RI Moves Closer to Equality; So Does Obama


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Gov. Chafee, Treasurer Gina Raimondo and Reps. Frank Ferri and Art Handy testify for marriage equality rights last week. (Photo by Jenny Norris)

The House Judiciary Committee moved Rhode Island closer than it has ever been to recognizing the rights of same sex couples tonight and it will likely be a fun debate on the House floor before it passes there too on Thursday.

The state Senate, of course, is a different story as it’s still unclear whether Teresa Paiva Weed will eventually side with Catholicism or equality. While she may seem adamant about being on the wrong side of history now, Democrats have been known to move pretty fast on this issue.

NBC News notes President Obama’s quick shift from being not-too-far from where the Senate President is to someone who now equates marriage equality with civil liberties.

*** Obama’s striking comments (and shift) on gay rights: Maybe the most striking (and memorable) lines of Obama’s inaugural speech were his remarks on gay rights. “‘All of us are created equal’ is the star that guides us still — just as it guided our forebears through Seneca Falls, and Selma, and Stonewall,” he said. He later added, “Our journey is not complete until our gay brothers and sisters are treated like anyone else under the law.” It’s important to remember that Obama was someone who opposed gay marriage in presidential run in ’08, and who later said he was evolving on the subject. Obama’s shift is a reflection of how quickly the politics of gay marriage have changed in this country. (The train was leaving the station, and Obama jumped on board.) And so is the fact that there has been little to no backlash to those remarks — at least so far.

 

Protecting Roe: What Every Rhode Islander Can Do


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

It’s been 40 years since the U.S. Supreme Court confirmed that the constitutionally protected right to privacy includes every woman’s right to make her own personal medical decisions, without the interference of politicians – including the right to end a pregnancy. Leading up to today there has been a lot of talk about the next generation of abortion rights activists and whether or not millennials appreciate the hard fought right to a safe and legal abortion.

Speaking as a “millennial” myself, I can say that young women value the impact of Roe but recognize that the present day conversation rests within issues of sexual identity, health insurance coverage for birth control with no co-pays and the need to push past labels like “pro-choice” and “pro-life.”  It’s clear to me that the next generation of activists is ready and willing to build off the hard work of those who’ve come before us – and expand the conversation to those who have felt left out of the “choice” conversation for too long.

Forty years may have passed but Planned Parenthood’s mission remains the same: to protect the fundamental right of all individuals to manage their own fertility and sexual health and to ensure access to the services, education and information to realize that right. In Rhode Island, we recognize the need to not only protect the right to abortion but also to ensure access to a wide range of reproductive health care – including well woman exams, STI testing and treatment and access to all methods of contraception from the pill to intrauterine devices.

So, although Planned Parenthood advocates for access to a wide range of preventative family planning programs, Rhode Island lags behind our New England neighbors when it comes to unintended pregnancy rates.  Even though we know that for every dollar invested in family planning services, the state saves $3.75, we’re forced to waste time fighting unnecessary, shaming legislation like mandatory-waiting periods and ultrasounds.

Rhode Island is one of 22 states – and the only state in New England – that the Guttmacher Institute designates as “hostile” to women’s reproductive health.   NARAL Pro-Choice America gives Rhode Island a D+ rating on their national score card.  How could this be you might ask?  Rhode Island has dozens of archaic laws on the book some of which include:

  • An unconstitutional and unenforceable criminal ban on abortion;
  • “Informed consent” laws that subject women seeking abortion to biased-counseling requirements;
  • Restrictive insurance coverage of abortion for some (state employees) and unenforceable laws that restrict private insurance coverage for abortion for all;
  • Laws that allow certain individuals, health care providers and entities to refuse to provide specific reproductive health services, referrals or information including information and prescriptions for birth control.

It’s time that the Rhode Island legislature understand that investing in prevention and comprehensive sex education is the only proven way to address unintended pregnancy.  We encourage you to take action and share your stories with friends, family members and elected officials.  To get you started, here are three actions you can take today:

  1. Tell them to support access to preventative family planning programs and NOT to support shaming legislation like mandatory ultrasounds or any politically motivated abortion ban.
  2. Tell Planned Parenthood your story One in five women have visited a Planned Parenthood in their lifetime.  With anti-choice politicians determined to take away women’s access to healthcare, it’s never been more important to share your story and show that Planned Parenthood is a vital organization in your community.
  3. Join the Planned Parenthood Action Network.  Stay informed about current events and legislation on the national and state level.

Paula Hodges is the Public Policy & Advocacy Director for Planned Parenthood Southern New England and Planned Parenthood Votes! Rhode Island.

Rep. Lima Defends Her Religion Over Equal Rights


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Today’s ProJo ran a piece on the expected passage, later today, of H5015, the Marriage Equality bill. The piece ran some quotes from Representative Charlene Lima that surprised me.

“We were sensitive to an atheist in Cranston to take down a prayer banner” she said, referring to a legal challenge that led to the removal of a prayer banner at Cranston High School West. “I don’t see why we can’t be sensitive to the Catholic Church.”

Lima’s public statements on the prayer banner, made at a school committee meeting, demonstrate anything but sensitivity.

She implored the school committee to appeal the ruling, a move that would have put the city and its struggling schools on the hook for anywhere between $250,000 and $1 million. She felt that the judge’s ruling was not justified given the facts of the case. There is no reason to believe that she has changed her opinion.

Her quote in the ProJo shows that her priorities, then, during the prayer banner kerfuffle, and now, during the debate on marriage equality, are squarely in line not with the citizens of the state of Rhode Island, but with the narrow agenda of the Roman Catholic Church.

During the hearings conducted at the house last Tuesday evening, Lima asked Father Bernard Healey about the living arrangements of married couples at Providence College. She was worried that PC would be forced, under the law, to house married gay couples, against the conscience of practicing Catholics. Father Healey had no answer for her regarding this issue. In fact, that evening, Rep. Lima was the only person to bring the issue up. Three philosophy professors from PC testified against the bill, but never brought up that particular issue.

Happy 40th, Roe v. Wade


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

On the 40th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, the Rhode Island Coalition for Reproductive Justice (formerly RI Choice Coalition) continues to stand with women and their families to reinforce the importance of safe and legal abortion.  The coalition is pleased to announce its new name on this important anniversary and to recognize the significance of working toward reproductive justice beyond access to abortion.  Reproductive Justice takes into account the multiple identities of a person and the social context in which they live and how that impacts their access to healthcare.  As a coalition we are committed to ensuring Rhode Islanders are able to make decisions concerning their reproduction free of discrimination, coercion and violence.

Coalition leaders are working actively in the legislature and the community to preserve women’s access to a wide range of health care options and to advocate for affordable, quality healthcare for all.  In addition, a new organization, Rhode Island Clergy for Reproductive Choice has been formed and will work in concert with the Reproductive Justice Coalition to bring faith voices into our advocacy and grassroots work on these important issues.

Despite a woman’s constitutional right to make her own personal medical decisions without interference from politicians, access to safe and legal abortion is still at risk in legislatures across the country including our own. Rhode Island is one of 22 states – and the only state in New England – that the Guttmacher Institute designates as “hostile” to women’s reproductive health.

Recent public opinion research conducted by Planned Parenthood Federation of America concluded that the way in which people identify with the issue of abortion has shifted over the years. Labels like “pro-choice” and “pro-life” no longer reflect the way most people think about the complex decision-making that is required when women consider abortion. Americans recognize that these decisions are deeply personal, and should be left to a woman to decide in consultation with her family, physician and faith.

Partner Statements

Peter Stein, Chair of the RI Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice:

Rhode Island’s proud heritage is grounded in broad religious freedom and tolerance.  We are home to the first synagogue in the country, the first Baptist church in America, and many other grand and significant houses of worship.  We are blessed with a vibrant and important religious life in our state.  We must always defend the freedom of religion and celebrate the diversity of viewpoints in our state.  Quite simply, when access to abortion, birth control and other medical services is limited, it prevents women from taking action that is permitted by their personal religious teaching.  As we remember the Roe v. Wade decision, let us celebrate that it allows women to be respected as moral decision makers who are in control of their own bodies.

 

Harry Knox, National President Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice:

We celebrate the 40th Anniversary of Roe v. Wade at a time of increasing attacks on the very freedoms Roe provides.  The Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice is growing to meet these challenges so that people of faith will be heard in the public square calling prophetically for empowerment of women’s moral agency and expansion of access to compassionate abortion care.

 

Neil A. Corkery, former member of the RI House of Representatives, current member of the Board of Directors of Catholics for Choice:

Rhode Island was founded under a just doctrine: that individuals have the right to determine the course of their lives according to their personal beliefs. In this state there should be no question: every woman has the right to decide the future of her pregnancy according to her conscience, whatever her reasons or circumstances. A just society simply does not compel women to continue an undesired pregnancy.

 

Paula Hodges, RI Public Policy & Advocacy Director at PPSNE:

A majority of Americans oppose efforts to overturn Roe v. Wade, which was made crystal clear in November, when they voted to protect a woman’s ability to make her own personal medical decisions without interference from politicians. Legislators who interfere with a woman’s access to safe and legal abortion fail to recognize the views of their constituents.  It is time for Rhode Island to focus on helping women and families get access to preventive health services, annual exams and access to effective and affordable birth control.  In doing so we can work together to empower families, reduce unintended pregnancies and align Rhode Island with other New England states.

 

Kate Brock, executive director of Ocean State Action:

Today we are reminded of the great strides women have made in achieving full equality in Rhode Island and beyond. At the core of this progress is the ability to control one’s reproductive decisions, and they are decisions that belong with a woman, her family and her doctor, not politicians in the Statehouse.  

 

Carolyn Mark, president RI National Organization for Women:

On the 40th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, we need to remember that women’s reproductive rights have been and will always be inextricably linked to our ability to achieve economic and social equality in this country. When women have access to comprehensive reproductive health services, including abortion, we gain the capacity to participate fully in all aspects of public and private life. While there are forces in this country that seek to deny women our basic rights, there remains a persistent majority that respects the fact that decisions regarding reproductive health care are a matter of privacy and should remain that way. We can never go back.

