RI celebrates rebounding economy this Labor Day


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

2016-05-09 Raimondo in Warwick 005Each year on Labor Day we honor the hardworking women and men that drive our state’s economy forward. This has been an encouraging time of growth and momentum for workers, with Rhode Island gaining 5,000 jobs this year and a new national report showing we rank higher than every other New England state for advanced industry job growth.

Rhode Islanders are returning to work rebuilding our roads and bridges through RhodeWorks, modernizing our schools with the School Building Authority, and completing green energy retrofit projects through the Infrastructure Bank. We’re attracting new high-wage jobs from out of state, like GE Digital, and some of our biggest employers are doubling down on the state, including Citizens Bank. We have a long way to go, but it’s clear we are moving in the right direction.

Labor Day is an important time to recommit to supporting and protecting our workers. It’s why we raised our minimum wage last year and we’re working to do it again. We’re cracking down on misclassification and going after companies that break the rules to ensure that every worker gets a fair day’s pay for a fair day’s work.

Our resilient and tireless workers do everything they can to grow our economy and strengthen our middle class. And in turn, I’ll be relentless in doing everything I can to ensure everyone has the opportunity to make it in Rhode Island.

I wish all Rhode Islanders a safe and happy Labor Day.

Raimondo tours East Providence screen-printing shop, talks jobs plan


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Nelson Silva, the owner of Graphic Ink, a screen-printing and embroidery shop in East Providence, likes to joke that he normally works half days- 6 am to 6 pm. That’s what he told Governor Gina Raimondo Wednesday afternoon when she toured Graphic Ink in an effort to spread information about her different economic initiatives, and how they would help small businesses like Silva’s.

Nelson Silva shows Gov. Raimondo, Lieutenant Gov. McKee, and Sec. Pryor shirts made by his staff.
Nelson Silva shows Gov. Raimondo, Lieutenant Gov. McKee, and Sec. Pryor shirts made by his staff.

“This business, [with] 17, 18 employees, this is the lifeblood of Rhode Island’s economy. Most Rhode Islanders work for companies just like this, [with] 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 employees,” Raimondo said. “So, as governor, I am very focused on making it easier to do business, less expensive to do business.”

Some of the initiatives that Raimondo spoke about were big parts of the state budget, like the elimination of the sales tax on energy for businesses, as well as decreasing the corporate minimum tax from $500 to $450. Raimondo also took the time to highlight other parts of her jobs plan, such as the streetscape improvement fund, a small business assistance program run by the Commerce Corporation, and a program for “innovation vouchers.”

“Think of it as a coupon,” Raimondo said. “You can come to the Commerce Corporation, get a coupon, and then redeem your coupon at one of our local universities to get access to R&D. If you have a new technology you want to investigate, if you’re a healthcare company, if one of your clients is a healthcare company, a lot of the times they want access to a research team at URI or Brown or RISD or Johnson & Wales. Get the coupon from the Commerce Corporation, check it in with the university, and have special access. We’re trying to promote more innovation.”

Silva, who has owned and operated Graphic Ink since 1997, said that he was very excited for the governor to come visit his shop, and expressed support for her jobs plan.

“I think her plan that she’s launching is right on point with where small businesses need to be, and small businesses are the backbone of the state in my opinion,” Silva said. “It’s very exciting to hear that she is really encouraging to support small businesses.”

Silva said initiatives like the energy sales tax elimination and the roadside improvements continue to make it easier for his business, and businesses like his, to keep employing people, and therefore invest in the local community. He even said that he believes that, because the state is on an economic upturn, that Rhode Islanders are more likely to invest in small businesses.

Graphic Ink in East Providence, RI.
Graphic Ink in East Providence, RI.

“I believe she has recharged the state in a way that, there are many people, companies, organizations, colleges, that have a lot of activity going on. We are an event-based business. We produce things for events. There are lots of things going on, which in turn makes us a busy shop,” he said.

According to Silva, this increase in activity, and reinvestment in small businesses, has opened up a lot of jobs in the community, which is looking for skilled workers. In his opinion, now that the economy is beginning to heal, the next logical step is to work on getting vocational education programs out there for students to become trained laborers right out of high school, or in college. Silva said that he is always willing to train an employee on site, but some positions do require skilled labor, such as graphics or design.

With all of these changes, Silva envisions a bright future for small businesses in Rhode Island.

“I see small business, in my case, [becoming] stronger and stronger, as the owners and employees are willing to put some effort into it. As long as we put some effort into it and work hard, hard work pays off.”

Study shows carbon tax would bring 2,000-4,000 jobs to RI


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Graphic courtesy of EnergizeRI
Graphic courtesy of EnergizeRI

A new study says a carbon tax in the state would create between 2,000 and 4,000 jobs, as well as create up to $900 million in state revenue by 2040. Scott Nystrom, a senior economic associate and project manager for Regional Economic Models, Inc. presented the study’s findings at Brown University.

Sponsored by the Energize Rhode Island Coalition, REMI’s study examined the possible benefits and consequences of instituting such a tax in the state.

Introduced this year, the Carbon Pricing Act has been tabled for the session but will be resubmitted next year. The bill, if passed, would be the first of its kind in the United States, setting an environmental standard for the rest of the country. More information can be found here.

Energize Rhode Island is currently promoting the Clean Energy Investment and Carbon Pricing Act, which would impose a carbon price (or tax) on all fossil fuels at the first point of sale within the state. The price would be $15 per ton of carbon dioxide for the first year the act is in effect, and raise at a rate of $5 per year.

The Carbon Pricing Act has two main goals – to provide a disincentive for using fossil fuel revenue to compensate for the cost of moving toward green energy. The price would be returned to Rhode Island’s economy in four different ways: a dividend check to households, a dividend to employers based on their share of state employment, a fund for energy efficiency costs, and administrative overhead.

According to REMI’s analysis, Rhode Island would receive positive benefits from implementing a carbon price.

“You actually have more jobs in Rhode Island that you would have otherwise with this policy,” Nystrom said during his presentation. Although the impact is relatively small, only around 1 percent of the jobs in the state, that’s still 2,000 to 4,000 jobs that were not there before. The Coalition says 1,000 of these jobs would be created within the first two years of the price’s introduction.

Total gross state product would rise as well, with the construction industry gaining roughly $86 million. The only industry that takes a serious hit due to the price is chemical manufacturing, which would lose $16 million. Real personal income would also increase between $80 and $100 million dollars during that time.

Nystrom also explained that instituting a carbon price could result in a population increase.

“Because the labor market is stronger, it draws more people to the state to an extent,” he said. “They move into the state as a consequence of the labor market, they buy a house, they settle down, and they increase the state’s population.”

With all of the new jobs and people living in Rhode Island, state revenues would be on the rise as well, earning between $200 and $900 million through the 2030s.

For all these benefits, cost of living would only increase minimally.

“Even though this does increase the cost of energy for states, It’s about a half a percent,” Nystrom said. “This means you have three months of extra inflection between now and 2040 than you would have otherwise.”

Carbon emissions were not the main focus of the study, but Nystrom did add that they would decrease over the course of a few years, and then stabilize.

“Emissions are purely a byproduct,” he said. “This is a result of the model.”

Jim Vincent: 40 percent of ‘youth of color’ ages 18 – 24 are unemployed


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

jim_vincent

“Over 40 percent of the youth of color between the ages of 10 and 24 are unemployed,” Jim Vincent, executive director of the Providence branch of the NAACP. “That’s a recipe for disaster.”

Because of this, the lack of good public schools in the urban core and the general feeling that the streets there have become less safe has inspired he and others who fight for social justice to hold a press event today at 4:30 in front of the Garrahy Judicial Complex in Providence today.

Vincent told me some 12 community organizations are coming together to advocate for a safer city, better education and a firmer commitment that Rhode Island’s urban core will not be left behind.

Listen to our conversation here:

Rebuilding Rhode Island’s Economy, Part 1: Economic Development 101


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Unemployment LineI am of the mind that the biggest issue facing the state right now is the sluggish economy.  I know many share this belief.  With that in mind, I will be focusing my (unfortunately limited) time writing specifically on creative strategies to improve Providence’s and the state’s economy, and thinking about it from the perspective of the upcoming gubernatorial and Providence Mayoral campaigns (i.e., what do the candidates have to say about what I write?).  Before I delve into specific suggestions, I believe there are a few items relevant to economic growth that need to be clarified at the outset.

State House

First, there isn’t much the government can do to improve the economy directly, particularly in this climate of economic distress and innovation paralysis.  When the economy is running smoothly, most folks want the government to “stay out of the way.”  But when the economy tanks, policymakers are the first to be blamed (this is a disingenuous and undeserved complaint), and everyone wants them to “fix it.”  First, you can’t have it both ways people.  Second, there is no magic solution to “fixing” the economy.

