Police body cameras a priority for Providence mayoral candidates


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

body_cam_top_halfThe People’s Forum, an opportunity for the community most interested in economic and social justice to interview and hold accountable the Providence mayoral candidates, explored some interesting ideas not usually brought up in other forums or debates.

The questionnaires the candidates filled out for the People’s Forum are essentially promises to the community, and as such offer interesting insights into the future of Providence in terms of community safety, violence and economic well being.

One item that frontrunners Jorge Elorza and Buddy Cianci both agreed to concerned the idea of outfitting police officers with video cameras, to be operated under the following guidelines:

The Providence Police Department shall adopt written procedures regarding the use of video and/or audio recording devices such as, but not limited to: dashboard cameras, body cameras, and digital audio recorders. These policies shall be public records and shall include, but not be limited to, the following standards:

a) All stops conducted by police officials with such equipment shall be recorded. The recording shall begin no later than when an officer first signals the vehicle or individual to stop or arrives at the scene of an ongoing stop begun by another law enforcement officer, and the recording shall continue until the stop is completed and the subject departs, or until the officer’s participation in the stop ends.
b) The subject of a stop shall be advised by the officer that the encounter is being recorded.
c) A chain-of-custody record of the recordings shall be maintained.
d) A subject of a stop that was recorded by a video/audio surveillance camera, and/or his or her legal counsel, shall have the right to view and listen to the recording at the police station and to obtain a  copy of the recording involving him or her within ten (10) business days of the request;
e) The policy shall establish a minimum period of retention for such recordings of no less than sixty (60) days, and procedures to ensure that the recording equipment is in proper working order, and shall bar the destruction of any recording related to an incident that is the subject of a pending complaint, misconduct investigation or civil or criminal proceeding. Such recordings shall be retained for a minimum of ten (10) days after the final resolution of such investigation or proceeding, including the time for any appeal;
f) The policy shall explicitly prohibit any violation of these requirements, including any attempts to disengage or tamper with the video/audio surveillance equipment or to otherwise fail to record stops as specified herein;

While on duty and in interaction with the public, police shall be prohibited from using personal audio or video recording devices. Only devices subject to the policy outlined above shall be permitted.

The guidelines above are a good start on the kind of safeguards Providence would have to adopt along with police body cameras. The ACLU has a great breakdown of the various privacy and rights concerns such cameras will inevitably raise, as well as suggestions to help mitigate negative effects.  There is a fair bit of overlap between the ideas suggested by the People’s Forum and the ACLU’s analysis, so developing a smart policy should not be a problem.

Elorza agreed with the need for police to wear cameras, as did Cianci, though Cianci wrote that he sees the cost of buying and maintaining such equipment as requiring “a long term budget that includes projections for buying this type of equipment.” However, given the potential savings in terms of lawsuits and court costs that police body cameras have shown in areas that have tested the concept, there is no question of affordability.

According to German Lopez at Vox:

In New York City, a report from the city’s public advocate found that outfitting the entire police department with body cameras would cost around $33 million. But in 2013, the city paid $152 million as a result of claims of police misconduct. If body cameras could reduce those claims by just one-fifth, the devices would pay for themselves.

Early studies of the effects of police body cameras have been encouraging. In Rialto CA, complaints against officers fell 88% and officer’s use of force dropped 60%.

So it seems that whoever wins the election to become mayor of Providence, police body cameras will become a reality in the next few years.

Welcome to the 21st Century.

VIDEOS: Why would anyone vote for Ernie Almonte for General Treasurer?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

almonte conleyErnie Almonte can’t make up his mind.

Now he’s an “independent” running for general treasurer. But he began the 2014 campaign season as a Democrat running for governor. He was the first to announce, way back in November 2012 right after the last election. He soon realized that there was no way he would win the nomination for governor against Gina Raimondo and Angel Taveras (and later Clay Pell). So he switched to running for the Democratic nomination for general treasurer. But then he pulled the plug on that, too, when he realized he couldn’t beat Seth Magaziner and Frank Caprio.

That’s when he decided instead to go the independent route, though with the informal endorsement from the RI Republican Party.

But Almonte’s biggest problem and the cause of his vacillations is that he can’t keep his own story straight.

He claimed to be a Democrat, but he has repeatedly mouthed Republican positions such as mimicking Mitt Romney’s attack on the “47% of the public” whom Romney – and Almonte – consider to be deadbeats. He attacked Social Security and Medicare and even giving any consideration at all to raising taxes on the rich. It’s all on videotape that is linked here and here.

Almonte’s TV ads tout his credentials as an auditor, which I found to be pretty bold, given that Almonte – as Rhode Island’s Auditor General – failed to sound the alarm about our impending public pension crisis. The first warning from the Auditor General’s office about our pension problems came in the first audit report issued after Almonte resigned. We count on auditors to find problems like the one our pension funds faced, but Almonte blew it but now wants to claim credit for his experience as auditor.

At a recorded forum about a month ago, Almonte appeared on stage with his opponent Democrat Seth Magaziner. Seth very kindly gave Almonte an opportunity to recant, or at least revise, the remarks Almonte had made against the American middle-class, Medicare, Social Security and public pensions.

At first, it seemed as if Almonte was going to recant, saying that the remarks were actually written for him by the US Comptroller General who asked Ernie to take his place at a workshop and deliver the remarks. In an earlier meeting with the political action committee of one of the state’s labor unions, Almonte said that he was paid to make the remarks, as if that made it better.

In today’s video, you can see Almonte explain where the statement came from and see him say to Magaziner that he felt he couldn’t turn down the Comptroller General. Seth’s very droll answer was “I would have said NO.”

Rather than cut his losses, Almonte decided to ditch his good old boy persona to try to take Seth Magaziner to the wood shed. Almonte began lecturing him as if Seth was a school boy – “Listen to what I’m saying so you don’t get it wrong.” And Seth played right along, feeding him straight lines.

Almonte blew it again. He took the position that he doesn’t trust the government to invest people’s money, despite 80 years of successful administration. Seth said that Almonte’s attacks on Social Security were unwarranted, an “over-reaction,” and that “minor tweaks” (such as raising the current cap on the level of income is subject to Social Security – set too low and placing the burden on low-wage workers).

Almonte said that yes, “minor tweaks” could work – such as raising the retirement age. But fundamentally, he does not trust the government, even though he is running for a place in it. He calls this a “courageous conversations.”

Even though Almonte tried to gloss over his earlier remarks, he just couldn’t help himself but take a full header into the swamp. As much as he tried to pass the blame for the anti-Social Security remarks onto the Comptroller General, he ended up embracing privatizing Social Security. Period.

“I don’t trust the government to make the decisions.” Instead, he offered his “vision” of using a “financial literacy program” to teach the elderly how to cope with a new private system where they have to invest the money themselves “so people don’t have to rely on the government.” If that’s not a full-throated call for privatized Social Security, I don’t know what is.

Here’s the new video (you can also click here to see it):

Was Almonte asleep during 2008 – 2009 when those private retirement accounts – 401(k)s and IRAs – crashed and, in many cases, ended up being used to cover mortgage payments?

Actually, Almonte was asleep, because if you look at the reports he issued for the state’s pension funds for those two years (his last before he resigned to run for state office), you’ll see nary a hint of alarm. Click here and here to see what I’m talking about.

But worse than that, it was Almonte’s job in the years leading up to the market crash and Rhode Island’s subsequent pension crisis to point out that the state was failing to make the promised deposits into state workers’ pension funds even though those state workers consistently paid their fair share.

Where was RI Auditor General Almonte while all this happening? Well, then he was part of the government apparatus that he now doesn’t trust. With his record, and his recorded radical views on pensions, Social Security and the middle-class, he wants us to trust him to be General Treasurer?