New Leaders Council ’40 Under 40′ Event Saturday


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

The New Leaders Council Rhode Island will kick off their 2013 Institute this Saturday, January 26, and at 6:00pm, and invites the public to celebrate and support Rhode Island’s nominees for the national “40 Under 40” Awards.  This year’s event will be held at Asian Palace, 1184 N. Main St., Providence.

Rhode Island’s 2013 “40 Under 40” nominees are (bios follow):

  •  James Diossa – Mayor, City of Central Falls
  • Andy Posner – Capital Good Fund
  • Brett Smiley – Campaign Finance Officers, LLC

New Leaders Council (NLC) works to train and promote the progressive political entrepreneurs of tomorrow — trendsetters, elected officials and civically-engaged leaders who will shape the future landscape. NLC recruits young men and women from outside traditional power structures and equips them with the skills necessary to be leaders in their communities and workplaces.

Each year, the “40 Under 40” Award is presented as a way to honor the work of young, professional leaders who have exemplified the organization’s ideal of political entrepreneurship.

The citizens of Rhode Island are invited to meet these nominees, as well as our newly selected 2013 Fellows at our 40 Under 40 Awards Event. The ceremony features a thought-provoking and inspiring presentation by keynote speaker Charles Cole, III, 2011 NLC San Francisco alum and Bay Area Program Director of Juma Ventures.  Admission is $25 with RSVP through Facebook (search for “New Leaders Council Rhode Island”) or $35 at the door without RSVP.

I’ll be profiling the honorees this week on RIFuture, so check back to learn more about each of them.

Academic Argument for Equality: Introduction


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

I am a social psychologist and Emeritus Professor at the University of Rhode Island. For 17 years part of my teaching and research involved the study of gay and lesbian issues.  Much of this work centered on marriage equality for same-sex couples, which I continue to study and advocate.

I was impressed by Governor Chafee’s pledge to seek legislation for same-sex marriage as a contemporary reflection of Roger Williams’ view of our state as a vibrant, diverse, welcoming community. He correctly noted that marriage equality would not only “honor our forefathers who risked their lives and fortune in pursuit of human equality” but would also make a positive contribution to our economic climate.

In a series of posts this week, I will offer a succinct sample of recent economic and psychological research that strongly buttresses the case for same-sex civil marriage that you so movingly supported at your swearing-in.

Tthe psychological and economic research and public opinion polling provide impressive support and encouragement for same-sex marriage, the larger legal foundation for recognizing gay couples is the crucial base for full equality.  Simply put, civil marriage asserts that loving gay relationships are worthy of the privileges and responsibilities that come with civil marriage.  Gay couples deserve equal protection of state laws and public validation of their life together that marriage brings.

New Hampshire Gov. John Lynch said of his state’s law, “We are standing up for the liberties of same-sex couples by making clear that they receive the same rights, responsibilities–and respect–under New Hampshire law.”  Maine’s previous Governor John Balducci said their law reaffirms the separation of church and state and “guarantees that Maine citizens will be treated equally under Maine’s civil marriage laws and that is the responsibility of government.”

It is long past time for all branches of Rhode Island state government to show the same courage and civic responsibility of these two New England governors with respect to same-sex marriage and finally approve a same-sex marriage bill of our own.  Such a move will not only link our state to other social and economically progressive forces across the country, but will also identify us as a place where people can live out their lives with respect, support and dignity.

We could make Roger Williams proud!

Martin Luther King Jr. on Marriage Equality


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Almost 50 years after Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. gave his nation-changing “I have a dream” speech, Rhode Island still has yet to fully implement that dream. Indeed, here in the Ocean State, we are still practicing segregation. Marriage segregation.

“When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir,” said Dr. King said during his famous speech.”It is obvious today that America has defaulted on this promissory note insofar as her citizens of color are concerned.”

Insofar as the LGBTQ community is concerned, Rhode Island is defaulting on that promissory note.

And in terms of putting a civil rights issue such as same sex marriage on the ballot, King knew all too well that the majority don’t often support the rights of the minority. In his letter from Birmingham jail, he wrote, “We know through painful experience that freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed.”

His widow, Coretta Scott King, has become an outspoken advocate for same sex marriage rights. In 2003, she said: “I still hear people say that I should not be talking about the rights of lesbian and gay people. … But I hasten to remind them that Martin Luther King Jr. said, ‘Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.’ I appeal to everyone who believes in Martin Luther King Jr.’s dream, to make room at the table of brotherhood and sisterhood for lesbian and gay people.”

But the most relevant King passage on the struggle for marriage equality might be the end of his “Dream” speech:

I have a dream today.

I have a dream that one day every valley shall be exalted, every hill and mountain shall be made low, the rough places will be made plain, and the crooked places will be made straight, and the glory of the Lord shall be revealed, and all flesh shall see it together.

This is our hope. This is the faith that I go back to the South with. With this faith we will be able to hew out of the mountain of despair a stone of hope. With this faith we will be able to transform the jangling discords of our nation into a beautiful symphony of brotherhood. With this faith we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day.

This will be the day when all of God’s children will be able to sing with a new meaning, “My country, ’tis of thee, sweet land of liberty, of thee I sing. Land where my fathers died, land of the pilgrim’s pride, from every mountainside, let freedom ring.”

And if America is to be a great nation this must become true. So let freedom ring from the prodigious hilltops of New Hampshire. Let freedom ring from the mighty mountains of New York. Let freedom ring from the heightening Alleghenies of Pennsylvania!

Let freedom ring from the snowcapped Rockies of Colorado!

Let freedom ring from the curvaceous slopes of California!

But not only that; let freedom ring from Stone Mountain of Georgia!

Let freedom ring from Lookout Mountain of Tennessee!

Let freedom ring from every hill and molehill of Mississippi. From every mountainside, let freedom ring.

And when this happens, when we allow freedom to ring, when we let it ring from every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city, we will be able to speed up that day when all of God’s children, black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands and sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual, “Free at last! free at last! thank God Almighty, we are free at last!”

 

Arguing With The Tax Policy Switcheroo


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

I was or will be on Channel 10’s News Conference Sunday show this week, depending on when you’re reading this.  John Simmons, of the Rhode Island Public Expenditure Council, was a guest with me.  An exchange we had reminds me of many I’ve had recently, including this comment from Dan DaPonte, the Senate Finance Committee chair.

It is an unmistakable fact of legislation that Rhode Island repeatedly cut the income tax in the years 1997-2009.  We cut the tax 10% between 1997 and 2002, we cut the capital gains rate in 2005, and we implemented the “flat” tax option in 2006.  All of these constituted cuts that were either exclusively for the richest of tax payers or predominantly for that top end.  The graph here, an old favorite of mine, shows the effect of the various cuts on the top 1%, and the median taxpayer, along with the unemployment rate during the period, just for fun.

In 2010, the legislature adopted a tax change (for tax year 2011) that froze the flat tax option in place and incorporated it into the tax code, preventing it from being easily repealed.  There were a large number of changes made that year, and the jury is still out on whether that was an advantage for rich people or not.  It was not designed to be, and possibly it was not, though only time will tell for sure.

However, the fact that the 2010 change may have been essentially neutral does not change the fact that the previous 13 years were characterized by repeated tax cuts for rich people.  The Almond cuts alone were worth about $100 million per year by 2002.  Nonetheless, when you complain about tax cuts for rich people, people like Simmons and DaPonte reply that the 2010 changes were not a tax cut for rich people and therefore “progressives are wrong.”  Then they go off into the weeds trying to demonstrate conclusively that the 2010 changes were not tax cuts for the rich.  If you watch the Sunday show, you’ll see John doing exactly that, and then getting miffed when I interrupt to say that the answer he’s giving is irrelevant to the complaint I’m making.

Here’s DaPonte:

I’m still quite honestly confused at the liberal opinion that the 2010 personal income tax reform was a big giveaway to high-income earners. From everyone that I’ve heard from, particularly tax professionals who do this stuff for a living – they have a completely opposing opinion, that that is not, in fact, what we did do.

But what did you do during the previous decade?

Whether you think that tax cuts for rich people constitute enlightened public policy or whether you think that they were a source a source of great inequity in the tax code and a source of real pain for our cities and towns (and the people who pay property taxes), it is tiring to hear people try to deny what actually happened in the last decade and a half or to obfuscate the issue, which is precisely what’s going on here.

The state of Rhode Island gave up a tremendous amount of revenue to these tax cuts.  The cuts produced a tremendous amount of fiscal pain in the cities and towns, and contribute to the fact that so few school systems have anything like a real music program left or new books on their library shelves.  Whether they added something to our economy is debatable (and I’m happy to debate it) but 100% irrelevant to the claim that they happened.

The 2010/11 tax changes are a part of this story only to the extent that they make restoring the status quo ante far more difficult.  Other than that, they have nothing at all to do with the larger offenses against tax equity committed over the last 15 years.  When you talk to people about tax equity, don’t let the subject change.

Episcopal Bishop Strongly Supports Marriage Equality


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Rhode Island Episcopal Bishop Nicholas Knisely has come out in full support of marriage equality legislation before the General Assembly.

“Episcopalians are not unanimous in our views, but in the Episcopal Church we find our unity in common prayer, not in common opinion,” he said in a statement released today. “Part of what informs my opinion is that before I became a priest and then a bishop, I was a scientist. So I know the importance of trusting evidence that we see with our own eyes.”

RI Future reported last week that he personally supports same sex marriage rights and is instituting some changes at the church to allow for same sex marriage ceremonies.

Here’s his statement in full:

As the Episcopal Bishop of Rhode Island, I support the bill before the General Assembly that would allow same-sex couples to marry in our state, not in spite of my Christian faith, but because of it.

Episcopalians are not unanimous in our views, but in the Episcopal Church we find our unity in common prayer, not in common opinion. Even so, through many years of prayerful discussion, the majority of Christians in the Episcopal Church have come to believe that it is possible, and even common, for two people of the same-sex to live covenanted, faithful lives together in service to God, just as people in traditional marriages do. We have also learned that it is possible to protect the consciences of those who disagree within our church and still live together in community.

