Smiley, Goldin and Cimini submit “Guns and Ammo” tax bill


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Goldin SmileyBrett Smiley, running for the position of Mayor of Providence in this September’s Democratic primary isn’t letting the fact that he hasn’t been elected stop him from coming forward with some bold new initiatives.

Tuesday morning found Smiley in the State House rotunda with State Senator Gayle Goldin proposing a bill that upon passage would impose a 10% tax on all gun and ammunition sales in the state. Representative Maria Cimini, who was unable to attend the press conference, will introduce the bill in the house.

The bill promises to allocate all funds raised from this tax (estimated by Smiley to be about $2 million) to every town and city police department based proportionally on the prevalence of crime in each area, and then each police department will further allocate the money to non-profits with a demonstrated commitment to reducing crime and violence.

Said Smiley, “Just like we expect the tobacco industry and those who support it to pay for public health initiatives, the firearms industry and those who prop it up should be paying to keep our streets safe.”

Senator Goldin pointed out that, “This is a different approach,” adding, “I will certainly be working hard to get this passed.”

Currently, no state has imposed a special tax on guns or ammunition, and only Cook County, Illinois has imposed a special tax on guns. In that sense this legislation marks a new kind of thinking when dealing with gun violence on a state level.

“The damage done by guns legally and illegal [obtained] imposes a cost on society and this [bill] is one way to pay that cost,” said Smiley, “Gun violence has been a plague on our community for many years, and solutions to address this issue deserve long term commitments from all of us who seek to serve the community.”

Breaking News: NRA settles with Board of Elections for $63,000


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

The Board of Elections has settled with the NRA for the sum of $63,000.  In September, I filed a campaign finance complaint against the NRA on behalf of the Rhode Island Progressive Democrats, alleging that the NRA’s Rhode Island PAC was illegally funded by the national NRA PAC.  In the consent order laying out the terms of the settlement, the Board of Elections has confirmed that the NRA did indeed illegally fund its Rhode Island PAC from the federal PAC, revealing that that actually shared the same bank account.

“Heading into what may turn out to be the most expensive year in modern Rhode Island elections, Common Cause is please to see that the Board of Elections is vigorously enforcing the state’s campaign finance laws,” said John Marion, executive director of Common Cause Rhode Island.  “The NRA, with its vast resources, should have had no problem properly segregating their funds.  This consent decree, with its significant financial penalty and additional stipulations, sends a clear signal that if you’re going to participate in our political process you need to obey the rules.  When it comes to the 2nd Amendment the NRA preaches the need to enforce existing laws.  We’re glad to see that the Board of Elections decided to take their advice when it came to campaign finance laws.”

Since 2002, the NRA RI PAC has contributed $163,495 to Rhode Island candidates, mostly conservative Democrats like House Speaker Gordon Fox, Senate President Teresa Paiva-Weed, Senate Majority Leader Dominic Ruggerio, and House Majority Leader Nick Mattiello.  Mike McCaffrey, the conservative Democrat from Warwick who chairs the Senate Judiciary committee, which has jurisdiction over most gun legislation, has also received thousands of dollars from the controversial gun lobby.  So did former Speaker Bill Murphy, the Democrat who is currently the chief lobbyist for the gun interests in Rhode Island.

Shortly after I filed the campaign finance complaint, the NRA closed down its Rhode Island PAC.  In the settlement, the NRA agrees to follow campaign finance law should it reopen its PAC.

 

Exeter could still lose on the gun issue that sparked failed recall


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Exeter-Four-300x192On Saturday, the people of Exeter spoke decisively. Rejecting the gun lobby’s attempt to overturn the results of the 2012 election, they overwhelmingly voted against the recall of the four Democrats on the five-member town council. But will this matter for the issue this whole election was fought over—fixing the small town’s “shall issue” concealed carry permitting loophole? Sadly, the answer is probably no. Why? Because the NRA still controls the General Assembly.