Providence mayoral candidates agree on almost everything


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

DSC_5399More than 200 people watched as the Providence mayoral candidates took the stage at the Southside Cultural Center on Broad St for The People’s Forum. The candidates were asked about their responses to a questionnaire prepared by various* community groups that addressed three issues of major concern to citizens interested social and economic justice.

The three parts of the questionnaire were:

1. Providence Community Safety Act, an ordinance submitted to the City Council on June 19 that makes our communities safer by protecting civil and human rights and addressing the tension between police and community.

2. Public Money for the Public Good, a policy proposal from community groups and labor unions to make sure that when corporations get tax breaks, workers and the community get concrete benefits like living wage jobs and apprenticeships, money for affordable housing, and accountability.

3. Community Agenda to Address Violence, a comprehensive set of principles and action steps by Concerned Citizens of Providence to address the root causes of violence in our communities by strengthening youth recreation, targeting workforce development initiatives, and improving police-community relations.

DSC_5491The candidates, Democrat Jorge Elorza, Republican Dan Harrop and Independent Buddy Cianci, gave remarkably similar answers to all the questions and largely supported all the suggestions the community groups proposed. Even when the candidates disagreed with the ideas presented by the community, they mostly agreed with each other.

When talking about a living wage, for instance, all three candidates initially opposed the idea, with Elorza saying that raising the minimum wage citywide is impossible under state law, but he would be willing to partner with community leaders to pressure the state to change the statute.

Cianci said that he agrees with Elorza, and thinks a $15 minimum wage is fine, at least for companies that employ more than 3 or 4 people. Harrop rejected the idea of a living wage outright, focusing instead on job creation and tax breaks. This represented the only real policy difference among the three candidates.

Despite being the most controversial figure running for any office in New England, Buddy Cianci got the biggest applause and cheers of the night, just for walking up to the microphone. From my vantage point in the balcony of the theater, it seemed that Cianci supporters were scattered throughout the crowd and ready to rise in applause at a moment’s notice. Whether they were planted there or sincere followers was impossible to tell.

Dan Harrop made the biggest impressions of the night, making the crowd furious by attacking Cianci. “If you want to decrease violence in this city, you cannot have a mayor at City Hall who has a continuous history of violence…” was all Harrop could get out before he was booed and drowned out by the crowd.

Harrop, who is a distant third in the race, has nothing to lose by speaking the truth, and he lately seems to be not so much running for mayor himself as he is working against Cianci. Harrop went so far as to practically endorse Elorza outright, offering to give up 30 seconds of his speaking time so that Elorza might discuss details of his housing plan. When told he could not give up his time, Harrop said that Elorza has a great plan for reclaiming abandoned houses in Providence, one Harrop will steal if elected mayor.

In a race in which the Republican candidate stumps for his Democratic opponent during a campaign event, we’re no longer talking about about issues and ideas. Instead, we’re talking about personalities and public perception, and that gives an advantage to Cianci.

DSC_5492

DSC_5471

*Groups such as: DARE- Direct Action for Rights and Equality, Providence Youth Student Movement Prysm Fam, RI JobswithJustice, Mt. Hope Neighborhood Association (MHNA), Ona Vecinos de Olneyville/Olneyville Neighborhood Association, AFSC Sene American Friends Service Committee, Unite Here Local 217, Comité de Inmigrantes en Acción, Black PAC, and the National Lawyers Guild RI Chapter

Can atheists be trusted in public office?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

TobinBishopThomas“I should emphasize that being an atheist would neither recommend nor disqualify [Jorge Elorza] from being Mayor of Providence,” said Bishop Thomas Tobin in a surprising, recent Facebook post, but before celebrating Tobin’s tolerance and openness, we should read on, “But I wonder if an atheist mayor would be in a position to respect the sincere convictions of believers (of all faiths) and to encourage and support the many contributions the faith community makes in our city and state.”

Thus, Tobin slyly implies that atheists are intolerant.

Put aside, for a moment, the idea that atheists may be more or less intolerant than a conservative, Republican, Catholic Bishop and ponder a moment what Tobin’s words would sound like if he were talking about group of people other than atheists.

“But I wonder if a Jewish mayor would be in a position to respect the sincere convictions of Christians (of all denominations) and to encourage and support the many contributions the Christian community makes in our city and state.”

“But I wonder if an Asian mayor would be in a position to respect the sincere convictions of citizens (of all races) and to encourage and support the many contributions non-Asian communities make in our city and state.”

“But I wonder if a woman mayor would be in a position to respect the sincere convictions of men and to encourage and support the many contributions men make in our city and state.”

“But I wonder if a Catholic mayor would be in a position to respect the sincere convictions of Protestants and to encourage and support the many contributions Protestants make in our city and state.”

A candidate’s religious convictions (or lack thereof) are not relevant to their fitness for office, unless those beliefs run contrary to the Constitution of the United States. Article VI, paragraph 3 of the Constitution reads, “The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.”

If your religious beliefs run counter to the freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution, and you attempt to act on those beliefs in your official capacity as an elected official or judge, then you are unfit for office. Unless one has good reason to suspect that a candidate will not uphold the Constitution, questioning their fitness for office on the basis of religious belief or unbelief is bigotry, pure and simple.

Tobin Elorza

Bill and Hillary love Little Rhody: A history of their trips to RI


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

When former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton campaigns for Democratic candidate for governor Gina Raimondo at an event billed as “Rebuilding the Middle Class” she will be stumping from the same stage she stood on in 2008, when she rallied support for her presidential bid.

When the Clintons comes to the town, Rhode Islanders listen. In the last 23 years the former first couple has made more than a dozen visits to Little Rhody. No doubt that Hillary Clinton will stimulate more support for what could be the first female governor elected in Rhode Island.

Below is just a clip of visits from the last 23 years.

1991 Fundraiser at Providence University Club – Bill Clinton:  When he was still governor of Arkansas, Bill Clinton would attend a fundraiser at the Providence University Club. In attendance, former Providence Mayor Joseph Paolino, and Suzanne Magaziner, mother of the candidate for General Treasurer Seth Magaziner.

Oct 11, 1993: Brown University – Hillary Clinton:  First Lady Hillary Clinton appeared on a televised health care forum at Brown University. As First Lady health care reform was a critical part of her platform.

1994 Blackstone Valley Tourism Council – Bill & Hillary Clinton:  Both former President Bill Clinton and former First Lady Hillary Clinton made a trip to the Blackston Valley Tourism Center to celebrate the 200th anniversary of the founding of Slater Mill. This might be one of the few times the couple traveled to Rhode Island together.

August 1997 – Block Island – Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Chelsea Clinton:  President Clinton arrived at the tiny Block Island airport with his family and Senator Reed to a large group of residents. He told the crowd “…this is the first opportunity I have had to thank the people of Rhode Island for giving the vice president and me the enormous vote of confidence we got here last November. And I’m very grateful to you. Thank you so much.” Shortly after the visit to the home where the family stayed was renamed the “Clinton Cottage.”

1998 North Providence High School – Hillary Clinton:  First Lady Hillary Clinton spoke to an auditorium full of students about the importance of education at North Providence High School. She met then North Providence Mayor Ralph Mollis. As Secretary of State, Mollis endorsed Clinton in 2007. “As a senator from New York, Clinton knows the challenges that northeastern states face. She understands and is ready to address the needs of Rhode Islanders,” he said.

December 14, 1999 – Hillary Clinton: Democratic lawyer Jack McConnell headed a $1,000-a-plate fundraiser at his home for Hillary Clinton’s New York Senate campaign. Friend and Democratic fundraiser Mark Weiner coordinated the pricey event. Jack McConnell went on to become a federal court judge in Rhode Island.

April 8, 2006 – Brown University – Hillary Clinton:  Sen. Hillary Clinton delivered the inaugural address for the Doherty-Granoff Forum on Women Leader at Brown University. Clinton has strong ties to Brown University as a result of her relationship with Ira Magaziner, a former aid the Clinton administration.

