Polls Show Why Few Counted David Cicilline Out


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
U.S. Congressman David Cicilline (D-RI)

David Cicilline got some good news when WPRI’s independent poll confirmed what Democratic pollsters had been saying: that he was beating challenger Brendan Doherty in opinion polling.

But the added bonus is that he got to shut up doubting ninnies like me by proving us wrong. Earlier this year, when the polling was especially bleak, I attributed him staying in the race to stubborn pride and a Democratic Party incapable of removing problematic incumbents. While there is a certain amount of ego associated with being a politician, “pride” might’ve been too strong a word. “Confidence in his own abilities,” seems more appropriate (a confidence that outstripped that of many cynics like myself). And the RI Democratic Party’s problems are endemic to political parties that have had many of their functions taken over by government (often for good reason).

It’s too soon for jubilation in the Democratic camp, but for Mr. Cicilline and his supporters (and progressives), the increasingly likely chance that a Republican won’t represent RI’s First Congressional District is a heartening sign that cooler heads have prevailed.

I’ve long said that simply being “against David Cicilline” is not enough to carry the election. Anthony Gemma proved that it was certainly not enough to win a Democratic primary. And Mr. Doherty may soon find that it’s not enough to carry a general election. This is a problem for Mr. Doherty, because when you take away the “I’m not David Cicilline” argument, what does he really have? He’ll be a Republican but not a total Republican. He’ll vote to repeal Obamacare, but only when the Republicans have something to replace it with (don’t hold your breath). The days of “maverick” Republicans are gone: Sarah Palin saw to that. See, no one trusts maverick Republicans. Republicans don’t like them because they don’t always follow party dogma. Democrats dislike them because they follow GOP dogma too often. I seem to remember a Bible passage about how a slave can’t serve two masters.

Another factor which is worth noting is that Mr. Cicilline is a damn fine campaigner. Having worked on a campaign that got our asses handed to us by his operation, I had confidence that his campaign would not slip up; a meeting with his campaign manager Eric Hyers confirmed that the campaign was likewise highly confident in their candidate. But even a good campaigner can run into problems, especially with an albatross like Providence hanging around his neck.

Providence City Hall

Except, it has not yet really turned out to be an albatross. Certainly the “excellent fiscal condition” misstatement was hammering him hard for a while. But Mr. Cicilline did his act of contrition. Mayor Angel Taveras has pulled the city away from bankruptcy while at the same time publicly supporting our embattled congressman. And then: messenger matters.

Neither Anthony Gemma nor Brendan Doherty could have been/can be convincing bearers of the Providence attack. For one, neither of them live in Providence. Neither were they Cassandras during Mr. Cicilline’s tenure in Providence. The most convincing type of person who could’ve utilized that attack would have to be an opponent from perhaps the Providence city council, who spent the last two years in a higher state office (with part of that being a run for Congress). There is not a politician who fits that description. There’s no one who fits that description.

Furthermore, the Providence argument is problematic. If you’re talking about dishonest politicians alright, but I still think it sounds a bit more cheerleader-y than dishonest. But if the implication is that the way Mr. Cicilline treated Providence’s finances is indicative of the way he’d treat the country’s finances (though a city is not really comparable to a nation for how their economies work), then you get into the deficit and how you bring that down. And everyone in Rhode Island knows the Republican solution: cut everything that doesn’t blow people/things up. I can see why Mr. Doherty is not taking that tact.

The race is by no means over as we head into the final months. I can always be wrong twice (my ardent critics will say “most of the time”). But if you were pessimistic about the chance that a progressive Democrat would retain their hold on the First Congressional District, you can smile now. A bit.

Progressive Politicians, Proposals Popular in Poll


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

A month before the election a new WPRI poll shows Rhode Islanders comfortably support both progressive politicians as well as progressive policy proposals.

The big news from the new poll for both politicos and progressives is that Congressman David Cicilline leapfrogged Brendan Doherty since the last WPRI poll and the liberal incumbent now leads the conservative challenger by six percentage points.

“The new survey of 250 likely voters in Rhode Island’s 1st Congressional District shows Democrat Cicilline at 44%, Republican Doherty at 38% and independent David Vogel at 6%, with 10% of voters undecided. That’s a 21-point swing since the February WPRI 12 poll, when Doherty led Cicilline 49% to 34%,” wrote Ted Nesi about Cicilline’s surge.

Pollster Joe Fleming said he was “surprised” at the size of the turnaround but I’m not. Rhode Islanders lean left and one of the candidates is and one isn’t liberal. While Doherty will continue to go negative against Cicilline, at the end of the day the incumbent isn’t nearly as toxic as is the Republican brand in the first congressional district.

Similarly, popular progressive Senator Sheldon Whitehouse holds a “commanding” lead over his “little-known” challenger Barry Hinckley. “Whitehouse leads among every subgroup of voters except Republicans,” writes Nesi. “The Democrat has a 26-point lead among women, a 26-point lead among voters ages 60 and older, and a nine-point lead among independents.”

Like the most progressive members of the congressional delegation, progressive policy proposals also fared well in the poll – most notably marriage equality.

“Same-sex marriage enjoys significant support in Rhode Island, with 56% of voters in favor of legalizing it, 36% opposed to doing so and 14% unsure,” according to WPRI. “Support is strongest among Democrats (72% in favor) and voters ages 18 to 39 (64% in favor), while opposition is highest among Republicans (59% opposed) and voters 60 and older (43% opposed).”

The overwhelming support for marriage equality could turn some State House politicians who were on the fence because they may have thought their constituents didn’t support equality.

“Every day more Rhode Islanders are raising a voice in support of marriage equality and this poll should serve as a wake up call to those politicians who continue to oppose equal rights. We look forward to working with legislators from both sides of the aisle when the General Assembly returns in January to finally make Rhode Island a state that honors the commitments and values the worth of all families,” said Ray Sullivan of Marriage Equality Rhode Island in a statement.

One poll question shows Rhode Islanders overwhelmingly supporting protecting Medicare over paying down the national debt by a 64 percent to 32 percent margin.  Another shows that while the economy and jobs is the most important issue to Rhode Islanders, with 54 percent of respondents saying so, more than twice as many (18 percent) said healthcare was the most important issue than said taxes (8 percent).

WPRI does a great job putting all their poll results into an interactive graphic that is really fun to play around with.

Later today, the TV station will release the results of poll questions pertaining to Gov. Linc Chafee, Treasurer Gina Raimondo, Providence Mayor Angel Taveras and President Obama.

TV Ad Ties Doherty to Romney, Republicans


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Driving home the point that Brendan Doherty would side with conservative Republicans instead of Rhode Islanders if elected to office, Congressman David Cicilline has a new TV ad out today that illustrates this.

In a press release, Cicilline campaign manager Eric Hyers added, “At the end of the day, Brendan Doherty wants Republicans in control of Congress and Mitt Romney setting the agenda in the White House. In fact, he thinks Romney would “be fantastic for Rhode Island. Rhode Islanders will have a clear choice this November between re-electing President Obama and Congressman Cicilline so we can get our state back on the right track, or voting for Mitt Romney, Brendan Doherty, and the Washington Republicans who got us into this mess to begin with.”

The release goes on:

In January 2012, Doherty formally endorsed Romney for President in January 2012, describing him as a “proven leader.”  In the same month, Doherty traveled to New Hampshire to campaign for Romney and was later introduced to the Republican presidential nominee by former Rhode Island Governor Don Carcieri.

The ad also outlines areas where Romney and Doherty agree on policy – including their support for repealing President Obama’s historic health care reform law, as well as their mutual opposition to reproductive freedoms for women and the Buffett Rule that would require millionaires to pay at least the same tax rate as the middle class.

Progress Report: David Cicilline Predicts Dems Can Capture House; Dan Yorke, Bill Fischer on Polls vs. Push Polls


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Downtown Providence from the Providence River. (Photo by Bob Plain)

It’s well established that things are looking pretty good for David Cicilline, and now Cicilline is predicting good things for Democrats prospects of retaking control of the House of Representatives. The incumbent congressman told RIPR’s Ian Donnis, “The reality is we need 24 seats to take control away from the Republican Tea Party caucus that is now leading the House . I think it’s absolutely possible for Democrats to take back the House.”

Cicilline might be right. Mitt Romney’s 47 percent comments have completely rejiggered congressional contests all over the country, and strategists think it could cost the GOP the Senate.

Speaking of the 47 percent, here’s how the 53 percent benefit from government subsidies.

Dan Yorke had a great and informative conversation with Dem spokesman Bill Fischer yesterday afternoon about polls … if you want to know more about the difference between polls and push polls, listen to the segment. There’s been a lot of misinformation going around about the difference.

This should be a huge concern for Rhode Island: “More than a fifth of children in Rhode Island are living in poverty, and over 10 percent are in extreme poverty.”

New York Times columnist Joe Nocera had a great piece on the Chicago teachers’ strike and the so-called education reform movement. He writes, “teachers are fighting for the things industrial unions have always fought for: seniority, favorable work rules and fierce resistance to performance measures. City Hall is fighting to institute reforms no top-performing country has ever seen fit to use, and which probably won’t make much difference if they are instituted.”