Part of what informs my opinion is that before I became a priest and then a bishop, I was a scientist. So I know the importance of trusting evidence that we see with our own eyes. I have seen what St. Paul describes as the fruits of the Holy Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) in the married lives of two men and of two women. I have seen relationships that are loving, mutual, and monogamous and that have lasted a lifetime. Jesus tells us that we must test each tree by looking at the goodness of its fruit (Luke 6:43-45). Across our congregations and communities, I can see the goodness of gay and lesbian couples and their families.

The Episcopal Church has been blessed for many years by the life and ministry of gay and lesbian couples, both lay and ordained. I have seen how they contribute to the common good of a congregation and a community by creating stable, loving homes. As a new citizen of Rhode Island, I am eager to see our state legislature join many others across the country in passing legislation to ensure civil marriage equality. I believe it is time for the State of Rhode Island to extend marriage equality to all of its citizens. I urge the legislature to pass House Bill 5015.

RIP Richard Walton: You Taught Us How to Live (Part 2/2)


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Richard shows his appreciation for the music at his Birthday Party June 1, 2008 (SRG)

Richard Walton touched so many, from students to advocates to the homeless to musicians to the oppressed. Richard was always there. Besides being so active in the community, he worked for 27 years as an adjunct professor at Rhode Island College.

A memorial and tribute for Richard is being held this Saturday at 3pm at the Roots Cultural Center, 276 Westminster Street Providence. You are invited to help us celebrate a life well lived. The mailing address for Amos House is P.O. Box 72873, Providence, RI 02907. They aceept on-line donation via credit card, including a space on the form for an “in memory of” designation. Read the first installment of this online memorial here.

Rhode Island College

Richard’s bereavement notice was sent out to the entire Rhode Island College community and the campus flag was flown at half staff.  RIC President Nancy Carriuolo wrote:

Office of the President
Dear Colleagues,

I have very sad news to share.  Richard Walton, beloved adjunct faculty member in the English Department and President of the Adjunct Faculty Union, passed away yesterday.  Please follow the link for more specifics http://news.providencejournal.com/breaking-news/2012/12/rhode-island-fixture-richard-j-walton-dies-at-age-84ready.html.

I have asked that the college flag be flown at half- mast in his memory.  Richard loved our college, the students and his colleagues.  He will be missed greatly by our campus community as well as by many others in RI who benefitted from his knowledge, concern, and generosity.

As any more information becomes available, my office will forward it to you.

Sincerely,
Nancy Carriuolo

 

Richard often got letters from students. The ‘you changed my life’ kind. He thought it was typical. He was irreplaceable. He was never negative about any of the students. That was one of the things people picked up from him.

Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 1:39:20 PM
To: Walton, Richard
Subject: Writing 100

Hello, Professor!

It’s been quite some time but I took your Writing 100 class my very first semester of college back in 2007 and my experience with you and that class has stayed with me throughout my undergraduate career. It remains one of my fondest memories to date. I wrote a piece on women and society’s beauty ideal that brought you to tears during discussion one day. I’m emailing you today because I recently had an idea for a children’s book and I’m not quite sure what the first step would be in producing such a thing or where to start. I would love to meet for coffee one day and discuss these ideas with you! I truly value your opinion and any advice you could give me. I hope this finds you healthy and happy on such a beautiful spring day!

________________________________________
From: Richard J. Walton [richard@RichardJWalton.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 4:36 PM

Subject: You’ve Made This Wintry Day Like Spring

What a nice surprise,  … after nearly five years!  I still remember the name but the face that goes with it is dancing just beyond my recall … but we can deal with that by having that coffee you suggest.  I’m on campus only on Mondays and Wednesdays for classes at 2 o’clock and 4 so perhaps we could meet sometime before my 2 o’clock. I’ve been teaching a lot of years and a rare note like yours is so very welcome, especially as I near the end of my teaching years.  Getting a book published is increasingly difficult and I’ve been away from publishing for a good many years.

Yet books are still being published and maybe our conversation would come up with something helpful so, yes, let’s have that coffee soon.  The Café is quite a nice place.

On this day that feels more like January than late March, you can imagine, I hope, how nice it was to receive your note, to be remembered fondly after so many years, so many classes.  I’m looking forward to our conversation.  Suggest a couple of times and we’ll pick the best one.  Again, thank you for that very nice note.

Richard Walton.  

P.S.  I still weep in class now and then.  I am so lucky to have taught for so many years.  Best job in the world

 

Maureen Reddy, Ph.D. Professor and Chair, Department of English, Rhode Island College

He was a wonderful colleague, adjuncting for 27 years. He taught Political Science and English… academic writing: Freshmen course. He gave students a place to write a lot with a lot of chances to revise. He got stellar evaluations from students who often went in kicking and screaming. All the “not me, I’m an Anthro.” majors. He converted them all. They didn’t want to take it but they loved it. He knew how to criticize without being hurtful. They slowly realized that it’s obvious that ‘he just wants us to be good writers’.

He was so sad about leaving RIC. He loved teaching. Last Spring, he told me ‘Ok, this is really it.’ We all threw a party but instead he got sick. He said, ‘No way could he be here in September but he would be there in the spring.’ But he can’t now.

Here’s an email he sent me. 5:55am ‘I walk up very concerned about one of my students. She wrote about suicide and I know they have vivid imaginations but I couldn’t ignore it. “I care about you” he wrote back. Who else is going to do this? 82 years old. Don’t worry about me. Perfect. Exactly the right balance, no insulting her. He was wonderful.

 

Jim Kittridge, Adjunct Faculty – RI College English Department

We started unionization in 2005 for the adjuncts as the only un-unionized group on campus. Richard’s greatest asset was his ability to communicate. He could talk with anybody. We was very valued because of that. When it came to it, there was no question he should be the 1st president. If anybody had the temperament, if anybody could talk to the adjuncts, it was Richard. He had a natural way with computers and inquiries and details all across the spectrum at RIC. He was part of the negotiating team that secured the 1st contract. 18 months of negotiations; very foundational proposals. He put a lot of effort into building those proposals. We were meeting 3-4 times a month, forging new ground. With his skills, he was uncanny in negotiating. He felt it was one of the best things he ever did. Genuine and meaningful.  He felt it was a legacy that will be passed on.

Adjuncts are hired on a course basis, semester by semester, limited to 2 courses to avoid benefits. Higher Ed is using this job definition more and more. Just like business. In business, they’re “independent contractors”. PHD’s are a dime a dozen these days. We get 300-400 applicants for a position. We’ve had a steady erosion of state legislative support over 20 years. Back then, 70% of the positions were full-time, now it’s barely above 50%. He had a great sense for justice. He just realized that they deserved to be recognized. And the union won! We got official recognition in approximately 2007. He negotiated 17 months for that 3 year contract (2009). He was an avid reader and could talk about anything. He was self-deprecating, down to earth, very reasonable, very level. A hard core group of 7-8 people brought this about.

He was grounded in equality. He fundamentally saw that (the union) as fundamental. The second round happened while he was in chemo. He was fatigued and tired, but his mind was still there. There were private meetings: went right to the heart of the matters. How to rebut… strategies… that kind of thing. They went on for 8 months in 2012. He missed the last two or three but he was still demanding to know about what went on. He had to know right away. Each year was different but the solidarity was steady.

All of us are equally saddened, it was very quick. We were going to give him a gift as this was his last year as president. He loved the RI College chairs because they were so comfortable. The weekend before Christmas, Saturday, we decided to make a surprise for him. We went in first and talked. Then we went out to the car and brought him back a chair. He was so happy; he was tickled pink. A few days later he was gone. He looked so good, like he had another several years left.

 

C. Kelly Smith, Community Advocate, Pawsox fan and volunteer at Stone Soup

Richard was a sweet guy with a good heart and his spirit was always so giving. I knew him through Stone Soup. He was at all the anti-war protests. He was always there. And at McCoy. We saw each other there a lot.

At Stone Soup, he was the constant reminder of stacking all the chairs and cups in the kitchen. I had to take his place once, and I felt like “How could I take his place?” He would get up and just start going “sssshhhh” and everybody would laugh. I tried to get a ticket to a sold out event once and Richard found out and got a mystery ticket left at the door. He made it possible for me to go. I loved having chats with him about world politics. Later in his life he got to do some of the traveling that he always wanted to do.

 

Carol and Henry Shelton, long time community activists and advocates for the poor in Rhode Island

We’ll always remember Richard’s long term service, his steadfastness, his actions, and his creative ideas at the Board meetings for the George Wiley Center. You always knew you could count on Richard. We’ll never forget what Richard’s question would be all the time on the finances: ‘Are we above water?’ Or ‘Are we sinking?’ But then that’s always the question, isn’t it. It never goes away.

Richard represents the best of community activism and peacemaking. His consistency in supporting low income and peace issues, in various parts of the world, is something you can never forget. He was an example for all of us. We all adhere to the common principles of justice, we all do what we can but it is always nice to see that dogged principle from those that made commitments that lasted their lifetime. He had a nice balance between peace making and a love of music and good beer and good times. We’ll always remember the Rhubarb pies that we made from his garden. We always a made a big pie for his party but sometimes it would go so quick we would make a 2nd pie just for him. His garden was another of his passions. We just got rid of the Thai hot peppers within the last week or so. He was a nice combination of love of a good party and activism. Every year, a large bag of Rhubarb that would arrive on the front porch. Hillary Salk’s granddaughter, Bianca, took Richard’s writing course, and graduated from Emerson College.  The recommendation that Richard wrote was absolutely splendid. It helped her get in. At RIC, we would always have a protest every week against the Iraq war. We did that for about a year. Richard was always there.

 

Jim Tull, Professor of Global Studies at Providence College and former Director of Amos House

His main contribution was to peace and justice work. I’ll never forget Richard’s style… he can get pretty sophisticated about foreign policy but he did not do that. He eschewed that side, his contribution was ‘This was wrong.’