Many Rhode Islanders are shocked to learn that House Speaker Gordon Fox, House Majority Leader Nick Mattiello, Senate President Teresa Paiva-Weed, and Senate Majority Leader Dominick Ruggerio—all Democrats—have each taken thousands of dollars from the NRA. And I believe those contributions are illegal. (The NRA’s Rhode Island PAC shut down in response to a complaint I filed alleging major violations.) As if that were not enough, the chief lobbyist for the gun people is former House Speaker Bill Murphy, who is nominally a Democrat. All this in a state that favors an assault weapons ban by a 37-point margin.

Even though reform advocates probably have the votes for an assault weapons ban on the Senate Judiciary Committee, conservative chairman Mike McCaffrey (who has also received thousands of dollars from the NRA) refuses to call a vote. Although the House Judiciary Committee is chaired by true Democrat Edie Ajello, who has never taken a dime from the NRA, Speaker Gordon Fox refuses to let her call a vote either. A few weeks ago, Fox told me privately that he will not allow any substantive gun control measures to move in the 2014 session.*

The interesting question is whether he will extend this ban to something as minor as a tweak in permitting authority. In many ways, it makes political sense for him. Letting a measure this tiny get a vote would allow Fox to pretend he is doing something about gun violence, while avoiding actually doing anything about gun violence. Of course, if he is so deeply ideologically committed to the NRA that he opposes any step forward, he will once again deny the people of Exeter this small public safety measure, a measure they clearly want. It is up to Gordon Fox.

*Speaker Fox denies saying this to me, according to his office.  I stand by my words.

Exeter confirms polling: RI supports gun reform


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

gun-controlWhenever I try to convince state legislators that they should support basic, common-sense gun safety reforms, I frequently run into a puzzling obstacle. Members of the General Assembly irrationally believe they would pay a political price for opposing gun safety legislation. The people of Exeter just destroyed that argument.

This belief has always borne little relation to reality. Guns are a rare issue where we have decent Rhode Island polling. According to well-regarded national pollster PPP, the people of Rhode Island favor an assault weapons ban by a 37-point margin—ten points more than Obama carried this state by. Although Obama lost two state House seats, he lost them by less than ten points, and he won every single state Senate seat. Most likely, every single member of the General Assembly represents a district that supports an assault weapons ban.

Taken in November, a Projo/WPRI poll paints the same picture. By an extremely narrow margin, even Ocean State Republicans are more likely to say our gun laws do not go far enough than go too far. When Independents and Democrats are included, “not far enough” beats “go too far” by a much larger margin of 35 points. Given that the pollster, Fleming and Associates, is notoriously conservative, these numbers are probably soft. (They missed the race between David Cicilline and Brendan Doherty by 11 points.)

Because the real election for most seats in Rhode Island is the Democratic primary, these numbers heavily underestimate just how politically silly it is to oppose gun safety legislation. Among Democrats, support for an assault weapons ban is an absolutely brutal 86%-9%. By a nearly identical margin of 87%-8%, Rhode Island Democrats are more likely to trust Barack Obama on guns than the NRA. Yet the entire top Democratic leadership of the General Assembly—House Speaker Gordon Fox, Senate President Teresa Paiva-Weed, House Majority Leader Nick Mattiello, and Senate Majority Leader Dominick Ruggerio—each took thousands of dollars from the NRA. (The NRA’s Rhode Island PAC recently shut down in response to a campaign finance complaint I filed.)

Despite all the evidence, the conventional wisdom on Smith Hill is still that there is a political price to be paid for supporting reform. Probably because the gun people are so loud, far too many Democrats still doggedly believe that their districts oppose reform. The people of Exeter proved them wrong.

Exeter is hardly favorably turf for gun safety advocates. Obama only won the town by six points. As one of the most rural parts of the state, one might think it would have a relatively high rate of gun ownership. This was an off-cycle election, where the NRA’s famed organizing muscle would play to the best advantage. And most importantly, this was a general election not dominated by the more liberal Democratic primary electorate. Yet we still won convincingly. Exeter voters defeated the recall 63%-37%.

If we can win on the gun issue in a general election in Exeter, we should be able to easily win on this issue in a Democratic primary in, say, Warwick.  Senator Michael McCaffrey, take notice.