Aaron Regunberg also wrote about the Chicago teachers’ strike for GoLocal.

Bob Kerr on the father-daughter dance controversy in Cranston: “This is nonsense. There is legal cover for it, but it is nonsense. It sounds like a spoof on political correctness, but it is far too real.”

Rest in peace, Mary Carpenter … Rhode Island owes the entire Carpenter family a debt of gratitude for helping to make Matunuck the community it is today.

Today in 1938, a hurricane hits Rhode Island.

Doherty Distances Himself from 47 Percent Remark


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Brendan Doherty

Brendan Doherty has distanced himself from Mitt Romney’s politically devastating comments about the 47 percent, according to the Providence Journal.

“I don’t agree with Mitt Romney’s characterization,” Doherty said in a statement to the ProJo.

Exactly what part of Romney’s diatribe against income tax-less moochers with no personal responsibility Doherty disagrees with wasn’t clear. He didn’t actually talk to the reporter, John Mulligan, rather Doherty just sent a press release about it, it seems.

But at least Mulligan got a release. I made several overtures to the Doherty campaign and they ignored them all. (And Dave Layman and I are friends!) It’s almost as if Doherty disdains progressives the way Romney does the 47 percent.

What is clear is what Doherty, who has endorsed Romney for president, has said about him in the past: “Mitt Romney is a proven leader who will stand by his convictions while seeking consensus to find real solutions to the daunting challenges facing our nation.”

It’s hard to make the case that Romney is a consensus builder after he got caught on video saying “my job is is not to worry about those people. I’ll never convince them they should take personal responsibility and care for their lives.”

It’s also going to be hard for Doherty to make the case that he doesn’t share Romney’s belief that poor people are lazy and lucky. Especially when he then campaigns with other right-wing Republicans like Devin Nunes, about whom Democratic Party spokesman Bill Fischer said, “Nunes has described Medicaid as a program ‘imposed on the poor’ and has stood with Paul Ryan in support of radically altering the safety net for our seniors.”

Similarly, Doherty wants to repeal Obamacare but extend George Bush’s tax cuts for the rich.

Doherty may say he doesn’t agree with Romney’s off-color comments about the 47 percent, but if elected you can bet he would vote as if he agrees with them.

Cicilline Leads Doherty in Third Poll Since Primary


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

A third poll since the primary shows Congressman David Cicillne with a comfortable lead over conservative newcomer Brendan Doherty, this one was commissioned by the Cicilline campaign and shows him enjoying a 51 to 41 edge over right wing Republican.

“Democrat David Cicilline has secured majority support over Republican challenger Brendan Doherty in the race for Rhode Island’s First Congressional seat,” said a memo from pollster Diane Feldman, of the Feldman Group, to the Cicilline campaign. “With only 8 percent undecided, the contest is not very mobile and Cicilline is the likely winner of it.”

Accounting for three-way race, “Cicilline leads Doherty 46 percent to 36 percent, with independent candidate David Vogel receiving 7 percent and 11 percent of voters undecided,” according to her memo.

The results closely mimic a recent poll conducted by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, which showed Cicilline with an 11-point lead over Doherty.

Feldman’s memo says, “Voters favor Democratic positions on many key issues facing the country, including health care reform. Seventy-two (72) percent of voters in the First Congressional District support the Democratic position favoring the Affordable Care Act, while 22 percent of voters favor the Republican position of repealing the Affordable Care Act completely, and starting the process of health care reform all over again.”

Doherty has said he is opposed to Obama’s landmark healthcare reform bill.

“The First Congressional District remains heavily Democratic,” Feldman wrote in her memo. “President Barack Obama dominates Republican challenger Mitt Romney and fully 50 percent of voters believe their families are better off if Democrats have a majority in the United States Congress, while only 16 percent of voters feel their families are be better off if Republicans have a majority.”

Progress Report: Cicilline Surging Against Doherty; GOP for Father-Daughter Dances; Affordable Housing; 47 Percent


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

David Cicilline is surging. After comfortably beating Anthony Gemma in the primary it now looks like he’s comfortably ahead of his conservative challenger Brendan Doherty in polls commissioned by the Democrats. While Republicans, Buddy Cianci and other Cicilline detractors might dismiss partisan polls, it still gives the incumbent an advantage and shows momentum.

We’ll have more on Cicilline’s surge later this morning…

State House Republicans say they will join in the controversy in Cranston about what to call elementary school dances in Cranston (your tax dollars at work?). But this isn’t a partisan issue, as evidenced by David Cicilline’s position on the issue.

Three cheers to Gina Raimondo for using her political capital to advocate for affordable housing funding. She’s pushing for voters to approve a $25 million bond to build and/or rehab 600 units. This is an important economic development opportunity for Rhode Island. Raimondo is a longtime board member of Crossroads Rhode Island and her commitment to homeless people is admirable.

That said, we find it distasteful that she claims pension cuts made it possible to go out to bond for affordable housing. Of course, rolling back tax cuts for the wealthy – a move she objects to – would have a similar effect on the state’s finances. And, it would do so without pitting the working class against itself. In other words, she is arguing that the state needed to take money from teachers and state workers in order to give it to the homeless. Her logic reminds me of railroad tycoon Jay Gould’s famous quote: “I can hire one half of the working class to kill the other half.”

Speaking of class warfare, the Providence Journal weighs in on Mitt Romney’s 47 percent comment with a pretty muddled editorial. More to the point is what the New York Times editorial board said about it: “It turns out that Mitt Romney was right. There is class warfare being waged in the 2012 campaign. It is Mr. Romney who is waging it, not President Obama, and he’s stood the whole idea on its head.” Even the conservative-leaning Washington Post editorial board writes: “Mr. Romney suggests that Obama voters are such sheep that there is no point in reaching out to them — and that their support for Democrats is purely selfish. The possibility that principles might motivate their political behavior does not even occur to Mr. Romney. It’s a demeaning, as well as inaccurate, view of the people he hopes to lead.”

GOP strategists think Romney’s comments could give Democrats the inside track for control of the Senate. And Democrats think it could put them in position to take back the House. Unlike moderate Republican candidates from across the nation, RI GOP candidates have been completely silent on the controversy.

Update: Brendan Doherty has distanced himself from the comments, according to the ProJo.

Happy birthday, Upton Sinclair. The author of “The Jungle” was born today in 1878.

And today in 173, Billie Jean King beat Bobby Riggs in tennis.

Doherty’s Campaign Is Being Untrustworthy


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Brendan Doherty

So far Brendan Doherty is running his campaign against David Cicilline not all that differently from how Anthony Gemma campaigned against the incumbent congressman: make a lot of accusations and see which ones stick.

So far, not all of them have.

While the conservative Republican got a lot of media attention the day after the primary for his announcing Cicilline’s ten biggest deceptions, it turns out Doherty was the one doing the deceiving with regard to at least 20 percent of the list.  The Providence Journal Politifact team has looked into two of the ten accusations Doherty made about Cicilline and found them both to be “mostly false.”

In the first, Doherty accuses Cicilline of intentionally missing deadlines for an audit of Providence finances. Politifact says, “The facts argue otherwise. In the end, we have the former head of the Rhode Island State Police making allegations without key evidence, and ignoring evidence that points in another direction.”

In the second piece, Doherty tries to make the assertion that a former campaign worker didn’t repay a loan to the Providence Economic Development Partnership. According to Politifact, the borrower paid back 93 percent of the loan after defaulting on it. “Doherty cited the case as one of Cicilline’s “most serious deceptions.” It’s not clear that any deception was involved. And Doherty provided no such evidence. Because the statement contains some element of truth but ignores critical facts that would give a different impression, we rate it Mostly False.”

Brendan Doherty’s baggage is supposed to be that he is a conservative Republican who will side with other conservative Republicans in congress. But Politifact has examined his statements four times so far and he’s been less-than-spot-on in three of them. Not what you want the paper of record writing about you if you’re waging a trust campaign.

Here’s what Doherty said at his presser about the value of being honest: “You have shown yourself to be untrustworthy and therefore unqualified to represent the people of Rhode Island.”

One Dem Party That Donna Perry Doesn’t Understand


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Logo for RI Democratic Party
Logo for RI Democratic Party
Logo of the RI Democratic Party

First, right off the bat: anyone who uses the phrase “Democrat Party” is already showing their ignorance of the Democratic Party. You should still read their arguments, but chances are, they’re going to be off-base. And that’s what Donna Perry’s column in GoLocalProv is (the URL says Julia Steiny for some reason).

Ms. Perry tries to set up a scenario of a polarized RI Democratic Party; a “traditional apparatus” Democratic Party under the command of Chairman Ed Pacheco and another “union-social liberal” Democratic party, with NEARI’s Bob Walsh as leader (because, why not, that works). Ms. Perry’s scenario breaks down almost immediately, though she muddles through to the correct conclusion arrived at by the wrong route (that Democratic Primary results “lacking a narrative,” as WPRI’s Ted Nesi put it, are likely to continue). As Ms. Perry points out, there were a number of races where unions and marriage equality supporters worked for different candidates. If Mr. Walsh is to be the head of Ms. Perry’s fictional second Democratic Party, he seems to be doing a piss-poor job of it (no offense meant, Bob, but get your fictional party in line).