Ironically, given his long career in journalism, he was not prone to getting very detailed about any particular issue. He presented himself, politically and morally, as a voice for peace and justice in the world. And he avoided conversations that distracted from that very fundamental imperative; that distracted from that moral conversation.

He did a panel once, with Mark Patinkin, on the 1st gulf war: He (Patinkin) couldn’t get Richard to say anything other than ‘War is only going to make everything worse. War has never served the function of making anything better.’ He would just not budge. Everybody else was talking about oil, the Kuwait invasion and the details of why we should go to war. ‘War is never going to be the answer.’ And I kind of wanted to shake him, because I knew he could argue. But he would not budge. Richard knew that no argument for War was going to make anybody’s life any better. Despite his expertise, he just said no.

His style was as a creature of habit. He didn’t just go occasionally, he would go every week. Eleven years in front of the federal building, protesting the war in Central America. He locked in habits. Aristotle defined virtue as a habit. He only stopped doing something if hell freezes over. He makes commitments and then he habituates that commitment. I’ve never met anybody in my entire life that approached peace and justice that way. Every Friday, we would retire to the Custom House after the vigil. He was always open to a good beer or two.

Most people who are 83 years old just want to sit home. We used to go to McCoy stadium and we would pick up people along the way. They didn’t even know we were coming. We would just grab them. That was Richard.

 

Phil Edmonds, Irish musician and community advocate

Along with some people like Catherine Rhodes, Jim Tull, and myself, we would try to get a little sleep inside refrigerator boxes on the cold steps of the Federal Building near Kennedy Plaza. One memorable night, I remember this sight of Richard wrapped in a sleeping bag, pacing the sidewalk all night during the freezing, sleepless, ‘Sleep Out to End Homelessness’ that took place many years ago on the Martin Luther King Holiday in January. I’ll never forget that one.

Another vision is of him being escorted by the police out of Rep. Ron Machtley’s Pawtucket office for a sit-in, protesting the Congressman’s support of the U.S. War in El Salvador in the late 80s.

Richard also loved to volunteer at Amos House’s Men’s Residence, especially on Christmas Eve so he could pass out gifts on Christmas Day to the men who were homeless.  He volunteered at Amos House for decades. He loved that.

Those are the ways I will always remember Richard.

 

Richard’s Birthday parties, Annual Events that were not to be Missed

His parties were where you experienced the true scope of his influence. Hundreds of people from all walks of life would come to his house in Warwick, overlooking Pawtuxet Cove, bringing food, instruments and checkbooks for Amos House.

This is the original invite that has been passed along over the years:

Hi, As many of you know, a long time ago when Richard
Walton was about to turn 60, a bunch of his Stone Soup
friends [Jann Campbell, Joyce Katzberg, Jane Murphy,
Steve Snyder, Bill Harley, Debbie Block and others]
decided that this milestone should be celebrated with
a party.
   Sounded like a good idea to Richard but since he
didn’t want any gifts, he decided to make it a benefit
for Amos House [where he has now been a volunteer for
decades] and the Providence-Niquinohomo Sister City
Project [he’s been there numerous times].  The party
was such a success, not only as a party right there
on the shores of Pawtuxet Cove but it raised a couple
of thousand dollars.  So when the next year rolled
around Richard decided to repeat the party, calling it
his 60th Birthday Party, Part II.  It too raised a
fair amount of money so he decided to make it an annual
event, in five-year increments of Part I, Part II, etc.
And over the years we’ve raised about $75,000, not so
bad for friends making donations at a party.
   Last year’s was 80th Birthday Party, Part IV and
as spring approached his year, people began asking about
Part V … but Richard felt himself running out of steam.
He was in a dilemma: he didn’t want to just abandon what
has become something of a tradition but he didn’t have
the energy to pull together another 200-person party.
What to do?  Then Bill Harley had a good idea: maybe it
could be held at Len Cabral’s fine arts center/club, the
Roots Café, in the space formerly occupied by the Black
Rep Theatre, 276 Westminster St..  Len thought it was a good
idea so that’s what’s going to happen: Sunday afternoon [2
to 6], May 27.  It’ll be much like the parties at the Walton
Compound: people will make donations to one or both charities,
they’ll bring delicious pot luck dishes [drinks will be
available at Roots] and it will be another wonderful afternoon
and Amos House and the Sister City Project will again benefit.
   So this is a long-winded invitation and since the 80th
Birthday Party, Part V is a week earlier than usual and at
a different place, we’re hoping you’ll spread the word
as far and as wide as possible.  And I hope to see you
there.  Richard.
   P.S.  Will this be my Last Hurrah?  At my age, who can
say.  Check with us a year from now.”

 

His last invite to his last party is a treasure I’ll always preserve.

From: Richard J. Walton [ mailto:richard@RichardJWalton.org ]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 2:44 PM
To: Stephen Graham
Subject: Please Spread the World about Party Sunday Afternoon, May 27 at Roots

Hi, Steve:  I’m so damn disorganized.  I’ve probably already asked you this but I wanted to make sure.  You have such a wide circle of friends and I hope you are spreading the word about my 80th Birthday Party, Part V on Sunday afternoon, May 27 at Roots.  I just ran out of steam and didn’t have the energy to pull together another big party here … but Bill Harley and Len Cabral had the terrific idea of holding it at Roots, a damn good place.  This may well be my Last Hurrah but I didn’t want what had become a tradition to end with no notice.  I hope it’s a success.  More details follow (as written by my anonymous helper)…

and I certainly expect to see you there.  Thanks for your help.  Richard.

You are invited to help us remember and celebrate Richard’s life this Saturday (1/19/13) at 3pm at the Roots Cultural Center 276 Westminster St. Providence

Photos from Richard’s Birthday party in 2008 are available here.

 

Writing this has been so hard. You can’t include everyone; he traveled in wide, wide circles; only he knew what they all were. The sadness still abounds.

Richard still lives in our memories. His heart was the biggest I’ve ever known. It welcomed everyone and everybody. Not in an over-the-top, you’re my best buddy way but with a warm smile, sincere eyes and patient listening. Richard Walton let you know right away that he was you’re friend; a skill very few of us develop with such intensity. He leaves behind a legacy of living by example, of showing us how to be. He made me, and numerous others, a better person. It doesn’t get much better than that.

Tobin Aligns With Hate Group to Oppose Equality


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

FAPSMEG (the Faith Alliance to Preserve the Sanctity of Marriage as Established by God)  is a coalition of religious and political groups, brought together by the executive director of NOM-RI, Christopher Plante, to fight against marriage equality rights. The coalition marks the first time the local Catholic church, and perhaps the first diocese anywhere, has joined forces with an organization the Southern Poverty Law Center has identified as a hate group.

MassResistance has erroneously claimed that pro-equality groups supporting anti-bullying programs in schools “actually want to lure children into homosexuality and, very possibly, sadomasochism,” according to the SPLC. Its founder and executive director Brian Camenker has erroneously claimed that in Massachusetts “gays were trying to get legislation passed to allow sex with animals,” according to the SPLC.

In an interview yesterday, Mark Potok, a senior fellow with the Southern Poverty Law Center told me:

In our experience, it is highly unusual for the Catholic Church to work with groups like MassResistance, which has repeatedly, and utterly falsely, linked homosexuality to pedophilia, among other things. This is a group that lumps homosexuality in with criminal behaviors like bestiality, claims gay people are dangerous to children, and says, again falsely, that no gay people were murdered in the Holocaust.

I should add, however, that we’ve not seen any real history of the Catholic Church working with hate groups. It may be that in this case they’ve simply failed to look into the background of the group they’re allying themselves with. At least I hope so.

I hope so as well.

I call upon Bishop Thomas Tobin and the Providence Diocese to repudiate the ugly comments and hateful views of MassResistance and Brian Camenker. I would hope that this alliance was made in haste and in error, and that the Catholic Church would not want to make alliances with groups that put to a lie the Bishop’s assertion that individuals with same-sex attraction are to be treated with respect.

The Roman Catholic position on same-sex marriage is well known. They  believe it is sinful and are against it. But as Bishop Thomas Tobin states, in an editorial reprinted on the FAPSMEG website:

It’s important to emphasize once again, however, that while rejecting homosexual activity, the Catholic Church has consistently promoted respect and pastoral care for individuals with same-sex attraction. They are children of God and our brothers and sisters.

This is the concept of hating the sin but not the sinner, and I get that. MassResistance, under the leadership of Brian Camenker, does not share this sentiment.

State of the State Analysis: No Recovery Package


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Governor Chafee’s State of the State speech, announcing his budget proposal, strikes a fine balance between solutions and inaction. Woefully inadequate as his proposals are, Governor Chafee does appear to have a reasonable grasp of the problems facing our great state.

On social issues, Chafee proposes popular, common-sense solutions like tweaks to gun laws and ending marriage discrimination, but when it comes to his core task, revitalizing the state’s economy, it is a different story. After accurately laying out the multitude of problems facing our state, the governor proposes to do nearly nothing.

Unlike Carcieri and the General Assembly, Chafee understands that we cannot simply dump more problems onto already strapped municipal budgets. Since 2007, state aid has fallen by 60%, devastating communities all around Rhode Island. To fill this $150 million hole, Chafee has recommended $20 million.

Noting that “there is simply no more important investment we can make than in our schools and the potential of our students,” the governor makes a powerful case for investing in education. But his proposal to maintain and fully fund the current school funding formula is hardly a bold investment in the future. Nor is the proposal for a $6 million increase in aid to CCRI, RIC, and URI, which will only materialize if those institutions freeze tuition and make $6 million in cuts.

Chafee correctly points out that Rhode Island’s refusal to maintain our infrastructure winds up costing us more in the long run. “We must invest in our infrastructure,” he insists. However, the $14 million the governor is proposing for maintenance at vocational schools cannot be counted as a serious commitment to infrastructure. That figure is less than a hundredth of what the American Society of Civil Engineers estimates we need spend on water infrastructure alone.

