So Long, Anthony Gemma


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Anthony Gemma

Anthony GemmaThe best thing about today being the primary is RI Future will likely not have reason to run this picture of Anthony Gemma anymore.

Seriously, we’ve been recycling it throughout the campaign – whether we were accusing him of phonying up his social network following, chasing him down at his announcement to ask him a question, taking on his false claims to be more progressive than David Cicilline, poking holes in his jobs plan, poking fun at him for saying he wouldn’t support his fellow Democrats unless they supported him or, in his grand finale, calling him out for his wildly irresponsible allegations of voter fraud.

It’s high time all of that stop, and for Anthony Gemma to go away.

He won’t win, says Ian Donnis. The only thing left to decide is how much momentum his campaign will siphon away from Cicilline’s defense against conservative Republican Brendan Doherty.

Thus, Anthony Gemma’s big accomplishment will be making a mockery out of himself, the process and, to no small extent, the press, which took him way too seriously for way too long and gave him a toxic soapbox from which to smear his opponent with allegations of voter fraud.

It was the dirtiest campaign I ever had the displeasure of covering, and certainly the lowest I have ever witnessed a candidate stoop. And I look forward to the day when we don’t see that picture on this site anymore.

Poor Edumacation In CD1 Democratic Debate


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Education. We spend a lot of time arguing about this. Wave after wave of education reformer has appeared, each with their own unique (and often uniquely wrong) method of “solving” education. And boy, if you cared at all education issues, the CD1 Democratic debate was not your night.

Public Schools

The Journal‘s Edward Achorn asked a leading question about supplying school vouchers. Thankfully, neither David Cicilline or Anthony Gemma support those. But if you thought Democrats were staunch defenders of public schools, you might be asking yourself if you could get some new defenders.

Gemma Says Providence Public School Grads Are Stupid

This had to be the point when I, personally, wanted to strangle Mr. Gemma, because he wasn’t just attacking Mr. Cicilline (I don’t particularly care about that), he was attacking me and my friends. He attacked pretty much anyone who passed through Providence Schools from the years of 2003 and 2010. Actually, RI Future contributor Steve Ahlquist has the best line on this, so let me quote his tweet:

#WPRIdebate Gemma says my kids were failed by Providence School system. I’ll call my daughter at Cornell, break the news to her.

— steveahlquist (@steveahlquist) August 29, 2012

Full disclosure, I attended the same schools as Mr. Ahlquist’s daughter for 12 years. Unlike Mr. Gemma’s descriptions of us, we can, in fact, “read and write and do math” and are not in need of adult education. A great many Providence school grads are, contrary to the rumors produced by the haters, “productive members of society.” In fact, I can do statistical analysis, and my writing skills are on display here, and I’ve graduated from a four-year college in four years. Actually, from the time I graduated high school in the fifth year of Mr. Cicilline’s term, to 2010, four year high school graduation rates in Providence were higher by 10 percentage points (increasing from 58% to 68%). What probably keeps Providence grads from being even more productive members of society is the lack of jobs.

No one from this school could possibly aspire to be Mayor of Providence or Governor of Rhode Island.

But the big problems with Mr. Gemma’s statements are that he over-relies on testing data, which is a crappy way of measuring education success. Kristina Rizga, of Mother Jones, recently published an article entitled “Everything You’ve Heard About Failing Schools Is Wrong“. In it she discusses just how distorting testing data is. And just how detrimental it is to good schools that people love. Her key line about getting good information other than testing data about how schools are doing: “It’s easier for a journalist to embed with the Army or the Marines than to go behind the scenes at a public school.”

And then, while trying to blame Mr. Cicilline for Providence’s problems, Mr. Gemma notes the issue is across the urban core. So either Mr. Cicilline is part of a trend of RI’s urban areas doing poorly on tests (speaking to structural/environmental issues), or he’s responsible for all of the urban areas doing poorly. I’d say the biggest problem with Mr. Cicilline’s tenure over my schools is that the department would hire a bunch of people who aren’t in the schools but seem to have all the answers to show up for like two years, and then leave when a higher paying job opens up. No one deigns to ask the students what’s going wrong. And here’s the thing, students have identified all the problems in the day-to-day operation of their schools. They know just what’s going wrong for them. No one in power is asking teachers what problems they’re having (other teachers are).

Hopefully the collaboration between the teachers’ union and the administration in Providence will yield some results. If they engaged the students via any one (but hopefully all) of the great student organizations in Providence, the schools would probably see incredible improvements.

Cicilline Says Kids Need to Compete

A couple of masters in engineering help a lady out.

I hear this a lot, George W. Bush said it as he inaugurated No Child Left Behind, tons of people talk about the need for children to compete. And it’s stupid. Look, if you want future American workers to be competitive with kids in India and China, educating them more is not the way to go. Notice how no one ever says we have to have our compete with top-ranked nations for education like Finland or South Korea. It’s always Mexico, Indonesia, and China we have to struggle against. That’s because the most competitive workers are the ones who don’t know any better.

I mean, what’s the cheapest worker? A slave or a serf. No one ever heard a slave owner or a feudal lord go, “man, if only my peons were more educated. Then they’d be more competitive.” No. It was “keep those books away from them. If they get too knowledgeable, they won’t know their place. No one wants to purchase an unruly worker.”

We used to understand this (ironically, back when there was actual slavery in this country’s living memory). We didn’t put public schools in place to produce workers. Horace Mann, the father of our public school system, wanted good American citizens. That’s the purpose of public education; to provide intelligent citizens. You know what doesn’t produce good citizens? Testing that demands that kids only know rote writing, reading, and math; and teaching that only supplies that. You want competitive workers, privatize and revert back to the past when only the wealthy got education. Then you’ll get people who don’t know any better but to take bad jobs at terrible wages.

You want good citizens who will build a strong America? Teach them how to think and question and argue and study. Teach them history and literature and philosophy and government and economics and science. Teach them how to be people, and not drones.