Ms. Perry points to two races for Senate; Maryellen Butke vs. Gayle Goldin and Mike McCaffrey vs. Laura Pisaturo. In the interest of space, I’ll focus solely on the former.

In Ms. Perry’s telling, Ms. Butke the marriage equality and education reform “powerhouse” is defeated by Ms. Goldin the union-chosen candidate. This faux narrative completely ignores the fact that Ms. Butke, despite gobs of cash, ran a confusing campaign that both bashed the Democratic Party and retiring Senator Rhoda Perry, and then tried proposing that Ms. Butke was the true “progressive successor” to Rhoda Perry. One mailing had Ms. Butke’s happy campaign on one side, and an attack piece on Ms. Goldin in mock Goldin colors on the other. The attack piece attempted to tie Ms. Goldin to policies she had nothing to do with, citing sources that make zero mention of Ms. Goldin; including one of Mr. Nesi’s blog posts that simply pointed out that the ultimate cost of the $75 million 38 Studios loan guarantee was closer to $112 million.

On top of this, Ms. Perry neglects to mention that Senator-elect Goldin isn’t exactly any kind of right-wing ideologue; she’s worked for an organization that wants to eliminate gender inequity and implement social justice! Oh, the horror! How could liberal Providence East Side Democratic Primary voters dare choose Ms. Goldin? In essence, there wasn’t much difference between the candidates, and Ms. Butke’s semi-negative campaigning was not effective (though she was quite energetic).

Ms. Perry has made the mistake of thinking of groups as monolithic. She’s done well in beginning to not think of the Democratic Party as monolithic. But now she’s gone and begun thinking of her fake “two Democratic Parties” as being monolithic. Or social liberal or union voters as monolithic. Just because you support marriage equality doesn’t mean you always vote for the louder marriage equality candidate. Just because you’re in a union doesn’t mean you’re going to vote the way the union tells you.

The Democratic Party in Rhode Island is not really under the control of anyone. It is a large-scale coalition of disparate groups. You can’t make blanket assumptions about any one group within that coalition. They range from various unions (unions often work against one another), environmental groups, farmers, various minority communities, LGBTQ activists, internet freedom activists, anti-poverty crusaders, pro-life activists, education reformers, corporate leaders, lawyers, neoliberals, etc., etc. Heck, even though he lost, ALEC Democrat Jon Brien is still very much part of the Democratic Party of Rhode Island.

If there is a narrative from primary night, it’s that the Democratic Party is shifting left. Unions and marriage-equality supporters didn’t really lose any ground, they only gained it, knocking off a number of their opponents. Yes, they didn’t win everything, but then, no one does. They all won under the Democratic Party banner, which should be pleasing to the Democratic Party (a displeasing result would be a large organized mass of union and/or social liberal candidate running as independents and not participating in the primary). David Cicilline absolutely crushed Anthony Gemma, which should make many Democrats smile. Going into the general election, Democrats are going to have quite an advantage, with higher turnout rates to support President Barack Obama.

So, no, Ms. Perry, as much as you, or I, might wish it, there are not three parties in Rhode Island. There’s one. It’s called the Democratic Party. It runs the state. It’s in charge. It screws up, it succeeds. How powerful is it, you might ask? Well, let’s see why I didn’t count the Republican Party as a party.

Take a look at the first television ads for Barry Hinckley and Brendan Doherty. They’re only 30 seconds each (and rather benign), so it’ll only take about a minute. Notice anything? Both candidates use the phrase “both parties” when talking about who to blame for America’s economic situation. Both fail to make use of the color red, strongly associated with Republicans, instead opting for blue (strongly associated with Democrats). And most damning of all? Neither mention their party affiliation; only Mr. Doherty shows it (barely) onscreen, I assume because of law forcing him to show that the National Republican Committee helped pay for the ad. That should tell you all you need to know about the Republican Party in Rhode Island.

VIDEO: Cicilline Trounces Gemma; Doherty Is Next


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

As was widely predicted, Congressman David Cicilline handily beat his primary challenger and now moves on to face conservative Republican Brendan Doherty in the general election.

Cicilline not only defeated Anthony Gemma, he destroyed him. He garnered 60 percent of the vote and Gemma got just 30 percent. In fact, Cicilline beat Gemma by more votes than Gemma beat Chris Young by, who scored 8 percent.

Here’s the video of Cicilline’s victory speech:

Remembering September 11


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Today, my thoughts are with all those who lost family and friends on September 11, 2001 during the terrorist attacks on our country.  Despite the passage of time, I am sure that those who lost loved ones continue to suffer unspeakable pain and they should continue to remain in our thoughts and prayers.
I am especially mindful of the brave first responders who lost their own lives while bringing aid to the victims.  Today reminds all of us that we should never take our freedoms for granted. America is safer than we were 11 years ago – we are more vigilant as a nation and better equipped to respond to emerging threats – and this is because of the brave men and women in uniform who are serving our country all over the world.  I thank them for their sacrifice and the sacrifice of their families.

Local Media Enabled Gemma’s Recklessness


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Anthony Gemma continues his scorched-earth quest for the Democratic nomination for Congress in District 1, and local reporters are helping to do the scorching.

Look at all the great headlines he’s gotten out of allegations that amount to nothing:

Golocalprov.com: “Gemma Accuses Cicilline of Voter Fraud“, “Cicilline Aides Named in Gemma’s Accusations“, “Gemma to Call on Cicilline to Resign Today.”  Providence Journal: “Gemma sets up ‘tip hotline’ in voter fraud probe“, “In secretly recorded video, an offer to deliver absentee ballot votes for money“, “RI Congressional Candidate sent ballot fraud complaint to a campaign finance commission“, “Republican congressional candidate Doherty ‘troubled’ by allegations against opponent Cicilline“, “Gemma to detail findings at noon of probe into voter fraud“, “Gemma campaign hired Warwick detective firm to look into voter fraud“.

The morning after Gemma’s press conference where he let these charges fly, the Journal actually had this headline:  “Gemma alleges voter fraud; Cicilline denies accusation.”  This was after a press conference where not a shred of evidence was presented to make the link, despite a couple of weeks’ worth of promises otherwise.

The stories behind these headlines did not appear out of the air, though lots of them did begin with press releases from the Gemma campaign. These stories were written by real writers, with real names, like Philip Marcelo, John Mulligan, Kathy Gregg, and Zachary Malinowski of the Providence Journal and Dan McGowan of golocalprov.com, Dan Jaehnig and Katie Davis of Channel 10, and more.

Let’s be clear, too. There has been no evidence presented for these allegations beyond the allegations themselves. To me, they seem the invention of a few people who appear to want to seem like players, and relentlessly (and effectively) flogged by Gemma.

If you’ve been around politics in RI for any length of time, you’ve met some of these people. They want you to know how important they are and how worldly, i.e. cynical. They tell you fabulous stories about corruption and influence and the things they’ve seen that would curl your hair, and so on. The real purpose of these tales is not the transfer of information, but the aggrandizement of the teller in the eyes of the gullible. After all, only someone with connections would be privy to such wild tales.

In truth, I doubt that the reporters who have been writing these stories are all that gullible, but it is undeniable fact that the stories they have written and the headlines laid on those stories have abetted the dirty and unprincipled campaign strategy Anthony Gemma has chosen. He has successfully taken an idiotic story of no news value except as it reflects on his own judgment, and turned it into weeks of headlines. And it wasn’t the partisan media — the John DePetros and Travis Rowleys of the state — who helped him most effectively. It was the leaders of the mainstream press who kept the story alive, teasing Gemma’s “tell-all” press conference, broadcasting his videos, reprinting his press releases about how much he’d spent on the probe.  However skeptical they style themselves, they have done his bidding.

The allegations themselves are ridiculous. Please remember that the Mayoral elections in question, in 2002 and 2006, were not close races. In the 2002 Democratic primary, Cicilline won a clear majority in a 4-way race and went on to win the general election with 84% of the vote. In 2006 he faced only token opposition in the primary and general elections, and won 83% of the vote.  None of these outcomes were in any doubt at the time, though David Igliozzi, Keven McKenna, and Joe Paolino may remember the 2002 primary somewhat differently than I do.

The “Larger Story”

What of the larger story?  The idea that these allegations buttress what we already “know” about Cicilline’s dishonesty?  These mostly stem from the chaos of Providence’s budget during 2010, when the state slashed a tremendous amount of aid to the city in the final quarter of the fiscal year and when the City Council refused to ratify a budget until after some of the savings it anticipated were impossible to achieve.

I’ve looked into that story about David Cicilline’s management of Providence’s finances and found little there beyond widespread confusion about the difference between a budget reserve and a cash reserve, along with a collection of city and state officials who all saw political advantage in blaming the recently departed Mayor for problems most of them had a hand in creating.