June 27 2006 Fundraiser – Bill Clinton: During a fundraiser for Senate candidate Sheldon Whitehouse, former President Clinton report joked that he had been to “Rhode Island so many times he thought he ought to register to vote here.” Tickets for the event, which was healed at the University of Rhode Island, were $1,000 per-person. Sheldon Whitehouse went on to win the Senate seat from then Republican Lincoln Chafee.

Feb 25, 2008 Rhode Island College – Hillary Clinton: On a brisk February morning candidate for President, Hillary Clinton spoke to a packed gym at Rhode Island College. “I’m asking you to consider hiring me for the hardest job in the world,” she said. On stage behind her sat Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, LG. Elizabeth Roberts, Congressman James Langevin, Treasurer Frank Caprio and Secretary of State Ralph Mollis. Clinton went on to win the Rhode Island Democratic primary on March 4th.

2010 – Candidate Rally (Caprio) – Bill Clinton: In 2010, Former President Bill Clinton stumped twice for Democratic Nominee and Candidate for Governor Frank Caprio. The first rally at the Rhode Island Convention Center, Clinton called Caprio a “Realist and a reformer,”a line that would used in a campaign commercial. The second rally, Clinton would tell a crowd of supporters at Veterans Memorial Auditorium: “I love this state, you’ve been good to me, and I’ve tried to be good for you.” Caprio lost his bid for Governor. Weeks after the election headlines revealed that Caprio sneaked his opponents, Ken Block, behind the stage to meet and take photos with the former President.

2014: Candidate Rally (Magaziner) – Bill Clinton Twenty-three years after first coming to Rhode Island, former President Bill Clinton was back to stump for a candidate for treasurer Seth Magaziner. Cheers from the crowd at the Rhode Island Convention Center after Clinton proclaimed “I want to urge you not to be against anybody, but for Seth Magaziner. Seth is the son of former Clinton aid, Ira Magaziner. Magaziner is the V.P. and CEO of one of the Clinton many charitable foundations.

Former ConCon delegates agree: It doesn’t work


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Delegates from the 1986 Constitutional Convention recalled their experiences and urged against convening another convention in 2016 from the steps of Garrahy Judicial Complex where several ConCon meetings were held in the 1980s. The three speakers were united in their opinion that the ConCon is not the tool for tackling issues of governmental reform, and in fact does pose a threat to civil liberties. Further, a new ConCon will almost certainly be captured by special interests, in much the same way the last one was.

Lila SapinsleyLila Sapinsley, former delegate to the 1986 Constitutional Convention and former Senate Republican Minority Leader, said:

“In 1986 when a Constitutional Convention was approved I eagerly ran for delegate. I naively thought that if delegates ran without party labels the convention would be free of politics. However, my hopes were dashed when I saw that since candidates ran from House districts, the convention was a mirror image of the House of Representatives. Delegates, if not directly connected to party leaders, were family or friends. The Speaker of the House controlled the convention. If delegates to the 2015 convention are elected by existing electoral districts we will again have a duplicate of the legislature. Let’s concentrate on electing better representatives and forget about an expensive duplicate of the General Assembly.

Roberto GonzalezEast Providence resident Roberto Gonzalez, also a former delegate, stated:

“The 1986 convention was hijacked from the citizens of Rhode Island. While some delegates deliberated in good faith, the outcome of the convention had been predetermined by the then-powerful House Speaker, who was in turn controlled by the same special interests that have controlled House leaders in recent history. Many, if not most of the delegates, were family or friends of those in power. It was never a convention of the people to improve government, but rather a convention of special interests. I am sure that if the good citizens of this state choose to have another convention, the exact thing will happen. Instead of debating good government amendments, the convention will become bogged down with a plethora of polarizing social issues such as gun control, abortion, voter ID, and immigration. There is nothing to stop the delegates from putting measures on the ballot that will reverse or dilute the civil rights gains that have been so difficult to obtain.”

Tom IzzoTom Izzo, another former delegate, said:

“The process of electing delegates alone impacts the potential for a ‘purer, freer and more open deliberation’ – a process where, while non-partisan, does not allow for a real vetting of the candidates’ qualifications. In most instances–though not running–sitting representatives hold inordinate sway, and special interests can leverage their greatest influence. These special elections, as in most primaries, have a very low voter turnout, and candidates must depend on these special interests to get elected. While there were a few positive outcomes from the last convention, I do not believe the time, the financial cost, the potential negative impact on civil rights, and most importantly the virtually unlimited impact of special interests, especially in light of recent rulings regarding campaign spending, warrants or justifies the calling of another convention.

There is no reason to think that a Constitutional Convention held today will be any different from the 1986 experience, and a number of reasons to think that the results of a new convention will be worse. Since 1986, the influence of money on politics has exploded. The present Speaker of the House is no less powerful than his 1986 predecessor, and is potentially more powerful. No changes have been made to the selection process of delegates that might prevent a convention from being hijacked again.

Promises from proponents that this Constitutional Convention will be different are meaningless. They have no more control over the proceedings and outcomes of a ConCon than I do. Across the country, no state has held a ConCon since the one held in Rhode Island in 1986, for all the reasons the former delegates outlined above.

Why should Rhode Island be the only state not to learn from its mistake?

Gov. Chafee supports Newport casino question


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Governor Linc Chafee supports table games at a casino in Newport, he said Tuesday while in the City-by-the-Sea.

But the law that put the question on this year’s ballot violates Rhode Island’s Constitution by granting regulatory power to the General Assembly, .

“…the Act contains an unconstitutional intrusion into the power of the executive to which I must object,” . “Requiring the Division of Lotteries to obtain regulation approval from a committee made up entirely of legislators is a violation of the separation of powers doctrine.”

The intrusion, said Chafee’s legal counsel Claire Richards, amounts to one sentence on page 13 of a 17 page bill. Here’s the bill and here’s the offending sentence:

“The amended master contract shall also provide that, following completion of the investment requirement, NGJA or its successor shall maintain Newport Grand in a first class manner pursuant to regulations adopted by the division and approved by the permanent joint committee on state lottery.”

Richards said she’s confident the legislature will remove the offending language next session. “We have plenty of time to fix this. If not the next governor will have to decide if they think that section is void. We would give it no legal weight. In other words, we would not do it.”

No comment from House and Senate spokesmen.

But John Marion, of Common Cause RI, agrees it’s a separation of powers problem.

“The casino legislation clearly violates the Separation of Powers that we fought so hard to put into the Rhode Island Constitution,” he said in an email. “The legislature clearly does not accept the new order ten years after voters amended the Constitution. On top of violating SOP the legislation creates a rather contorted referendum process that has been the subject of a lawsuit. It is too bad that Governor Chafee didn’t see fit to veto the defective legislation.”

Buddy Cianci’s Providence: better for whom?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

cianci for whomCianci’s record from the 1990s raises many questions about for whom the city was better for when he was mayor.

“Every few years,” Ian Donnis wrote in the Providence Phoenix at the time, “an incident involving Providence police has provoked outrage and prompted calls for a greater degree of public accountability. In 1992, it was the police beating of a student at Mount Pleasant High School. In 1995, a controversy erupted after an officer was videotaped kicking a man [Corey West] on the ground outside the former Strand club on Washington Street.”

Cianci criticized the violence in both instances. However, the follow-up raises eyebrows.

In the 1995 case, the rookie officer involved kept his position following protests from the union. The chief involved, who faced heavy criticism from the union for moving too quickly to suspend the officer, resigned shortly after. Despite positive words, little was done to change the culture or procedures of the force.

