Projo Botches Facts in Editorial on Legislative Races


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

How can we trust their opinions if they can’t even get the basic facts right?

The Projo editorial board was so overzealous in its attempt to slam organized labor and the candidates that support them in an editorial on General Assembly campaigns today, it botched several facts.

Here’s the list I could come up with, if you can find any more please add them in the comments below:

  • House Finance Committee Chairman Helio Melo is actually running unopposed.  John Rossi never ended up filing all the required paperwork needed to get on the ballot.
  • Also related to Helio Melo. His last name is spelled “Melo” not “Melio” as the Projo wrote. (Though that would be a pretty fun name to say if it was Helio Melio!)
  • Speaking of spelling errors, they also misspelled Leo Medina’s name. The writer/writers could have simply referenced their own front page from last week for the correct spelling. It’s not like Medina isn’t a known quantity in newsrooms around Rhode Island as of late.
  • Robert Flaherty is not running for reelection this year. While the editorial doesn’t explicitly say he is running for office this year, it is an editorial advocating for which candidates voters should support this year. In the spirit of Politifacting, we rate this statement as half pants on fire because it seemed like a wanton effort to besmirch Flaherty’s name.
  • Update: an astute reader reminds me that, of course, John McCauley is not running for reelection either…

From my vantage point, it frequently seems as if the Projo editorial writers are more interested in trafficking in ideological talking points rather than informing its readers. As a fellow opinion writer, it’s important to do both … but the former doesn’t carry a lot of water until you can get the latter down pat.

Jessica Ahlquist Honored at Touro Synagogue


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

It sounds like the start of a bad joke: a Rabbi, an Imam, and an atheist walk into a Synagogue… 

In this case, though, it is the story of a ceremony at Touro Synagogue in Newport – the 65th annual reading of George Washington’s Letter to the Hebrew Congregation. It was a celebration of Washington’s poignant 1790 letter eloquently stating to Newport’s Jewish community (what was left of it after the British occupation of Newport during the Revolution) that the new country would be committed to religious freedom, to being a nation where the government offers “to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance.” To a Jewish community used to being driven violently from country to country (including from England in the 1200’s, to be welcomed back somewhat reluctantly generations later,) these words meant that the religious tolerance they had found in colonial Rhode Island would continue in the new United States.

The invocation at Sunday’s reading of the historic letter, given by the Imam of a Providence Muslim community, and the benediction given by Touro Synagogue’s Rabbi, remind of us the breadth of this commitment: that the U. S. would be a country welcoming of Jews and Muslims (“Turks” in Colonial era parlance) as well Christians.

As was noted in the introduction of Jessica Ahlquist, the young atheist who successfully fought for the removal of a prayer banner from Cranston West High School, religious tolerance in Rhode Island applied not only to non-Christians but also to those who did not believe. And there were non-Church goers, and likely non-believers, in Colonial Newport along with Protestants, Jews, the occasional visiting “Turk,” and eventually Catholics.

Jessica was there to receive the Judge George Alexander Teitz Award, a non-monetary award from the non-sectarian Touro Synagogue Foundation that is given annually to “an individual or institution that best exemplifies the contemporary commitment to the ideals of religious and ethnic tolerance and freedom, expressed in President George Washington’s 1790 Letter.” Jessica joins the likes of the first recipient of the Teitz award, Senator Claiborne Pell.

She was introduced by Judge Teitz’ son, Andy, who reminded the audience of the threats and antagonism Jessica faced in Cranston for standing up for the Constitution and Separation of Church and State. In accepting the award, Jessica made perhaps the most meaningful statement of the afternoon’s proceedings. In talking about her experience with the Cranston school prayer banner, she said, in reference to this event at Touro, “This is what I wanted to happen, this is what I was fighting for when I did this…”

To see Jessica honored by a community that, while largely holding on to its belief in a supernatural “higher being” also sees the importance of Church-State separation, was a moving experience.

This post was written by Chuck Flippo, site manager at Loeb Visitors Center at Touro Synagogue National Historic Site, with small modifications and formatting by Steve Ahlquist.

Note: The Providence Journal covered this event with a small selection of photos yesterday, completely ignoring the fact that Jessica was honored with a prestigious award at this ceremony. As Chuck told me in correspondence:

[Not mentioning Jessica receiving the award] sounds like a deliberate slight. Though there were certainly other things to write about — the Imam giving the invocation, Sen. Reed’s speech — the award to Jessica was a significant part of the event. [It] should have been included. That’s really poor journalism.

Progress Report: Engage RI, Labor Make Pensions Election Issue; The Paul Ryan, Todd Akin Connection; Generosity


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Fort Wetherill State Park in Jamestown.

If you had any doubt that this year’s campaigns for General Assembly seats would be colored by last year’s pension debate, just look at the news cycle this morning: Ted Nesi reports that EngageRI is attacking those who had the nerve to speak out against cuts to retired state worker’s salaries, while the Projo editorial board condemns organized labor for doing the same.

Thanks to RIPTA for trying to stave off reductions in public transportation. Doing so would certainly be bad for our already struggling economy. Remember, the goal is to make society work well, not for it to be inexpensive.

What do Paul Ryan and Todd Akin have in common: radical beliefs on reproductive freedom.

A new report claims religious people tend to be more generous than the secular folk among us. While they may give more to their church than others do to charities, I don’t buy for one minute that they are holier than the rest when it comes to giving. In fact, WPRO’s Matt Allen points out the last paragraph in the story:  “People in less religious states are giving in a different way by being more willing to pay higher taxes so the government can equitably distribute superior benefits, Wolfe said. And the distribution is based purely on need, rather than religious affiliation or other variables, said Wolfe…”

The state is looking for ideas for the old Shooters building next to India Point Park. As Providence begins its massive redevelopment project, this will be one o the lynchpins to overall success. How about an aquarium?

Poor Curt Schilling … he still somehow thinks it’s Gov. Chafee’s fault he doesn’t know how to run a video game company. In fact, he’s resorted to name calling over the matter. Even the Boston Herald recognizes this isn’t going to do him any good.

Did you hear that Augusta National is finally allowing women to join the exclusive Georgia golf country club? Well, Providence progressive activist Jessica Sherwood called upon them to do so two years ago!

Today in 1959, Hawaii becomes the 50th state.