There was also the matter of a single poorly chosen word by Cicilline who I choose to excuse for that because the cash reserves that got the city through its vicious cuts in state funding were built up under his administration. (Did you think they were a legacy of the Cianci years?)  I might not have used the word “excellent”, but I do think it obvious that only a city in good financial shape could have gotten through the “Category 5” fiscal storm created by those aid cuts in 2008, 2009, and 2010.

What’s more incredible to me is that all the criticism revolves around the claim that Mayor Cicilline should have raised taxes sooner and farther, the “hard choices” recommended by former Carcieri aide Gary Sasse who was commissioned by the City Council to write a report about the issue. I’m certainly not going to defend every decision Cicilline ever made, but people who imagine his mandate did not involve holding the line on property taxes by any means at hand are apparently living on a different planet than me. He held taxes down, and now gets blame for that?  The fact remains that David Cicilline has been tarred far beyond his share in order that the people actually responsible for Providence’s troubles can evade blame.

We’ve seen this show before

 What’s going on here is only slightly different than the way the mainstream press invented all the narratives about Al Gore’s “lies” in 1999 and 2000, and then allowed George Bush and the partisan media to take advantage of them. You know the list, about the internet, Love Story, Love Canal, and all the rest. Each of those was an invention of writers at the New York Times, the Washington Post, and the Associated Press. All the Bush campaign had to do was gently pile on, which they happily did.

In almost exactly the same way, what’s happened here is that reporters have taken claims by interested parties — Providence City Council members, General Assembly insiders, ex-Governors and members of their staff — at face value, and helped invent a narrative about a dishonest Cicilline. These were all people who played a part in Providence’s fiscal nightmare, but by deflecting blame to the former Mayor, they can avoid it themselves. Anthony Gemma has been astute and unprincipled enough to see that he could profit by buttressing that narrative.

Why is that unprincipled?  Consider the claim that Gemma cares one wit about the nation’s economy, the state’s jobless, Social Security, the air we breathe, the availability and cost of health care (including abortion and contraception), and all the other actual issues in question during this election. Gemma claims to hold views about these issues in direct opposition to the national Republican party, whose well-funded representative the winner of next week’s primary will face.

There’s a balancing test here. On the one hand, Gemma might actually care about the issues before Congress more than he cares about further damaging David Cicilline’s reputation and future. He might think that taking a step towards a more rational and affordable health care system is more important than what appears to be his own irrational hatred of Cicilline. On the other hand, he might not. The evidence of his actions says he cares more about the personal than the policy, and that, it seems to me, is the very definition of unprincipled.

Access to Higher Education


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Almost three months ago, our nation celebrated the 40th anniversary of the establishment of Pell Grants, a program that has opened the doors of higher education to more than 60 million students. Speaking on the Senate floor the day legislation establishing the program was signed by President Richard Nixon, our state’s own Senator Claiborne Pell said “I have worked on this specific legislation for three years. To have it signed into law and know that in the future, higher education will be available to so many more people, is a most gratifying event.”

Senator Pell’s vision and hard work more than four decades ago ensured that generations of Americans could attend college and avoid worrying about being saddled with loans. Today, as the cost of higher education continues to rise, we need to follow Senator Pell’s example to ensure that Rhode Island families can afford to send their children to college.

During my first term in Congress, I have fought to maintain our investments in Pell Grants and higher education. I also worked hard to ensure Congress passed legislation that would prevent the student loan interest rate from doubling. Already this legislation has ensured that more than 7 million students, including more than 43,000 Rhode Islanders, did not incur an additional $6.3 billion in student loan repayment costs this academic year.

Unfortunately, at this critical moment for America’s students, many of my Republican colleagues in the United States Congress have proposed budgets and policies that would further hurt Rhode Island’s young people. For example, the Republican budget proposal introduced by Representative Paul Ryan (R-WI) would have cut approximately $166 billion from student loans and Pell Grants over ten years. The Ryan budget’s insistence on squeezing middle class families and imposing additional financial burdens on students is wrong and it doesn’t reflect our nation’s values and I have been proud to fight against it – as I mentioned during a meeting last April with students at Roger Williams University.

Representative Ryan’s plan would change eligibility requirements for Pell Grants, so that fewer middle class American families would qualify. Shifting money away from Pell Grants would force students who are already under a heavy debt burden to take out additional loans. And yet, after forcing students to take on more loans, Representative Ryan and the Republican leadership repeatedly indicated they were willing to allow subsidized Stafford student loan interest rates to double.

That’s why I spoke out on the House floor last spring to urge consideration of H.R. 3826, a bill that I co-sponsored, in order to prevent student loan interest rates from doubling.  And a few weeks later, I hosted a call to action at Rhode Island College with area students, parents, and business leaders to rally support and awareness about this issue.  I was delighted when Congress finally reached an agreement to extend low-interest student loans for an additional year.

It’s clear that Republicans and Democrats need to continue to work together bring tuition costs under control.  According to the National Center for Education Statistics, in the decade between 2000 and 2010, the price for undergraduate tuition, room, and board at public colleges and universities rose by 37% and at private colleges and universities by 25%.

In real numbers, that has meant an average of $4,000 more money per year for tuition when adjusted for inflation in just the last 10 years. Higher education is quickly becoming unaffordable at just the moment when we need to work even harder to ensure young people have the skills to compete in a rapidly changing 21st century global economy.

As you may know, earlier this year, President Obama proposed tying eligibility for federal aid programs to colleges and universities ability to demonstrate the ways in which they are making tuition more affordable. While we work to protect investments in higher education, I agree that we need to ensure beneficiaries are held accountable and are working hard to cut the cost of tuition for students. Senator Pell advocated for a funding model that was not based purely on enrollment but also on performance, student outcomes and degree completion.

Cutting the costs of tuition for families, however, should not mean a lower quality education for students. The approach should be multifaceted. We should continue to study ways we can use new technology and other innovative delivery models to drive down the cost of education. But we should also make sure students are informed about their options. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is in the process of completing a project that will mandate side-by-side comparisons of the costs associated with the decision to attend individual colleges so they can make informed choices and spur competition.

There is little doubt that the financial burdens associated with higher education being faced by too many Rhode Island families are real. In memory of the late Senator Pell, we need to roll up our sleeves and work together to lower the cost of higher education so that future generations of Rhode Islanders can acquire the skills they need to succeed.

Poor Edumacation In CD1 Democratic Debate


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Education. We spend a lot of time arguing about this. Wave after wave of education reformer has appeared, each with their own unique (and often uniquely wrong) method of “solving” education. And boy, if you cared at all education issues, the CD1 Democratic debate was not your night.

Public Schools

The Journal‘s Edward Achorn asked a leading question about supplying school vouchers. Thankfully, neither David Cicilline or Anthony Gemma support those. But if you thought Democrats were staunch defenders of public schools, you might be asking yourself if you could get some new defenders.

Gemma Says Providence Public School Grads Are Stupid

This had to be the point when I, personally, wanted to strangle Mr. Gemma, because he wasn’t just attacking Mr. Cicilline (I don’t particularly care about that), he was attacking me and my friends. He attacked pretty much anyone who passed through Providence Schools from the years of 2003 and 2010. Actually, RI Future contributor Steve Ahlquist has the best line on this, so let me quote his tweet:

#WPRIdebate Gemma says my kids were failed by Providence School system. I’ll call my daughter at Cornell, break the news to her.

— steveahlquist (@steveahlquist) August 29, 2012

Full disclosure, I attended the same schools as Mr. Ahlquist’s daughter for 12 years. Unlike Mr. Gemma’s descriptions of us, we can, in fact, “read and write and do math” and are not in need of adult education. A great many Providence school grads are, contrary to the rumors produced by the haters, “productive members of society.” In fact, I can do statistical analysis, and my writing skills are on display here, and I’ve graduated from a four-year college in four years. Actually, from the time I graduated high school in the fifth year of Mr. Cicilline’s term, to 2010, four year high school graduation rates in Providence were higher by 10 percentage points (increasing from 58% to 68%). What probably keeps Providence grads from being even more productive members of society is the lack of jobs.

No one from this school could possibly aspire to be Mayor of Providence or Governor of Rhode Island.

But the big problems with Mr. Gemma’s statements are that he over-relies on testing data, which is a crappy way of measuring education success. Kristina Rizga, of Mother Jones, recently published an article entitled “Everything You’ve Heard About Failing Schools Is Wrong“. In it she discusses just how distorting testing data is. And just how detrimental it is to good schools that people love. Her key line about getting good information other than testing data about how schools are doing: “It’s easier for a journalist to embed with the Army or the Marines than to go behind the scenes at a public school.”

And then, while trying to blame Mr. Cicilline for Providence’s problems, Mr. Gemma notes the issue is across the urban core. So either Mr. Cicilline is part of a trend of RI’s urban areas doing poorly on tests (speaking to structural/environmental issues), or he’s responsible for all of the urban areas doing poorly. I’d say the biggest problem with Mr. Cicilline’s tenure over my schools is that the department would hire a bunch of people who aren’t in the schools but seem to have all the answers to show up for like two years, and then leave when a higher paying job opens up. No one deigns to ask the students what’s going wrong. And here’s the thing, students have identified all the problems in the day-to-day operation of their schools. They know just what’s going wrong for them. No one in power is asking teachers what problems they’re having (other teachers are).