College Costs

Are you in debt? Yes? For that college education you got? Still? You mean, you didn’t graduate college and get that $40,000 a year job your college told you their average grad makes a year out of college? Weird. It’s almost like there’s terrible unemployment or something, and government no longer cares about full employment. Well, you can always go bankrupt. What? You can’t discharge your debt with bankruptcy? Good luck with that. When WPRI’s Ted Nesi asked this question to the candidates, they weren’t much help to the college student/graduate (full disclosure: I graduated college in debt).

Cicilline: Boy, That’s a Big Challenge

Damn right it is; college is where they teach both rocket science and brain surgery. Mr. Cicilline sure noted it was difficult, it would absolutely get more difficult much faster under Republican proposals, but he seemed mightily befuddled about how to solve the fact that over the last 30 years, the cost of college has risen 1120%. I suppose it’s worth noting that in 1980, Pell Grants covered 69% of a four-year, public university degree. In 2013, they’ll cover less than a third, a level of coverage that is the “lowest in history.” This despite their maximum amount being increased. Mr. Cicilline’s “that’s a difficult question, let’s have a conversation about this” approach doesn’t seem to me to signal the correct response to the immediacy of this problem. We could’ve talked about this in the late ’80s or early ’90s when the costs outstripped the Consumer Price Index. We should’ve been marshaling solutions in the early 2000s when it broke a 500% increase from 20 years before. But in 2012, we gotta say, “enough is enough, college costs are going to come down.” If that’s more government investment, or government interference, or a debt jubilee, or whatever, it doesn’t matter. By any means necessary, we cannot have colleges creating a new cohort of debtors every year. Frankly, a college education is not worth the amount we are paying for it.

Harvard is well known for being frugal with its money.

Gemma: Race to the Top!

Faced with this, Mr. Gemma could only go with “benchmarking against other institutions.” When Mr. Nesi pointed out that Harvard University is the top ranked college in the world, and its costs are ludicrously high, Mr. Gemma said something like, “well, benchmark against savings on paper goods.” Paper goods. Seriously. You know where we could save a ton of money on a paper good? Ending the cartel of book publishers which keep textbooks outrageously high (your seventeenth edition of Econ 101 is not worth $500, by any measure).

Mr. Gemma pointed out Race to the Top as an example of a way to benchmark. Now, all due respect to President Obama, but Race to the Top is George W. Bush’s No Child Left Behind-lite. It’s privatize, privatize, privatize. And private colleges are the ones that are really getting outrageously expensive, as the amount (and salaries) of administrative positions bloat budgets and colleges focus on amenities rather than professors to attract wealthy students. And that’s not to even get into for-profit colleges, which offer often fraudulent degrees at prices far above any other higher education institutions. So in the face of increased costs from the private sector, Mr. Gemma would look to the private sector for solutions on cutting costs?


Claiborne Pell, we need you now, more than ever.

Gemma-Cicilline Debate: The Crowd Has No Rules


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Cicilline Interviewed At WPRI Debate
Cicilline Interviewed At WPRI Debate
Rep. David Cicilline cracks a smile as he takes questions from the press.

This debate was a pissing-match. But not between the candidates. Rather, their supporters, gathered together in a room, attempted to dominate one another by shouting out “liar” when either candidate spoke, booing, chanting their candidate’s name, etc.

For those sitting in the room trying to listen, it made for an unpleasant evening trying to hear their candidates over the shouting. I gather that at home, it was a more enjoyable experience (if you find debates enjoyable).

I question the decision (I assume by The Journal) to put Edward Achorn on the panel, which seems to be the wrong kind of person to put on a Democratic Party debate. Perhaps a Democrat might’ve been better suited to ask Democrats questions. That said, I can see the other side, which is that any Democrat would’ve been compromised in their support, and a right-winger is unlikely to care either way (personally, I think there are enough disaffected Democrats who dislike both candidates to find one willing to ask fair questions).

David Cicilline won this debate, but not as strongly as he should’ve. Without the hour spread out over four candidates, Anthony Gemma was without a doubt an opposition candidate. But not an ideal one. Mr. Gemma was unable to name a single policy or vote of Mr. Cicilline’s that he would’ve done differently, nor was he able to remember the name of a Republican he admired (someone from Texas who does legislation around breast cancer).

Interestingly, Mr. Gemma’s most forceful attack on Mr. Cicilline’s time as Mayor of Providence appeared to be attacking the stewardship of the education system. He also proposed that a program similar to “Race to the Top” be instituted to reduce higher education costs. He was short on specifics, but so was Mr. Cicilline, who said it was a difficult issue.

There were a couple of questions that seemed like neither candidate did well. For instance, when asked about what specifically they would cut, neither candidate came out in favor of massive defense spending cuts; even though a May 2012 poll by the Program for Public Consultation found that on average, 76% of Americans favored a 23% defense spending cut. Mr. Cicilline made a decent point about tax expenditures being spending rather than revenue, but he wasn’t able to name a specific tax expenditure other than the 40 billion in oil tax credits.

Both candidates seemed not too far apart on Iran (do everything possible to prevent war, then go to war). It would’ve been nice if a discussion of Syria had come up, since that conflict doesn’t offer the easy answer of “we have to stop nuclear weapons proliferation.” A real divisive issue was the USPS. Mr. Gemma took the businessman strategy: “streamline” the agency, and cut Saturday service. Mr. Cicilline attacked the laws that force the USPS to pre-fund their pension system, which puts it at a disadvantage with its private-sector competitors.

Oddly, a question on extending the terms of U.S. Representatives raised two viewpoints which were completely valid. Mr. Gemma chose the term-limits argument (cribbing from Bill Lynch’s playbook from the 2010 primary). Mr. Cicilline chose the campaign finance reform argument. Mr. Gemma’s viewpoint aligns with that of Jack Abramoff, who recommends it as a way to prevent the kind of corruption he was convicted as. And campaign finance reform was a bipartisan solution up until the moment Republicans decided they didn’t like it (plus it’s the right thing to do). Mr. Cicilline said exactly the right line in talking about this: “corporations are not people.” Mr. Gemma wasn’t as convincing trying to thread the needle on the need for term limits, yet acknowledging the implication is that good Congress people will be thrown out.