 

What Does Doherty Think of Akin’s Rape Remarks?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Brendan Doherty

No one in America today is less popular than Republican Todd Akin, who said “legitimate rape” rarely ends in pregnancy because women can cause some sort of self-abortion to occur in their bodies when such tragedy happens. As we reported yesterday morning, it was a ridiculous thing to both say and/or believe.

The fallout: the GOP has pulled back its financial support for his candidacy, and top party brass are either calling for him to drop out, or insinuating that he should.

But I’m a little confused as to Brendan Doherty’s reaction to the news … his campaign told the Providence Journal that Akin should suspend his campaign, according to its report, but it told Ted Nesi he should “drop out.”

It’s well worth noting that the AP reports that it was a call to drop out, but yesterday morning he told WPRO he had no comment until he knew more about it, which later in the day it reported he was “echoing” another Republican’s sentiments, according to its account.

Which is it? I think Rhode Islanders would want him to be pretty solid on such an issue – especially since he’s selling himself as the candidate of morality.

One of the reasons Rhode Island shouldn’t send Brendan Doherty to Congress is because of the people he will have to caucus with while there … if he can’t even call on a complete fool like Todd Akin to get out of politics altogether, what will he – and we – be forced to live with once he needs such people’s support?

Race Is On: Who Will Be the Political Party of the Net?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

At Demand Progress we’ve just launched a public effort to compel the major parties to adopt Internet freedom planks as part of their party platforms.  You can click here to sign our petition to the people responsible for drafting platforms. It buttresses a behind-the-scenes effort we’ve been running for a few weeks, and we’re very hopeful about the chances of winning.  Here’s US News on the push:

In an attempt to woo so-called “Internet voters,” both the Republican and Democratic parties are considering adopting official positions supporting a free and open Internet in their upcoming party platforms at their respective conventions, according to sources familiar with party platform drafting.

There’s a race of sorts on to be the first party to corner Internet voters… and Internet dollars.  The Republicans are doing an unusually good job securing support from Silicon Valley, as US News notes:

Both Republicans and Democrats are in a race to capture the Internet’s voting power, but if campaign donations are anything to go by, Republicans seem to have a slight lead. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, 54 percent of the $4 million that Silicon Valley-based PACs have donated have gone to Republican causes and candidates. Companies that have given more to GOP PACs include Intel, Microsoft and Facebook, while Google and Oracle have given more money to Democrats.

This represents a shift from the norm: Repubs were faster to peel off of SOPA and have been actively wooing tech support.  There’s a strong libertarian streak among VCs and start-up entrepreneurs (too many of whom forget that the creation of the Internet was a publicly financed endeavor) that comports well with certain strains within the GOP.  The Dems are still better on Net Neutrality and privacy, but SOPA was a much bigger deal both to most web entrepreneurs and rank-and-file netizens — and the Dems stood by SOPA for far too long, likely largely because they were worried about losing Hollywood’s support.  The Repubs didn’t have that counterweight to consider, and were more able to make a more swift play for tech votes and bucks.

The Dems need to catch up, and fast.

ACLU: Same Sex Couples Say ‘I Don’t’ to Civil Union Law


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Only 68 Rhode Islanders have applied for civil union licenses since the state passed a law allowing same sex couples to obtain these relationship licenses in lieu of full marriage equality in 2011, according to numbers the RI ACLU said it got from the Department of Health.

When a similar law was passed in Hawaii, 106 same sex couples applied for civil union licenses, and in Deleware 85 applied in the first month, according to the ACLU.

From the ACLU press release:

There are a number of explanations for why Rhode Island’s statute has been shunned so thoroughly by couples. A major reason was the adoption of an extremely broad “religious” exemption in the law, known as the “Corvese Amendment,” that significantly undercuts the law’s purpose. The amendment essentially allows any religiously affiliated institutions or employees of those institutions to disregard the validity of a couple’s civil union. In addition, four of the five other New England states authorize same-sex marriage, highlighting the second-class status of civil unions for Rhode Islanders.

House Speaker Gordon Fox said he intends to get a marriage equality bill passed through the House during the next session but it’s still unclear if a same sex marriage bill would pass in the Senate.

DePetro Courted CoWorker While Defending Christmas


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

The first time WPRO’s John DePetro propositioned a co-worker who filed a sexual harassment suit against him was in a bus on the way to a rally to defend Christmas at the State House, according to an amended complaint filed today in Superior Court.

According to the complaint, the bus – like the Barrington vacation house that DePetro is said to have made unwanted sexual advances towards co-worker Dee DeQuattro – is owned by former state rep. David Caprio. Caprio could not be immediately reached for comment and did not return calls last week either.

According to the court filing:

In December of 2011, Mr. DePetro used a bus that he said was owned by his friend David Caprio, who was present on the bus, to transport listeners to a “Holiday Tree” religious protest at the Rhode Island State House. Mr. DePetro informed Plaintiff that he and his friend had “a lot of fun” on the bus, and that she and some of her girlfriends should join them on the bus some time. Plaintiff did not report the matter as she thought that her rebuff was sufficient.

DePetro had organized a rally at the State House to compel Gov. Chafee to stop using the term Holiday tree. He made national news on FOX for his assertion that calling it a holiday tree was an affront to those who believed in Christmas.

The amended complaint also contains new information about the alleged incident that took place at the house at 32 Lorraine St. in Barrington.

While discussing the house, DePetro casually stated that he and some friends have sexual parties at the house, as he had alluded to on prior occasions, and proceeded to put his hand on Plaintiff’s shoulder and pull her toward him. Plaintiff yelled at him to stop and pushed him back, whereupon DePetro attempted to pull her toward him again and was once more pushed back by Plaintiff, who became extremely upset and told him she just wanted to be brought back to work.

The complaint also says there was a witness at the house, identified as “John” with whom DePetro talked when he and DeQuattro were leaving the house.

The new complaint also adds a charge of defamation and slander because of statements he made to me that were published on this website.

According to the article, Mr. DePetro further falsely claimed that ‘There was never a mention of anything until she f—d up The Who story,'” according to the court filing. ”

“Plaintiff never went into a “tailspin” over her successful “Who” article, which was in fact approved by WPRO, and was certainly never in danger of being fired over it. Plaintiff furthermore had reported her problems with DePetro well before DePetro’s outlandish reaction to the “Who” article, as Defendants were aware.