A 1998 Human Rights Watch report reviewed complaints of police abuse in Providence, noting, “During a ride-along with a Providence police sergeant, he … repeatedly mentioned that officers only fear a federal inquiry, not investigations by IAB [Internal Affairs].”

In 2000, community protests and organizing followed the shooting death of Sgt Cornel Young,Jr, a black Providence police officer who was shot dead by two white colleagues who thought he was a suspect and a threat, not a fellow officer off duty trying to help at the scene of a crime.

Ten years ago, Marion Davis wrote a piece in the Phoenix, “Did Cornel Young die in vain?” examining the Providence police early in Cicilline’s first term. Many neighborhood leaders saw halting changes, some saw no difference (as was sadly echoed in this police- run drug ring found during Cicilline’s last term), but some experienced a culture shift.  As Jose Brito, a Southside business owner, saw it:

“We’re not afraid to talk to the police now…we don’t feel they’re the kind of people we have to hate anymore — and believe me, we used to hate them…Now they talk to us as humans, even they have coffee with us, and they’re willing to sit down and spend time talking, and we can tell them complaints that we have. That’s important. Things change when you listen to somebody.”

Times change. Under Taveras, Providence won a regional award for its Community Policing practices, and just graduated its most diverse new officer class ever (even as two new rookies will potentially be  dismissed for larceny). That in itself is a change- now, a rookie involved with theft is dismissed. Under Cianci, a rookie involved with beating a member of the public stayed on the force.

The methods and leadership of the police department now, under Taveras, are better than Cianci’s last term in office, when their were more officers, a better job market, and more homicides.

Cianci tells a great story- but who was his Providence really better for?

RI Progressive Dems don’t endorse Raimondo


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

chafee raimondoAfter endorsing Clay Pell in the primary, the Rhode Island Progressive Democrats decided not to endorse a gubernatorial candidate in the general election.

“While our concerns with (Republican Allan) Fung are far more severe,” according to a press release from RIPDA, “we see (Democrat Gina) Raimondo as a Wall Street Democrat with unacceptably conservative positions on economic issues.”

Sam Bell, director of RIPDA, said those positions include Raimondo not supporting repealing tax cuts to the rich and pension reform. He also found fault with Raimondo’s plan to fund new school construction by diverting sales tax revenue rather than bonding and her manufacturing plan, which he said will “allow corporations to control curriculum at CCRI.”

The left-leaning group only endorsed two candidates, both Democrats, in the general election: Nellie Gorbea, who is running for secretary of state against Republican John Carlevale, and Seth Magaziner, who is running for general treasurer against independent Ernie Almonte.

In their press release, RIPDA had more to say about whom they didn’t support, than who they did. decided not to endorse in the lt. governor’s race and the attorney general’s race.

For Attorney General, progressives face a difficult choice. We cannot endorse either candidate. Peter Kilmartin has a weak record on core civil liberties issues like racial profiling and consumer protection, and Dawson Hodgson is more liberal on issues of individual rights. As a moderate, pro-choice Republican with a voting record well to the left of the median state Senator, Hodgson is the sort of Republican that liberals can find appealing. However, Hodgson has expressed troubling views on guns, workers’ rights, and economic policy. We also have concerns with Kilmartin’s record on access to public records and open government.

Having served as a top lieutenant to former House Speaker Bill Murphy, Kilmartin has close personal and political ties to the conservative machine politicians who run our state so poorly. Hodgson, however, holds no love for Rhode Island’s right-wing Democratic establishment. Given the Attorney General’s ability to prosecute corruption, this is a vital concern.

And here’s what RIPDA said about the lt. governor’s race.

In the Lieutenant Governor’s race, we have also opted not to endorse. While Catherine Taylor is a moderate Republican, we believe she is superior to the Democratic nominee, Dan McKee. Although we certainly cannot endorse her, we do believe that Catherine is the better choice for progressives, despite her party affiliation.

Conservatives from both parties scramble NK political alliances


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

casimiro costa2Rep. Doreen Costa is too conservative for North Kingstown Town Council President Liz Dolan, a Republican who endorsed Democrat Julie Casimiro for the House District 31 seat.

But Costa’s conservative credentials didn’t stop the local fire fighters’ union from throwing their support behind the tea party right-winger who sponsored a right-to-work bill in the state legislature.

“We haven’t had that conversation yet,” said Ray Furtado, president of IAFF 1651, which represents NK fire fighters, when I asked him about Costa’s support for right-to-work legislation. “We looked at who has been in our corner.”

That’s not how Dolan decided who to support.

The town council and fire fighters are mired in a bitter legal battle over staffing issues, and both House candidates have been advocating that the council drop its lawsuit. Furtado said “in no way, shape or form is this negative about Casimiro” noting they decided to endorse Costa before Casimiro decided to run.

Dolan said she broke ranks and backed a Democrat because “I have not been impressed with Doreen’s record.”

She said Costa’s allegiance to the NRA, her role in the Exeter recall election and her hyper-concern over holiday decorations have made her ineffective at representing the district. “We need to bring this party back to where it is more moderate,” Dolan said.

Costa accused Dolan of lying saying, “I had nothing to do with that Exeter recall.”

She also portrayed herself as a moderate. “People have me as this extremist and I find that very offensive,” she said. “I’m not as to the right as people think I am.”

At least not two weeks away from a general election, she’s not.

When asked why she sponsored a right-to-work bill, Costa said, “I did it because I was asked to do it.” At first she said she didn’t recall who asked her to sponsor this bill, and then she remembered, she said, that it was two union teachers whose names she did not know.

“It’s not something I would ever revisit,” Costa said about right-to-work legislation. “Not right now anyway.”

About her bill to drug test people who benefit from certain public subsidies, Costa said, “I still think it’s a good idea but I am not going to put it in again.”

She is still undecided about payday loan reform and raising the minimum wage, but she walked back her vote against same sex marriage. “If I had that to do over again, I would probably vote yes on marriage equality,” she said.

On guns, though, Costa said she’s as conservative as ever. “I will not change my mind on gun legislation.”

Casimiro chalked up Costa’s tack to the center as typical election-year politics. “I think Doreen is running scared right now,” she said.

But Casimiro also has a reputation for being a conservative – a conservative Democrat. “I am fiscally conservative,” she said.

She said she’s also pro-choice, pro-marriage equality and will support working class legislation. “I would absolutely raise the minimum wage,” Casimiro said. “It’s not a living wage.”

Casimiro is a board member of two charter schools in Rhode Island: Blakcstone Valley Prep in Cumberland and Southside Elementary in Providence. “It doesn’t make me anti-labor,” she said. “It means I’m pro-kid.” She added that she “works in some of the worst performing schools in the state” through her work with Family Services of Rhode Island.

Her husband is a Republican and she says she donated to Allan Fung’s first campaign for mayor of Cranston when they worked together at MetLife. This year Casimiro is voting for Gina Raimondo, whom she said she has been campaigning with. “I’m on Team Raimondo.”