Largely contracted out to a business lobby, the “Moving the Needle” report produced by the state Senate harps on the business tax climate indices, which Republicans have invented so that there can be economic metrics red states will do well on. Chafee is right to reject these silly rankings. And this refusal to play by Republican rules allows him to see that “the property tax is the real major barrier to economic growth.”

This is strong rhetoric. But the governor’s tiny down payment on state aid to cities and towns will do little to alleviate property tax hikes.

Perhaps Chafee’s boldest proposal is to cut the special tax exemption that CVS benefits from and use the revenue to pay for a reduction in the corporate income tax from 9% to 7%. Getting CVS to pay a higher rate is probably a good thing for Rhode Island, although as a free-market liberal, I am highly susceptible to the argument that our current tax code discriminates against retailers for no good reason. If the Woonsocket-based chain agreed to a tax hike in negotiations with Chafee, then we owe them a debt of gratitude.

A cut in the corporate tax rate, however, is rather silly. If you want to reduce taxation on businesses, it would do far more good to the economy to focus on tax cuts that help startups and small businesses or remove market distortions. This is hardly a controversial principle. Rhode Island’s tax code is unusually hard on small businesses, the engine of our economy. For instance, the $500 minimum tax, which is levied even when a business has no profits, is essentially meaningless for large, successful corporations, but can impose a serious burden on small start-ups. Similarly, the network of licensing fees Rhode Island is famous for barely matter to large corporations but can be a nightmare for small ones. Another option that would be more beneficial to small businesses would be to adopt a progressive corporate income tax instead of the flat 9% rate we have now. Chafee could have taken any of these proposals to maximize the effect of his tax cut. Instead, he chose to cut corporate taxes in one of the least beneficial ways. Bolder business tax cuts, apparently, were off the table.

While Chafee clearly understands the problems facing our state—municipal budget cuts, weakened educational institutions, crumbling infrastructure, and an anti-business tax code—he proposes to do basically nothing about any of these problems. The reason is simple. He refuses to end the tax breaks for the rich that created this budget mess in the first place. Without new revenue or debt, there is no way you can fund a recovery package. These are the cold, hard facts of math.

RIP Richard Walton: You Taught Us How to Live (Part 1/2)


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Richard at the annual May Pole Dance at Sandywoods Farm – Tiverton, RI – May 4, 2008 (SRG)

Shock turned into sadness for many long time activists here in Rhode Island over the holiday season when, on December 27th, Richard Walton, in his 80th year (for the 4th time) passed away from leukemia after a number of treatments and hospital stays.

The shock, for many of us, is in how quickly the end came. He was with friends on Christmas Eve and two days later, he was gone.

An era is over.

A fixture at so many events, and with so many organizations, that they all seem changed now, never to be the same. He was an anchor to many, an inspiration to more. Most of the time he was quiet, but his eyes were vigilant, observing all that was going on.

He loved music, beer, gardening, teaching, baseball and helping people. He advocated for the homeless, stood with strikers, protested against war and stood up for the hungry and those in desperate need. He was a scholar, an activist, an author, reporter, a mentor and a wonderfully, good friend. He touched so many.

A memorial and tribute for Richard is being held this Saturday at 3pm at the Roots Cultural Center, 276 Westminster Street Providence. You are invited to help us celebrate a life well lived. The mailing address for Amos House is P.O. Box 72873, Providence, RI 02907. They aceept on-line donation via credit card, including a space on the form for an “in memory of” designation: https://www.amoshouse.com/tabid/209/default.aspx

One story leads to another… and then another and another and another.  What follows are the thoughts and reactions of some of those who knew him.

Karen Malcolm – lived with Richard for 10 years with her daughter Erin

We had just spent Christmas eve with him. We just didn’t think it was that imminent. He didn’t like living with the stillness. It’s like losing a grandparent.

Journal article captured his totality. There was this side of him that was so close to family and friends. He was always 150% committed, centered around Stone Soup, Nicaragua, and his students. He woke up to Classical music every morning, reading and grading for the day. He loved to cook, and volunteering at Amos house; he didn’t like being idle. Working, music or traveling were all connected. He felt his students needed a wider view, a connection to the larger world. He saw folk music as connected to mental health, homelessness and making a better world. He was optimistic but melancholy too. He had a belief in people’s essential goodness; except every single person for who they were. He had an intimate hope and empathy for people’s individual and collective structures. It’s going to be a great loss.

He was a bit of a homebody. He cultivated an image for himself. When he was running for Vice President (with the Citizen’s Party), he wanted to be out splitting wood when they arrived so they would see the old Yankee at work. He had such a good sense of humor, always made fun of himself.

When traveling, he would access the culture through food; stalking all the neighborhoods, and looking over the menus on the local eateries wherever the locals ate. He took local transportation – no first class for Richard… always traveling with the people. It was always such an experience and so much fun. He would make friends with travelers and local people and he would follow up even years later and they were always happy to see him. It was his way of having a true experience.

He and Erin became very close. It was wonderful for her, even as a little kid. Once, in France, when she was 8 or 9, we met one of his students and spent a whole day on a French farmhouse. We had bread and wine and escargot. No English and only a little bit of French so we had fun navigating the whole experience. What a time we had. You could always count on him. He had a true commitment and was able to balance that with fun and work and travel in his life.

Most of us get so involved in our focus but he had such a wide level that is not something everybody could do. I just really admire that in him. I learned a lot about my own life. He walked the talk. If it’s true of anybody, it’s true of Richard.

 

Bill Harley – one of the founders of Stone Soup and one of his closest friends

He was so charismatic. He was my greatest cheerleader in some ways. He was always there. He filled this space that I don’t think anybody else can fill now.

I think that Richard’s genius was that he was definitely not doctrinaire. What he really wanted was for everybody to get along and everybody to be taken care of. He had a politics of kindness. He would support the cause with his presence and example. He was a Uniter; especially on a grassroots level.

‘When I feed the hungry, they call me a saint. When I call for change they call me a communist.’

We’re all going to miss him more than any of us realized.

 

Debbie Block – wife and producer of Bill Harley, was also one of Richard’s closest friends

He was larger than life. He was a model of what you get when you pay attention to your better angels. He was an incredible teacher. That’s one of the other things that was most inspiring: how did you use your gift? And he lived so simply. That’s something else to admire. He’s going to be missed for a long time. I do hope we take that part of Richard that we admired and go forward and make it a part of what we do.

Often in life joy and sorrow live side by side. That’s just one of the things we have to deal with.

 

Joyce Katzberg – long time activist and folk singer, another founder of Stone Soup

I just saw him at a party on the 23rd. It really hit me… we were caught by surprise… I went over and gave him a kiss on the cheek. He was a fabulous drinking partner. And he was a part of so many different communities. He brought together so many communities from very different places.

Richard Walton was not afraid to use the F-word; and by the F-word I mean fascism. Richard was always the moderating voice. He had a great sense of humor. I loved that he saw things on his own terms. He didn’t need to conform to the tie and suit crowd.

I will never forget sleeping out with Richard on Representative Claudine Schneider’s office lawn one very cold and icy night. Richard and I told stories and laughed most of the night away as we were side by side, each in our refrigerator boxes. For years after that, when he would introduce me at Stone Soup Coffee house, he would teasingly brag that he had “slept” with me. LOL! “I’m very proud of the fact that I’ve slept with Joyce Katzberg.” I’m having a hard time dealing with Stone Soup. I’m sad for myself and everybody else. Richard led a glorious life. The sadness is for those who are left behind.

It reminds me how lucky we are that we have this activist community. There are some people who are ‘hugs’ people and he was certainly one of them. He didn’t need to label you. And he was able to retain respectful relationships with people who were 180 degrees from him. He came from a place of deep respect. He was much more interested in getting work done. That is so rare.

That leaves us as the new, old guard. All the people who taught me are almost all gone. The pain you feel is almost in direct proportion to the love you felt.

 

Dennis Byrnes – Richard’s cousin and long time activist

My mother always talked about him. I met him later in life. He had dealings with Alger Hiss, you know. He interviewed him when he was a Daily News reporter in NY, I think, during the McCarthy era. His book about Kennedy got him on the Merv Griffin show. He was so inquisitive, was always ahead on the issues. In his gentle manner, he always managed to get his point across. He hardened my feelings on activism. Mother collected everything about Richard. His mother Gertrude took in anyone during the Depression. Richard gave a lot of his money away for the benefit of the people of Nicaragua and others. If he heard you had problems, he would be there. He was never afraid to be out there. Cold, wind… it would never occur to him to be anywhere else if you were a true American – unselfish.

He knew how to talk to both sides of the fence. How could you not like Richard? You would warm right up to him. And he had the oddest assortment of friends; right, left, they all respected him.

I was stunned when I heard he was gone. It was the finality of it. To never ask him what he thought again… He always gave his absolute honest opinion. He would give you all the time that you needed. And he always got back to you.

 

Dana Holmgren – long time friend and traveling companion with Niquinohomo Sister City Project

In 1987 a group of Rhode Islanders went again to Nicaragua, this time to build a school a couple miles out of town.  The group had brought down bicycles to use in our daily commute and then distribute to the community afterwards.  The bike distribution process amongst us brigadistas was fairly haphazard… I ended up, for my two weeks, with an undersized banana seat bike.  Riding it was bothering my knees a bit, young as I was at the time. I did, however, figure I was entitled, somehow, to a ride-able bike as I, as a nurse, was also the health person ‘responsible’ for the group. While talking with a few people, I floated the idea of a  bike rotation amongst the brigadistas, for the selfish purpose of relieving my knees. Richard, who had a great bike, and who had to have been around 60 at the time, immediately offered to trade bikes with me.  I was completely chagrined about my whining and shut up immediately.

Richard continued to visit his host family in Niquinohomo for many years, long after the Sister City Project was no longer sending work brigades, and continued to benefit Niquinohomo (as well as Amos House) via his now legendary birthday parties on the Bay.

