New computer system at DHS hurts clients and social workers


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Melba Depeña Affigne
Melba Depeña Affigne

Melba Depeña Affigne, director of the RI Department of Human Services (DHS), was “surprised to hear [that clients] did not get service” at the Woonsocket DHS offices. The clients in question were referred from the Woonsocket offices to the DHS offices in Pawtucket, a four hour round trip by bus.

Michael DiBiase, director of the RI Department of Administration said, regarding the problems at the Woonsocket branch of the DHS that the “break in service was unfortunate” and will last “hopefully less than a month.”

DiBiase and Affigne were holding a press conference to explain the layoff of 70 DHS employees, mostly social workers, as part a major reorganization of the DHS and the launching of a new computerized eligibility system that is projected to save taxpayers millions.

Michael DiBiase
Michael DiBiase

The laid off social workers, said DiBiase, will have a chance to apply for one of the more than fifty job openings at DCYF (Department of Children, Youth and Families). The layoffs are required, said Affigne, because of a “new staffing model” that will allow DHS to make significant cuts. The new model is “task based” and will not require supervisors trained in social work to manage by “case load.”

I asked Sue Pearlmutter, dean of the Rhode Island College School of Social Work if this means that the DHS is moving away from social workers advocating on behalf of clients and towards data entry technicians assisting clients using the computers.

“That has been my impression,” said Pearlmutter. The DHS is moving towards “a very different kind of process. Social workers engage with the client and work with the client.” The application process DHS is instituting makes “people take responsibility for their application at a kiosk or in a library.”

Often, these are “people in crisis” at a time when “completing an application is a daunting process.” Some adults and young adults, says Pearlmutter, “may find the process overwhelming. Removing a level of staff may cause more problems for people facing crisis.”

2016-08-25 DHS layoffs 003As for the staff DHS is cutting, saying that there are openings at DCYF is disingenuous. Many of the staff losing their positions at DHS started at DCYF, said Pearlmutter. They took jobs at DHS “because the work at DCYF is so crisis oriented. It’s difficult and emotional work that many found they couldn’t do any more.”

Talking about the jobs at DCYF as being like the work at DHS “shows no understanding of the kind of work social work is,” says Pearlmutter.

The new computer system, which has no official name, it’s just the “New Integrated Eligibility System,” said Affigne, was supposed to be online in July, and is now slated to be operational in mid September. The system will reduce the amount of time prospective clients will spend with social workers. This is “by far the largest technology project that has ever been undertaken by the State of Rhode Island,” said DiBiase.

The new computer system, said Affigne, is an “incredible tool for our workforce” that will “enhance customer service.”

Lucie Burdick, president of Local 580 of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), disagrees. She told RI Future that “this extremely expensive computer system, if it even works correctly someday, will never provide the quality of service a trained, educated, experienced human being provides. The computer pilot program is failing miserably at this point and costs are rising rapidly. It could have been done better and cheaper. The displacement of staff and the cost of human suffering that it has exacted on the population we serve is unconscionable.

“This fiasco is the 38 Studios of human services. The taxpayers and advocates for the poor should be outraged.”

DHS provides people in need with access to many services such as Medicaid, SNAP benefits, Rhode Island Works (RIW), Child Care Assistance Program (CCAP), LTSS, General Public Assistance (GPA) and access to various energy assistance programs like HEAP, WAP and HSR. Affigne said that about one in five Rhode Islanders use services offered at the DHS, and that they maintain six field offices, like the one in Woonsocket.

“What will be the impact on clients?” I asked.

Affigne replied, “There will be no impact on clients.”

Yet existing clients did not start receiving notifications of reduced services in Woonsocket until August 23, and the Woonsocket DHS began reduced services on the 19th. That’s two or thee days of people arriving at the Woonsocket offices and learning that they were in for a four hour bus ride to Pawtucket from a sign taped to the door.

As Bob Plain and I tried to ask questions to get to the heart of the issue of the actual impact that this transition will have on people trying to access needed state services, Kristin Gourlay, health care reporter for RIPR cut in.