Why the left should embrace a ConCon


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
ri constitutionSome progressive groups and labor unions are actively opposing holding a constitutional convention. Indeed, I just got a letter for the head of the RI Federation of Teachers to that effect. It seems there was no rank and file input into that decision. Similarly as a member I had no input into the ACLU decision to oppose.
This is a disappointment, as Rhode Island is not doing that well, especially for working people, and much of the public is cynical about government, disengaged from civic activity and the political process. This is not in our interest as ultimately we need a more positive attitude to get the public support needed for government programs.
A constitutional convention can address this by reforms getting at the who-you-know insider system, Assembly procedures allowing midnight sessions with rules suspended, judicial selection abuse, 38 Studios type end runs around voters, fair redistricting, campaign finance, ethical requirements on legislators. It can build democracy, especially if voter initiative is approved, as it almost was the last time. The RI Sierra Club chapter had supported VI because of our experience elsewhere where it was used to pass environmental legislation, including CA coastal protection that real estate interests had blocked in their Assembly, and “bottle bills” blocked here by the throwaway industries. Indeed much of the energy these day on voter initiative is in the progressive direction, raising minimum wages, paid sick days, labeling GMO food, repealing anti-labor laws, expanding a bottle bill, but many of our progressives seem not to have caught up with that.
Civil rights is a legit concern, but I see little threat voters will restrict the rights of minorities in RI. MA is similar to RI but though they have voter initiative, this has not been a problem. Indeed a constitutional convention or VI could EXPAND rights such as the right to privacy, rights of the terminally ill, rights of children to an adequate education (recently ruled not now a constitutional right,) the right to vote, maybe even improved rights to shoreline access.
As for reproductive freedom, it is a big factor in my support for a con-con in hopes of getting Voter Initiative which of course the Assembly would never voluntarily give up any power and allow. Think ahead. If the GOP wins the next election, a shift of 1 US Supreme Court justice could overturn Roe v Wade, not an unlikely prospect. What are our prospects in the Assembly then, especially with Mattiello and Paiva-Weed in charge? Very low. Pro-choice people would be much better off with the voters, but without VI we’d have no recourse.
I think it would damage the union movement and the progressive community if they are seen as being afraid of the people voting, especially as Rhode Island voters consistently support infrastructure, transit, and public higher education investments, facilities for veterans and the disabled, and environmental protection, even voting pro-choice when that was once on the ballot. We have a small progressive group, Just Reform RI, that is advocating for the constitutional convention, we are developing a website www.justreformri.org and a “civil rights pledge” asking candidates for any convention to sign pledging not to reduce the civil rights of anyone. Please consider meeting with us as appropriate. Lets give democracy a chance!
Barry Schiller

Should Buddy Cianci pick Providence’s next police chief?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

cianci_policechief2Cianci was elected three times in the 1990s – why did he wait until 2001, while under federal investigation, to appoint a chief committed to the idea of community policing?

Richard Sullivan, who served as interim chief from 2001-2002, was introduced to the public by Cianci as “Mr. Accountable.” Urbano Prignano, full chief from 1995-2001, was introduced as “a cop’s cop.” Should there be any difference?

Sullivan made the rounds at neighborhood meetings, and two months into the job the interim chief called a summit with community activists. In the short run, the interim chief closed the community policing unit, but did so to revamp community-focused procedures department wide, echoing successful approaches from Boston. Why didn’t Cianci ever ask his previous chiefs to do so?

Under Sullivan, and, indirectly via the pressure from community groups and federal investigation, no longer were Providence cops required to hold onto their weapons at all hours, which some argued contributed to Sgt.Cornel Young Jr’s death. No longer were people paying for promotions or was the chief passing along answers for the police exam. If Cianci was so effective and forward thinking, couldn’t he have put pressure on the department to clean up in 1995? 1996?  1998? 1999? 2000?

Yet, even with true and healthy progress, Sullivan was opposed to efforts to establish the Providence External Review Authority, a civilian panel to look at police abuse complaints. Under his short tenure, the department faced a lawsuit from the ACLU and Attorney General (now US Senator) Sheldon Whitehouse for “failing to comply with a state-mandated racial profiling study.” In a separate incident, Sher Singh, a software engineer who is also a Sikh, was arrested by Providence police shortly after the horrific 9/11 attacks when his Amtrak train arrived in Providence, based on a tip that four suspicious individuals were on the train. Reportedly, one officer taunted, “How’s Osama bin Laden?” After protests from the community and Attorney General Sheldon Whitehouse’s office, Mayor Cianci agreed to have the Providence police drop charges for carrying “a concealed weapon”, a ceremonial dagger worn by Sikhs.

Before his last minute conversion to accountability, Cianci presided over years of policing policies that alienated city residents. Police Chief Bernard Gannon (1991-1995), who spoke out against a videotaped incident of police abuse in 1995 before leaving the city, was sued to release records of the department’s police complaint records. Police Chief Prignano (1995-2001) was sued for policy entrapping and arresting gay men on Empire St, including LGBT rights activist Rodney Davis – in the late 1990s!

Cianci offers happy words (opposing abuse, celebrating equality), but, especially around community policing, he delivered when it was convenient for him, not for the people in the city.

The People’s Forum: a mayoral debate for the people of PVD


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

PeoplesForum2

More than a dozen community-based organizations, along with advocates, activists, organizers, students and community leaders are collaborating to ask the mayoral candidates tough questions about the solutions these groups have proposed to fix the most serious problems that plague our city. Too often, politicians continue to express support for the same tired policies that are responsible for expanding the equity divide in our city in the first place. We believe that the people who are facing the problems are the experts on those problems and have common sense solutions. Our politicians should embrace these solutions and you (the public) need to know whether they support these solutions or not.

Each candidate has received a week in advance a detailed questionnaire covering three proposals: the Community Agenda to Address Violence, Public Money for the Public Good, and the Community Safety Act. The candidates have been requested to provide clear “Yes” or “No” responses to each section of the proposal. If they do not provide answers before the forum, their speaking time will be dedicated to getting clear responses.

Community Agenda to Address Violence

Following a five-person shooting in the Chad Brown section of Providence, and in response to a call to action by the Providence branch of the NAACP, a number of concerned community members have been meeting to develop a strategy to effectively address these issues within the Providence and Rhode Island community.  The ultimate fruit of these efforts has been the development of a Community Agenda to Address Violence to serve as a roadmap for success.

Candidates will be asked about their support of each section of the Community Agenda to Address Violence.

Public Money for the Public Good / Public Resources, Our Vision (PROV)

Rhode Island Jobs With Justice has convened a coalition of community organizations, building trades unions, environmental groups, and service sector unions, to develop and call for a uniform set of standards companies receiving public subsidies and operating in the city of Providence have to abide by. We believe that public money should be used to further the public good. During campaign season, we hear a lot of promises of jobs, and development projects that will be good for the city. We want to know where the candidates stand on a list of benefits we see as essential in order to ensure these development projects actually do provide tangible benefits for our communities.

Candidates will be asked about their support of each community benefit proposed of all companies receiving tax subsidies in the city of Providence.

Community Safety Act

The Community Safety Act takes its name from the urgent need to make our communities safer – for our children, our extended families, and our neighbors.  The clear reasonable guidelines for police community interactions that this ordinance includes are basic first steps to reducing anger at police misconduct, increasing trust and communication, and most importantly – shifting the focus from criminalizing people of color, to addressing the root causes that perpetuate violence in our communities.  The Community Safety Act addresses critical areas, including several in which the Providence Police have no existing policies to guide them.  The Act was introduced in the City Council on June 19, 2014 after nearly two years of community-based planning including house meetings, workshops, and a youth forum.

Candidates will be asked about their support of each section of the Community Safety Act.

JOIN US!

Sponsored by: Providence Youth Student Movement (PrYSM), Direct Action for Rights and Equality (DARE), RI Jobs with Justice (JwJ), the Mount Hope Neighborhood Association (MHNA), Olneyville Neighborhood Association (ONA), American Friends Service Committee SENE, Unite Here Local 217, Comité de Inmigrantes en Acción, Black PAC, National Lawyers Guild RI Chapter, Urban League of RI, Rhode Island Young Professionals, Cambodian Society of RI, Southside Cultural Center, Sheila Wilhelm, Eugene Monteiro, Carolyn Thomas-Davis, Keith Catone, Julius Williams. & others.

PeoplesForum

NBC 10 SoS Debate: Gorbea, Carlevale, voter ID, Con-Con


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

wingmen2First Secretary of State hopefuls Democrat Nellie Gorbea and Republican John Carlevale, who this time is running as a Republican, debated on NBC 10 News Conference.

