Sheldon Rips Cato Flack Over SuperPAC Spending


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

His son may be in trouble with him at home, but in Washington D.C. it’s the corporate lobbyists and apologists who have drawn the ire of Senator Sheldon Whitehouse.

At a congressional hearing on Tuesday called “Restoring Our Democracy” which focused on how to make special interests more accountable in the political process, Whitehouse took Ilya Shapiro of the Cato Institute to the proverbial woodshed when he not-at-all-surprisingly suggested that Sheldon’s DISCLOSE Act put too high a burden on SuperPACs.

Watch the video, courtesy of PCCC:

The highlight is when, in talking about a disabled veteran he met recently, Whitehouse put some perspective on the different type of sacrifices expected of Americans to protect our country’s principles.

“We had asked that you man to go to Afghanistan and we sent him down a road that had an improvised explosive devise under it that blew both his legs off,” said the senator. “If we can ask that young man to do that we can ask the Koch brothers to put up with some impolite blogging.”

Gemma’s Flip-flop Speaks to Broader Problem


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Anthony Gemma

Anthony GemmaAfter taking a lot of heat for refusing to back fellow Democrats in a recent interview with Buddy Cianci, Anthony Gemma has reversed his position and now says he will support Senator Whitehouse and Congressman Langevin in the general election, although he still won’t support Cicilline if he happens to win the primary.

In the interview, Gemma refused to support Sheldon Whitehouse because, in Gemma’s words, Whitehouse “has not done what’s right for me.” Essentially, because Whitehouse is supporting Cicilline, Gemma refused to support him. Edited highlights of the interview can be seen here:

This rejection of his party prompted a flurry of condemnations from fellow Democrats. The former occupant of the seat, Representative Patrick Kennedy called Gemma’s statements “deeply disappointing.” Buckling under the pressure, Gemma backed down. Campaign spokesman Alex Morash announced that Gemma would vote for Whitehouse and support Langevin. However, Gemma has yet to retract his refusal to vote for David Cicilline if he winds up winning the primary.

This episode may be part of a broader problem for Gemma. Even with friendly audiences, he does not interview well. Buddy Cianci is hardly a fan of Cicilline or Whitehouse. In fact, he made fun of their names during the interview. Cianci started the interview very friendly to Gemma, but Gemma was so evasive in handling questioning that by the end Cianci was complaining that getting answers out of him was “like pulling teeth.” The full interview can be viewed here.

I had a similar experience when I interviewed Gemma in June. After refusing to answer a number of relatively simple questions—like whether he supports single-payer healthcare—Gemma wound up saying this about intervening before Pearl Harbor to stop the holocaust:

To put it mildly, this is probably not the best thing to say when you are being interviewed by a Jew, especially one whose great-grandfather narrowly escaped being sent off to the concentration camps well before Pearl Harbor. To be fair to Gemma, who has not apologized to Rhode Island’s Jewish community for his comments, I am willing to believe that he is not actually anti-semitic. Instead, he may just be a weak interviewer who winds up saying things he later regrets.

Is Barry Hinckley’s Senate Campaign on Life Support?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Barry Hinckley (Photo by Dave Pepin)

If it’s true that campaign donations determine a candidate’s success then Barry Hinckley might be in some early trouble. The rookie Republican who is challenging progressive Democrat Sheldon Whitehouse for his seat in the Senate seems to be inflating his fundraising prowess a bit.

In a press release earlier this week, Hinckley’s campaign said he “put up another great fundraising quarter” saying he was able to raise “about $275,000.”

Well, not exactly.

Today’s Providence Journal sheds a little additional light on just how much money Hinckley raised. In fact, almost 40 percent of the money he raised this quarter was actually a loan to himself. “Second-quarter campaign-finance reports that show he raised $164,629 and lent his campaign $100,000 during the quarter that ended June 30,” reports Randal Edgar.

He spent more than $155,000 – or, only $9,000 less than he got in actual donations.

By comparison, Hinckley raised $314,000 in the first quarter and didn’t loan himself any money. (Prior to the first quarter, he loaned his campaign $50,000.) That means he took in about half as much in donations this quarter as he did last quarter.

Are even Republican donors abandoning Barry Hinckley? Either way, this isn’t what I’d call a great fundraising quarter.

Barry’s Hot Over Sheldon’s Break from Bill Debate

Sheldon Whitehouse’s brief break from Monday night’s Senate debate over his DISCLOSE Act left Republican challenger Barry Hinckley a little hot under the collar…hot enough to call a press conference outside Whitehouse’s Westminster Street office on a 95-degree Tuesday afternoon to assail the Democratic incumbent.

He parried questions about these charges by pivoting to jobs.

“Why is he focusing on campaign finance reform when Rhode Island is losing jobs?” Hinckley asked. The answer, of course, being that not only is our economy broken, but so is our political system.

While the political novice was trying to take the sitting senator to task, Whitehouse trumped him by sending out a statement critical of Republicans lack of support on the DISCLOSE Act, which was blocked for a second straight day by Senate Republicans.

“I’m disappointed that so many of my Republican colleagues, many of whom have clearly supported disclosure in the past, chose today to once again defend secret spending by special interests rather than stand up for the voices of the middle class.  However, I’m also optimistic that ultimately, we will pass this bill, or something like it, to end secret spending and defend the voices of the middle class.”

Hinckley said supports portions of the DISCLOSE Act, but not the whole thing. He also wouldn’t say definitively that he wouldn’t leave a floor debate for a fundraiser if he were to be elected to congress.

National and Local Democrats Hit Doherty


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Brendan Doherty

It’s worth checking out the dossier the national Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee put together about Brendan Doherty and his political baggage. Among other things, they say crime went up across the board in Rhode Island while the candidate for CD1 was head of the State Police. It also paints the picture of a far-right Republican who wants to take rights away from women and hurt the working class.

The DCCC file has video of almost all his on-air interviews and appearances, links to all the local news coverage he’s received and a full-on history of his life, including every piece of property and promotion he’s ever received. Did you know he was on the board of directors for Beacon Mutual when the insurance company was mired in a scandal for giving price breaks to choice companies? (Update: Marc Comtois says he remembers Doherty being brought in by his friend Gov. Don Carcieri after the scandal broke)

But the interesting part for me was while national Democrats put together a file on Doherty’s local record, local Dems are hitting him on national issues. In a video released last week, the Rhode Island Democratic Party said Doherty will work hard to repeal health care reform and will generally move in lock step with conservative Republicans like Paul Ryan and John Boehner.