Second, economic growth takes time, commitment, alignment on a vision, and the autonomy to make things happen.  It is unlikely to see radically positive results in a few months or even a couple years.  Economic development is a decades-long strategy, that often requires partnerships and long-term planning that are challenging for public officials, policymakers, and civil service staff.  While the pain of recessions, joblessness, and foreclosures is real, there are often few options for state and local officials to ease that pain.

Third, everything matters to economic development: education, transportation, infrastructure, workforce, land-use, zoning, existing markets, history, taxes, regulations, natural assets, etc.  But each of these matter to varying degrees depending on the industrial sector and individual businesses.  To assume that “lowering taxes” or “reducing regulations” is the most important of considerations is foolish, ill-advised, offensive, and immeasurably distracting from the various other issues that are generally much more important for long-term economic success.  While everything is important, some things are more important than others.

winner and loserFourth, every strategy comes with trade-offs and there are always winners and losers with any policy change.  Typically, those with wealth and power can influence policy to their benefit.  And while this may benefit them personally, or as a group, there are long-term consequences for the economy that are generally ignored.  The incremental policy decisions that have been made in the past have led to our little state to lack the sufficient resiliency to bounce back from the recent and ongoing depression/recession.  The economic conditions in which Rhode Island finds itself will take many, many years to rectify.

Fifth, demand for goods and services drives the supply of goods and services.  If no one wants to buy stuff, stuff doesn’t get made, and people lose their jobs.  Most tools that are deployed by cities and towns and the state try to stimulate the economy do not address economic demand, and as such they are largely inefficient and/or ineffective.

Sixth, underlying everything is an often ignored but crucial criterion: the importance of inclusive and dispersed economic growth.  The benefits of economic growth need to be broadly shared because the more people who earn money, and the more money that they earn, the higher the level of economic growth.  When economic growth benefits a small (and shrinking) number of people, aggregate demand declines and the economy suffers.  When a rising tide actually lifts all boats, something that the post-WWII economy was notable for, everyone benefits.  When a growing number of boats are chained to the bottom of the ocean, as has been the experience from the mid-1970s onward (with a notable exception during the 1990s), the economy flounders, people fall deeper in debt to maintain their standard of living, and the economy slows.

"I must break you."
“I must break you.”

Seventh, the ONLY way the state (or any state, region, city, etc.) can be successful in the long-run is by improving its competitiveness in particular economic areas.  This can be done by increasing the productivity of existing businesses through innovation or better trained employees or achieving higher workforce participation rates, while ALSO supporting the high and rising wages and living standards of Rhode Islanders.  Period.  This is hard to do, but not impossible.  The role the city and state can play is to lay the groundwork for an iterative process of successive improvements to support business productivity gains and assist with the dispersion of economic benefits.

Eighth, when we discuss economic development, it’s important to differentiate between locally-traded clusters, sectors, and industries and those that are subject to larger markets, regional, national, or global in scope.  The first group includes restaurants, local health services, residential housing construction, etc. while the second group includes software development, manufacturing, higher education, etc.  The success of the first group is largely dependent upon the success of the latter.  To put it another way, an economy can only grow by exporting lots of high-value goods and services and bringing in money to the state from other parts of the country / world.  The degree to which the economy is exposed to and successfully competes in global markets is the single largest factor that explains how successful its local economy is.  This isn’t to say that the local economy isn’t important, just that everyone selling hamburgers to each other does not grow the economy.

Finally, businesses grow at various points over their lifecycle.  The only businesses that are guaranteed to have net positive job growth are new businesses, for the obvious reason that they will employ at minimum the owner of the business and they have no current employees to let go.  Many businesses grow to a certain size and stay there for their entire existence.  Many businesses have dramatic fluctuations in their employment based on seasonal or market demand.  Some businesses have limited but sustained growth.  And only a few businesses experience pronounced growth, and that growth is generally limited to a short period of time.  All of this is important when it comes to growing jobs because there are only limited opportunities to identify and support existing businesses during their growth phases.  But the opportunities are innumerable to support new business growth, and it is new business startups that have been responsible for net new job growth in the past decade.

There are additional factors that contribute or impede economic growth, but in my mind, the 9 above are of paramount importance.  Feel free to bookmark this post as I will update it as I begin listing specific strategies to Rebuild Rhode Island!

Why Stock Buybacks Benefit Corporate Greed


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Image courtesy of Hodart Report.

One of my last posts touched on how corporations are spending their money, what they are doing and not doing with the piles of record profits they’ve been making in the past few years while median wages have stagnated or fallen.

Here’s some additional information. First, the cites:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444657804578052472320753336.html

http://www.thereformedbroker.com/2012/10/12/the-buyback-epidemic/

If you piece the two of them together, you will glean that dividend payments to shareholders are near an all-time low. Something like 34% of earnings are being paid out in dividends today. OTOH, stock buybacks by the S&P 500 hit $112 billion just for the second quarter of 2012. You will also learn that, in contrast, companies paid out about 60% of their earnings in dividends in 1960. This is despite a top tax rate of 91%. No, that’s not a typo. 91%.

Why the preference for stock buybacks over dividend payments? Again, apply the principle of ‘cui bono’: to whose benefit?

Dividends generally benefit the average holder, the smaller holders. In fact, as I’ve said before, prior to about 1990, one bought stocks in order to collect the dividend paid, not with the idea of the price of the stock going up. In fact, stocks like utilities were considered ‘widows and orphans’ stocks because of the generous dividends they generally paid.

Buybacks, OTOH, generally benefit the corporate executives because the bulk of their compensation is in company stock. One component in the price per share of stocks is the number of shares outstanding. In fact, it’s the denominator in the equation. Since corporate compensation comes from huge issues of common stock, the denominator grows, which drops the average price, which means that the shares executives increase in value. Shares that are bought back are retired, decreasing the number of shares outstanding, which has the impact of pushing the price up, other things being equal.

Yes, the average holder gains from this too, but the benefit is much more limited. Let’s say I own 1,000 shares, which is a big holding for most middle-class folks. If the price goes up a dollar, I’ve made $1,000. Not bad. But if I own 100,000, or 500,000 shares, the gain is much higher. And grants of hundreds of thousands of shares are not unusual. An executive holding a million share is not unusual.

Plus, this gain is completely tax-free, until the stock is sold. This benefits the executive who can then borrow against the shares and perform feats of legerdemain with the money. The small holder, OTOH, will generally never see the benefit f the capital appreciation because s/he is less likely to sell shares.

Yes, they may, and then turn around and buy others. However, this sort of trading mentality is very dangerous for the small investor. 80% of professional investors do not ‘beat the market’ through frequent trading. If these professionals can’t, then what chance does the small investor have? A small one, and then usually only for a short time before regression to the mean sets in. The safest strategy for the small investor is to buy stocks that pay a decent dividend and hold them for the income. Now, that few companies do this any longer is certainly a problem. Once again, the market is tilted in favor of the larger investor who can make a lot of money on fairly small increases in price, or who can hedge, or who has access to resources and information that the small investor does not have.

Cui bono? The corporate executive.

In the WSJ (yes, Wall St Journal), note the following quote:

        …More than seven decades ago, in his classic book “Security Analysis”, the great investor Benjamin  Graham made a call so radical that it still sounds shocking today. Complaining of the “despotic powers wielded over dividend policy by corporate executives and directors, Graham argued that companies should no longer be allowed to direct surplus cash away from paying dividends–even for reinvesting in the business–without first obtaining formal “consideration and appraisal” from their investors, most likely through a vote at the annual meeting.

 

        Capitalist to his core, Graham was dead serious with this Bolshevik-sounding suggestion.  He wanted shareholders–who, after all, own the company–to force management to provide at least a general justification for using cash for any purpose other than paying a dividend.

 

      With the percentage of profits paid out as dividends today near all-time lows, at 34%,  Graham’s drastic proposal is just what we need to cattle-prod companies out of being such skinflints.

One “argument” that tax-cutters like to use is that it’s our money, not Washington’s. Fair enough. But those corporate profits belong to the shareholders, not to the CEO. So why should the CEO decide?

(Yes, he is a shareholder, but he & his board almost never control a majority of shares. Plus, Graham’s point was to make them explain why they were not issuing larger dividends. You know, make them accountable? Radical notion, I realize. Only people on the bottom are accountable for anything. Those on top can do whatever they damn well please.)

(Point 2: the fact that dividends are ‘double taxed’ is completely irrelevant to the argument. But let’s put it this way: they are double taxed. So what? What difference does that make?)

Here’s how the other article describes the buyback/dividend issue:

…One other thing — executives use buybacks to offset compensation, they issue themselves shares or options, and then get the board to approve a stock buyback to counter the effect of dilution. If you’re asking yourself “wait, so buybacks can be used as a tool to transfer shareholder money to executives?”  then you’ve got it figured out, that’s exactly what they can be used for. And they often are.