According to company policy, Cumulus claims that it “strongly prohibits retaliation against any employee or applicant for reporting harassment.” Despite this policy, and despite DePetro’s acknowledgement and intentional disregard of this policy as stated in the RIFuture interview, and despite the fact that DePetro had engaged in obvious retaliatory slander of a co-worker which adversely affected her work environment, he was suspended for only two days.

The amended complaint also now names Lew Dickey, CEO of Cumulus, the parent company of WPRO, as a defendant.

Diane Ravitch Recognizes Regunberg Ed. Policy Piece


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Former U.S. Assistant Secretary of Education Diane Ravitch who famously flip-flopped on the so-called school reform movement, gives a shout out – or at least a link back – to RI Future’s Aaron Regunberg post on how high finance props up public charter schools.

Once an advocate for the charter school movement, Ravitch now calls attention to the inherent problems with allowing big business to fund public education on her blog DainaRavitch.org – it’s necessary reading for anyone who cares about education policy.

This morning she writes:

You may have been naive enough to think that charter schools are multiplying because some people want better education for American children.

You may have thought they were expanding to give more choices to children trapped in bad public schools.

You may have wondered why they continue to proliferate when so many studies agree that they don’t get better results than the public schools.

But if you thought those things, you were on the wrong track.

There are other reasons that charters are growing by leaps and bounds.

They make money for investors!

They are a great investment opportunity!

That send link takes readers to Regunberg’s recent post on “the real agenda behind the big-box charter movement.” He surmises that the agenda is to make money. When you read or watch the interview with David Brain, it will be hard to conclude that there isn’t a huge push from the finance industry to make the charter school movement successful for its own sake.

There’s s till a great debate going on in our comments section on this one, so please feel free to let us know what you think about charter schools and the education reform/deform debate.

Progress Report: McCaffrey vs. Pisaturo; Good Times, Bad Times; Recycling Rising; Happy Birthday HP Lovecraft


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Downtown Providence from the Providence River. (Photo by Bob Plain)

The WPRI General Assembly debates have been fantastic, and Sunday’s between Sen. Michael McCaffrey and challenger Laura Pisaturo was no exception. The two candidates offer a stark choice for Warwick, especially on marriage equality. McCaffrey is against gay marriage and Pisaturo is in a committed gay relationship and is a vehement supporter of marriage equality.

Also, look at these two statements by the candidates to see how they are froaming their campaigns differently.

McCaffrey – “I have children … I want them to grow up in the city of Warwick the way I grew up in the city of Warwick, enjoying the city of Warwick.”

Pisaturo: “If there ever was a time for change in Rhode Island especially in District 29 it’s now.”

They do agree on some issues, though … both said they support raising income tax rates on those who earn more than $250,000 a year.

Another interesting Democratic primary race to watch: Rep. Karen MacBeth vs. Gus Uht. MacBeth is best known for her opposition to abortion and Uht’s campaign is being managed by a lobbyist for the RI NOW.

Are things really that bad in Rhode Island? Well, let’s look at two stories on the front page of the Providence Journal this morning for a little insight. In one article, the Projo reports that “a record number of families slept in homeless shelters and emergency apartments in May and June.” Meanwhile, in another front page article, the Projo says the affluent community of Barrington is looking to hire a leisure director, “responsible for breathing new cultural life into this bedroom community.” The reality is things are really bad for some Rhode Islanders, but many others are doing just fine.

Recycling is “on the rise” in Rhode Island!

Totally cool that Waterfire payed homage to Pussy Riot on Saturday by playing the Russian punk band’s new song “Putin Lights Up The Fires.”

Today in 1866, the National Labor Union asks Congress to implement an eight-hour work day.

And today in 1890, horror author H.P. Lovecraft was born in Providence, RI. He once said, “The world is indeed comic, but the joke is on mankind.”

Most ridiculous thing said this weekend: Rep. Todd Akin of Missouri said female victims of “legitimate rape” don’t become pregnant because woman can shut down the biological process of becoming pregnant.

Nobel Prize winning economist Paul Krugman on Paul Ryan’s economic plan for America: “Ryanomics is and always has been a con game, although to be fair, it has become even more of a con since Mr. Ryan joined the ticket.”

RISC-y Reporting


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Recently, I reported in Progressive Charlestown about major leadership changes in the Rhode Island Statewide Coalition (RISC) and their plan to move out of their long-time headquarters in Charlestown to new quarters in the metro area (they’ve moved to West Warwick).

RISC is Rhode Island’s most prominent right-wing political organization. They’re always getting mentioned in the news when they criticize unions, public workers, Democrats, spending, taxes, etc.

They were originally founded to fight against the Narragansett Indian Tribe and to promote voting rights for out of state shoreline property owners. Over the years, they diversified their issue portfolio to its present, generalized attack on Rhode Island working people. They now list among their coalition partners the Tea Party, Operation Clean Government and a motley collection of local anti-tax groups.

RISC is also a big promoter of open, honest and transparency in government – although as you read on, you’ll see that these principles only apply to other, but not to themselves.

RISC was all over last year’s pension deliberations in the General Assembly building the case that it’s better to rob the pensions of teachers, firefighters, police and public workers than to raise taxes on the rich. This year, they were all over the Governor’s tax proposals and the budget to make sure they didn’t raise taxes on the rich. They seem to have a gavel-to-gavel lobbying presence at the Capitol.

And during election seasons, they spend a lot of energy promoting their slate of conservative candidates. In the 2010 election cycle, they had a slate of 22 candidates for Rhode Island General Assembly seats.

 It’s MAGIC!

 And they manage to do all this by scarcely ever spending any money on political action. At least that’s what it says on their state and federal reports.

A close look at RISC shows that they have a non-profit, tax-exempt foundation, the RISC Foundation, that can accept foundation grants and large, tax-deductible donations from out-of-state moguls who happen to own property in and around Watch Hill and Shelter Harbor[1]. Under the tax code, the RISC Foundation is strictly limited to doing charitable and educational work. But a close examination of their tax returns shows this tax-exempt “foundation” does a whole lot more than charity and education, at least as it’s commonly understood.

RISC itself is a separately incorporated a non-profit organization although the boards of RISC and RISC-F overlap substantially. They also share the same quarters and staff and RISC-F pays for much of the two organizations’ expenses.

Under 501(c)(4) of the tax code, RISC can and does engage in political action, but the consequence of that choice is that its donors cannot deduct their donations. Read on to see how RISC works around that problem.