In fairness to Mr. Gemma, I thought it was wrong of the moderator Tim White to push on him for making RI-specific proposals that seem irrelevant to the U.S. House when one question asked specifically about who in the state deserves blame for 38 Studios (neither candidate blamed anyone specific), and another asked to grade Lincoln Chafee for no apparent reason (Mr. Cicilline refused to answer saying he wouldn’t grade anyone he had a working relationship with, Mr. Gemma said “C”). That said, Mr. Gemma does need to be pushed on it, because it’s stupid.

Finally voter fraud. For the crowd, this was the issue to intervene in. There isn’t much to say here. Either you believe Mr. Gemma or you think he’s a liar. Moderator Tim White eventually cut Mr. Gemma’s explanation of the issue short, saying that Mr. Gemma was still failing to provide actual evidence. We learned that Mr. Gemma has spent about $40,000 in campaign cash on his investigation of Mr. Cicilline. Mr. Cicilline eventually waggled his finger in Mr. Gemma’s face, saying that Mr. Gemma was not focusing on the correct issue at hand, instead talking about people holed up in their attics.

And that’s ultimately where the candidates differed. Mr. Cicilline returned numerous times to arguing against the Republican plan for America. Mr. Gemma remained focused on voter fraud and conspiratorial election-rigging, neglecting the Providence attack line that really worries voters, and makes even Mr. Cicilline’s supporters worried about his prospects in November.

But Mr. Cicilline never turned Mr. Gemma’s own talking points against him; he never said something like “how can Mr. Gemma talk about trust and integrity when he’s lying to Rhode Islanders about voter fraud and inflating his social media presence?”

Perhaps that was intentional; Mr. Cicilline’s focus on defeating the Republican Party led to two moments where he trumped Mr. Gemma. Mr. Cicilline would remain loyal to the Democratic candidate, even if his opponent who had so smeared him won; and Mr. Cicilline also admired the respect and honor Mr. Gemma has shown to his mother through the Gloria Gemma Foundation. In comparison, Mr. Gemma only like Mr. Cicilline’s tie, and would not vote for Mr. Cicilline.

I think the WPRI poll was more important to the coverage of this race than this debate.

Notes:

  • No handshake between the candidates.
  • Sorry I only got a picture of Mr. Cicilline. Mr. Gemma left before I could snap a photo with my iPhone camera.
  • I hope that the WPRI employee who was carried off the stage is okay.

Unsubstantiated Allegations


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Anthony Gemma on his way to announce … unsubstantiated allegations. (Photo by Bob Plain)

After all that hype, there was nothing particularly game-changing about Anthony Gemma’s announcement that he found some people willing to accuse his political opponent of voter fraud. There wasn’t even anything substantiated.

I would imagine most candidates could dig up similar accusations regardless of whom their opposition is. The difference is most know not to stake their entire candidacy on unsubstantiated allegations. Gemma, though, seemingly doesn’t even realize he’s doing that! Either that or he doesn’t mind blatantly lying the the people’s faces.

“I’ll close my remarks today by answering before it’s asked what I suspect will be your first question,” he said according to a transcript of his remarks. “In my opinion, have I presented today smoking gun evidence that David Cicilline has committed criminal acts relating to voter fraud? My answer, based upon the results to date of the ongoing TPS investigation is a resound yes.”

His smoking gun? He presented what he called “sworn testimony” from five individuals. By sworn testimony what he meant was something someone told a lawyer. I’m pretty certain in most people’s minds telling a lawyer something, even under oath, is a far cry from a smoking gun.

Gemma said he has known about the allegations since 2010, but was unable to come up with a coherent reason for why he waited two years to disclose them. Keep in mind, the primary between he and Cicilline is 20 days away.

Gemma also said this wasn’t about his campaign but was about protecting the process. But again, he was unable to come up with a coherent reason why he didn’t respect the wishes of law enforcement and wait until the investigation played out – as he admitted they asked him to do. Again, remember, 20 days until the primary.

And despite defying authorities, he had the nerve to say, “I am obliged by conscience to protect the integrity of ongoing criminal investigations being conducted and/or contemplated by federal and state law enforcement authorities.”

What? He didn’t respect the integrity of anything! Not any potential criminal investigation and certainly not the electoral process.  Did you pick up on the word “contemplated” in that statement. Not even Gemma will confirm that an investigation is ongoing.

Even his fellow Democrats – though there is hardly any more evidence that Gemma is a Democrat than there is that he has uncovered any real evidence of actual voter fraud – are imploring him to give up the gamesmanship.

“In short, Mr. Gemma’s approach to this matter has been highly irresponsible,” said Edwin Pacheco, head of the state Democrats. “This race is too important. I am calling on Mr. Gemma to return to the issues and put the theatrics aside. In his own words, he has stated that law enforcement authorities have asked him not to discuss this matter. Instead, for his own political gain, Mr. Gemma is attempting to tear down Congressman Cicilline by linking him to these accusations.  A link he was unable to make. As an attorney, Mr. Gemma should know it is highly irresponsible to cast unsubstantiated accusations without providing supporting documentation. The voters of Rhode Island deserve more than campaign antics, they deserve solutions to the real problems they are facing every day.”

In short, the only way Gemmapalooza will change the game is that he probably lost whatever shred of credibility he has left.

All this isn’t to say that nothing will come of Gemma’s broad accusations, and I very much look forward to following all the fallout from today’s events. But nothing that happened today would indicate it will be tied to David Cicilline, and everything indicates that Gemma is a rogue actor and loose cannon who should never be elected to so much as a neighborhood association, never mind Congress.

The Brendan Doherty, Paul Ryan Relationship


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Brendan Doherty praising Paul Ryan

Earlier this month, Bill Fischer, spokesman for the Rhode Island Democratic party, prophetically said in a statement to the press: “Paul Ryan may not be a household name to everyone in Rhode Island, but if you’re a senior citizen who relies on Medicare, you should know who he is and what he stands for, because these are the types of Republicans Brendan will be standing with and voting with, if elected to Congress.”

Well now that Paul Ryan is a household name, time will tell whom he proves to better benefit as a vice presidential candidate: Mitt Romney or President Obama. But his selection is certainly not going to help Brendan Doherty. The conservative-thinking, political newcomer is trying to parse himself as a moderate. But he’s has already suffered some from his close relationship with Ryan.

