Dazed and Confused – The Fall Warblers


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
BlackpollWarbler
Blackpoll Warbler fueling up for a 3,000 mile non-stop flight to Brazil.

Every autumn our coastal woodlands become flooded with small songbirds migrating south from their breeding habitat throughout New England and Canada.  A large percentage of these birds are warblers from the Family Parulidae.  Most of them look much different in their non-breeding plumages of the fall than they do in their breeding plumage.  This identification challenge prompted the famous ornithologist Roger Tory Petersen to name the section devoted to these birds in his seminal A Field Guide to the Birds – “The Confusing Fall Warblers.”

Yellow-rumped Warbler In Non-breeding Plumage
Yellow-rumped Warbler in non-breeding plumage eating dried bay berries.
Yellow-rumpedWarbler
Yellow-rumped Warbler eating a May Fly in the spring.

This may be why it is not uncommon to see birders wandering around in a haze this time of year as if they just hitched a ride with a Bob Marley cover band on their way to the Ocean Mist.  However, with a just little bit of insight the fog can be lifted.  One of the keys is to focus on body shape and bill shape, which although subtle are different between genera.  While plumages change from season to season, these characteristics do not.

Is this how you feel when trying to identify fall warblers?
Is this how you feel when trying to identify fall warblers?

Another trick is that 75% of these birds are Yellow-rumped Warblers.  Overall these birds are somewhat drab in non-breeding plumage with splashes of yellow on their sides as well as on their rumps.  Uniquely adapted to survive on dry wax myrtle and bay berries, Yellow-rumps stay in RI throughout the fall and winter while most other warblers need to migrate to central and South America in search of food as insects disappear from the north.  I have seen Yellow-rumped Warblers along the dunes at Moonstone Beach in the middle of February.

Black-throatedBlueWarbler
Black-throated Blue Warblers eat the human equivalent of twenty cheeseburgers a day in preparation for migration.
amre-8596-c
American Redstart in the brambles at Trustom Pond.

If you’ve eliminated Yellow-rumped Warbler the next most likely bird flitting about the falling leaves is the Blackpoll Warbler .  These birds stage in large numbers along the coast storing up energy in the form of fat reserves with a goal of doubling their body weight.  One study of a Black-throated Blue Warbler preparing for spring migration found these birds eat the human equivalent of 20 cheeseburgers a day for a month.  A similar massive eating effort enables Blackpoll Warblers to fly back to the rain forests of South America in one non-stop journey that can take up to 90 hours and reach flying altitudes of up to 20,000 feet.  Remember this is a bird that weighs 13 grams or a half an ounce.  This would be like a 165 pound man flying 18,480,000 miles or back and forth to the moon 36 times.  There is no way I could do that, even if I ate 20 cheeseburgers a day for a month.  Maybe you could, but not me.

The real fun begins when we see birds that are not one of these two common species.  One of the tricks to finding these less common species is to keep an eye on the weather.  Migratory birds generally will time their flights so that they are aided by the prevailing winds.  So larger number of fall migrants can often be found on days when a high pressure cold front with winds from the north passes through.  This is when we are more likely to see birds such as the Palm Warbler, Northern Parula, American Redstart, Common Yellowthroat, Magnolia Warbler, Nashville Warbler, Wilson’s Warbler, Black-and-white Warbler, Chestnut-sided Warbler or Black-throated Green Warbler.

MagnoliaWarbler
Magnolia Warbler in Non-breeding plumage in the understory of a coastal RI woodland.
Magnolia Warbler
Magnolia Warbler in Breeding Plumage.

The Providence Ghost Walk Returns


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Rory Raven
Rory Raven brandishing a Fork

Rhode Island fixture Rory Raven recently fled the Lovecraftian vibes of a haunted Providence for the witchier environs of Salem, Mass, taking the original and longest running haunted history tour of the city with him, much to the dismay of his fans who have made Raven’s brisk stroll up Benefit Street an annual Halloween tradition. Now comes word that Raven hasn’t given up completely on his city of origin: The Providence Ghost Walk is returning for a limited two day engagement. RI Future grilled the historian, folklorist and professional mentalist about this apparent turnaround.

RI Future: You titled this two day event “The Ghost Walk Returns.” Where did it go?

Raven: It didn’t really go anywhere.  I thought that, with my move to Salem and a changing schedule, I wouldn’t be able schedule the Providence Ghost Walk this year, aside from the several private tours I have booked for schools and other groups.  But as I’ll be performing at Charlie’s Ghost Party at the Sprague Mansion in Cranston on October 25th, it only made sense to stay in the area and do the Ghost Walk again on the 26th and 27th.

RI Future: How did you come up with the idea of Ghost Walk and where do you get your stories?

Raven: I’ve always loved a good ghost story, even as a kinder, gentler skeptic. Sometimes ghost stories are just good fun, sometimes they offer a glimpse into forgotten history, and sometimes they are continuations of folklore traditions, so there’s always something interesting going on.  Most of the stories I tell on the Providence Ghost Walk are tales I’ve found in old books, or that have been told and retold in Rhode Island for generations.

Back in the 1990s, I took a ghosts-and-graveyards tour with Anita Rafael in Newport.  Her approach was to focus on history and folklore.  It was a great tour. Afterwards, I thought that someone should be doing a similar tour of Providence, which had its own rich and stories history.  And then it became obvious that it should be me!

My focus has always been history, literature, and folklore.  I have no interest (or belief) in orbs, cold spots, EVPs, and things of that ilk, so you won’t hear about them on the Providence Ghost Walk.

RI Future: You’re now competing with a host of imitators and latecomers. Have you done any of their tours? How do they compare with the original?

Raven: I really don’t consider myself in competition with anyone.  I do the original, longest-running haunted tour in town.  I am the author of Haunted Providence, which makes me literally the man who wrote the book on this topic.  I’ve never taken any of the tours that sprung up after I started, so can’t really offer comment (he said politely).

RI Future: You recently left Providence and live in Salem now. Any plans to do a version of Ghost Walk in Salem, like a Witch Walk?

Raven: Within a few weeks of arriving in Salem, I spent an afternoon sketching out a walking tour.  I’ve since done a rough draft of the tour for some friends, and will be tweaking it and probably starting to offer tours in the spring.  Once again, I’ll be taking the history, literature, folklore approach, hitting the high (and low) points in Salem history – the colonial days, the witch trials, the East India trade, Hawthorne, the Great Fire, with a couple of ghost stories and infamous murders along the way. There are already a dozen or more tours available in Salem, some better than others, so finding a new niche will be challenging but interesting.