As I said, cui bono? The corporate executive. He does not own the company. He–in theory, anyway–works for the shareholders, and yet he’s following policies that enrich himself (and it’s pretty much always a ‘he’) at the expense of those he works for. Somehow, I suspect that if he found an underling at the company doing something similar, the underling would be fired, if not prosecuted.

As an aside, the comments section of the WSJ article is hilarious. Note the utter horror–The horror! The horror!–with which they regard a tax rate of 39% on dividends. Somehow, the returns to capital should be privileged above actual work. And note how they throw out retirees who will be hurt by paying an hypothetical 39% in taxes on their dividend income, after the confiscatory Obama plan of letting the Bush tax cuts expire. But, 39% is the top tax rate. Only people making the highest incomes would pay at that rate. For the rest of us, we would pay at the rate we pay on the rest of our income. The only retirees who would be hit by the top tax rate are those who are earning in the top level of income.

One final word. A while back I wrote a post about how the purpose of allowing capital to accumulate was so that business could expand and benefit more people through hiring. IOW, there’s an implicit deal: we allow capital formation so you can increase the number of people you hire, which benefits everyone. However, the capital side of deal has not kept up its end of the bargain. For pointing this out, I was excoriated as a…whatever. You can fill in the blank. But this is exactly what is happening: the profits are not being reinvested in the US, those receiving the benefits of the profits are not paying taxes to support our society, even though they benefit disproportionately from the peace and security provided by the US government. They’ve breached the contract.

Finally finally, here’s something about the effects of income polarization.

    “If a man is not an oligarch, something is not right with him.”

http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/10/15/the-billionaires-next-door/

OK, feel free to excoriate mindlessly by calling me all sorts of names, and saying I’m wrong without ever quite showing how I’m wrong.

Income Inequality and Entry Level Wages


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Evidence shows that real wages for college grads fell in 2011. More: real wages for college grads are down from 2000, and real wages for college grads are down from 2004, the trough of the Bush recession. These wages did go up–sharply–in 2005, and then began a long, not-so-slow slide from which they have not begun to recover.

And yes, the link is to the Progressive Policy Institute, but the data is drawn from the Census Bureau’s annual Income, Poverty, and Health Care report for 2012 that was published recently. So this is standard gov’t data.  As the article makes clear, this is very significant information. It seriously cripples the argument that people can lift themselves up by getting a college degree. Or that income inequality is simply the premium paid for education.

So the graduate enters the real world to find that a) jobs are very hard to find; b) that those lucky enough to get a job are making less than they expected; and c) they have a mountain of debt to pay off. This latter was exacerbated by policy changes in the Bush era, which have been, thankfully, addressed by Obama.

But, no problem. This is all part of the Grand Plan to make sure that a) levels of income inequality continue to rise; and b) that these differences become stratified into place, resulting into a permanent caste system. Yes, this is the goal. Let the rich get richer, and let everyone else go to hell in a handbasket. That is what the corporate overlords want. Is this bordering on tinfoil-hat paranoia? Perhaps, at first glance, but let’s look at the evidence.

Income inequality shrank significantly between 1948 & 1973. Why? Because of deliberate government actions that fostered the downward redistribution of wealth. Unions were institutionalized, providing labor with a powerful voice to protect workers’ rights. The steady, significant, upward trend of real middle-class wages was the result of deliberate policy.

Another deliberate policy that fostered income redistribution was very high tax rates. Even after Reagan’s 1981 tax cuts, the top tax rate ‘fell’ to 50%. Prior, it was in the 70s, and it only ‘fell’ to 77% after being cut in 1964. I say we do what the GOP wants and emulate Reagan. Let’s put that 50% tax rate back in place. If it was good enough to St Ronnie, then it’s good enough for me, right?

And let’s make one thing clear: today’s “corporate titans” are not the steely-eyed heroes of a bad Ayn Rand novel. These are not entrepreneurs. They are bureaucrats. The guys sitting in the chairs at Citibank or GM or 3M or Exxon did not build their company from scratch. Yes, you have (or had) your occasional Steve Jobs and Bill Gates, companies like FedEx that grew into market behemoths, but they are, far and away, the exception and not the rule. The family-owned, family run corporate giants like Standard Oil or Dagny Talbert’s (Atlas Shrugged; yes, I read it) railroad barely exists today.

The point is, when a public corporation makes money, it can choose what to do with it. The corporation can return it to the owners–the shareholders–in the form of dividends. This was the traditional thing to do. Until sometime in the 1990s, buying stock in the expectation of the price going up so you could sell it was the definition of ‘speculation.’ Rather, one bought stock to hold it, so you could collect the 5% annual dividend. In some ways, IMO, the worst thing about the dot-com boom was the idea that dividends were ‘quaint’, and something only old-fogey companies did. Now, dividends of 2% are considered generous, and perhaps foolish. Apple, with all its money, has never paid a dividend.

Or, if a corporation chooses not to give the money to the real owners, another choice is to re-invest the money in the company by building another plant, or buying new, improved machinery. This is not happening. Business investment in this country is at its lowest level in decades. Yes, some companies are spending the money in other countries by outsourcing, but that doesn’t do a college grad in this country much good, does it?

So the corp is not returning the money to its real owners, the shareholders; nor is it re-investing the money in the company. How about higher wages?

Despite enormous productivity gains, wages–which is where we came in–are stagnant at best, falling at worst. In the period 1948-1973, there was a rough equivalency between productivity increases and wage increases. If an improved process makes the product cheaper, the profit margin increases. In the time to 1973, this extra profit was shared more or less equally by everyone in the company, workers and management alike. But, starting somewhere around 1980, this trend stopped. Oh, productivity has increased, dramatically at times, but wages have remained stagnant.

IOW, it’s gotten cheaper to do things, but that money is not being distributed to those who actually do the work. It’s being kept by management.

We are living in a time when corporate profits are at record high levels, and the percent of profits going to labor is at record lows for the post-Depression period. Coincidence? No.

Why is this happening? Here’s where my tinfoil-hat conspiracy theory comes in: because this is the plan. Those fortunate enough to climb into the executive level of a corporation they did not build, have decided that they’re going to keep the extra money themselves. So, the wages for college grads falls, because it can. Why has the GOP fought so relentlessly to stymie every pro-jobs proposal brought before it? To maintain the 8-10% unemployment rate. Why do they want to maintain this high rate? Because high unemployment puts downward pressure on wages. When someone asks for a raise, the corporate response is “you’re lucky to have a job.” Yes, it’s true, and that’s exactly my point.

I get a lot of flack claiming that I’m anti-business, or a pro-union shill, or an alarmist, or lots of other things. And yet, somehow, the actual evidence seems to be on my side. Oh, sure, you can nitpick a few of these points where I’ve overgeneralized and then shout “FAIL” (it’s happened), but I have yet to see a convincing, fact-based contrary argument.

Of course, one prime target is my conspiracy theory, that there is a plan to build in legal support for income inequality. Look, corporate management is a cohesive group. These guys–and it’s 90% men–sit on the boards of each others’ companies. They hang out together in the Hamptons on weekends. They ski in Aspen. The cabal is not nearly as incestuous as the power circle here in RI, but it’s on course for that. The first thing that happens when you get power is you try to make sure you keep power. It’s damn hard to get to the top of the pyramid, so, when you do, you bloody well try to stay there.

Now, if you’re Mitt Romney, and you can borrow untold amounts from your parents, and you’ve been sent to the best schools where you met the Next Generation of Leaders, getting there is a whole lot easier. He claims he got nothing, but that’s just flipping ridiculous. I saw a post showing a copy of a magazine article from like 1967 that listed him among the 25 most eligible bachelors in the nation. Yeah, he had to work really hard. He and GW Bush could call up daddy’s friends and ask for help, for investment money, etc. Real hard. And did you see how Mitt’s original contract at Bain Capital guaranteed him a place in the parent company should the venture fail? A real risk-taker.

Even Adam Smith recognized the collusion of management: “We rarely hear, it has been said, of the combinations of masters, though frequently of those of workmen. But whoever imagines, upon this account, that masters rarely combine, is as ignorant of the world as of the subject.” Wealth of Nations, Part I, Ch VIII

So, yes, the people in power have a vested interest in maintaining their power. And they have the ability to shape circumstances–to some degree–to help them maintain their power. So, conspiracy? That might be a stretch. A plan, perhaps not fully articulated as such? Absolutely.

Gemma’s Jobs Plan Isn’t Right for Rhode Island


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Anthony Gemma

Anthony GemmaIn a world where self-described “leaders” show their “leadership” largely by describing it in press releases, and politicians routinely praise their own bold choices, it is refreshing to see one who actually lives up to his own billing.

Anthony Gemma, on the other hand, has a jobs plan that is indeed as “innovative, strategic, and transparent” as he says. Unfortunately it’s also silly, misguided, and occasionally bizarre. (And hard to find.  Go look on his home page and wait until you see “Enough is enough” and click on that.)