Then Rob Paquin, self described “second in command of the super minority party” in Rhode Island fills in for Justin Katz on Wingmen and we talk about the issues that contrast the two candidates: voter ID and a constitutional convention.

News, Weather and Classifieds for Southern New England

You can watch Gorbea and Carlevale debate here:News, Weather and Classifieds for Southern New England

North Kingstown is the center of RI political universe


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

candidate_mapNorth Kingstown is the center of Rhode Island’s political universe. Or, at the very least, by far the highest number of statewide candidates hail from this suburban town of 26,000 in the West Bay.

Five of the 15 candidates seeking a statewide office this year live in North Kingstown, as do two of the six candidates running for congress. Providence has three residents running for a statewide seat and one seeking reelection to congress. Warwick has a resident running for governor and congress.  Jamestown, Newport, Warwick, Barrington, Cranston, Cumberland, West Greenwich, Pawtucket and Scituate each have a resident on this year’s ballot.

The five candidates from North Kingstown, including the office they seek and their party affiliation, are:

  • Nellie Gorbea, secretary of state, Democrat
  • Dawson Hodgson, attorney general, Republican
  • Kate Fletcher, governor, unaffiliated
  • Bill Gilbert, lt governor, Moderate
  • Tony Jones, lt governor, unaffiliated

North Kingstown has candidates from all three recognized political parties, with one candidate from each. There are two unaffiliated candidates from North Kingstown and the treasurer’s race is the only statewide contest not to include a North Kingstown resident. Two of the four candidates for lt. governor are from North Kingstown.

But that’s not to be confused with a 50 percent chance that the next lt. governor will be from North Kingstown. According to the latest WPRI/ProJo poll, only one North Kingstown resident is a favorite to win: Gorbea has a 41 percent to 27 percent advantage over her West Greenwich rival John Carlevale. Hodgson was the only other NK resident to win double digit support in the poll, trailing incumbent Peter Kilmartin 46 percent to 32 percent.

Similarly, 33 percent of the candidates in the three congressional races this year are from North Kingstown, or two of the six. Republicans Mark Zaccaria and Rhue Reis, both from NK, are running against incumbents from Jamestown and Warwick in Senator Jack Reed and Congressman Jim Langevin. Congressman David Cicilline is from Providence and Cormack Lynch is from Newport.

More murders in PVD when Buddy Cianci was mayor


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

cianci_murder rateForget the razzle-dazzle of Buddy Cianci incanting the good old days and the paranoia around Achievement First. Consider the character of the man – read Emma Sloan’s harrowing piece – and look at Cianci’s most recent term in office (1999-2002). His record simply doesn’t justify another term.

Despite a larger police force, the capital city had more murders during Buddy Cianci’s last four years in office than the most recent four under Taveras.

From 1999 to 2002, the statistics are stark: 26 murders in 1999, 30 in 2000, 23 in 2001, 23 in 2002. During his 1995-1998 term the numbers of annual murders ranged from 25 to 12. There were 22 murders in 1993 and 21 in 1994.

From 2011 to now, under Mayor Taveras, the homicide rate has varied from 12 in 2011, 17 in 2012, to 14 in 2013. There have been 13 murders this year.

Think about this -even though jobless rates are worse in the city now, even with a smaller force, more transparent, honest police leadership and partnerships have kept murders down. 

According to the San Diego Reporter, just prior to his last term, upon arriving on the scene after a 1998 double-homicide, potentially tied to drug trafficking, Cianci remarked, “Seen one you’ve seen them all.”

Can you imagine Angel Taveras saying that upon arriving at a homicide scene?

Former US Attorneys united: Say ‘no’ to Buddy


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
DSC_5323
Corrente and Whitehouse

In what one attendee called an “unprecedented” press conference, three former US Attorneys and one expert in governmental ethics held a press conference today to educate the public about the rampant criminality of Buddy Cianci’s two previous turns as Mayor of Providence, with an eye towards preventing a third. Republicans Robert Corrente and Lincoln Almond (who also served as governor of Rhode Island) alongside Democrat and current United States Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, were united in their opinion that a third Cianci administration is, in the words of Corrente, an “alarming prospect.”

Corrente started the press conference by noting that the information being presented was for the undecided voters who will determine the mayoral race in Providence, not for those who have already decided. Cianci, says Corrente, has “minimized and even joked about the crimes he committed in office,” and these crimes include a “violent beating involving a fireplace log and an ashtray.” The head of the Providence City Council during Cianci’s first term told Corrente that, “Cianci is killing the city” through threats, bribery and extortion.

During his second administration, said Corrente, Cianci ran the Providence City Hall as an organized criminal enterprise for nearly a decade before being convicted on RICO charges, yet the former mayor characterized his conviction as “some guy down the hall who took a g-note.” Corrente called Cianci’s statement an “outrageous mischaracterization.”

Lincoln Almond, who joined the press conference by telephone, added, “You don’t get five years for a technical violation.”

Certainly Cianci has served his time for his crimes, but rehabilitation means taking responsibility for and owning up to your misdeeds. Cianci has shown no remorse, said Corrente, and there is every reason to believe that a third term will be exactly like the first two.

Senator Whitehouse concurred, adding that, “one should not believe that this type of criminal activity is harmless to taxpayers.” When the cost of doing business in Providence includes bribery and extortion, business stays away, says Whitehouse, noting that there was a “surge of [business] activity” after Cianci’s tenure as mayor, when business at City Hall could be conducted honestly.

Almond added, “The fiscal problems facing Providence [today] were created during the Cianci administration.”

Phil West, who formerly headed up Common Cause, says that, “the only way [Cianci] can run a city is pay-to-play.” Voters have to ask themselves, “Has Buddy Cianci’s character changed?”

“I find that hard to believe,” said West.

When asked why, despite his criminal record, Cianci is leading in the polls, the three US Attorneys seemed at a loss. Corrente suggested that there may be many who don’t remember the extent of Cianci’s crimes or who moved into the city after the fact. Whitehouse suggested that the public is confusing Cianci’s “entertainment value” for responsible leadership. It was also suggested that many have publicly supported Cianci do so because they are afraid of political retribution should he win.

I think Corrente got closer to the truth when he admitted that many, like the firefighter, police, teacher and taxicab unions, are simply voting in their own economic interest by supporting Cianci. I would add that in my talks with likely voters, many feel that the major party candidates, the Republican Harrop and the Democrat Elorza, do not have the interests of working people and the working poor at heart. The concerns of working people are not being addressed by the major party candidates, forcing voters to consider casting their ballots for a criminal who might help them over “honest” politicians who have flatly declared themselves opposed to their interests.

More and more Rhode Islanders are falling into poverty, and our major candidates for office offer little, save for the promise of making Rhode Island more business friendly in the hope of attracting more low paying jobs at poverty wages. In this light a voter’s ballot is not cast for Cianci, but against a system that doesn’t work for them.

As sympathetic as I am to this logic, voting for Cianci is a mistake. Cianci’s life of criminality and abuse of power is a stain on Providence, and I dare anyone to read Emma Sloan’s piece, “Why one rape victim won’t support Cianci” and still publicly support the man. At a certain point, it’s not about the character of the candidate, but the character of the voter.

Providence adds 53 new officers, here’s what the community said to them


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Law Enforcement Community Forum 01It can’t be easy to be a new police officer in the racially and politically charged post-Ferguson era, but yesterday 53 graduates of the Providence Police Training Academy begin their careers.

These young men and women will determine the future of the Providence Police Department for the next 20 or 30 years, so it is very important they get the training right. We need a police department that respects and responds to the community. Last Tuesday night, at the South Providence Boys and Girls Club, the graduates had the opportunity to meet members of the community they will be serving for the first time.

“The community needs law enforcement and law enforcement needs community,” said Providence Police Colonel Hugh Clements, to the 60 or so people who attended the event. “The culture of law enforcement has to change.”