No more silence: Moms Demand Action remembers Newtown


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

1458421_541967862563877_716115389_nToday at 9:15am, at at least 15 churches throughout Rhode Island, as well as states scattered across America, church bells were rung in remembrance of the 20 children and 6 adults who senselessly lost their lives to gun violence at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown CT one year ago. Though at the time it was believed by many that here was finally an event the state and federal legislatures could not ignore and that finally some meaningful legislation might be passed to start curbing excessive gun violence in the United States, to date no meaningful legislation has been passed.

Hence the event No More Silence, put together by Moms Demand Action Rhode Island and the RI Coalition to prevent Gun Violence held at the First Unitarian Church of Providence on Benevolent St. US Representative David Cicciline, Central Falls Mayor James Diosa, Reverend Donald Anderson, Julia Wyman and Samantha Richards and Sydney Montstream-Quas of Moms Demand Action spoke passionately for common sense changes to our existing gun laws. Music was provided by the Gordon School Handbell Ensemble, which fit in nicely with the ringing of the church bells at 9:35am…

Not far from the minds of any of the over 120 people in attendance was the shooting death of 12 year old honor student Aynis Vargas in Providence, who died shortly after the Rhode Island General Assembly failed to pass any kind of gun law reform.

Could action by the General Assembly have prevented her death? Video from the event is below.

When the NRA says jump, Doreen Costa asks how high


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

costaThe recall election in Exeter, scheduled for December 14th,  is being pushed through mostly by out-of-town gun rights zealots intent on punishing the Exeter Town Council for trying to enact a minor change in the law regarding the concealed weapon permit system. Rhode Island State Representative Doreen Costa has been involved in this issue from the beginning. Even though she is not a resident of Exeter, she does represent a small section of the town  (the corner over by the Yawgoo Ski Area) in the Rhode Island General Assembly

What the Exeter Town Council attempted to do was change the law in Rhode Island so that the Exeter Town Clerk would no longer be responsible for issuing concealed weapon permits. In most cities and towns residents can go either to their police chiefs or to the state Attorney General, but Exeter has no police force. So by state law, the duty of issuing permits falls to the Town Clerk, a person with no law enforcement training.

On November 11, 2011, Costa agreed with the majority of the Exeter Town Council on the matter. According to the minutes of the regular meeting of the Exeter Town Council from November 11, 2011 Costa originally maintained that “she does not think the responsibility [for issuing concealed weapon permits] should be on the Town Clerk” and that she “is looking into possible help from the State Police on the matter.”

However, at a special Exeter Town Council meeting held on March 11, 2013, Doreen Costa changed her position for the benefit of the large crowd of gun enthusiasts in the audience. As can be seen in the video of the meeting posted on YouTube (starting at eight minutes 49 seconds) Costa used her time to read a letter from Darin Goens of the National Rifle Association, and addressed her comments primarily to the audience, not to the Town Council. The letter presented the NRA’s position that the Exeter Town Clerk should maintain responsibility for issuing concealed weapon’s permits, a position Costa now agrees with.

This begs the question, does Doreen Costa represent the citizens of Rhode Island or the interests of the NRA?

You can help fight this pernicious recall by going to saveexeter.org

GOP Rep: House Majority Leader Mattiello is ‘on our side’


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

MattielloOne of the most clarifying moments in Rhode Island politics is when the small handful of conservative Republicans in our state admit just how conservative the Democratic leadership of the General Assembly is.  This nugget showed up in a post by Tea Party Republican Michael Chippendale on the RI Gun Blog:

After this past session’s overwhelming victory for gun owners, the progressive caucus openly chastised – and literally had a screaming match with the Majority Leader (who is on our side), and Speaker Fox for failing to get the Assault Weapons ban passed as well as the other anti-gun legislation.

Representative Chippendale is calling it like it is.  Nominally a Democrat, House Majority Leader Nick Mattiello has an A+ rating from the NRA.  They’ve flooded him with thousands of dollars of campaign contributions–contributions that are probably illegal.

Chippendale also reveals that “70% of the House of Representatives knows, respects, and covets the NRA rating and endorsement system that occurs each election year.”

