Bloody primary or People’s Pledge?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Gina Raimondo and Angel Taveras supporting payday loan reform. (Bob Plain 5/18/12 Click on image for larger version)
Gina Raimondo and Angel Taveras supporting payday loan reform. (Bob Plain 5/18/12 Click on image for larger version)

Maybe we’ll be served well by a bruising Democratic primary. Maybe all the money of the potential principals and their allies will be lined up and thrown against each opponent with the intent to grievously wound. You know, we may well be served by the millions spent in pursuit of a bully pulpit with a veto pen.

Perhaps, as our brawlers approach the fight, Rhode Islands will find assistance in the camps who hurl barbs and provocations; each one doing their be impression of Muhammad Ali. And when they finally go up against one another in the ring; and the victor emerges; bloody, battered, and bereaved; perhaps no Republican will rub their hands in glee.

Maybe voters will forget, between mid-September and early November, the worst of the primary campaign. Perhaps, in that brief October and a half, those of us with nothing more than a vote and an opinion will ignore the accusations, insinuations, and outright lies. Because regardless of who wins, at their hearts and on the ballot they’re still the same shade of blue; and whether it’s one or the other, their money is just as green.

And perhaps it will not come to pass, that talking heads, radio braggarts, and vain bloggers such as I will not cry out “Civil War!” as we are prone to do. Perhaps in will not happen that in 2018, the pundits will not say, “Rhode Island has not elected a Democratic governor in 24 years,” and they will not nod their heads so sagely.

Or… Or maybe reason and sense will come to our would-be leaders. And instead of behaving like two Cold War commanders; locked in Mutually Assured Destruction, each attempting to win with a devastating first strike; they’ll have a moment of sanity, as they so often have appealed to us to find within ourselves.

Then they might set aside whatever distaste for one another they might have, and meet, and take a People’s Pledge. And they could tell us that unaccountable money has no place in the Rhode Island of today, and should that vile spending find its way into our small state the benefactor will donate a sum to charity. And so those who would assist one candidate by tearing the opponent down will find that their sword cuts both ways.

Perhaps our two popular leaders, will set aside the instruments of pain and division which we know have been gathered. And instead of a campaign waged with slings, barbs, and arrows, maybe we’ll be served with one of ideas and vision. And instead of arguing about a Rhode Island which we refuse to let rest in its grave; our once and future leaders will of one yet to be born, built by the heroes we can be, and fit those Rhode Islanders yet to come.

For the past is already done, and the present’s about to be. But the future’s yet unwritten, and that’s all the truth I see.

What Rhode Island should know about hedge funds, part 1


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

hedge fundsWhat’s the purpose of investing in a hedge fund?  Because “hedge fund manager” is almost synonymous with “fabulously wealthy” in the popular press, lots of people think hedge funds are all about high risk and high returns.

Originally, though, hedge funds were thought to provide high returns simply by being consistent, if dull. The idea was that by “hedging” risk with investments whose value fluctuates independently from one another, a good manager could deliver solid but unspectacular results, but do so year after year. 

Since the origination of these funds, more than 40 years ago, the industry has transformed from a handful of conservative investor funds in a relative backwater of the investor world to include funds that follow a much wider variety of strategies, and have trillions of dollars under management. In the process, the meaning of the term has changes, and these days, it just means any unregulated investment fund.

What’s that?  Unregulated?  Well, yes. The SEC, which regulates lots of other Wall Street activity, doesn’t have much to say about hedge funds, except that you have to be a “accredited investor” to invest in one. Essentially this just means you have to be rich enough.

A mutual fund, open to anyone with a dollar, is regulated by the SEC, and is subject to various kinds of disclosure and reporting requirements. Hedge funds, by contrast, only give their clients (usually referred to as fund “partners”, which sounds chummy, doesn’t it?) the information they want to release. If they want to tell you what their returns were, they can. If they don’t, that’s your problem.

Fees are high, too. Where a mutual fund might charge a service charge of one percent or less to its customers’ accounts each year, the standard in the hedge fund industry is 2%, plus a 20% share of any investment gains. Naturally, they do not share in any losses.

Lack of information and high fees?  Such a deal. The reason customers put up with this kind of abuse is the promise of high returns. That’s what makes it so shocking that over the past 20 years, most investors would have made substantially more money by investing in low-interest US government bonds. (This is not just a matter of the 2008-2009 downturn, though that plays a role.)

That’s the message of Simon Lack, whose book, “Hedge Fund Mirage: The Illusion of Big Money and Why It’s Too Good To Be True“, describes his experiences in the hedge fund industry. Lack, a trader at JP Morgan, spent several years investing in hedge funds on behalf of the bank.

JP Morgan did its part to foster the recent flourishing of the hedge fund industry because in the 1990’s, astute traders there noticed the contrast between the weak returns of the industry and the wealth of the managers. The contrast led them to wonder whether they should try investing in a different way. Lack helped start their Capital Market Investment Program, which provided seed money to fledgling funds in exchange for a share of the fees as well as the investment returns. With one foot on the management side of the business and the other with the customers, Lack has a unique perspective on the business.

What he learned was this: The fabulous wealth of hedge fund managers serves as the best possible marketing tool for hedge funds. Look at me, the private jets and penthouse apartments say. I am successful and if you invest with me, you can be too. But he also asked this: where are the hedge fund investors who have become fabulously rich by trusting their money to such managers? And he’s still looking for them.