“Presumably,” said Gourlay, “in September, when the system goes live, people won’t have to go to a field office, they can go to- if the have a computer at home they can use that, they could go to a public library and use a computer there or another social service agency…”

“Correct,” said Affigne.

This allowed DiBiase and Affigne to shrug off concerns about social workers and clients as mere “bumps” along the way towards an improved, (read: cheaper) system. Yet, at a time when poverty and income inequality are at all time highs, and the economy of Rhode Island is barely improving, “bumps” in the lives of the one in five Rhode Islanders applying for needed assistance can be catastrophic.

Here’s the video of RIFuture’s questions:

Here’s the video of the full press conference:

 

Brett Smiley, Lorne Adrain, Scott MacKay and Russ Moore


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

smiley9thgradeWhen Lorne Adrain dropped out of the Providence mayor’s race, he was largely lauded. When Brett Smiley dropped out, he was largely lambasted.

“Adrain took the high road,” RIPR’s Scott MacKay wrote in a post dated July 17, “saying he got out to make it more difficult for the next mayor to win election only a third of the vote or less. He didn’t mention the name Buddy Cianci, but it was clear that Adrain got out to  make it more difficult for Cianci to march back into the Beaux-Arts City Hall in reprise of his improbable 1990 comeback.”

MacKay didn’t seem to think Smiley took that same high road when he dropped out on Friday.

Smiley, MacKay said, “tried to put the usual political spin on full cycle. He said he was leaving the race for the greater good of the city and to stop the Buddy Cianci vindication campaign. Smiley hammered away at both Solomon and Cianci, calling them ‘old-time politicians’ and insisting that Elorza has the best chance of winning a general election over Cianci.”

Then there’s GoLocalProv writer Russ Moore, who was – if nothing else – consistent in his bashing of both Adrain and Smiley for dropping out.

This must prove that Moore is being intellectually honest with his readers and MacKay isn’t, right? Welcome to the strange house of mirrors that is politic debate, where little is ever as it seems on the surface.

I guess it’s like someone once wrote: “One person’s backroom deal is another person’s noble gesture.”

Lt. Gov. candidate Frank Ferri: ‘I would support $15’ for hotel workers


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Frank Ferri and his husband, Anthony Caparco
Frank Ferri (w/bow tie) and his husband, Anthony Caparco

Candidate for Lt. Governor, Representative Frank Ferri, in conversation with Ian Donnis and Scott McKay on RIPR this morning, became the first candidate for statewide office to publicly declare his support for the workers presently engaged with the Providence City Council to pass a $15 minimum wage for all hotel employees in the city.

First asked sked if the minimum wage should be raised, Ferri said, “I believe the minimum wage should be raised. I’m a small business person, I pay more than the minimum wage. We’re in such income inequity right now that I have no problem with raising it.”

McKay then asked Ferri where the minimum wage should be set, and Donnis asked if he supported the $15 minimum wage proposed by Providence hotel workers. Ferri replied, “I support raising the minimum wage. Where that should be right now? There’s a proposal at the Senate for $9, I’ll support that. I’ve traveled a lot. I’ve seen hotel workers. I know how hard they work and to say that they’re not making $15 an hour… I don’t like that. I think that it should be higher.”

When Donnis asked Ferri to clarify, Ferri said, “I would support $15” for hotel workers in Providence.

This is a game changer. No other candidate for statewide office has made such a bold and progressive declaration in support of these workers. Outside of some members of the Providence City Council, I don’t believe there has been any support from elected officials.

Ferri should find his support of the hotel workers a boost to his campaign. In Providence, an “overwhelming 64% support the $15 minimum wage for hotel workers,” according to a recent poll. In this time of rising economic inequality, measures that bring relief and decent living wages to working families are going to become increasingly popular. Let’s face it, restructuring the estate tax isn’t doing many of us any good, and in truth, merely increases the tax burden on all of us.

The advocacy and work of Frank Ferri was critical in passing marriage equality in Rhode Island last year, and his solid stand on progressive issues has set him apart from his rather dull and predictable opponents, Cumberland Mayor Dan McKee and Secretary of State Ralph Mollis. It should be an interesting primary, as both Mollis and McKee have been in the race for a while and have a fundraising advantage, but Frank Ferri has the support of Rhode Islanders statewide eager to support this progressive champion.