This isn’t the first time Rhode Island’s tiny group of real Republicans has praised the Democratic leadership of the House of Representatives for their right-wing extremism on guns.  Here’s Tea Party Representative Doreen Costa thanking Speaker Gordon Fox for being “very, very kind to us gun folks”:

Wingmen: Put your money where your mouth is


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

wingmen1025Should the public sector invest its savings based on our social values?

Of course we should! That such a question can even be debated speaks volumes about what our values are: making money. Though, as my TV arch nemesis Justin Katz points out, it would be a great follow up if that gun stock turns out to be a real dog!

News, Weather and Classifieds for Southern New England

 

NRA PAC leaves RI politics


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

The local political action committee for NRA has gone away, according to the state Board of Elections. And Sam Bell of the Rhode Island Progressive Democrats thinks it might be because his group filed a campaign finance complaint against them.

“As far as we are aware, the Board of Elections has yet to issue a formal ruling, but we view this move as confirmation of the seriousness of the violations we have alleged,” Bell said in an email. “We hope that the Board will issue appropriate fines after a thorough and complete investigation.”

According to records, the NRA Political Victory Fund dissolved on September 26. In September the RI Progressive Democrats filed a complaint alleging that the local NRA PAC is lying on campaign disclosure forms when it claims to have received at least 1,500 donations of $100 or less.

Ric Thonton, who oversees campaign finance matters for the Board of Elections, said he could neither confirm nor comment on investigations. But he did say, “the dissolution of a PAC does not prevent it from being investigated.”

Rhode Island isn’t known as a hotbed of gun rights, but it has been a hotbed of gun politics lately. Republicans were embarrassed for raffling off an assault rifle at a gun club fundraiser and Exeter Town Councilors are facing a recall election for outsourcing handgun permitting to the state police. Meanwhile, both Providence and the state are divesting from investments in guns.

NRAPACClosureScannedForm

 

Providence pioneered gun divestment in RI


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Far be it for RI Future to give Gina Raimondo credit for an initiative pioneered in Providence but that’s exactly what I did yesterday when I applauded her for suggesting the state divest from guns. The State Investment Commission did vote to stop investing in a company that sells guns yesterday, but the Capital City voted to divest from guns back on March 18.

“The City Council has a moral responsibility to ensure that no public money is being used in the manufacture of weapons that are endangering public safety,” said the resolution passed by the Council. “Now, therefore, be it resolved, that the Providence City Councîl does hereby urge the Providence Boaïd of Investment Commissioners to continue its review of the pension investments to determine whether or not its portfolio includes equity firms that have holdings in companies that manufaeîure assauìî weapons and divest from any such firms.”

PVD Gun Divestment

 

Divest pension funds from guns, but don’t stop there


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

gina linc pensionDivesting from dangerous weapons is a step in the right direction, and I applaud Gina Raimondo’s effort to make our pension fund more socially responsible. This blog doesn’t often have opportunity to agree with the hedge fund-loving general treasurer, but I certainly hope the State Investment Commission takes her advice and takes our money out of a company that distributes guns.

I’d also encourage Raimondo and the others who control Rhode Island’s $7 billion nest egg to look hard for other opportunities to be more socially responsible with our money. This would be a pension reform progressives would be proud to support, and would be better for our economy than cutting COLAs or enriching hedge fund managers.

Divestment, or socially responsible investing, is already a movement in Rhode Island. The Providence City Council recently voted to make its investment portfolio better match its values (what that will look like still remains to be seen) and Brown Divest Coal has long advocated for the Ivy League endowment to take its money out of companies that harm the environment.

Here’s hoping Seth Magaziner’s political ambitions will help shine a bright light on why socially responsible investing is a better bet for Main Street. High finance can be community-minded. And the more it is, the more profitable being community-minded will become.

Carpetbagger gun advocates seek to overturn 2012 election


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
The Exeter Four, left to right: Cal Ellis, Bill Monahan, Council President Arlene Hicks and Bob Johnson.
The Exeter Four, left to right: Cal Ellis, Bill Monahan, Council President Arlene Hicks and Bob Johnson.

The Exeter Board of Canvassers has certified that the Cranston-based RI Firearms Owners’ League has succeeded in getting enough signatures – over 600, or roughly 10% of the number of people who voted in recent Exeter elections – to force a special recall election against four sitting Town Council members. The four targeted members just happen to be Democrats, and nearly all of the petition organizers are Republicans.