Then there’s the RISC Political Action Committee (PAC) which is where the rubber hits the political road. RISC PAC is supposed to be the arm of RISC where things like candidate endorsements, campaign contributions and direct political lobbying takes place.

This is where RISC has made its mark as the #1 right-wing Republican political powerhouse in Rhode Island.

However, according to campaign finance reports and the state’s database on lobbyists, they do it by spending almost nothing to support its candidates or lobby the General Assembly on its issues.

Pretty amazing.

Of course, RISC has the right to engage in lobbying, political action and electoral campaigning, so long as it abides by the rules. There are very specific rules under state law and the federal tax code that govern what kind of political action the charitable, educational 501(c)(3) RISC Foundation can do (almost none), what RISC can do under its 501(4) status (quite a bit) and what the RISC-PAC can do (almost anything).

There are reporting requirements that must be followed by all three entities.

RISC is big on demands for open and transparent government. It is also big on fairness for rich people who are, apparently, an oppressed minority subject to brutal discrimination.

For years, they echoed the claims of another one of their offspring, the late Ocean State Policy Research Institute (OSPRI), that Rhode Island was driving rich people away through its tax policy, when in fact, the opposite is true. Then, OSPRI died, having been caught fudging its data once too often.

First, let’s take a look at how well RISC practices what it preaches on openness and transparency.

RISC and the RISC Foundation file annual 990 reports with the Internal Revenue Service[2] that cover where their money comes from and how they spend it.

According to their IRS-990 reports, the two organizations take in an average of just under $300,000 a year according to the last three reports on file at Guidestar.org.

The really big bucks go to the RISC Foundation. In their last three IRS-990 reports on file, RISC-F raised $506,648. Of that $440,186 came from out of state – that’s 87%. The largest sums come from Florida.

By comparison, RISC raised $377,630 during that same period.

The donations to The RISC Foundation are tax-deductible while donations to RISC are not. Much of this tax-deductible money comes from RISC and RISC-F board members[3].

RISC’s income is harder to trace. Much of it comes from unsourced “donations” and “membership.” Some of it comes from money transfers from the RISC Foundation.

Since there is a significant time lag in the filing of IRS-990 reports (e.g., the most recent RISC reports cover the fiscal year that ended September 30, 2009), I project that RISC has raised around one and a quarter million dollars since 2007. Most of it was in the form of tax-deductible donations, and most of the tax-deductible donations came from out of state.

I believe my projections of RISC’s income are conservative. The 2010 election cycle was big for RISC, and the IRS 990 reports for that year are not yet available online. In 2011, RISC’s campaign to cut public worker pensions gave it some of the most notoriety it has ever had, the kind of fame that often translates into money.

 RISC-PAC

 RISC’s Political Action Committee was set up by RISC founder Harry Staley on December 16, 2005. According to its filings with the RI Board of Elections (BOE), it took no part in the 2006 elections. It raised nothing and spent nothing. Then Staley dissolved the group in December 2006.

He reactivated RISC-PAC in November 2008, but too late to take part in that election cycle.

According to its filings with the RI Board of Elections, RISC-PAC raised $4,200 in the 2010 election cycle and gave out exactly that amount just before Election Day, in the form of $200 checks, to 22 candidates for the state Senate and House.

So far, according to their filings with the Board of Elections (which are current),RISC-PAC has raised nothing and spent nothing for the 2012 election cycle. They have not filed a declaration with the BOE stating which candidates or ballot questions they plan to support or oppose.

It’s certainly mystifying how RISC can be such a political player and report so little of its resources being used to advance its political objectives.

As for their lobbying in the General Assembly, there too, RISC is required by law to report on their expenditures. Regular reports, plus an annual cumulative reporting on lobbying activities, must be filed with the Secretary of State.

RISC also had to report its lobbying costs to IRS on its annual 990 reports. Interestingly, in 2008, RISC reported $6,190 in lobbying expenses to IRS and another $3,451 in 2009 but zero to the RI Secretary of State.

However, in both those years, RISC told the RI Secretary of State that it had no lobbying expenses.

Online copies of the state records are available by clicking here. The database is clunky, but the records going back to 2005 are there. According to this database, the RI Statewide Coalition spent zero on lobbying from 2005 to 2012, except for one year – 2006 – when it reported spending just under $5,000[4].

In the next installment, I will go into where RISC and the RISC Foundation say the money goes.

FOOTNOTES

[1] It’s not a coincidence that half of the founders of the Shelter Harbor Golf Club were also founders and board members of RISC and the RISC Foundation. Accord to its website, Shelter Harbor Golf Club’s Founders were Mr. H. James A. Atwood; Mr. Finn M.W. Caspersen; Mr. Frederick Maynard, III; Mr. Robert C. McCormack; Mr. Stephen M. Peet; Mr. Charles M. Royce and Mr. Frederick B. Whittemore.

[2] To get a look at these IRS-990 reports for yourself, go to Guidestar.org and register (for free). Then, you can use their database to look up the last five filings for just about every nonprofit organization in the United States. Guidestar is by far the most popular way to get detailed information on nonprofits.

[3] These include RISC’s founder Harry Staley himself, who gave a tax-deductible donation of $15,600 to the Foundation. Other board donors include the late Finn Caspersen ($25,000); Frederick Whittemore ($10,000); John P. Duffy ($20,086); James Birle ($20,000) and Robert McCormack ($5,000)

[4] That was the year RISC, then called the Shoreline Coalition, spearheaded the Voter Initiative Alliance. Because of their extensive lobbying on this issue, the RI Board of Election ruled that RISC needed to register as a Political Action Committee. For at least that one year, they reported lobbying expenses to the Secretary of State, but not since despite its extensive lobbying activities and electioneering.

 

Bad Time to Announce A Free-To-Play Copernicus


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
38_Studios_Logo
38 Studios’ logo, (via Wikipedia)

Thanks to WPRI.com reporter Ted Nesi’s Twitter pontifications, we’ve learned from Boston Magazine‘s Jason Schwartz that 38 Studios had planned to release their flagship game (codenamed “Project Copernicus“) under the “freemium” model of gaming (a portmanteau of “free” and “premium”, referring to the dual use of free and premium accounts, dominant in tech-savvy South Korea). It’s a bit like the razor blade model of business; send out the initial product for free, hook the customer, and then charges for supplemental services. Essentially, in a freemium game, players can play essentially everything with a free account; you can download the game online and then play with no additional costs. However, players can buy perks or unlock additional content for actual money, giving them a leg up on other players. Massively Multiplayer Online Roleplaying Games (MMPORGs) lend themselves particularly to this kind of business model.