In his book, Lack points out that a manager can make money when the fund makes money, but that many managers make even more money when a fund’s early good returns inspire lots more people to invest in it. Taking a couple of percent off the flood of new money each year can be much more profitable than hoping for a fraction of the investment gains, and if the fund grows quickly, your wealth can, too, no matter what the returns. The incentives aren’t to nurture your customers money and make it grow, but to expand the business and bring in lots of new money.

What’s more, for a variety of reasons that Lack described, a fund’s growth usually decreases the rate of its returns. A large fund is somewhat more cumbersome and profitable opportunities are not always to scale. So you have managers becoming absurdly wealthy while overseeing a fund whose growth serves their interests, but not those of their customers.

Lack also puzzles over the problem of reporting investment gains. A fund will naturally report its gains in the most flattering light possible. What you might not realize is how much latitude there is for telling the story a fund manager wants you to hear. When reporting returns, a fund might report the growth of the investment pool. But the investment pool can grow both by getting new customers and by investment gains, so that’s not what will be experienced by any individual investor. Plus the shares of a hedge fund can be very challenging to value, and there’s a certain arbitrary nature to any answer to this question.

If a hedge fund invests in bonds, for example, do you value bonds at the price at which they were bought, or the price at which they can be sold?  These prices are different at the very moment the bonds are bought, so we’re not talking about market movements, just about the difference between a bid price and and ask price. Depending on which price the fund manager chooses to use to value the portfolio, it will affect the calculation of the fund returns, though the actual amount of money won’t change.

Furthermore, a customer’s shares might be “worth” some specified net asset value, but they might not be redeemable at that value, due to redemption limitations, withdrawal fees, or some other clause in the “partnership” contract. As I’m sure you can imagine, this is just the beginning of the confusion. The point is that when you buy shares in a hedge fund, you are putting a great deal of trust in the management of that fund, and the management holds all the information in the relationship, and has incentives that are not perfectly aligned with yours. Does that sound like a recipe for success?

Read part II.

Two Teds On Pension Reform Beat


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Their named may be similar but their coverage of Gina Raimondo is not.

New Ted (Siedle, of Forbes) wrote a post on Thursday saying Raimondo is recklessly investing Rhode Island’s pension fund. Old Ted (Nesi, of WPRI), to borrow a phrase, fired back on Friday. New Ted has since posted twice to accuse Old Ted of having a soft spot for Raimondo and – much more pointedly – accusing her of having a soft spot for Wall Street.

From Forbes.com on Saturday:

The fees related to conservative investing range from 1 basis point (one one-hundreth of a percent) to about half a percent. The high-risk alternative investments you have steered the pension into charge exponentially greater fees—fees of about 2% plus 20% of profits or more. Do the math and you’ll agree, the fees the pension will pay have skyrocketed. Mushroomed. Ballooned. Soared.

That’s good for your Wall Street pals, no-so-good for workers participating in the pension. It’s a little difficult to reconcile your opinion that the state’s pension system can’t afford to pay workers the benefits they were promised but, on the other hand, it can afford to pay Wall Street’s wildest gamblers one hundred times greater fees than it has in the past.

Tell Rhode Islanders precisely how much the fees have increased under your leadership (or give me copies of the money management contracts so I can) and let’s see how they feel about it.

Then yesterday:

Raimondo’s overhaul or reform of the state pension will, in the years to come—long after she’s moved on to higher political office, turn out to be disastrous for taxpayers and state workers, in my opinion. Hail Mary passes and other high risk gambles rarely succeed and, even if they do, are not appropriate for pensions thousands of state workers depend upon for retirement security.

New Ted publicly offered 22 questions for Raimondo to answer about how she has managed the state’s the money. Anyone want to bet her answers, or at least political statements tangentially related to these questions, will appear on Old Ted’s blog?

Is Gina Using Taxpayer Money To Campaign?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Much ado has been made about the fact that General Treasurer Gina Raimondo spends a lot of time traveling out of state raising money, gives curious speeches while accepting awards from conservative groups, accepts contributions from SEC violators and maintains friendships with Enron traders.

But I have not read much about the fact that she seems to be using taxpayer dollars to campaign for higher office.

I did notice, though, that Providence Journal investigative reporter Kathy Gregg did sniff out one clear example of this.

Gregg pointed out that Raimondo’s recent “Telephone Town Hall” cost the Taxpayers $1,800 for 8 people to make calls to the Treasurer over a span of 45 minutes.  That is $225 per call of the public’s money.  Can’t you find a lawyer for cheaper than that??

Gregg also investigated the consultant that Raimondo used with this $1,800 in Taxpayer dollarsStone Phones – which turns out to be a company of “political strategists” according to their website.

This leads to an interesting question.  Which 10,000 people did Stone Phones call?  Did they call the voter list?  And, if they did, does that violate campaign finance or ethics laws?

And why is she using Taxpayer dollars to pay a political consultant anyway?

If Raimondo really wants to use your tax dollars to campaign, her time would be better spent supporting Public Financing for RI Elections.

Was Labor ‘At The Table’ For Pension Legislation?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Probably a big point of contention as Rhode Island and its public sector retirees try to mediate a compromise on pension reform will be whether or not organized labor was considered when drafting the legislation.

As few hundred Providence fire fighters, police officers and other public sector union members protested outside a conference for Bond Buyers in downtown Providence today to call continued attention to pension cuts that hurt members’ retirement security, there were some different opinions on this matter.

Inside the conference, General Treasurer Gina Raimondo was telling the room full of bond investors that, “In Rhode Island this was never about Democrat versus Republican, union versus management, labor versus management us, vs them.”

It struck me as odd that Raimondo said pension cuts didn’t pit public sector retirees against taxpayers.