The centerpiece of his plan is to nurture the growth of the “wellness” industry in Rhode Island. This includes businesses who produce dietary supplements and organic foods, as well as “wellness jobs that include personal trainers, aerobics and pilates instructors, managers, researchers, Web site designers, wellness and fitness writers, and dietitians.”

Well all right, then. Maybe it sounds goofy, but could it work?

Sadly, probably not. Here’s a little economics lesson for you. What Rhode Island sorely needs is not goods and services to sell to other Rhode Islanders, but things to sell to the rest of the nation or the rest of the world. Do we currently suffer from a shortage of Pilates instructors?  Are there aerobics classes that can’t run because no instructor can be hired?  If we had more personal trainers could we sell them to people in Kentucky or India?  These are services that are not in short supply, and are really no good for export, either.

Ok, how about the nutritional supplement part of the mix?  This would presumably trade on our lack of strength in this sector. So far as I can tell, as far as nutrition companies go, Rhode Island is home only to Edesia Global Nutrition Solutions, an international effort aimed at distributing nutritional supplements to starving kids. Edesia is a very cool organization, and sells teddy bears to support its mission. Though I can imagine it could be the seed for a thriving food industry here, it’s not exactly what Gemma was talking about. (Read about them here.)

So in other words, Gemma is proposing to grow an industry where what we have can’t be exported and what can be exported, we don’t have. Leveraging assets we don’t have seems an interesting approach to economic development. So you have to award points for originality, in exactly the same way you’d praise the architect who envisions a fountain in the desert before anyone has dug the first well.  Exactly like that.

Bettering that, Gemma proposes that we encourage the Mayo Clinic or Tufts Medical to open wellness clinics here. This, of course, would be the opposite of exporting goods. Instead of bringing money into the state, we’d be sending it away, to Minnesota or Massachusetts to provide services that we can get in-state. This, again, is why success in business means little or nothing about success in making policy to benefit a whole state.

Too late, too little

There’s a section in this plan talking about how higher education should be demand-driven and responsive to the needs of businesses and students. That’s a great idea. So great, it was pretty much incorporated into the “CCRI 21st Century Workforce Commission” report from a couple of years ago. (Gemma also suggests asking the state’s 7 biggest employers for $250,000 apiece to shore up education at CCRI. Which is a funny thought: we can’t raise taxes on businesses, but we can demand contributions from them?)

Along the same lines, there’s a four item list on page 9, that describes what the state should do to encourage the growth of the wellness industry. What’s funny about the list is that the first three items on it — tax credits, loans, assistance finding federal money — are all things the state already does. So yes, these are good ideas. So good that someone already implemented them.

And then there’s this:

“It is incumbent upon us to eliminate the over-regulation of the small businesses which are the engines that drive the Rhode Island economy. I will create a workgroup to review all federal and state regulations that hinder wellness and health-oriented businesses…” [p.8]

This, presumably, would join the Secretary of State’s workgroup, and the legislative commissions and the Governor’s initiatives of years past. Courtesy of the Secretary of State’s office, this work is under way, and it’s hard to find anyone to disagree with the claim.

Honestly, you don’t have to find disagreement to understand why these things — streamlining, increased efficiencies, and so on — often don’t get done. People who crave simple answers will blame unions and fear of change, but it’s pretty easy to find deeper reasons.

In my experience, you can walk around any town hall or state building and find people who agree that there are efficiencies available, but don’t have the resources to re-tool their department’s operations. “Doing more with less” year after year leaves little room for designing new procedures or implenting new systems. When you walk into a tax assessor’s office and find the assessor trying to finish reports that her staff used to prepare, you’ve found someone who can’t afford to research or entertain new possibilities about the conduct of her department’s business. For better and worse, that’s how we run things these days. Studies and commissions are all well and good, but change requires resources, even when the change makes things more efficient. You’ve got to put something in to get more out.

So that’s what I learned by reading the Gemma Jobs plan: he suggests concentrating on a new industry that has approximately zero potential to bring new money into the state, and offers a bunch of other suggestions that are already in place. What’s more, almost all of his plan consists of state policy suggestions, while the last time I checked, he is running for federal office.

There’s plenty more, but I’ve piled on enough.  Ok, sorry, one thing more. I have to share my favorite part. It’s a tax incentive on page 9, for people who get hired in the wellness industry. Seriously. Gemma would offer a tax credit to new employees. Really?  Does he imagine that unemployed people need a tax incentive to help them find jobs? That would be the sound of the fountain designer who has finally been persuaded to help dig a well and shows up to work with a butterfly net.

So sure. Gemma is a smart energetic guy who has done good things in the past, and doubtless will again in the future. I just don’t want a congressman with judgment like this. His jobs plan is certainly “innovative, strategic, and transparent” as he says. But is there no place for “practical,” “sensible,” or “realistic?”

Occupy Prov: Bail Out Workers, Not CEOs


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Note: This was written by Paul Hubbard, Chris Murphy and Jared Paul. It reflects  Occupy Providence’s position on the 38 Studios debacle. The die-in represents the destruction of jobs by trickle-down strategies not the workers who lost their jobs.

CHANTING “MONEY for jobs and a decent wage, not for bailouts and 38,” 75 members and supporters of Occupy Providence (OPVD) rallied and marched through the streets of Providence on June 9.

OPVD organized the protest around three demands: No bailout of Wall Street/38 Studios bondholders, tax the rich, and solidarity not austerity, locally, nationally and internationally.

Assembling outside the Rhode Island Convention Center where the liberal blogger conference Netroots was in progress, the crowd heard personal testimony from working people who described how the economic crises and austerity agenda of the 1 percent have impacted their lives.

OPVD then marched several blocks to the former headquarters of 38 Studios, which spoken-word artist Jared Paul, an organizer with OPVD, described as a “crime scene.” Dozens of marchers then laid on the ground and were outlined in chalk as they participated in the great RI Jobs Dead On Arrival “die-in.” The action was designed to dramatize the destruction of good jobs caused by the “trickle-down” policies of the 1 percent and evidenced by the 38 Studios debacle.

38 Studios, a video game company owned by former Red Sox baseball star Curt Schilling, was financed in 2010 with a $75 million loan from the RI Economic Development Corporation (EDC). Gambling on Schilling’s risky start-up with taxpayer funds, the quasi-public agency floated up to $125 million in “moral obligation” bonds on Wall Street to guarantee the deal.

Chris Mastrangelo, an organizer with OPVD, made the analogy of a gambler who goes “on the street” to a loan shark for money to bet on a horse. Schilling, for many years a right-wing proponent of “small government,” was only too happy to accept the EDC loan.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

NOW THAT 38 Studios has collapsed, laid off its entire workforce in three states (700 people) and filed for bankruptcy, the bondholders (sharks) on Wall Street still expect to be paid. Gov. Lincoln Chafee and the Rhode Island Legislature have promised full payment. This will cost Rhode Island’s taxpayers $112 million over the next 10 to 20 years.

Speaking at the die-in, Paul Hubbard of the International Socialist Organization said:

The austerity agenda of Rhode Island’s 1 percent, recently imposed by the governor and the Rhode Island legislature, means massive cuts to education, the developmentally disabled, state worker pensions, public transportation and Rhode Island’s poor. These are the real crimes, crimes perpetrated against Rhode Island’s working families, against the 99 percent, against humanity…Our sisters and brothers in Greece, Egypt, Spain and Quebec have risen up against the austerity agenda of the global 1 percent. Occupy Providence is proud to stand in solidarity with the global 99 percent.

OPVD then marched through the city of Providence to the State House, where dozens of protesters assembled in front of the building’s main entrance. Chalk outlines of dead bodies, representing another crime scene, were drawn on the plaza outside.

Marching back to the convention center, the site of OPVD’s four-day “sidewalk occupation,” dozens of protesters stopped by another crime scene–the tax-exempt Providence Place Mall. Sixty protesters marched through the first floor, chanting, “Tax the rich! Solidarity not austerity!”

Security guards appeared and began assaulting peaceful protesters at the front of the march, physically pushing them toward the middle exit. A large group of protesters easily avoided the guards and continued to the exit at the far end of the mall as planned. There, a “mic check” ensued as OPVD again started chanting.

Security guards called in the Providence police, who detained and handcuffed about a dozen protesters as they attempted to leave. An hour later, all were released after signing agreements to stay off the mall premises for one year.

OPVD then re-assembled and finished the march, returning to cheers from those at the sidewalk occupation as well as bystanders outside the convention center. Speaking to the media, organizer Mariah Burns said, “The police used handcuffs on peaceful protesters simply exercising their rights to assembly and free speech. These tactics were clearly designed to intimidate and were completely unnecessary.”

As the scandal surrounding 38 Studios continues to unfold, OPVD has pledged to continue its struggle for justice and against Wall Street bailouts.