This was actually a smart business move for 38 Studios. OnlyWorld of Warcraft can maintain a subscription model, mainly because they operate as the Facebook of online games; people play because their friends are there. They also benefit from the sunk cost fallacy; since players have already blown hundreds or thousands of dollars on World of Warcraft, it would be insane to stop paying and thus stop playing now. It’s a logical fallacy, but plenty of businesses profit off of it. That 38 Studios had managed to convince Curt Schilling to come around to the free-to-play model shows a willingness to adapt to changing circumstances.

Unfortunately, learning now that it would’ve been an announcement that “shocked the world” (according to Mr. Schilling’s remarks to Mr. Schwartz) is too little too late, and adds fodder to the narrative that 38 Studios was not a well-run company (one which is indelibly created from Mr. Schwartz’s previous story on 38 Studios). I was bashing 38 Studios for relying on the subscription model back in mid-February in some of my earliest writing for RI Future. It was a bad model in 2010, when the deal that moved 38 Studios to Rhode Island was started. Had 38 Studios announced that they were intending a freemium-type game much earlier (say, at any time before the company missed payroll), it could’ve given them serious boost. Plenty of projects continue on the basis of fan goodwill (plus, fanboys = identified market, which investors like to hear about).

An example of that is the venerable MechWarrior/BattleTech series of games. Beginning in 1984 as a board game, MechWarrior was the video game series, which had a great hit with 1995’s MechWarrior 2 (a personal favorite of mine), but ultimately the developer shut down in 2007 after subsequent games failed. Its founder is working with a new developer to create MechWarrior Online. It’s a free-to-play game already in its Open Beta stage of development (anyone can pay to help test the game while it’s be developed ahead of its planned release).

All of this is to miss another point I’ve made before: nothing was pointing to any great innovation on the part of Project Copernicus. In fact, that this would be the first triple-A release that was free-to-play would’ve been the first signal that 38 Studios was actually bringing something unique to a market crowded with same-samey games. But what we were getting about Copernicus is that it was essentially like Kingdoms of Amalur, a relatively old-hat type of game. In fact, World of Warcraft wasn’t particularly unique. It simply followed Apple’s model of development; rely on your dedicated fan base from other products to purchase your item and generate good buzz, let the innovators go out and do their thing, then do what they did, but better.

A poster for World of Tanks (via Wikipedia)

To compete in the online gaming arena, you need something new. The Belarusian company Wargaming.net has provided that with World of Tanks and done exceedingly well. Having played the game, it’s a incredibly fun initial experience, though there’s a bit of frustration as more skilled people turn your fun tank into Swiss cheese (I’m understating, more than once I’ve had to quit the game to let my anger over how much I suck at it subside). Wargaming.net is spinning the game off into World of Warships and World of Warplanes.

Alternatively, if new doesn’t float your boat, open is a good idea as well. Paradox Interactive is an example of a gaming company which doesn’t keep its cool stuff under its hat (they’ve recently announced they’re starting on the fourth version of Europe Universalis, their flagship game which launched the “grand strategy” genre of computer games). They’re always giving more information to fans about their games, via developer diaries with insight into the process and features, and also by fostering a lively forum community.

38 Studios seemed to neglect this strategy. What did we know about Copernicus? Not much. Perhaps Kingdoms of Amalur was to be its predecessor and tie into the world. In the end, we didn’t even know its actual name.

So yes, free-to-play was an intelligent decision for 38 Studios. It’s a shame that we’re learning it now. But Governor Lincoln Chafee didn’t mess the company up, the people tasked with running it did. Had free-to-play been announced as 38 Studios was facing bankruptcy it would’ve looked desperate. It needed to be sold that way from the start. Of course, hindsight is 20/20, but then I was saying this stuff two years ago (just not publicly on the Internet). And I still standby what the majority of Rhode Islanders believed at the time, that this deal should not have been made.

Note: I’ve used “free-to-play” and “freemium” interchangeably here. Technically, that’s not exactly correct, one relies on ads and/or micro-transactions to generate profit, the other relies on paid accounts and occasionally ads and micro-transactions to turn a profit. However, they’re near enough as to make no difference here, and many of the games I mentioned use them interchangeably as well when describing their own games.

I’m not Bruce Bayuk, and Other Tidbits from the Trail


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

When I started this column, Bob suggested that I stick to “Progressive political issues.” This column is one exception. It’s going to be a collection of political shenanigans, conversations with constituents,  notes and anecdotes from the trail so far.

The Article that Was/Wasn’t…

I’ve been noticing a lot of divergence between the Providence Journal’s paper paper and it’s online editions… Huge hunks of articles, and even entire pieces are missing online.

Maybe you saw the big piece that Ed Fitzpatrick wrote last week? Chances are, you didn’t, or if you did, you were scratching your head. I spent an hour or so talking with Ed in my favorite part of the district, down by the Seekonk River. We watched herons and cranes and gulls, and discussed the 38 Studios debacle as well as the important issues that I’m focusing on. Ed followed up with some phone questions.

Then, last Thursday, I woke up at 5:30, excited to see the article about the campaign in the Providence Journal. I’d had long conversations with the reporter, and was hopeful about the piece.

The headline? Bruce Bayuk hopes to buck history, beat FoxIn blog terms, WTF?

What might have been a breakthrough article about the campaign became a head scratcher. A fair and balanced article with a headline that might have been written, Mark Binder hopes to buck history, beat Fox, was instantly irrelevant and inconsequential.

The cynic in me might think that the headline was rewritten on purpose. I wrote Ed and he called the headline the “ridiculous” mistake of a copy editor. A correction was posted in the paper the next day, but the article remains uncorrected in the online archive, and invisible from the newspaper’s website.

We sent an email today to the newspaper requesting they fix it online, but nothing has changed yet. I finally wrote a letter to the editor, which appeared online a few days ago, and finally appeared in the paper: Bad Headline Indeed, (Providence Journal, August 16.) Only one mistake… it says I’m running in the primary as a Democrat… I’m not. I’m running in the General Election as an independent. Sigh.