Especially since Paul Valletta, of the Providence fire fighters union, said they are protesting every public event Raimondo appears at because they weren’t at the table.

Here’s what Valletta told me outside:

Inside the conference, Gina Raimondo disagreed with this characterization.

So I asked Governor Chafee, who also spoke at the Bond Buyers conference, to break the tie.

I attended many of the public meetings Chafee and Raimondo held with labor leaders physically at the table. Those public meetings were not where the substance of the actual pension cuts were crafted. That likely happened behind closed doors between Raimondo and legislative leaders before the special session in November of 2011.

Gina Raimondo: Wall Street Democrat


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

We’ve got all sorts of Democrats here in the deep blue Ocean State. We’ve got progressive Democrats, young Democrats, Democrats in name only, we even boasted the lone ALEC Democrat for a spell last year before his constituents through him out of office.

Now add to the list: Wall Street Democrat. That’s the new meme being used to define Gina Raimondo.

We’ve been saying it for a while. But when a post this week about Raimondo hiring a campaign expert to manage the treasurer’s office went viral, GoLocal picked up on the idea for their expose on her fundraising prowess among the banksters. In fact, it’s the most compelling part of their story.

Darrell West of the Brookings Institute told GoLocal: “…New York financial institutions love her position on pension reform. However, in Rhode Island’s political and economic climate, she has to be careful she is not seen as a ‘Wall Street Candidate’.”

It’s entirely warranted, entirely fair and one of most relevant bullets points on the general treasurer/gubernatorial candidates’ resume. Pension cuts, payday loan reform and financial literacy are all important, but so are her deep ties to Wall Street.

Brown political science professor Wendy Schiller makes a great point in the GoLocal article.

“Politicians raise money from the people they know and meet through their jobs – so it makes sense that a treasurer would receive money from financial concerns,” she said.

It also makes sense that, if they want that money to keep coming, they will act accordingly. Gina Raimondo will surely always represent Rhode Islanders above her out-of-state Wall Street donors … the question is how close of a second will the Wall Street donors be.

New Treasurer Staffer Looks Like A Campaign Operative


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

A Smith Hill pol is using the people’s hard-earned money to hire an under-qualified, overpaid staffer.

While this might read like the beginning of every single column Ed Achorn writes about the State House, he probably won’t be waxing eloquent on this one. He only spouts off when a union-centric Democrat commits such a transgression. When it’s Gina Raimondo, a Wall Street-centric Democrat, he’d rather write about the Beatles.

Not Ken Block, though … he might be campaigning himself in calling Raimondo out, but he’s right to do so. The General Treasurer’s office should not be staffed by Gina Raimondo’s political operatives.

“If this person has no relevant experience for running the treasurer’s office and is there mainly as a campaign manager then that person’s salary should not be at taxpayer expense,” he told WPRI’s Dan McGowan last week.

Ed Fitzpatrick reprised McGowan’s post in today’s ProJo, and made it pretty painfully obvious that Raimondo has hired Ed Roos to run her campaign.

Now perhaps Raimondo hired Roos because he studied philosophy at Brown University and published an article in a peer-reviewed journal about “a problem with self-reference and subjective experience.” Or maybe it’s because Roos has been working in D.C. in Google’s “elections and issue advocacy” division.

But a quick Google search shows Roos also was campaign manager for Democrat Myrth York’s unsuccessful bid for Rhode Island governor in 2002, he managed Delaware Gov. Jack Markell’s successful 2008 campaign, and he has worked on gubernatorial campaigns in Iowa, Indiana and Virginia.

So you don’t need a peer-reviewed journal to tell you that campaign experience might have had something to do with his hiring.

I don’t at all dislike Gina Raimondo, but I despise the way she is so often given a break by the local media. If a less fiscally conservative candidate pulled this stunt, the sharks would be circling. If a labor-backed candidate did this, Achorn and et al would be calling for blood in the streets.

To put it bluntly, she is effectively misappropriating public money to help her get a promotion. In other words, she is stealing from the taxpayers for personal gain.

I don’t believe she set out to do this – in fact, I have every reason to believe that in theory Gina Raimondo despises such thievery. But I do believe she is so ultra-ambitious that she lost sight of the fact that she is laundering electoral activity through public sector pay checks.

Blame Gina Raimondo? Not So Fast, Progressives


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Raimondo speaks with retiree
Image courtesy New York Times

Regular readers of the blog know that Treasurer Raimondo has become a lightening-rod for criticism of the state’s recent changes to the public employee pension system.

As a tactic, I’ll admit it’s a good one, simultaneously riling up the base and drawing media attention to the union and retiree’s position. It’s also the first salvo in what’s bound to be a contentious Democratic primary for the Governor’s office. But is the General Treasurer actually at fault? Consider the duties of the office.

Duties
The General Treasurer receives and disburses all state funds, issues general obligation notes and bonds, manages the investment of state funds and oversees the retirement system for state employees, teachers and some municipal employees. She is also responsible for the management of the Unclaimed Property Division, the Crime Victim Compensation Program and the state-sponsored CollegeBoundfund.

Noticeably absent is any mention of negotiating union contracts. That’s simply not her job. What critics would have you believe is that Treasurer Raimondo should have essentially “gone rogue” and usurped the Governor’s duties and possibly those of the General Assembly. L’état, c’est Gina? I’m not convinced. This blog has even gone so far as to suggest that the General Treasurer should be more concerned with “main street” than with the state’s investments and bond rating.