Spamthony Gemma: A Business Plan for RI

Spamthony Gemma

Greetings! My name is Spamthony Gemma. I’m running for Governor Congress because I have a scheme plan to create 10,000 jobs in Rhode Island. Rhode Island needs more businessmen like me, Mitt Romney, and Don Carcieri to get this state back on track.

Let me take a moment to present you with a business opportunity.

Low risk – High return – Work your own hours!

Now’s your chance to get into the recession proof spamming industry! I’ve been having great success in the spamming industry and I want you to get in on a piece of the action. Here’s how it works!

First, I will stop buying my 500,000+ facebook fans from 3rd party vendors and will begin hiring Rhode Islanders to create fake facebook profiles. You can then use your fake facebook profile(s) to spam your friends about useful things such as plumbing services (hint: toss in a few hundred inspirational quotes and photos). You can even take it to the next level and start spamming blogs like this one!

This is just the ground floor – there’s plenty of room to move on to bigger and better opportunitie$$$. Anyone can take advantage of these emerging trends of the 21st century! I hope you’ll join me so that we can get our state back on track – together.

P.S. Vote for me, Spamthony Gemma!

This is a satirical parody posted by a member of the RI Future community.

Fixing the U.S. Post Office, and Fixing It Good


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
NALC members protesting S1789
NALC members protesting S1789
NALC members protesting S1789 (credit: Ron Augustus)

Headed down Route 2 yesterday and what did I see?  About a hundred men and women in US Postal Service uniforms, demonstrating outside Senator Jack Reed’s office. What’s up?  They are members of the National Association of Letter Carriers, protesting Senate Bill 1789, a plan to “fix” the post office.

As you may have heard, the Post Office is going broke. It is routinely facing multi-billion-dollar shortfalls. What you may not have heard is why it’s going broke. Actually that’s not quite right. If you’ve been paying attention, you’ve undoubtedly heard accounts of how email is breaking the world of paper mail. While there’s a nugget of truth in this, the real facts show that the real story is that it’s mostly bad accounting pulling the Post Office down.

First some facts: the USPS gets no tax money, except a tiny bit used to pay the postage to send audio books to blind people. The rest of its budget is made through sales of postage and other business income. But despite insisting that the Postal Service be run like a business, Congress has put strict limits on what it must and must not do.

Among the limits are a 2006 law that forces the Postal Service to put away far more money to pay for retirements than is necessary. The USPS retirement funds are currently overfunded by about $13 billion. What’s more, the law demands that by 2016 the USPS have enough money socked away to pay retiree health benefits for 75 years. Yes, that’s correct: the Postal Service is going broke today in order to pay medical benefits for retirees who are not yet born. In the last quarter of 2011, the Service spent $3.2 billion more than it took in. This crazy savings plan for retiree health benefits alone cost $3.6 billion. By itself this expense made the difference between profitability and loss.  For the nine months ending last June, the service lost $5.5 billion and $5.9 billion was for retiree health care. (They report everything by quarters.)  Without that expense, the USPS would have made money for the entire year 2011 — the year its cash flow problems became a crisis. For the record, the retiree health care fund now holds $42.5 billion, and is 48% funded at that 75-year horizon. This is approximately enough to pay benefits through 2060, according to my back-of-the-envelope calculations.

NALC members on Route 2 near Jack Reed's office

Obviously retiree health care is part of the employment contract, and should be counted as an operating expense, but that’s not the same as saying that pre-funding 75 years worth of expenses in 10 years is the right way to go. On the contrary, the USPS experience says it is exactly the wrong way.

The Postal Service is not without business challenges. The shift from regular mail to email has taken a big chunk of postage revenue with it, and it’s not likely to come back. But the moaning you may have read about how the USPS can’t make it in an electronic world is mostly uninformed. The fact is that the business operations are covering the costs by most reasonable measures and a few simple changes, like adding some counter services, or offering email, as lots of other countries do, would provide more revenue.

Unfortunately, instead of questioning the decisions of accountants, the USPS managers are bowing to them, and planning to close post offices in 2012, processing facilities in 2013, and end Saturday delivery in 2014, all in order to fund retiree health care in 2091. All these changes will make service slower and less convenient for all of us. The S1789 bill makes this possible.

There is some good in the bill. It does slightly relieve the pre-funding mandate of the retiree health care. But it doesn’t do enough. It also doesn’t allow USPS to use its pension surplus to pay for the retiree health care shortfall. It doesn’t loosen up the crazy restrictions on USPS businesses, like offering notary services, or contracting for delivery services.

So that’s the story: there is trouble afoot in the world of the Post Office, but it’s not a crisis. What makes it a crisis is the absurd accounting rules, and the restrictions on USPS businesses. Please tell Senator Reed to reject this bill and vote for a bill that actually addresses the real problems in a sensible way.

VP Candidate Talks Politics, Race, Music at RIC Friday


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Party for Socialism and LiberationThere is room at every election for new voices – including the ideas of former communists and those of modern-day socialists.  That’s my premise and I’m sticking to it. Well actually, I’m doing more than that this Friday at a panel discussion I’m facilitating at RI College called “Race, Politics and Music: A Look at Rhode 2 Africa and Election Year 2012,” which includes Yari Osorio, the Candidate of Party for Socialism and Liberation.

The panel is part of “Diversity is a Way of L.I.F.E,” which is a statewide conference that happens annually at RIC “to bring together educators, students, artists and community-based activists.”  My session will run on Friday at 4:00 PM in Alger Hall, and Osorio will speak alongside Jim Vincent, President, NAACP Providence Branch and television host of the Jim Vincent Show; Erik Andrade, a spoken word artist and community/youth activist from New Bedford, MA; Talia Whyte, a Boston-based freelance journalist with over ten years experience reporting on social justice, media and technology; and Marco McWilliams, a RI-based educator, activist, lecturer, and published writer (including here on RIFuture.org) who covers the African Diaspora.

The entire conference kicks off at 11:00 AM, and directly following the conference there will be dinner, a poetry open mic, and performances that are part of Bilingual Poetry Festival I organizing at sites across the state.

Below is more information about the panel; updates will also be posted on www.Rhode2Africa.wordpress.com and on Twitter (follow me @rezaclif). Learn more about the conference here on Facebook or register by clicking here.

***

Rhode 2 Africa: Elect the Arts 2012 (R2A 2012), is a documentary and multimedia project being produced with the primary aim of motivating diverse constituencies to vote in November and engage in political conversations at the local, national, and global level.  The project does this through conversations with emerging and established Black musicians, community members and leaders, political experts and scholars, and media professionals – including those involved in or knowledgeable about alternative parties and platforms and underrepresented issues. The exploration of these topics is based on a very simple principle: there is room at every election to hear and examine new voices and ideas, and this year is no different.

Furthermore, as protesters part of Occupy Wall Street, and break-off movements like Women Occupy and Occupy The Hood have demonstrated, citizens across this country have grown tired of never hearing from the variety of voices making up the “99%.” Still, if you pay attention to major news outlets, you would think that the only people engaged and to be targeted for the November elections are the (now) all-white Republican candidates and their party followers. However, one place in which you can hear alternative voices and views on politics is within the music community. Besides being heads of households, tax-payers, insurance-holders, and voters, there are many performers who play at political events, directly and indirectly endorsing candidates; hip hop artists who “rap” about reform and rebellion; and emerging and established artists who’ve performed at The Whitehouse.  R2A Elect the Arts is about sharing the voices of Black and multicultural musicians engaged in this type of work and providing election 2012 coverage and awareness through conversations on race, politics and music.R2A 2012 is currently in-production, but on Friday, April 13 at 4:00 PM, R2A Creator/Producer, Reza Clifton facilitates a panel discussion called “Race, Politics and Music: A Look at Rhode 2 Africa and Election Year 2012.”  In addition to opening the conversation up to the Diversity is a Way of L.I.F.E. statewide conference at Rhode Island College, Clifton will bring in tech/staff to film the discussion and question and answers for inclusion on the documentary.  Attendees who attend and stay for the session are automatically consenting to be recorded and included in the final project.Facilitator:
Reza Clifton, Award-winning writer, multimedia producer and cultural navigator, Creator/Producer of Rhode 2 AfricaConfirmed Panelists:

  • Yari Osorio, Vice Presidential Candidate of the Party for Socialism and Liberation
  • Jim Vincent, President, NAACP Providence Branch and television host
  • Erik Andrade, spoken word artist and community activist from New Bedford, MA
  • Talia Whyte, Boston-based freelance journalist with over ten years experience reporting on social justice, media and technology
  • Marco McWilliams, RI-based educator, activist, lecturer, and published writer who covers the African Diaspora

***

MORE BIOS:

Reza Corinne Clifton is an award-winning writer, producer, digital storyteller and cultural navigator whose work blends and examines music, identity and global consciousness.  She was acknowledged in 2007 and 2009 with Diversity in the Media awards for multimedia projects that she published or launched on her flagship blog, RezaRitesRi.com – including the first Rhode 2 Africa project, which was a four-part interview series and concert series held in Providence. Clifton has also been recognized for written work and direction as health editor a regional women’s magazine and for leadership as a young professional and community organizer in Providence, RI. In 2011 alone, she was named “Most Musical,” a “Trender,” and “Most Soothing Voice” due to her work sharing music and art in the community and on radio – through WRIU and BSR. She remains an active blogger on VenusSings.com, RI Future.org, Rhode2Africa.wordpress.com and on RightHer (a blog from Women’s Fund of Rhode Island) and she sits on the board of Girls Rock! RI, an organization that uses music to empower girls and women in RI.