“They’re trying to overturn the results of the 2012 election,” said Town Council member Bob Johnson. “They told people things that weren’t true and many voters have told me they felt they were tricked into signing.”

At issue: the vote by the Exeter Town Council on a resolution asking the General Assembly to designate the RI State Police as the agency that would issue concealed carry firearms permits in Exeter, and Exeter alone.

The reason: Exeter is the only one of Rhode Island’s cities and towns that does not have its own police force; the RI State Police perform that function in Exeter. The only “police” official in town is the honorary Town Sergeant, an older gentleman who doesn’t use a computer.

Because of the unique lack of a town police force, Exeter lacks the ability to conduct the required background check to issue a concealed carry permit. The only “police” official in town is the honorary Town Constable, an elderly gentleman who doesn’t know how to use a computer. The Town Clerk does not have access to the proper databases to conduct background checks.

The decision by the Council majority to ask the legislature to transfer that responsibility to the same agency that does the town’s policing – the State Police – was characterized by the Cranston-based Firearms Owners’ League as an attack on gun owners’ rights and a dishonorable surrender of Exeter’s sovereignty rights. Incidentally, the legislation sought by the Exeter Council did not get out of committee.

Johnson asserts the Town Council resolution was neither an attack on lawful gun owners’ rights nor a surrender of the town’s rights. “I support gun rights. I’m a gun owner myself. We just wanted to make sure that concealed carry permits were properly issued.”

But no good deed or sensible act goes unpunished.

The RI Firearm Owners’ League set up a front group as a political action committee called “We the People of Exeter.” Except it isn’t. The headquarters of the group is Fiskeville, which is in Cranston.

The head of the group is Glenn Valentine, who is not an Exeter resident. Included among the founders of “We the People of Exeter” are Raymond Bradley III who lives on South County Trail in Charlestown, David Elkeland of Newport and Roger Swann of Hopkinton.

Only three actual Exeter residents are listed as officials of “We the People of Exeter:” Joseph St. Lawrence, Lance Edwards and former state Senator Frank Maher.

Frank Maher (R), as you may recall, represented the northern end of Charlestown, as well as Richmond and Exeter, for two terms before being soundly beaten by current Senator Catherine Cool Rumsey (D).

Frank Maher’s two terms were marked by negligible accomplishments. He was best known for a bill he sponsored to lighten the penalties on criminals who use crossbows in the commission of violent crimes. Maher also sponsored legislation to eliminate the three knock-down rule in boxing, apparently preferring to have fighters beat each other’s brains out.

Maher is listed as the Treasurer of “We the People of Exeter.”

The radical nature of the recall petition and lies told about the Exeter Council’s effort to resolve the concealed carry background check problem has all the hallmarks of a Doreen Costa campaign.

Costa is a Tea Party Republican (“Teapublican”) who is in her second term in the state House of Representatives representing primarily North Kingstown, but also a part of Exeter. Costa has championed Tea Party causes and fashions herself as a Little Rhody version of Sarah Palin, right down to her unconditional love of guns and complete disdain for gun regulation, however sensible.

So far, Costa has not come out publicly in the Exeter recall, but her fingerprints are all over it.

Perhaps Costa is too embarrassed to weigh in publicly, since she actually agreed with the Town Council majority in November 2011 that the Town Clerk should not be issuing concealed carry permits. Where is Costa on the issue now, some Exeter folks are wondering?

Costa has sponsored six bills for the RI Firearm Owners’ League.

Now that the Exeter petitions have been certified, the Board of Canvassers must set an election date to occur within 20 to 60 days. Most likely, the recall election will be held in December.

If voters vote YES for the recall of any of the four targeted Democratic Council members, they will be replaced by the next-highest vote-getter.

The four Democrats defeated three Republicans in 2012 to win their seats. If all four Democrats are recalled, the three Republicans they defeated in 2012 will take their seats and will then appoint a fourth person – with no voter input – to fill the fifth seat.