RI Future: You’re a fairly successful author of several books on the odder aspects of Rhode Island history.

Raven: Yes.  Yes, I am.  My first book was Haunted Providence: Strange Tales from the Smallest State, much of which was drawn from the Ghost Walk but includes other stories as well.  Next was Wicked Conduct: The Minister, the Mill Girl, and the Murder that Captivated Old Rhode Island, about the sensational murder case of Sarah Maria Cornell.  That was followed by The Dorr War: Treason, Rebellion, and the Fight for Reform in RI, which told the story of Governor Thomas Wilson Dorr and his struggle to expand voting rights.  Gov. Dorr is one of the most important figures in RI history, his story is compelling and tragic, and he is very much a forgotten hero.  The latest book is Burning the Gaspee: Revolution in Rhode Island.

RI Future: Finally, you’re also an accomplished mentalist. What are your future show plans?

Raven: I would like to do two rather contradictory things – one is to tour the show to more and bigger venues, and the other is to set the show up in a regular venue on a regular schedule.  I also look forward to the day when I retire my repertoire entirely and start over from scratch.

Rory Raven brings back the Providence Ghost Walk at 3pm Saturday, October 26th and Sunday, October 27th. Tickets are $9.

Wingmen: Put your money where your mouth is


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

wingmen1025Should the public sector invest its savings based on our social values?

Of course we should! That such a question can even be debated speaks volumes about what our values are: making money. Though, as my TV arch nemesis Justin Katz points out, it would be a great follow up if that gun stock turns out to be a real dog!

News, Weather and Classifieds for Southern New England

 

Angel is in!


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Providence Mayor Angel Taveras makes it official on Monday as the Providence Journal reports he’ll announce he’s running for governor next week. WPRI also reported the news last night.

Taveras, the “Head Start to Harvard” first Latino mayor of Providence is a champion of progressive values and local liberals are inspired by his candidacy in the same way we were with Barack Obama in 2008. A key difference is Taveras has executive political experience as mayor of the Capital City. He averted a financial crisis in Providence by negotiating compromises with organized labor and local tax-exempt nonprofits.

Taveras will likely square off against General Treasurer Gina Raimondo, who has come under fire lately for cutting public sector pensions and then reinvesting those savings in volatile alternative investments with high fees for money managers. Pundits anticipate a bruising primary, with Taveras receiving grassroots support from local labor unions and other Providence political activists while Raimondo will benefit from anonymous super PAC donations from wealthy Wall Street special interests.

Yesterday, Taveras personally asked Raimondo if she would sign a People’s Pledge and disavow anonymous out-of-state donations. Her campaign has yet to respond to the overture though it did distance itself from the idea on Wednesday.

Clay Pell is also considering running for governor as a Democrat. The wealthy grandson of Senator Claiborne Pell, it’s unclear how his candidacy could affect the Taveras-Raimondo race.

taveras btw

 

 

A Halloween ode to standardized tests


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

zombie marchSome may scoff.
Others ignore.
But, the ‘Pumpkin’s Curse’
is something I saw.

So, sit back friends,
it’s a scary tale
about what happens
when school kids fail.

This story, macabre,
has goblins and ghouls,
all of whom
prey on our schools.

The Curse of the Pumpkin

There once was a time.
There once was a place,
where teaching kids
became a race.

Where kids were tested
day and night
to see if they
could answer just right.

They raced in the cities.
They raced in the towns.
Each student was rated
either up or down.

In order to determine
who was the best,
folks at the top
had invented a test.

Called it the NECAP
and gave it much weight.
If you didn’t pass it,
you’d graduate late.

Or perhaps worse,
not at all.
This test was given
each and every fall.

Those folks at the top
of a place called RIDE
looked at the testing
with all kinds of pride.

They talked about measures,
standards and failings.
They talked of how
those teachers were derailing

their efforts to test
each laddie and lass.
“How dare they,” one stated,
“have each student pass.”

Now, some of the children
from very rich schools
had little problem
playing RIDE’s rules.

Many tested quite high.
Few tested quite low.
Most were quite sure
of which college they’d go.

It didn’t quite matter
what they had learned.
All anyone cared
was the grade each kid earned.

But, for a number of children
it was hard to write.
They spoke different languages
or their wallets were tight.

And, when considering math,
those with special needs
were hurt worst of all.
Were hurt most indeed.

At a moment when things
where going so slow,
voices from Providence
told which way to go.

Students of Color
Hispanic and White,
all came together
to do something right.

They sang in the evening.
They spoke in the day.
Telling all listeners
testing wasn’t the way.

Then lo and behold,
other strong voices
followed the students
extolling new choices.

Rumblings and bumblings
came from the top.
The boss of all bosses
said, “This has to stop.”

So she sent out henchmen,
set down new rules,
fired some teachers,
closed some old schools.

Then, with all of this done
and much more said,
she brought out new pencils
loaded with lead.

More tests were ordered
rather than less.
Why this was done
‘twas anyone’s guess.

When all seemed lost,
at a point of despair,
an autumn wind
provided something rare.

You see, dear reader,
during this autumn season,
many things happen
despite any reason.

The Mets won a series.
The NECAPs are done.
Bizarre things happen
with the shortening sun.

Yes, a Halloween gift
from a power unseen
turned everyone at RIDE
back into a teen.

And, not only that,
this is what’s best,
they were all forced to take
a standardized test.

When, surprise of surprises,
few of them passed,
each was ordered to
a remedial class.

For so many students
this nightmare is here.
Today’s graduation requirements
are something to fear.

EPILOGUE

Ask no questions,
get no tales,
Gates and his buddies
all did fail.

And let’s not forget
our friend Arne Duncan.
He too fell prey
to the ‘Curse of the Pumpkin.’

The End (or is it?)

An atheist engages with homelessness


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

miWLNnXPzfuDOKT-556x313-noPadWinter Count is an attempt to quantify the number of homeless in Rhode Island who will need beds during the extreme cold of the coming winter.

My friend and I arrived at Burnside Park and joined a group by the fountain. We were assigned to a group of seven people, one of whom, Saul, had done this kind of work before. Saul is about my age. Along with Saul, my friend and myself there were four Brown University students in our group. We ranged in age from 18 to 87, representing both sexes (five men, two women) and were racially diverse. We took a bus to South Providence (a pretty rough area, by my effete East Side standards) and covered the area from the McDonald’s restaurant, through the cemetery that divides Broad St from Elmwood Ave and then up Broad St (and through most of the side streets on either side) up to and around St. Joseph’s Hospital.