You know what? I’m just going to come right out and say it: Frank Ferri should be our next Lt. Governor. I’m voting for him, you should too. Donate time and money to his campaign. Tell your friends to vote for him. This is our chance to advocate for a real, tried and true progressive for statewide office. Let’s make this happen.

Huge Win: Gordon Fox Reverses on Voter ID!


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
George Nee and Gordon Fox get reacquainted with each other on election night. (Photo by Bob Plain)
George Nee and Gordon Fox get reacquainted with each other on election night. (Photo by Bob Plain)

Gordon Fox, the conservative Speaker of the Rhode Island House of Representatives, sent shock waves through the Democratic Party when he got a voter ID law passed.  Ignoring a plea from the Chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee, Fox created a publicity nightmare for the Democrats and a beloved talking point for the right.  That is why it is so critical that he’s now reversed his position, according to reporting from Ian Donnis of NPR.  This is a huge win for the Rhode Island left!

I want to thank the more than 1,800 concerned citizens who signed our petition to repeal the law.  I want to thank Jim Vincent and the NAACP for their tireless work fighting to restore voting rights.  I want to thank the new Providence DSA chapter, which made repealing voter ID their top priority.  But most of all, I want to thank every member of Fox’s liberal district who called him to ask him to change his position.  When DSA and the Progressive Democrats canvassed Fox’s district to pressure him to change his position, I was overwhelmed by the response we got on the doors.  People really understood the issue, they were furious about it, and they made their voices heard.  This victory belongs to them.

Experienced observers of the state house will note that Fox routinely blocks legislation he publicly supports.  In 2013, although he endorsed an assault weapons ban, he still denied it a vote, effectively killing the extremely popular bill and earning himself some glowing praise from Tea Party Representative Doreen Costa.  (I personally suspect the thousands of dollars he took from the NRA might have had something to do with it.)

During the 2012 election, he promised to introduce a sunset to the voter ID law.  In 2013, not only did he break that promise, but he actually tried to tighten the law even further.  By keeping the amended version of the repeal bill secret until right before the House Judiciary Committee voted on it, Fox tricked the pro-voting members of the committee into voting for a bill that would allow even fewer IDs to be accepted at the polls in 2014.  Fortunately, Representative Larry Valencia, who sponsored the bill, was able to pull it before it reached the floor.

So we will still have a huge fight ahead of us.  But Fox’s reversal means we might just win this battle.

Ken Block: Why Progressive RI Should Agree With Me


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Ken Block

Ken BlockWhile I might not agree with where Ken Block invests his energy and determination, I certainly have a lot of respect for his energy and determination. Even after I compared him to PT Barnum and likened his SNAP fraud investigation to Anthony Gemma’s voter fraud investigation, he still took the time to write an essay for RI Future on why progressives should support his efforts.

But either before or after reading Ken’s thoughts, please read my editor’s note at the bottom of his piece, and Sam Howard’s excellent analysis about how and what we communicate about those who live in poverty.

Here’s Ken’s piece:

There are two fundamental truths when it comes to social service spending programs—1) even now, these government assistance programs are not fully meeting the needs of low-income Americans and 2) there will always be people who say the government spends too much on these efforts.

The recent Washington Post story highlighting the effect of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) on the residents of Woonsocket was a powerful reminder not only of the impact of the program, but how it is leaves people struggling to make those benefits last.

The issue of targeting waste and fraud in these programs is one that makes some in the progressive community uncomfortable, because they fear that highlighting real-world abuses of welfare programs will give fodder to the forces that want to eliminate them. But let’s be honest: no degree of welfare reform, not even the most effective effort to stop waste and fraud in the system, will be enough to silence those who want government to stop funding social service efforts.

So is it best then for the progressive community to fight for state and federal expansion of programs like food stamps and housing assistance, while simply ignoring whether waste and fraud are limiting the effectiveness of those programs? I say no. If we truly believe that these programs provide lifelines to individuals and families who desperately need help to get by in today’s difficult economy, I would argue that while fighting to fully fund these programs, progressives also need to make sure that the people who need help the most are getting it.