Q: If the online archive is incorrect, and a correction is issued, should the online edition be changed in retrospect?

Her Health Insurance is Killing Her

She was shaking her head as the kid a few doors up chased a ball into the street. Aside from the general economic climate, her biggest concern was health insurance. She worked, but her boss didn’t provide health insurance. Instead, she had to pay $640 a month. As a candidate, and not a reporter, I didn’t ask what her job was, or what she was getting paid. If she was making $10 an hour, though, that would be roughly 40% of her income before taxes.

The problem, she said, was that the only insurance available in Rhode Island is Blue Cross. “Even if you go to the United Way, they tell you that you have to see Blue Cross.”

Taxes and Roads

“What issues are important to you?” I asked the fellow answering the door.

“Taxes and roads,” he said. “The excise tax on cars is too high and the roads stink. Lower the taxes and fix the roads.”

How do you fix roads, I wanted to say, without taxing the cars that use them?

But he didn’t really want to talk just then. He was in the middle of watching a ball game.

Not Now!

It was about 7:30 on a Thursday night. I knocked on the door, and was about to walk off, when the door opened.

“What is it?” the woman said. “What?”

“I’m Mark Binder, I’m running for…”

“Not now! Not during dinner,” she said, turning away and shutting the door.

Note to self about campaigning in the evening: they’re either at work, just back from work, relaxing after work, about to sit down to dinner, eating dinner, just finished dinner, watching a ball game, or getting ready for bed. Aim for the windows in between those.

 Student Loan Rip Offs

One man owns a garage, works 60 hours a week, and his wife works as well. They’ve put two children through college and are enrolling their third. They’re mostly paying for their child’s education, but wanted to give their son some responsibility, so they applied for a loan. (I believe he said it was Fannie Mae, but I could be wrong.)

They were told that a $5,000 student loan would be payable at an interest rate of more than 9%.

Previous student loans for other children were in the 5% range.

Given that the current prime lending rate is so low, and that student loans are guaranteed by the Federal Government, and that they can’t be waived away in bankruptcy, they asked why it was so high. Was there something wrong with their credit rating?

“No,” the loan officer said. “Your credit rating is good, and the loan is for a small amount. That’s why the rate is so high.”

Time off for good behavior

“What are you going to do about criminals getting time off for good behavior?” the woman asked.

I hesitated. I’m learning how to be a politician. “Why do you ask?”

“My brother was killed by a man who had gotten fifteen years in prison for a violent crime, but got out in three. If there wasn’t any time off for good behavior, my brother would still be alive.”

What do you say to this? I was speechless.

On the one hand, I believe in people being able to redeem themselves. On the other, this woman’s brother was murdered.

“I don’t know,” I said. “If I think of something, I’ll let you know.”

Jill Stein, Green Party Candidate for President, Comes to RI


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

In the most exciting news, our very dynamic Green presidential candidate, Jill Stein, will be in Rhode Island today and wants to meet you personally, to talk about the “Green New Deal,” and hear your views on solutions for America. You may have heard Jill’s incredible interview on National Public Radio, or seen reports of her recent arrest at a housing foreclosure protest in Philadelphia. Wouldn’t you like to meet her personally? On Saturday, August 18, you can!

Of course, Green politics aren’t only about elections. Unprecedented heat waves, rising awareness of global warming, other ecological catastrophes, economic crisis, democratic breakdowns, and incessant war, prove that we need an active, effective Green Party more than ever. Here in Rhode Island, we are:
• Organizing an exciting, inspirational “Rally for Jobs, Peace, and Planet” on Saturday, August 18.
• Collecting thousands of signatures, to place Green presidential candidate Jill Stein on the ballot.
• Hosting “Make a Splash with Jill Stein” at North Scarborough State Beach on Sunday, August 19.

We hope you’re as inspired as we are, by these exciting new developments. Do you want to be part of this movement for genuine, progressive change? If so, here are three simple things you can do:
• We invite you to a Green statewide gathering, at 11:00 a.m. on Saturday, August 18, to meet Jill Stein in person, hear from local candidates, approve Green Party endorsements, and plan for the future. We’re gathering in Providence at the Unitarian parish house at One Benevolent Street, near the corner of Benefit Street. Won’t you join us? Contact VoteGreen2012@rigreens.org to RSVP, and for more information.
• Later the same day, our Rally for Jobs, Peace, and Planet will introduce Jill Stein to Rhode Island voters, and we invite you to join us! Come show your support for the Green New Deal, and hear speakers from other progressive groups including Occupy Providence and the Rhode Island Black PAC. We’ll rally in downtown Providence at 3:00 p.m., at the Roger Williams National Memorial, 282 North Main Street. For more info, visit http://www.greens.org/ri/jpp_rally.html or on Facebook, visit the rally invitation page.
• Finally, visit our website at www.rigreens.org, to volunteer or to make a secure donation. At this site you can learn all about the Green Party, our platform, and Green parties around the world.

With your help, and many other Rhode Islanders, this year can be a Green milestone for the Ocean State!
If we don’t do it, and do it now—who will, and when?

Good Start: DLT Recalls 7 Call Center Employees


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

In a recent statement from the Rhode Island Department of Labor & Training, seven of the fifty-one employees laid off last July are being recalled. DLT Director Fogarty praised both the Governor and the United States Department of Labor for their concern for customer service. Since the recent staff reduction, contact with the DLT’s Unemployment Insurance sector has gone from difficult to nearly impossible. While it is valid for DLT administration to celebrate the return of the seven staff members to help bail out the drowning department, it may be more appropriate to call this recall what it truly is: a good start.

Negotiations between the state and federal departments have resulted in the U.S. Department of Labor agreeing to allow allocation of approximately $500,000 for human resources from the UI Modernization Fund. This pool of money was initially intended for technological and automated system upgrades. However, given the drastic nature of the staff cuts – about two-thirds of the call center representatives’ jobs eliminated – the sheer volume of calls was too much to handle. Rhode Island is still holding strong with the second highest levels of unemployment in the country. The workload did not diminish and the technology did not improve on the scale to allow for the decimated staff to keep up.

SEIU Local 401 President Lynn Tipton commented on the recall stating, “Long waits and delayed processing of services have continued for Rhode Island’s unemployed.  The recall of 7 Senior Employment &Training Interviewers at DLT is a start in helping relieve some of the repercussions as a result of the original layoff of 57 workers in July. RIESA Local 401 SEIU continues to urge administration in locating more funds and continue the recall until they have an adequate workforce to serve its customers.”