I’ve been a fairly consistent Raimondo supporter, but I was also present at last year’s State House protest adding my voice to the position that the plan asked too much of the neediest pension recipients. In fact I agree, as Rhode Island Federation of Teachers and Healthcare Professionals president Frank Flynn put it, that it’s “not a simple math problem as some people describe it.”  But that isn’t the job of the General Treasurer. For a treasurer, it is a math problem, and we shouldn’t expect otherwise.

And Raimondo spent an inordinate amount of time speaking with voters, union members, and retirees throughout the state before making her proposal. Oddly that’s what now seems to rile opponents. As Paul Valletta, the head of the Cranston fire fighters’ union said, “It isn’t the money, it’s the way she went about it.”

I’m not sure what else she could have done. Valletta is essentially complaining that the General Treasurer acted within the duties of the General Treasurer. That’s what we as taxpayers pay her to do! If the unions and retirees are unhappy with the absence of a formerly negotiated outcome, let’s be honest. It’s the Governor, not the General Treasurer, who’s to blame.

I’ve also been concerned that many progressives seem intent on framing the General Treasurer as some union hating, right-wing ideologue. It’s not a fair characterization given that we know little yet about what priorities Raimondo would bring to the Governor’s office, and what we do know is largely in line with progressive priorities (a social liberal who believes in marriage equality and respects the rights of immigrants). During the Carcieri years, we’d have been thrilled with a candidate with progressive credentials a fraction of hers. Yes, she has been at the forefront of a pension reform movement heralded largely by the fringe right. But to assume that makes her one of the fringe right, ignores how seriously underfunded the pensions have been here in Rhode Island. It’s quite a different thing to enact reform out of a sense of obligation than to do so because of an ideological desire to eliminate them entirely.

Ms. Raimondo also learned early on about economic forces at work in her state. When she was in sixth grade, the Bulova watch factory, where her father worked, shut its doors. He was forced to retire early, on a sharply reduced pension; he then juggled part-time jobs.

“You can’t let people think that something’s going to be there if it’s not,” Ms. Raimondo said in an interview in her office in the pillared Statehouse, atop a hill in Providence. No one should be blindsided, she said. If pensions are in trouble, it’s better to deliver the news and give people time to make other plans.

How much easier it would have been, how much less detrimental to her political future (at least with the progressives of the state) to simply enact some changes around the margins and kick the can down the road for someone else to address (historical the way most pols have handled the problem). Should we as progressives be critical of the Raimondo plan? Absolutely, but let’s not shoot down a potential rising star before she’s even had a chance to announce her platform.

ProJo Stories Show Where Gina Values Transparency


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

There was an interesting juxtaposition of articles relating to pension politics and Raimondomania stripped across the top of A1 of the Providence Journal this morning; one was about the outside money coming into the Ocean State, and the other was about local money leaving.

In the first article, about pension reform politics being funded in no small part by a Texas hedge fund billionaire who used to trade for Enron, Mike Stanton writes, “Raimondo has said she sees no problem with the law that EngageRI doesn’t have to reveal its donors.” (Read our post on this from yesterday)

In the second article, about all the time and money Raimondo has spent outside of Rhode Island, Kathy Gregg reports that Raimondo tells her, “…it is more important than ever that [a] treasurer bend over backwards to be transparent and open with our investors…”

This, in a nutshell, is what most frightens progressives about Gina Raimondo: she so often seems more aligned with the interests of Wall Street than Main Street.

“Raimondo talks about ‘truth in numbers’ — she should tell the truth about who her financial backers are,” said Mike Downey, president of Rhode Island’s largest public sector union, to the Providence Journal.

We ought to be as open with our citizens as we are with our investors. In fact, we ought to be even more open with our citizens than we are with our investors! Any politician would certainly agree with this premise, if asked the question outright. But actions always speak louder than words, and thanks to some good reporting by the ProJo, we now see that Gina doesn’t seem to place the same kind of value on political transparency as she does financial transparency.

Reuters Blog Blasts Raimondo’s Actuarial Acumen


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

(Editor’s note: when I originally posted this item, I mistakenly thought the Muniland post was from this week. It’s actually a year old! But since we posted a similar piece earlier today that spoke to the same issue, I amended it and left it posted. Sorry for any confusion.)

The squeaky clean shine seems to be fading on Raimondomania, in some circles.

The rock star treasurer, hailed for pairing down the retirement benefits of public employees, took a few bruises locally this week for declining to sit down with labor leaders who suing the state over her pension reform efforts. And she’ll take a few more if and when Judge Sarah Taft-Carter asks the two parties to try to work it out among themselves.

She’s taken some in the national media too.

Cate Long, who covers public sector finance for Reuters, wrote on her Muniland blog, “It’s getting a little tiresome to hear all the adulation that’s being heaped on Gina Raimondo…”

Long writes in a post from last December (not this week, as I initially reported):

…the problems Raimondo addressed were not the biggest that the state faced. The main problem with Rhode Island’s pension system is that it has very poor investment returns on its $6.5 billion portfolio of assets. Over the past ten years the state’s  compared with the national median of 3.4 percent (page 6). These returns are in the lowest tier of state pension plans, and this chronic underperformance is causing a substantial shortage of assets to pay retirees.

I’m withholding my praise for Gina Raimondo until the investment returns of the Rhode Island pension plan move closer to the national median. Then state workers won’t have to bear the entire burden.

Here’s what Ted Nesi wrote about it in January.

Greg Gerritt of the Green Party makes a similar point in a post published today on RI Future. Raimondo led efforts in 2011 to lower the expected rate of return from around 8 percent annually to 7.5 percent. In the last fiscal year, Gerritt reports, the return was 1.5 percent.