Yari Osorio is the 2012 vice-presidential candidate of the Party for Socialism and Liberation; he has been a member of the New York City branch of the PSL since 2006.  Born in Cali, Colombia, Osorio immigrated to the United States at age three with his mother and older brother. He is now a U.S. citizen, but grew up undocumented. The harsh anti-immigrant policies in the United States propelled Osorio to become an ardent advocate for social and economic justice, and for equality. Osorio received a BA degree from John Jay CUNY in Forensic Psychology and later became a New York State certified Emergency Medical Technician.  He is an active anti-war and social justice organizer in New York City, and is a volunteer organizer in the anti-war ANSWER Coalition (Act Now to Stop War and End Racism).

Jim Vincent is the President of the the NAACP-Providence, a position he was elected to in December 2010.  Prior to taking on the role of president, Vincent had spent many years serving the organization as Second Vice President, and serving the community in general through his work doing housing and community development in Rhode Island and Massachusetts. In particular, he has worked since March 1998 as the Manager of Constituent Advocacy for Rhode Island Housing, where he provides outreach and technical assistance to underserved communities among other duties.  Vincent has also served on many boards throughout RI that serve the state’s African American, Cape Verdean, and Hispanic communities, and is a former President of the Urban League of Rhode Island.  He may be best known for his role as the Producer and Host of the award winning, Jim Vincent Show .

Erik Andrade is a spoken word artist and community activist from New Bedford, MA who is featured in Rhode 2 Africa: Elect the Arts 2012.  He works with New Bedford youth through People Acting in Community Endeavor (PACE) YouthBuild New Bedford and as co-facilitator of the organization’s Sustainability, Leadership Development and Social Justice Workshops. Andrade is also a founding member of La Soul Renaissance, a local spoken word and hip hop venue which focuses on social justice issues and spirituality, and of the Overflowing Cup Project – an artist circle that works to encourage, recover and inspire creativity through a collective process. Andrade recently ran for the New Bedford School Committee, hoping to bring the voice of at-risk youth to the committee and to issue a call for systematic reform.

Talia Whyte is a freelance journalist who has reported on issues related to social justice, media and technology for over 10 years.  Her work can be found in the Houston Chronicle, The Progressive, theGrio.com, The Boston Globe, MSNBC, PBS, and Al Jazeera, among many other publications and sites.  She is also a leader within Global Wire Associates, a new media consulting firm that promotes innovative communication for advancing social justice.  Whyte is co-author of “Digital Activism Decoded: The New Mechanics of Change.”

Marco McWilliams is a Pan-Africanist intellectual, published writer, and lecturer whose ideas can currently be read at Voxuion.com and RIfuture.org. McWilliams is also an adult literacy instructor for Amos House and English for Action, two organizations based in Providence, RI. As founder of the Providence Africana Reading Collective, McWilliams is known for his rigorous scholarship on social justice and for creating a “progressive learning community dedicated to the interruption of normative narratives of oppression through a critical examination of the emancipatory thought chronicled in the canons of Africana literature.” He will pursue a Ph.D. beginning in 2013.

Obama tax plan clamps down on private equity

Reviewing reports of last week, I see that buried in the details of President Obama’s corporate tax reform proposal is a rare gem. To be clear, the overall package — basically a reduction of the nominal tax rate in exchange for giving up some of the more egregious loopholes — seems an ok deal. But there is a piece of idiocy in the corporate tax code that hasn’t been addressed seriously since Jimmy Carter failed to get it fixed in 1977. This is the tax advantage of debt over equity.

This sounds dull, but it has a story behind it that is far more revealing about “private equity” than any of the blather you’ve already read about Mitt Romney and Bain Capital.

Imagine, for a moment, Company A with a million dollars in profit and a hundred thousand investors, each of whom paid a hundred dollars for a share. The company takes that million, pays taxes on it, and distributes the remainder to the investors. Say they pay 10% of their profits in taxes (what’s left of the 35% rate, after all the loopholes, and not an unusual number). If the company distributes all its profit as dividends, each shareholder gets $9, a 9% annual return on their investment, which isn’t bad at all.

Now imagine a Company B that also earned a million dollars more than they spent. This one has a hundred thousand bondholders, each of whom loaned the company $100 at 10% annual interest. The company sends $10 to each bondholder, and so reports zero profit, thus zero taxes. The shareholders in B?  Who cares about them?

The structure of these two is pretty much the same: both companies sell their products, pay their expenses, and then distribute the money left over. But one calls those distribution payments “dividends” and the other calls them “debt service” and so the first company pays taxes, and the second does not.

What happens if the economy declines?  Company A will simply send out less money in dividends. Company B will go bankrupt if it can’t meet its debt payments.

Clear enough?  Now imagine some private equity vultures, I mean investors, notice that Company A has built up cash reserves of $10 million. They borrow $50 million to purchase Company A, which is now on the hook for $2.5 million per year. Since they’re only earning a million a year, they have to pay part of that debt service from their reserves, but they can do that for a few years. Also, they get to book a loss, which means they can ask the IRS to refund the taxes they paid for the previous two years. And since they can’t get enough back to make a profit, it’s very unlikely they will pay any taxes at all for a long time to come. They used to pay $100,000 in taxes every year, so over the life of the losses they’ll incur, taxpayers will subsidize the deal to the tune of over $2 million.

This is the point that lots of people don’t understand, or refuse to understand, about “private equity.”  They way those outfits make money is usually by using the tax rules to their advantage, not by increasing corporate efficiency or streamlining processes. A company with exploitable assets could be one with an underutilized factory or intellectual property, but it’s more likely just to be one that has cash in reserve or that paid a big tax bill in the last couple of years. “Assets” like these are much more easily quantified than property and you can estimate them via public documents, something you can’t do with factory outputs or licensing fees.

In other words, that wave of leveraged buyouts that began in the 1980s and ended — well it hasn’t really ended — was largely subsidized by you and me. When RJR Nabisco was bought in 1989 for $21 billion, taxpayers ultimately paid more than $5 billion to the purchasers. This was not the free market at work, it was the tax code encouraging buccaneers like the folks at KKR, Michael Milken, and Ivan Boesky, along with Mitt Romney and Bain Capital. Without the tax advantage of debt over equity, very few of those leveraged buyouts could ever have happened.

Jimmy Carter’s economic team recognized the risk to American manufacturing represented by the tax preference for debt over equity, and addressing it was a central piece of his proposed 1977 overhaul of the tax code. But the change was opposed by business, and he dropped it. Ronald Reagan’s administration made a half-hearted attempt to fix it in 1984, but it went nowhere. Dan Rostenkowski, the longtime head of the House Ways and Means Committee, worked on a proposal in 1987, but it also died. George Bush, Sr., airily said, “I have no agenda on that. I’m always a little wary about the government trying to solve problems when, historically, the marketplace has been able to solve them,” and declined to do anything about the issue. Bill Clinton’s 1995 tax proposals contained a provision addressing the issue, but these were presented during the government shut down episode and did not make it into the final bill resolving that debacle.

So far as I know, that’s the last time there was a proposal on the congressional table to address what has been one of the most destructive tax policies on record. Over the past 30 years, our leaders, with only a few exceptions, have stood by as big finance has devastated our manufacturing sector, laid off hundreds of thousands of people, and done away with their well-paid jobs — and you and I paid for it. I know President Obama’s corporate tax proposal isn’t going to become law in this Congress, but fixing the tax code to eliminate the subsidy for leveraged corporate takeovers is important, and I’m glad someone has put it forward — again.

 

TOMORROW: 5th Annual Budget Rhode Map Conference


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Register now for The Poverty Institute‘s 5th Annual Budget Rhode Map Conference “From Poverty to Progress” to hear from leading experts about the economic vitality of Rhode Island and its residents.

Thursday, February 16, 2012

8:30 am: Registration and Continental Breakfast
9:00 am – 12:30 pm: Conference
Rhodes on the Pawtuxet
60 Rhodes Place, Cranston, RI 02905

$35 per person

Featuring keynote speaker Jared Bernstein 

Senior Fellow, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

Former Chief Economist and Economic Advisor to Vice President Biden and member of President Obama’s economic team.