In May, Doherty told a Tea Party group in the East Bay that he supported Paul Ryan and his Medicare-cutting budget proposal. “I had a great opportunity to meet with Paul Ryan about a month ago and that’s his position and he’s digging his feet in and I applaud him for that and I support him,” Doherty said.

Later on the trail, Doherty said he wouldn’t vote to cut Medicare. But Paul Ryan donates to Doherty’s campaign and he *really wants to cut Medicare. “Furthermore, Mr. Doherty has gladly accepted $5,000 in campaign contributions from Mr. Ryan’s Prosperity PAC, further proof that Rhode Island’s seniors cannot trust Brendan Doherty to protect Medicare,” Fischer said in early August.

Perhaps this is why RIPR political reporter Ian Donnis said Doherty “walks a fine line in backing Romney’s pick of Paul Ryan.” (At least, I assume Ian writes his own headlines) in his statement on the selection.

Indeed, Doherty practically cops to the fact that Ryan is one of Washington’s most polarizing power players: “I do not believe that one political party is good and the other is bad. I do not believe that one party is for the middle class and the other is against it. I will focus on ideas that are formed through the cooperation of like-minded leaders from both parties, and those leaders then build consensus on both sides of the aisle.”

Great. If it’s true. But because Doherty is a political novice we have no idea what he will do if he ever gets elected to office. We know just since running for office he has changed what he thinks – or says – about Paul Ryan’s extremist budget proposal, among other issues.

Gemma, Doherty Both Caught by WPRI


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

WPRI has been particularly tough on Congressman David Cicilline so far this campaign season, but recently the TV station has spread around its journalistic efforts to his opponents as well.

First, there was Anthony Gemma, Cicilline’s opponent in the Democratic Primary. Despite trumpeting the need to create more jobs here, it turns out the businesses rather than ones here in Rhode Island. Someone should tell Gemma that the world’s best jobs plan, let alone his, isn’t going to bolster the economy if we don’t spend our money here.

Then, a Brendan Doherty suppoter got caught – on video, I might add – trying to spy on Cicilline. The young man called and asked for some campaign information. Unfortunately, he called from Doherty headquarters so Cicilline staffers knew to get him on film when he arrived. Here’s the video:

Worst part is that the kid got suspended from the campaign for a few days, as if he went rogue and the campaign didn’t know he was going over there. That’s almost as far fetched as Gemma’s jobs plan.

Politico Shows Why RI Future Matters


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Anthony Gemma

Anthony GemmaSo, Politico’s Steve Friess published a story today about a phenomenon about the Gemma campaign I pointed out on March 20th. I’ve sworn off on saying anything more about Mr. Gemma, I’ll let other writers for RI Future and the rest of Rhode Island’s chattering class cover it

I also want to take the time to give credit elsewhere; I didn’t discover these social media oddities, a friend’s friend did, and I was alerted about it and went digging. Luckily RI Future’s editor, Bob Plain, had already been looking into it as well and provided me the screen shots and the other information he had. It’s a testament to him that he let me run with it.

That highlights that even our master strokes tend to come from elsewhere. Mr. Friess’ story is a brilliant piece of work, taking from my initial piece to picking up on WPRI’s Ted Nesi’s July 19th piece about the now-abandoned Twitter handle @gemma4congress. Mr. Friess has access to social media research that I simply didn’t on March 20th, and couldn’t access today. Now, as a result of the Politico piece, RIPR and even the The Providence Journal has covered the action (in fairness, their PoliFact RI arm had looked into issues about Mr. Gemma’s LinkedIn account last election cycle).

What bothers me is that it took so long for local media like The Journal to pick up on this story. We broke this in March, The Phoenix‘s Phillipe and Jorge mentioned it, WPRO’s Dan Yorke talked with Bob about it soon after, and then nothing until Mr. Nesi got tweeted at by whatever script was operating @gemma4congress (though Twitter was a bit more alive about it in March, if my recollections are correct). Perhaps it was the tone of my piece, or perhaps because Mr. Gemma had not made an official announcement at that point. Perhaps because I was willing to give Twitter the benefit of the doubt then.

Regardless, we broke this in March. It is July now. That’s the kind of news you can expect from RI Future. We cannot be everywhere. None of us get paid to do this. We’re the news that lives like you. Yet what we get is important, it matters. That same ability is going to be applied to the primaries and the general election. It’s going to be applied to races for the General Assembly. We face a lack of resources (I, for instance, commute to work by foot). Yet what we bring you will be strong.

I lacked the ability to take this story all the way; Mr. Nesi pushed it forward, and then Mr. Friess got it to where it is today (by not only providing social media research on Mr. Gemma alone, but doing the due diligence that an amateur like myself wouldn’t think of and looking into the surrounding organizations). It’s great when a small outfit like ours can toss the ball to a stronger outfit and then it gets passed to an even stronger one that can score big, like in a rugby game. Granted, I would’ve loved to have this all in March. But I also would’ve loved if this had happened sooner. It’s 4 months from March to July. RI media could’ve been on this without Politico showing us the way.

But perhaps the timing wasn’t right in March, coming as it did during a news lull; in contrast, shortly after Mr. Nesi mentioned his Twitter run-in with @gemma4congress, news broke about Mitt Romney having suspiciously inflated Twitter numbers. Perhaps that’s what finally made this matter. Oh well, next time, RI media, next time.

Gemma’s Flip-flop Speaks to Broader Problem


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Anthony Gemma

Anthony GemmaAfter taking a lot of heat for refusing to back fellow Democrats in a recent interview with Buddy Cianci, Anthony Gemma has reversed his position and now says he will support Senator Whitehouse and Congressman Langevin in the general election, although he still won’t support Cicilline if he happens to win the primary.

In the interview, Gemma refused to support Sheldon Whitehouse because, in Gemma’s words, Whitehouse “has not done what’s right for me.” Essentially, because Whitehouse is supporting Cicilline, Gemma refused to support him. Edited highlights of the interview can be seen here:

This rejection of his party prompted a flurry of condemnations from fellow Democrats. The former occupant of the seat, Representative Patrick Kennedy called Gemma’s statements “deeply disappointing.” Buckling under the pressure, Gemma backed down. Campaign spokesman Alex Morash announced that Gemma would vote for Whitehouse and support Langevin. However, Gemma has yet to retract his refusal to vote for David Cicilline if he winds up winning the primary.