So maybe I spoke too soon when I said I trusted Gina Raimondo’s actuarial acumen earlier this week. But, way more importantly, shouldn’t this be what the former venture capital millionaire is good at – investing the state’s money?

Long, who focuses on the last ten years of data to make her point, reports that the “major source of pension plan funding, investment returns on plan assets, has been terrible in Rhode Island. I’m not aware of any discussion or changes in the law to address this issue.”

Perhaps pension reform efforts focused too much on contract rights, and not enough on money management. After all, you don’t get taken to court for simply making smart investments.

Story Isn’t Whether to Sit Down, But Who’s At Table


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Sorry, Providence Journal, much as you might not like it, we are no longer debating whether or not the state should be negotiating pension reform with organized labor as your over-hyped headline and otherwise great long-form story on the drama this morning suggests.

Remember, after all, on Tuesday when you broke the news that the governor is, in fact, talking with union leaders about this very topic?

As a point of fact, the executive branch is already at the table. The question at this point is whether or not treasury wants a seat there too.

My guess is Raimondo will eventually join the talks. In fact, Chafee ought to request her presence at the next meeting between he, and labor leaders Bob Walsh and George Nee.

I’m sure all three of these players believe she’d be a valuable voice in those discussions. And, more importantly, our elected leaders shouldn’t shy away from engaging with their adversaries. Remember, talking doesn’t equal acquiescing. Or, sitting down and holding your ground are not mutually exclusive.

As much as EngageRI might not want her to give labor any credence, she ought to listen to the more politically viable advice coming from the likes of Mayors Angel Taveras and Allen Fung, who both told WPRO this morning they would sit down too.

In the meantime,the one thing you can take to the bank is that the local mainstream media will tie itself in knots trying to defend Gina and disparage Linc.

Dueling Letters: Chafee to Raimondo and Her Reply


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Gov. Linc Chafee first floated to Treasurer Gina Raimondo the idea of negotiating with labor on pension reform just three days after the November election, over a pastrami sandwich, during a working lunch between the two political leaders.

A letter from the governor to Raimondo dated November 13 thanks her for joining him for lunch on Friday and asked her to discuss with him further the idea of negotiating a settlement with the unions whose current and past members were hurt by cuts to their retirement plans.

Here is Linc’s letter to Gina:

Dear Treasurer Raimondo (Chafee crossed this out and wrote in “Gina”)

Thank you for lunch Friday. My pastramì hit the spot. And our conversation on current events was lively.  One issue l would like to explore further than our brief discussion at lunch is pursuing the possibility of a  negotiated settlement to the Rhode Island Retirement Security Act litigation pending before the Rhode island Superior Court.

It is common practice for settlement discussions to be held while litigation is proceeding. l would not make this suggestion if I did not believe the result could be favorable to the Rhode isiand taxpayers. And l also  believe I can answer in greater detail some of the concerns you raised on Friday. All litigation has chances of  success and failure and it would be beneficial to our economic standing to have the major court cases associated with pension reform resolved amicably.

I look forward to exploring this further with you and labor leaders when appropriate.

Best Wishes,

Lincoln D. Chafee

Raimondo replied 15 days later. Here is her response:

Dear Governor Chafee,

Thank you for your letter of November l3, 2012. On advice from our counsel, it is not  appropriate to pursue the matters you raised. The legislation passed by the General Assembly represented the culmination of ll months of thoughtful, fact-based analysis and input input  retirees, employees and taxpayers.

As we agree, it would be devastating to the state and the fiscal health of mnany municipalities if  the Rhode îsland Retirement Security Act of 2011 was overturned. And perhaps most importantly, the retirement security of our public employees would again be in jeopardy.

I look forward to conitinuing to work diligently together to defend this important piece of legislation to protect Rhode IslaI1d’s future.

Best Wishes for a happy holiday season.

Sincerely,

Gina M. Raimondo
General Treasurer

Providence Journal reporter Mike Stanton referenced the letters in his piece on Chafee and Raimondo’s disagreement in today’s paper. You can read both letters here.

And here’s the rest of our coverage on this:

Gina Raimondo Should Be at Pension Talk Table


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

I don’t doubt Gina Raimondo’s actuarial acumen. But oftentimes I think her political instincts leave much to be desired. The general treasurer/gubernatorial candidate-in-waiting might be the Democratic darling to the budget-cutting crowd for shepherding pension cuts through the legislature, but there’s a political side to the court challenge too and she has chosen not to participate.

And so as Act 2 of the pension reform drama heats up, Raimondo finds herself on the wrong side of cooperation – as well as political and legal logic – as she effectively argues against keeping open lines of communication with organized labor over the pension war she stoked with its members. That’s not only a bad tack to winning over hearts and minds, it’s at best a counter-intuitive way to kick of a campaign for governor in Rhode Island.

(Read our post from Tuesday about the brewing disagreement over pension reform talks between Chafee and Raimondo)

According to an informative Mike Stanton piece in today’s Providence Journal, Chafee suggested to Raimondo on November 13 that the state try to negotiate a settlement with labor. According to Stanton, Raimondo replied, more than two weeks later, ““On advice from our counsel, it is not appropriate to pursue the matters you raised.”

Chafee, and many others, disagree.

The governor told Stanton, “I don’t see any downside to talking.”

Here’s a potential downside for Raimondo: the folks over at EngageRI wouldn’t like it very much, and it is these upper income corporate sympathizers who can help a rookie general treasurer amass over a $1 million in her campaign coffers two years prior to the election.