After getting our bearings we entered the graveyard and met our first homeless persons. There were three people there preparing to bed down for the night. Our instructions were to be casual, courteous and not force an engagement with people who would rather not talk. We gently explained who we were and what we were doing.

One of the homeless men referred to us as “church people” and immediately associated us with helpful people who have given him food and blankets in the past. Since I was still learning and observing at this point, I simply let Saul do most of the talking. He was gentle, direct and sincere. I was very impressed by his manner and his evident compassion. We talked with the small group of homeless, made sure they did not have any pressing, emergency needs (aside, I suppose, from the fact that they had no shelter and were preparing to sleep overnight in an open graveyard) and entered into our tally sheet notations for two adult males and one adult woman.

It was more difficult than I imagined it would be, and more emotional than I anticipated to move on and search for more homeless. The three I initially met that night ran the range from talkative and appreciative of the interest our group showed to complete silence in our presence. The woman complained of multiple things, but her language was slurred by alcohol and she was confused, difficult to understand and very sad. The three had the clothing they wore, blankets, and some food and alcohol, as nearly as I could tell. They warned us away from the darker parts of the graveyard where people could not be trusted to be nice.

We next went into some of the darker parts of the graveyard. Here I met people in a place so dark I would never recognize them in the light. There were four men and two women, all in various states of homelessness. One man said that the homeless were not well represented on the streets because many had taken to squatting in abandoned, foreclosed and boarded up buildings. Though in our travels we met some who live this way, we of course could not trespass into buildings but only view from the outside for possible signs of habitation. The rules stated that we were only allowed to count homeless persons we actually saw ourselves.

The man we talked to called these squatter houses “abandominiums” and he explained how even people with social security checks who could afford a monthly apartment rental were prevented from securing apartments because they could not manage the first and last month’s rent or first month’s rent plus security deposit. Many fail the background checks police run because of their criminal records (which might be a consequence of their homelessness).

A young woman was with the group. It was impossible to tell her age. She claimed to be eighteen but could have been as young as fourteen. It was simply too dark to tell.

On the street and elsewhere we met with fourteen homeless that night. Many had long, rambling, incoherent stories to tell. One man talked about having his ID stolen by men in a white truck which means he’s in trouble with the Tennessee branch of the FBI. Another simply smiled and smoked and spoke in a raspy voice that vanished when he opened his mouth. I could not understand his words but merely nodded.

We met one man I had heard of before. I do not want to violate his privacy, so I will only say that I almost recognized his voice and when he said his name I knew him from his job in Rhode Island media. This man is homeless now, and alcohol and perhaps mental illness have rendered his stories and anecdotes nearly incomprehensible to understand.

Eventually we covered our area and made our way back to the bus stop. We turned in our results and I went home to my house and warm bed. I found the experience to be profound and had much to consider.

First, there is cultural power in religion. We were called “church people” by one of the first homeless men we met, and though he could not tell our faith or much else about us, the term “church people” was like a code word for “safe.” We were safe to talk to. We were not cops, we were not other homeless persons, and we were not people interested in causing harm. It occurred to me that seeing a group as diverse in age and race as we were, that one of the best assumptions as to why we came together to do something good for other people is that we are in some way religious.

Later in the night a man asked us if we believed in God and I was silent on the question, because it was important to this man that we believe in God for some reason. It was a way he knew to ascertain if we could be trusted. Many in my diverse group were religious. The students answered easily that they were believers, two of them were Catholics. The man asked where they went to church, which is the kind of personal information we were told not to give out about ourselves, but the student who answered mentioned a Catholic church in his home state of Louisiana, so I did not think this too much of a breach.

This assumption, that people do good because of their religion is not just a false cultural assumption. In the very real world the homeless people we met last night live in, religious people are pretty much the only people they can trust. The government might promise shelter, food or money, but political whims or complex procedures to determine qualifications for help can quickly and confusingly deprive someone of the promised care.

Religious people can be counted on to deliver blankets, food and other amenities without conditions and without judgment. I know how ironic this sounds. We think of religious people as offering help and support in payment for listening to their sermon, and I am sure such people exist, but to the people I met on the street last night, this was not their perception. They saw belief in God as a way of determining how much to trust a stranger.

I was new and still learning last night. I do not know what the reaction would be if I told a homeless person that I was an atheist. I worry that the ensuing conversation might sound like I was proselytizing my non-belief in some way. Avoiding the truth seems dishonest, but at the same time, my priority has to be the care of these people, not defending my personal beliefs.

The Rhode Island Coalition for the Homeless is not a religious organization, but there are several religious groups among their membership, including Quakers, Congregationalists and Catholics, to name just three. The Coalition’s Vision of “a State of Rhode Island that refuses to let any man, woman, or child be homeless” is an idea that transcends petty religious and political debates. This is a human problem requiring human solutions, and I am proud to have contributed, even if only in a small way.

The great journey south – RI’s migratory shorebirds


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
A Semipalmated Sandpiper hunkers down on a late fall day near the Charlestown Breachway.
A Semipalmated Sandpiper hunkers down on a late fall day near the Charlestown Breachway.

The kaleidoscope of colors found in the fall foliage as trees stop making chlorophyll and reveal a spectacular assortment of red, yellow, purple, and orange pigment is one of the great consolation prizes accompanying the loss of summer.  However, there is another miracle of the natural world occurring in autumn, albeit a slightly less obvious one, fall bird migration.

Each fall millions of shorebirds, songbirds, raptors, and waterfowl stop in Rhode Island on their migratory journeys south.  These birds are engaged in majestic pilgrimages of thousands of miles from breeding territories as far north as the Arctic to their wintering grounds in locales as distant as South America.

A patient observer on a fall walk along one of Rhode Island’s beaches may be treated to glimpses of more than a dozen species of plovers and sandpipers.  These two major groups of shorebirds are most easily distinguished from each other by the shapes of their bills.  Sandpipers have long thin bills, while plovers have short, thick bills.  In addition, their behavior is another reliable tool of identification.  If the bird is foraging quickly in a large group it is most likely a sandpiper.   On the other hand if it is more methodical and solitary in its foraging technique it is likely a plover.

A Black-bellied Plover at risk of existential crisis as the blackness of his belly recedes in the fall
A Black-bellied Plover at risk of existential crisis as the blackness of his belly recedes in the fall

The most common sandpiper found along Rhode Island’s shores is the Sanderling.  This is the bird most likely to be observed in large groups foraging at the ocean’s edge, following the surf as it advances and retreats.  Sanderlings forage on small invertebrates both within the surf and in the exposed sand.  While many of these birds will stay in Rhode Island throughout the fall and winter, others are merely pausing to rest and refuel before embarking on the next leg of their journey.

Sanderlings in the intertidal zone.
Sanderlings in the intertidal zone.

The other two sandpipers which are commonly observed along the ocean’s edge during the fall are the smaller Least and Semipalmated.  These two species are similar in size and appearance, both being smaller and darker than the Sanderling.  The easiest way to distinguish between these two species is by looking at their legs – the Semipalmated has black legs and the Least has yellowish legs.

A Least and Semipalmated Sandpiper find a way to get along in the same tidal pool despite their differences in leg color.
A Least and Semipalmated Sandpiper find a way to get along in the same tidal pool despite their differences in leg color.

Our most common plover is the Semipalmated Plover, although it lives in relative obscurity due to the notoriety of its cousin in the genus Charadrius – the Piping Plover.  Another very common visitor this time of year is the Black-bellied Plover.  A larger Plover in the genus Pluvialis.

A Semipalmated Plover forages on the mudflats in early fall.
A Semipalmated Plover forages on the mudflats in early fall.
Juvenile Piping Plover
Juvenile Piping Plover

Once the common birds become familiar it becomes easier to pick out the less common migrants like the Baird’s Sandpiper, Buff-breasted Sandpiper, or Red Knot.  In addition, many more shorebirds can be found in the salt marshes behind the barrier beaches.

But let’s save that for another day, I can see your eyes glazing over in the back.  Just get out there and enjoy the beautiful fall weather and the salt air, and maybe stop for a minute and take a closer look at these small migratory birds passing through our state on their way to distant lands.

The Atlantic Ocean at Sunset
The Atlantic Ocean at Sunset

 

 

The making of a Wall Street Democrat


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

hedge fund timelineRaimondomania has turned into Raimondomageddon.

The quarterback of pension politics was revered by the right in 2012, winning praise from the Manhattan Institute, ALEC and the Wall Street Journal among others. But 2013 has been a political lynching from the left – with Ted Siedle, Matt Taibbi, David Sirota and more all calling her signature accomplishment a wealth transfer to Wall Street.

To help keep track of all the out-of-town media attention, I made this timeline. It’s still a work in progress, so let me know if I’ve omitted any in the comments below and I’ll update as warranted. The tool on the right controls the view of the timeline.

People’s Pledge: Let’s give it a try

KerryWeldIn 1996 incumbent John Kerry and Governor William Weld were headed toward an epic showdown for the U.S. Senate in Massachusetts. Closely matched as candidates, they knew spending in their upcoming race could break records. In a novel twist the candidates themselves sat down and negotiated an agreement to limit the total amount that could be spent by the campaigns (including from their personal fortunes), their respective parties, and outside groups. They also agreed to a series of televised debates throughout the state. Although the spending caps broke down in the final days, the race was a watershed moment for campaign finance.

Fast-forward to 2012 and incumbent Senator Scott Brown reached out to challenger Elizabeth Warren (read the actual correspondence) and challenged her to enter a People’s Pledge. Modeled after the Weld-Kerry agreement it included limits on outside spending (it’s notable that no one is talking about limiting total expenditures any more—Citizens United changed the political landscape and dialogue). After significant back and forth, both candidates signed on and even sent notice to third party groups and TV stations that might run their ads, warning them to stay out of the race.

Common Cause Massachusetts reported that the 2012 People’s Pledge did a great job at minimizing outside money in the Brown-Warren race when compared to similar races that year. We know that outside spending is overwhelmingly negative, can come from undisclosed sources, and can be raised in unlimited amounts. In 2013 when the Gomez-Markey race did not have a pledge outside spending from right and left came flooding back in.

So here we are in neighboring Rhode Island looking at the prospect of a very expensive Democratic primary, followed by a very short, but quite-possibly expensive, general election for governor in 2014. Typically races for governor aren’t fought on the national issues that draws outside groups into Senate races but that may be different this time.

Common Cause Rhode Island would like to see all candidates for governor negotiate a People’s Pledge.  We mentioned the idea over a month ago when the first self-described Super PAC emerged.  Sam Howard wrote about the idea at length on RI Future soon after.  Quite frankly, we were waiting for the candidates to actually declare before we began to push for an agreement.

So now the cat is out of the bag.  As a non-partisan group that does not engage in electioneering it would be easy to just let the topic die.  We do not want to be seen as favoring any candidate over another.  But this is too important a topic.  Rhode Island deserves a campaign in 2014 that will focus on issues, not attacks. We deserve to know where the money that is backing the candidates is coming from. For those reasons we are asking the would-be candidates to meet and discuss this idea.

This won’t be easy.  Massachusetts has demonstrated that these agreements might take some time to work out, but that they can work.  Each candidate has strengths and weaknesses when it comes to campaign finance and the negotiations should address those.  As the Supreme Court dismantles limits on money in politics (and next it might be limits on contributions directly to candidates) we need to look to alternatives.  The People’s Pledge may be our best hope.  Let’s give it a try.

NRA PAC leaves RI politics


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

The local political action committee for NRA has gone away, according to the state Board of Elections. And Sam Bell of the Rhode Island Progressive Democrats thinks it might be because his group filed a campaign finance complaint against them.

“As far as we are aware, the Board of Elections has yet to issue a formal ruling, but we view this move as confirmation of the seriousness of the violations we have alleged,” Bell said in an email. “We hope that the Board will issue appropriate fines after a thorough and complete investigation.”

According to records, the NRA Political Victory Fund dissolved on September 26. In September the RI Progressive Democrats filed a complaint alleging that the local NRA PAC is lying on campaign disclosure forms when it claims to have received at least 1,500 donations of $100 or less.

Ric Thonton, who oversees campaign finance matters for the Board of Elections, said he could neither confirm nor comment on investigations. But he did say, “the dissolution of a PAC does not prevent it from being investigated.”

Rhode Island isn’t known as a hotbed of gun rights, but it has been a hotbed of gun politics lately. Republicans were embarrassed for raffling off an assault rifle at a gun club fundraiser and Exeter Town Councilors are facing a recall election for outsourcing handgun permitting to the state police. Meanwhile, both Providence and the state are divesting from investments in guns.

NRAPACClosureScannedForm

 

Rhode Island is Arizona


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

We are all ArizonaNow that yet another debt ceiling debacle is behind us, it’s time for Congress and the White House to again focus its attention on immigration reform, says a coalition of Rhode Island urban advocacy groups known collectively as “We are all Arizona.” They holding a rally at the State House Thursday and across the country activists are celebrating a “week of dignity and respect.”

Jhanet Cabrera, of the Olneyville Neighborhood Association, said, “Deporter-in-Chief Obama continues to call for immigration reform, but it’s time for him to put his money where his mouth is,” , one of the local organizations calling on the POTUS to renew the nation’s focus on immigration reform. “With the stroke of a pen, the man who has deported more immigrants than any other president – 2 million and counting – could suspend all deportations pending passage of immigration reform.”

Juan Garcia, of the Committee of Immigrants in Action, added: “For years, the human rights of immigrants – our dignity and respect – have been trampled upon. Today, as we find ourselves on the brink of passing immigration reform, we say to the politicians in Washington, D.C. that we will not tolerate failure. If they don’t pass reform, we’ll make them pay at the polls.”

The press conference follows a forum and march earlier in the month. The coalition thanked Congressman David Cicilline for attending the event. They also thanked Providence mayoral candidate Brett Smiley for marching with them.

Providence pioneered gun divestment in RI


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Far be it for RI Future to give Gina Raimondo credit for an initiative pioneered in Providence but that’s exactly what I did yesterday when I applauded her for suggesting the state divest from guns. The State Investment Commission did vote to stop investing in a company that sells guns yesterday, but the Capital City voted to divest from guns back on March 18.

“The City Council has a moral responsibility to ensure that no public money is being used in the manufacture of weapons that are endangering public safety,” said the resolution passed by the Council. “Now, therefore, be it resolved, that the Providence City Councîl does hereby urge the Providence Boaïd of Investment Commissioners to continue its review of the pension investments to determine whether or not its portfolio includes equity firms that have holdings in companies that manufaeîure assauìî weapons and divest from any such firms.”

PVD Gun Divestment

 

Interview: Gayle Goldin on election year lawmaking (Part 3)


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Freshman Sen. Gayle Goldin (Democrat, District 3 – Providence) won national praise for Rhode Island this session when she helped shepherd through legislation that expanded the state’s Temporary Disability Insurance to cover workers who need to take time to care for a new addition to the family or a seriously ill relative. Recently, she was kind enough to sit down with RI Future for a wide-ranging interview. The following transcript has been lightly edited for written media.

Read Part 1 here.
Read Part 2 here.

TDI-gayle goldinRI Future: Given that that would actually be a pretty controversial move in 2014, I’ve heard observers cynically remark that nothing big happens in an election year in the General Assembly, what’s your opinion on that kind of sentiment?

Gayle Goldin: I think big pieces of legislation pass when there’s the will to get them done. The value of an election year is that it’s an opportunity for constituents to be even more engaged with their elected officials and share with them their ideas about what is really important to them.

RIF: Given that 2014 will be an election year, if it yields a governor elected as a Democrat, do you think that relationship between the governor and the General Assembly will change much?

GG: I feel like as a new member of the Senate I can’t really talk too authoritatively about that, certainly I have worked with Chafee’s staff on my legislation this year, I have worked with different parts of the administration on that legislation, and I would assume that would continue, but I don’t really know all the levels of relationship. I only know my personal experience.

RIF: 2014 is also likely to see a vote on whether we have a constitutional convention, what are your thoughts on that?

GG: Our last constitutional convention was 1986, which is before I moved here. I have spoken to a lot of advocates about their opposition to having a constitutional convention. One of the things I really understand from those conversations is the level of risk to important issues that can come up through the process. I went back and looked at the ballot questions from 1986 and you can see how important issues, like reproductive rights, can be at risk during a constitutional convention. I think we can really see how many issues that are important to the progressive community come up to play and can be manipulated inappropriately through this process, given the amount of money that could now come into the state to sway the outcome of the convention.

Julian days and Healthcare.gov


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

julian daysThere is a great deal of gnashing of teeth going on about healthcare.gov, the Obamacare portal for people who live in a state that refused to create its own exchange.  I’m sure that some of the well-reported woes of the web site are deserved, but it seems fairly obvious that a large number of the commenters, and the complainers, have little idea what they are talking about.

I have no direct knowledge of the software behind healthcare.gov, neither of the team behind it, or the technologies they are using.  But I do have some expertise in web sites, software, and data management, acquired over 28 years consulting in the software industry at many different companies, and there are some things that are being said that are just plain wrong.

To begin with, the health care exchange is not “just” a web site.  It is a system that has to communicate data between lots of different insurance company databases very quickly.  You can’t get a quote from a dozen different insurance companies to appear in any other way.  This means that a dozen different insurance company databases have to be equipped to provide that kind of real-time response to a query.

To anyone who has spent time thinking about data, this is already the knell of trouble.  To anyone who is counting how many insurance companies in how many states this system must deal with, this sounds much worse.

First, a tale.  Back in the early days of working with data, I ran across a measure of time you frequently see in science data, the “Julian” day.  The idea here is that dealing with months and years is kind of a pain when you want to draw a graph, so let’s just number the days from the first year and ignore the months and years, and things will be much simpler.  It’s not a terrible idea, until you want to exchange your data with someone else.

At that point, you discover that you were counting days from January 1, in the year 1, and they were counting them from the year zero.  You point out that there wasn’t a year zero, but they say it makes the math work out better. Or you discover that you were using the days as a measure, so that day 2.5 means noon of the third day, whereas they said that day 2 was the second day and day 2.5 is nonsense.  Or you discover that though it says Julian days, they were counting leap years on the Gregorian calendar so your counts are two weeks off theirs.  Or you discover that you were using local time, and they were using Greenwich time. Or you find yourself looking at satellite data, where measurements can be taken from two or three different days within any 24-hour period.

I ran across this issue because for a number of years I contributed to a science data project, meant to normalize access to a whole lot of oceanographic and other earth science data.  Even beyond questions of data units, there were structural problems with interoperability, too.  There were two widely-used data sources in that project that, given the constraints involved, turned out to be impossible to reconcile.  Which is astonishing, since they were data measuring more or less the same things about the oceans.  But one of them had been created by scientists who believed the data ought to be accessed a small bite at a time while the other had been created by scientists who believed you should get big chunks at a time.  

These guys had made design decisions early on that made working together utterly impossible, and with the best will in the world, the two could not be reconciled to work in real time without one team essentially scrapping its original design and putting in a lot of work while the other team sat around and waited for them.  Try as they might, there was no middle ground because neither one wanted to give up their design.

These are some of the lessons I learned:

  1. In data, even when people are talking about the same thing, they’re not necessarily talking about the same thing.
  2. Even when people want to work together, design decisions made in the distant past might make it difficult.  
  3. When two teams have to choose between their approaches, there is very seldom middle ground.  One team gets to do all the work to convert to the other’s approach, while the other team sits around and makes snide comments.
  4. No engineer thinks another engineer’s approach to a problem is worth a dime. 

Now think about trying to resolve problems like this among a few hundred databases run by insurance companies who are not necessarily going to be the most cooperative folks out there.  Think about it: you’re an insurance company IT executive and the healthcare.gov folks ask you if you might change the format of your data reporting to coordinate with the other companies in your state.  Your immediate response?  Why should we change and not them?  That’s more work for us and besides our system was designed better.

So not only are the healthcare.gov folks working against a few hundred different design decisions, but they’re also counting on having been able to anticipate all the data entry errors that might be lurking in hundreds of databases out there, and hoping that everyone has decent support staff, too.  

On top of that, healthcare.gov also has to interact with a handful of databases from other government departments, so there are similar problems on that end.  For those who sneer that the private sector would have gotten it right, let me tell you another time about my work on the airline reservation system that never got built, or the credit card database whose books didn’t balance, or the speech recognition system that couldn’t distinguish between “pizza” and “tractor.” 

In other words, big systems are complicated.  It is a scandal that the federal exchange isn’t ready yet, but no one should underestimate the social, technical, and management challenges faced by the team putting it together.  When you hear someone who says healthcare.gov is “just” a web site, you are hearing someone who does not care to understand the problem.

The good news is that there is little reason to doubt that most of the problems will find workarounds soon.  The issues are difficult, but the need is there to resolve them, and they will be resolved.  By this time next year, the glitches will be a memory, and it often seems that is what some of the critics fear most.

Maybe later, People’s Pledge


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

taveras btwYes, I was smiling when I read the news that Angel Taveras had called for a People’s Pledge in the RI Democratic Primary for Governor. Common Cause RI pointed to the study by Common Cause MA that the 2012 People’s Pledge for the race between Elizabeth Warren and Scott Brown reduced the amount of influence of outside groups in the election.

Then, I read Gina Raimondo’s response: we’ve already been attacked by special interests, donate the full amount AFSCME paid for the Seidle Report. I may have boiled it down a bit.

My initial thought was “savvy move, Raimondo, savvy move.” Except when I pause to think about it, it’s not really. Taveras has already been attacked as well; notably in totally unfocused ones by the American LeadHERship PAC that couldn’t decided whether the mayor was a political insider or a political novice. Taveras could’ve opened his push for a People’s Pledge by suggesting that would be a place to start for Raimondo, but he didn’t. Which is rather congenial, considering those were nutty political attacks.

It appears that the harrowing few weeks of negative press from progressive left media like Salon and Rolling Stone and the center-leftish The New York Times on pension reform (something which Raimondo could’ve foreseen when she started accepting awards from right-wing think tanks) have raised hackles in the Treasurer’s camp (after decades of ignoring them, suddenly every Rhode Islander is an expert on investing pensions).

Asking Taveras to donate money for something AFSCME is independently angry about makes as much sense as Taveras suggesting Raimondo donate the People’s Pledge amount of the attacks on him over the Davey Lopes pool. When you make decisions that are part of your office, criticism of you by the people effected is expected (and justified). Just because you’re about the engage in political campaigning doesn’t mean you get to wave a wand and say “politically-motivated, don’t have to listen.” You take it, even if it sucks.

Political observers are free to read the tea leaves as they will. I’m sure pro-Raimondo partisans will read this as a political ploy on the Mayor’s part, attempting to handicap the Raimondo campaign (who seems most likely to benefit from outside spending). Pro-Taveras partisans will read this as unease on the part of the Treasurer, who even with a nearly 3:1 money advantage may be unsure if she can win a Democratic primary likely to tilt to the left without outside help.

I’m sure people think I’m marked in the Taveras camp because I write for RI Future and other reasons. But I want to be clear. I don’t see much, policy-wise, that differentiates the two candidates. I think Gov. Raimondo will make policy choices that a Gov. Taveras would also make, and vice versa. I wasn’t just calling for a People’s Pledge in this post last month, I was calling for a substantive (and civil) debate on issues. For one thing, I’d like for the RI Democratic Party to have a primary that wasn’t just a referendum on whether the 2011 pension reform is popular among Democratic-affiliated voters and Democratic primary-voting unaffiliateds.

What it appears to me is that there seems to be a personal animus between the candidates and their camps, which is more likely to scuttle anything than other issues. Which is why I fully expect this primary to devolve, though I sincerely wish it wouldn’t. Rhode Islanders deserve a good campaign focused on things more than bloody socks and telling the President to shove it.

Perhaps whoever triumphs in the Democratic primary will find candidates more receptive in the general election to a People’s Pledge, if this one sinks (Common Cause RI has already called for a general election People’s Pledge). Or maybe we’ll have to rely on down-ticket races to act as pathfinders for the big races and establish a tradition of People’s Pledges. As Rhode Islanders well know, an established tradition can be a powerful tool in enforcing compliance in a practice.

 

P.S. There’s also a media issue here, which is that discussion of the People’s Pledge gives the media a chance to remind us about the ol’ campaign finance scoreboard and tell us what it told us earlier this month. Guess what folks, we’re not voting on whether we prefer the $2 million candidate or the $690K candidate! Cash on hand does not equal a good governor.

Taveras calls for People’s Pledge in governor’s race


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Gina Raimondo and Angel Taveras supporting payday loan reform. (Bob Plain 5/18/12 Click on image for larger version)
Gina Raimondo and Angel Taveras supporting payday loan reform. (Bob Plain 5/18/12 Click on image for larger version)

In an effort to keep out of state interests from buying up the governor’s race, Providence Mayor Angel Taveras is asking Democrats to sign a People’s Pledge the disavows SuperPAC donations and other anonymous contributions.

“We shouldn’t allow outside special interests – whether it is deep-pocketed contributors or Wall Street entities – to spend freely through Super PACs or other Independent Expenditures,” Taveras said in a prepared statement. “We can’t allow Wall Street or special interests to use Super PACs as a backdoor to buy their own Rhode Island government. These are often shadowy groups who aren’t subject to public scrutiny. Voters deserve free and fair elections with the greatest transparency as possible.”

His campaign has been working on the pledge for several months, and it is based on two Massachusetts campaigns that took similar pleges: Congressman Ed Markey and Senator Elizabeth Warren. “I think Elizabeth Warren set a terrific example for Democrats by calling for an end to outside spending in campaigns,” Taveras said in a statement.

The idea of using a People’s Pledge in Rhode Island’s 2014 Democratic primary for governor was floated by Sam Howard in this post in September. In it, he writes:

Maybe we’ll be served well by a bruising Democratic primary…

…Or maybe reason and sense will come to our would-be leaders. And instead of behaving like two Cold War commanders; locked in Mutually Assured Destruction, each attempting to win with a devastating first strike; they’ll have a moment of sanity, as they so often have appealed to us to find within ourselves.

Then they might set aside whatever distaste for one another they might have, and meet, and take a People’s Pledge. And they could tell us that unaccountable money has no place in the Rhode Island of today, and should that vile spending find its way into our small state the benefactor will donate a sum to charity.

WPRI broke the story earlier this morning with this great lede: “He hasn’t formally declared his intention to run for governor, but Providence Mayor Angel Taveras is already trying to set the rules for the race.”

“It is one thing to opt out of the voluntary public financing system,” Taveras said in the press release. “It is another thing to allow Super PAC activity on one’s behalf after so many good Democrats worked hard for campaign finance reform in Rhode Island. Super PACs and Independent Expenditures are extraordinarily unpopular with Rhode Islanders and citizens across the country who are concerned about unchecked outside money in campaigns. As Democrats, we should hold ourselves to a higher standard,”

Here’s the pledge:

Rhode Island People’s Pledge

Because outside third-party organizations – including but not limited to individuals, corporations, 527 organizations, 501(c:) organizations, SuperPACs, national and state party committees – may air and continue to air and/or direct mail Independent Expenditure advertisements and issue advertisements either supporting or attacking (individually the “Candidate” and collectively the “Candidates”); and

Because these groups function as Independent Expenditure organizations that are outside the direct control of any of the Candidates; and

Because similar agreements have been proven to work in statewide campaigns in Massachusetts; and because the candidates agree that they do not approve of such Independent Expenditure advertisements and/or direct mail and want those advertisements and/or direct mail to immediately cease and desist for the 2014 gubernatorial election cycle; and

Because the candidates recognize that in order to provide the citizens of Rhode Island with an election free of third-party Independent Expenditure advertisements and/or direct mail, they must be willing to include an enforcement mechanism that runs not to the third party organizations but instead to the candidates’ own campaigns:

The candidates on behalf of their respective campaigns hereby agree to the following:

1. In the event that a third-party organization airs any Independent Expenditure broadcast including radio, cable, satellite, online advertising and/or direct mail in support of a named, referenced (funded by title) or otherwise identified candidate, that candidate’s campaign shall, within three (3) days of discovery of the advertisement buy’s cost, duration, and source, pay 50% of the cost of that advertising buy to a charity of the opposing candidate’s choice.

2. In the event that a third-party organization airs any Independent Expenditure broadcast including radio, cable or satellite advertising, online advertising and/or direct mail in opposition to a named, referenced (including by title) or otherwise identified candidate, the opposing candidate’s campaign shall, within three (3) days of discovery of the advertisement’s buy’s cost, duration, and source, pay 50% of the cost of that advertising buy to a charity of the opposed candidate’s choice.

3. In the event that a third-party organization airs any broadcast including radio, cable, or satellite online advertising and/or direct mail that promotes or supports a named, referenced (including by title) or otherwise identified candidate, that candidate’s campaign shall, within three (3) days of discovery of the advertisement buy’s cost, duration, and source, pay 50% of the cost of that advertising buy to a charity of the opposing candidate’s choice.

4. In the event that a third-party organization airs any broadcast including radio, cable or satellite, online advertising and/or direct mail that attacks or opposes a named, referenced (including by title) or otherwise identified candidate, the opposing candidate’s campaign shall, within three (3) days of discovery of the advertisement buy’s cost, duration, and source, pay 50% of the cost of that advertising buy to a charity of the opposed candidate’s choice.

5. The candidates and their campaigns agree that neither they nor anyone acting on their behalf shall coordinate with any third party on any paid advertising and/or direct mail for the duration of the 2014 gubernatorial election cycle. In the event that either candidate or their campaign or anyone acting on their behalf coordinates any paid advertisement and/or direct mail with a third-party organization that candidate’s campaign shall pay 50% of the cost of the advertisement buy and/or direct mail cost to a charity of the opposing Candidate’s choice.

Penalties for Breach

In the event that the undersigned candidate fails to make the charitable donation within the three-day time requirement, then the charitable donation shall double the required amount for an additional five (5) days after which if the charitable contribution is not made, then the charitable donation shall increase an additional amount representing an increase of 50% to the immediately preceding required charitable amount.

The candidates and their campaigns agree to continue to work together to limit the influence of third-party advertisements and to close any loopholes (including coverage of sham ads) that arise in this agreement during the course of the campaign.

 

David Segal, Maggie Gyllenhaal say stop watching us


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

What do David Segal, John Conyers, Maggie Gyllenhaal, Oliver Stone, John Cusack and Phil Donahue have in common? They are all members of the new group named after what it wants the US government to do: Stop Watching Us.

“We need to end mass suspicion-less surveillance,” Gyllenhaal says in the video.

On Saturday, the 12th anniversary of the infamous Patriot Act, the group is holding a march from in Washington D.C. According to their website: “Right now the NSA is spying on everyone’s personal communications, and it’s operating without any meaningful oversight. Since the Snowden leaks started, more than 569,000 people from all walks of life have signed the StopWatching.us petition telling the U.S. Congress that we want it to the NSA accountable and to reform the laws that got us here.”

The group is calling upon Congress to:

  1. Enact reform this Congress to Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act, the state secrets privilege, and the FISA Amendments Act to make clear that blanket surveillance of the Internet activity and phone records of any person residing in the U.S. is prohibited by law and that violations can be reviewed in adversarial proceedings before a public court;
  2. Create a special committee to investigate, report, and reveal to the public the extent of this domestic spying.
  3. This committee should create specific recommendations for legal and regulatory reform to end unconstitutional surveillance;
  4. Hold accountable those public officials who are found to be responsible for this unconstitutional surveillance.

“The public’s going to stay focused on this issue until meaningful reforms are implemented, and we’re hoping the Rhode Island delegation will stand with us.  In the immediate, that’d mean supporting the legislation that Patrick Leahy and Jim Sensenbrenner are putting forth, and working to undermine bills that will be pushed by the Intel Committees that only entrench the status quo or even make things worse,” Segal said, whose group Demand Progress is one of the champions of this cause.

segal stop watching us

Divest pension funds from guns, but don’t stop there


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

gina linc pensionDivesting from dangerous weapons is a step in the right direction, and I applaud Gina Raimondo’s effort to make our pension fund more socially responsible. This blog doesn’t often have opportunity to agree with the hedge fund-loving general treasurer, but I certainly hope the State Investment Commission takes her advice and takes our money out of a company that distributes guns.

I’d also encourage Raimondo and the others who control Rhode Island’s $7 billion nest egg to look hard for other opportunities to be more socially responsible with our money. This would be a pension reform progressives would be proud to support, and would be better for our economy than cutting COLAs or enriching hedge fund managers.

Divestment, or socially responsible investing, is already a movement in Rhode Island. The Providence City Council recently voted to make its investment portfolio better match its values (what that will look like still remains to be seen) and Brown Divest Coal has long advocated for the Ivy League endowment to take its money out of companies that harm the environment.

Here’s hoping Seth Magaziner’s political ambitions will help shine a bright light on why socially responsible investing is a better bet for Main Street. High finance can be community-minded. And the more it is, the more profitable being community-minded will become.

Hotel, hospital workers unite!


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Members of Local 217 gather outside the Renaissance Hotel for an Informational Picket.
Members of Local 217 gather outside the Renaissance Hotel for an Informational Picket.

The working class stands up to management tonight in Providence as two groups of employees – one unionized, the other not yet – will protest outside their places of employment.

Hospital employees and SEIU members will be calling attention to job cuts at Women and Infants today at 4:15. “Despite budget surpluses, senior managers Care New England are attempting to cut corners and compromise patient safety by laying off housekeeping, lab, and clinical staff,” said Patrick Quinn of the SEIU.

“Management’s plan to cut staff will mean hospital rooms are cleaned less frequently and increase the risk of infections which compromises patient safety,” said Sukie Ream a labor delivery room nurse. “Layoffs to clinical and lab staff could delay delivery of lab results which is not fair to patients.”

And in downtown Providence, Renaissance Hotel workers will march there at 5 pm to call attention to the federal health and safety violations the hotel was recently fined $8,000 for According to a press release, “The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) recently cited the Renaissance for serious violations, finding, amongst other violations, that “’employees’ hands, arms and faces were routinely exposed to corrosive and irritating chemicals.’”

Hotel housekeeper Santo Brito said, “Management has claimed that there is no safety problem, but the Federal investigation showed differently. Hotel management allowed these dangerous conditions to exist because workers have no voice at the Hotel. I am proud the workers stood up to stop this. The hazardous use of chemicals in the hotel caused us workers all kinds of physical suffering, from bad rashes all over our arms to frequent sickness.”

Capitalism is Bust; What’s next?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Seeding a Post-Capitalist Future: Discussion/video evening at the Voluntown Peace Trust. Friday, October 25, 2013: Potluck at 6:30 p.m. Program begins at 7:30 p.m. Voluntown Peace Trust

Hey 99%, how does it feel to be a disposable commodity?

A little over two decades ago Francis Fukuyama, political scientist and political economist, astonishingly argued in The End of History that in Western liberal democracy humanity might have found the “end-point of mankind’s ideological evolution.” Chris Hedges, a prophet of doom rather than hubris, in his The Death of the Liberal class expressed the view that: “Unfettered capitalism is a revolutionary force that consumes greater and greater numbers of human lives until it finally consumes itself.”

Fukuyama may have distanced himself from what he advocated in the nineties, but he drew a telling caricature of mainstream Western thinking. Even as deregulated capitalism riotously generates Hedges’s nightmares of social despair and destruction of the biosphere —as described in Days of Destruction, Days of Revolt— many of us have been so indoctrinated that we can no longer conceive of an alternative to our “free market” system of  entitlements for the rich.

Almost one hundred years ago Bertrand Russell wrote in Political Ideals:

Political and social institutions are to be judged by the good or harm that they do to individuals. Do they encourage creativeness rather than possessiveness? Do they embody or promote a spirit of reverence between human beings? Do they preserve self-respect?

Can anyone disagree with these values and doubt that we dramatically fail in their realization? After all, we spend about 60% of the discretionary budget on so-called national defense. Combine that with a prison system that disproportionately affects people of color and has  incarceration rate  that exceeds by an order of magnitude, the rates one finds in Europe, Canada, Australia and Japan, and it becomes difficult to disagree with Vijay Prashad when he states: “Prisons and war are the rational extensions of the system in which we live.”

Out-of-control war spending and incarceration are just a few “minor” symptoms of capitalism on its final descent into self-destruction. The mass extinction that might be caused by global warming  has the potential to produce death on a scale hundred  or thousand times as large. Will this happen and when? Nobody knows, but clearly the tipping point for run-away climate change is dangerously close.

<em>Seeding a Post-Capitalist Future:</em>  Discussion/video evening at the Voluntown Peace Trust. Friday, October 25, 2013: Potluck at 6:30 p.m. Program begins at 7:30 p.m. <a href="http://www.voluntownpeacetrust.org" target="_blank">Voluntown Peace Trust</a>
Seeding a Post-Capitalist Future: Discussion/video evening at the Voluntown Peace Trust. Friday, October 25, 2013: Potluck at 6:30 p.m.
Program begins at 7:30 p.m.
Voluntown Peace Trust

What are the alternatives?

This Friday the Land Stewards of the Voluntown Peace Trust will sponsor a discussion and video evening Seeding a Post-Capitalist Future. Although you would not read this in the corporate media —is there still anyone left who is reading them?— many of us agree, once again using Russell’s words, that

Capitalism and the wage system must be abolished; they are twin monsters which are eating up the life of the world.

We recognize what John Buck talks about:

I am supposed to be living in a democracy,” I said, “but I spend
much of my life at work in a basically feudal structure. There is a
Duke of Operations, an Earl of Administration, a Baroness of
Personnel, and so on. […] the only vote I have is with my feet
walking out the door.”

See We the People: Consenting to a Deeper Democracy by John Buck and Sharon Villines.

Few know that right now

  • 25% of the American electric system is co-op or municipal, essentially socialized.
  • Land trusts do development locally: profits accrue to the the public or non-profit.
  • California and Alabama use pension funds to finance in-state investments worker-owned companies.

Contrast this last item with Rhode Island’s use of pension funds to underwrite entitlements for Wall Street hedge fund managers.

To sum up, here is a list of topics for the discussion on Friday:

  • worker cooperatives
  • dynamic self-governance aka sociocracy
  • urban agriculture
  • prison abolition and racism
  • climate change (or catastrophy)

See you this Friday and please bring your friends and neighbors!


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387