Follow ‘Midnight Vigil’ on DISCLOSE Act Deliberations


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Senator Sheldon Whitehouse put forward the DISCLOSE Act bill.

Not one Republican voted for the DISCLOSE Act earlier this evening so Senate Democrats, led by Rhode Island’s own Sheldon Whitehouse, plan to work the Senate floor well into the night in hopes of getting the bill that would force SuperPACs and other secret political donors to stand behind the advertisements they fund.

“I’m disappointed that so many of my Republican colleagues, many of whom have clearly supported disclosure in the past, chose today to defend secret spending by special interests rather than stand up for the voices of the middle class,” Whitehouse said in a statement. “However, as I have said before, we can’t let the special interests off the hook after just one round, and I look forward to joining my Democratic colleagues who want to continue debating this issue well into the night. In the meantime, I encourage all Americans to make their voices heard in this debate, and I hope my Republican colleagues will join us to put an end to secret election spending.”

Earlier today, we quoted Whitehouse – who predicted this would happen – as calling it the midnight vigil.

You can watch the action from the Senate floor live here.

Or follow the fun on Twitter with the hashtag #DiscloseVote or in this widget:

Senate to Vote on Whitehouse’s DISCLOSE Bill Today


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse at a community supper in East Greenwich.

Today at about 5:30, the U.S. Senate is set to vote on Sheldon Whitehouse’s DISCLOSE bill, which would require SuperPACs and other outside organizations to stand behind the negative ads they sponsor. Whitehouse is expected to speak on the legislation at around midnight.

“We’re doing what we call the midnight vigil,” said Rhode Island’s junior senator, who between this bill and the Buffett Rule bill, has sponsored some of the most high-profile and progressive legislation in the nation during this congressional session. “I’ll be on the floor until about 1 a.m.”

In describing the bill in a conference call on Friday, he said, “This is more than just a battle for clean elections, it’s more than just a battle for an American democracy that we can all be proud of and that can continue to shine its light around the world as an exemplar.”

A pared down version of a 2010 bill, the legislation would require outside political groups to label advertisements in a way that would let the consumer know who is sponsoring the message. In March, before the bill was submitted, Whitehouse described it this way:

“In the same way at the end of my ads I have to say, ‘I’m Sheldon Whitehouse and I approve this message,’ they would have to have an actual disclaimer in the ads that says we’re Exxon Mobile and we approve this message or I’m a billionaire from Macau and I approve this message so that is clear from the actual advertisement itself who the sponsor is.”

Senators are expected to vote along party lines with Democrats supporting the bill and Republicans not. But, in an odd dodge even for Washington D.C., Republicans have taken to inventing reasons not to support it. They say they won’t support it until language is removed that gives exempts labor unions. The only reason Whitehouse said he won’t remove such language, he said, is that it doesn’t exist.

“There is not place in this bill where unions are treted any differently than anyone one else,” Whitehouse said. “If you want to show me a place where I can find it in this bill, where labor unions get special advantage, have at it. Show me some language. You can look at this bill on its face and you can see there is no special treatment for anyone.”

We’ll see tonight if Democrats have any luck convincing Republicans that the language doesn’t exist, or if they come up with new reasons not to support the bill. Proponents of the legislation will be tweeting about it tomorrow, and invite you to join in, using the hashtag: #DiscloseVote.

Anthony Gemma Should Drop Out of CD1 Race


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Anthony Gemma

Anthony GemmaThe campaign to represent Rhode Island’s first congressional district in Washington DC will surely be the most interesting and scrutinized local race this year and, so far, there is only one thing that is certain: Anthony Gemma won’t win.

He could, however, potentially damage David Cicilline enough in an ugly primary to leave the incumbent vulnerable to the real challenger, Republican Brendan Doherty. But he won’t win. Not even the primary. No way. Not gonna happen. No chance.

First off, Gemma has absolutely no institutional support, which is crucial in a primary. At Friday’s annual local Democratic Convention, his nomination didn’t even garner a second, reports Will Collette in an excellent piece on the event in Progressive Charlestown. Collette writes:

When it came time for nominations, one delegate, who said she grew up as a friend of Gemma’s back in the day, stood to put his name in nomination. When Party Chair Ed Pachecho asked, not once but three times, if  any delegate would second the nomination, not one delegate among the 200+ would do so.

That leaves me to wonder how Gemma can claim to be the only electable Democrat for the First Congressional District when he can’t organize up a second to his nomination among 200+ Democrats. His supporters yelled out “democracy, democracy” when his nomination failed for lack of a second, but minutes later, they all filed out of the room.

But it’s more than just Gemma’s lack of support that makes him a bad candidate; he’s also just a bad candidate.

Last election, as a rookie, he ran as a pro-business fiscal moderate and this time he is claiming to be more progressive than his very progressive opponent – it paints the picture of a flip-flopper politically and at best an unknown variable on policy given that he’s never held office before, or even shown much interest in the process until a few years ago.

He’s also a pretty poor public speaker, a disaster at dealing with the local press pool and far less than adroit at answering questions on his feet. His latest gaffe was not taking a hardline on Nazi Germany in a recent interview with the RI Progressive Democrats.

Note to all pols: when asked about Hitler or the Nazis, it’s totally okay – if not a necessity of political survival, to throw them under the bus.

For these reasons as well as many others, we implore Anthony Gemma to drop out of the race. He cannot win; he can only do damage to the party he says he supports and, truth be told, he’s kind of embarrassing himself.

Which is too bad, because Gemma is a smart, super hard worker who is genuine and good and who wants to do right by his community. Electoral politics just doesn’t seem to be his bag.

I expect he’ll find more far more success if and when he starts some sort of local liberal think tank or online media venture – either would suit his skill set better than running for office, probably would have a greater impact on Rhode Island and could be done for a fraction of the cost. And, he’d get to be a hero rather than a spoiler.

RI Progressive Dems Endorse Cicilline


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Recently, the Rhode Island Progressive Democrats interviewed both of the candidates running in the Congressional District 1 Democratic primary race, incumbent Rep. David Cicilline and challenger Anthony Gemma.  Each candidate was asked the same questions and below are their video responses.  When the endorsement vote was taken, David Cicilline received the unanimous endorsement of the Rhode Island Progressive Democrats.  As you watch the videos, and read the summaries, you’ll understand why.