If government isn’t moving to add additional funding to these programs, then the next best thing is making sure that waste and fraud isn’t taking money away from families in Woonsocket and other parts of the state who need it.

I have spoken to people who run Health and Human Services programs here in Rhode Island and in states across the country. They are good people who know how to get assistance dollars out the door and into the community. But they are not always as effective when it comes to making sure those dollars are creating the desired outcomes. So when I talk to them about the importance of program integrity, they get it and they realize it is a way to maximize their effectiveness and to make an even bigger difference in the lives of the people they are trying to help.

What is program integrity?

It’s a way to make the most of a limited pool of dollars. It’s a way to get the most bang for our social spending buck. And it’s a way to help make sure that people in need don’t get left out because assistance dollars are going to those who don’t deserve them.

Program integrity is the formal name given to efforts to ensure that spending in public assistance programs is consistent with the mission and rules of those programs. I believe that program integrity should be an issue that the progressive community backs whole-heartedly.

In SNAP, the key program integrity issue involves stopping unscrupulous retailers (most often small convenience store owners) who facilitate the conversion of food benefits in the SNAP program into cash. Like payday lenders who prey on those without access to the banking system, these people take a cut of the money for providing this service—often as much as 50% of the total benefit due to a recipient. The beneficiary is then able to use whatever cash is left for non-food items that SNAP would not pay for otherwise. An effective program can red flag retailers engaged in this practice and put an end to it, so that funds aren’t being channeled to retailers and so that the children of SNAP beneficiaries aren’t left going hungry because the funds the family was counting on went to pay for cigarettes, alcohol or other non-food items.

In programs like housing assistance, there are finite financial resources and a limited number of available housing units. Using program integrity here helps to ensure that the neediest citizens are not unfairly denied assistance. Section 8 housing can often have a waiting list of many years. If someone living in a subsidized housing unit is misrepresenting their financial situation and hanging onto the unit as a result, a needier family is being denied access. This is an issue of basic fairness and if the agency providing the benefits has the ability to make sure everyone is playing by the rules, they have an obligation to do so.

As with any effort that throws off a lot of data, there will be people who misconstrue and attempt to misuse program integrity data to undermine the mission or activities of the agency involved. But with or without data, those attacks will go on from those who are hell-bent to force the elimination of these necessary social service programs. But by gathering and acting on this data, program integrity initiatives produce a larger good—ensuring that taxpayer dollars targeted for social service programs provide the best possible results. And in the long run, improved results will effectively marginalize the empty noise made by those whose agenda does not involve producing positive outcomes in our communities.

I truly believe that government should always strive to measure the effectiveness of all programs and initiatives to determine if those programs are achieving their stated goals and operating efficiently. That holds true whether we are talking about evaluating economic development incentives, tax policy, social service spending programs or even something as unglamorous as DMV waiting lines or wait times for service at the Department of Labor and Training. To me, this analysis is a cornerstone of good governance and an indicator of government accountability to voters and taxpayers. And that’s something progressives should be proud to support.

 

And here’s my equally long editor’s note:

  • I firmly believe Ken Block’s efforts on this report was not the work of someone who would make a good governor. I think he is really smart and obviously hard-working, but, as Howard writes, it is “full of conjecture and insinuation that wouldn’t receive a passing grade in a college course.”
  • Holding such an opinion does not equate to supporting public sector fraud. In fact, many have suggested areas of government where both more fraud and more potential savings can be found. Scott MacKay suggested physician and health care industry fraud, for example.
  • I think the most common takeaway from this piece will be that the progressive left doesn’t value good government initiatives.
  • I think because of the way the mainstream media reported on Block’s SNAP investigation, the biggest effect of his efforts will be to further foster the false narrative that there is a widespread social services abuse among those who live in poverty (Again, see Sam Howard’s post).
  • I might be wrong, but it’s worth considering that I’m right. It is an indisputable fact that local Republicans and other fiscal conservatives are using the media swirl around his report to counter progressive proposals – see this video of Dave Fisher asking House Minority Leader Brain Newberry about tax equity.
  • If I’m right, it’s an example of how politicians and pundits have learned to manipulate the marketplace of ideas, which is still largely driven by print and broadcast journalism/journalists/pundits.
  • Ian Donnis and Scott MacKay are the best around at using the tools of unbiased journalism to get Rhode Island politicians on the record, and it is well worth listening to their probing interview with Block from last week.
  • However, it’s worth mentioning that MacKay, who dismissed Block’s report last week in this op/ed, tipped his hand in the interview: When Donnis asked Block if teaming up to form a “taxpayers” group with members of RISC and the tea party – probably two of the most conservative groups in the state – cast a shadow on his reputation as a “moderate,” you can actually hear MacKay laugh when Block responds by saying, “I became the president of a re-branded, move to the center organization…” (It happens at 6:55 here … perhaps MacKay coughed, but it is laughable to suggest that joining forces with Lisa Blais, Harriet Loyd and Donna Perry is an attempt to move to the center.)
  • So much of what Ken Block does reminds me of the famous Thomas Pynchon line from Gravity’s Rainbow: “If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don’t have to worry about the answers.”
  • Only news in his post: Ken Block says it is more important to increase funding to SNAP than it is to investigate waste and/or fraud.

RIPR Should Hire Andrew Gobeil To Do Talk Radio


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Photo from Twitter.

Rhode Island Public Radio should hire Andrew Gobeil to host a moderate and fair call-in talk radio show. The Ocean State could really use this. I haven’t spoken to either party about about this idea, but it sure seems to be a no-brainer to me. RIPR is a great young radio station in need of a personality to engage its listeners and Gobeil is a talented talker and a proven journalist who was fired by WPRO last week.

I know RIPR has long-sought to create something like a local On Point – a topical, call-in show with guests that enlightens listeners through engaging conversation. The still-young start up radio station would be wise to do so. There are so many of us media consumers out here working away on laptops and in offices or who would tune in daily. And if you also made it a podcast, you would get that many more listeners. Think in terms of the “virtuous circle” that WPRI is investing in.

I’m pretty certain Gobeil is the perfect fit. He’s great at live radio, he’s a proven reporter, he’s well-known, he’s well-respected and he’s all over the local social networks.

If station manager Joe O’Connor and news director Catherine Welch want to check out what Gobeil is capable of on air, they should listen to last Wednesday’s John DePetro Show. After being on live from 5 to 9 a.m., Gobeil was asked to fill in for DePetro who didn’t show up for work. Not only did he put in three additional hours on the spot with no prep time, he nailed it. I even tweeted as much at the time – twice! Here and here.

It was nuanced and fair and intelligent talk radio. Not to put too fine a point on it, but such content simply isn’t what WPRO is interested in producing. And, quite frankly, management there might indeed be right that the market won’t support it. This economic reality is both why Gobeil was fired and why public radio exists.

Progress Report: RI Tops Region in Food Insecurity; Pension Compromise Talk; Roger Williams and Thanksgiving


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
URI gave a great effort against Ohio St. on Saturday before falling to the 4th-ranked team in the country. (Photo by Bob Plain)

We’re now the number one state in New England for food insecurity, reports the ProJo this morning. 15 percent of households in the state can’t afford the food it needs. This is a crisis of epic proportions that goes largely unaddressed because the influential class doesn’t tend to know many people that are affected by it.

To that end, kudos to these Providence College students who helped deliver leftover cafeteria food to some of the most needy people in our community.

Scott MacKay, who knows how local politics works as well as any Rhode Islander, suggests its time for the state and labor unions to strike a deal on pension reform … letting the legal system work it out, he argues is potentially very expensive and at the least very risky for taxpayers. Plus, Providence and Mayor Taveras has shown that this is a far better option politically, as well.

Speaking of pension reform, not one of the 17 state legislators who voted against it lost in the election for doing so, reports GoLocal.