 

Rick Wahlberg  – long time friend and past-president of Stone Soup

He was a like a grandfather. Community was his gift. Hope. Nobody should feel sad; he’s at peace. He is. He brought people together. He was not afraid of influencing you through non-violence, you would come along eventually. He was just a reasonable man. There are very few of them out there. He was friends with republicans! He was literally a real friend.

 

Tony Affigne – long time friend and Professor of Political Science at Providence College

 I knew him for 30 years. He was my campaign manager in 1986 when I was the Citizen’s party candidate for governor. He was instrumental in formulating our fair labor policy progressive statement: minimum wage, bargaining rights, labor rights, alternative energy – using Quonset for windmills, solar; Central America policy – support for the people of El Salvador. His writing ability gave him lots of credibility. Back then, the RI National Guard built roads for the army to attack the rebels and the Governor of RI was the Commander in Chief. He had an idea to paint all of the National Guard vehicles white for emergency, environmental response units.

The first Green Party meeting was in 1992. Richard was always the stalwart through all the turbulent times and had a clear vision: the Democratic Party was where progressive ideas go to die. He traveled all over the world and gave voice to foreign policy, history and contemporary politics. He kept the minutes of 6-hour national meetings, one of a handful of leaders because of his long experience. If Jill stein had gotten 5% of the RI vote, he would have been the convener of the party.

He always did the hard work, so that it would always be there, always be ready in the future, when the time came. The public would realize that there was not another option. And when it was the most discouraging, he didn’t feel like he had wasted his time: someday the Green party would be there. But he had a long life before the green party too.

He spent Christmas with the homeless and was the first to write about it. He knew that the best way to write their stories was to live with them; and lovingly tell their story. He wrote about them not to make himself famous but to really bring home to RI the plight of real people, the normalcy, to show that they were just like us. He wanted to really humanize the struggles about housing.

Richard’s art was always to make progressive politics normal to people, taking care of people, The thought came naturally, he would wake up each day and know that he was part of the society and he recognized that he had a responsibility to give back, to take care of others.

Richard walked the picket line at Brown & Sharpe when he was campaign manager for Hillary Salk’s Citizen’s party campaign for governor. Margaret Kann, Paul McNeil… Joe Buck was involved. We met and put together a campaign for the run for governor. We held our first press conference in South Providence. We knew it would impact coverage but it was the right thing to do. The Press wouldn’t come because they thought the equipment was unsafe at the corner of Public and Broad.  People needed to know that there was a party and campaign that cared. He walked from Pawtuxet to the office.

The Green party formed after the Exxon Valdez incident. The Citizen’s party was national; the Green party was international. It was a way to make progress if not here then in other states that it would trickle over to.

I think he started Stone Soup to keep himself grounded and alive. He got as much out of it as he contributed to it. He still felt hopeful because he kept seeing young people every year learning the skills.

Part 2 is available Here

North Providence Is Energized By Solar Project


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Mayor Charles Lombardi, left, discusses the merits of the solar landfill project with Town Council President Kristen Catanzaro, center, and member Alice Brady. (Tim Faulkner/ecoRI News)

NORTH PROVIDENCE — Local solar energy got a boost Tuesday night from the Town Council.

At the urging of Mayor Charles Lombardi, the council voted unanimously to move ahead with a plan to consider dropping property taxes for the development of a solar array at the town’s old landfill.

Lombardi has implored the council for several months to move forward with the project, to take advantage of a state renewable energy incentive program — a program that would deliver reliable revenue to the town. Six solar developers responded to an initial inquiry to develop a 3-megawatt array on the 15-acres site.

Lombardi said the town would receive an annual fee from the owner of the solar array in lieu of taxes. Other proposed uses for the site, he said, such as a playground and wind turbines weren’t viable due to noise and gas leaking from the former Superfund site.

“We’re trying to get additional revenue from a barren piece of property,” the mayor said.

A solar project, Lombardi added, would allow the town to participate in Rhode Island’s popular distributed generation program. The four-year trial program is designed to boost local renewable energy projects by offering incentives such as fixed pricing for electricity generated from wind, solar and hydroelectric projects.

Two residents spoke at the Jan. 8 meeting. Joseph Muschiano was skeptical of a project that had yet to receive a formal bid from a developer. “You’re just asking us to throw away 20 years of taxes and letting this guy come in,” he said.

James Grande liked that the project was quiet, unlike the dirt bikes and four-wheelers that frequent the area. “You want something that’s not going to create any noise versus creating noise,” he said.

Of the six initial proposals, the town has taken an interest in a submission from Belmont, Calif.-based SunEdison. All of the developers sought tax relief before moving forward with the project, Lomabrdi said. The Town Council must approve the tax deal. Tuesday’s vote by the council requests the town’s ordinance committee to move forward with the mayor’s request to grant the tax break.

Richard Fossa, Lombardi’s chief of staff, said the land isn’t suited for businesses or recreation. “You are not going to get any restaurant or people on the grass. Nobody wants to go there,” Fossa said.

Lombardi noted that the site currently has no access to public water, sewage or electricity.

The state Department of Environmental Management (DEM) classified the site as suitable for a solar project, according to Fossa. If built, the town would be responsible for cutting the grass at the site and monitoring environmental conditions at the former landfill. The owner of the project would pay the cost of building a fence around the site. DEM allows new construction to disturb 30 inches of the landfill topsoil, or cap. But Fossa said the solar project wouldn’t require digging and instead be secured by weights.

Chris Kearns of the state Office of Energy Resources presented an overview of the state’s distributed generation contract law, which the General Assembly passed in 2011. The program reserves an allotment of generated electricity each year to be used for renewable projects. The electricity is typically more expensive than standard fossil-fuel-based power. The cost for the green energy is subsidized by National Grid ratepayers.

Renewable energy, Kearns said, is needed to diversify Rhode Island’s power generation supply. Currently, about 98 percent of the state’s electricity is produced by natural gas. The proposed project also would help the state reach its goal of 16 percent renewable power generation by 2019.

So far, 15 solar projects and one wind turbine have been approved under the distributed generation program. Of the municipally backed projects, East Providence received a contract for a 3.7-megawatt solar landfill project. Westerly is considering a similar solar array on town land. Kearns said Bristol and Glocester are seeking permits for large solar energy systems.

The 70-acre site in North Providence was an active regional landfill from 1967-83. It was declared a Superfund site in 1989 and capped in 2007.

“I think this the best idea for the neighborhood,” Council member Stephen Feola said. “This isn’t going to generate any traffic. It’s a win-win. It’s a no-brainer.”

By TIM FAULKNER/ecoRI News

ecoRI News is a Providence-based nonprofit journalistic initiative devoted to educating readers about the causes, consequences and solutions to local environmental issues and problems.

RI Educators Honor Sandy Hook Students, Teachers


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Rhode Island’s two biggest teachers’ unions, NEA-RI and the RINFT, are holding a flashlight vigil for the victims of the Newton tragedy tonight at 6 pm at the West Warwick Civic Center. Donations are being collected to send to the teachers of Sandy Hook Elementary School to use on classroom supplies.

State of the State Analysis: Some Highs, Many Lows


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Gov. Chafee delivers his State of the State speech.

On the whole Governor Chafee’s speech was disappointing.

The first big budget item: no increases in taxes or fees. So much for tax equity. In fact the corporate tax rate is to go down from 9% to 7%.

There are more millions for many worthy projects/areas: K-12 education, higher education,  infrastructure, property tax relief, and workforce development are some. No new sources of funding for the above were mentioned. So how do we pay for all of this? This was not specifically addressed by the Governor.

There was no mention of increased funding for social programs, in fact it sounded like the usual ‘hard decisions’ will be made on the backs of the disadvantaged via decreased funding. Such cuts may be one of the sources of the increased spending elsewhere in the budget.

Governor Chafee also said how well the state government works now. With all due respect, what about the poor service to the unemployed after all of the DLT staffing cuts?

There was some good news on social issues: continued strong support for marriage equality, gun control proposed, and more support for veterans. However, there was no mention of women’s health issues,  nor tax equity (see above).

On the whole the speech came across as somewhat feel-good-with-no-pain, that is, kind of unrealistic. Hopefully my concerns will not be realized.

State of State Analysis: Optimist-in-Chief


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Governor Chafee was a man confident of what our government can achieve in the annual State of the State speech. He’s optimistic about what Rhode Islanders can achieve with steady hard work, and willing to boast about it. In that pride and his faith in government, I would call it progressive in its essentials.

But there are things I worry about in the Governor’s budget proposal.

He points out in his address that, “Shortsighted decisions in better times left us struggling to provide the most basic services,” and yet has chosen not to propose undoing those decisions.  Presumably being rebuffed two years in a row by the Assembly has weakened his appetite for that kind of battle, but it is disappointing that the Governor will apparently not be a voice for tax equity at the state house.

I also worry about his proposal to lower the state’s corporate income tax.  There are some good parts to this.  Chafee suggests that we offset the cost by reducing the benefit of the Jobs Development Tax Credit by 50%.  This tax credit cost us $16.4 million last year (see here), and CVS took $15.4 million of it, so cutting this by 50% means cutting our subsidy to CVS by almost $8 million, something I can certainly support since I’m not at all clear why CVS needs a subsidy from state taxpayers.  Overall, though, doing anything at all to reduce state revenue certainly works against what Chafee says is among his priorities, lowering the state’s reliance on the property tax.

On that point, Chafee was slightly apologetic, but firm: “I may sound like a broken record at this point, but in the years before I took office, cities and towns bore the brunt of the downturn in state revenues. Those most severely affected were the distressed communities that could least afford it.”

He is proposing some new state aid, some of which will go to the state’s poorest cities and towns, but the $30 million he proposes isn’t much.  By themselves, the budgets of Providence, Woonsocket, Pawtucket, Central Falls, East Providence, and West Warwick add up to more than $1.4 billion, so we’re talking about adding 2% to that mix.  It’s not completely clear how much that can help.