This episode may be part of a broader problem for Gemma. Even with friendly audiences, he does not interview well. Buddy Cianci is hardly a fan of Cicilline or Whitehouse. In fact, he made fun of their names during the interview. Cianci started the interview very friendly to Gemma, but Gemma was so evasive in handling questioning that by the end Cianci was complaining that getting answers out of him was “like pulling teeth.” The full interview can be viewed here.

I had a similar experience when I interviewed Gemma in June. After refusing to answer a number of relatively simple questions—like whether he supports single-payer healthcare—Gemma wound up saying this about intervening before Pearl Harbor to stop the holocaust:

To put it mildly, this is probably not the best thing to say when you are being interviewed by a Jew, especially one whose great-grandfather narrowly escaped being sent off to the concentration camps well before Pearl Harbor. To be fair to Gemma, who has not apologized to Rhode Island’s Jewish community for his comments, I am willing to believe that he is not actually anti-semitic. Instead, he may just be a weak interviewer who winds up saying things he later regrets.

The DCCC Is Doing Its Job


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Brendan Doherty

So, on Sunday GoLocalProv ran a story entitled “Democratic Attack Book Against Brendan Doherty Revealed.” There was also a slideshow of accompanying bits from the “attack book.” Essentially, the story is that the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (the Democratic Party organ which works to get Democrats elected to the U.S. House of Representatives) has a book of opposition research on Brendan Doherty.

The GoLocal stories utilized an image of a file labelled “Top Secret” making it seem as though this document was slipped to GoLocal and thus dragged kicking and screaming from the shadows. Lost was who was doing the revealing: the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.

Yes, that’s right, the Democratic Party is making its opposition research publicly available. Now, from a strategic point of view, it might be considered a point of idiocy that the Democrats are tipping their hand in such a manner (GoLocal quotes Mr. Doherty’s campaign manager Ian Prior as having “been aware of the document for several months”). On the other hand, it might be that the DCCC simply wants to distribute these as far as possible instead of keeping it for a few party insiders.

In all fairness to Dan McGowan, the reporter who wrote the story, his article is actually a fine overview of what’s in the document. Its flaws are that it omits saying that the DCCC made the document available (though Mr. McGowan does link to the actual site) and the misleading headline and picture.* And that’s really what gets me here. The DCCC wasn’t making this a secret. If the headline had been a simpler “DCCC Publishes Opposition Research on Brendan Doherty” it not only would’ve been clearer, but it would’ve been less misleading (assuming the “Top Secret” images were removed as well).

Instead, what’s “revealed” is that the DCCC is working as it’s supposed to. I don’t know, maybe this is the kind of stuff that raises Republican hackles; such as Providence Republican Committee Chair Tara Pinsky freaking out in a letter to The Journal about David Cicilline’s campaign conducting opposition research (file that under “101 Reasons Republicans Are Losing in Providence). But every time I read this stuff, I think, “do they not know how this works?”

Anyhow, it’s the height of hypocrisy for Republicans to get worked up over this. After all, the DCCC’s Republican counterpart, the National Republican Congressional Committee notably doesn’t openly publish its opposition research (though its “Race of The Day” feature does publish attack articles).

Favorite bit of Mr. McGowan’s article? When Mr. Prior warns anyone using the book to verify its facts; something the DCCC book itself does on its first page!

___________________________

UPDATE: This article has been changed to reflect that in the GoLocalProv article that the DCCC site is linked to, and language has been clarified.

Projo Misses News at Doherty, Brown Event


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Photo courtesy of Pat Crowley. @PatCrowleyNEARI

So, if you still have doubts that the ProJo editorial board is the tail wagging the newsroom’s dog; those fears should be laid to rest after the Newspaper Spin Cycle of record’s coverage of the Brendan Doherty event at Metacomet Country Club in East Providence.

Journal scribe Phil Marcelo, covered all the political details about how Sen. Scott Brown made the trip down from Massachusetts, gave a closed-door speech to the big donors and then left quickly. He also covered the fact of the approximate amount of money the event raised and even mentioned how both men met as youngsters at a basketball camp. Marcelo also goes on to note how Doherty was impressed with Brown’s call for bipartisanship.

Now here’s where I take exception to the ProJo’s coverage. When a story mentions bipartisanship, shouldn’t it at least include some of what the other side might have to offer, or object to? Maybe an example of Sen. Brown working in a cooperative manner?

Not only was there no mention of the other side’s views in this story, there wasn’t even any mention of the protesters outside the entrance to the country club. Members of Planned Parenthood and several labor groups were outside the event to make attendees and passers-by aware of extreme right-wing positions Mr. Doherty has staked out for his campaign. My question is: How is this not news?

Maybe if the ProJo goes back to fairly and accurately reporting the news and keeping its opinions on the editorial page, the paper can gain back some of its credibility. If not, I fear for my former co-workers on Fountain Street, as readership declines and the state will lose a once Pulitzer Prize-winning newspaper, to be replaced by a print version of Fox News.

Anthony Gemma Should Stay In CD1 Race


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Anthony Gemma

Anthony GemmaI’m going to go out on a limb here and argue against our editor Bob Plain’s article that Anthony Gemma should drop out of the race for Democratic nominee for Congressional District 1. Now, obviously, it’s not because I have any particular love for Mr. Gemma. It’s because I’m a radical democrat.

I believe in the application of democracy, that our ideas and politicians have to be challenged in order to strengthen them. Representative David Cicilline shouldn’t get a free ride (though, obviously, no one can really accuse him of that since Providence Mayor Angel Taveras announced a “category 5 hurricane” about the city’s finances). I think that, regardless of how much I personally feel that between Mr. Cicilline and Mr. Gemma that Mr. Cicilline is clearly the better candidate, Mr. Gemma needs to stay in the race.