Cicilline is a well-polished candidate, being in public service for roughly 15 years, first as a State Representative, then Mayor of Providence, and now as U.S. Congressman.  Gemma is not as well-polished and at times seems uncomfortable with the questions being asked.  While in some of the questions Gemma and Cicilline give similar and even identical responses. In virtually every set of questions Cicilline is the more progressive and forward-thinking candidate.

I commend the Rhode Island Progressive Democrats for the level of sophistication and detail embodied in these questions and  for really pushing the candidates to give detailed answers.  And with that….

Economy:

Cicilline:

Rep. Cicilline supports President Obama’s Jobs Act.  He states that America needs to rebuild its infrastructure and asserts that such an  effort will generate huge payoffs in the number of jobs due to the employment of construction workers and in the supply of goods and services that are required to rebuild America.  He envisions a modern day version of the WPA.  He has co-sponsored the National Infrastructure Bank legislation and feels there has never been a better time than now to borrow money and get this done due to historically low rates.

Secondly, the country needs to reinvigorate American manufacturing and expand on the great base that exists in the US by putting in place policies that actually support the manufacture of American-made goods rather than incentivizing the offshoring of American manufacturing overseas.  In Congress he has introduced a set of bills to “Make it in America.”  These include a national manufacturing strategy, legislation to address the manipulation of Chinese currency, and ending tax break to companies that ship jobs overseas.  Cicilline voted against trade agreements because they lacked the protections for American jobs, and while some labor- intensive manufacturing will never come back to America, many other types will return if the incentives to ship jobs overseas are removed.

Finally, the country’s small businesses need access to capital and a skilled workforce which require investments in training programs and education from Head Start through to Pell grants for post-secondary education.

To pay for much of this, the country needs to end the war in Afghanistan and redirect those funds to do “nation building” in America.  Business owners need customers with money to buy the goods and services that businesses produce, and the only way this will happen is with a strong and thriving middle class.

When asked about Stimulus Spending versus Deficit Reduction, Cicilline spoke to how austerity has severe consequences that are now playing themselves out everywhere.  In the short term, we need to make investments now to create jobs, combined with a long-term strategy to reduce the deficit in a balanced way by cutting spending and increasing revenue.  He also supports Quantitative Easing.

Gemma:

Gemma states that he is the only candidate who has created jobs in the private sector.  His jobs plan rests on several “pillars” including:

  • “Health and Wellness” industry: A high growth area in RI that includes the manufacturing of equipment and supplements.
  • “Education” as a path to creating jobs by increasing enrollment at the universities although he is unclear as to how he would convince the respective colleges to take in more students, admitting that he has not approached any of the colleges to discuss this aspect of his plan.  Students spend lots of money locally, so having more students enrolled should equal more money spent locally.
  • Alternative energy and green industry
  • Advanced manufacturing
  • Travel and tourism
  • Infrastructure

Gemma states that his plan will create at least 10,000 jobs in RI over five years at the low end, but he thinks it could be as high as 30-40,000 jobs.  He also assumes that much of the funding will come from foundations and private money since Congress is resolute in not investing in job creation.  Many of his proposals assume things that may not actually be possible however, such as increasing enrollment at Brown University by 10,000 students, and not contacting Brown University about this.

When asked about Stimulus Spending versus Deficit Reduction, Gemma’s #1 priority would be to reduce the deficit, using a balanced approach of tax increases and earned benefit cuts.  When asked about Quantitative Easing, he said it is ok, although he is concerned about the inflationary effects of printing more money (although inflation is at super low rates).

Healthcare:

Cicilline:

Cicilline believes that everyone should have access to quality, affordable healthcare and references a public option and a single payer system as models that would ensure affordability and access.  The healthcare reform legislation includes components of a good system: enabling children to stay on parents’ plan until 27, no denial of pre-existing condition or monetary caps, etc.  The cost of healthcare, while important, is a systems question not a provision question.  In order to lower costs, however, the system should be able to negotiate prices with drug companies like the VA system can, and there should be investments in wellness and technology.  America cannot reduce the level of care and must ensure that everyone has access.  We pay for universal care now due to emergency room visits, but there is a much less expensive way to handle this through universal coverage.

Gemma:

Everyone should have HC, but affordability is the biggest issue.  As President of Gem Plumbing, insurance premium rates were growing rapidly, so he created a program call Benefits by Design that incentivized employees to be healthier and engage in preventative measures.  The current HC system is lacking in preventative measures.  We should incentivize people to be healthier and take responsibility for their own health. Gemma did not endorse a single payer system, although he states that he would have voted for healthcare reform and the public option had he been in Congress at the time.

Education:

Cicilline:

We need to be serious about investments in early childhood education as they are the best investments in children we can make in terms of educational outcomes.  We expend a lot more later on for remediation because of our failure to spend enough on the early years.  Invest early for every child in the country to maximize the return on investment for children’s learning.

Build a system that cares for children from when they wake up to when they go to sleep. They need a learning environment created to provide learning experiences outside of school.  Look at AfterZone and the PASA.  Kids need the support, especially those in households in which both parents are working, or parents are working multiple jobs, etc.

Charter schools have some great examples, but the innovative ideas are not being transplanted to the public school system, nor are charters held to the same standards.  Different learning environments are great for children, but the majority of children will be taught in public schools.  We cannot abdicate our public responsibility for teaching children.

Public money should never be spent on the private school system.  Public school choice presumes that parents have the same capacity and information about their child’s education, so the system will likely not work as theorized.  Rather, every public school should offer every child a high quality education.

The funding of school based on property taxes has created segregated school districts where the wealthiest areas have the greatest capacity to invest in their public schools compared to poor neighborhoods.  Ed quality should not be based on zip code.  A state funding system should help remove that inequality.

Gemma:

Every available dollar needs to be invested in public education.  Certain cities have failed their students and multiple generations due to underperforming school system.  Re-educate adults who cannot read and write and make them more productive members of society.  He believes in school choice for both public and private schools, funded by public money, and is supportive of Head Start and charter schools, claiming there are models that work. He cites the Mayor of Cumberland as a person who has a vision of education with which he agrees, although he doesn’t explain exactly what that means. He is also supportive of equal funding.