Still, it seems most of the other 2014 gubernatorial candidates agree with Chafee. Ernie Almonte told WPRO this morning he thought the state should be talking to labor and Angel Taveras had similar words for RIPR yesterday.  Anyone want to see what Mayor Allen Fung thinks? Oh yeah, that’s right, he’s busy … negotiating pension reforms with organized labor.

Raimondomania, as the adoring media has dubbed Gina’s phenomenal rise, certainly started off with a giant political victory by many accounts. But the legislative process was only the opening act in the effort to reform public sector pension benefits in Rhode Island. The legal obstacles continue to come into sharper focus on Friday. And, evidently, negotiations continued between the executive branch and the pensioners.

Raimondo has chosen not to come to the table.

Progress Report: Defining Moment in Cicilline, Doherty; Ugliest Campaigns; What EG Is Debating; Guy Fawkes Day


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Happy Guy Fawkes Day. Disclaimer: RI Future does not condone and does not like violence.

A defining moment of the David Cicilline v. Brendan Doherty campaign was captured by Phil Marcelo of the Providence Journal this weekend … both candidates were in a South Providence fruit store when a Cicilline “Spanish-speaking emissary,” according to Marcelo, said of Doherty, “He shouldn’t be in this neighborhood. He talks about undocumented immigrants posing a threat to our neighborhood.” Doherty denied the accusation but the woman retorted that it is right there on his website.

Here’s a few of the reasons why this exchange defines the campaign: In so many different ways, Cicilline is running to represent the people who shop at this market, and Doherty is running to oppress them … from immigration to economic policy. Doherty is pretty acutely anti-immigration. He doesn’t support the DREAM Act. But also, Doherty likes to distance himself from his conservative leanings – so much so that he actually claims it’s negative campaigning when Cicilline links him to his own party, let alone his own policies…

That said, if David Cicilline holds on to his seat in Congress it won’t be because of favorable media coverage – this story was buried inside the Sunday ProJo and it’s been pretty disheartening to see the tacit and overt biases exemplified against his campaign – it will be because the 1st District loves liberals. The local media, not so much…

Scott MacKay has some brilliant 11th-hour observations about the election … including dubbing East Providence the Ohio of the CD1 contest.

GoLocal ranks the ugliest campaigns of this cycle … they give the top honor to the Mark Binder/Gordon Fox contest and rank the Cicilline/Doherty race as number 3. Anthony Gemma appears no where on their list.

Speaking of Anthony Gemma, you know the campaign season must be winding down because he has re-followed me on Twitter! Welcome back, Anthony!!

The ProJo Political Scene team eviscerates Gina Raimondo this morning for trying to keep her fundraising efforts secret. Tey report that at least half of the money she raised last quarter came from out of state … who are these non-Rhode Islanders that want Raimondo to be governor, and whose interest do they represent? The state’s or their own?

A great story of a Smithfield farmer who has tripled in size since 2008, without the benefit of any new tax breaks … more evidence that local agriculture is great economic development!!

Not only will the House vote on marriage equality next session if Gordon Fox holds on to the Speaker’s gavel, he says it will vote early too … that means the media will have ample time to press Teresa Paiva Weed and the State Senators (a great 50s’ band name if ever there was one) into doing likewise!! Just a vote, TPW … that’s all we ask!!

Just in case you thought all Rhode Island towns are suffering in these though economic times, take a look at the questions candidates for East Greenwich School Committee are being asked about why they should be considered for office: “Do you favor iPads (or the like) for every EGHS student? If so, how quickly would you like to see that take place? Should the EGSD expand language offerings (i.e. to include Chinese and/or Arabic), even if that means current language offerings would have to be reduced? Are you in favor of high school students starting later?” I’m pretty sure these aren’t the same questions being asked of school committee candidates in West Warwick, Central Falls or Pawtucket…

Coventry fire fighters are the best!! Some of ’em work for free; others deliver babies.

Happy Guy Fawkes Day … on this day in 1605, Fawkes is caught in the basement of Parliament trying to blow the joint sky-high. To celebrate, Anonymous says it’s gonna take down Facebook.

And happy birthday to one of the world’s most progressive (and best?) basketball players of all time, Bill Walton.

Fundraising vs. Good Govt: Which Matters More?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Harvard professor Lawrence Lessig told the Common Cause annual dinner said it’s not enough to reverse Citizens United, but it’s the place to start.

Note the irony that while one prospective 2014 Democratic candidate for governor was making headlines for raising an almost unfair amount of money from corporate interests from outside of Rhode Island, the other prospective candidate was busy not making headlines for being honored by good government group Common Cause RI with its 2012 Excellence in Public Service Award.

Providence Mayor Angel Taveras was honored with the award for “for his work on redistricting, voting rights, and ethics as a community activist, and now as Mayor,” said a Common Cause release about their annual meeting. “The award is given to those who demonstrate integrity, courage and leadership in pursuit of open and accountable government.”

Adding to the irony is that Harvard professor Lawrence Lessig was also at the Common Cause event to talk on the dangers of such unfettered money in our electoral process. If you’re a fan of good government or even just politics, you’ll really appreciate his presentation, which you can watch here:

Dems Unite Around GOP Smear Campaigns


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Brendan Doherty demonstrating uncommon integrity

I’m glad the Rhode Island Democratic party is finally coming together to renounce the incredibly negative campaigning the Republicans have been resorting to. Let’s hope the media picks up on this story.

In my biased opinion, it’s the biggest meta-narrative of the local campaign this year, but I think it has a lot of merit for my brothers and sisters in the unbiased side of the industry as well.