As a laid off DLT employee I, myself, can attest to the customer service nightmare caused by the sudden elimination of fifty-one call center representatives out of a total of just over eighty. Unemployment Insurance Senior Employment & Training Interviewers – the actual job classification title of those laid off – consists of far more than answering the phones and processing internet claims for Unemployment Insurance. The details of the back office functions are intricate and fairly uninteresting to the layperson. Suffice it to say, taking a claimant from initial contact through to full understanding and timely and consistent payment of benefits requires time, care and follow-up. Answering the phones is merely the first of many steps toward giving quality customer service.

Is this infusion of seven trained and ready staff members a needed boost to the DLT’s UI sector in crisis? Yes. Does it merit appreciation of those who negotiated for the funds to be allocated where they are best spent right now: human resources? Absolutely. Is this a small victory for union labor/management relations at a time when they feel strained? Definitely. The union made a case that proved valid and it is the top seven in union seniority that are being called back.

On a related note, a non-union position was posted for an administrator of workforce development programs at a salary approximately twice that of a single one of the recalled employees. Dare I ask from where came the funding for that job?

Will these seven returning employees be able to ride in and save the customer service battle being valiantly fought in vain by the small troupe of remaining reps? Probably not. Even the Greeks at Thermopylae had three hundred Spartans. The DLT has far fewer, even with the seven returning. There are still over 60,000 unemployed Rhode Islanders seeking help in the areas of labor and training.

But seven is a good start and will hopefully lead to more being recalled in the future. In the spirit of full disclosure, I am not one of the seven being recalled at this time. But as one who is currently collecting Unemployment Insurance benefits while seeking full-time employment I can say that anything that will enhance my customer service experience when having to make contact with the department gets my full support.

On behalf of Rhode Island’s Unemployed citizens I would like to thank Director Fogarty, Governor Chafee and the others who helped in securing the funding to make our DLT experience a little easier. And we implore you to continue in this direction of fighting for funding to help those most in need.

 

Progress Report: Chafee Dances with Democrats; ‘Stalled’ Economy; Jesse Jackson Jr; Happy Birthday, OWS


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Downtown Providence from the Providence River. (Photo by Bob Plain)

Gov. Lincoln Chafee, a longtime Republican who left the GOP during the neo-con days of the George W. Bush era, hasn’t become a Democrat yet, but he is going to the Democratic National Convention this year in Charlotte.

Imagine the three-way Democratic primary for governor if Chafee did join with Democrats and runs again in 2014? But having nothing to do with the gubernatorial race in 2014, we hope Chafee doesn’t join with Democrats for two reasons. One is that, all things considered, his politics are pretty centrist; he’s socially very liberal but fiscally he’s moderate-to-conservative. While this is pretty much the definition of a Rhode Island Democrat, we’d like to see the D’s move to the left and Chafee would move the party right. The other is that Chafee’s one true political gift is his independence. Say what you will about his social skills, but he’s unafraid to do what he thinks is right regardless of which political allies or enemies he burns or helps.

Our economy in a nutshell: “Indicators show R.I. stalled, no relief soon.”

Speaking of the shit hitting the fan, was this song prophetically written for Rhode Island’s ailing economy or what?

Thanks to Marc Comtois for weighing in on whether we should be more concerned with a public sector thieves than a public airwaves creeps. Good points!

Good luck to Jesse Jackson Jr. as he works his way out of his post mania depression. It’s a long, lonely road but it seems like, thanks in part to Patrick Kennedy, yours will be paved with the most important thing in life: good friends.

Here’s what Ronny Reagan’s budget director thinks of Paul Ryan’s budget plan.

Meanwhile, our dependence on Saudi Arabian oil is growing again.

The Occupy Wall Street movement will celebrate its one-year anniversary on September 17, one month from today.

 

DePetro Barrington House Owned by David Caprio


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
32 Lorraine St. in Barrington is an 9,000-square-foot vacation rental owned by former state Rep. David Caprio.

The Barrington house where radio shock jock John DePetro allegedly sexually harassed WPRO coworker Dee DeQuattro is owned by former state Rep. David Caprio.

Sources who spoke on the condition of anonymity confirmed the address of the house in question as being 32 Lorraine St., a very high end vacation rental known as Beach House, a 9,000-square-foot, 1895 Victorian-style mansion that rents for $8,800 in the summertime, according to a vacation rental website.

Barrington property records indicate the property is owned by John LaRochelle and David Caprio, both Providence attorneys. It is appraised at $1,545,800 and has 24 rooms, 14 bedrooms and 5 full bathrooms.

Caprio, a Democrat, was a state legislator representing Narragansett from 1999 until 2010 when he lost in a primary to Rep. Teresa Tanzi. His brother Frank ran for governor against Linc Chafee and famously told President Obama to “shove it.” Their father Frank is a well-known local TV judge on the show “Caught in Providence.”

A phone number of the vacation rental website rings Caprio’s phone, who could not be immediately reached for comment. According to a press release dated January 21, 2011 from his web designer, Caprio has recently stepped up efforts to rent the property.

“Former State Representative David Caprio recently stepped up efforts to attract visitors to his 9,000 square foot vacation home in Barrington, Rhode Island,” reads the press release. “Although the Victorian estate, affectionately known as the Beach Mansion, has been available for booking in the past, Caprio received fewer reservations than he would have liked.”

According to DeQuattro’s lawsuit, her and DePetro were to get lunch together on the afternoon of May 21.

“DePetro instead stated he had another place in mind and drove to a house on a dead end street in Barrington,” according to the filing. “Plaintiff inquired where they were and DePetro said he owned the property and insisted plaintiff exit the car and come into the house while he retrieved an item. While inside the house DePetro made sexual advances towards the Plaintiff.”

DeQuattro declined to comment on the lawsuit or the house in question.

OMG Breaking News – – – – – – – – NEXT WEEK!

In what can best be described as yet another bizarre Anthony Gemma stunt to garner attention to his largely fake and irrelevant campaign, Gemma posted this on Facebook this morning:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Apparently, breaking news that will have an immediate impact really means next week, according to a BREAKING GoLocalProv report with the stunning news that Gemma scheduled a press conference next week.

At least we can all take comfort knowing that Anthony Gemma will be there for us through his cries for attention.