And back to RIPR for a moment … Ian Donnis seems irked that I’m still irked that WPRI kept Abel Collins out of a televised debate! Interestingly, I actually think WPRI did Collins an electoral favor by snubbing him – he got more earned media by not being included than he would have had he debated, which wasn’t his strong suit as a candidate in the first place. That said, I don’t think affect on outcome is the standard by which media organizations should determine who should and should not be included in debates. I think it should be based on what potential voters should know about their options … news coverage doesn’t exist for candidates to benefit from, it exists for consumers to learn from.

The Boston Globe reports America owes Thanksgiving to Rhode Island’s own Roger Williams, not the Puritans who are often giving the credit.

Whose at fault for Hostess filing for bankruptcy? Labor, which didn’t agree to an 8 percent pay cut, or the CEO who took a 80 percent pay increase before asking employees to make a sacrifice? Either way, that’s no way to come to the negotiating table.

Progress Report: State of Local Media; At Last, Three-Way Debate; Energy Politics; Dems on Doherty Gets Little Press


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Every progressive – indeed every Rhode Islander, if not all Americans! – owe it to themselves to spend some time reading Providence Monthly’s awesome feature on the state of journalism in Rhode Island. The magazine put together a group of the best and brightest reporters we’ve got here in the Ocean State who kicked around everything from the future of news and how we consume it to media bias and responsibility. Please read this to understand a little better how local journalism is trying to serve you!

Speaking of local journalism … thank heavens for the local debates so we can hear the candidates actually discuss the issues that we should be making our decisions on. Both networks deserve credit for their investment in these commercial drains. Last night WJAR hosted all three CD1 candidates and it made for a much better conversation on the issues than the false narrative of only two viewpoints that the WPRI debates fostered. You can watch the whole thing here if you missed it or read the ProJo’s account here.

Their back and forth on energy policy, I think, is interesting to note: Doherty’s idea is to drill baby drill, a disastrous idea from an environmental perspective.Everyone short of Sarah Palin and Dick Cheney pretty much agreed on this until we started realizing how poor we are back in 2008/09.

Cicilline, on the other hand, had a much more nuanced approach that doesn’t make for as a good as sound byte. He spoke of a bill he introduced that would better regulate Wall Street trading of oil. After all, it isn’t supply, which is down, that is driving up the price of oil, it’s quite literally the stock market’s need to maximize money-making on all trad-able commodities. More drilling would serve Big Oil and Wall Street  more than the consumer. More regulation would serve the consumer more than Big Oil and Wall Street.

In a nutshell, that’s the big policy difference between Doherty and Cicilline: the Doherty, whether he even understands this or not, would serve the 1 percent while Cicilline would represent the rest of us.

Speaking of the Cicilline Doherty campaign, and local media bias … the entire Democratic party came together to call out Brendan “Uncommon Integrity” Doherty for his historically negative and misleading campaign. And it hardly got covered at all. This is actually a very important component of what voters should know about Brendan Doherty, who is asking us to trust that he won’t be a shill for the GOP if we elect him to Congress … but what we know of his campaign is that he represents himself differently from how he behaves. If local political reporters truly believe it is part of their jobs to call balls and strikes, they should be doing so on this issue.

Aaron Regunberg writes an excellent piece in GoLocal today about Gordon Fox’s come-to-progressive awakening this campaign season. Here’s the comment Regunberg, one of the best local opinion writers and thinkers around, made on my Gordon Fox endorsement. By the way, read all the comments to see how disappointed some RI Future readers are with my supporting Gordon Fox over Mark Binder…

Narragansett Patch has a fun story about a recently-returned Charlie-O’s flag that was stolen from the popular bar with URI students, mysteriously enough, during my days as an undergrad and Charlie O’s patron… (Sorry Steve Greenwell – some mysteries are better left unsolved…)

Speaking of URI, the Rhody Rams mens hoops team opens its exhibition season against the Coast Guard Academy tonight in the Keaney Closet. Being the biggest publicly-financed sports team in the state, the URI Rams are, in my humble opinion, the official athletic squad of the local progressive community!

And speaking of sports … we’re suing Curt Schilling. I’m glad from an informational perspective and it’s certainly necessary from a legal liability point of view, but I’m also worried this whole thing ends with Big Schill putting some sort of Ruthian hex on the Ocean State.