Hopefully the collaboration between the teachers’ union and the administration in Providence will yield some results. If they engaged the students via any one (but hopefully all) of the great student organizations in Providence, the schools would probably see incredible improvements.

Cicilline Says Kids Need to Compete

A couple of masters in engineering help a lady out.

I hear this a lot, George W. Bush said it as he inaugurated No Child Left Behind, tons of people talk about the need for children to compete. And it’s stupid. Look, if you want future American workers to be competitive with kids in India and China, educating them more is not the way to go. Notice how no one ever says we have to have our compete with top-ranked nations for education like Finland or South Korea. It’s always Mexico, Indonesia, and China we have to struggle against. That’s because the most competitive workers are the ones who don’t know any better.

I mean, what’s the cheapest worker? A slave or a serf. No one ever heard a slave owner or a feudal lord go, “man, if only my peons were more educated. Then they’d be more competitive.” No. It was “keep those books away from them. If they get too knowledgeable, they won’t know their place. No one wants to purchase an unruly worker.”

We used to understand this (ironically, back when there was actual slavery in this country’s living memory). We didn’t put public schools in place to produce workers. Horace Mann, the father of our public school system, wanted good American citizens. That’s the purpose of public education; to provide intelligent citizens. You know what doesn’t produce good citizens? Testing that demands that kids only know rote writing, reading, and math; and teaching that only supplies that. You want competitive workers, privatize and revert back to the past when only the wealthy got education. Then you’ll get people who don’t know any better but to take bad jobs at terrible wages.

You want good citizens who will build a strong America? Teach them how to think and question and argue and study. Teach them history and literature and philosophy and government and economics and science. Teach them how to be people, and not drones.

College Costs

Are you in debt? Yes? For that college education you got? Still? You mean, you didn’t graduate college and get that $40,000 a year job your college told you their average grad makes a year out of college? Weird. It’s almost like there’s terrible unemployment or something, and government no longer cares about full employment. Well, you can always go bankrupt. What? You can’t discharge your debt with bankruptcy? Good luck with that. When WPRI’s Ted Nesi asked this question to the candidates, they weren’t much help to the college student/graduate (full disclosure: I graduated college in debt).

Cicilline: Boy, That’s a Big Challenge

Damn right it is; college is where they teach both rocket science and brain surgery. Mr. Cicilline sure noted it was difficult, it would absolutely get more difficult much faster under Republican proposals, but he seemed mightily befuddled about how to solve the fact that over the last 30 years, the cost of college has risen 1120%. I suppose it’s worth noting that in 1980, Pell Grants covered 69% of a four-year, public university degree. In 2013, they’ll cover less than a third, a level of coverage that is the “lowest in history.” This despite their maximum amount being increased. Mr. Cicilline’s “that’s a difficult question, let’s have a conversation about this” approach doesn’t seem to me to signal the correct response to the immediacy of this problem. We could’ve talked about this in the late ’80s or early ’90s when the costs outstripped the Consumer Price Index. We should’ve been marshaling solutions in the early 2000s when it broke a 500% increase from 20 years before. But in 2012, we gotta say, “enough is enough, college costs are going to come down.” If that’s more government investment, or government interference, or a debt jubilee, or whatever, it doesn’t matter. By any means necessary, we cannot have colleges creating a new cohort of debtors every year. Frankly, a college education is not worth the amount we are paying for it.

Harvard is well known for being frugal with its money.

Gemma: Race to the Top!

Faced with this, Mr. Gemma could only go with “benchmarking against other institutions.” When Mr. Nesi pointed out that Harvard University is the top ranked college in the world, and its costs are ludicrously high, Mr. Gemma said something like, “well, benchmark against savings on paper goods.” Paper goods. Seriously. You know where we could save a ton of money on a paper good? Ending the cartel of book publishers which keep textbooks outrageously high (your seventeenth edition of Econ 101 is not worth $500, by any measure).

Mr. Gemma pointed out Race to the Top as an example of a way to benchmark. Now, all due respect to President Obama, but Race to the Top is George W. Bush’s No Child Left Behind-lite. It’s privatize, privatize, privatize. And private colleges are the ones that are really getting outrageously expensive, as the amount (and salaries) of administrative positions bloat budgets and colleges focus on amenities rather than professors to attract wealthy students. And that’s not to even get into for-profit colleges, which offer often fraudulent degrees at prices far above any other higher education institutions. So in the face of increased costs from the private sector, Mr. Gemma would look to the private sector for solutions on cutting costs?


Claiborne Pell, we need you now, more than ever.

Gemma-Cicilline Debate: The Crowd Has No Rules


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Cicilline Interviewed At WPRI Debate
Cicilline Interviewed At WPRI Debate
Rep. David Cicilline cracks a smile as he takes questions from the press.

This debate was a pissing-match. But not between the candidates. Rather, their supporters, gathered together in a room, attempted to dominate one another by shouting out “liar” when either candidate spoke, booing, chanting their candidate’s name, etc.

For those sitting in the room trying to listen, it made for an unpleasant evening trying to hear their candidates over the shouting. I gather that at home, it was a more enjoyable experience (if you find debates enjoyable).

I question the decision (I assume by The Journal) to put Edward Achorn on the panel, which seems to be the wrong kind of person to put on a Democratic Party debate. Perhaps a Democrat might’ve been better suited to ask Democrats questions. That said, I can see the other side, which is that any Democrat would’ve been compromised in their support, and a right-winger is unlikely to care either way (personally, I think there are enough disaffected Democrats who dislike both candidates to find one willing to ask fair questions).

David Cicilline won this debate, but not as strongly as he should’ve. Without the hour spread out over four candidates, Anthony Gemma was without a doubt an opposition candidate. But not an ideal one. Mr. Gemma was unable to name a single policy or vote of Mr. Cicilline’s that he would’ve done differently, nor was he able to remember the name of a Republican he admired (someone from Texas who does legislation around breast cancer).

Interestingly, Mr. Gemma’s most forceful attack on Mr. Cicilline’s time as Mayor of Providence appeared to be attacking the stewardship of the education system. He also proposed that a program similar to “Race to the Top” be instituted to reduce higher education costs. He was short on specifics, but so was Mr. Cicilline, who said it was a difficult issue.

There were a couple of questions that seemed like neither candidate did well. For instance, when asked about what specifically they would cut, neither candidate came out in favor of massive defense spending cuts; even though a May 2012 poll by the Program for Public Consultation found that on average, 76% of Americans favored a 23% defense spending cut. Mr. Cicilline made a decent point about tax expenditures being spending rather than revenue, but he wasn’t able to name a specific tax expenditure other than the 40 billion in oil tax credits.

Both candidates seemed not too far apart on Iran (do everything possible to prevent war, then go to war). It would’ve been nice if a discussion of Syria had come up, since that conflict doesn’t offer the easy answer of “we have to stop nuclear weapons proliferation.” A real divisive issue was the USPS. Mr. Gemma took the businessman strategy: “streamline” the agency, and cut Saturday service. Mr. Cicilline attacked the laws that force the USPS to pre-fund their pension system, which puts it at a disadvantage with its private-sector competitors.

Oddly, a question on extending the terms of U.S. Representatives raised two viewpoints which were completely valid. Mr. Gemma chose the term-limits argument (cribbing from Bill Lynch’s playbook from the 2010 primary). Mr. Cicilline chose the campaign finance reform argument. Mr. Gemma’s viewpoint aligns with that of Jack Abramoff, who recommends it as a way to prevent the kind of corruption he was convicted as. And campaign finance reform was a bipartisan solution up until the moment Republicans decided they didn’t like it (plus it’s the right thing to do). Mr. Cicilline said exactly the right line in talking about this: “corporations are not people.” Mr. Gemma wasn’t as convincing trying to thread the needle on the need for term limits, yet acknowledging the implication is that good Congress people will be thrown out.

In fairness to Mr. Gemma, I thought it was wrong of the moderator Tim White to push on him for making RI-specific proposals that seem irrelevant to the U.S. House when one question asked specifically about who in the state deserves blame for 38 Studios (neither candidate blamed anyone specific), and another asked to grade Lincoln Chafee for no apparent reason (Mr. Cicilline refused to answer saying he wouldn’t grade anyone he had a working relationship with, Mr. Gemma said “C”). That said, Mr. Gemma does need to be pushed on it, because it’s stupid.

Finally voter fraud. For the crowd, this was the issue to intervene in. There isn’t much to say here. Either you believe Mr. Gemma or you think he’s a liar. Moderator Tim White eventually cut Mr. Gemma’s explanation of the issue short, saying that Mr. Gemma was still failing to provide actual evidence. We learned that Mr. Gemma has spent about $40,000 in campaign cash on his investigation of Mr. Cicilline. Mr. Cicilline eventually waggled his finger in Mr. Gemma’s face, saying that Mr. Gemma was not focusing on the correct issue at hand, instead talking about people holed up in their attics.