Additional Presentations Include: 

A Skilled Workforce: Meeting the Demands of the Innovation Economy

  • Julian L. Alssid, Executive Director, Workforce Strategies Center
  • Rick Brooks, Executive Director, Governor’s Workforce Board
  • Keith Stokes, Executive Director, RI Economic Development Corporation
  • Adriana Dawson, State Director, RI Small Business Development Center

Rhode Island’s Human Service Budget: The Story Behind the Headlines

  • Elena Nicolella, Rhode Island Medicaid Director
  • Linda Katz, Policy Director, The Poverty Institute

 

Fighting for Rhode Island


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

The last few years have been tough for our great Ocean State. Across Rhode Island, I’ve organized community dinners, main street tours, and coffee hours where I’ve heard firsthand from so many people struggling to find work, seniors worried about their Social Security and Medicare, families being crushed by unfair credit card rates, and students scared they are going to have to leave college because they can’t afford tuition. People are hurting and they are frustrated, but they aren’t giving up, and neither am I. I’ve listened and I’ve brought these stories with me to Washington, and it is my promise to you as your U.S. Senator that I will keep fighting to create jobs, protect essential benefits like Social Security and Medicare, and provide our kids with a brighter future.

OUR VOICE IN WASHINGTON                                        

Rhode Islanders sent Sheldon to the Senate to fight for us and against the big special interests – and that’s just what he has done. We know that we can count on Sheldon to support our priorities – creating jobs, protecting families, and ending special deals for billionaires and big corporations. Sheldon has led the fight against moves to severely cut Social Security, Medicare benefits, and Pell Grants because he knows how much we in Rhode Island count on these programs.  And he has opposed giving more tax breaks to billionaires and multinational corporations while middle class families continue to suffer.

SHELDON’S PLAN

Putting Rhode Islanders Back to WorkSheldon has fought hard for legislation to create jobs, support small businesses, and revitalize our manufacturing sector.

  • Sheldon introduced legislation that would meet President Obama’s call in his State of the Union speech to eliminate the tax loopholes that reward companies who ship US jobs overseas.
  • Sheldon helped pass a Senate bill to crack down on China’s currency manipulation that costs American jobs by making it more expensive for us to sell goods to China, and cheaper for China to sell things here.
  • Sheldon is supporting legislation that could fund significant transportation improvements, such as repairing the I-95 viaduct in Providence, and provide new construction jobs in Rhode Island.
  • Sheldon has proposed a measure to provide tax credits to small businesses who hire unemployed workers to make it easier for a business to add new jobs.

Protecting Medicare and Social Security for Rhode Island Seniors. Sheldon will always be committed to preserving Social Security and Medicare benefits, and will continue fighting to reduce the cost of prescription drugs for seniors.

  • When Republicans in the House passed dangerous legislation to end Medicare as we know it, Sheldon helped lead the fight against that bill in the Senate.
  • Sheldon helped ensure that the health care reform bill closed the “doughnut hole” for prescription drugs covered under Medicare. More than 10,000 Rhode Island seniors benefited from this discount in 2011, saving $5.5 million dollars.
  • When budget negotiators threatened to pass new cuts to Social Security to reduce the deficit, Sheldon stepped up to protect that vital program and helped form the Senate’s Defend Social Security Caucus.

Getting a Straight Deal for Middle Class FamiliesSheldon has heard from so many Rhode Islanders who are frustrated with the special deals enjoyed by big corporations and billionaires.  He shares that frustration and is working to restore the “straight deal” that middle class Americans expect and deserve – ending tax giveaways to Big Oil, combating unfair credit card interest rates, making sure millionaires and billionaires pay their fair share in taxes, and putting a stop to unlimited and anonymous spending by big corporations in our elections.

Supporting Education Providing our children with a good education is the most important thing we can do to give them the opportunity to get the best jobs in the future.

  • Sheldon is fighting to protect Pell Grants to make it easier for students to afford college. In 2009-2010, 19,937 Rhode Islanders received $69,567,944 in Pell Grants for an average of $3,489 per student.
  • Sheldon has been working to extend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act to improve our nation’s middle schools by establishing a grant program to help fund reforms in struggling school systems.

Protecting our Environment and Coastal Economy.  In Rhode Island, the strength of our economy is strongly tied to the health of our environment.  Sheldon recognizes this, and is leading several bipartisan efforts to better protect our oceans and coasts – and the jobs they support.  He’s working with Senator Snowe (R-ME) to establish a National Endowment for the Oceans, collaborating with Senator Vitter (R-LA) to re-authorize the National Estuary Program, and is co-chairing the Senate Oceans Caucus with Senator Murkowski (R-AK).  Sheldon will continue fighting to advance these priorities in 2012.

Stay in Touch: whitehouse.senate.gov, facebook.com/SenatorWhitehouse, twitter.com/SenWhitehouse

Hard Talk About an Ugly Economy

Job Sector Contribution to the RI EconomyAfter several months of more-or-less positive jobs numbers in RI, the last two months have been anything but. And the December numbers were, frankly, horrific. While it is certainly true that a wonk could parse [spin] the recent down-turn toward neutral, the same could be done with the previous up-cycle.

As the wonk that could do either, let me tell you this: the jobs scene in RI is bad. Damn bad. Later, I’ll parse these numbers to show how bad things really are.

Unlike my usual polemics, I’m not going to rant as if there were some obvious course of action on which pols are unwilling to act [even though that’s been true for decades]. At this point, I don’t have a lot of answers, just one brutal, ugly question: where do we go from here?

So, enough with the introductory niceties; let’s have at.

RI’s Jobs Numbers Since the Economic Collapse

Before we can talk about our numbers since the collapse, we need to appreciate that the mid-00’s were the best economic times RI had seen in decades. Of the main jobs indicators, all of them – labor force, employment and unemployment – topped out in 2006/2007. Being the Biggest Little, we need to accept that we largely rise and fall on the national trend. Or at least, we rise on it.

The lead graphic shows how most industrial sectors were basically flat 2001 to 2008 with these notable exceptions: education and health care exploded while manufacturing continued its decades-long collapse. [Source: BLS]

Ed/Health has held its gains since the collapse while professional services and hospitality, which showed solid gains to 2008, have only modest declines since. Construction, not surprisingly, along with government employment, financial services and trades, transportation and utilities (TTU) have sloped off badly.

It’s important to note that I haven’t parsed the contribution of construction in RI relative to other states, but given the collapse of manufacturing, it is at best a secondary impediment.

Long story short: our problems today are the same as our problems 20 years ago – manufacturing is dying, and we have not yet found a way to replace those jobs.

The Recent Horrors

For most of this year, we followed or even amplified the national trend downward until October, when we hit some kind of top and turned counter-trend. In the fourth quarter of 2011, we diverged almost a full percentage point from the national average.

That, my friends, is some ugly shit.

Granted, I could spin these declines toward neutral, but just as easily could I spin the gains toward neutral. The gains were mostly declines in the labor force – that is, people who say they’re looking for jobs – while the declines were gains in the same.

Long story short: we’re not creating jobs, we’re treading water. People dropped out and then dropped in again.

I probably should have mentioned that we need to create 40,000 jobs to get back to “full employment”. 40,000 jobs on a basis of just over 500,000 employed means 1 new job for every 12.5 that currently exist. It’s a giant number.

But wait…it gets worse.

The Current Situation

Look at this jobs board. Plenty jobs listed, for a certain kind of worker. These are all full-time jobs, and they are recent listings. Even ones from months ago may still be unfilled. This state lacks highly educated workers. In fact, we lack moderately educated workers – we import welders. Not Ruby on Rails developers – welders!

That’s the situation. RI’s historic under-investment in education has yielded a work force ill-prepared to face the current economy, much less the emerging one. [See above under collapse of manufacturing sector.]

To be sure, if you drive an automobile on an elevated highway, it’s important that welders that construct the steel-on-steel joints that support the reinforced concrete substrates that hold the gloriously smooth asphalt on which you drive understand the operational parameters of joint strength relative to weld length and depth as that applies to steel grade and thickness.

“Welder” does not equal “ignoramus”. If it did, you’d be dead. [If welder had ever equaled ignoramus, he or she would be dead. Welding is, you know, dangerous. Go pick up a torch some time…]

So we need a range of workers, and we import some of them from India or Slovakia or Colombia. Meanwhile, we export highly educated workers to such remote locations as Massachusetts.

But none of that does Jack Squat for our unemployment numbers. Why? Sadly, that answer is all too simple.

Our Prospects

Long ago on a blog far, far away, I wrote a post called “Our Prospects for Economic Growth”. And that post was just as cheery as this one. The cold, hard fact is that the RI’s unemployed are poorly suited to those scant jobs our economy is creating.

This state’s historic disinvestment in education has created a self-reinforcing feedback loop in which jobs exist for imports, and local don’t get jobs. I call this phenomenon “government at war with its population”. If you don’t have an advanced degree, they want you to go away…to some other place where people like you live. While the cities of Pawtucket and Woonsocket (and the ex-government of Central Falls) exemplify this trend, the RI state government proves it out, as well.