Today at 1pm at Slater Mill all the Democratic heavyweights in the state – Sheldon, Jack Reed, Cicilline, Elizabeth Roberts, Gina Raimondo, Mayor Taveras and Ed Pacheco, among others (Langevin will be taping the WJAR debate) to call upon their Republican counterparts to stop slinging mud and start talking about issues.

It seems like every day either Brendan Doherty, Barry Hinckley or their operatives release a new dirty and misleading advertisement. Hinckley was just given a Pants on Fire by Politifact today for an untrue ad. Doherty’s ads make a pants on fire rating seem like a gold star though. They have literally been among the most atrocious I’ve ever seen. AP writer Michelle Smith does a nice job of summing up the ad here. She writes:

House Republicans are airing a TV ad in Rhode Island linking freshman Democratic Rep. David Cicilline to a child molester and a murderer he defended when he was a lawyer two decades ago.

A Doherty spokesman told Ian Donnis of RIPR earlier in the week that the campaign decided to go negative because Cicilline did first. Tim White chided Doherty when he offered this same flawed logic during a WPRI debate, saying, “you’re basically saying he started it.”

I think it’s laughable that Brendan Doherty calls himself a man of uncommon integrity and then runs this kind of dirty campaign. There’s no reason unbiased political reporters shouldn’t be calling out a candidate for such an obvious contradiction.

This kind of gutter campaigning isn’t good for anybody and Republicans should be held accountable for resorting to such dirty tactics. But, I suppose if they had a message that would resonate with Rhode Islanders, they’d be ringing that bell instead.

Progress Report: Gordon Fox Gets Kicked; Gina’s Coffers; Comparing Pay Grades; Pirate Party, Lawrence Lessig


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Gordon Fox’s reelection battle has become one of the most watched contests in Rhode Island, and Ian Donnis yesterday busted out what I think is the best local campaign journalism of the year summarizing his race against Mark Binder.

“Fewer than 9,000 voters will decide one of Rhode Island’s most important elections on November 6,” reports Donnis. He does a great job of laying out both Mark Binder and Fox’s talking points, but the real gem is the audio he gets of Fox going door-to-door.

A voter says to Gordon Fox: “Do you deserve a good, swift kick in the ass?” Fox responds, “To keep me focused, we all do. We all do from time to time.”

The ProJo’s cleanup hitter Mike Stanton follows that up this morning with a pretty good front page overview of his own.

Here’s why Lawrence Lessig is so prophetic: “The real corruption isn’t the total amount of money raised; it’s the total amount of time spent raising money — not from all of us — but from the tiniest slice of the 1 percent,” he tells the ProJo’s Ed Fitzpatrick. Lessig, a Harvard professor, will speak at Common Cause RI’s annual dinner tonight. Hope to see you there!

Speaking of the inherent issue with political fundraising from the 1 percent, Gina Raimondo already has more than $1 million in her campaign account. It isn’t middle class Rhode Islanders who couldn’t afford to to pay for public sector pensions who are making this big donations … it’s the uber rich who know how good Raimondo’s pension reforms have been for Wall Street and the finance industry.

And speaking of the 1 percent, Tim White takes his annual look at highest paid state workers in Rhode Island. It seems as if for the first time in many moons URI’s head basketball coach won’t be the highest paid public sector employee in the state … not that new coach Dan Hurley doesn’t deserve it. The Hurley Bros are gonna turn our program around!! He’s also a lot of fun to follow on Twitter.

And speaking of the highest paid local folks, we looked into the highest paid CEO’s in Rhode Island back in April. Compare their salaries to the highest paid state workers and then consider which jobs are more important to our society. Then compare both sets of salaries to what you might earn, or what the fire fighter or public works employee who saved your ass during Hurricane Sandy might earn. The reality is one of the biggest problems with the way our economy functions is the utter lack of any relationship between pay grade and job importance. This is ridiculously obvious when you consider what the richest Rhode Islanders “earn” compared to the rest of us. But, according to the laws of corporate-controlled capitalism, those who serve the stock market best get the most money…

As I’ve argued before, farmers should be the highest paid sector of an economy that serves the people … and supporting local agriculture should be the most bipartisan issue in America. It’s great for the economy, the environment, health and wellness, real estate values, even local taxing capacity … to that end, support ballot question 6 on Tuesday.

The ProJo editorial board applauds URI for moving its MBA program to the Capital City, and endorses the idea of partnering with CCRI and move its nursing program to the I-195 land to be closer to Brown. I concur.

I have no idea why, but I thought GoLocal’s look at what local pols gave out for Halloween candy was great journalism.

American Pirate Party, anyone? Sounds pretty good to me…

Progress Report: Pension Politics; Transparency’s Liberal Bias; ProJo for Sheldon; Meatloaf for Mitt; Microwaves


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Autumn foliage is reflected in the waters of Greenwich Cove. (Photo by Bob Plain)

The Atlantic may think Gina Raimondo is a brave thinker for slashing the retirement security of state workers, but it seems to me the political popularity of pension reform is waning  … consider this page A1 quote  in today’s Projo on Cranston Mayor Allan Fung’s attempts to cut local pension benefits: “This problem was created by the city, not by the retirees.”

And consider also that both David Cicilline AND Brendan Doherty both said the state would have done well to negotiate pension reform rather than act unilaterally … but then again Doherty is a pension recipient, reports RIPR. The state pays him $97,859.44 annually to be a retired cop.

On Smith Hill, it turns out, transparency and open government tend to have a liberal bias. I’m not surprised.

Speaking of government secrecy, Bob Kerr offers some sage words for any public official who wants to keep something on the quiet: “…as long as the details are kept under wraps, questions will remain. And those questions will be answered at the bar and on the radio and in all kinds of places where people have nothing to go on but their belief of how things work in Rhode Island.”