Taxation Policy:

Cicilline:

Raise enough revenue to do the things we need to do and those who have benefitted the most from this country should pay a proportionally larger share than those who earn the least.  He supports progressive taxation.  Growing inequality is exacerbated by taxation policy that taxes the wealthy less than other workers.  All income, however it is earned, should be treated equally rather than providing favoring tax rates for hedge fund managers and those who earn income by already having wealth, and taxing other workers at a higher rate.

Cicilline supports a financial transactions tax to limit the destabilizing speculation that occurs in financial markets and has cosponsored two bills to limit oil speculation.  Supports new tax brackets for higher earners.  Supports letting the “Bush Tax Cuts” now the Obama Tax Cuts expire for people earning over $250,000, although he feels there is some legitimate concern about those earning between $250,000 and $1 million that should be acknowledged.

Gemma:

Gemma believes that the tax cuts for those making above $100,000 should expire (this is roughly 20% of the CD1 population), while those making less than $100,000 should see their current tax rates maintained.  Additionally, Gemma feels that those making less than $50,000 should see their taxes decrease.  Capital gains should be divided into two “buckets.”  Bucket 1 = zero cap gains taxes for new business creation that exist for more than 3 years and which create jobs.  Bucket 2 = phased in capital gains taxes to higher pre-Bush tax cut level in order to limit disruption to stock market.  Gemma feels that oil speculation is a major problem, but his response to having a financial transactions tax is unclear.

Foreign Policy:

Cicilline:

Cicilline only supports military actions in foreign nations when it is necessary to protect the national interests and security of the people of America.  He is a strong advocate for ending the war in Afghanistan and did not support military action in Lybia.  Syria is a challenging question due to the slaughter of innocent people and human rights abuses.  America has some moral responsibility to take actions to protect human life, even though we cannot do it everywhere.  Ideally, the US as part of a global coalition, can play a role in preventing these types of abuses.  In the Sudan, the US should play a role, but we have not currently done so.

Drones change the way the military thinks about warfare.  When people went onto the battlefield, limits were placed on interventions.  The depersonalization of drone warfare impacts the frequency of it.  The decision made about when, and against whom, to use drones are difficult to reconcile with basic constitutional tenets.  There needs to be some oversight of President’s kill list so that the people who are targeted are actually intending to do harm to the US, although any system like this would be an imperfect system.  Cicilline opposes indefinite detention and believes the defense budget should be cut.

Gemma:

Gemma does not support interventions in Iraq and Lybia but does support military action in Afghanistan.  Syria is a deep concern, although he feels that we don’t know everything so much of this is speculation.  Gemma feels that military action should be a last resort.  He is opposed to indefinite detention.

Campaign Finance Reform:

Cicilline:

Rep. Cicilline is cosponsor of several bills aimed at reforming the way campaigns are financed.  The Disclose Act requires the identity of donors to Super PACs to be made almost immediately so people know who is behind campaign ads.  Cicilline cosponsored two constitutional amendments to overturn the Citizens United decision and does not believe that corporations are people.  He proposed legislation, the Fair Elections Act, which would create public financing model for campaigns.

Cicilline believes the biggest challenge facing America right now is the funding of elections, and if we want to fix any of the other problems, we’re talking about we need to address how campaigns are funded and by whom.  The influence of big money and secret money devastates our democracy.

Gemma:

Gemma supports an amendment to repeal Citizens United.  Gemma does not accept PAC money and has self-funded much of his campaign.  He believes there should be public funded campaigns so that more people can run.

Environment

Cicilline:

Rep. Cicilline believes that it is critical to protect the EPA so that it can enforce clean water and air regulations, make serious investments in clean renewable energy, and support local farmers.  He is opposed to the Keystone Pipeline, stating the very serious environmental concerns attached to the project, maintains that the jobs numbers are inflated, and that it is unlikely to reduce energy costs.  He points out that Republicans even defeated an amendment to ensure that the oil running through the pipeline would stay in the US.

Cicilline supports reinstating tax credits for renewable energy projects and extending them for longer periods of time so that there is more stability in the funding of long-term renewable energy projects. He suggests that we could eliminate the $40 billion in subsidies to oil companies and invest that money in renewable energy technology.  Cicilline believes that over time it may be possible to phase out nuclear energy if sufficient investments are made in the development of renewable energy technology.

He is skeptical of ethanol subsidies and supports labeling of genetically-modified foods and milk derived from cows injected with Recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone.

Gemma:

Gem Plumbing has invested in sustainable energy and personally, Gemma is passionate about the environment and sustainability.  Gemma believes the Keystone Pipeline project should move forward, as long as it has the correct environmental protections. To lessen burden on foreign oil overseas, he said, the US should import more oil from Canada.  He believes the dirty tar oil may be able to be burned cleaner.

Gemma supports reinstating tax credits for renewable energy projects, ethanol subsidies, and the labeling of genetically modified foods and milk derived from cows injected with Recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone.

Progressive Caucus:

Cicilline:

Rep. Cicilline will remain a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus.

Gemma:

Gemma would join the Congressional Progressive Caucus.

Layoffs Could Cause Crisis for Unemployed Rhode Islanders


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Recently, the DLT has been informed of an unprecedented reduction in workforce. Up to sixty-nine employees are scheduled to lose their jobs on July 28th, 70 percent of these are to come from the Unemployment Insurance sector. The irony of going from working to serve unemployed citizens in their time of need, to being one of those in need of such assistance is not lost on us. This layoff is guaranteed to significantly decrease the department’s ability to provide the necessary level of customer service.

The bottom line is this: Rhode Island’s employment situation is not improving quickly and this mass layoff of frontline workers is going make more acute the pain unemployed Rhode Islanders are already feeling.
At 11% unemployment Rhode Island already has the second highest jobless rate in the country. The Rhode Island Department of Labor & Training provides that assistance with its divisions of Income Support and Workforce Development for the approximately 62,000 Rhode Islanders out of work.

At its current staffing levels, DLT is already it struggling to keep up with the demand for services. I know this because I work as a Senior Employment & Training Interviewer with Unemployment Insurance. I am one of the many representatives that work hard to ensure fair and timely processing of payments within the increasingly complex system of jobless benefits.