This should apply to everyone. In our democracy, it’s a shame that anyone ever stands in any election unchallenged. I’m not deaf to the idea that sometimes the best candidate is already in office, but I sincerely doubt it always applies. Everyone needs to be capable of defending their ideas; those who don’t tend to get sloppy. Even worse, they can get entitled. Mr. Cicilline clearly never got the chance to feel entitled to his seat; when Mr. Taveras made his now famous remarks as to the city’s financial condition, the uphill battle began. Everyday since then has been a justification of why Mr. Cicilline should remain in office. That‘s a good thing. These telephone town halls, while pretty ubiquitous, have been a departure from Patrick Kennedy’s tenure when the representative was… someplace, talking to some people.

Mr. Gemma serves a purpose; to ask the question “can Mr. Cicilline serve as the Democratic Party’s standard-bearer for Representative in RI CD-1?” However terrible an instrument Mr. Gemma is for that purpose, we’ll know the answer on September 11th.

This principle should’ve extended to the Republican race as well. John Loughlin II dropping out was bad for Rhode Island. It denied Republicans the chance to vet their candidate. Hopefully, Michael Donahue can fill Mr. Loughlin’s shoes; although I sincerely doubt he will, with the twin issues of a dislike of lawyers & law enforcement and the Federal Reserve and a likely resources and media coverage deficit.

Today being filing day, it’s important that those who can go out and do as Rep. Teresa Tanzi (D-Narragansett, Peace Dale, Wakefield) told the audience to do at Netroots Nation: run for office. To make democracy work, we have to run, no matter how impossible the task seems.

That said, I want to lay out the problems to this. First, and foremost, it’s an incredible drain on resources; financial, physical, and emotional. People burn out, or they go bankrupt. Politics is exceedingly expensive. In a perfect world, we’d have public financing and everyone would work with similar resources. But the U.S. Supreme Court seems to be against that, so we have to deal with the fact that our elections are going to become more and more oligarchical. I don’t have the solution to that.

There’s also the grueling personal attacks. I’d love it if political campaigns were cordial affairs (what if candidates campaigned together?), but I recognize that they’re not. And the result is that they can be bitter, wounding attacks. This is because it’s far simpler to make personal attacks, because people connect more easily with emotional appeals, and because we have a news media which rewards the personal attack with coverage and a general blasé attitude. We shouldn’t deny it; the first hardcore “issues” article I read about the CD1 campaign was the Progressive Democrats presentations/questionnaires that both Mr. Cicilline and Mr. Gemma went through. And I’m jealous of our former editor Brian Hull (and the Progressive Dems) for getting it.

Furthermore, more and more candidates in a single race means our first-past-the-post system reveals its inherent flaw: it doesn’t take a majority to win. You only have the win the largest plurality. Which means elections can end with a candidate the majority of people actually don’t like winning. A simple reform would be to switch to instant runoff voting, but it’ll take a sustained campaign and a real threat that the RI Democratic Party might lose its grip for that switch to happen.

But even without changes in how we organize elections and how we cover them, we need candidates to be brave enough to stand up and speak out for what they believe in. We need them to argue with whatever assumptions currently stand; with the consensus. The consensus shouldn’t get to rest on its laurels, it should constantly have to strive to prove its worth. Ideally, Rhode Island should thrive on this sort of idea.

In some places, there’s an option for “none of the above”. Voters can reject all the candidates by selecting it; and it means that a new election is called with new candidates. Perhaps that’d be a more honest way of doing this; giving voters the chance to say “all of these options are unappealing to me.” But until that comes along, that’s what Anthony Gemma will be: an alternative to “none of the above”.

Anthony Gemma Should Drop Out of CD1 Race


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Anthony Gemma

Anthony GemmaThe campaign to represent Rhode Island’s first congressional district in Washington DC will surely be the most interesting and scrutinized local race this year and, so far, there is only one thing that is certain: Anthony Gemma won’t win.

He could, however, potentially damage David Cicilline enough in an ugly primary to leave the incumbent vulnerable to the real challenger, Republican Brendan Doherty. But he won’t win. Not even the primary. No way. Not gonna happen. No chance.

First off, Gemma has absolutely no institutional support, which is crucial in a primary. At Friday’s annual local Democratic Convention, his nomination didn’t even garner a second, reports Will Collette in an excellent piece on the event in Progressive Charlestown. Collette writes:

When it came time for nominations, one delegate, who said she grew up as a friend of Gemma’s back in the day, stood to put his name in nomination. When Party Chair Ed Pachecho asked, not once but three times, if  any delegate would second the nomination, not one delegate among the 200+ would do so.

That leaves me to wonder how Gemma can claim to be the only electable Democrat for the First Congressional District when he can’t organize up a second to his nomination among 200+ Democrats. His supporters yelled out “democracy, democracy” when his nomination failed for lack of a second, but minutes later, they all filed out of the room.

But it’s more than just Gemma’s lack of support that makes him a bad candidate; he’s also just a bad candidate.

Last election, as a rookie, he ran as a pro-business fiscal moderate and this time he is claiming to be more progressive than his very progressive opponent – it paints the picture of a flip-flopper politically and at best an unknown variable on policy given that he’s never held office before, or even shown much interest in the process until a few years ago.

He’s also a pretty poor public speaker, a disaster at dealing with the local press pool and far less than adroit at answering questions on his feet. His latest gaffe was not taking a hardline on Nazi Germany in a recent interview with the RI Progressive Democrats.

Note to all pols: when asked about Hitler or the Nazis, it’s totally okay – if not a necessity of political survival, to throw them under the bus.

For these reasons as well as many others, we implore Anthony Gemma to drop out of the race. He cannot win; he can only do damage to the party he says he supports and, truth be told, he’s kind of embarrassing himself.

Which is too bad, because Gemma is a smart, super hard worker who is genuine and good and who wants to do right by his community. Electoral politics just doesn’t seem to be his bag.

I expect he’ll find more far more success if and when he starts some sort of local liberal think tank or online media venture – either would suit his skill set better than running for office, probably would have a greater impact on Rhode Island and could be done for a fraction of the cost. And, he’d get to be a hero rather than a spoiler.