Law Enforcement Community Forum 02Kobi Dennis, organizer and “community guy” introduced the new police officers. “You are going to be on the street soon,” Dennis told the new recruits, then gesturing to the crowd behind him, added, “and these are the people you are going to be seeing.”

Dennis wanted to keep the interaction between police and community positive and avoid turning the event into a series of complaints about the police. After all, these are new recruits, with unblemished records. In many ways this is more than an introduction to the community, this is a fresh start for the Providence Police Department.

But this was a chance for many citizens to explain to the new recruits their perception of the police, which isn’t always positive. For instance, a Latino teenager talked about being harassed by the police simply because of the way he was dressed. Harassment, disrespect and being the object of suspicion simply for being African American or Latino was a recurring theme from the public.

“My daughter is 18,” said an older African American man, “When she’s walking, she doesn’t want to be out with her brothers because they always get harassed [by the police]. Her brothers are supposed to protect her, but she doesn’t want to be out with them.”

A mother stood and talked about watching the police interact with teenagers hanging out in the park across the street from her home. The teenagers in the park are often stopped by the police and instructed to sit on the ground as they are questioned and their backpacks searched.

“What good are our rights if you are violating them?” asked the mother. “Our kids feel the way they do [about the police] because they feel disrespected. They don’t trust you. I’m a black woman. I’ve been pulled over six times in my life for no reason.”

Colonel Clements understood the community’s reaction, and explained that though police officers often have information that leads them to make searches that may seem unwarranted, that doesn’t mean the officers need to be disrespectful while performing their duties. The officers, said Clements, “need to be able to articulate why they are doing what they are doing.”

“I would expect, at least, that you might say, ‘Have a nice day,” added Dennis, to some laughter.

Young people of color are disproportionately more likely to be victims of gun violence in Providence. A woman spoke movingly of losing a teen she was mentoring to a bullet. She told the new officers, “Our kids get shot, yours don’t.”

This is the barrier that separates community and police into us and them. One optimistic young recruit said that he sees his job, in part, as helping to “break down the wall between police and community.” Another new officer added, “We are taught to use our presence and our voice to de-escalate situations.”

A female social worker from the community had some insight on how to get break down the walls that separate police from community. “Be role models and mentors,” she said, “Attend neighborhood events and introduce yourself. Examine the reasons you want to be a cop. If you don’t want to contribute to the wellbeing of our neighborhoods, please step down.”

In addition to questions and dialog around the issue of racial profiling and community engagement, there were some comments of a positive note. “I see a lot of individuals of color [among the recruits] and that’s a good thing,” said one woman from the audience, “Do not forget where you came from.”

To the women among the new officers another audience member said, “Our girls really need to see you in leadership roles.”

In the end this was a positive interaction. There was a lot of optimism from the community and from the new recruits. “I joined because of a positive experience with a police officer in my youth,” said one young officer.

Let’s hope that through respectful, dignified community engagement these new officers can create many more positive experiences for our communities.

Why one rape victim won’t support Cianci


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

I was raped when I was 18. We were kissing, and he asked me to take off my pants. I told him I didn’t want to have sex. He assured me he only wanted to touch me with his hands. But once I took them off, he forced his penis inside me, and restrained me when I tried to push him away.

A woman named Ruth Bandlow tells a similar story of a night in 1966.

cianci2She was walking home when a car pulled up. The man inside was Vincent A. “Buddy” Cianci, Jr.

According to her story, he said he knew a friend of hers. Wouldn’t she come home and have a drink with him?

Both parties agree that Bandlow accompanied Cianci home that night. In a New York Times interview, Cianci called the encounter a “togetherness, a one-night stand kind of thing.”

Bandlow’s version, as recounted in this court filing and Mike Stanton’s book “Prince of Providence”, goes a little differently:

When they arrived he offered her a drink—a rum and coke. It quickly made her feel ill. She recalls deflecting his attempts to kiss her and blacking out. When she awoke, he was on top of her. He held a gun to her head and told her not to scream or struggle.

“Look out the window—there’s a ravine there,” Cianci said to Bandlow, according to Stanton’s book. “I could throw your body down there, and no one would ever find you.” After that, she stopped struggling and he raped her.

The court document reveals that when police searched Cianci’s house, they recovered sheets with blood on them and the pistol Bandlow described. Both Bandlow and Cianci agreed to take a lie-detector test. Bandlow passed hers. Cianci failed three times.

The investigators were convinced. It was “one of the most clear cut cases of rape he had ever processed,” said Joe Wilamovsky, an expert working on the forensic investigation of the case, according to the court filing. Stanton quotes Harold Block, the primary officer on the case: “We thought we had everything….We thought we had enough to convict him.”

But Cianci was never charged. Bandlow withdrew her complaint and in quick succession money changed hands. They both admitted this in court documents– $3,000 according to Bandlow. The public never knew of the rape case until July, 1978, while he was in the midst of a campaign for reelection as mayor of Providence. The publication New Times released a detailed and damning article about the case. According to a UPI article from July 10, 1978, Cianci called it “character assassination” and filed a libel suit. He still won the election.

Since then he has been asked about his story many times and discrepancies occasionally appear. During discovery for his suit, when Cianci was asked about the three failed polygraphs described in the police report, he said he only took one and was never told the results. In later testimony for the suit, he said the technician had told him he had nothing to worry about. The story changed again in June, 2013, when he told the New York Times, “I never took three lie-detector tests. I never took any lie-detector test.” But that is not what’s reported in a short article in the Milwaukee Sentinel from March 5, 1966, which says both parties agreed to take a polygraph, according to what Stanton wrote in his book.

There are other unnerving stories in Cianci’s public history when it comes to his treatment of women.

Sheila Cianci, his ex-wife, told her friend Raymond DeLeo about incidents from her marriage. An excerpt from Stanton’s book in the Providence Journal says, she said she was afraid to file for divorce due to his frequent threats: She recalls one instance when he threatened to throw her over the second-floor banister. And she may have had reason to believe he was serious: DeLeo testified under oath that Mrs. Cianci said her husband had once tried to strangle her. If what Mrs. Cianci recounts is true, she was facing severe emotional and physical abuse. She also said she had had to secretly take money from his jacket pockets because he was restricting her access to funds, a form of control known as financial abuse.

Wendy Materna, another long-term partner of Cianci’s, told Stanton she “suffered his verbal abuse.” He was frequently unfaithful to her, she says, and notes that when she went out, she was never alone: “Buddy’s baby-sitters” were everywhere she went. When she decided to leave Cianci, she explained to her mother that he’d “been making [her] cry for nine years.” His reaction, she says, was to threaten her new boyfriend. Stanton writes that he “threatened to plant drugs on her boyfriend and tip off the police … she had heard Cianci say the same thing many times before about political rivals or anyone else who angered him.”

Cianci also tapped her phone, sent his associates to warn her to “behave,” and made repeated appeals to her mother, according to Stanton. Cianci and Materna fell out of touch for a long time, but they have now reconciled. When a Boston Magazine reporter asked her why, her words were not of love or forgiveness; she simply said, “He was the devil I knew.”

According to a Centers for Disease Control report from last month, as many as two thirds of American women have experienced sexual violence and according to the Rape and Incest National Network, only 3 out of 100 perpetrators of sexual violence spend even one night incarcerated. Part of the reason for these statistics is because many victims—perhaps as many as 60%–never bring their assaults to the authorities out of fear or shame. But the real problem is that no one believes them. Even when a rape is reported, according to RAINN, there’s a 75% chance that the rapist won’t be arrested. On our hands we have a national pandemic of the sickest form of violence a human can perpetrate.