The cutback in staff will exponentially delay benefits payments to those facing extreme hardship. It will hold back dollars from flowing into economically starved local economies. Entire specialized sectors of benefits specialists could be eliminated, including but not limited to the already challenged office dedicated to processing military claims. This will lead to extremely long delays in benefits to those men and women in uniform, returning from service. Our veterans have honorably served our country and are owed the highest quality of service the state can provide.

Finally, the State of Rhode Island is a direct reimbursable employer. This means that they are responsible to pay the employees that they lay off dollar for dollar when these employees file for Unemployment Insurance. This burden falls ultimately to the taxpayer. Therefore, Rhode Island’s taxpayers will be on the hook for upwards of one million dollars in benefits paid out to laid off DLT staff to perform no services to Rhode Island citizens. This estimation does not include subsidizing health insurance for the out of work employees and their families. I know, personally, my wife and infant daughter will be forced to seek public assistance to help pay the high costs of staying insured.

Is there a solution? I think so. The state of Rhode Island needs to create a plan to find and allocate funds to maintain appropriate staff levels at the DLT. When a house is on fire one does not take the firefighter’s hose and replace it with a watering can. Rhode Island is our house and it is burning. Rather than reducing the economic stream that can help contain this fire and eventually extinguish the blaze, the state needs to locate the funds and allow them to flow to where the fire burns brightest: the people who need it most.

Spamthony Gemma: A Business Plan for RI

Spamthony Gemma

Greetings! My name is Spamthony Gemma. I’m running for Governor Congress because I have a scheme plan to create 10,000 jobs in Rhode Island. Rhode Island needs more businessmen like me, Mitt Romney, and Don Carcieri to get this state back on track.

Let me take a moment to present you with a business opportunity.

Low risk – High return – Work your own hours!

Now’s your chance to get into the recession proof spamming industry! I’ve been having great success in the spamming industry and I want you to get in on a piece of the action. Here’s how it works!

First, I will stop buying my 500,000+ facebook fans from 3rd party vendors and will begin hiring Rhode Islanders to create fake facebook profiles. You can then use your fake facebook profile(s) to spam your friends about useful things such as plumbing services (hint: toss in a few hundred inspirational quotes and photos). You can even take it to the next level and start spamming blogs like this one!

This is just the ground floor – there’s plenty of room to move on to bigger and better opportunitie$$$. Anyone can take advantage of these emerging trends of the 21st century! I hope you’ll join me so that we can get our state back on track – together.

P.S. Vote for me, Spamthony Gemma!

This is a satirical parody posted by a member of the RI Future community.

Activist Abel Collins Challenges Langevin


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Abel Collins feels he hasn’t heard enough about financial reform from either U.S. Rep. James Langevin (D-R.I. 2nd District) or his prospective Republican challengers in November’s election.

The program manager for the Sierra Club’s Rhode Island chapter is unhappy enough about the situation to jump into the race himself as an independent candidate. The 2000 Brown University graduate and lifelong South Kingstown resident will officially announce his candidacy Wednesday at 3 p.m. on the south steps of the Statehouse. (In case of rain, another location will be announced. The campaign’s website is electabel2012.com.)

“It’s not about challenging Langevin,” Collins says. “It’s about challenging the two-party structure.”

Collins hopes to bring the issues of Wall Street malfeasance and campaign finance reform to the fore, which hasn’t happened yet in either of Rhode Island’s congressional campaigns.

“Both parties’ hands-off approach caused it, and the legislation they’ve enacted has done nothing,” he says. “There have been no prosecutions, and the total lack of responsiveness made me want to get involved.”

While admitting “I never stayed overnight,” Collins assisted with last year’s Occupy Providence action.

“I was one of the moderate voices,” he says.

Collins seeks greater enforcement of existing financial legislation and RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) prosecutions for insider trading, in addition to the restoration of the Glass-Steagall Act limiting interstate banking and the promotion of community and state banks. His platform also includes promoting public financing of campaigns, green initiatives and fair trade policies.

A graduate of South Kingstown High School before majoring in political science at Brown, Collins lives in the Matunuck area with his family and credits growing up around a beach with farmland nearby for his lifelong interest in environmental issues. With the Sierra Club, he has lobbied for public transportation improvements and the encouragement of walking and bicycling in local communities.

“I tried a lot of different jobs after college,” says Collins, who worked as a letter carrier, in construction and as a poker dealer before turning to environmental activism six years ago. “With the position at the Sierra Club, I really found my home.”

He has also served as a field manager for Clean Water Action, and membership and outreach coordinator at Apeiron Institute.

Collins says his campaign’s biggest goal is to bring a voice from outside the two major parties into the political debate.

“I want to demonstrate that it’s possible to campaign as an independent using the community tools available now,” he says.

Live Video: Sen. Whitehouse Talks Obamacare with Center for American Progress


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse will be talking health care reform and Obamacare this morning on a discussion being webcast live by the Center For American Progress this morning at 9:30. You can watch it live here.

Rhode Island’s junior senator will be joined by Neera Tanden, president of Center for American Progress, Richard J. Gilfillan, M.D., the director at the Innovation Center of Medicare and Medicaid Services Ezekiel J. Emanuel, a vice president for global initiatives at U. Penn and a senior fellow with Center for American Progress.

According to the Center for American Progress(which you can follow on Twitter at @CAPCongress) they will talk about: “Which payment models show promise? How are private payers and health care providers changing? Is the recent slowdown in health care spending solely the result of the recession, or have payment and delivery system reforms also played a role? Are we on the cusp of a new era for our health care system? How can payment and delivery system reforms be accelerated and expanded?”

It’s a Showdown in CD1


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
(via Wikipedia)

Elections didn’t used to be this way in Rhode Island. If you ran for federal office and won, you were pretty much guaranteed an unassailable position from which to plot your next step in life; be that a higher federal office, a cabinet position, retirement, or death. In fact, for roughly three out of four of our federal officers, that’s still pretty much the case. But our newest addition to our federal delegation isn’t finding it so easy.

Yes, the latest news out of WPRI’s pollster Fleming & Associates is that incumbent U.S. Representative David Cicilline has a 4.3% lead among likely primary voters over challenger Anthony Gemma, with 19.9% of voters undecided. Rep. Cicilline triumphed with a 14.1% lead over Mr. Gemma and slightly larger leads over David Segal and Bill Lynch in 2010; a year that had older voters motivated in a right-wing backlash against Barack Obama and the Democratic Party.