Again, the typically conservative ProJo editorial board endorses a progressive for U.S. Senate; today it’s Rhode Island’s own Sheldon Whitehouse.

FYI: the bear seen in Cranston probably wasn’t the same one that was seen in the EG/NK area. For one thing, there is virtually no way for wildlife to commute between the two areas in question. For another, it’s not like we are talking about a singular Sasquatch here folks. It’s a bear, they live here and look for food this time of year. Secure your garbage cans, be prepared to take their picture from a safe distance and get on with life…

Things are looking pretty good for Democrats’ chances of taking control of the Senate, says the NYTimes … but native Rhode Islander Jennifer Duffy is quoted as saying not to count out the GOP yet…

I have to disagree with the Romney logic that microwave ownership is a sign of wealth … to the contrary, I’d argue that microwave ownership is a sign of poverty.

And here’s an indicator in the presidential campaign: Bruce Springsteen endorsed Obama in Ohio this week while Mitt Romney won the coveted endorsement of Meatloaf. In case you’re keeping score at home, Springsteen is famous for singing about the plight of the working class … Meatloaf, on the other hand, is best remembered for signing about indiscretion and regret.

Today in 2001, George W. Bush signs the Patriot Act into law.

Progress Report: Economic Development Void in RI; GOP Fans Father-Daughter Dance Flames; James Diossa


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Downtown Providence from the Providence River. (Photo by Bob Plain)

It seems RI Future and RIPEC agree on at least one thing. “Rhode Island does not have a clear vision of how to expand its economy or a governmental structure that helps create jobs, encourage companies to expand, attract businesses and develop workers’ skills,” reports the Providence Journal about RIPEC’s report on the EDC this morning. We may not agree what to do about it, though. We think the state should invest more heavily into this sector.

The Cranston School Committee last night agreed to petition the state legislature to lift the state ban on father daughter dances. The reality is few people are actually worked up about this and the name isn’t a longstanding tradition in Cranston. It’s just about local Republicans trying to drum up animosity using the ACLU as their boogieman.

Good luck to Central Falls City Councilor James Diossa, who launches his campaign for mayor today.

Here’s Gina Raimondo on NPR’s Talk of the Nation yesterday talking about Rhode Island’s early effort to reform public sector pension benefits.

URI professors, who are teaching without a contract right now, are among the lowest paid college professors in the region, according to the ProJo this morning … yet political pressure from the Chafee Administration prevented them from getting an already-agreed upon pay raise. Stay tuned.

Here’s why Romney is losing.

Hilarious Saturday Night Live skit on some of the questions undecided voters are still asking.

On this day in 1957: “Under escort from the U.S. Army’s 101st Airborne Division, nine black students enter all-white Central High School in Little Rock, Arkansas.”

And on this day in 1690, the first newspaper was published in the new world. It was called Publick Occurrences Both Forreign and Domestick.

Progress Report: Cicilline Surging Against Doherty; GOP for Father-Daughter Dances; Affordable Housing; 47 Percent


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

David Cicilline is surging. After comfortably beating Anthony Gemma in the primary it now looks like he’s comfortably ahead of his conservative challenger Brendan Doherty in polls commissioned by the Democrats. While Republicans, Buddy Cianci and other Cicilline detractors might dismiss partisan polls, it still gives the incumbent an advantage and shows momentum.

We’ll have more on Cicilline’s surge later this morning…

State House Republicans say they will join in the controversy in Cranston about what to call elementary school dances in Cranston (your tax dollars at work?). But this isn’t a partisan issue, as evidenced by David Cicilline’s position on the issue.

Three cheers to Gina Raimondo for using her political capital to advocate for affordable housing funding. She’s pushing for voters to approve a $25 million bond to build and/or rehab 600 units. This is an important economic development opportunity for Rhode Island. Raimondo is a longtime board member of Crossroads Rhode Island and her commitment to homeless people is admirable.

That said, we find it distasteful that she claims pension cuts made it possible to go out to bond for affordable housing. Of course, rolling back tax cuts for the wealthy – a move she objects to – would have a similar effect on the state’s finances. And, it would do so without pitting the working class against itself. In other words, she is arguing that the state needed to take money from teachers and state workers in order to give it to the homeless. Her logic reminds me of railroad tycoon Jay Gould’s famous quote: “I can hire one half of the working class to kill the other half.”

Speaking of class warfare, the Providence Journal weighs in on Mitt Romney’s 47 percent comment with a pretty muddled editorial. More to the point is what the New York Times editorial board said about it: “It turns out that Mitt Romney was right. There is class warfare being waged in the 2012 campaign. It is Mr. Romney who is waging it, not President Obama, and he’s stood the whole idea on its head.” Even the conservative-leaning Washington Post editorial board writes: “Mr. Romney suggests that Obama voters are such sheep that there is no point in reaching out to them — and that their support for Democrats is purely selfish. The possibility that principles might motivate their political behavior does not even occur to Mr. Romney. It’s a demeaning, as well as inaccurate, view of the people he hopes to lead.”

GOP strategists think Romney’s comments could give Democrats the inside track for control of the Senate. And Democrats think it could put them in position to take back the House. Unlike moderate Republican candidates from across the nation, RI GOP candidates have been completely silent on the controversy.

Update: Brendan Doherty has distanced himself from the comments, according to the ProJo.

Happy birthday, Upton Sinclair. The author of “The Jungle” was born today in 1878.

And today in 173, Billie Jean King beat Bobby Riggs in tennis.


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387