To the long-term denizens of the State House, “welder” – challenging as that job might be – is not good enough for them. They want you to have an advanced degree in micro-biology, computer science or (choir of angels) business management before they’ll say you’re RI material. [Note: Financial Services is among the employment sectors that collapsed, much to Smithfield’s chagrin regarding the enormously expensive and now only partially occupied Fidelity campus.]

Except this: RI has an unemployment rate of 10.8% as of this writing, and those people lack substantial education. What’s to do?

Non-Snarky, Future-Oriented Discussion

This state needs to recognize the fact that we’ve got a serious problem, and it’s not going to fix itself. It requires action – immediate, meaningful action. Here are some things I think we can look to create some jobs at the lower end of the wage/education scale.

Get our heads around the “1099 economy” – Having been self-employed for about a decade, I know that it doesn’t really matter if you have “a job” so long as you have “work”. But the deck is stacked badly against the 1099-ers. From health insurance to FICA, you pay a serious penalty when you try to strike out on your own. The Powers that Be have only recently become aware that there is such a thing as the 1099 economy, so they’re still getting up to speed on what it means and how they can help move it forward. Recent changes to the RI EDC Board of Directors certainly help, but they need to be far more aggressive about making this happen.

Fulfill our “Arts and Entertainment” Promise with a Downcity Casino – Like it or not, Providence is known as a party town, and we should build that out for all it’s worth. Despite all it’s challenges and downsides, I think it’s possible for us to “do a casino right” so that we get maximum benefits. And we should go the whole hog, including the postage. We should take a serious look at developing looser rules around the vice trades in which government oversight and monitoring keeps the criminal element at bay. In simple terms, we take a more Cuban or Dutch approach to the sex trades where pimps are replaced by health services.

Sell “War-on-Joblessness” Bonds that Fund Infrastructure – The same way the US sold War Bonds in the 2oth century, we sell bonds to fund the infrastructure critical to a thriving economy. Because we’re not auctioning bonds on the market but selling them directly, we can set the interest rate where ever we want it. The payoff for investors is more moral than financial. Crazy-talk, I know, but it could happen.

Take Another Look at “Dirty” Industries – The new metals recycling operation on Allens Ave is the kind of “working waterfront” thing we would do well to expand on. Garbage is big business, and it’s the kind of unglamorous industry that nobody goes after. Like the casino, it’s disastrous if done wrong, but brilliant if done right. I’m actually a connoisseur of dumps, so I’ve visited or read about some very advanced operations.

What else? My ideas aren’t the only possibilities. But whatever we talk about doing, it has to focus right down on the kind of jobs we need, not the kind of jobs we want.

AT&T/T-Mobile Merger is about jobs. What’s wrong with that?

Last week, the pretend defenders of private sector unions on Fountain Street bought the line that the AT&T/T-Mobile merger was a bad idea. Typical double speak.  Here is a good counter argument from the Communication Workers of America:

If you repeat a made-up falsehood over and over again, will reasonable people start to believe it?

That’s what the critics of the AT&T/T-Mobile merger are hoping. They’ve manufactured a fact, claiming that the AT&T/T-Mobile merger will lead to 20,000 layoffs of T-Mobile workers. The problem is: they are just plain wrong. The proposed AT&T/T-Mobile merger is good for workers and good for job creation.

Certainly, with unemployment hovering at a stubborn 9 percent, the impact of the proposed merger on jobs today and in the future should be a top concern of policymakers.

Let’s look at the so-called evidence the critics put forward.

Continue reading “AT&T/T-Mobile Merger is about jobs. What’s wrong with that?”

Make Serious Investments to Create Good Paying Jobs for Rhode Islanders

Dear Mr. President:
Over recent weeks I have visited Main Street small businesses and toured manufacturing facilities throughout Rhode Island’s First Congressional District. I have met with jewelry makers, boat builders, and creators of cutting edge medical devices and aeronautical components, and heard from restaurant owners, small textile retailers, and information technology start-ups. Across this diverse array of interests I hear one common and constant concern – in order to survive, prosper, and grow, entrepreneurs and seasoned small business owners alike need consumers, and those consumers need jobs.

Since becoming a member of Congress, I have hosted Town Hall and Tele-town Hall Meetings in communities across my District in an effort to hear directly from constituents. With unemployment in my state and across the country at unacceptably high levels, we must heed concerns from Main Street and the families we serve. In light of recent Congressional Budget Office projections that forecast slow economic and job growth, and in advance of your announcement outlining recommendations to spur job creation, I would like to take this opportunity to share the views of constituents in Rhode Island’s First Congressional District and some of my thoughts on this critical matter.

Rhode Island was the first state in the northeast to enter the recession three years ago, and at 10.8%, our unemployment rate continues to be among the nation’s highest. As you have consistently expressed, our government must set priorities, cut what does not work or is not needed, and make the investments that will create jobs, sustain our economy today and into the future, and ensure our ability to compete in the world.

Nationally, the manufacturing sector has been a bright spot even during these trying economic times. If this vital economic engine is to be sustained, we must continue our investments in programs that help manufacturers compete in a global economy, retool to be more efficient and effective businesses, and retrain the workforce so that skill sets utilized in declining sectors can be transferred to those that are expanding. This is the driving force behind my Make It In America Block Grant legislation and a number of common sense, job- creating bills that have been introduced in the 112th Congress to strengthen and modernize our nation’s manufacturing industry. I strongly encourage your Administration to carefully consider these proposals that will help bolster research and development, expand advanced manufacturing capabilities, and level the playing field with our foreign competitors.

If we are going to strengthen our manufacturing capabilities and make new products here at home, then we must have the ability to execute the timely and effective transport of goods, people, and ideas. This work will require significant investments, both public and private, in our nation’s infrastructure. A critically important first step in this effort is the passage of a robust surface transportation reauthorization.

Building and repairing our nation’s highways, roads, and bridges now is not only a surefire job-creating strategy, this important infrastructure work also helps advance the broader economy, enhances the safety of our citizens, and is a far more cost-effective investment today than it will be in the years ahead. Without a doubt, we must work collectively to rein in our nation’s debt. However, numerous studies, such as the Infrastructure Report Card from the American Society of Civil Engineers, clearly demonstrate that we cannot be responsible stewards of our nation’s finances if we continue to allow the price-tag for infrastructure improvements to escalate with each passing year.

This vital work also extends beyond roads and bridges, and includes our nation’s water systems, ports, schools, public parks and facilities, power grids, and telecommunications. The nearly 14 million unemployed Americans, more than 61,000 of which reside in Rhode Island, demand bold action from their government. When our nation endured the economic strains of the Great Depression, it was bold action in the form of the Works Progress Administration, the Civilian Conservation Corps, and the Public Works Administration that helped put Americans back to work, building and repairing our nation’s infrastructure.

While labor and financial market conditions in the 1930s may have been vastly different than today, what remains the same is the underlying notion that a robust investment in rebuilding our nation’s roads, bridges, and schools will generate job growth and enhance our ability to compete in the global economy. Investing today in building and restoring our nation’s infrastructure is not only smart job-creating policy, it is also smart fiscal policy – as continued deferred maintenance drives the future costs of repairs higher and higher. I strongly urge that your recommendations for job creation include a range of options that encourages both public and private investment in this important work – including the creation of an infrastructure bank and enhanced, innovative, and effective funding opportunities for states, cities, and towns that will put people back to work on priority infrastructure projects.

At the same time, we must recognize that a comprehensive proposal to create and sustain jobs in America must include initiatives that support workforce training and small businesses. Job growth today and into the future, especially for our nation’s manufacturing and construction sectors, requires enhanced support for effective on-the-job training programs, and greater collaboration between our elementary and secondary schools, higher education institutions, and employers in developing multiple career pathways for young adults and improving the skills of unemployed and underemployed Americans. Furthermore, as a member of the Committee on Small Business, I strongly encourage your continued efforts to expand small business access to capital, the lifeblood of small start-ups and longstanding businesses alike. The more than 95,000 small businesses in Rhode Island make up 96% of the state’s employers. They have endured the brunt of our nation’s economic downturn, and our country’s full and sustained economic recovery requires that small businesses have access to the resources that will allow them to form, grow, and prosper.

As the debt ceiling debate underscored, there is strong disagreement about the best approaches and the appropriate role for government in creating jobs. There is no shortage of ideas on how to put people back to work and spur economic growth in the near-term. But, the time for bold action is now. On behalf of my constituents in Rhode Island’s First Congressional District, I thank you for this opportunity to give voice to the small businesses, manufacturers, builders, and unemployed as you prepare your proposals. I look forward to hearing your recommendations, and working to find common ground across the aisle and between levels of government to help put Americans back to work.

Sincerely,

David N. Cicilline

Member of Congress