The poll ultimately shows that Rep. Cicilline draws strong support from 18-39 year-olds, and has an advantage among female voters. It also shows that according to voters, his apology hasn’t had much impact or made them less likely to vote for him. However, the key issue that 45.7% of voters cared about was “Economy/Jobs”. “Providence Finances” came in fifth at 7.3%, behind “Best Chance to Win in November” (7.9%), “Experience” (11.3%) and “Character” (23.8%).

The good news for Rep. Cicilline is that his job approval ratings are higher among primary voters than the general electorate; in February, just 19.6% of registered voters said that Rep. Cicilline’s job performance was “Excellent” or “Good”. Among likely primary voters, that number is 32.1%. Not stunning, but not terrible either. And since 33.8% of voters rank his performance as “Fair” (whatever that means), there’s a cushion there.

The other good news, one that cuts both ways, is that Anthony Gemma remains an unknown quantity to most primary voters, 45.4% said they didn’t know enough to give him a favorability rating. Among those who did, 37.7% ranked him as “Very” or “Somewhat Favorable”. WPRI’s Joe Fleming points out that this allows Mr. Gemma to build himself up, or alternatively, allows Rep. Cicilline to tear him down.

Anthony GemmaMr. Gemma Trying To Ride Two Horses At Once

Mr. Gemma has had some serious issues already. Beyond the initial SNAFU when his announcement devolved into him abandoning it in an attempt to avoid the press, Mr. Gemma has been embroiled in trouble over whether he’d be a sore loser if he fails to triumph in the primary in September; and lingering questions of just how committed he is to the Democratic Party. After a meeting with the Democratic City and Town Committee Chairs Association, Mr. Gemma was blasted by Tiverton Democratic Town Committee chair Mike Burk, who claimed that Mr. Gemma would mount an independent campaign if he lost. Portsmouth Democratic Town Committee chair says that Mr. Gemma said he’d merely write his own name in.

But beyond the he-said, he-said of that particular exchange, Mr. Burk also claimed that Mr. Gemma’s 2012 campaign was reminiscent of his 2010 campaign, which sounded more like he was running for governor than for U.S. representative. Indeed, he’s promised 10,000 jobs to Rhode Island, a claim which sounds far-fetched even if he was running for governor, much less a junior representative in a party likely to be in the minority in the 113th Congress.

Also undercutting him is a problem of insincerity. Having claimed to be the progressive in the race, Mr. Gemma comes from a strong business background, one that was cited for 32 labor violations. He did not vote in the 2008 Democratic presidential primary (one of the closest presidential primary races in recent history), and only affiliated as a Democrat prior to his first run in 2010. He also has said that he is anti-abortion, but would not vote against a woman’s right to choose. Which doesn’t signal strong convictions more than it signals a willingness to do what’s necessary to get elected; a criticism Mr. Gemma has lobbed against Rep. Cicilline on more than one occasion.

Brendan Doherty Lies Waiting in the General

Regardless of which Democrat wins, they’ll run up against Republican Brendan Doherty. Between a WPRI Newsmakers interview where he came out in favor of letting all of the Bush tax cuts expire and a recent statement that he favored the reinstatement of Glass-Steagall to separate commercial and investment banks, Mr. Doherty now has an economic policy far to the left of many Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives. It should be noted he also has said he favors “right to work” legislation and that Rep. Cicilline has signed onto a bill to reinstate Glass-Steagall and supports ending the Bush tax cuts for those earning more thant $250,000 a year.

But Mr. Doherty’s statement on Glass-Steagall (repealed in the early 1990s under the neoliberal bonanza of the Clinton presidency) raises the specter of accusations during his primary campaign that he was merely a Republican-in-name-only, something which is not helped by Mr. Doherty also having a lead among unionized workers versus Rep. Cicilline in the last poll in which they were matched.

If the economy remains the number one issue for voters, Rhode Island’s Congressional District 1 may have a thunderous battle over economic policies that tilt towards the left if Mr. Cicilline makes it through. On the other hand, Democratic primary voters may face a more traditional interventionist vs. laissez-faire economic debate.

It used to be that federal office in Rhode Island was a secure perch. But even if Mr. Cicilline fails to survive this, his successor, imperfect as the leading two candidates for it are, may face a similar struggle in 2014.

With Little Proof, Gemma Claims Progressive Mantle


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Anthony Gemma

Anthony GemmaThe Democratic primary between Congressman David Cicilline and challenger Anthony Gemma will likely be decided by Providence voters and progressives. As such, it should come as no surprise that Gemma is claiming the mantle of being the more liberal candidate in the contest.

“I’m every bit as progressive and as liberal as David Cicilline,” Gemma told me on Friday. “If progressives would look under the hood, they would see I’m their guy.”

He said he supports the DREAM Act, marriage equality and even decriminalization for small amounts of marijuana. He says he’s personally opposed to abortion, but promises to never vote against a women’s right to choose. On tax policy he talks like a progressive, calling the GOP House budget “draconian” and saying he the supports the Buffett Rule, rolling back Bush era tax cuts and even keeping in place estate taxes, though all in the name of lowering the deficit rather than investing in society for its own sake.

But Gemma, a businessman who grew his family plumbing empire into a multi-million dollar a year business and also ran a marketing and communications firm, can be hard to believe at times.

He’s also promised to create 10,000 jobs for Rhode Island in five years by bringing together public and private sector leaders to build upon a business plan he drafted for the 2010 campaign and is retooling for this one – it’s long on platitudes and short on policy proposals. Almost no one thinks such a lofty goal is a realistic campaign promise coming from someone who would be a rookie congressman, but Gemma confidently asserts he can use his team-building skills to get it done.

He’s never held public office, so he’s got no track record. And furthermore, he only registered as a Democrat a few short months before announcing his candidacy in 2010, and didn’t vote in the 2008 primary. He once donated to the campaign of conservative Republican Don Carcieri.

“I gave him a donation because I was running a business and he was definitely the pro-business candidate,” he said of Carcieri, though he said he didn’t vote for him and has never voted for a Republican.

Gemma said he supports organized labor “when unions support Rhode Island,” but again, his track record is at best, tarnished. Gem Plumbing was cited for 32 labor violations, which was “later reduced to six over the objection of the chief inspector,” according to the Associated Press, for hiring non-union plumbers when he was president of the company.