Chafee justly boasts about fully funding the state’s education funding formula, while glossing over the many ways in which the formula is neither fair nor adequate.  And he does propose increasing state aid to the state colleges by $6 million, while in the same sentence demanding they cut $6 million more from their budget.  With luck and a new education board, he’ll get cuts from administration and overhead and not from programs, but I’d like to see the cuts before deciding whether this is the way to go.

About economic development he said, “My hope is that you all will be skeptical and wary of deviating from the steady, methodical construction of a Rhode Island economy built for today and for the future.” He explicitly cautioned against looking for the quick fixes, and pays special attention to the risks of ex-baseball players. And I also enjoyed his expression of skepticism about the many rankings that always seem to so upset people here.”

Overall, I have to agree with Chafee that he is moving us in the right direction. “The state of our state is steadily improving,” he said.  And I appreciate his refrain throughout the speech about the slow-and-steady time scale of lasting improvements.  Unfortunately, some of the problems are substantially larger than the scale of the solutions he proposes.  Again, it’s hard to fault a man who has been turned back by the legislature so firmly the past two years.  The dismal state of the state’s budget is really their doing, and Chafee’s administration is doing its best to make the best of a bad hand.

Tax inequity has economic consequences as it deprives people who spend the bulk of their income of money to spend. Over-reliance on the property tax has economic consequences to both businesses and citizens that far outweigh the effect of state taxes.  Funding inequity among our cities and towns has social consequences that far outweigh the savings the rich enjoy from the past several years of tax cuts.

To his credit, the Governor addresses all of these in his budget, but the solutions he proposes are within the radically constrained limits set by General Assembly leaders who choose to ignore or belittle the biggest challenges we face.

Read Chafee’s State of State Speech; Budget Proposal


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Below this graphic are the prepared remarks of Gov. Chafee tonight. You can read his proposed FY 2014 Budget Summary here.

Mr. Speaker, Madam President, members of the General Assembly, Congressman Langevin, fellow General Officers, members of the Judiciary, distinguished guests, and my fellow Rhode Islanders,

I am honored to join with you tonight in our beautiful State House. This building is both a symbol of Rhode Island’s proud and prosperous past and a beacon of hope reminding us that our brightest days are still ahead.

It is a pleasure and a privilege to work in this building and in this great state. Nothing could give me more satisfaction than helping to achieve progress on many fronts in Rhode Island.

Our state has gone through incredibly tough times recently. The national recession has taken its toll on our economy, our businesses, and, most dramatically, our people. Short-sighted decisions in better times left us struggling to provide the most basic services.

But Rhode Island is strong. And tonight we begin a new year with new opportunities to continue Rhode Island’s recovery.

There is a popular saying that bears repeating tonight. It goes: “Don’t tell me what your priorities are. Show me your budget, and I’ll tell you what they are.”

Well, anyone wondering what my priorities are should read the budget I respectfully submit to you tonight. It continues the path that I believe will make Rhode Island a stronger state in both the near- and long-term future.

I submit this budget to the General Assembly on January 16th – on time and the earliest that a Governor has done so in over two decades.

Thanks to good management and good decisions, we have ended the past two fiscal years with surpluses. This was achieved by able and dedicated Cabinet directors. They have worked together with common purpose to provide quality services at a rate that is mindful of the taxpayers. Thank you to these dedicated public servants in all the departments of state government.

Our revenues are exceeding projections. This is another indication that the state is being run well – being managed responsibly – and that more and more each day people and businesses are investing and spending here. We are providing certainty, predictability, and stability. And that’s what businesses demand to have the confidence to create jobs in Rhode Island.

The budget I present to you tonight contains no increase in taxes, fees, or charges of any kind. Not only are there no tax or fee increases, I also propose lowering our corporate tax from 9.0 percent to 7.0 percent over the next three years. This will put Rhode Island’s rate below that of both our neighboring states.

We have avoided tax increases and are lowering the corporate rate through both good fiscal management and a strengthening economy. As we move forward, it is important to keep investing in the building blocks of this progress – that is, investing in education, infrastructure, and workforce development.

Throughout my career in public service, I have been committed to quality public education. There is simply no more important investment we can make than in our schools and the potential of our students. My commitment to education continues with this budget.

In 2010, the General Assembly worked with Commissioner Gist on behalf of our students to pass the state’s school aid formula. In this budget, I have once again provided the resources to fully fund the formula, including all categorical aid programs. This year, that amounts to $30.3 million in additional state education aid.

I have also allocated over $14 million to support repairs at the state’s vocational education facilities.

But the state’s responsibility to our students goes beyond K-12 schools. We must also do all we can to ensure that motivated and hardworking Rhode Islanders can attain a quality college education. And we must ensure that they can do so without taking on mounting levels of debt. The biggest barriers to these goals are ever-increasing tuition rates.

Therefore, in an effort to ensure that there is no tuition increase next year at the Community College of Rhode Island, Rhode Island College, or the University of Rhode Island, I propose an increase of $6 million for higher education.

However, the leadership of these institutions must meet me halfway. If they can achieve $6 million in total savings and efficiencies, coupled with my $6 million in additional funding, we can guarantee the students of these schools no tuition increase next year.

When you pass this budget, we will have invested $115 million in public K-12 and higher education in Rhode Island over the past three years.

It also is important to bear in mind that Rhode Islanders looking for work need to be ready not only for today’s economy, but for the economy of tomorrow. And Rhode Island employers looking to hire or expand need to have confidence that there will be qualified candidates to fill available positions. Therefore, I propose $3 million in new state support for workforce development initiatives.

I also want to applaud the good work of the Governor’s Workforce Board for all the volunteer time and effort they have given toward the betterment of our economy.

Many studies show that you can’t build a good economy without good infrastructure. Rhode Island is the second-most densely populated state and one of the most heavily traveled, all in a coastal salt air environment – and our infrastructure takes a beating. Maintenance of our roads and bridges is critical. Make no mistake: strengthening our infrastructure is an integral part of improving our economic competitiveness.

With this in mind, the budget I submit to you includes a number of strategic infrastructure investments. These have the dual benefit of strengthening our economic climate while putting Rhode Islanders back to work now. I have included a proposal to advance over $11 million in pay-as-you-go funding for already approved projects that can start immediately. This is a smart opportunity to get the trades back to work as soon as possible and improve the condition of our infrastructure.

Being more proactive about routine repairs and maintenance will also help us avoid costly replacement projects in the future. Unfortunately, we have seen a number of these in recent years, including the Sakonnet River Bridge. They have cost the taxpayers significantly and have forced hard decisions to be made. I do not want to have to rebuild another bridge because of lack of proper maintenance. This is not going to happen as long as I am Governor. We must invest in our infrastructure.

I am pleased to note that my Administration has also taken historic steps to reform how we finance our transportation system.

For the first time in memory, this past November voters did not have to approve a bond referendum to support transportation costs. We will no longer borrow to provide our state match for our federal highway dollars. This means that our valuable resources can be put toward important repair and improvement projects – not interest on the debt. Again, this is good fiscal management.

Although we didn’t bond for transportation funds, I am pleased that a number of important bond items were approved by an overwhelming majority of voters this past November. These initiatives will boost our economy by investing in some of Rhode Island’s premier assets, such as our environment, our institutions of higher education, and veterans’ services.

Thank you, Rhode Islanders, for your strong confidence in this Administration’s ability to wisely manage these projects worth over $200 million. Not only will we manage them well, we will get construction workers on the job as soon as possible.

I also want to accelerate the economic activity in Providence’s Knowledge District. To that end, I propose an additional $500,000 to enhance the operations of the 195 Redevelopment Commission. You have heard me talk before about the importance of the medical, research, and education fields – the ‘meds and eds.’ We must continue to focus on these assets to grow our economy and create jobs.

This past year saw another strong tourism season, highlighted by the return of America’s Cup racing to Newport and the Netroots Nation conference in Providence – among others.

To ensure that tourism and hospitality remain a strong sector of our economy and that we continue attracting visitors to Rhode Island, I recommend bolstering the state’s tourism marketing efforts with an additional $600,000.

As a former local official, I have worked in my time as Governor to make property tax relief a key priority of my Administration. I may sound like a broken record at this point, but in the years before I took office, cities and towns bore the brunt of the downturn in state revenues. Those most severely affected were the distressed communities that could least afford it.

I am generally skeptical of the myriad rankings and reports that place Rhode Island at the bottom of the barrel in terms of business climate. Many of them fail to take into account important factors, and many compare apples to oranges.

But here are some facts, from a report that compares apples to apples. The Department of Revenue studied the tax burden on Rhode Island businesses compared to other states.

Rhode Island ranks 26th in the burden of state taxes on businesses. We’re in the middle nationally with our sales and income taxes. In this same study, we rank 41st – near the bottom – in terms of local taxation borne by businesses. That is, the property tax.

While everyone likes to talk about onerous tax rates at the state level, the property tax is the real major barrier to economic growth – particularly on small businesses.

With that in mind, I will continue to work with the cities and towns for property tax relief.

How will we do it? On top of the $41 million in local aid contained in my previous two budgets, this year I recommend an additional $30 million for property tax relief. This is divided between $20 million in additional aid to our cities and towns – with particular attention to distressed communities – and $10 million in RICAP funds for local roads and streetscapes.

To further help our cities and towns, I also propose modifying the historic tax credit program by providing access to abandoned tax credits.

Failure to support these initiatives will only drive Rhode Island further down on the chart that matters most to our economic climate – the burden of local taxes borne by businesses. Our state as a whole cannot be successful without the financial health of our cities and towns. We’re going to continue encouraging local prosperity by supporting our municipalities.

You have heard me talk a lot tonight about Rhode Island’s economy. This is because, with a stronger economy and more Rhode Islanders working, all of our other challenges become more manageable.

But in order to do my job as Governor – for us to do our job as elected officials – we must care for the most vulnerable among us.

Each budget brings with it difficult decisions. That has been the case once again this year, as we worked to close the deficit. But it is my hope, as in years past, that if the May numbers upon which you, the General Assembly, will base your budget, come in stronger than the numbers on which I base mine, you will be able to undo some of these tough choices.