Progress Report, Halloween/Post-Sandy Edition: Cicilline, Doherty Neck and Neck; Pols Without Power, Ocean Mist


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

It seems in David Cicilline’s struggle to retain his seat in Congress  that it will all come down to the so-called ‘get out the vote’ efforts, or the boots on the ground in the final few days of the campaign, according to a new WPRI poll that shows Cicilline with a 1 point lead over challenger Brendan Doherty. Check out WPRI’s really, really cool interactive pie chart on their poll results here.

The biggest surprise in the Cicilline v. Doherty slugfest is not that the race has seemingly tightened (polls typically do as the election gets closer), it’s that Doherty has perhaps managed match Anthony Gemma in ugly and untrue campaign accusations. While Doherty hides behind the fact that some of the worst ads weren’t paid for by him, he’s certainly setting the tone. Case in point: his campaign defends the often untrue TV ads by saying that Cicilline started it by going negative first. That’s uncommon integrity in the same way that Oliver Twist possessed uncommon wealth … uncommon because of its dearth. Ian Donnis has a nice piece on the new dueling Doherty ads that hit the airwaves yesterday.

Also from the WPRI poll: Senator Sheldon Whitehouse and Congressman Jim Langevin are still expected to walk to victory over their Republican challengers. “…the big thing is Collins is drawing 9% of the vote,” pollster Joe Fleming told WPRI. “That is very high for an independent, and in turn Michael Riley can’t get any traction going because Mr. Collins is drawing votes away from people who don’t like Jim Langevin.”

Remember on Sunday when I postulated that hurricanes could be called progressive natural disasters because they disproportionately affect the rich and powerful? Well RIPR reports that both our US Senators and the governor are still without power. I don’t know where Sheldon lives, but Jack Reed lives in a coastal neighborhood in Jamestown and Gov. Chafee lives right on the water in the Potowomut area of Warwick. According to folks I know in both those neighborhoods, Reed got power back yesterday around 3 p.m. and Chafee’s street is still without electricity.

Think about this for one second: as a result of little more than simply growing up in an affluent suburb, I know neighbors – and friends – of probably most of our state officials … journalists who grew up in West Warwick and Central Falls don’t enjoy that advantage. It’s just one of the many benefits of being raised around affluence. And why if society doesn’t work hard to level the playing field between the haves and the have-nots it can quickly spiral out of control, as we’re currently witnessing…

Speaking of the socioeconomic divide in America and why we should mitigate against it, consider this NPR headline: Want To Be Rich? Be Lucky, Know The Right People.

And speaking of Hurricane Sandy, every storm that the Ocean Mist survives is a gift. Check out this ProJo photo and you’ll see why. We won’t have this iconic beach bar forever, so enjoy it while you can…

And speaking of the Ocean Mist, I know a guy who used to moonlight as a bouncer there so he could make ends meet while working for a municipal public works department during the day. He worked throughout the dangerous winds and even more dangerous surf of Sandy all Monday and into early Tuesday morning, just so the world would be a bit safer for the rest of us. This is the kind of person who is getting their retirement security slashed by pension reformers.

If you think gerrymandering has become too political, read about how Nevada became the 36th state, which happened today in 1864.

Happy Halloween, everybody … did you know you can watch the horror classic “The Texas Chainsaw Massacre” on YouTube?

Progress Report: Talk Radio in RI; Chafee and Narragansett Indians; Tom Brady and Jamie Dimon; Debate Reaction


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Most interesting thing happening today: Matt Allen, Ian Donnis, Ted Nesi and Josh Fenton debate the influence of talk radio in Rhode Island politics at RIC.

While radio may not seem like the medium of the future, as the most passive way to consume content I think it is likely to rise again. And even in its current state of decline, it is still amazingly influential in the local marketplace of ideas. Rhode Island Public Radio, for which Donnis works, would do well to offer a thoughtful alternative to the four angry conservative men featured on WPRO, one of which is Matt Allen.

Or better yet, RI Future should. If anyone is interested in podcasting a progressive call-in talk show, please contact me!