“I don’t recall exactly what happened because it was such a long time ago,” he said. “Our company was growing so fast at the time we my have made some mistakes along the way.”

Even his social networking success is suspect, a case RI Future first made in this piece: Gemma’s Suspicious Facebook Followers. He’s got more than 900,000 followers on Twitter and more than 100,000 friends on Facebook. But ask him how he amassed such a following, and he’s not talking.

“Strategically, there are ways in which to deal with social networking that I would like to write a book about,” he said. But added, “I choose not to talk about strategy during the campaign.”

He did say that it’s “certainly possible” that some of his Facebook and Twitter followers are not real people but said he has “never done the research to know how many are real and how many are fake.” When I asked if he paid for automated follows and Facebook friends he said, “Again, I’m not going to about strategy.”

So we’ll have to wait for the book to find out how he got more than 40,000 Facebook likes in one day, or why he has so many followers from Germany, Spain, Indonesia, and Dubai.

It’s not unlike how he invited reporters to a Sunday evening availability then declined to answer questions from them. Gemma seems to enjoy controlling the message, and one has to wonder if he’s doing that with his new-found fervor for progressive policy positions as well.

Reed, Cicilline Speak Out on Student Loan Debt


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Rhode Island’s congressional delegation is getting in on the ground floor of the fight over student loan interest hike. Last week, the House passed a bill that would keep interest rates low but at the expense of health care programs for women.

Sen. Jack Reed, author of a bill that would prevent Stafford Loan interest rates from doubling this summer made these statements last week:

And Congressman David Cicilline will be meeting with Rhode Islanders tomorrow in a “call to action” on the “threat posed by escalating student loan interest rates.”

Here’s the full press release:

U.S. Congressman David Cicilline (D-RI) will host a call to action along with Rhode Island students, parents, stakeholders, and business leaders to highlight the threat posed by escalating student loan interest rates.  The call to action will take place next Tuesday, May 1st, at Rhode Island College, Student Union, Room 307, 600 Mount Pleasant Avenue, in Providence at 10:00 AM.

With interest rates scheduled to double from 3.4% to 6.8% on July 1st, if Congress does not act, more than 7 million students are expected to incur an additional $6.3 billion in repayment costs for the 2012 – 2013 academic school year.  These increased costs would make college access more difficult and impose an additional financial burden on many young people and families already struggling in a difficult economy.

Congressman Cicilline is a cosponsor of H.R. 3826, which would prevent student interest rates from doubling; he spoke at length about the importance of this issue, along with Congressman Joe Courtney and Congressman Tim Bishop, on the House floor last Wednesday; and, next Tuesday, Cicilline will be joined by a coalition of students, parents, stakeholders, and business to leaders who will urge Rhode Islanders to submit their stories about student loan debt through the Congressman’s website at http://cicilline.house.gov/share-your-story, as part of an ongoing effort to pressure House Republican leadership to take action to protect students from this doubling of interest on their loans.  The freshman Congressman from Rhode Island plans to deliver these submissions to the House Republican leadership later this spring.

Cicilline Bill Would Target Rampant Oil Speculation


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Congressman David Cicilline introduced a bill today that would curb rampant speculation in the oil markets, which would both drive down the price at the pump and put the petroleum economy back in line with the laws of supply and demand, he said.

“If you look at what has happened in the market, production is up and demand is down,” Cicilline told me today. “So the market is not working right. And a substantial piece of this is excessive speculation. Wall Street is using oil futures as a gambling casino.”

Though they’ve inched back down recently, oil prices have skyrocketed in 2012. The national average has climbed from $3.34 in mid-January to $3.87 today. In Rhode Island during that same time period, the average price of a gallon has gone from $3.50 to $3.97.

During the gas price spike in 2008, the exact same piece of legislation passed the House by an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 402-19.

The bill, which is co-sponsored by Congressman Maurice Hinchey (D-NY) and Congressman Raúl Grijalva (D-AZ) would compel the US Commodites and Futures Trading Commission, the entity that regulates such speculation to put new rules into place to negate the effects of speculation on the price at the pump.

Cicilline said the CFCT could set greater limits on how many future shares one entity could own at a time or set limits on how much of the oil market could be designate for futures trading.

“This is dangerously reminiscent of what we saw in the housing market when Wall Street was using very sophisticated tools to drive up prices,” he said. “We’re not powerless to respond to this crisis.”

The futures market controls about 80 percent of all crude oil, said Gary Gensler, the Chairman of the CFTC, recently. Cicilline added that that percentage has doubled in the past decade and shortly before that futures trading controlled only about 20 percent of the market. Cicilline said Goldman Sachs is the biggest holder of crude oil futures.

President Obama called for further regulation on oil speculation earlier in the week. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) is sponsoring similar legislation in the Senate.

Speculation occurs when investors buy “futures” in a commodity such as oil. In effect they purchase a credit to buy a barrel (or many, as is often the case) at a price set now and collect the oil at a future date. If the price is higher than they bought the future share for, they make money. The problem occurs when many investors purchase future shares, artificially driving up the price beyond what it costs to extract, refine and deliver.

Whitehouse Says Buffett Rule Will Be Back


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse has said all along that it would likely take several votes before Democrats could break the hold that Wall Street special interests hold over their republican counterparts and such seems like the fate for the Buffet Rule, which was successfully filibustered Monday on its first vote on the Senate floor.

“I’ll keep fighting to make the Buffett Rule law,” he said in a statement issued yesterday afternoon. “Although we were unable to break the Republican filibuster, a majority of the United States Senate has gone on the record in favor of greater fairness in our tax code.”

Here’s a video of Whitehouse speaking on the Senate floor yesterday:

Prior to the vote, Whitehouse had made a practice of mentioning that oftentimes legislation that would hurt Wall Street special interests needs to come back to the floor several times before Republican Senators will do right by the American people instead of corporate campaign backers.

“We tried to go to the Wall Street reform bill in the Senate and Republicans filibustered it,” Whitehouse told me recently. Majority Leader “Harry [Reid] found a way to call it up again and we lost again. Then Harry figured out a way to call it up again and we lost again. It was either fourth or fifth time it was scheduled for a vote, and we were going to stay up all night to bring attention to this, and at that point the minority leader came in to our leader, Harry Reid, and said, ‘I give up. My guys are getting killed, they are getting phone calls at home. We’re throwing in the towel, you can go to this bill.’ And that was a really clear sign that you can have special interest obstruction that can stop progress on a bill not once, not twice but four times and still in end prevail.”