And that’s ultimately where the candidates differed. Mr. Cicilline returned numerous times to arguing against the Republican plan for America. Mr. Gemma remained focused on voter fraud and conspiratorial election-rigging, neglecting the Providence attack line that really worries voters, and makes even Mr. Cicilline’s supporters worried about his prospects in November.

But Mr. Cicilline never turned Mr. Gemma’s own talking points against him; he never said something like “how can Mr. Gemma talk about trust and integrity when he’s lying to Rhode Islanders about voter fraud and inflating his social media presence?”

Perhaps that was intentional; Mr. Cicilline’s focus on defeating the Republican Party led to two moments where he trumped Mr. Gemma. Mr. Cicilline would remain loyal to the Democratic candidate, even if his opponent who had so smeared him won; and Mr. Cicilline also admired the respect and honor Mr. Gemma has shown to his mother through the Gloria Gemma Foundation. In comparison, Mr. Gemma only like Mr. Cicilline’s tie, and would not vote for Mr. Cicilline.

I think the WPRI poll was more important to the coverage of this race than this debate.

Notes:

  • No handshake between the candidates.
  • Sorry I only got a picture of Mr. Cicilline. Mr. Gemma left before I could snap a photo with my iPhone camera.
  • I hope that the WPRI employee who was carried off the stage is okay.

Gemma’s Jobs Plan Isn’t Right for Rhode Island


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Anthony Gemma

Anthony GemmaIn a world where self-described “leaders” show their “leadership” largely by describing it in press releases, and politicians routinely praise their own bold choices, it is refreshing to see one who actually lives up to his own billing.

Anthony Gemma, on the other hand, has a jobs plan that is indeed as “innovative, strategic, and transparent” as he says. Unfortunately it’s also silly, misguided, and occasionally bizarre. (And hard to find.  Go look on his home page and wait until you see “Enough is enough” and click on that.)

The centerpiece of his plan is to nurture the growth of the “wellness” industry in Rhode Island. This includes businesses who produce dietary supplements and organic foods, as well as “wellness jobs that include personal trainers, aerobics and pilates instructors, managers, researchers, Web site designers, wellness and fitness writers, and dietitians.”

Well all right, then. Maybe it sounds goofy, but could it work?

Sadly, probably not. Here’s a little economics lesson for you. What Rhode Island sorely needs is not goods and services to sell to other Rhode Islanders, but things to sell to the rest of the nation or the rest of the world. Do we currently suffer from a shortage of Pilates instructors?  Are there aerobics classes that can’t run because no instructor can be hired?  If we had more personal trainers could we sell them to people in Kentucky or India?  These are services that are not in short supply, and are really no good for export, either.

Ok, how about the nutritional supplement part of the mix?  This would presumably trade on our lack of strength in this sector. So far as I can tell, as far as nutrition companies go, Rhode Island is home only to Edesia Global Nutrition Solutions, an international effort aimed at distributing nutritional supplements to starving kids. Edesia is a very cool organization, and sells teddy bears to support its mission. Though I can imagine it could be the seed for a thriving food industry here, it’s not exactly what Gemma was talking about. (Read about them here.)

So in other words, Gemma is proposing to grow an industry where what we have can’t be exported and what can be exported, we don’t have. Leveraging assets we don’t have seems an interesting approach to economic development. So you have to award points for originality, in exactly the same way you’d praise the architect who envisions a fountain in the desert before anyone has dug the first well.  Exactly like that.

Bettering that, Gemma proposes that we encourage the Mayo Clinic or Tufts Medical to open wellness clinics here. This, of course, would be the opposite of exporting goods. Instead of bringing money into the state, we’d be sending it away, to Minnesota or Massachusetts to provide services that we can get in-state. This, again, is why success in business means little or nothing about success in making policy to benefit a whole state.

Too late, too little

There’s a section in this plan talking about how higher education should be demand-driven and responsive to the needs of businesses and students. That’s a great idea. So great, it was pretty much incorporated into the “CCRI 21st Century Workforce Commission” report from a couple of years ago. (Gemma also suggests asking the state’s 7 biggest employers for $250,000 apiece to shore up education at CCRI. Which is a funny thought: we can’t raise taxes on businesses, but we can demand contributions from them?)

Along the same lines, there’s a four item list on page 9, that describes what the state should do to encourage the growth of the wellness industry. What’s funny about the list is that the first three items on it — tax credits, loans, assistance finding federal money — are all things the state already does. So yes, these are good ideas. So good that someone already implemented them.

And then there’s this:

“It is incumbent upon us to eliminate the over-regulation of the small businesses which are the engines that drive the Rhode Island economy. I will create a workgroup to review all federal and state regulations that hinder wellness and health-oriented businesses…” [p.8]

This, presumably, would join the Secretary of State’s workgroup, and the legislative commissions and the Governor’s initiatives of years past. Courtesy of the Secretary of State’s office, this work is under way, and it’s hard to find anyone to disagree with the claim.

Honestly, you don’t have to find disagreement to understand why these things — streamlining, increased efficiencies, and so on — often don’t get done. People who crave simple answers will blame unions and fear of change, but it’s pretty easy to find deeper reasons.

In my experience, you can walk around any town hall or state building and find people who agree that there are efficiencies available, but don’t have the resources to re-tool their department’s operations. “Doing more with less” year after year leaves little room for designing new procedures or implenting new systems. When you walk into a tax assessor’s office and find the assessor trying to finish reports that her staff used to prepare, you’ve found someone who can’t afford to research or entertain new possibilities about the conduct of her department’s business. For better and worse, that’s how we run things these days. Studies and commissions are all well and good, but change requires resources, even when the change makes things more efficient. You’ve got to put something in to get more out.

So that’s what I learned by reading the Gemma Jobs plan: he suggests concentrating on a new industry that has approximately zero potential to bring new money into the state, and offers a bunch of other suggestions that are already in place. What’s more, almost all of his plan consists of state policy suggestions, while the last time I checked, he is running for federal office.

There’s plenty more, but I’ve piled on enough.  Ok, sorry, one thing more. I have to share my favorite part. It’s a tax incentive on page 9, for people who get hired in the wellness industry. Seriously. Gemma would offer a tax credit to new employees. Really?  Does he imagine that unemployed people need a tax incentive to help them find jobs? That would be the sound of the fountain designer who has finally been persuaded to help dig a well and shows up to work with a butterfly net.

So sure. Gemma is a smart energetic guy who has done good things in the past, and doubtless will again in the future. I just don’t want a congressman with judgment like this. His jobs plan is certainly “innovative, strategic, and transparent” as he says. But is there no place for “practical,” “sensible,” or “realistic?”

Progress Report: Custodial Politics in NK, Cicilline Raises More Money, Voter ID Laws Hurt More than They Help


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Nothing riles up the suburbs quite like when local leaders threaten to outsource the janitorial staff at the schools, and such seems the case in North Kingstown where 26 custodians are in danger of losing their jobs to privatization. Don’t believe me? Just check out the comments on North Kingstown Patch this morning: one side claims the unions have finally gotten their just desserts, while the other pleads for the working class people whose lives could be forever affected.

But there is more than just an emotional argument to be made for the custodians – and keeping their jobs in-house has an economic benefit, as well. Privatization rarely proves cheaper in the long run, even though the companies that compete in this market often offer sweetheart deals in the first few contracts … but if school committee members don’t like negotiating with organized labor, wait ’till they have to sit across the table from a big, out-of-state corporation that has no interest in North Kingstown other than how much money it can extract from the community. The School Committee would be wise to give this idea a second thought … perhaps the rally tonight at 6pm outside the district headquarters will give them reason to.

Congressman David Cicilline is raising more money than his Republican challenger, reports Ted Nesi … but Brendan Doherty could likely get enough SuperPAC money to offset Cicilline’s advantage on the ground. This isn’t all bad news for ex-mayor … whatever misgivings Rhode Islanders have about how Cicilline left Providence could easily be usurped by our disdain of seeing Corporate America try to influence the outcome of a local race.

Maryellen Butke is stepping down from her position with RI-CAN, a group that uses corporate money to lobby for more charter schools in Rhode Island.

According to an Associated Press study of voter ID laws in Indiana and Georgia, the controversial law may well suppress more votes than they protect. “The numbers suggest that the legitimate votes rejected by the laws are far more numerous than are the cases of fraud that advocates of the rules say they are trying to prevent. Thousands more votes could be in jeopardy for this November, when more states with larger populations are looking to have similar rules in place.”

 

Anthony Gemma Should Stay In CD1 Race


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Anthony Gemma

Anthony GemmaI’m going to go out on a limb here and argue against our editor Bob Plain’s article that Anthony Gemma should drop out of the race for Democratic nominee for Congressional District 1. Now, obviously, it’s not because I have any particular love for Mr. Gemma. It’s because I’m a radical democrat.