RI Progressive Dems Endorse Cicilline


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Recently, the Rhode Island Progressive Democrats interviewed both of the candidates running in the Congressional District 1 Democratic primary race, incumbent Rep. David Cicilline and challenger Anthony Gemma.  Each candidate was asked the same questions and below are their video responses.  When the endorsement vote was taken, David Cicilline received the unanimous endorsement of the Rhode Island Progressive Democrats.  As you watch the videos, and read the summaries, you’ll understand why.

Cicilline is a well-polished candidate, being in public service for roughly 15 years, first as a State Representative, then Mayor of Providence, and now as U.S. Congressman.  Gemma is not as well-polished and at times seems uncomfortable with the questions being asked.  While in some of the questions Gemma and Cicilline give similar and even identical responses. In virtually every set of questions Cicilline is the more progressive and forward-thinking candidate.

I commend the Rhode Island Progressive Democrats for the level of sophistication and detail embodied in these questions and  for really pushing the candidates to give detailed answers.  And with that….

Economy:

Cicilline:

Rep. Cicilline supports President Obama’s Jobs Act.  He states that America needs to rebuild its infrastructure and asserts that such an  effort will generate huge payoffs in the number of jobs due to the employment of construction workers and in the supply of goods and services that are required to rebuild America.  He envisions a modern day version of the WPA.  He has co-sponsored the National Infrastructure Bank legislation and feels there has never been a better time than now to borrow money and get this done due to historically low rates.

Secondly, the country needs to reinvigorate American manufacturing and expand on the great base that exists in the US by putting in place policies that actually support the manufacture of American-made goods rather than incentivizing the offshoring of American manufacturing overseas.  In Congress he has introduced a set of bills to “Make it in America.”  These include a national manufacturing strategy, legislation to address the manipulation of Chinese currency, and ending tax break to companies that ship jobs overseas.  Cicilline voted against trade agreements because they lacked the protections for American jobs, and while some labor- intensive manufacturing will never come back to America, many other types will return if the incentives to ship jobs overseas are removed.

Finally, the country’s small businesses need access to capital and a skilled workforce which require investments in training programs and education from Head Start through to Pell grants for post-secondary education.

To pay for much of this, the country needs to end the war in Afghanistan and redirect those funds to do “nation building” in America.  Business owners need customers with money to buy the goods and services that businesses produce, and the only way this will happen is with a strong and thriving middle class.

When asked about Stimulus Spending versus Deficit Reduction, Cicilline spoke to how austerity has severe consequences that are now playing themselves out everywhere.  In the short term, we need to make investments now to create jobs, combined with a long-term strategy to reduce the deficit in a balanced way by cutting spending and increasing revenue.  He also supports Quantitative Easing.

Gemma:

Gemma states that he is the only candidate who has created jobs in the private sector.  His jobs plan rests on several “pillars” including:

  • “Health and Wellness” industry: A high growth area in RI that includes the manufacturing of equipment and supplements.
  • “Education” as a path to creating jobs by increasing enrollment at the universities although he is unclear as to how he would convince the respective colleges to take in more students, admitting that he has not approached any of the colleges to discuss this aspect of his plan.  Students spend lots of money locally, so having more students enrolled should equal more money spent locally.
  • Alternative energy and green industry
  • Advanced manufacturing
  • Travel and tourism
  • Infrastructure

Gemma states that his plan will create at least 10,000 jobs in RI over five years at the low end, but he thinks it could be as high as 30-40,000 jobs.  He also assumes that much of the funding will come from foundations and private money since Congress is resolute in not investing in job creation.  Many of his proposals assume things that may not actually be possible however, such as increasing enrollment at Brown University by 10,000 students, and not contacting Brown University about this.

When asked about Stimulus Spending versus Deficit Reduction, Gemma’s #1 priority would be to reduce the deficit, using a balanced approach of tax increases and earned benefit cuts.  When asked about Quantitative Easing, he said it is ok, although he is concerned about the inflationary effects of printing more money (although inflation is at super low rates).

Healthcare:

Cicilline:

Cicilline believes that everyone should have access to quality, affordable healthcare and references a public option and a single payer system as models that would ensure affordability and access.  The healthcare reform legislation includes components of a good system: enabling children to stay on parents’ plan until 27, no denial of pre-existing condition or monetary caps, etc.  The cost of healthcare, while important, is a systems question not a provision question.  In order to lower costs, however, the system should be able to negotiate prices with drug companies like the VA system can, and there should be investments in wellness and technology.  America cannot reduce the level of care and must ensure that everyone has access.  We pay for universal care now due to emergency room visits, but there is a much less expensive way to handle this through universal coverage.

Gemma:

Everyone should have HC, but affordability is the biggest issue.  As President of Gem Plumbing, insurance premium rates were growing rapidly, so he created a program call Benefits by Design that incentivized employees to be healthier and engage in preventative measures.  The current HC system is lacking in preventative measures.  We should incentivize people to be healthier and take responsibility for their own health. Gemma did not endorse a single payer system, although he states that he would have voted for healthcare reform and the public option had he been in Congress at the time.

Education:

Cicilline:

We need to be serious about investments in early childhood education as they are the best investments in children we can make in terms of educational outcomes.  We expend a lot more later on for remediation because of our failure to spend enough on the early years.  Invest early for every child in the country to maximize the return on investment for children’s learning.

Build a system that cares for children from when they wake up to when they go to sleep. They need a learning environment created to provide learning experiences outside of school.  Look at AfterZone and the PASA.  Kids need the support, especially those in households in which both parents are working, or parents are working multiple jobs, etc.

Charter schools have some great examples, but the innovative ideas are not being transplanted to the public school system, nor are charters held to the same standards.  Different learning environments are great for children, but the majority of children will be taught in public schools.  We cannot abdicate our public responsibility for teaching children.

Public money should never be spent on the private school system.  Public school choice presumes that parents have the same capacity and information about their child’s education, so the system will likely not work as theorized.  Rather, every public school should offer every child a high quality education.

The funding of school based on property taxes has created segregated school districts where the wealthiest areas have the greatest capacity to invest in their public schools compared to poor neighborhoods.  Ed quality should not be based on zip code.  A state funding system should help remove that inequality.