There are so many things wrong with this picture. First, there’s the ability of a non-resident group to run an ideologically-centered campaign to topple Exeter’s 2012 election. There’s the twisted, if not flat out false, language that was used in the recall petition and the lies that were told to voters when they were asked to sign.

The spokespeople for the gun owners’ PAC say the recall was necessitated because the Council majority did not listen to the will of the people. Yet, the attacks against the Council’s attempt to seek a rational gun permit background check was mounted primarily by people from outside of Exeter seeking to make an ideological point.

Supporters of the targeted Exeter Town Council members are gearing up to fight, fully intending to battle the recall and win the recall election.

They’ve set up a website called SaveExeter.org. Go to that website and click on the documents to see for yourself what this recall is really all about.

This kind of radical, anti-democratic (small d) attack on the integrity of the electoral process is dangerous and must be stopped. If you would like to help, you can contribute by clicking here, or contact SaveExeter if you want to volunteer to help.

(Ed. note: This post originally appeared on Progressive Charlestown blog. Thanks to Will Collette for thinking to share it with us. Also, full disclosure, Exeter Town Councilor Cal Ellis was a teacher of mine in high school, as was his wife, Lois Ellis, who owns the famous Scailo Bros. bakery on Atwells Ave.)

Are Rhode Island Republicans gun nuts?

gunnutOne of the most interesting outcomes to the Rhode Island Republican Party raffling off a semi-automatic machine gun is that it shows how truly disparate the different wings of the conservative movement in the Ocean State are.

For example, while Justin Katz posted this on Twitter: “Memo to RI conservatives: Stand against the prudes’ moral bullying. It will only continue to expand.”

Meanwhile, the Rhode Island Young Republicans posted this to Facebook:

Eight emails have hit my inbox today re: the insensitivity of the RI GOP’s semi automatic gun raffle, and some new attendees’ concerns re: attending a republican event tomorrow. PLEASE note that the YRs are not beholden to the state party, have no funding from them (all of our events are self-funded or sponsored by the Roosevelt Society), and tend to have a very different tone. The only connection is that by charter, the chairman (me) sits on their E-board (although to be honest, we’ve only had one e-board meeting since we came into existence, so impact is non existent). Tomorrow night with Commissioner Gist is NOT a RI GOP event. We look forward to continuing to promote the big tent philosophy, and being the next generation’s problem solvers (Lord knows we have a lot to work with).

It seems both the Democratic and Republican parties are suffering from somewhat similar ideological rifts on how to handle the politics of guns.

MSNBC doesn’t understand Rhode Island


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

photo id lawMSNBC does some great reporting.  But when it comes to Rhode Island, America’s left-leaning news channel is missing a good scoop.

For example: Last night, All In with Chris Hayes (incidentally, a fantastic show) displayed a map showing the states that with photo ID laws in effect and the states where laws are going into effect in upcoming elections. Rhode Island was missing.  We should have been on the list of states with photo ID beginning in future elections.

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Hayes attributes the information to the National Conference of State Legislatures, but the NCSL confirms what we already know–the photo ID portion of the Ocean State’s voter ID law phases in in 2014.

According to legislative spokesman LarryBerman, the 2012 non-photo voter ID rules will apply in Woonsocket’s November election, but the 2014 election will require a photo ID unless the General Assembly repeals the law during the 2014 session.  

To be honest, I have a lot of sympathy for Hayes and his team.  In the midst of working flat out to deliver some truly stunning reporting on the government shutdown, I can understand how All In might not think to check whether a deep blue state like Rhode Island would have passed such a Republican law.

Also understandable is Rachel Maddow’s April segment on gun control in Rhode Island:

Nine bills that include a ban on assault weapons and high capacity magazines and improving the reporting of mental health information to the state’s background check systems. It’s fairly comprehensive package, these nine bills.

Now, in terms of whether or not this fifth state is likely to pass the legislation they’re considering, it may helpful (sic) to consider the partisan background of what the legislature looks like in Rhode Island.

Yes, do not adjust your television sets. It really is that lopsided.  There are eight Republicans for the 29 Democrats in the state Senate. And there are six Republicans for the 69 Democrats in the statehouse. Wow.

Rhode Island will have a debate over these measures and some may be changed by virtue of the debate, but this partisan breakdown in the state means these measures will likely pass.