I believe in the application of democracy, that our ideas and politicians have to be challenged in order to strengthen them. Representative David Cicilline shouldn’t get a free ride (though, obviously, no one can really accuse him of that since Providence Mayor Angel Taveras announced a “category 5 hurricane” about the city’s finances). I think that, regardless of how much I personally feel that between Mr. Cicilline and Mr. Gemma that Mr. Cicilline is clearly the better candidate, Mr. Gemma needs to stay in the race.

This should apply to everyone. In our democracy, it’s a shame that anyone ever stands in any election unchallenged. I’m not deaf to the idea that sometimes the best candidate is already in office, but I sincerely doubt it always applies. Everyone needs to be capable of defending their ideas; those who don’t tend to get sloppy. Even worse, they can get entitled. Mr. Cicilline clearly never got the chance to feel entitled to his seat; when Mr. Taveras made his now famous remarks as to the city’s financial condition, the uphill battle began. Everyday since then has been a justification of why Mr. Cicilline should remain in office. That‘s a good thing. These telephone town halls, while pretty ubiquitous, have been a departure from Patrick Kennedy’s tenure when the representative was… someplace, talking to some people.

Mr. Gemma serves a purpose; to ask the question “can Mr. Cicilline serve as the Democratic Party’s standard-bearer for Representative in RI CD-1?” However terrible an instrument Mr. Gemma is for that purpose, we’ll know the answer on September 11th.

This principle should’ve extended to the Republican race as well. John Loughlin II dropping out was bad for Rhode Island. It denied Republicans the chance to vet their candidate. Hopefully, Michael Donahue can fill Mr. Loughlin’s shoes; although I sincerely doubt he will, with the twin issues of a dislike of lawyers & law enforcement and the Federal Reserve and a likely resources and media coverage deficit.

Today being filing day, it’s important that those who can go out and do as Rep. Teresa Tanzi (D-Narragansett, Peace Dale, Wakefield) told the audience to do at Netroots Nation: run for office. To make democracy work, we have to run, no matter how impossible the task seems.

That said, I want to lay out the problems to this. First, and foremost, it’s an incredible drain on resources; financial, physical, and emotional. People burn out, or they go bankrupt. Politics is exceedingly expensive. In a perfect world, we’d have public financing and everyone would work with similar resources. But the U.S. Supreme Court seems to be against that, so we have to deal with the fact that our elections are going to become more and more oligarchical. I don’t have the solution to that.

There’s also the grueling personal attacks. I’d love it if political campaigns were cordial affairs (what if candidates campaigned together?), but I recognize that they’re not. And the result is that they can be bitter, wounding attacks. This is because it’s far simpler to make personal attacks, because people connect more easily with emotional appeals, and because we have a news media which rewards the personal attack with coverage and a general blasé attitude. We shouldn’t deny it; the first hardcore “issues” article I read about the CD1 campaign was the Progressive Democrats presentations/questionnaires that both Mr. Cicilline and Mr. Gemma went through. And I’m jealous of our former editor Brian Hull (and the Progressive Dems) for getting it.

Furthermore, more and more candidates in a single race means our first-past-the-post system reveals its inherent flaw: it doesn’t take a majority to win. You only have the win the largest plurality. Which means elections can end with a candidate the majority of people actually don’t like winning. A simple reform would be to switch to instant runoff voting, but it’ll take a sustained campaign and a real threat that the RI Democratic Party might lose its grip for that switch to happen.

But even without changes in how we organize elections and how we cover them, we need candidates to be brave enough to stand up and speak out for what they believe in. We need them to argue with whatever assumptions currently stand; with the consensus. The consensus shouldn’t get to rest on its laurels, it should constantly have to strive to prove its worth. Ideally, Rhode Island should thrive on this sort of idea.

In some places, there’s an option for “none of the above”. Voters can reject all the candidates by selecting it; and it means that a new election is called with new candidates. Perhaps that’d be a more honest way of doing this; giving voters the chance to say “all of these options are unappealing to me.” But until that comes along, that’s what Anthony Gemma will be: an alternative to “none of the above”.

Anthony Gemma Should Drop Out of CD1 Race


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Anthony Gemma

Anthony GemmaThe campaign to represent Rhode Island’s first congressional district in Washington DC will surely be the most interesting and scrutinized local race this year and, so far, there is only one thing that is certain: Anthony Gemma won’t win.

He could, however, potentially damage David Cicilline enough in an ugly primary to leave the incumbent vulnerable to the real challenger, Republican Brendan Doherty. But he won’t win. Not even the primary. No way. Not gonna happen. No chance.

First off, Gemma has absolutely no institutional support, which is crucial in a primary. At Friday’s annual local Democratic Convention, his nomination didn’t even garner a second, reports Will Collette in an excellent piece on the event in Progressive Charlestown. Collette writes:

When it came time for nominations, one delegate, who said she grew up as a friend of Gemma’s back in the day, stood to put his name in nomination. When Party Chair Ed Pachecho asked, not once but three times, if  any delegate would second the nomination, not one delegate among the 200+ would do so.

That leaves me to wonder how Gemma can claim to be the only electable Democrat for the First Congressional District when he can’t organize up a second to his nomination among 200+ Democrats. His supporters yelled out “democracy, democracy” when his nomination failed for lack of a second, but minutes later, they all filed out of the room.

But it’s more than just Gemma’s lack of support that makes him a bad candidate; he’s also just a bad candidate.

Last election, as a rookie, he ran as a pro-business fiscal moderate and this time he is claiming to be more progressive than his very progressive opponent – it paints the picture of a flip-flopper politically and at best an unknown variable on policy given that he’s never held office before, or even shown much interest in the process until a few years ago.

He’s also a pretty poor public speaker, a disaster at dealing with the local press pool and far less than adroit at answering questions on his feet. His latest gaffe was not taking a hardline on Nazi Germany in a recent interview with the RI Progressive Democrats.

Note to all pols: when asked about Hitler or the Nazis, it’s totally okay – if not a necessity of political survival, to throw them under the bus.

For these reasons as well as many others, we implore Anthony Gemma to drop out of the race. He cannot win; he can only do damage to the party he says he supports and, truth be told, he’s kind of embarrassing himself.

Which is too bad, because Gemma is a smart, super hard worker who is genuine and good and who wants to do right by his community. Electoral politics just doesn’t seem to be his bag.

I expect he’ll find more far more success if and when he starts some sort of local liberal think tank or online media venture – either would suit his skill set better than running for office, probably would have a greater impact on Rhode Island and could be done for a fraction of the cost. And, he’d get to be a hero rather than a spoiler.

RI Progressive Dems Endorse Cicilline


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Recently, the Rhode Island Progressive Democrats interviewed both of the candidates running in the Congressional District 1 Democratic primary race, incumbent Rep. David Cicilline and challenger Anthony Gemma.  Each candidate was asked the same questions and below are their video responses.  When the endorsement vote was taken, David Cicilline received the unanimous endorsement of the Rhode Island Progressive Democrats.  As you watch the videos, and read the summaries, you’ll understand why.

Cicilline is a well-polished candidate, being in public service for roughly 15 years, first as a State Representative, then Mayor of Providence, and now as U.S. Congressman.  Gemma is not as well-polished and at times seems uncomfortable with the questions being asked.  While in some of the questions Gemma and Cicilline give similar and even identical responses. In virtually every set of questions Cicilline is the more progressive and forward-thinking candidate.

I commend the Rhode Island Progressive Democrats for the level of sophistication and detail embodied in these questions and  for really pushing the candidates to give detailed answers.  And with that….

Economy:

Cicilline:

Rep. Cicilline supports President Obama’s Jobs Act.  He states that America needs to rebuild its infrastructure and asserts that such an  effort will generate huge payoffs in the number of jobs due to the employment of construction workers and in the supply of goods and services that are required to rebuild America.  He envisions a modern day version of the WPA.  He has co-sponsored the National Infrastructure Bank legislation and feels there has never been a better time than now to borrow money and get this done due to historically low rates.

Secondly, the country needs to reinvigorate American manufacturing and expand on the great base that exists in the US by putting in place policies that actually support the manufacture of American-made goods rather than incentivizing the offshoring of American manufacturing overseas.  In Congress he has introduced a set of bills to “Make it in America.”  These include a national manufacturing strategy, legislation to address the manipulation of Chinese currency, and ending tax break to companies that ship jobs overseas.  Cicilline voted against trade agreements because they lacked the protections for American jobs, and while some labor- intensive manufacturing will never come back to America, many other types will return if the incentives to ship jobs overseas are removed.

Finally, the country’s small businesses need access to capital and a skilled workforce which require investments in training programs and education from Head Start through to Pell grants for post-secondary education.

To pay for much of this, the country needs to end the war in Afghanistan and redirect those funds to do “nation building” in America.  Business owners need customers with money to buy the goods and services that businesses produce, and the only way this will happen is with a strong and thriving middle class.

When asked about Stimulus Spending versus Deficit Reduction, Cicilline spoke to how austerity has severe consequences that are now playing themselves out everywhere.  In the short term, we need to make investments now to create jobs, combined with a long-term strategy to reduce the deficit in a balanced way by cutting spending and increasing revenue.  He also supports Quantitative Easing.