And Providence is no exception. A representative of Day One, the only organization in Rhode Island that deals with sexual violence in the community, told me that overall in Rhode Island the climate is improving and people are becoming more aware of the problem. But that awareness is tenuous and needs to be nurtured, and it especially needs a helping hand in Providence: While the Day One representative was able to name a number of initiatives on the state level to improve awareness of and response to sexual violence, when I asked about initiatives taking place in Providence, perhaps by City Hall or in the schools, she was not able to name any. An ER nurse specially trained to do rape kits from Women and Infants Hospital told me that many victims who come in for a rape kit are not believed by the police. Providence clearly needs to take action in reducing sexual violence in our community. But can a man like Buddy Cianci, whose partners have alleged rape and abuse, be the leader we need to help solve these problems?

The CDC report emphasizes the need for prevention in solving this problem, particularly by educating children and teens about healthy relationships using thorough, ongoing programs, both in the community and in schools. Providence currently lacks these programs. Would Cianci take the necessary efforts to establish them seriously?

The CDC also suggests increasing access to the proper services for victims. Day One reports positive interactions with the Providence Police, but based on the W&I nurse’s report, they still need better training in responding to sex crimes. Day One has also been trying to expand their services, but they could use more funds. There is a large number of victims who need their services, especially in Providence, where rates of sexual violence are very high, partly due to human trafficking. Peg Langhammer, Executive Director of Day One, says in a recent video that “there hasn’t been a coordinated community response to this issue [of child sex trafficking].” It is Day One, not City Hall, who are taking the initiative in trying to fill this need. Is someone like Cianci going to take the need for greater efforts on the part of City Hall seriously? Can a man who is himself prone to violence effectively campaign to reduce violence?

My rapist walks free, as does the man Ruth Bandlow accused. When Nancy Laffey, a reporter for Milwaukee’s Channel 12, interviewed Bandlow in 1977, she showed her Cianci’s yearbook photo. She burst into tears, saying, “I can’t even look at him.”

I often think of her now as I walk or drive around the city, and I see sign after sign with his face and his name looming over the streets and sidewalks. To endorse a man is to forgive his past actions. Those who post the Cianci signs are forgiving what police considered strong evidence of a rape and stories from partners who said they were in physical and emotional pain living with him–not to mention a conviction for kidnapping and torture.

With their signs, they are saying none of that matters. The signs, and Buddy Cianci’s lead in mayoral-campaign polls, are symbols of the apathy the public feels towards rape victims. Peg Langhammer of Day One says that “it takes an entire community to effectively respond to this issue.” Cianci won’t respond. His supporters who hang his signs are declaring they won’t either.

Rape victims hide in plain sight. They are the men, women and children all around you; they are people you love living in silence. Ninety-seven percent of us walk around knowing our perpetrator is still out there. When we see those signs, we hear their voice in our heads, reminding us of what we fear most: “You don’t matter. You are nothing. I have all the power and I always will.”

Electing Cianci mayor, giving him power over our city once again, will make our fear a reality.

 

Sources:

(Note: all material attributed to “Buddy, we hardly knew ya” from the July 24, 1978 issue of New Times is taken from secondary sources, as the original article is not available for free online.)

  • Breiding, Matthew J., Smith, Sharon G., Basile, Kathleen C., Walters, Mikel L., Chen, Jieru, and Merrick, Melissa T. “Prevalence and Characteristics of Sexual Violence, Stalking, and Intimate Partner Violence Victimization – National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, United States, 2011.” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 5 Sep, 2014. Web. 25 Sep, 2014.
  • Cianci v. New Times Publishing Company McA a Z. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. 27 Oct. 1980. OpenJurist. Web. 3 Oct. 2014.
  • Day One Addressing What Matters. Perf. Peg Langhammer, Amy Battersby. DayOneSocial, 2014. YouTube.
  • “Day One Representative.” Telephone interview. 10 Oct. 2014.
  • Goldman, Andrew. “Why Would You Wish That on Me?” New York Times 23 June, 2013 Sunday Magazine: MM12. Web. 03 October 2014.
  • Milkovitz, Amanda. “A Window on Child Sex Trafficking in Rhode Island.”Providence Journal. Providence Journal, 17 May 2014. Web. 14 Oct. 2014.
  • “Reporting Rates.” RAINN. Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network, n. d. Web. 24 Sep. 2014.
  • “Sexual Assault Evidence Collection.” Day One Volunteer Training. Day One, Providence, RI. June 2012. Lecture.
  • Stanton, Mike. The Prince of Providence: The Rise and Fall of Buddy Cianci. New York: Random House. 2003. Print.
  • UPI. “R. I. Mayor Cianci Denies Alleged Rape Incident.” The Nashua Telegraph 10 Jul. 1978: 36. Web. 03 Oct. 2014
  • van Zuylen-Wood, Simon. “The Ballad of Buddy.” Boston Magazine Oct. 2014. Web. 03 Oct. 2014.

Why ProJo changed my bio on “Why Cianci’s Conviction Matters” piece


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

ProjoWhen ProJo ran my opinion piece, “Why Cianci’s conviction matters,” I knew what to expect.  Someone would probably bring up my past in an effort to shoot the messenger.  I figured it would be a Cianci supporter, or even a staffer, as any political campaign will typically have a comprehensive media strategy.  Perhaps it would be someone troubled by my community involvement.  The ironic part is it came from a left-leaning civil rights attorney who is actually reinforcing my message.

Oftentimes, one’s criminal history and the job they seek have little relation. Someone who sold drugs as a teenager may be a great chef, mechanic, or accountant. As a society, we should embrace those skills rather than send someone back into exile. And nothing is gained by continually referring to them as a “drug dealer” or “ex-con.”  Someone who was responsible for a financial scandal or someone who molested children, however, will naturally give us pause when hiring them around money or kids. It’s really that simple. This is the nuance advocates must use to counter the alarmists who would prefer to keep barriers in place.

The discussion around Buddy Cianci as a “twice convicted felon” has gone without nuance, and totally conflated issues regarding people like us who may need a second or third chance. My ProJo piece was a brief attempt to provide some clarity, and to put Cianci’s job application in context of thousands in Providence who have convictions.  I actually think he will be elected anyway, so its not an election I’m trying to influence but an issue I seek to discuss more intelligently than simple bashing and name-calling.

A Letter to the Editor followed my tepid piece on Buddy’s conviction in office (and I did not even get into his other alleged and admitted abuses of power).  In response, the ProJo altered my bio to include my murder conviction, as this constitutes “brief biographical data that might color a writer’s views.”  Color it how, one may ask?  My bio had already included my work in supporting people like Cianci, and myself, having the right to work.

Naturally there will be many who feel that my conviction history and time in prison is relevant to my position.  They may wonder what makes me a “criminal justice expert” beyond my years as an advocate, organizer, and my law degree. They might ask, as someone who fights so hard for the struggles of those of us with convictions, such as Buddy and myself, why I would not simply advocate for Buddy as “one of us.”  But others might find my history as relevant because they wish to muddy the message.

Clearly those seeking to sully a writer’s name are trying to undermine the content of the writing.  If I am a poor writer, don’t read it.  If my facts are wrong, seek a correction.  If my analysis is wrong, debate it.  But any effort that basically condemns my right to write, and my right to share, is not far from saying Buddy Cianci has no right to work.  As a limited public figure, I am open to criticisms.  If I worked for an organization, obviously it should be identified so our agenda can be a factor.

Buddy has been highly paid for his opinions on the radio, and I think that has been a perfect job for him since his release from prison.  He has added to the public discourse and clearly has a point of view to enrich many political discussions.  I, on the other hand, have not been paid for my opinions at all, nor for the learning that fuels the analysis.  Not by the ProJo, RI Future, or any of the other spaces through which I have shared.

If my conviction for interpersonal violence prohibits me from sharing an opinion from within the confines of my own home, how is that a Cianci supporter can justify a conviction for malfeasance in office not disqualify a man from working in that same office?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387