I also anticipate criticism about my decision to lower the corporate tax rate while there is a strain on social services. I would not make this recommendation if I did not truly believe that in the long run it will result in a stronger economy, more Rhode Islanders working, and fewer of our citizens in need of state support.

Our ultimate goal is always to get our people back to work and to give those who rely on social services a hand up, where possible, to financial independence. And again, hopefully May revenue numbers will provide better options.

Throughout my time in public service, whether as Mayor, United States Senator, or Governor, my whole agenda has been based on thinking not only about today, but about the long-term. I am always considering how the decisions we make today will influence Rhode Island years down the road.

We want to have a state where there are jobs and opportunities for our children and their children. They deserve to be able to stay in the state they love – a state with good roads and bridges, high-quality schools, clean water, protected open spaces, and a secure safety net.

Governing a state is not about quick gains that draw headlines. It’s about positioning Rhode Island for lasting success and prosperity.

Everyone likes accountability. And the best way to measure our progress is through tracking certain metrics.

The results indicate that we are moving steadily in the right direction.

Two years ago, when I was sworn in as Governor, Rhode Island was facing a $295 million deficit.

Our unemployment rate was 11.4%.

We had lost 40,000 jobs in the previous four years.

Many cities and towns were on the verge of collapse – most notably Central Falls.

We had sustained years of cuts to higher education and inadequate K-12 funding.

And our state workforce was demoralized.

A gloomy cloud of negativity gathered over our state.

It takes time for the sun to break through, but it is. Two years later, unemployment is heading in the right direction – still unacceptably high, but improving.

We are tackling our deficits.

Central Falls has been called a national model for emerging stronger from Chapter 9.

The Station District in Warwick is ready to realize its potential with the runway expansion and the arrival of JetBlue.

We are investing in our schools and in our students.

Things are getting better, and we must build on this momentum to continue our recovery.

I know that tomorrow the House of Representatives will be holding an economic summit. This follows an ongoing discussion that has occurred over the past year about how best to improve Rhode Island’s economy.

My hope is that you all will be skeptical and wary of deviating from the steady, methodical construction of a Rhode Island economy built for today and for the future. We tried the “get rich quick” approach by giving $75 million to a retired baseball player with zero business experience. We cannot make such panic-driven decisions again.

In addition to offering us an opportunity to look ahead, the State of the State reminds us to reflect and to learn from the year we have just completed.

Perhaps the darkest moment of the past year came just before its end. On December 14, just over one month ago, a troubled young man took the lives of 27 innocent victims – 20 elementary school students, 6 teachers and administrators, and his own mother. This tragedy happened in our neighboring state of Connecticut, in a community similar to so many in Rhode Island. It was the latest in a series of mass shootings that occurred this past year.

We should not need this reminder, but we have been given it. While respecting the rights of hunters and responsible gun owners, we could – and should – do more to prevent senseless acts of violence. That is why, in the current General Assembly session, I will join with the leaders of the House and Senate to craft, introduce, and pass legislation that makes Rhode Island a safer place both for us and our children.

Despite this horrific chapter, 2012 did have its positives. I am grateful that our state did not have the extensive damage and loss of life that Hurricane Sandy brought to other Northeastern states.

I want to thank all those who came together to get Rhode Island through the storm safely. This includes hardworking state and municipal employees, National Grid, the Red Cross and the United Way, and the many volunteers who pitched in to help their fellow Rhode Islanders.

I am also grateful to the Obama Administration for the millions of dollars in federal aid to help us recover, repair, and rebuild.

Looking ahead to our agenda for the year we have just begun, we in this room will have an opportunity to enact historic legislation. In this climate of intense economic competition, as we work to attract the best and brightest, we are currently at an economic disadvantage with our neighbors. For our economic development, for civil rights, and for basic fairness, we must extend the rights and benefits of marriage to all Rhode Islanders.

Let’s come together to pass marriage equality.

Rhode Island has a long legacy of tolerance and diversity. For centuries, new Americans have made this state strong. To uphold this legacy, in the coming weeks I will announce efforts to bring greater diversity to our state workforce.

We will also keep moving forward with the development of the Health Benefits Exchange, which will make healthcare more affordable for individuals and employers. This is an area where I am proud to say that Rhode Island continues to lead the way.

Finally, with so many Rhode Islanders returning home from foreign deployments, we will continue make it a priority to support military service members and their families – both during and after their service.

Mr. Speaker, Madam President, members of the General Assembly – my priorities are reflected in this budget. And your priorities will be demonstrated in the action you take in the coming months. The steps we have taken over the past several years, the changes we have made, are working. Rhode Island is working.

To summarize: in this budget, we are investing in education. We are investing in infrastructure. We are investing in workforce development. We are investing in our cities and towns and property tax relief.

And we’re doing it all without raising taxes or fees of any kind – and while lowering the corporate tax.

My fellow Rhode Islanders, the state of our state is steadily improving. I am eager to join with you to continue moving with purpose and vision toward our shared goal: a brighter future for our great state.

Thank you.

This Just In: Media Can’t Steal From Social Networks


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Bill Rappleye, Stephanie Mandeville DaSilva and Bill Fischer are engrossed in the campaign via their smart phones. (Photo by Bob Plain)

In what Reuters calls “one of the first big tests of intellectual property law involving social media” a judge has ruled that news organizations can’t freely use photos posted to Twitter.

Reuters reports: “Agence France-Presse and The Washington Post infringed on the copyrights of photographer Daniel Morel in using pictures he took in the aftermath of the Haiti earthquake in January 2010, District Judge Alison Nathan in Manhattan ruled. While AFP had argued that once the pictures appeared on Twitter they were freely available, the judge said that Twitter’s terms of service did not give the news agency a license to publish the images without Morel’s permission.”

Coincidentally enough – two local media organizations used photos ostensibly taken from Facebook today: the Providence Journal and RI Future.

We used Jenny Norris’ picture of Linc Chafee, Gina Raimondo, Frank Ferri and Art Handy at the House Judiciary Committee hearing on marriage equality last night. I couldn’t be at the hearing, but I saw Norris’ picture on Facebook and asked her if she would mind if we used it. She agreed and I think it was a pretty good deal all around: we got great art and she got a little notoriety.

As an aside, I think crowd-sourced journalism works well for a progressive news/opinion outlet and I hope we do more of it. To that end, please send your pictures, videos, story ideas, rants and raves to me at editor<at>rifuture<dot>org.

The ProJo, it seems, took a picture from the Facebook profile of an alleged drug and gun dealer whom police arrested recently. In the picture, the man is armed and holding a large amount of cash. Ironically, police became aware of him because of such pictures on Facebook, according to the Journal piece, and first reached out to set him up there.

The story doesn’t explicitly say the picture was lifted from Facebook, but it implies as much: “Except for one. The handle of a revolver is exposed in Main’s waistband, as he shows off money in one hand and a bagged substance in another.”

I don’t point this out to pick on the ProJo. I just thought the timing of it all was coincidental.

Why Wasn’t ‘Django Unchained’ Set In RI?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Soon Black History Month (Feb) will be here, and if the past is truly prologue, we should expect the typical, mediocre and depoliticized historical trivia that gets passed off as “Black History.”

However, I intend to combat this with historical commentary, that occasions a more relevant way in which to engage Africana history, philosophy, and political thought both on the Continent and throughout the Diaspora.

With the release of Django Unchained we see one of the few moments in U.S. cinematographic history where southern plantation slavery is thrust upon the big screen as a context for the material and social violence that is so traditionally American. If the American south is the conventional home of all-things white supremacy, then certainly the American north — particularly Rhode Island — must have been its principal financier.

W. E. B. Du Bois, the venerable American historian, sociologist, Pan-Africanist, and first African American to earn a doctorate from Harvard, chronicled Rhode Island’s centralized position as a primary trader in African people in his doctoral dissertation The Suppression of the African Slave Trade.

Rhode Island became the greatest slave-trader in America. Although she did not import many slaves for her own use, she became the clearing-house for the trade of other colonies.

 

Du Bois would go on to quote Rev. Samuel Hopkins, a theologian who preached at the First Congregational Church in Newport, Rhode Island for over three decades:

The inhabitants of Rhode Island, especially those of Newport, have had by far the greater share in this traffic, of all these United States. This trade in human species has been the first wheel of commerce in Newport, on which every other movement in business has chiefly depended. That town has been built up, and flourished in times past, at the expense of the blood, the liberty, and happiness of the poor Africans; and the inhabitants have lived on this, and by it have gotten most of the their wealth and riches. (1787)

 

Years later scholar Jay Coughtry, in his ground-breaking work on the Rhode Island slave trade, The Notorious Triangle: Rhode Island and the African Slave Trade, 1700-1807, informs us that…

Throughout the eighteenth century, Rhode Island merchants controlled between 60 and 90 percent of the American trade in African slaves. … in no other colony or state did the slave trade play as significant a role in the total economy.

 

I am less interested in film review styled critiques of Tarantino’s movie (which I think people should see). Perhaps it would be more useful to use moments such as his film occasions to break with the ways in which America’s “peculiar institution” — racialized chattel slavery — is re-imagined as a unique and centralized southern phenomena. While singularly viewing slavery in the context of a southern plantation affords ways to understand some of the base physical, social and religious horrors of white supremacy, it elides its fundamental financial elements. Black flesh was transformed into literal commerce, and no one understood this better than Rhode Islanders.

After a brief lull during the Revolutionary War Rhode Island, as a new state, recommenced its trade in humans; and this time one clan would lead the way. Coughtry’s thorough examination of official shipping records from the Works Projects Administration for Bristol, Rhode Island revealed that a single family — the D’Wolfs…

…had the largest interest in the African slave trade of any American family before or after the Revolution…

 

Northerners have historically laid the moral responsibility of this nation’s “original sin” at the feet of wealthy southern political actors. However, the fascinating irony is that Django should have been obliged to seek retribution in locations like Newport and Bristol, rather than Mississippi and Tennessee.

Malcolm X was right. The southern part of the United States begins at the Canadian border.


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387