Maddow’s bold prediction was wrong.  The bills failed spectacularly.  The assault weapons ban and even the patch that would have closed a loophole that helps minors access guns never even got a vote.  The only bills that moved were two token bills to increase penalties for having a stolen gun or a gun with the serial numbers shaved off and a third to set up a study commission.  As tea party Rep Doreen Costa (R-North Kingstown) said in her floor speech on the bills that did move, “we’re all really happy.”

Maddow’s prediction was not so absurd.  In any other state, she would have been completely correct.  But not in Rhode Island, where the Speaker of the House, the President of the Senate, the House Majority Leader, and the Senate Majority Leader–all Democrats–have each taken thousands of dollars from the NRA.  And I believe those contributions were illegal.  (The Board of Elections is still deliberating on my complaint.)  As Doreen Costa put it, Speaker Gordon Fox (D-Providence) was “very, very kind to us gun folks.”

See Costa’s speech here:

I should note that there are two small errors in Maddow’s piece.  Her party numbers for the Senate seem to be the old breakdown from before the 2012 election, with the one Independent left out for some reason.  The second error had to do with the package itself.  There was no bill to fix mental health information reporting in the package.  Instead, there was a bill to set up a committee to think about maybe putting in a bill to do the reporting.  It’s a pretty important difference.

I hope MSNBC will issue a correction.  But what I really want is for them to cover the real story, the story of right-wingers taking over the Rhode Island Democratic Party.

Gallagher And Gun Control


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Stand-up “comic” Gallagher demonstrates how not to prepare a watermelon for consumption.

Ever tried to pry out a nail with a screwdriver or pave a driveway with plastic resin? No? That’s because you’re smart enough to use the right tool for the right job. Which is why the “hammers, knives and baseball bats kill more people than guns, but they’re not regulated” argument used by Second Amendment absolutists is so ridiculously laughable.

On it’s face, the argument seems plausible. Hammers, knives, and baseball bats are, in fact, used more frequently as weapons in assault and homicide cases, and  are considered deadly weapons, but only when they are used IMPROPERLY. One could also throw cars and most industrial chemicals into the mix with the aforementioned tools, but they are regulated to some degree, and the rights to use them can be rescinded if a person or business is found to be using them improperly.

Guns are deadly weapons when used PROPERLY. In fact, their primary – some might say only – function is the incapacitation and killing of things.

Try slicing a canteloupe with a shotgun. You’ll wind up with a mess that can only be cleaned up by rags or a vacuum cleaner, which, by the way, could also be used as deadly weapons. The wrong tool for fruit preparation does nothing but create a mess. This has been proven ad nauseum by once popular 80’s stand-up/prop comic Gallagher.

Try hammering a nail with a handgun. Chances are the nail will have to be removed with a crowbar (the right tool). I suppose you could use your teeth (the wrong tool), but your orthodontist may advise against this. You might also have to be driven to the hospital after your ‘handgun as hammer’ experiment. I’d suggest that you use an automobile (the right tool) rather than a hot air balloon (the wrong tool).

Try hitting the game winning base hit for your weekend softball game with a gas-powered carbine rifle. You’ll probably wind up with a dribbler down the third base line that will get you picked off before you make it halfway to first. When you decide that your swing needs some work, I’d suggest a trip to the batting cages (right tool) rather than a trip to the deli (wrong tool).

I am not anti-gun. I think that reasonable, responsible adults should be allowed to own firearms, but reasonable, responsible adults should also support reasonable, responsible gun registration and regulation.

Lost in the disingenous din of debate on gun control is any talk of the responsibility of manufacturers. Reasonable gun control needs to start at the manufacturer level. How’s this for a reasonable gun control law: Firearm retailers may only carry one display/test model of any particular weapon, and if a purchase is made, the gun is only shipped to the dealer when the customer has passed a background check and mental health assessment.

With enough thought and creativity, just about anything can be used as a deadly weapon, but firearms are only useful for one thing: inflicting harm on – or causing the death of – another living thing. Let’s keep this fact in mind when we talk about regulating guns, and stop equating the intended application of firearms with the unintended application of other tools.


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387