

The resolution also calls for:

  • An “environmental impact analysis include potential disaster scenarios, evacuation plans, and casualties within a two-mile radius of the project site, as well as evaluates the concentration of other facilities in the area that may impact public health and safety in the case of a disaster.”
  • That the review “include studies of diesel truck traffic between I-95 and the port area on a daily, monthly, and annual basis, and the estimated particulate matter released into the air as a result of such traffic.”
  • That the “City Council support the Rhode Island Department of Health request that a Risk Management Plan be required.”
  • That the “City of Providence will ensure compliance with the highest standards of environmental and health protocols, and will address, to the extent allowed by law, environmental, safety, and health concerns associated with this project.”

Watching the resolution pass were several members of the Environmental Justice League of Rhode Island, who were quite pleased with the City Council’s resolution.

EJLeague

Though this resolution by itself will not resolve the issues surrounding the LNG expansion at Fields Point, it will bring much needed attention and public input to the project, allowing a robust discussion of the future of fossil fuels in Rhode Island at a time when the fate of our species is being decided by what we do next.

Read the Environmental Justice League of Rhode Island white paper on National Grid’s plan here:

●  Flawed Proposal: Background info on National Grid’s unnecessary project

●  Potential Disasters: dangerous facility in a high risk area

●  Environmental Racism: ongoing and underlying environmental justice issues

●  Climate Change: it causes climate change and is at risk from climate impacts

●  Public Health: health disparities and impacts on health care institutions

●  Economic Inequality: high cost project that will cause economic damage

●  Alternatives and Solutions: Strategies for Climate Justice & a Just Transition

Patreon


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387