 

Corporate Agenda Behind Public Charter Schools


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
This investor dude is making big dollars for himself and his rich clients by taking money out of your public school system. But no, the charter movement is totally progressive.

Here’s the setup. CNBC is interviewing David Brain, head of a major investment trust, about why charter schools are such phenomenal money-makers for investors like him. Here’s the transcript.

Anchor: Charter schools have become very popular as parents seek more choice in educating their children. But are charter schools a wise addition to your investment portfolio? Well let’s ask David Brain, President and CEO of Entertainment Properties Trust. David, why would I want to add charter schools into my portfolio?

DB: Well I think it’s a very stable business, very recession-resistant. It’s a high-demand product. There’s 400,000 kids on waiting lists for charter schools, the industry’s growing about 12-14% a year. So it’s a high-growth, very stable, recession-resistant business. It’s a public payer, the state is the payer on this category, and if you do business with states with solid treasuries then it’s a very solid business.

Anchor: Well let me ask you about potential risks, here, to your charter school portfolio, because I understand that three of your nine “Imagine” schools are scheduled to actually lose their charters for the next school year. Does this pose a risk to investors?

DB: Well, occasionally—our Imagine arrangement’s on a master lease, so there’s no loss of rents to the company, although occasionally there are losses of charters in certain areas and they’re used to peculiar, particular circumstances. In this case it’s a combination of relationship with the supervisory authorities and educational quality; sometimes the educational quality is very difficult to change in one, two, or three years. It’s a long-term proposition, so there are some of these that occur, but we’ve structured our affairs so this is not going to impact our rent-roll and in fact you see this is maybe even a good experience as the industry thins out some of the less-performing schools and we move on to the best-performing schools.

Anchor: David there has been somewhat of a backlash to charter schools in some areas given their use of public money, as you noted. Any risk to the growth of charter schools generally?

DB: I don’t—there’s not a lost of risk, there’s probably risk to everything but the fact is this has bipartisan support. It’s part of the Republican platform and Arne Duncan, Secretary of Education in the Obama Administration, has been very high on it throughout their work in public education. So we have both political parties are solidly behind it, you have high demand, high growth, you have performance across the board, most studies have charter schools at even or better than district public education. So, I think it has some risk because it’s new and it’s emerging and it is a high-growth category. But at the same time I think much more’s going forward so it’s still a safe area for investment.

Anchor: You’ve invested in retail centers, ski parks, you’ve got charter schools, you’ve got movie theaters. If you could buy one thing right now, David, one type of asset in real estate, what would it be? 

DB: Well, probably the charter school business. We said it’s our highest growth and most appealing sector right now of the portfolio. It’s the most high in demand, it’s the most recession-resistant. And a great opportunity set with 500 schools starting every year. It’s a two and a half billion dollar opportunity set annually.

Two and a half billion dollar opportunity set annually.

Progress Report: Accusations and Employment; Gemma’s Fake Followers; Gina’s Finance Friend; Paul Ryan


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Conservatives across Rhode Island are upset that a Warwick public works employee didn’t lose his job after being accused of stealing from the city. Accused, mind you, not convicted. Meanwhile, not a peep from the right about what WPRO should do with the state’s biggest blowhard John DePetro, who is accused of something far worse than property theft. He’s accused of sexual harassment, something that can cause serious emotional scars on another human being. But I suppose so long as it doesn’t cost them any money, conservatives just don’t care about who does what.

When we reported on Anthony Gemma’s suspicious social networking prowess way back in March, we just knew things didn’t seem right. WPRO actually put it to a test and found out as much as 79 percent of his Twitter followers might be fake. While having 80 percent of your followers might seem high, it actually might be low; if WPRO’s analysis is correct, he’d still have almost 200,000 real followers and I doubt he does.

GoLocal accuses Gina Raimondo of helping to funnel state work to a venture capitalist who donated to her campaign and helped launch her career in finance.

The Providence Journal editorial board seems to be the only ones in the nation who doubt Paul Ryan’s conservative credentials. They say not until Obama became president did “the deficit and Big Government suddenly became all-important to Mr. Ryan.”

Here’s more on his Medicare proposal.

And we meant to mention this one the other day … the Rhode Island Center for Freedom for the Prosperous got a half true from Politifact for its assertion that RI has the highest number of health insurance mandates in the country. It’s actually not true, but the Projo gave them half credit because they did read it somewhere.

On this day in history both Elvis Presley and Babe Ruth died. Conversely, Charles Bukowski and Madonna were born. By the way, Babe Ruth died when he was one year younger than Madonna is now. Elvis was only 42 when he left the building once and for all.

 

WPRO’s John DePetro: ‘I Have Been Suspended’


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

John DePetro said he was suspended until Monday for talking to me about the sexual harassment lawsuit brought against him, he said in an email to me today.

Here is the email he sent me in its entirety:

I have been suspended for my part in the story that appeared about me this morning.  I have already denied the allegations against me, and I should not have discussed the matter beyond that.  To make things worse, the quotes that were attributed to me were not entirely accurate.  I hope it is clear that I do not speak on behalf of Cumulus with regards to the investigation or any other Company employment matters.   I have learned from my mistake and look forward to returning to the air on Monday.  Going forward, I shall have no further comments about this matter.

On Tuesday, DePetro called me after reading a post I wrote imploring WPRO to replace him with a more suitable talk show host. Without asking for the conversation to be off the record, he told me what he thought about the allegations brought against him.

I also got an email from new WPRO Program Director Craig Schwalb, 15 minutes prior to getting the email from DePetro. He did not mention DePetro being suspended and could not be immediately reached for comment. Here’s that email in its entirety too:

Our usual policy is not to discuss pending litigation or confidential employment matters with the media. That said, we must correct statements that were attributed to Cumulus earlier today. Cumulus did a prompt and complete investigation of the concerns that Ms. DeQuattro raised with the Company. Cumulus encourages employees to report these type of concerns and we are glad she did so. By its nature, this sort of investigation focuses on whether specific allegations can be confirmed or refuted. In terms of the results of this particular investigation and the actions taken by the Company, we will continue to respect the confidentiality that should be provided to internal employment matters.

The lawsuit has nothing to do with WPROs day-to-day operations and will be resolved through the court system. Dee DeQuattro continues to be a valuable part of the WPRO team and we all continue to work together to provide WPRO listeners with the very best news and commentary.


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387