Speaking of Ian Donnis, RIPR’s political reporter got a nice scoop yesterday about Gov. Chafee being open to giving the Narragansett Indian Tribe a larger slice of the state’s gambling take.

It’s hard to root for Tom Brady when you read about the golden boy quarterback offering sympathy to Jamie Dimon, the CEO of JP Morgan Chase who if isn’t one of the architects of our financial collapse was at the very least one of the pilots steering the ship. (Dissing Tom Brady will make me extremely unpopular with one of my favorite group of readers: the kids I grew up with, who by and large worship at both the Church of Brady AND the Church of Wall Street.)

I love this balmy Indian summer weather as much as anyone, but make no mistake that these unseasonably warm October days mean treacherous things for our climate. In fact, according to today’s ProJo, it’s probably already destroyed the state’s lobster population. “We think there is a clear climate drive to this,” a DEM marine scientist told the ProJo as to why there are virtually no more lobsters in Narragansett Bay.

The East Providence municipal budget heads to the state-appointed Budget Commission, but not without some controversy.  A city councilor says a budget commissioner of “purposely pitted special education against the general education population and the community at large,” according to East Providence Patch.

Political Wire collects some interesting reactions to last night’s debate. You can read mine here. GoLocal asks the local experts what they thought of the big presidential debate last night. (Thanks for including me on this list!)

My favorite moment of the debate: Romney’s “binders full of women” moment.

Don’t forget: the Dalai Lama is in Providence today, our de facto religion correspondent Steve Ahlquist reports.

Progress Report: Working Class Missing from Electoral Politics; URI Prof. Critiques Brown Poll; Saturday Night Live


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Ryan’s Pond, North Kingstown. (Photo by Bob Plain)

It’s little wonder that the United States and Rhode Island so often side with the wealthy when it comes to politics … after all, by and large that is who we elect to office, says .

About the Rhode Island State House, he writes, “The trend toward meager political representation by former blue-collar workers holds mostly true in Rhode Island – where the biggest General Assembly caucus is made of lawyers, not Democrats or Republicans.”

Donnis quotes a New York Times piece that says of this year’s presidential campaign, “If we want government for the people, we’ve got to start working toward government by the people. The 2012 election offers us a stark choice between two very different approaches to economic policy. But it’s still a choice between two Harvard-educated millionaires.”

Former Anthony Gemma spokesman Alex Morash says he’s supporting David Cicilline for Congress. So much for the nasty Democratic primary … amybe it was all just politics…

URI poly sci prof and pollster Victor Profughi has been taking issue with the methodology Brown’s Taubmann Center used in its recent poll. He took issue with another Brown Poll recently too … when we accused the Ivy League polling org with doing a push poll on pension politics. Here’s the comment he posted to RI Future.

Also in ProJo’s Political Scene column this morning, the Center for Free Market Anarchy and Punishing the Poor (or whatever it is Mike Stenhouse and Justin Katz call their kooky conservative “think” tank) said Rhode Island should do away with its sales tax and its still-being-created health care exchange as well as enact new laws to hurt organized labor … I don’t know Stenhouse but I know Katz and he is a good enough guy but he represents a kind of conservative that doesn’t really exist in this state to any significant degree, though he’d be in good company in southern Utah or northern Idaho. Stenhouse, for his part, is an ex-Red Sox … not really the best thing to have on your resume for why you can help RI’s economy…

But maybe I’m wrong … after all, another member of the Center pens a piece saying this state’s support for a voter ID law shows it’s not just for the ALEC crowd

It’s worth watching Ted Nesi interview John Hazen-White Jr. … a local CEO who sticks up for the Occupy movement and holds a lot of other beliefs not always indicative of the 1 percent.

The scary future for charter schools: “Computer modules would replace the teacher in front of the classroom.”

On this day in Rhode Island history: Occupy Providence begins its occupation of Burnside Park.

We all know SNL does great (increasingly viral) political skits and you may have already seen its farce of the veep debate from Saturday night, which was super funny … but this one teasing spoiled American’s reliance on technology was my favorite: