Speaker’s consultant toured proposed PawSox site with Skeffington in April


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Andrew-Zimbalist-590x900
Andrew Zimbalist

James Skeffington treated Andrew Zimbalist to a private tour of the downtown Providence site he envisioned as the new home of the Pawtucket Red Sox on April 15, two weeks before the influential sports economist became a $225-an-hour consultant to House Speaker Nicholas Mattiello on the idea.

“I wasn’t in town for the tour,” Zimbalist told RI Future. “I was in town for a lecture at Brown that I was committed to for many months. Skeffington and I spent about 30 minutes together total. We shared no meals or drinks. I had never met him before. I requested a tour after multiple requests from RI media to comment on [the] stadium.”

When asked how the tour and the meeting with Skeffington affected his opinion of the proposed stadium, he said, “I didn’t change my tune.”

House spokesperson Larry Berman, told RI Future that the Speaker “was made aware that Mr. Zimbalist requested a brief tour of the proposed site when he was in Providence attending an event at Brown University.”

Mattiello and Zimbalist both said there was no involvement from PawSox owners in Zimbalist’s hiring. The Providence Journal reported that “Mattiello said he asked the House policy director, Lynne Urbani, to research experts in the field of baseball stadiums and Zimbalist came ‘highly recommended.'”

Berman said Urbani came to recommend Zimbalist after she “read several articles which [Zimbalist] authored and/or was quoted on as an industry expert on sports economics and stadium proposals.”

Zimbalist first entered the Pawsox story on March 27, when RI NPR’s Scott McKay quoted him in a commentary piece.

Andrew Zimbalist a Smith College professor, is one of the foremost baseball economists in the country. He says, in general, that taxpayer subsidies for a stand-alone stadium with little else nearby ‘tend not to pay off economically.’

“Yet, Zimbalist says that there are psychic values to having a baseball franchise. As those of us who love baseball can attest, teams create community and civic pride. A new stadium could be a venue for high-school state championships and clinics for the young.”

Zimbalist struck an equally cautious tone when he was quoted in the Boston Globe on April 15, on the same day he toured the proposed stadium site with Skeffington.

Andrew Zimbalist, a sports economist at Smith College, countered that the cultural significance of bringing the PawSox to Providence could justify some public spending.

“‘I think this is a tremendous opportunity for the city and the state,’ he said.”

After the tour with Skeffington, Zimbalist became more excited with the project, as this April 17 piece from RI NPR’s Elisabeth Harrison shows. Note that this piece does not mention Zimbalist’s tour with Skeffington, though it is obvious that he has visited the site.

“But from his office at Smith College, sports economist Andrew Zimbalist said this proposal is different. For one thing, it involves the actual game of baseball, not some virtual game. And the site on the banks of the Providence River can hardly be beat.

“‘This ballpark is spectacularly situated. It’s close to downtown, it’s on the river, coming along with a riverwalk, it probably will promote hotel development there, there’s going to be a miniature baseball field, lots and lots of parking. It’s just a wonderful synergy possibility,’ said Zimbalist.

“By synergy, Zimbalist means the potential to bring visitors and other economic activity to downtown Providence. He said the PawSox estimate of $2 million in annual tax revenue from the ballpark is conservative. He believes the real number could be considerably larger down the road. And he points out the team is not asking the state or the city to shoulder any bond debt or cover cost overruns from construction.

“‘The fact that the owners of the team are putting forward $85 million, I think puts this in fiscal terms on the more generous side of these deals.’

“Zimbalist said the PawSox proposal should be seen as a starting point for negotiations. And he and Matheson agree the stadium would be a draw for the Providence waterfront. But the question remains just how much public money is worth plunking down to achieve it.”

Though Zimbalist insists that he didn’t change his tune, the evidence from news sources indicates a shift in his enthusiasm for the project after the tour with Skeffington.

This is the second time that Zimbalist’s neutrality on the subject of the moving the PawSox to downtown Providence has come under scrutiny. Zimbalist’s close ties to Major League Baseball, as a consultant, were revealed shortly after his hiring was announced on May 4.

When Speaker Mattiello hired Zimbalist, said Berman, quoted by Amy Anthony of the Associated Press, he “was aware of Zimbalist’s consulting work” with Major League Baseball and his relationship with the owners of the Boston Red Sox. Red Sox Owner Larry Lucchino is one of the owners of the PawSox.

“Anyone with that type of expertise has to be engaged in the industry,” Berman told the ProJo.

Patreon

A rebuttal to ProJo’s editorial on under-paying tipped workers


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

SMmpaydayRecently the Providence Journal published a piece panning the proposed legislation to raise the minimum wage for tipped employees, over time, to reflect the standard minimum wage for non gratuity-based wage earners.

Perhaps informing the public is no longer the point? These days, readers and residents can easily see through the truth-bending, mean-spirited talking points of the Providence Journal’s editorial section. The change in editorial tenor seems driven not by shrinking staff but rather by a unflinching desire to align with business and corporate interests.

Then again, maybe informing the public with informed opinion was never the point.

A friend recently told me about the editorial offices of the ProJo, in which are displayed the evidence of the newspaper’s record of having been on the wrong side of public opinion since shortly after dinosaurs made their final appearance on our earth. Even under their newest ownership, the newspaper’s editorial section retains consistency in choosing the wrong side of the debate. Here is why.

Though Rhode Island’s economy has shown some slight improvement, it remains sluggish. In this environment, the General Assembly should be encouraging growth, rather than making it more difficult for job-creating small businesses, including the state’s famous restaurants, to stay alive.

That is why the Assembly should reject a proposal, backed by a national lobbying effort, to massively increase the minimum wage for those who receive tips.

Decades of economic trial and error should have, by now, taught anyone and everyone who claims to have an interest in encouraging growth for more than just his or her own bank account, that economic growth requires an expansion of, not just small business, but also consumer purchasing power. In a business landscape reliant on discretionary expenditure, such as the restaurant industry, increasing the non-essential spending power of the workforce that helped to make the state’s restaurants “famous,” would be taking a page from Henry Ford’s book by allowing the workforce responsible for helping to produce a profitable product the financial empowerment to afford the product they help produce. Translation: if you want to know what actually trickles down, ask a plumber. I guarantee she will not say prosperity.

Additionally, the national lobbying effort has done very little to earn the support of the vast majority of Rhode Islanders polled as to whether or not they believe gratuity based employees should be paid more than $2.89 an hour by their employers. That support was earned by virtue of common sense.

Currently, the minimum wage for such workers is $2.89 an hour. Those seeking a change note the wage has not gone up a cent since 1996, and they argue for the wage to be brought up by 2020 to the level of the state’s minimum wage, currently $9.

What they leave out is that that $2.89 is not really the worker’s wage. Under state law, tips must make up at least the difference between that number and $9, or the employer must kick in the difference. Rhode Island follows the example of most states and the Internal Revenue Service in considering tips to be earned income.

As elusive as the Holy Grail, it appears we have found the one thing on which the business community and the IRS agree. Gratuities are earned income. But they are not paid by the employer. Therefore, if the majority of income earned by tipped restaurant employees is not paid by the employer, this appears to be skirting wage and hour laws pertaining to classification of employees.

Let us call gratuity based employment what it actually is: a sales job with profit based on voluntary commission. Normally, in a commission-based industry, commission is a contractually negotiated percentage of the sale of a good or service, paid by the employer or contractor. However, in the employment world of gratuities, that commission is paid directly by the consumer. Furthermore, it is voluntary and subject to the fancy of the consumer.

In most cases, the tips, keyed to rising prices, come through. According to Census data, Rhode Island’s tipped employees report they receive $12.12 an hour, 35 percent more than the minimum wage. And they may make more than they report. Research from the National Restaurant Association, a business lobby group, shows that, on average, tipped employees make between $16 and $22 per hour — well beyond Rhode Island’s current minimum wage.

Consider the source and the reference bias that comes with accepting a report from a business lobby group called the National Restaurant Association, while rejecting evidence by a national lobby for working people. Furthermore, after making the statement that employers must “kick in the difference” between the minimum wage and the actual earnings of the employee, the opinion writer then offers up the accusation that Rhode Island’s tipped employees are under-reporting their earnings by upward of ten dollars an hour.

The argument of the employer investing only $2.89 per hour because of an unsubstantiated claim of tax evasion by an undisclosed percentage of gratuity based restaurant staff while blindly assuming that all restaurants are complying with the regulation to compensate the difference between what they pay and the minimum wage is, at best, an abstract justification. At worst, it is a call for further regulation.

That is why most servers, asked whether they would prefer a $2.89 per hour minimum wage with tips or a flat $15 per hour wage, would go for the tips, says Dale Venturini, president and CEO of the business-funded Rhode Island Hospitality Association.

Most servers could very well mean six out of ten servers chosen, not at random, by “the business-funded Rhode Island Hospitality Association.” It could mean that forty-nine out of one-hundred servers refused to answer a question asked by counsel for representatives of an organization comprised of the owners of the restaurants for which the servers work. It is hardly compelling evidence to substantiate such a statement.

We are sympathetic with the struggle of unskilled workers to earn a living these days. According to an organization pitching a higher minimum wage called the Restaurant Opportunities Center of Rhode Island, some are not able to lift themselves out of poverty through such work. Tipped workers in the state, the center reports, receive about $638,000 in food stamps every month.

But would they be better off without jobs?

No. They would be better off without a condescending and thinly-veiled threat. They would be better off with an acknowledgement that what they do is a skill. They would be better off in an industry that does not boast one of the highest turnover rates. They would be better off exercising their right to organize and demonstrate by walking out, mid-shift on a Friday night rush because, while they are offered the opportunity to earn money for selling the restaurant’s dining experience to patrons, it is the patrons and not the restaurant that are investing the vast majority of the money to insure prompt service. To Insure Prompt Service = TIPS. Would they be better off without jobs? If someone pees on your shoe, should you appreciate that he or she did not stab you in the neck?

Many restaurants operate on very thin margins, and many go out of business. Tripling the cost of labor in five years would have the obvious effect of making it much more expensive to run a restaurant. Since businesses with small margins cannot afford to see profits shrink, they would have to respond by slashing costs (the quality of food and/or service) and/or by raising prices. Such changes would make people less likely to eat out, driving restaurants out of business.

I worked in the restaurant industry for 13 years. I was a front of the house, service-staff employee in every capacity. I was a server, a busser, a bartender, a bar back, a host, and a manager. The reason I left the industry was because there was no consistency of income. As a manager, I knew that I could over-schedule my waitstaff and “flood the floor” with servers in order to ensure potentially busy shifts would never result in the unlikely, but possible, event of getting slammed with too many guests at once.

Eighty to ninety percent of the time, that kind of rush did not happen. The restaurant would fill. But rarely would it be the maelstrom for which I over-prepared. Servers would have to “turn and burn” tables in small sections in order to make enough to make the aggravation worthwhile. Understandably frustrated servers would often give poor service and, as manager, I would take a dose of attitude from servers. But, at $2.89 per hour, it cost the restaurant very little to flood the floor.

Costs are going to rise and fall with the prices and availability of corn, gas, water, tomatoes, taxes, milk, bread, or window cleaner. Restaurants are still going to purchase these items. If a french restaurant encounters a hike in butter prices, they are not going to switch to canola oil. They probably will not go out of business. The restaurant will pay for butter because French cooking needs butter.

Restaurants should value investing in their ambassadors to the public as one of their most vital ingredients. After all, what a restaurant really sells is service. The opinion expressed in the Providence Journal editorial is one of antiquated greed and should be placed on the wall of the editorial office at the Providence Journal with the impressive collection of evidence of having opined on the wrong side of public opinion.

Hands Across The Sands: Remembering the BP disaster and RI oil ‘spills’


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

 hands across sandNarragansett, RI — The The Clean Dozen gathered as part of the international event remembering the BP oil disaster on Saturday. The rally at the town beach is a part of the build up to the ENVIRONMENT IS EVERYONE’S BUSINESS RALLY on June 10 at the RI State House from 5-7pm.

Watch this video of Saturday’s event set to Rhode Island’s Steve Dahl singing Neil Young’s “Who’s Gonna Save The Earth.”

In 1996, 820,0000 gallons of oil from the North Cape Cod Disaster forced over 100 square miles of fishing waters to be closed. Then-Governor Linc Almond said that while it was still too early to determine the economic harm from the spill, the damage would be significant for the state’s lobstering and fishing industries, according to this New York Times article about the spill.

In 1989 “The World Prodigy” tanker struck a reef off Newport and dumped about a million gallons of fuel oil into Narragansett Bay.

The lobster industry never recovered from this toxic shock and now Narragansett Bay is 3 or 4 degrees warmer than it was in the 1980’s which is driving native species out. Still think oil is a good idea?

Justice isn’t blind with data-based sentencing


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
The ACI

The ACIUp until July 2014, there was a system in place in determining federal and even some state prison sentences based on data analysis. Simply put, the courts would factor in an individual’s ethnicity, education, socioeconomic background, and even family’s criminal history.

Predictably, this caused non-violent offenders to receive severely harsh prison sentences based on their race, education and even their neighborhood. Such a system groups and generalizes people based on class or race, rather than recognizing the individual for who they are and what truly brought them to the point of crime.

In the federal court system there have been sentences of 25 years, or even life, for distribution of cocaine. The big data system would often deem such sentences as fair because of the statistical probability of the person to re-offend. They receive these extreme sentences for a nonviolent crime because of the possibility of a crime they didn’t commit. That is not justice.

Being both a criminal and a white male from an upper-middle class family, I’ve not experienced this in any sentencing I’ve received. I’ve always been sentenced based on my crime and past criminal history. Not surprisingly, white privilege exists even for criminals. This system is racist in how it functions and is designed to keep the lower class right where they are. Taxpayers who aren’t racists should be livid that even one penny of their money goes to fund such a system.

The very idea that American judges were handing down sentences based on someone’s race and social demographics is frightening. The margin of error is incalculable.

With this program our judicial system seems to be saying that minorities or people from a less advantageous background don’t deserve a second chance as much as someone from a different background? Doesn’t that kind of thinking fly in the fact of the beliefs this nation was built upon? Justice is supposed to be blind.

Rest in peace, Jim Skeffington


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

bob skeffingtonJim Skeffington, longtime Rhode Island power broker and new owner of the Pawtucket Red Sox who pushed hard to move the team to downtown Providence, passed away this weekend.

No one yet knows what this means for the controversial project, but I’m sure I speak for many in wishing his family and friends comfort in their grief. It was easy to not like the proposed relocation of the beloved team, but it was hard not to admire Skeffington’s pleasant demeanor and laser-focus on his goal.

Here’s video, unedited, of Jim Skeffington selling his idea to a group at the Mt. Hope Neighborhood Association on Thursday night. He was scheduled to give another such presentation tonight.

 

Weaponized grief: How the death penalty dehumanizes us all


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
rtx19ups.jpg.CROP.promovar-mediumlarge
Dzhokhar Tsarnaev

The arguments against the death penalty are clear and compelling, and I am not going to restate them here. Instead, I am going to attempt to show that the death penalty phase process, that is, the way in which we determine whether or not someone like Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is to be put to death, weaponizes the grief of victims and families of violent crime and ultimately dehumanizes all of us.

Tsarnaev committed monstrous acts of indiscriminate murder and terrorism. There is no excuse or justification for his crimes.

The way we determine whether or not the death penalty is to be applied is that a trial is separated into two phases. The trial phase, in which guilt or innocence is determined, and the death penalty phase, in which the jury considers whether or not the crimes are worthy of death.

Juries for death penalty cases are made up entirely of people who are pro-death penalty, at least in theory. In essence, every member of the jury disagrees with my assertion at the beginning of this piece, that “the arguments against the death penalty are clear and compelling.” Believing that the death penalty is wrong disqualifies a person from being on such a jury. Anyone with a religious or philosophical objections to the death penalty, and this would include many of the great moral leaders throughout history, are excluded from the process.

This is important because, when looking at the facts of the case, no one is more deserving of the death penalty, under the law, than Dzhokhar Tsarnaev. If the death penalty cannot be applied in the case of the Boston Marathon bomber, it applies to no one. Therefore, a jury of people who think that the death penalty is at least sometimes justified, is all but sure to apply it in the case of Tsarnaev. The jury becomes a loaded gun, and the prosecution merely needs to call the witnesses required to help pull the trigger.

During the Tsarnaev death penalty phase, the prosecution called family members of those who lost their lives. (For a complete picture of the process, see this excellent Washington Times piece.)

William Campbell Jr., the father of victim Krystle Campbell who was killed in front of Marathon Sports, was called to the stand Tuesday afternoon. The jury was shown pictures from Krystle’s entire life, including her prom picture.

‘I miss my hug everyday. She never left the house without giving me a hug.’

1601-12
Krystle Campbell

Jurors, says reports, “were brought to tears.”

As much as I am personally against the death penalty, I know in my heart that if my daughter was killed or grievously injured, I would be in court testifying for the execution of the person responsible, just like Campbell. I know that I would want my testimony to have the maximum impact. I would want the jury to understand that my daughter means as much to me as their loved ones mean to them. I would want them to imagine that my daughter was their daughter, and act on that emotion to punish the person responsible.

I could see myself throwing away everything I believe to satiate my need for vengeance and closure.

But in a world where there is no death penalty, my closure would not rely on the possibility of an execution. My closure and my healing would begin when Tsarnaev is locked away forever to dwell upon his crimes, never again to harm another person.

The death penalty phase asks victims and families of victims to use their grief, their loss and their misery as weapons. The only thing we truly have of those we lose is our memories, and this process requires that we use those memories not for joy and solace, but to punish and kill.

I cannot condemn those who choose to participate in the process and testify for the prosecution in the death penalty phase.

I would do no less.

But I do condemn a system that appeals to the worst in our natures, and encourages us to use all that we have left of our loved ones as an instrument of state sanctioned murder. Such a process is dehumanizing and worse: it forever darkens the legacy of those we have lost.

Patreon

‘Good To Go’


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

modern, wallpaper, train, white, miscellaneous, trainsRemember when you were a teen
And couldn’t wait to make the scene
Behind the wheel of your own car
Driving made you a superstar
But freedom on the open road
Was cut short as the traffic slowed
“A sign of progress” experts said
Congestion means full steam ahead

Remember your first airline seat
Runway rumble beneath your feet
The look of wonder in your eyes
As you wing through the friendly skies
Then flying lost some altitude
Lines got long, they stopped serving food
Like sardines in a sardine can
Congestion is their business plan

Remember your first railroad ride
The panorama countryside
Rambling by on iron wheels
The club car waiter serving meals
And then one day the train was new
More frequency and comfort too
But most of all it was faster
Racing to its own disaster

Traveling is a right they missed
On our Constitutional list
We need to get from here to there
By means that aren’t a double-dare
Drive a car and the road could sink
Is your pilot seeing a shrink?
Washington, invest the dough
Make America GOOD TO GO.

c2015pn
Read Peet Nourjian’s previous poems here.

NBC10 Wingmen: On Gina Raimondo


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

wingmen514Governor Gina Raimondo would like to expand the Commerce Corporation and shrink Medicaid. Perhaps only in Rhode Island is such a political actor also a Democrat.

To her credit, she also seems committed to raising the minimum wage and increasing the Earned Income Tax Credit. But she’s not really using any of her enormous political capital – gained through hurting unions, mind you – on anything aligned with the national Democratic agenda of tackling income inequality and ending poverty. This is traditionally how left-leaning thinkers would focus on jobs and the economy.

This is why conservatives like Jon Brien tend to support her and progressives like me tend not to.

News, Weather and Classifieds for Southern New England

SEIU proposes Medicaid solutions that don’t hurt workers

DSC_7488 SEIU 1199, representing about 4,000 health care workers in RI, held a press conference to announce a series of initiatives “to improve the way the state invests in Medicaid-funded programs in long-term care and create a pathway to living wages for caregivers.”

The press conference was part of a “Day of Action” at the State House, and was followed by SEIU members presenting their ideas to their state reps and senators ahead of the day’s legislative session.

“I love my residents like my own family, but at the end of the day, I don’t bring home enough money to take care of my two daughters,” said Nichole Ward, a certified nursing assistant (CNA) at Greenville Skilled Nursing and Rehab in Greenville, who spoke of the difficulty of not earning a living wage. “After working hard, being on our feet, taking care of people for 40 hours a week, I shouldn’t have to choose between my electric bill and school supplies for my kids. We deserve at least $15 an hour.”

Patrick Quinn, executive director of SEIU 1199 and a member of the Reinventing Medicaid working group, outlined the eight points of SEIU’s plan to both cut Medicaid costs and increase wages for frontline medical workers while improving health outcomes. The eight points are expanded upon in a white paper entitled From the Frontlines to the Bottom Line.

1. Create a value based purchasing program to improve care quality and staffing in nursing homes and reduce re-hospitalization.

2. Increase transparency of “related party” finances and reporting, in effort to reduce waste, fraud, and abuse.

3. Target any nursing home rate reductions toward costs unrelated to the provision of direct care, such as Fair Rental Value and “home office” charges.

4. Focus increased revenue and rate restoration initiatives on direct resident care and workforce stability.

5. Claw Back: Recoup Medicaid reimbursements that are not used for their intended purpose, especially in regards to direct labor.

6. Cap Medicaid reimbursement for executive compensation based on facility size.

7. Realize Medicaid savings though more energy efficiency initiatives.

8. Expand Rhode Island’s Paid Family Leave Program from 4 to 6 Weeks.

DSC_7494Speaking in support of the SEIU’s effort was Jenn Steinfeld of the Women’s Fund of Rhode Island, who sees this as both a social justice and gender equity issue.

It’s a gender issue on two fronts, says Steinfeld, because women live longer, and therefore make up 74 percent of the elderly patients in the Medicaid system and women make up 90 percent of the direct care workforce. Additionally, the over representation of minorities in the field makes this a racial justice issue, notes Steinfeld.

CNAs Dawn Auclair and Manoucheka Robert both spoke about the attachment they have to their patients, the importance of their work, and their difficulty in performing this valuable work for such low pay.

Sarah Nolan, who works for the SEIU International Policy Department in Washington DC, said that the white paper they have released focuses on both short and long term solutions to the problems in Medicaid quality and cost. She also stressed the importance of front line medical workers playing a role in these discussions.

Near the end of the press conference, CNA Nichole Ward explained that experience is key when dealing with patients. Cutting costs and worker turnover can raise the stress level of front line health care workers, and residents in nursing homes can sense that stress, even if healthcare workers think they are hiding it.

Such an environment cuts against the efforts to improve health care.

Patreon

Why Team SCA is the progressive favorite in the Volvo Ocean Race


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
DSCF4836
Team SCA sailing past Castle Hill, nearing the finish of Leg Six of the 2014/15 Volvo Ocean Race

All the teams in the Volvo Ocean Race use identical boats, they sail over the same waters, and they bounce over the same waves.

However, there is something very different with one team in this year’s 38,739 nautical mile race. Team SCA is the only all-women team in the otherwise male-dominated around-the-world sailboat race currently stopped over in Newport.

If there is a team for progressives to root for, it has to be SCA.

They aren’t the first all-female team in ocean racing: Maiden (89-90) in the Whitbread Round the World Race, Heineken (93-94), E F Education (97-98), and American Sports Too (01-02). But women remain under represented in the sport.

Many of the SCA crew started ocean racing solo for lack of opportunity in the primarily male sport. “There’s no way they would take a female on the boats,” said Sophie Ciszek, one of the crew for Team SCA.

So, often women took to solo racing, many in the Mini Transatlantic, sailing alone 4000 miles in 21 ft. long boats to break into the ranks of professional sailing. Team SCA finished the 5,000 mile sixth leg of the Volvo Ocean Race in Newport this last week along with five competitors. Thousands of fans were at Ft. Adams in Newport to welcome Team SCA. The six Volvo boats are on display this week at Ft. Adams, and start the next leg (to Lisbon, Portugal) Sunday, May 17th, at 2:00 PM.

The Volvo Ocean Race boats berthed at Ft. Adams in Newport
The Volvo Ocean Race boats berthed at Ft. Adams in Newport

SCA Corporation, an international paper products and forestry company based in Sweden, sponsored the female team. Its intent was to create a fully supported team, on the same level as the men’s teams. Team SCA began in 2012, when 250 women from all over the world applied for 11 positions. One by one they were eliminated and the chosen few went into training.

Approaching the Volvo finish in Newport, Team SCA squeezes everything oout of light winds
Approaching the Volvo finish in Newport, Team SCA squeezes everything out of light winds

Last year, they sailed into Newport as part of their offshore training. Skipper Samantha Davies and her crew-mates are soaked in extensive solo offshore racing experience and have the skills to sail alongside the boys. They proved that in the first week of Leg 6, sailing right up in the front pack, exchanging for the lead. That was sailing at its highest competitive level. Days before arrival in Newport, an unfortunate high pressure system cut them off from the leaders and set them back 100 miles.

Team SCA, sailing through the East Passage
Team SCA, sailing through the East Passage

On the positive side, they finished in daylight, and were treated to the beauty of Brenton Point, Castle Hill, Hammersmith Farm, and the Volvo Race Village at Ft. Adams.  Twelve hours earlier, Dongfeng, the winner, battled Abu Dhabi to finish in the dark. In a tense close fight, they finished three and a half minutes apart after seventeen days. That is nothing short of amazing and one-design sailboat racing at its finest! 7,000 plus fans on land and an estimated 200 boats cheered in the night time winners.

Team SCA, less than a mile from the finish
Team SCA, less than a mile from the finish

As the father of a daughter who sailed competitively in high school, I have witnessed women competing in sailing on an even footing. Both my children, sailing for Newport’s Rogers High School Sailing Team in the 1990s, competed on a coed basis. And the fastest Rogers High School Sailing Team skipper was a woman for several years. For sure, the Farr Ocean 65 racing sailboat is a handful, twelve-and-a-half metric tons (27,000 lbs.) of throbbing carbon fiber race horse. Lugging the sails below and dragging them up on deck, and constantly trimming and changing sails is no easy chore. Flying along at 20 knots, the 65 ft. hull must bang on the waves like a surfboard.

Okay, men are stronger on the whole. But with teamwork and pacing – critical for ocean racing – skilled and properly trained women are up to the job, as are some men. Furling the asymmetrical spinnaker when gybing into the East Passage off Jamestown, Team SCA executed the maneuver flawlessly in front of my eyes, with the rhythm of a Swiss watch- a fine finish to 5,000 miles of sailing under challenging conditions.

DSCF4830
Team SCA gybing to enter the East Passage, Block Island in the background

This Saturday, May 17th, at 2PM, the Volvo boats will race over a short course at the mouth of Narragansett  Bay. The fleet will start near the Ft. Adams shoreline and sail to a buoy off Castle Hill Lighthouse and back. The race will consist of two laps over this short course. Ft. Wetherill in Jamestown and Ft. Adams in Newport will be the prime viewing areas for those watching from land.

Team SCA has won two of the five in port races in the 2014/15 Volvo Ocean Race so far, third place overall for the in port races to date. Team Alvimedica, skippered by Rhode Islander, Charlie Enright, has also won one of the in port races so far, so the racing should be keen. The layout of the course will make for a lot of maneuvering at close quarters, something fun to watch.

DSCF4889
Team SCA at Ft. Adams, getting the boat ready for Saturday’s in port race and the Sunday start of Leg Seven, Newport to Lisbon, Portugal

Photos and story by Roberto Bessin 2015

Sports economist Victor Matheson: No public subsidies for new ballpark


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
buckingham_matheson
Victor Matheson

Dr. Victor Matheson, professor of economics at College of the Holy Cross, spoke to a capacity crowd at the Blackstone Valley Visitor Center in Pawtucket on the economics of public money funding sports stadiums, and specifically on public money building a new stadium in downtown Providence for the Pawtucket Red Sox (PawSox).

Overall, Matheson was not very amenable to the idea.

Matheson is an engaging speaker, an economist who specializes in sports. He prepared his remarks and his PowerPoint presentation for the price of a PawSox game, a hotdog and a beer, a far cry from the money Speaker Nicholas Mattiello or Governor Gina Raimondo are spending for their experts.

“Let me just lay it on the table here,” said Matheson at the start, “I’m going to be a critic of public subsidies for stadiums.”

providence-stadium-rendering-april-2015Showing the ubiquitous artists rendering of the proposed downtown stadium, Matheson said that it “would be a fantastic stadium for the owners to spend their own money on.”

Studying stadiums and their impacts, said Matheson, generates the “weird impression that the newer the stadium, the higher the attendance or the older the stadium, the higher the attendance.” McCoy Stadium, where the PawSox currently play, is the one of the oldest stadiums in the country.

Built for $1.5 million, McCoy was the most expensive stadium ever, in 1942. It’s construction, said Matheson, was a “massive debacle.” In 1966, when owners talked of moving out of the region, $100,000 in upgrades were done to McCoy, mostly taxpayer supported. In 1999, taxpayers ponied up for most of the $14.9 in needed upgrades, once again because the  owners threatened to move.

Matheson is not a fan of “Economic Impact” studies. If there is one thing to take home from his talk, said Matheson, it’s that “any economic impact study published by the people who are trying to justify public subsidies, you should always take with a grain of salt. And many grains of salt.”

There is, “remarkable agreement among economists finding that spectator sports result in little or no measurable economic benefits on host cities,” said Matheson, pointing out that money spent on such ventures is then not spent on other things a city needs. (Such as infrastructure, school repair and Medicaid, I will point out.)

Matheson then went on to explain how modern stadiums, unlike Fenway Park in Boston or Wrigley Field in Chicago, are not centers of economic activity that benefit surrounding businesses. Instead, modern sports stadiums are self contained oases surrounded by parking. The restaurants and amenities are not located throughout the city but within the stadium itself, generating revenue for the stadium owners, not the city.

Matheson compared minor league baseball teams to average 16-screen movie mega-plexes. In general, they perform about the same economically, yet no one is suggesting that movie theaters be publicly subsidized in anything like the kind of deal that baseball stadiums traditionally receive. “Are movie theaters exempt from sales tax, property tax, market value leases, etc.?” asked Matheson, “We would say that’s crazy.”

The kind of low paying jobs a minor league baseball stadium would generate will end up costing the state around $80,000 per year, per job. Matheson compared this number to the good paying jobs lured into South Carolina with the new Volvo plant. Good middle class jobs there cost the state $3,500 per year, per job in subsidies.

Towards the end of his presentation Matheson explored the possibility of the PawSox moving out of state in the event that they do not get the deal and the land they want in Providence. Looking at population statistics and the current locations of Major League, AA and AAA baseball teams, Matheson doesn’t see many viable options.

Matheson talked about the threats made by the owners of the Patriots when they talked about moving to Hartford or Providence. After not getting the deal they wanted from these other cities, they decided to stay in the Boston area, and built Gillette Stadium, because it was the best location, just as the Providence region (which includes Pawtucket) is the best place for the PawSox.

I hope to have the slides from Matheson’s talk soon and will post a video of his talk with the slides as soon as possible.

Patreon

Sojourner House needs community support for its transitional housing program


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

100_Logo_COLOR (2)By Vanessa Volz

This week has felt particularly challenging for those of us who work in the victim services field in Rhode Island. On Sunday, which was Mother’s Day, a 42-year-old East Providence woman was allegedly killed by her ex-boyfriend. On Monday night, a Cranston municipal court judge was arrested on charges that he allegedly choked his girlfriend. And these local incidents come on the heels of national news about a high-profile professional boxer with a history of domestic violence charges and the NFL’s questionable priorities when it comes to suspending players who have engaged in domestic assault.

Intimate partner violence is a serious public health issue both locally and throughout the country. An estimated 1 in 4 Rhode Island women will experience abuse at the hands of her partner. We know children who grow up in households witnessing violence are more likely to become perpetrators or victims of abuse.

Fortunately, there are local community resources for victims of abuse. Sojourner House is one of six domestic violence agencies in Rhode Island that provides direct services to individuals and families impacted by abuse. In 2014, we provided 3,094 emergency shelter bed nights, 4,930 transitional housing bed nights, and we answered almost 2,000 crisis phone calls. We also worked to break the cycle of violence with our prevention work, which reached 1,776 students in educational settings.

100 photoSojourner House is currently wrapping up its 100 Campaign, which ends this Friday, May 15. The 100 Campaign directly supports the agency’s transitional housing program, which provides longer-term housing (18 to 24 months) for families who need some additional assistance rebuilding their lives.

With six family apartments and four units available for single women, the program allows survivors of violence to live in their own space and receive supportive services as they get back on their feet. Clients are provided their own housing unit, and residents are able to access support groups, individual counseling, youth programs, HIV testing, immigration advocacy, and job training resources.

The goal of the 100 Campaign is to specifically secure donations of $100 or more from local community members to support this program. If 300 people donated just $100 each, the agency would reach its fundraising goal of $30,000, which would not only maintain the current program but allow for the lease of an additional apartment to house a family of four.

With the end of the Campaign just a couple of short days away, Sojourner House has raised well over $25,000, but we are still seeking community support to make this final push to reach our goal.

The words of a former transitional housing client best sum up the significance of the work that Sojourner House does with this program:

“I felt like my life was about to explode. It’s difficult to leave a home where my kids had their own space and their own privacy… For my children and me, this apartment marked a turning point: I was able to sign a lease as head of household for the first time. My kids finally had a home with space and privacy again. In short, we got our life back. Thank you for putting a set of keys in my hand and trusting me with this opportunity of a new life.”

Join our efforts…become 1 of the 100 Campaign donors!

 

Vanessa Volz is the Executive Director of Sojourner House. You can find out more about their work and the 100 Campaign at www.sojournerri.org.

Frontline caregivers to hold Medicaid ‘Day of Action’ at State House


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Caregiver WagesHealth care workers and allies will host a press conference and policy brief at the State House on Wednesay to advocate for Medicaid changes to improve the system of long term care and support a living wage for caregivers. SEIU District 1199NE, which represents approximately 4,000 health care workers in RI, will be issuing a new policy brief with proposals to improve the way the state invests in Medicaid funded programs in long-term care and create a pathway to living wages for caregivers (including staffing policies to improve quality of care and reduce re-hospitalizations).

A recent poll conducted by Fleming and Associates found that 69% of Rhode Islanders support paying a living wage of $15 per hour for frontline workers in nursing homes and community based agencies caring for those with developmental disabilities. Copies of the poll results will be available at the event.

  • WHO: Frontline caregivers (including CNAs and Direct Care Staff) and Leaders of SEIU 1199NE and Women’s Fund of RI
  • WHAT: Policy Brief & Press Conference about Medicaid changes that strengthen the system of long term care and support a living wage for workers
  • WHEN: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 at 2:15pm (Press Conference and unveiling of Medicaid policy brief) followed by lobbying visits at 3:30pm
  • WHERE: State House, Room 101

Caregivers have an important voice and perspective in the current debate about improving Medicaid funded long term care system in Rhode Island. Frontline health care workers provide compassionate care and in many instances play the role of family for their residents and clients; despite this many CNA’s and Direct Care Staff are not earning enough to support their own families.

A 2013 analysis using survey data from a nationally representative sample of 1174 nursing homes demonstrated that nursing homes with high CNA turnover had more than triple the odds of resident pain, and approximately double the odds of both pressure ulcers, and urinary tract infections. Also, a Kaiser Family Foundation report suggests that improving staff-to-resident ratios and reducing turnover is one strategy to assist in lowering avoidable re-hospitalizations.

While Rhode Island spends a comparable amount on Medicaid as Connecticut and Massachusetts, compensation for caregivers lags behind our neighbors (see chart below).  Many health care workers in Rhode Island are joining the growing national #Fightfor15 campaign demanding a living wage of $15.

11 RI cities, towns violate ‘Ban the Box’ law


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

acluAt least 11 municipalities in Rhode Island ask job applicants a question on their application forms that is prohibited by law.

The questions vary in wording, but each asks job applicants about their criminal record–a practice that has been illegal in Rhode Island for over a year. As a result, the ACLU of Rhode Island and Direct Action for Rights and Equality (DARE) have sent letters to those municipalities – from Burrillville to Warwick to Narragansett – asking them to promptly remove these questions.

In 2013, the General Assembly amended the state’s Fair Employment Practices Act to provide that, with a few exceptions not relevant here, questions about a person’s past criminal convictions could not be included on employment application forms and could instead only be asked “at the first interview or thereafter.” This “ban the box” law is designed to ensure potential employees are screened based on their qualifications, not their past.

As the letter explains:

The General Assembly enacted this prohibition in recognition of the fact that employment is a pivotal factor in preventing recidivism and that ex-offenders have faced widespread and unfair discrimination in seeking jobs. Well-qualified applicants – even those with long-past criminal records irrelevant to the job for which they were applying – were often excluded from consideration before even having a chance for an interview to demonstrate their qualifications. However, the inquiry on your application form is directly contrary to, and undermines the goal of, the statute to address this inequity.

This month, the ACLU examined the employment application forms of the twenty-nine municipalities that post those forms online after receiving a complaint about one of them. Of the eleven cities and towns that improperly ask criminal record questions, some inquire whether the applicant has ever been convicted of any crime, some limit the inquiry to felonies, and some ask for conviction information for the past five or seven years. And while some of the forms assure applicants that a criminal record does not automatically disqualify them from employment, all of those questions are illegal, and have been since January 1, 2014 when the “ban the box” law took effect.

We’ve asked the municipalities to revise their forms, online and in any other format, within the next two weeks. The ACLU and DARE will consider taking further steps if any cities or towns fail to comply with the statute.

The municipalities that ask about applicants’ criminal record and were sent letters were: Burrillville, Charlestown, Cumberland, Hopkinton, Jamestown, Lincoln, Narragansett, Newport, North Providence, Pawtucket, and Warwick. The ACLU is filing open records requests with the ten towns that did not have their forms posted online and were thus not reviewed.

By discriminating against anyone with a criminal record, these cities and towns are turning away able and qualified applicants. This unhelpful and illegal practice must promptly end–as it should have when it was prohibited last year–so qualified Rhode Islanders have the opportunity to lead productive lives regardless of their past actions.

Fred Ordoñez, executive director of DARE, the organization that led the push for passage of the “ban the box” law, said: “It’s sadly ironic that these municipalities can break a law with little consequence, yet regular people’s criminal record turns into a life sentence of unemployment.”

Alert: Key hearing on Custom House tax breaks Thursday


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

custom houseThis Thursday at 6pm, the Finance Committee of the Providence City Council is meeting to consider a generous tax break proposed for the Custom House downtown office building.

Currently, the Custom House is downtown office space, and the developers want to convert the upper floors to apartments. And they want public money to do it.

The deal the developers are pushing for is structured as a 12-year tax stabilization. For the first three years, there would be no new taxes, and the new taxes would ramp up over the next nine years. Make no mistake, this is a special deal for a specially connected developer. These deals aren’t being made available to ordinary small-time developers, who can’t afford the same network of well-connected lobbyists, lawyers, and tax credit brokers. If you expand your house or renovate a dilapidated triple-decker, you don’t get your taxes stabilized.

This special tax break is crucially important because the city is currently writing a standardized policy on special tax breaks for big developers. During the campaign, Mayor Jorge Elorza was critical of the abuses of the tax-stabilization agreement program.  Newly elected Council President Luís Aponte has been even more vocally critical of abusive and unfair special tax breaks for developers.  According to multiple City Hall sources, the new standardized policy could severely restrict some abuses, making these special breaks much shorter than the twelve years being proposed for the Custom House.

That’s why stopping this deal is so vitally important.  If the city approves an excessively long twelve-year stabilization, it will set the bar abysmally low for the standardized policy.   Valuable revenue that could go to underfunded priorities like schools, snow plowing, and tax relief will be wasted on corporate special interests.

There is serious skepticism on the Council over such an overly generous deal.  Its future is very much up in the air.

That’s why it will be so important to come to this hearing at 6pm in the Council chambers.  We can stop this unfair deal.

What should be done about RIPTA’s deficit?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

RIPTAAt the May 5 Senate Finance RIPTA budget hearing, RIPTA CEO Ray Studley projected a $1.4 million deficit this fiscal year, and about a $5.6 million deficit next year (which starts July 1), and said he is “running out of options” to reduce deficits without cutting service.

This deficit is mostly due to paratransit, or transit for people with disabilities. Changes to this program may cost RIPTA about $5.9 million next year due to elimination of the “Rhody 10” revenue and the shift of many clients from some DHS programs to unreimbursed but expensive ADA rides. There was also a loss of revenue due to changes at Johnson&Wales that reduced sales.

His “ask” to address this, as far as I can tell, was to refer to bill H6108 which seems to authorize RIPTA to charge a $1 fare to the 1/3 of all passengers who ride free, mainly low income seniors and the disabled.

It would also have the state make up any further subsidy needed as result of this reduced fare. Studley noted this is still more generous than federal requirements which allow full fare during peak hours. He indicated that with 5.6 million free rides/year, such a $1 fare with expected elasticity might produce about $3 million in additional revenue. He noted one reason for the high number of free rides is a generous qualification level at incomes up to 200% of poverty, Mr. Studley suggested consideration of lowering it to 150%.

It seems Pennsylvania and Illinois are the only other states having a comparable free ride level but those states explicitly make up the lost revenue with a state appropriation.

Studley also hinted at another gas tax hike dedicated to RIPTA, (there was a map of state gas tax rates in the power point) noted that is what happened last time RIPTA took a hit from changes in Medicaid transport policy. However, the gas tax is already going up 1 cent in July (RIPTA should get 5% of the additional revenue, about $210,000) and with MA gas tax 6.5 cents less than RI it will be a challenge to get the Assembly to boost it further.

The senators asked about fuel costs, the paratransit system, overtime expenses, but made no suggestions to close the deficit.

Charging low income seniors and disabled a fare is a sensitive subject but it is worthy of serious consideration as there seem no easy alternatives. Most passengers, RIPTA employees, and transit advocates who see the potential of transit to help our core cities, the economy and the environment, think the worst thing would be to reduce service, especially as lines with weak ridership have already been weeded out by the recent route study assessment. While a little revenue can be gained by higher fares on long distance park and ride expresses, a fare increase above $2 in the metro area may provide little additional revenue and would hurt the mostly low income working people who pay the fares.

I don’t expect much more help from the Governor. Channel 10 reported she stated her high priority was to end the car excise tax. That would be a boon to those households with many cars, or expensive cars, but at the expense of those without.

Perhaps RIPTA could do more to rebuild paying ridership which took a hit with the long KP construction and the snowstorms. It was also noted at the fare study hearing how little revenue was being generated by the employer-supported “ecopass.” Note that there is very limited support for Upass support from public colleges. For example, while Brown faculty and staff (as well as students) can ride “free” with Brown IDs, no such benefit is available to faculty and staff from CCRI, RIC or URI, not even at URI-Providence in the midst of congestion but with good transit access and where the “free” parking provided in the Convention Center garage is very expensive.

I welcome suggestions on how to proceed as does the RIPTA Riders Alliance.

Medicaid on the Move


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Strengthening Rhode Island Medicaid_Final_5 8 15.020The 7th Annual Budget Policy Conference, a fundraiser for the Economic Progress Institute (EPI), had a timely theme: “Medicaid on the Move.”

Since Governor Gina Raimondo announced a Medicaid crisis in February and the creation of a working group of “27 members from across health care, business, state government and community and nonprofit organizations” to deal with the crisis, the idea of “Reinventing Medicaid” has become a central part of the state’s 2016 budget process.

Medicaid is a state and federally supported system of health care that targets the most vulnerable and least represented people in our community, i.e. children, low income adults, the elderly and those with mental or physical handicaps. So special attention must be paid to the process of “reinventing” the system and therefore an appropriate target for a progressive economic institute such as EPI to address.

Governor Raimondo gave the opening address to the breakfast crowd, mostly made up of medical policy wonks and EPI supporters. She used the opportunity to press for a $10.10 minimum wage and for an increase in the earned income tax credit from 10 to 15 percent, possibly her two most progressive ideas in her 2016 budget proposal.

Moving onto Medicaid, Raimondo insisted that her goal in pulling together the working group is “not about kicking people off Medicaid” but “getting people cared for in the lowest cost environment.”

Raimondo acknowledged that the EPI and many of those in the audience are more concerned with social justice and economic justice than they are with short term budget fixes when she said, near the end of her speech, “Your stubborn idealism is a good thing for Rhode Island, so don’t lose it.”

Linda Katz, policy director and co-founder of the EPI, spent 14 minutes introducing the audience to the basic facts about Medicaid. In the video below I’ve combined the slides from her presentation with the talk she gave.

Katz is a member of the Reinventing Medicaid working group. The first weeks of work by the working group, Katz suggested, was preliminary. Now, as the working group prepares to move ahead and plan the implementation of the ideas presented, Katz says that she’s “looking forward to part two, where we take a deeper dive into Medicaid.”

Cindy Mann, former Medicaid Director in the Obama Administration, began her talk noting that this July will mark the 50th anniversary of Medicaid. Medicaid, says Mann, “is constantly reinventing itself.”

Over the course of her talk Mann explained exactly who Medicaid serves, and why Rhode Island is in many ways both an outlier and a leader in the way we administer the program. In the video below I’ve combined the slides from her presentation with the talk she gave.

For instance, “Rhode Island has, as a population, more elderly and disabled” than many other states, said Mann. Three percent of our Medicaid enrollees account for 70 percent of our Medicaid spending.

Mann made a special point to mention the medical care of the incarcerated, surely the population our society seems least vested in. When people in our prisons require outpatient care, that is, medical services the prison hospital is unable to meet, Medicaid covers the expense. Mann maintained that the state should make sure that “no one leaves jail without being assessed for health care coverage.”

Former Lt. Governor Elizabeth Roberts, who Governor Lincoln Chafee tasked with setting up the state’s health care exchange and who Raimondo put in charge of the working group, spoke last.

Roberts said that she and the working group instead worked to reform the system. “We did not remove benefits,” said Roberts. In addition to the recommendations of the working group, Roberts feels that there needs to be a pay increase for certified nursing assistants and home health care workers, who are being squeezed economically.

Roberts also agreed with Katz about the second phase of the working group’s mission. The “next 2 months,” said Roberts, “will be more important than the last 2.” The working group issues its final report in July.

Patreon

Incarceration is the new slavery


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
The ACI

The ACISlavery is the most extreme form of stratification. It relegates people to the status of property for the purpose of producing labor. The slave is a commodity. The slave trade was very profitable on an economic level and very damaging on others. Slavery is now prohibited by every nation in the world and is declared so in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

But is slavery dead, or has it been reborn in a new form? I believe slavery is still alive and is in fact thriving. Slavery has adapted to the times. Modern mental slavery imprisons the mind while the body appears free.

Now ask yourself how does one come to have a slave mentality? It runs deep. This country is built on slavery and all the policies keep minorities in an oppressive state. Here’s a little history on the slave trade and its wonders. It was the interest and business of a slave owner to study human nature. They were good at breaking men and making slaves. They all had different ideas and methods they used to keep the slaves more efficient and submissive to their every command.

The ultimate goal was to create a method or system that could keep the slaves basically enslaving themselves. Virginia in the year of 1712 had a British slave owner by the name of Willie Lynch, who created the system that would enslave African Americans for generations.

They compare the process of breaking a horse to making a slave. Cardinal principles were to break you from one form of life to another. Reduce them from their natural state in nature. The focus was on the female slaves and their offspring. Everyone knows mothers will do whatever it takes to protect their children. So you prey on that to break the will to resist.

In doing so they would get the toughest, meanest male slave, and viciously beat him in front of the other female slaves and their children, and then kill him to put fear in them. After witnessing something like this, what do you think the mothers will teach their children? The male children to be mentally weak and dependent, and the females to be independent. So take away the fathers and leave the female to raise and break the offspring in the early years of development with her natural protective nature.

Does any of this sound familiar?

What race has the most single-parent households with the mother all alone to raise young men and women? Single, independent black women. I know you heard that term before. Psychologically, the effect that slavery had on our culture runs deep. We went from overseers on a plantation, which was someone who harassed and watched over your every move, to officers in the streets. You see it every time you turn on the news.

I was watching the news the other day and there were covering some of the unjust and discrimination that African Americans endure. And the news reporter asked a young African American woman who was a mother what she would tell her son about the young African American teenager that was gunned down by a police officer for allegedly showing aggression. The young mother said she wouldn’t tell him anything; she said she would teach him that when he sees a police officer, take his hands out of his pockets, be polite even if the officer is not, and to comply with everything he says no matter what he says, because I just want my baby to come home. Motherly instinct at its best.

Some of you reading this are probably thinking no way. Slavery is morally inhumane and it’s been abolished in this country. It says to in the constitution, the 13th Amendment was the act to abolish and outlaw such a dehumanizing thing as slavery.

Read carefully the exact words of the oh-so-important 13th Amendment so you don’t misunderstand: “neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.”

So in other words, according to this so-called punishment clause, if you get arrested, no matter how minor or major the offense, and get convicted, there’s nothing in that 13th amendment to ensure you can’t be enslaved by your state. This clause is being used to reinstate slavery under another guise.

No wonder America’s quick to criminalize everything and lock you up—it’s big business. They hole slave trade was based on economical gain. Now ask yourself, what groups of people come to jail the most? You guessed right if you said minorities and the lower class. Think about that.

If you owned a business, what would you do to keep it running? Keep your supply and demand up, right? If you owned a prison, you would keep your customers coming back. American locks up half a million more people than China, whose population is 5 times greater than that of the United States. Statistics show America holds 25% of the world’s prison population, and only 5% of the world’s people. What does that tell you?

The prison system is big business; it’s estimated that prisons make over $3 billion yearly and that number is growing. Statistics show that black men are incarcertated six times the rate of white men, and government studies also found that black men are at a higher chance to being searched, prosecuted, and convicted more than white men, and serve longer prison sentences.

Constant social injustice and inequalities have a major influence on black males’ psychological development and life course trajectories and transitions. Mass incarceration is a new way of reimposing the Jim Crow laws to segregate. By definition, slavery goes far beyond the actual removal of freedom; it denies the humanity of the enslaved.

Racially imbalanced enforcement also means that minorities are more likely to suffer consequences that outlast their prison sentences, like difficulty finding jobs and housing, lost access to government benefits and in some places disenfranchisement. The prison system makes so much money that it encourages racist practices in the American criminal justice system.

At the economical height of slavery there were approximately four million African American slaves. Today there is approximately six million African Americans in some form of incarceration or “correctional supervision”: prison, probation, or parole. That’s more people locked up than were slaves at its highest peak.

Or is it just slavery adapting to the times? The prison system is among the most profitable industries in the United States. Despite our nation’s self-perception as a bastion of freedom, we lock up more people than anyone else in the world. But we have songs about the “land of the free”. What an oxymoron.

What’s more important to you: schooling for higher education, or mass incarcerations? Like minds will say education, because our children are most important right? You see, there’s a question mark because if you were interested and cared about something like education, you would show it in every way possible by your actions and concerns, but that’s not the case. It seems as if mass incarceration is more important.

The money that states spend on prisons has risen six times the rates of spending on higher education. What does that tell you? It seems to me they’d rather put you in prison than through school. In urban communities, they cut all funding for after-school programs, recreation centers and other extra-curricular activities. What’s left for these kids to do to occupy their time? If kids are the heart and soul of this country and hope for the future, wouldn’t it be in our best interest to help them be all they can be? What do your schools look like? Are they clean? Are the books and curriculum and the teachers teaching up-to-date? Some of you reading this might think, “who has schools like that?”, while for others this is the norm.

In all actuality, this should shock and appall you that the environment we teach kids in is not up to Grade A standards. I speak for myself when I say the schools I’ve attended weren’t up to standard. In come from the inner city urban community, a predominantly black and Hispanic neighborhood. I remember going to school in the summer and it being hot and going to school in the winter and it being too cold. Try learning under those conditions, with outdated books they used to teach your parents that still says that Christopher Columbus discovered American. If you still believe that, chances are you went to one of those schools.

Schools have adopted this “zero tolerance” policy where anything they presume as deviant will kick you out of school or even worse, lock you up, depending on what you’ve done. My point is this: we’re failing to realize that we’re dealing with adolescent kids that are dealing with emotions or feelings they can’t describe or understand, so they’re confused and don’t know how to express themselves. So instead of a “zero tolerance” policy, how about a “try-to-understand” policy!

Don’t get me wrong, I know there are plenty of teachers that truly care and love their students, but they’re underpaid with not enough resources. I think America should stop trying to criminalize everything and try to find solutions instead of spending all of that money on the “war on drugs” that never seems to be ending, due to the success of mass incarceration and waging a “war on schools”. That to me seems like you’ll get better results from if you really cared about the children. With all this being said I ask one last question: is the system set up against us? Or is it slavery in a more modern form?

This post is published as part of the Prison Op/Ed Project, an occasional series authored by CCRI sociology students who are incarcerated at the Rhode Island Adult Correctional Institute. Read more here:

Beluga whales spotted in Narragansett Bay


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
beluga
Click on the image for more of David DeSalvo’s pictures of the beluga whales.

How rare of a marine mammal sighting are the beluga whales that have been spotted at various locations in Narragansett Bay on Sunday and Monday?

“It’s the second one ever in Rhode Island,” said Bob Kenney, an oceanography professor at the URI Bay Campus who studies whales and wrote this about belugas.

“The first one was last year,” he added.

In July, 2014, a fisherman spotted and videoed a lone beluga whale in the West Passage between Jamestown and Saunderstown. At roughly the same time, a second beluga whale was seen in the Taunton River near Fall River last year.

Then on Sunday, David DeSalvo and Matt King videoed three beluga whales north of the Newport Bridge and just off the eastern shore of Jamestown. DeSalvo estimated they were about 12 to 15 feet long.

On Monday morning, the RI Department of Environmental Management fielded reports that the three beluga whales were seen further north up Narragansett Bay off Rocky Point in Warwick. A team from DEM and Mystic Aquarium dispatched a 22-ft research boat, crewed by two biologists and a veterinarian, to ensure the mammals are healthy on Monday. They appeared healthy in the video, said April Valliere, a supervising biologist who studies marine mammals with DEM.

She said increasingly colder waters in southern New England may be enticing beluga whales from their native habitat of the St. Lawrence Seaway in northeastern North America.

“I suspect cooler water temperatures have something to do with it,” she told me. “It’s off several degrees. It’s still in the 40’s outside the Bay.”

But she said scientists really don’t know yet. “We’re not really sure. Obviously there is food for them,” she said, noting that squid and menhaden are now running in Narragansett Bay.

There’s a theory that the heavily-polluted St. Lawrence may be causing cancer in beluga whales. Perhaps the pearl white whales are relocating to a cleaner habitat? In a Providence Journal op/ed last year, Mystic Aquarium President Steven Coan said a changing climate is opening up new southern habitat to beluga whales. “The sight of a Beluga in southern New England is rare and unusual today but could quickly become a more frequent occurrence. Climate change is affecting our seas and the creatures that live in them. In some cases the natural food supply for a certain species may shift location, moving to a warmer or cooler spot in the ocean.

Beluga whales aren’t the only whales that visit Narragansett Bay. Minkie whales frequent the lower Bay as does the occasional fin whale in the winter. Several species of whales live in or pass through the Rhode Island and Block Island sounds, the parts of the Atlantic off the coast of Rhode Island.

Whales are protected by the Marine Mammal Protection Act, and as such it’s a felony to disturb them. Boaters, Kenney and Valliere both stressed, should take extreme caution.

“Anything a boater does that disturbs teir natural behaviors is a violation of federal law, you could go to jail for up to two years” Kenney said. “The best thing to do is shut the engine down and watch them. They may just come close. But don’t chase them.”

Rhode Island: you want to be here


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

The future of Rhode Island could be very simple…

Our goal could be to intentionally make our small state an expensive place to do business in, but make it worth every penny.

For every dollar in taxes paid, our citizens would reap benefits. The purpose of commerce is to support the people, not the reverse.

How could this come about?

rhodeislandIt begins with the governor, speaker and senate president declaring that no longer will our state subsidize and pander to business.

Instead, we will insist that corporations, like citizens, contribute to the well being of our communities.

No longer will we bribe businesses with cash and tax cuts. Our government will take its share and use it wisely.

Money will be spent on those things that Government can do well, when it is not gasping for cash: improve the roads, build statewide infrastructures, contribute to the education of its citizens, protect our environment, and provide for public safety.

Our polity cannot predict or gamble on the industries of the future. Likewise, we must not allow ourselves to be cowed into beggardom by greedy national and international corporations.

We are a small and lovely state in a prime location on the East Coast. We have the wealth of the sea at our doorstep. Because of past failures, we are severely undervalued, yet those of us who have lived here for a long time know that this truly is a marvelous place, a home to live in for an entire life.

Of course there are problems in our body politic. No human system is perfect, but it is insane to funnel millions from taxpayers into for-profit businesses, or to cut taxes for large corporations to “encourage growth” or “attract jobs”. The wealthy have learned that the threat of scarcity prods politicians to fork over money from citizens. Failures are rarely blamed on the businesses, which have banked their gold, but on the politicians.

Rhode Island will never thrive if we depend on companies that require payoffs and “incentives.” It is illegal for a United States citizen to pay bribes in other countries, but here in Rhode Island campaign contributions and bills that grease a bottom line are considered legal and even necessary.

It is no longer acceptable.

The spigot from gambling is about to thin as more casinos open nearby. We cannot afford to give a single dollar to underwrite someone else’s profit margin. Our government is notoriously bad at picking “winners.”

We must begin tooting our horn, not in our own backyard, but around the world. We have natural beauty, localized industry, centers of higher education, a diverse population, and restaurants and arts that are world-class. No more government handouts for businesses. No more racing to the bottom to underbid our wealthy neighbors.

We will point to our resources: citizens who are eager for work, a coastline that inspires, deep water ports, real estate that is reasonably priced, and a long history of innovation in design, education, manufacturing and reinvention.

We will loudly disavow the efforts of the one percent to leach off the work of the average citizen, while simultaneously nullifying the powers of government to improve the common lot.

Our state can willingly offer companies an easier path to regulation and licensing, modification to roads, worker-training schemes in community colleges. We can rebuild our urban schools so that companies can feel comfortable knowing that their workers can accept reasonable wages and send their children to public schools.

We can acknowledge the shifts that climate change and global warming are likely to bring, and plan future building and growth carefully.

These changes will not see a quick stampede of business toward our shores.

Given our history of corruption, it will take time for them to believe. During that time, our government will have no choice but to learn to do more with less, to increase efficiency and eliminate redundancy and waste. We must continue to protect those who have little, and resist the idea that poverty is sin and an inescapable trap. We must teach our children for their benefit, not for the profit of an increasingly corporate education industry. We can encourage our existing small businesses to grow with confidence knowing that they’re getting the same fair treatment as the giants.

We only need to stop begging and bribing and change our philosophy.

Our new slogan could simply be, “Rhode Island: you want to be here.”

Now we must work to make it so.

©2015 by Mark Binder
393 Morris Avenue
Providence, RI 02906
(401) 272-8707
mark@markbinder.com


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387