How to bolster RI’s solar industry


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

east providence solar memeJust about everyone I talk to about renewable energy says that they want solar panels on their roof. Not only do you get the warm and fuzzy feeling of helping save the planet, but in the long run it’s a great investment.

Even without any support through state incentives, solar systems will pay for themselves in a little over a decade, after which they generate energy cost savings for decades. For most people though, that 10 year pay back period is just a little too long, and the upfront capital just a little too large to justify the investment. As a result, Rhode Island’s residential renewable energy industry has been anemic in the years since 2010 when the State’s renewable energy tax credit program was phased out.

Rhode Island solar installers have been forced to look for work in Connecticut and Massachusetts where strong renewable incentive programs have stayed in place. For the sake of the environment and our struggling economy, it’s time to rectify this situation. The good news is that there are already a couple of new programs in place that should help, and there a couple of renewable energy legislative initiatives that could become law this session.

First, what we have:

  • Commerce RI (formerly the EDC) has grants available through its Renewable Energy Development Fund (REF). Installers apply for these grants, and they are handed out in three rounds. The first deadline is on April 7th, so if you’re interested in a solar array, find an installer today and let them know. (These are also available for commercial scale projects, so don’t be afraid to think big. Last year, the REF was underutilized)
  • PACE: Last year the General Assembly enacted the Property Assessed Clean Energy financing program which makes it easier for individuals to finance renewable projects by amortizing and attaching them to a property’s tax assessment for up to 20 years. More info here. Basically, you get to pay for your system in installments rather than all at once. The only problem is that each municipality has to adopt the PACE program individually through resolution. It’s not too early to start asking your council members whether your town is on board.

Second, the potential:

All together these programs would make Rhode Island a national leader in supporting renewable energy. They would be a boon to our still struggling building trades, a major benefit to the homeowners smart enough to invest in solar, and a way to reduce our carbon emissions and reliance on dirty foreign fossil fuels. What are we waiting for?!

Providence College postpones controversial anti-LGBTQ lecturer


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
200x229MichelleCretella1
Cretella

From an outsider’s perspective, Providence College seems caught between wanting to be two very different things. On the one side, PC wishes to be an academic institution dedicated to free and open inquiry, pursuing the truth where ever the search may lead. On the other hand, it sometimes seems that there are those who wish this Catholic institution of higher learning to be a defender of the Catholic faith, promoting theology as science with an eye towards influencing public policy.

Back in October, PC came under criticism for canceling a talk by Wayne State University philosopher John Corvino because his lecture, in support of marriage equality, would be “in defiance” of PC’s “fundamental moral principles.” I took some hits from the conservative Catholic right for my position, but the controversy was all but settled when Providence College’s Faculty Senate passed a resolution, by an overwhelming majority, taking Provost Hugh Lena to task for canceling Corvino’s talk.

In seems that Providence College, for the most part, is more interested in being a free and open academic institution than in simply being a forum for Catholic apologetics.

That’s not to say that those interested in inserting pseudoscience and poor philosophy into the public debate have gone away:

Dr. Matthew Cuddeback, sponsor of the controversial “Who Am I?” talk by Dr. Michelle Cretella, has announced the postponement of the event due to concern that “Dr. Cretella may be the object of animus were she to present at PC next week.” Dr. Cuddeback alleges inconsistency in campus support for academic freedom.

Cretella has long been an opponent of marriage equality and LGBTQ rights, often injecting her ideas and opinions into our state’s ongoing discussion over these issues. In 2008 she, along with Bishop Thomas Tobin, joined the board of NOM-RI, the group that led the fight against marriage equality in Rhode Island.

Cretella is on the board of the National Association for Research of Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH) an organization that claims homosexuality is a mental disorder that can be cured. She is also Vice president of the American College of Pediatrics, “a socially conservative organization that formed in 2002 as part of a protest regarding the American Academy of Pediatrics support of adoption by gay and lesbian couples.”

As Megan Grammatico notes, “Dr. Cretella is… biased. She is the vice president of an organization that was formed originally to oppose adoption by gay and lesbian couples, and relies on bad science to do so. See the heavily criticized research of Mark Regnerus here.” Grammatico’s piece does an excellent job running down why Cretella’s positions and views put her far outside the definition of scientist, and should be read in full.

Apparently a level headed and on point critique of Cretella’s credentials and scientific honesty has caused Matthew Cuddeback to conclude that his invited speaker “may be the object of animus were she to present at PC next week” and so he cancelled the event, but not before playing the victim card:

I am struck that many of the indignant voices raised for academic freedom in the wake of the cancellation of Dr. Corvino’s talk have been absent or ambivalent in the discussion of Dr. Cretella’s talk. Where are those voices now? Some have been silent. Some are harrumphing about NARTH, science, and reparative therapy. Some, who proposed to advocate for a campus-wide discussion that would include all perspectives, are trying to shame faculty who invite a speaker holding one of those perspectives, as irresponsibly insensitive to LGBT students. Do they believe that the freedom to speak belongs only to those who agree with their position?

It is hard to believe that Cuddeback isn’t being knowingly disingenuous here. His line about critics “harrumphing about NARTH, science, and reparative therapy” indicates the value he places on fidelity to good science and honest discussion. John Corvino and Michelle Cretella could not be more different as academic speakers. Whereas Corvino uses peer reviewed research and cogent argument to make his points, Cretella misuses good research and presents discredited studies as fact to spread her theologically biased beliefs. Cretella associates with NOM, an anti-LGBTQ hate group.

In short, Cretella does not deserve academic support because she does not do academic work.

Matthew Cuddeback, who invited Cretella to speak, is no stranger to disingenuous arguments. His testimony at the Rhode Island State Senate marriage equality hearing in 2013 was a pointless, confused and almost incoherent ramble about biological and “psychosexual complimentarianism.” You can watch it here:

High School senior was given detention for swearing on Twitter


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

nickbNick Barbieri, a senior at North Attleboro High School, was given detention for swearing in a tweet. His assistant principal, he said, also threatened to suspend him if he didn’t delete tweets explaining that he had been asked to delete the offending tweet.

But Barbieri already had tens of thousands of followers on Twitter from his job reviewing video games on YouTube. So it wasn’t hard to drum up support. Soon enough the media and the ACLU had caught wind of what promises to be an emerging area of First Amendment rights: what can kids say on the internet and when can they say it.

In Barbieri’s case, he wasn’t at school when he tweeted, so school officials agreed to revoke his punishment. Now, he’s looking for an apology.

“I haven’t received an apology from Miss Todd but I don’t think that’s going to be coming any time soon,” he told me today. “At the same time I respect my principal’s ability to admit when they are wrong and admit when the decision needs to be rescinded.”

You can listen to our entire conversation here:

Obamacare is working in RI, says state stats and Senator Whitehouse


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

HSRI-changes-ad-v6If you’re wondering why you are no longer hearing that dull roar from conservatives about the failed state of American health care, it’s probably because Obamacare is working.

That’s what the latest statistics from HealthSourceRI indicate.

Here’s what ProJo health care reporter Felice Fryer wrote yesterday:

Medicaid enrollments in Rhode Island are soaring, with 35,821 people newly signed up as of Feb. 8 — way ahead of projections.

Additionally, enrollment in private insurance through HealthSource RI continues to accelerate; 16,512 signed up as of Feb. 8, up from the previous month’s cumulative total of 11,770. Rhode Island has already exceeded the Obama administration’s target of 12,000 by March 31.

Nationwide, more than 3 million Americans have enrolled in health care exchanges across the country, according to a press release from Senator Sheldon Whitehouse.

“The numbers in Rhode Island and across the country send a clear message: Obamacare is working,” he said yesterday in a prepared statement. “I hope Republicans will look at these numbers and realize that the health care law is making a difference for millions of Americans, and that it’s time to stop re-hashing old arguments over a law that is now settled.”

Should we tax and regulate marijuana, or let law enforcement seize and keep revenue?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Beth Comery is a former Providence police officer who has become an advocate for taxing and regulating marijuana in her retirement.
Beth Comery is a former Providence police officer who has become an advocate for taxing and regulating marijuana in her retirement.

Marijuana made it into the local news in two very different ways yesterday.

At the State House, two legislators announced they will again push a bill to legalize, tax and regulate marijuana like alcohol. Meanwhile, far away from the state capital near the Connecticut border, three young men were arrested for growing and selling pot.

Sen Josh Miller and Rep Edith Ajello spoke about how regulation can help keep cannabis away from kids and create revenue for the state and small businesses.

“Marijuana prohibition has been a long-term failure,” Miller said yesterday. “Forcing marijuana into the underground market ensures authorities have no control of the product. Regulating marijuana would allow the product to be sold safely and responsibly by legitimate businesses in appropriate locations.”

Earlier in the week, Rhode Island and Connecticut police seized more than a half million dollars in cash and product from a group of entrepreneurs who had evidently put together a not-so-small agricultural operation in spite of the law.

“In total, the search warrants resulted in the seizure of 248 marijuana plants, over 46 pounds of processed marijuana and $312,678 in United States Currency,” said a press release from the Rhode Island state police.

Miller and Ajello’s bill would put a $50 excise tax on every ounce of wholesale marijuana sold to a state-sanctioned store (much like liquor stores in Rhode Island). That means Rhode Island missed out on more than $30,000 in revenue from this one bust. The bill would also put a 10 percent tax on the retail sale of marijuana. That’s another $30,000 in revenue the state missed out on, assuming the confiscated cash was from the sale of said marijuana.

“Taxing marijuana sales will generate tens of millions of dollars in much-needed tax revenue for the state, a portion of which will be directed towards programs that treat and prevent alcohol and other substance abuse,” Ajello said at yesterday’s State House press conference.

Meanwhile, Rhode Island state police said more than 10 law enforcement agencies worked since January to arrest three people for growing and selling a plant. No guns and no other drugs or contraband was identified. Police did say Rhode Island medical marijuana cards were being misused, but that may be an indication that the three men are willing to comply with the law if the law were to recognize their very profitable business model.

“Marijuana prohibition is a failed policy, and when a law is broken it needs to be fixed,” said Jared Moffatt, of Regulate Rhode Island, the grassroots group working to take pot off the streets and put it onto the tax rolls. “Regulating marijuana is the solution because it will take control away from illegal dealers, and it will improve the Rhode Island economy by generating tax revenue and creating jobs.”

Even though a recent poll shows a majority of Rhode Islanders support legalizing marijuana, pundits have said politicians are unlikely to act on the tax and regulate bill this year because it is an election year.

Thanks for standing against domestic spying, Congressman Cicilline


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

cicillineIt is rare for me to call my elected representatives, and rarer to call them allies. Like many Rhode Islanders, I swim against a tide of cynicism.

However, Congressman Cicilline, whatever brand of patriotism has motivated you to oppose the NSA and its spying, for that patriotism you have my own honor in accord. I am with you.

I am quite unsure whether or not the rest of our delegation will do what you have bravely done: co-sponsor and support the USA Freedom Act in order to limit, and hopefully soon end, these flagrant abuses of power by the NSA and other surveillance programs.

For you, sir:

I will never forget, and will forever cherish, the day I witnessed our Congress, your Congress Mr. Cicilline, an edifice I had long given up on, rise up and strike against a beast that grew in darkness. You, our public servants so often estranged, had a special fire in you. I saw, perhaps for the first time in my adult memory, an unlikely coalition of fearful friends struggle to defend the dignity of their people. This was no fool’s errand; it spoke to the heart of what we need from you now. More than ever we need it, from all your fellows!

We may have missed by twelve votes then, but not this time. We have a better bill, and a more focused will to fight.

Remarkably I find myself with a renewed faith that, in the ever-darkening halls of public office, there may remain enough principled people to make these, the toughest of decisions: those that may cost us the cheap domain of comfort, and they, their own seats of power, all to alleviate the real suffering of another.

I am with you, sir, as nothing secures our common dignity but our willingness to be vulnerable. Together! May those who feel otherwise be banished to the safety of their small hearts and soulless thrones. We all suffer for our inaction, so thus let us bear the burden together, at once, and abolish these programs of suspicion, torture, and murder!

For the reader: please consider reaching out to our other delegates in Congress, Senators Reed and Whitehouse, and Representative Langevin, and to all who will listen. Implore them to fight back against this regime of unwarranted spying and data collection that threatens our privacy and self-respect as a society. Support the USA Freedom Act! Follow this issue and those most difficult to come. Dearest reader, we cannot afford to do otherwise, and so much more remains for us to bear.

In earnest, for his protection of our common liberty, let us thank Congressman Cicilline for his service.

Government surveils anti-surveillance rally


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
DSC_9226
US Marshall and Homeland Security keep a watchful eye…

Tuesday, February 11, 2014 has become “the day we fight back against mass surveillance” and in Providence a rally against NSA spying was held outside the Federal Building next to Kennedy Plaza downtown. Five minutes after protesters representing MoveOn.org and the Rhode Island Coalition to defend Human and Civil Rights (RICHCR) unfurled a large banner that said, “Dear U.S. Government, STOP SPYING ON US!!” a white Homeland Security vehicle pulled up and a representative of that agency kept a watchful eye, even going so far as to leave his vehicle and physically patrol the protest. It wasn’t long before members of the U.S. Marshall Service and the Providence Police arrived as back up.

DSC_9135One might wonder why members of three law enforcement agencies were required to keep the sidewalks clear for pedestrians and to keep the protesters from using the stairs when giving speeches. One may further wonder why a small crowd of peaceful demonstrators, standing up for their constitutional rights, should be prohibited from using the stairs of a public building for short speeches to a small crowd.

DSC_9158

As Greg Gerritt said during his short talk, “Clearly the Department of Homeland InSecurity and the Providence Police have nothing better to do than to watch a bunch of gray haired people hold signs in front of the federal building.”

DSC_9214Speaking at the event were Chris Curry of MoveOn.org, Randall Rose of RICHCR, RI Future columnist Greg Gerritt, Robert Scott Perry of Portsmouth and others. It was as the last speech ended that the officer from Homeland Security informed the organizers that the protest was over and that it was time to leave. According to Randall Rose, who pointed out that the protest was taking place on public property, “[The Homeland Security officer] said that the sidewalk was federal property and ordered us again to stop protesting and leave.  He said that we’d already had our protest.”

It is the height of irony and government hubris that a government official, charged with protecting the Constitution, should approach a group of citizens agitating for Constitutional protections and decide for them the limits of their rights pertaining to free speech and free assembly.

The presence of so many officers (from at least three different agencies) was meant to intimidate free citizens and to curtail protest.

DSC_9206
Chris Curry, MoveOn.org
DSC_9183
Are you intimidated yet?

DSC_9139      DSC_9193

DSC_9219
Clearing the stairs…

DSC_9217

DSC_9221

DSC_9222

DSC_9235

DSC_9233
This government protest is over by order of the government.

DSC_9230

DSC_9151

DSC_9144

DSC_9200

Jorge Elorza: School transportation ‘a matter of priorities, not cash’


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Housing Court Judge Jorge Elorza, who is running for mayor of Providence, said the city has to find the money to offer transportation to students who live more than two miles from school.

elorza“We need to dramatically decrease the minimum distance for students to receive bus passes,” Elorza said in a detailed statement released this afternoon. “With a total city budget of $662 million, we must make it a priority to find the $1.35 million to fund passes for the 2,100 students who live between 2 and 3 miles from school. $1.35 million is only 0.2% of the total budget. This is a matter of priorities, not cash.”

A new report and the Providence Student Union have called attention to Providence as a regional outlier in that it doesn’t provide transportation to high school unless the student lives more than 3 miles away. Most districts in Rhode Island and other cities in the region provide transportation at two miles.

He wrote: “As a community, we have to do everything in our power to make sure our students are in their classrooms and learning. Our students face too many challenges for us to be creating additional institutional barriers for them. Denying students who live between 2-3 miles away from school bus passes impacts learning, impacts health, and impacts safety, and our low-income communities are disproportionately affected.

When I was a child growing up on Cranston Street, my Mother acted as the school bus for many kids in the neighborhood. Although we were lucky to have her there to bring us to school, not every student is as lucky as we were.”

How Building Futures is building both RI and the inner city economy


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Sen Jack Reed engages with Rhode Island's future during a recent event at Building Futures, an initiative of the Prov Plan.
Sen Jack Reed engages with Rhode Island’s future during a recent event at Building Futures, an initiative of the Prov Plan.

Evidence that apprenticeship programs help the community and its people can be found all over Providence, in both the projects and the people Building Futures has helped bring together.

There’s Brian Pack who said he’s always worked “dead-end jobs” before Building Futures helped him learn a trade and join a union. Or Hassan Brown, of South Providence, who got his first decent construction job on a project at Brown University through Building Futures. Or Varsana Sihavong, whose career as a carpenter he owes to a Building Futures apprenticeship helping to build a CVS in northern Rhode Island.

“There just aren’t many programs out there that target my age group,” he said. “There are programs for teens, but very few for adults. It’s been a great opportunity.”

Building Futures, a partnership between the Prov Plan and organized labor, helps the construction industry in the Ocean State find new talent from inner city Rhode Island.

According to its website, “Building Futures is both a program that helps prepare low income men and women in urban areas for rewarding careers in the commercial construction and an initiative that partners to expand entry-level training opportunities in the trades through proven apprenticeship programs.”

Started in 2007, Building Futures and has trained more than 150 inner city adults to work in the construction industry. And according to members of  Rhode Island’s congressional delegation, it’s the kind of program that needs to be expanded if the skills gap is to be eradicated and Rhode Island rebuilt for success.

“Building Futures is a terrific program that helps young people, especially those in low-income, urban communities, build the foundation for a career in commercial construction,” said Senator Jack Reed. “It is helping to close the skills gap by creating opportunities in the building trades through established apprenticeship programs.”

Congressman Jim Langevin said, “The skills gap has had a particularly significant impact on our state, preventing many individuals, especially those from underserved communities, from getting back to work. This partnership provides an excellent model to create employment opportunities and develop a qualified workforce to take advantage of them.”

Peoples’ Pledge update: ‘went well’ campaigns still ‘far apart on scope’


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

tableClay Pell, Gina Raimondo and Angel Taveras have so far largely agreed with one another as they stake out their campaigns to win the Democratic primary for governor. But not so much when it comes to a potential Peoples’ Pledge, according to John Marion, the executive director of Common Cause RI, who oversaw the two hour conversation the three candidates had about it on Monday.

“The sides are pretty far apart on the scope,” said Marion, “but once they present some language I hope things will move along quickly. Everyone indicated a desire to get this done.”

Here’s the statement Marion sent to me when I asked him to comment:

It went well. We got through the ground rules discussion pretty quickly and had a long (2 hr.) conversation about the substance of a possible Pledge. The parties agreed to draft language and circulate it to the group by Monday. By Tuesday I’m going to touch base with everyone and try to set up the next meeting. The sides are pretty far apart on the scope, but once they present some language I hope things will move along quickly. Everyone indicated a desire to get this done.

Today is the day to fight back against the NSA


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

fight back nsaAll across America today – and in Providence at 1pm – Americans will fight back against the National Security Agency and remember Aaron Swartz, the internet activist who took his own life last year and fought alongside Rhode Island’s own David Segal to keep the NSA off of random American hard drives.

Segal, a former RI state rep who ran for Congress in 2010, and Swartz together created Demand Progress, a progressive organization that fights for net neutrality and against domestic internet spying by the US government.

Today that organization is leading some of the biggest names on the web in a national day of action to draw attention to the NSA proactively searching everyone’s computer for evidence of wrongdoing. Occupy Providence helped organize the action at Kennedy Plaza at 1pm today.

Aaron_Swartz“Today the greatest threat to a free Internet, and broader free society, is the National Security Agency’s mass spying regime,” Segal said in a press release. “If Aaron were alive he’d be on the front lines, fighting back against these practices that undermine our ability to engage with each other as genuinely free human beings.”

Demand Progress is joined by the ACLU, Upworthy, the Progressive Democrats of America, Reddit, Tumblr, Mozilla, Greenpeace and Amnesty International in sponsoring this day of action. And the National Journal reports that Google, Facebook, Twitter, AOL and Microsoft also joined the cause Monday.

According to National Journal:

“organizers are promising that banners will be prominently displayed on websites across the Internet urging users to engage in viral activity expressing their opposition to the NSA. Additionally, those banners will ask readers to flood the telephone lines and email in-boxes of congressional offices to voice their support of the Freedom Act, a bill in Congress that aims to restrict the government’s surveillance authority. It remains unclear to what extent Facebook, Google, and the others will participate, or whether they will host such banners on their individual sites [Ed note: no doodle today].

And if you don’t yet understand why you should care about the mass surveillance sweeps the NSA is doing to every American, watch this video:

Chomsky: U.S. is ‘leading the world backwards’ on climate


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

The ongoing rash of fossil fuel industry related disasters would be comical if it weren’t deadly serious. Trains loaded with gas and oil derailing and exploding, chemicals for treating coal spilling into West Virginia’s water supply, coal ash from Duke Energy leaking into a North Carolina river, fracking earth quakes and water pollution; the list is getting depressingly long. Given the ugly backdrop, you’d think fossil fuel companies would be having a tough time getting any new projects approved.

chomskyBut we don’t live in a rational world, we live in a business-dominated world where the people (and by people I mean corporations) with the most money get what they want. So it was disappointing but unsurprising when the State Department released an industry influenced Environmental Impact Assessment of the northern half of the proposed Keystone XL Pipeline that said the project wouldn’t make things worse for the climate. The argument goes that the tar sands will be extracted and burned anyway. Similarly, it’s unsurprising that an expansion of the Algonquin Pipeline that brings natural gas from the fracking wells of Pennsylvania up to the Northeast (and through RI) is expected to be approved without a second thought. This is what Obama’s “all of the above” energy strategy looks like in practice, expediting the construction of fossil fuel industry infrastructure whenever possible. Locally, rather than debate the wisdom of the Algonquin pipeline, we drag our feet waiting for someone else to take the lead on offshore wind.

Chomsky is right that if the United States doesn’t take the lead on efforts to address climate change, then it’s a lost cause. With Washington, D.C. as dysfunctional as it is, the question is whether we can do something about it closer to home. The answer is yes.

For starters, we can turn the narrative on the two issues I’ve mentioned so far. Let’s make a stink about natural gas expansion in New England. Here’s a petition to oppose the Algonquin expansion. We can do better. The wind that blows off our coast is some of the strongest and most consistent in the world, and it’s right next to the massive East Coast energy market. We should be embracing offshore wind and making the case that Rhode Island is the logical hub for this incipient industry. The Block Island Wind Farm is just the beginning of what’s possible.

Additionally, the State can show leadership on climate by joining the City of Providence in committing to divest its holdings in fossil fuel companies. Here’s the petition for State divestment. There are going to be other important initiatives before the General Assembly this session. Representative Art Handy (Chair of the House Environment and Natural Resources Committee) is going to be introducing a climate bill that would allow us to catch up to Connecticut and Massachusetts in terms of our carbon emissions goals, and it will go a step farther by creating policies to help our communities with climate adaptation. It’s also shaping up to be the year that RIPTA gets financial help, and this will help us address our transportation sector emissions. There will again be a bill to reinstate the renewable energy tax credit for residential renewable projects, which you can support here. Most significantly in the near term though is a bill that would make permanent and expand the State’s Distributed Generation pilot program, which has been very successful in promoting some of the larger scale commercial renewable projects that have been installed locally. These are all steps in the right direction, and I’m optimistic in each case.

Let’s hope the rest of the United States will be like us, and we can step back from the cliff.

Is a pension compromise imminent?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Gina Raimondo, Linc Chafee and Allan Fung at the unveiling of the Truth in Numbers report.
Gina Raimondo, Linc Chafee and Allan Fung at the unveiling of the Truth in Numbers report.

An alternative proposal to Rhode Island’s nationally-recognized and highly controversial pension reforms of 2011 may soon be made public, according to Scott MacKay of RIPR, who reports that the mediator between organized labor and the executive branch will hold a press conference on Wednesday to update the rest of the state.

“This development suggests a settlement has been struck in the dispute,” writes MacKay.

And that suggests that pension politics are about to suck all or most of the political oxygen out of the Ocean State again.

And no special session this time around, legislators could be considering a new set of pension reforms as they mull all other potential new legislation.

A settlement proposal now would also potentially set the stage in the campaign for governor – with one Democrat, Angel Taveras, who started at the negotiating table when approaching pension cuts and another, Gina Raimondo, whose claim to fame to shepherding cuts through the General Assembly that labor had vowed to fight in court.

The three most-egregious aspects of the reforms for organized labor was the length of the COLA suspension, the increase in the retirement age for first responders and the percent of pension that was moved from a defined benefit to a defined contribution-type plan.

Let us know in the comments what you think – if anything – a compromise proposal should look like.

Is three miles too far to walk to school in Providence?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

walk to schoolThe Providence Student Union made national news when they invited adults to take a test. Now they are asking adults to try their morning commute to school.

In an effort to call attention to the link between chronic absenteeism in Providence public schools and the abnormally far distances some students have to walk to school, PSU members are asking Rhode Islanders to experience first hand what it can be like to walk to school in Providence. (Check out the Facebook event here)

Providence makes its high school students to find their own way to school if they live closer than three miles to their school. Most other Rhode Island school districts – and other urban areas in the region such as Boston, Fall River, Springfield and Hartford – provide for transportation after 2 miles, and some at 1.5 miles, according to a new report from Serve Rhode Island.

“The attendance/absenteeism data strongly indicate that transportation barriers are a key cause for absenteeism for PPSD high students, especially in winter months,” concludes the report.

A bipartisan bill – sponsored by Reps Paddy O’Neill and Doreen Costa (among other members of both parties) – would require all school districts in Rhode Island to provide transportation for students who live more than 2 miles from school.

The Serve Rhode Island Report says the switch would cost Providence $1.4 million and “could reduce the daily absenteeism rate during the winter months by 10 to 15 percent.”

Snow removal is a car subsidy, cities should charge user fees

The Providence Journal reports that towns and cities across Rhode Island are facing a revenue crisis in their snow removal budgets. The snow removal budgeting is just one more screaming signal that we need to rethink our relationship to our cars.

Now, of course, the roads have to be cleared one way or the other. Besides private car usage, there are obvious overarching public usages of the roads. Ambulances, fire trucks, and police that need to get to emergencies use our road system. Some users of the roads are obviously in buses. Nonetheless, the greatest direct beneficiaries of plowed streets are drivers, and yet no one pays for plowing as a driver.

I think this may be at the root of some of the problems with our winter streetscape. Some parts of our roads don’t get cleared, while others do. This is Broadway’s bike lanes, doubling as icy death trap:

broadway icy bike lane

The sidewalks in front of many private properties, like the one in this same photo, remain unshoveled. Even though there was some tough talk last winter about fining property owners for failing to clear the public walkways, the city hasn’t followed up. To add insult to injury, many of the publicly owned sidewalks, like those over I-95, are unshoveled or poorly shoveled.

On Saturday, I set out to clear at least one hurtle to pedestrians, the Westminster crossing of I-95. With as much ice accrued to the sidewalk as there is now, it took me the better part of two hours to clear away just one snow drift (although it was nice to watch some pedestrian walking through that clearing afterwards, instead of around it in the street). When you get bogged down in the work of moving even a small amount of snow, you start to pay direct attention to where the problem is worst. I noticed a few things:

  1. Although there were definitely offenders in all kinds of privately owned buildings flaunting their responsibility to shovel the walk out front, the worst offenders were those that had surface lots. It seems like the direct consequences of an icy sidewalk escape the minds of people who walk straight from the parking lot into their offices. Yet, worst still, because the footprint of these properties tends to be larger than of buildings that are of a more walkable design, even more of the sidewalk is not shoveled in these cases. It doesn’t seem that the city enforces the snow removal ticketing to begin with, but as far as I can tell there’s not a greater penalty if your property is larger. A narrow building would pay the same fine as a big box store for not shoveling.
  2. Where public properties are concerned, the widest areas that get cleared are also the most expensive. If the State House parking lot needs clearing, it gets done, despite its huge footprint. If a very wide boulevard needs clearing, it’s done. I-95 itself? You bet that’s cleared. Even the little slipways that allow cars to speed around corners and pedestrians walking in the street–cleared.
  3. There’s a lot of evidence that where we do lose parts of a street from snow cover, it’s to our benefit. There’s increasing understanding that “sneckdowns” or “snow neckdowns” can be a positive benefit to pedestrians. Leaving some snow in place in certain places is actually a good thing, and saves us money too.

Notice too, that while all municipalities are struggling with the snow, it’s not equally. Says the Projo:

Providence has used $550,000 of its $1.8-million snow budget, city Internal Auditor Matt Clarkin said Wednesday. The amount is what has been paid so far, meaning “there are likely additional payments” still to be processed.

North Providence is close to expending its snow budget, Mayor Charles A. Lombardi said Wednesday. The town budgeted $250,000 for snow removal and has spent $230,000 to $235,000, Lombardi said.

What does this say about the relative cost of different types of communities, and different types of streets? Providence is certainly not taking care of its budget better due to some great wealth gap that it’s lording over the suburbs.

In other words, in every possible way, there’s a reverse correlation to the scope of an area that needs clearing, and the actual apparent cost to private owners or the public for those areas being cleared.

I think this budget shortfall is the universe’s way of telling us that we need to realign costs to the most direct beneficiaries of a service. Some portion of plowing should come from the general budget, but a much larger piece should be paid for by user fees on cars. Remember, drivers already pay for plowing, just not as drivers. When we have to think about the relative costs of clearing four feet of sidewalk versus two-hundred feet of highway, we’ll be able to rationalize some of our municipal decision making. Maybe we’ll find that cities and towns even choose to forego clearing certain parts of a road, like slipways, in order to save money, or decide to do temporary road diets by only clearing narrow lanes instead of wide ones, thus reducing speeding. When the costs are added up, it will just make sense.

And when this guy can’t get past a snow drift, at least he won’t be paying through his taxes for the pleasure of almost getting hit by a car in a nicely cleared highway slipway.

Screen Shot 2014-02-09 at 9.19.09 PM

 

No safety when people are disposable commodities


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

One of the events organized at URI last week was a panel discussion on Alternative Strategies for Maintaining a Safe Campus. Here is an updated informal version of the notes I prepared for the occasion.

Käthe Kollwitz: PTSD
Käthe Kollwitz: PTSD

Outline

  • Identify the problem: how does one create a safe campus in a society that idolizes violence on all scales?
  • What can we do about it?

Violence

  • Societies breed the sociopaths they deserve. The following two are manifestations of the systemic violence:
    • the lone-nut on a shooting rampage
    • police departments militarized with perpetual-war surplus
  • The physical abuse we teach in military training and employ abroad in expanding our empire sets the standard for oppression we use at home.  This is what happened to non-violent protesters of Disarm Now Plowshares when they resisted our nuclear weapons of mass destruction:
    • They —nuns, priests, and a nurse— were arrested, cuffed and hooded with sand bags.
    • At the trial the marine in charge testified:

      When we secure prisoners anywhere in Iraq or Afghanistan we hood them … so we did it to them.

  • The US has the highest incarceration rate in the world
    • home of 5% of the world population and 25% of the world’s incarcerated.
    • 5% of black men; 2% of Hispanic men; less than 1% of white men are incarcerated.
    • Read Michelle Alexander’s The New Jim Crow or watch this this video. Here is a panel discussion called End Mass Incarceration; it provides the missing links required to find alternative strategies.
  • With guns as god on our side we have 30,000 gun shot fatalities per year and 70,000 non-fatal shootings. These statistics dwarf the spectacular events that feed and are caused by the corporate media complex.
  • Pro Publica had an article about the effects of violence: The PTSD Crisis that’s being ignored:
    • vicious cycle: neighborhood violence → PTSD → compromised public safety → neighborhood violence
  • These are the effects on children when they grow up in poverty and violence:
  • Pediatricians refer to this violence to which children are subjected as toxic stress. The solution of the corporate media complex assisted by the United Global Union Busters? Blame teachers for their under-performing students and call in the privatization troops!
  • Death preventable by effective health care: If we had the French health care system in US, there would be 140,000 fewer such fatalities per year.
  • The real numbers are a state secret, but a good estimate is that US national “defense” costs $4,000 per person per year. This amounts to a lifetime expenditure of more than $250,000 per person.
  • Martin Luther King in his Beyond Vietnam speech at Riverside Church onApril 4, 1967, a year before his assassination said:

    A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death.

    The system we have created is what spiritual death looks like: we are all zombies now! Two atomic bombs worth of fatalities each year, but nobody notices and nobody cares because it produces no gripping pictures on the home page.

  • This is an abbreviated list with lots of victims of systemic violence, but it’s all peanuts compared to the violence of global inequality, which kills about 25,000,000 people per year. Global climate change, which barely registers in the corporate media, may cause a number of fatalities bigger by one or two orders of magnitude. How can we begin to solve that problem, if we collectively ignore statistics like these?

What can we do?

  • There is the eternal question: “How do we deal with the danger of increasing crime?”
  • A famous Dutch criminologist, referring to a newspaper notorious for its sensationalism had a simple answer: “Read a different morning newspaper.”
  • My reply 30 years later:

    Tune out of the stupefying pap served up by the corporate media complex.

  • Get used to the idea that the brain acts as if it has two parts: (fast forward to the seven minute time mark in the video)
    • System one responds to pictures and anecdotes; it can barely count or reason and is easily mislead, but it’s fast and can save us from immediate danger.
    • System two can think systematically and critically; it can understand statistics, but it’s lazy, slow and painful to engage.
    • The corporate media talk to system one. Tune out and there will be fewer hysteria driven events such as the lock-down at URI last year.
    • Engage system one and you’ll realize that there is a war on the poor and people of color in America. The lone-nut shooter in a nice white, affluent neighborhood near you is responsible for only a minute fraction of the total number of victims.
  • How can an individual help solve problems of global scale? Follow Gandhi when he said: “Be the change you want to see in the world!” Maybe I’ll get to that, for now I’ll follow Martin Luther King with his:

    In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.

  • Once again, for the academic year 2013-2014 URI is in the bottom twenty of  LGBT unfriendly schools.
  • According to government statistics, the most prevalent hate crimes by far on university campuses result from bias involving race and sexual orientation. Drawing attention to their manifestations on campus is encouraged as long as it results in nice photo ops for administrators.  As soon as the message become a threat to the corporate brand image, the messenger is disappeared.
  • It happens all the time and it is what happened to my dear friend Andrew Winters at URI. First people get MLK peacemaker awards, but then something goes wrong and silence at URI sets in.  Andrew’s disappearance was covered in
    • CCRI’s Unfiltered Lens
    • The Brown Daily Herald
    • The Providence Journal
    • Options, RI’s LGBT community newsmagazine

    URI’s Good Five Cent Cigar, the Student Senate, and the Faculty Senate have all deliberately participated in the URI code of silence.  Blessed by the Board of Education and the Governor’s office, the tactic of choice remains loyalty to the corporate Think Big brand. As always, the tactic of choice is saying one thing in public, and doing the opposite behind the scenes.

    A perfect example took place when URI was featured in an article in The Chronicle of Higher Education. The university’s CEO wrote in his blog of March 9, 2011 under the heading Another Special Moment for URI:

    Many of your [sic] have heard me say that one cannot solve problems while trying to hide them, or by pretending they don’t exist.

    Sounds good until you find out that the photojournalist working on this article for The Chronicle was ordered off the URI campus.

Violence makes most of its victims one by one; the vast majority remain nameless.  The corporate media complex reports only on the spectacular outliers that produce juicy pictures.  Is it surprising that this feeds mass hysteria?

Meanwhile, capitalism keeps alive a health care system run by death panels consisting of criminally overpaid CEOs.  The system  perpetuates violence and oppression in the workplace, in the streets, in the prisons and a global scale. The alternative strategy that we are looking for has been formulated by Camus:

In such a world of conflict, a world of victims and executioners, it is the job of thinking people not to be on the side of the executioners.

Cheap electricity isn’t the solution, it’s the problem


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

HiEnergyCostsAs more and more Americans accept the obvious reality that economic benefits don’t trickle down, that they’re not part of economic growth and that global warming is both real and expensive, conservatives need to reach further afield to support their losing arguments. Nothing shows this more clearly than the Rhode Island Center for Freedom and Prosperity’s latest research report.

This time, their trying to gin up anger to the states Renewable Energy Standard and the electricity surcharge that funds it. Like all their reports, it’s a laugh-riot full of skewed findings and childish assumptions.

Nobody has the time to parse every piece of tomfoolery in the report. I just want to touch on their major findings and a couple of other tidbits.

(Not very) major findings

Like all their reports, this is a solution in search of a problem. News flash: renewable energy efforts cost money. Duh. Alternative energy is more expensive than fossil fuels. Duh. Perhaps saving money is not the totality of the point here. Cheap electricity isn’t the solution; it’s the problem.

These boys also need to realize to whom they are in opposition—and it ain’t just pinkos like me. Insurance companies tolerate none of these shenanigans because they are on the hook for global warming-driven weather catastrophes. Securing America’s Future Energy is mostly old-school, big-business and right-wing. Even the US Army recognizes how vulnerable we have made ourselves by insisting on fossil fuels.

RI F&P represent a far-right fringe community that is drifting further and further from even the GOP. One of the tidbits will point this out in all its glaring ugliness.

The first major finding reports that RI’s RES will cost ratepayers $150mm in additional energy costs over the next seven years. They then tie this seemingly giant amount of money to a struggling economy. But that’s just silly when compared with another energy-related cost increase: gasoline.

Because oil prices have exploded over the last decade, Rhode Islanders pay an additional $400mm each year just to get around. (That’s a conservative, back-of-the-envelope estimate; it could be as much as $600mm, depending on household size, driving distance, etc.) Over the same seven year period, this would come to $2.8b—almost 20 times more than the electricity rates. Imagine what that sum of money could do for our beleaguered public transit system.

The only other major finding they offer seems to be a typographical error. They claim that electricity rates will increase an additional 1.85% by 2020. TWO PERCENT! Seriously, either they misplaced the decimal point in that one or they need to look up the definition of the word “major.”

Hysterical tidbits

First off, the charts in this piece are distinctly poor. Because they lack clear labels, they don’t deliver much impact. Maybe this is intentional because the underlying data are weak. Or maybe they just glossed over the details. Either way, it’s really unprofessional.

Take a look at Table 6 on page 11. It mixes dollar costs and megawatt hours. Only they don’t bother to tell you which column uses which metric. Something in the chart represents thousands of somethings (000). My guess is it’s thousands of megawatt hours. But that would make the dollar amounts pretty small. Oh, they’re probably per household per year. Again, how can you tell.

More significantly, they make quite a bit out of the idea that states with RES mandates have higher electricity rates. They draw this from a study by the Centennial Institute’s Kelly Sloan. Where to start…

The report seems to imply a causality—that renewable mandates drive electricity rates—but the underlying report only states an apparent correlation. What’s more, even a cursory analysis shows that many other factors likely drive electricity rates.

For example, Sloan’s report has top and bottom 10 lists. The top 10, of which RI is a member, includes seven geographically contiguous, northeastern states stretching from New Jersey to New Hampshire. More importantly, Alaska stands as a glaring honker at number five. Alaska has no renewable mandate and is a major producer of fossil fuels. Clearly, factors other than renewable standards drive electricity rates. So this whole strain of thought is a childish red herring thrown in as if nobody would bother to look at the underlying data.

(For additional laughs, check out the Centennial Institute, a think tank at Colorado Christian University. These are the wacko birds the arch-liberal John McCain talks about. How wacko? Dick Morris and Mike Huckabee are on a poster from their 2013 conference under the heading “Cool Kids.” I mean…right?)

Equally childish, we find the assertion that the shale oil boom in North Dakota will yield lower energy costs. That is, in a word, insanity. The shale boom would never have happened but for the high oil prices that make this kind of extraction profitable. At no time in the future will oil prices decline in a significant way. That is a right wing pipe dream that they really need to get over.

Finally, we see the continued insistence that natural gas represents the ecologically sound and cost effective source of future energy. Disregard the fact that while they were writing this report, natural gas prices doubled. This concept requires the two-dimensional worldview that greenhouse gas emissions associated with natural gas represent the totality of its environmental impact. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Non-traditional gas extraction (aka, fracking) remains the biggest looming threat to the US environment. Most realistic thinkers assume that the absurd rules the gas industry somehow finagled out of the EPA are a legal smokescreen to hide an ugly, ugly reality.

This is almost certainly a case in which what we don’t know will kill us. Because the specifics of this practice remain cloaked in secrecy, environmental activists can only hunt-and-peck to find environmental impacts. But already, anecdotal evidence is showing that major fracking operations have major impacts. If, for example, fracking causes minor earthquakes, how is it plausible that any unrecovered chemicals won’t leech into ground water? Also, what chemicals does this extraction technique use? That might be a nice thing to know.

At some point in the near future, something horrible is going to happen to a community that has taken the money the gas industry offered. At very least, that’s a better bet than lower oil prices.

Please follow your own advice

For all of our sakes, the Rhode Island Center for Freedom and Prosperity should follow their own recommendations in a very real, money-where-your-mouth-is kind of way.

First, sell oil futures short. It’s only a matter of time before the shale glut collapses prices, right? Second, buy coastline real estate…and live there. Global warming is a liberal myth, so there’s no chance that you’ll get swept out to sea in a mega-storm.

That’s the sort of thing that only happens in New York City. And you know what kind of commies they are down there!

Inch by inch, we will stop commodifying kids


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

seeger singingThe great Pete Seeger recently passed away. For a few days following his death I listened to just about everything he sang that was available. He was by no means a perfect human being. Many have pointed to his controversial support of the Soviet Union during Stalin’s Regime. He later recognized this as a mistake. A complex and courageous individual, he was never afraid to voice an opinion or stick up for the underdog. Seeger’s rendition of the Garden Song has always been a favorite. The words ‘Inch by Inch, Row by Row’ reflect the feelings I have about how we educate and care for our nation’s children. From time to time there are those who wish to skip a few steps in the process. That is a shame when considering something so important.

For many years now I have been expressing some concerns about how we enculturate and educate young people. The most salient of these concerns being an over emphasis on technology, a proliferation of prescription medications and the scripted, standardized test based education that is offered young people at present. These opinions, while mine, might also be backed up by many in the counseling and education fields. Despite such view points many folks continue to advocate for the very Kool-Aid that is hurting our kids. Why? Some think that individuals like me are way off base and that problems are to a large extent fabricated. Others dismiss warning signs due to politics, power and perpetual motion. Whatever the reason, kids are the ones who are impacted most. What is that about children being our future?

In some ways we have created a cottage industry for testing companies, the Pharmaceutical Industry, some Educational Theorists and a number of business leaders. All of this has led us to view kids as receptacles waiting to be filled with data. The pace of the world has significantly changed over the last 15-20 years. During this time, kids have become plugged in to technology so much that they have little time to interact with each other. During this time, play has become organized, education standardized and anxiety, depression, ADHD along with a sense of alienation, have become common concerns. Don’t believe me – just ask a School Nurse, Social Worker or Guidance Counselor. Most teachers would concur as well. Many remain quiet for fear of retribution from those higher up. It is not Rocket Science. In fact, it is really about stuff like money, reputation, politics, power and perpetual motion. It is also about the wrong people driving educational policy.

Fixing matters is actually quite simple. Bring back things like recess and study halls to start. We should also advocate that mom and dad encourage their children to get unplugged and go outside to play. Then let us follow up by having districts drop out of the Standardized Testing as a graduation requirement, along with Common Core and we are showing some progress. These few modifications would create opportunities for kids to interact, as well as for schools to emphasize a broader spectrum of courses.

Another modification I would encourage would have to be in the area of technology. We need to slow down a bit. I realize that espousing such a belief is heresy these days. It goes without saying that technology has a prominent place in today’s world. In the future it appears that it will hold an even greater place. While the advantages are obvious the shortcomings are as well (or should be).

This is not a call for the elimination of technology. That would be absurd. This is more a call to infuse social skills dynamics into our curricula in order to enhance the use of technology. Unfortunately there are those who consider such views as technophobic. Caution, promoting mental health and seeking to advance social interactions represents the thinking of dinosaurs to them. More Kool-Aid please!

The technology schools purchase today is antiquated almost immediately. Because of this, requests for the ‘newest’ equipment will appear on school committee’s budgets frequently. Without question technology can advance education in extremely positive ways. I applaud our schools for constantly seeking to challenge and support young people. Technology can play a role. Keeping up will be a challenge. It will eventually force school officials to choose between technology and other services. All of this at a time when kids need support and human contact more than ever. Seeking a balance is going to be tricky. Not finding a balance will help to maintain a cycle where kids spend less and less time developing social skills.

Parents can help here as well. All too often, kids spend hours staring at computer screens. All too often, kids are plugged in to some device. Again, technology can do great things. So can a walk, discussion with friends and a family vacation.

I know that none of this is going to happen anytime soon. As a matter of fact, our present course is headed in the opposite direction. The messages the general population get, regarding the country’s youth, centers upon our being behind many other nations (especially in education). This causes panic for some. It represents opportunity for others. While our education system certainly has issues, it also exhibits significant strengths. What are they, you ask?

Folks come from all over the world to US Schools. Why’s that? Our Colleges and Universities are pretty good. Folks leave their homes to come to this country for a reason as well. Again, we have problems–lots of them. We have prejudice, poverty and way too much violence. Sometimes we stick our noses in other people’s business and far too often the country’s political system gets bogged down. Still, people come here in droves. That is because we have a system that can change and evolve. That is because there is flexibility here. There also are multiple possibilities. Kids who struggle with school can still catch up with GEDs, junior college, technical schools, job trainings and later on, 4 year schools, if they choose. That is of course, if they can survive High School. That does not occur everywhere. Kids in this country can get back into the game (in most instances).

What is happening now is a step backwards for young people. We have created a herd mentality that often denies diplomas, promotes stress and encourages conformity. In many ways we have reverted back to a mentality that views kids as mini adults. Maybe it is not quite Oliver Twist, but ‘reviewing the situation’ might find us wanting in terms of understanding child development. In fact, our culture spends more incarcerating people than educating them.

Today, business leaders influence the Educational Powers to enact subject matter that produces workers, rather than capable thinkers and citizens. We have also created a system where kids from poor neighborhoods, those with special needs and many English Language Learners are negatively impacted due to educational policies. Worse still, the education folk have let this happen. Welcome to the K-12 Matrix.

My final modification (in terms of this article) concerns recognizing the uniqueness of childhood and adolescence. While it is imperative that children be taught skills, discipline, socialization and responsibility, they should also be encouraged to explore, have fun and use their imaginations. In recent times much of this ‘stuff’ has been curtailed. The end result is the perfunctory form of learning we have today. That might be great for test scores and getting accepted to college, but for critical thinking, social skills and long-term relationships, it is a disaster. Did you ever think that we would have to teach people how to sleep, concentrate and be mindful? We are so busy multitasking that few of us are in the moment.

Don’t you think we should try to find time in our curriculums for moments of meaning? Don’t you think we should help kids discover life’s ‘whys’ along with the ‘hows’?  The schools cannot be asked to carry these burdens alone. Parents are essential. The community plays an important role as well. When adults tell young people that they matter good things often happen. This needs to be infused into our messages far more often. Choosing to matter should be an everyday theme so that making kids matter comes into fruition.

I am confidant things can change. No need to give up on technology and accountability. What needs to occur is balance. What also needs to occur is for us to check our priorities (and who our influences are). Somehow we have come to believe that preparing kids for work is more important than for life (including possible career options). If only Charles Dickens were around today. He would recognize the exploitation that comes in modern form. Rest well Pete Seeger. When will we ever learn?

Out-of-state progressive left still skeptical of Raimondo


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Click on image for original story by David Sitora.
Click on the image for original story by David Sirota.

Another national journalist took another shot at Rhode Island’s most hotly-debated politician: Gina Raimondo.

Syndicated progressive columnist David Sirota connects dots between Raimondo’s Wall Street campaign supporters and Rhode Island’s inability to afford to make good on pension promises while almost simultaneously cutting taxes for the rich and increasing subsidies for corporations.

It’s an accurate picture of what the last decade or so of economic policy in the Ocean State can look like when not mired in the details the local media microscope provides Rhode Island. We’ve cut taxes for the winners and we’ve cut services for the losers. We broke financial commitments to workers and we made new ones to corporations.

“So who is the real Gina Raimondo?,” Sirota asks. “Is she the politician whose pension schemes aim to protect corporate welfare subsidies while converting retiree money into Wall Street fees? Or is she the defender of pensioners against the plutocrats?”

Many on the left – and in particular the pro-labor left – feel her campaign is co-opting the progressive label for a very different agenda. At the very least she’s using the term more broadly than it has been used in the past and pro-union progressives have good reason to both take umbrage and be skeptical of her political positioning as a lefty. Organized labor is the anchor of support for the entire progressive left in Rhode Island, so it’s something of an offense to trample all over the flagship then claim to be a member of the fleet.

I’d really like for her to address the issues and allegations raised in Sirota’s latest indictment of her. I think that’s how anyone campaigning as a progressive should handle such a damning indictment of progressive credentials from a well-respected progressive writer.

10 Wingmen: Should we tax guns and is government inherently evil


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

wingmenA proposed 10 percent tax on guns and ammo to help fund public/private nonviolence partnerships has shed light on a philosophical difference between Justin Katz and I. And we have a pretty interesting and (sometimes humorous) debate about the ammo tax too, thanks in no small part to our host/referee Bill Rappeleye.

But one quick clarification first, Katz says “guns are not designed to be used in crime.” True, but they are designed to cause violence. And that’s why the sale of them should help prevent violence.

News, Weather and Classifieds for Southern New England

But back to the interesting philosophical divide though: Katz says the intent of taxes is to infringe. I think he’s wrong about that. And my great fear is that he knows it, but he is going on TV and the internet and purposefully lying about this as a means to an end: to convince the public to shrink government. (More likely is that he’s just become so entrenched in his cause that he’s not able to see the other side of the coin clearly.)

At the end, he explains how he thinks government works: “This is the problem with government and progressive policies in general. You’re not saying hey this is a good thing, let’s feed people, let’s get people jobs, let’s protect people from guns. You’re saying this is my priority I’m going to take your money and give it people I know and trust to do things I want done. That’s not the way the country is supposed to work.”

Progressives certainly are saying the first part that. Our government is too but it can defend itself (if it wants to). As for the latter part of his statement, he’s just got his pronoun wrong. Here’s the corrected quote of how our government actually works:

“We are going to take our money and give it to people we known and trust to do the things we want done.”


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387