Gemma:

Gemma states that he is the only candidate who has created jobs in the private sector.  His jobs plan rests on several “pillars” including:

  • “Health and Wellness” industry: A high growth area in RI that includes the manufacturing of equipment and supplements.
  • “Education” as a path to creating jobs by increasing enrollment at the universities although he is unclear as to how he would convince the respective colleges to take in more students, admitting that he has not approached any of the colleges to discuss this aspect of his plan.  Students spend lots of money locally, so having more students enrolled should equal more money spent locally.
  • Alternative energy and green industry
  • Advanced manufacturing
  • Travel and tourism
  • Infrastructure

Gemma states that his plan will create at least 10,000 jobs in RI over five years at the low end, but he thinks it could be as high as 30-40,000 jobs.  He also assumes that much of the funding will come from foundations and private money since Congress is resolute in not investing in job creation.  Many of his proposals assume things that may not actually be possible however, such as increasing enrollment at Brown University by 10,000 students, and not contacting Brown University about this.

When asked about Stimulus Spending versus Deficit Reduction, Gemma’s #1 priority would be to reduce the deficit, using a balanced approach of tax increases and earned benefit cuts.  When asked about Quantitative Easing, he said it is ok, although he is concerned about the inflationary effects of printing more money (although inflation is at super low rates).

Healthcare:

Cicilline:

Cicilline believes that everyone should have access to quality, affordable healthcare and references a public option and a single payer system as models that would ensure affordability and access.  The healthcare reform legislation includes components of a good system: enabling children to stay on parents’ plan until 27, no denial of pre-existing condition or monetary caps, etc.  The cost of healthcare, while important, is a systems question not a provision question.  In order to lower costs, however, the system should be able to negotiate prices with drug companies like the VA system can, and there should be investments in wellness and technology.  America cannot reduce the level of care and must ensure that everyone has access.  We pay for universal care now due to emergency room visits, but there is a much less expensive way to handle this through universal coverage.

Gemma:

Everyone should have HC, but affordability is the biggest issue.  As President of Gem Plumbing, insurance premium rates were growing rapidly, so he created a program call Benefits by Design that incentivized employees to be healthier and engage in preventative measures.  The current HC system is lacking in preventative measures.  We should incentivize people to be healthier and take responsibility for their own health. Gemma did not endorse a single payer system, although he states that he would have voted for healthcare reform and the public option had he been in Congress at the time.

Education:

Cicilline:

We need to be serious about investments in early childhood education as they are the best investments in children we can make in terms of educational outcomes.  We expend a lot more later on for remediation because of our failure to spend enough on the early years.  Invest early for every child in the country to maximize the return on investment for children’s learning.

Build a system that cares for children from when they wake up to when they go to sleep. They need a learning environment created to provide learning experiences outside of school.  Look at AfterZone and the PASA.  Kids need the support, especially those in households in which both parents are working, or parents are working multiple jobs, etc.

Charter schools have some great examples, but the innovative ideas are not being transplanted to the public school system, nor are charters held to the same standards.  Different learning environments are great for children, but the majority of children will be taught in public schools.  We cannot abdicate our public responsibility for teaching children.

Public money should never be spent on the private school system.  Public school choice presumes that parents have the same capacity and information about their child’s education, so the system will likely not work as theorized.  Rather, every public school should offer every child a high quality education.

The funding of school based on property taxes has created segregated school districts where the wealthiest areas have the greatest capacity to invest in their public schools compared to poor neighborhoods.  Ed quality should not be based on zip code.  A state funding system should help remove that inequality.

Gemma:

Every available dollar needs to be invested in public education.  Certain cities have failed their students and multiple generations due to underperforming school system.  Re-educate adults who cannot read and write and make them more productive members of society.  He believes in school choice for both public and private schools, funded by public money, and is supportive of Head Start and charter schools, claiming there are models that work. He cites the Mayor of Cumberland as a person who has a vision of education with which he agrees, although he doesn’t explain exactly what that means. He is also supportive of equal funding.

Taxation Policy:

Cicilline:

Raise enough revenue to do the things we need to do and those who have benefitted the most from this country should pay a proportionally larger share than those who earn the least.  He supports progressive taxation.  Growing inequality is exacerbated by taxation policy that taxes the wealthy less than other workers.  All income, however it is earned, should be treated equally rather than providing favoring tax rates for hedge fund managers and those who earn income by already having wealth, and taxing other workers at a higher rate.

Cicilline supports a financial transactions tax to limit the destabilizing speculation that occurs in financial markets and has cosponsored two bills to limit oil speculation.  Supports new tax brackets for higher earners.  Supports letting the “Bush Tax Cuts” now the Obama Tax Cuts expire for people earning over $250,000, although he feels there is some legitimate concern about those earning between $250,000 and $1 million that should be acknowledged.

Gemma:

Gemma believes that the tax cuts for those making above $100,000 should expire (this is roughly 20% of the CD1 population), while those making less than $100,000 should see their current tax rates maintained.  Additionally, Gemma feels that those making less than $50,000 should see their taxes decrease.  Capital gains should be divided into two “buckets.”  Bucket 1 = zero cap gains taxes for new business creation that exist for more than 3 years and which create jobs.  Bucket 2 = phased in capital gains taxes to higher pre-Bush tax cut level in order to limit disruption to stock market.  Gemma feels that oil speculation is a major problem, but his response to having a financial transactions tax is unclear.

Foreign Policy:

Cicilline:

Cicilline only supports military actions in foreign nations when it is necessary to protect the national interests and security of the people of America.  He is a strong advocate for ending the war in Afghanistan and did not support military action in Lybia.  Syria is a challenging question due to the slaughter of innocent people and human rights abuses.  America has some moral responsibility to take actions to protect human life, even though we cannot do it everywhere.  Ideally, the US as part of a global coalition, can play a role in preventing these types of abuses.  In the Sudan, the US should play a role, but we have not currently done so.

Drones change the way the military thinks about warfare.  When people went onto the battlefield, limits were placed on interventions.  The depersonalization of drone warfare impacts the frequency of it.  The decision made about when, and against whom, to use drones are difficult to reconcile with basic constitutional tenets.  There needs to be some oversight of President’s kill list so that the people who are targeted are actually intending to do harm to the US, although any system like this would be an imperfect system.  Cicilline opposes indefinite detention and believes the defense budget should be cut.

Gemma:

Gemma does not support interventions in Iraq and Lybia but does support military action in Afghanistan.  Syria is a deep concern, although he feels that we don’t know everything so much of this is speculation.  Gemma feels that military action should be a last resort.  He is opposed to indefinite detention.

Campaign Finance Reform:

Cicilline:

Rep. Cicilline is cosponsor of several bills aimed at reforming the way campaigns are financed.  The Disclose Act requires the identity of donors to Super PACs to be made almost immediately so people know who is behind campaign ads.  Cicilline cosponsored two constitutional amendments to overturn the Citizens United decision and does not believe that corporations are people.  He proposed legislation, the Fair Elections Act, which would create public financing model for campaigns.

Cicilline believes the biggest challenge facing America right now is the funding of elections, and if we want to fix any of the other problems, we’re talking about we need to address how campaigns are funded and by whom.  The influence of big money and secret money devastates our democracy.

Gemma:

Gemma supports an amendment to repeal Citizens United.  Gemma does not accept PAC money and has self-funded much of his campaign.  He believes there should be public funded campaigns so that more people can run.

Environment

Cicilline:

Rep. Cicilline believes that it is critical to protect the EPA so that it can enforce clean water and air regulations, make serious investments in clean renewable energy, and support local farmers.  He is opposed to the Keystone Pipeline, stating the very serious environmental concerns attached to the project, maintains that the jobs numbers are inflated, and that it is unlikely to reduce energy costs.  He points out that Republicans even defeated an amendment to ensure that the oil running through the pipeline would stay in the US.

Cicilline supports reinstating tax credits for renewable energy projects and extending them for longer periods of time so that there is more stability in the funding of long-term renewable energy projects. He suggests that we could eliminate the $40 billion in subsidies to oil companies and invest that money in renewable energy technology.  Cicilline believes that over time it may be possible to phase out nuclear energy if sufficient investments are made in the development of renewable energy technology.

He is skeptical of ethanol subsidies and supports labeling of genetically-modified foods and milk derived from cows injected with Recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone.

Gemma:

Gem Plumbing has invested in sustainable energy and personally, Gemma is passionate about the environment and sustainability.  Gemma believes the Keystone Pipeline project should move forward, as long as it has the correct environmental protections. To lessen burden on foreign oil overseas, he said, the US should import more oil from Canada.  He believes the dirty tar oil may be able to be burned cleaner.

Gemma supports reinstating tax credits for renewable energy projects, ethanol subsidies, and the labeling of genetically modified foods and milk derived from cows injected with Recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone.

Progressive Caucus:

Cicilline:

Rep. Cicilline will remain a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus.

Gemma:

Gemma would join the Congressional Progressive Caucus.


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387