The Buffett Rule needed 60 votes to break the Republican filibuster and received only 51. Sen. Mark Pryor was the only Democrat to vote against the proposal and Sen. Susan Collins of Maine was the only Republican to vote for it.

Poor Portents in Prospect Park for Anthony Gemma


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Prospect Terrace Park (via Wikipedia)

Having attended Anthony Gemma’s news statement in Providence’s Prospect Terrace Park, I’ll say this right off the bat: I went expecting a more polished candidate than appeared in 2010. I was disappointed.

Let’s get to the big part of it right away: fleeing the conference almost as soon as he was done. By 6:21 pm Mr. Gemma was gone from an event that had started at six o’clock. Many of his supporters had not even gotten to meet the man. He briefly took a photo with a small child, then shook hands with some of Providence’s local politicians before hopping into his SUV and driving off.

This accomplished one thing: it pissed off the media. One veteran reporter said she’d never seen never seen any politician behave that way at a campaign event in nearly two decades of reporting. The moment he stepped into that tinted-window truck, Mr. Gemma had given up two opportunities; winning over reporters and schmoozing with his own supporters. These were people who turned out at 6:00 pm on a Sunday for him; when most are eating with their families. The least he could’ve done was say hello to as many as he could. If that meant taking questions from reporters, well, so be it. That’s being a politician.

Mr. Gemma needs the press more than they need him. For instance, his primary opponent, sitting U.S. Congressman David Cicilline, has actually reached out to the press, inviting WPRI’s “Newsmakers” to enter his home to interview him. He also issues posts on this website.

In 2010, Mr. Gemma won only 23.1% of the vote in the Democratic primary, merely 3% over his nearest rival, David Segal, who had less money to spend. Now that Mr. Cicilline has begun apologizing very publicly for saying Providence was in “excellent fiscal condition” during his last campaign, it’s likely that Segal voters will be keener to jump to Mr. Cicilline’s defense, rather than staying home. Without press coverage, Mr. Gemma loses much of the ability to get out his message other than through advertising. And without making friends of the press, Mr. Gemma makes it that much more difficult to garner positive coverage.

Mr. Gemma was clearly attempting to set himself up as the frontrunner in this race on Sunday. He attacked Brendan Doherty by name, and never explicitly mentioned David Cicilline. I’d say it’s wise for Mr. Gemma not to attack Mr. Cicilline while he’s apologizing (it makes you look like a bully) but Mr. Gemma did make veiled reference to Mr. Cicilline’s apology by attacking it as something he wouldn’t do, completely negating that strategy.

What seems reasonably intelligent is the collection of Providence politicians Mr. Gemma’s gathered; John Lombardi, Davian Sanchez, Wilbur Jennings… though all are problematic. Providence will play a major part in this race. Last time, nearly a quarter of all of David Cicilline’s votes came from Providence. Mr. Gemma placed a distant third in the capital city. Both candidates have to walk a tight path here: Mr. Cicilline’s fate is tied to Providence’s, in many ways. But Mr. Gemma cannot blast the city without alienating its voters, many of whom proudly voted for David Cicilline, some of them twice.

Rep. John Paul Kvale (Farmer-Labor—MN), who once held the deciding vote in the U.S. House.

Beyond that, the clear lack of specifics and the empty rhetoric in the speech betrayed a problematic candidate. Mr. Gemma was the “quirky” candidate in the race last time, sounding like he was running for Governor rather than U.S. Congressman. Let’s be clear: the “control of the House may come down to one seat” argument is unconvincing. It’s only happened once before: in the 72nd Congress when 19 representatives-elect died before taking office and 14 flipped to the Democrats, leaving a sole Farmer-Labor Party member as the deciding vote. This seems unlikely to happen again. However, Mr. Gemma immediately undercut the notion of being a strong Democrat by saying he was willing to buck his party on certain issues.

Mr. Gemma had some intelligent moments. He focused on jobs, though he just said he knew how to create them. But smartest of all, he avoided divisive social issues where he could easily lose support among Democratic partisans. However, since issues like reproductive rights are about to enter center stage in Rhode Island, he must find a way to prevent himself from being lumped into the same category as Brendan Doherty in Democratic minds.

Given both his inability to work the crowd and press, and his occasional stumbles during his speech, Mr. Gemma is clearly an imperfect candidate. Perhaps he has a touch of stage fright. He does not win the award for “most improved” since 2010. That doesn’t go to anyone. There were dark clouds hanging over the Park as Mr. Gemma made his announcement. There’s a dark cloud hanging over this whole race. Democrats should be very worried. Both their candidates are flawed, deeply, but in different ways. Republicans now have their greatest chance to take one of the most liberal districts in the country.

Whitehouse’s Buffett Rule Up for Senate Vote Today


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Sen Whitehouse at a recent rally for the Buffett Rule. (Photo courtesy of Whitehouse office)

After a solid week of Democrats making Sheldon Whitehouse’s Buffett Rule bill the biggest legislative priority in the country, the Senate today will take up the proposal. Seems as if the efforts may pay off as a new Gallup Poll shows that 60 percent of Americans support it.

Today’s vote is a motion to proceed and needs to pass with a 60 vote super majority in order to move to a vote on the bill itself. In other words, Democrats will have to convince at least seven Republicans to vote to allow the bill to come up for a floor vote. That is expected to happen sometime around 5 and 7 p.m. The Senate is scheduled to take up the matter at 2 p.m. Here’s the video from Whitehouse’s floor speech today:

In the meantime, we’ve included a Twitter widget below so you can follow along with what Washington DC and beyond are saying about the Buffett Rule and here are some useful links for catching up to speed:

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse’s op/ed in RI Future on the Buffett Bill. Here’s another op/ed he wrote for the Projo a few days later.

Whitehouse tell me that Wall Street lobbyists will be biggest hurdle to passage. Congressman Cicilline also supports the Buffett Rule. Whitehouse talks about the Buffett Rule with the Center for American Progress.

The Times has a great overview page on the Buffett Rule, with an archive of their coverage. And here’s a link to the President’s weekly address in which he again advocates for it.


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387