Gemma:

Every available dollar needs to be invested in public education.  Certain cities have failed their students and multiple generations due to underperforming school system.  Re-educate adults who cannot read and write and make them more productive members of society.  He believes in school choice for both public and private schools, funded by public money, and is supportive of Head Start and charter schools, claiming there are models that work. He cites the Mayor of Cumberland as a person who has a vision of education with which he agrees, although he doesn’t explain exactly what that means. He is also supportive of equal funding.

Taxation Policy:

Cicilline:

Raise enough revenue to do the things we need to do and those who have benefitted the most from this country should pay a proportionally larger share than those who earn the least.  He supports progressive taxation.  Growing inequality is exacerbated by taxation policy that taxes the wealthy less than other workers.  All income, however it is earned, should be treated equally rather than providing favoring tax rates for hedge fund managers and those who earn income by already having wealth, and taxing other workers at a higher rate.

Cicilline supports a financial transactions tax to limit the destabilizing speculation that occurs in financial markets and has cosponsored two bills to limit oil speculation.  Supports new tax brackets for higher earners.  Supports letting the “Bush Tax Cuts” now the Obama Tax Cuts expire for people earning over $250,000, although he feels there is some legitimate concern about those earning between $250,000 and $1 million that should be acknowledged.

Gemma:

Gemma believes that the tax cuts for those making above $100,000 should expire (this is roughly 20% of the CD1 population), while those making less than $100,000 should see their current tax rates maintained.  Additionally, Gemma feels that those making less than $50,000 should see their taxes decrease.  Capital gains should be divided into two “buckets.”  Bucket 1 = zero cap gains taxes for new business creation that exist for more than 3 years and which create jobs.  Bucket 2 = phased in capital gains taxes to higher pre-Bush tax cut level in order to limit disruption to stock market.  Gemma feels that oil speculation is a major problem, but his response to having a financial transactions tax is unclear.

Foreign Policy:

Cicilline:

Cicilline only supports military actions in foreign nations when it is necessary to protect the national interests and security of the people of America.  He is a strong advocate for ending the war in Afghanistan and did not support military action in Lybia.  Syria is a challenging question due to the slaughter of innocent people and human rights abuses.  America has some moral responsibility to take actions to protect human life, even though we cannot do it everywhere.  Ideally, the US as part of a global coalition, can play a role in preventing these types of abuses.  In the Sudan, the US should play a role, but we have not currently done so.

Drones change the way the military thinks about warfare.  When people went onto the battlefield, limits were placed on interventions.  The depersonalization of drone warfare impacts the frequency of it.  The decision made about when, and against whom, to use drones are difficult to reconcile with basic constitutional tenets.  There needs to be some oversight of President’s kill list so that the people who are targeted are actually intending to do harm to the US, although any system like this would be an imperfect system.  Cicilline opposes indefinite detention and believes the defense budget should be cut.

Gemma:

Gemma does not support interventions in Iraq and Lybia but does support military action in Afghanistan.  Syria is a deep concern, although he feels that we don’t know everything so much of this is speculation.  Gemma feels that military action should be a last resort.  He is opposed to indefinite detention.

Campaign Finance Reform:

Cicilline:

Rep. Cicilline is cosponsor of several bills aimed at reforming the way campaigns are financed.  The Disclose Act requires the identity of donors to Super PACs to be made almost immediately so people know who is behind campaign ads.  Cicilline cosponsored two constitutional amendments to overturn the Citizens United decision and does not believe that corporations are people.  He proposed legislation, the Fair Elections Act, which would create public financing model for campaigns.

Cicilline believes the biggest challenge facing America right now is the funding of elections, and if we want to fix any of the other problems, we’re talking about we need to address how campaigns are funded and by whom.  The influence of big money and secret money devastates our democracy.

Gemma:

Gemma supports an amendment to repeal Citizens United.  Gemma does not accept PAC money and has self-funded much of his campaign.  He believes there should be public funded campaigns so that more people can run.

Environment

Cicilline:

Rep. Cicilline believes that it is critical to protect the EPA so that it can enforce clean water and air regulations, make serious investments in clean renewable energy, and support local farmers.  He is opposed to the Keystone Pipeline, stating the very serious environmental concerns attached to the project, maintains that the jobs numbers are inflated, and that it is unlikely to reduce energy costs.  He points out that Republicans even defeated an amendment to ensure that the oil running through the pipeline would stay in the US.

Cicilline supports reinstating tax credits for renewable energy projects and extending them for longer periods of time so that there is more stability in the funding of long-term renewable energy projects. He suggests that we could eliminate the $40 billion in subsidies to oil companies and invest that money in renewable energy technology.  Cicilline believes that over time it may be possible to phase out nuclear energy if sufficient investments are made in the development of renewable energy technology.

He is skeptical of ethanol subsidies and supports labeling of genetically-modified foods and milk derived from cows injected with Recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone.

Gemma:

Gem Plumbing has invested in sustainable energy and personally, Gemma is passionate about the environment and sustainability.  Gemma believes the Keystone Pipeline project should move forward, as long as it has the correct environmental protections. To lessen burden on foreign oil overseas, he said, the US should import more oil from Canada.  He believes the dirty tar oil may be able to be burned cleaner.

Gemma supports reinstating tax credits for renewable energy projects, ethanol subsidies, and the labeling of genetically modified foods and milk derived from cows injected with Recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone.

Progressive Caucus:

Cicilline:

Rep. Cicilline will remain a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus.

Gemma:

Gemma would join the Congressional Progressive Caucus.

Spamthony Gemma: A Business Plan for RI

Spamthony Gemma

Greetings! My name is Spamthony Gemma. I’m running for Governor Congress because I have a scheme plan to create 10,000 jobs in Rhode Island. Rhode Island needs more businessmen like me, Mitt Romney, and Don Carcieri to get this state back on track.

Let me take a moment to present you with a business opportunity.

Low risk – High return – Work your own hours!

Now’s your chance to get into the recession proof spamming industry! I’ve been having great success in the spamming industry and I want you to get in on a piece of the action. Here’s how it works!

First, I will stop buying my 500,000+ facebook fans from 3rd party vendors and will begin hiring Rhode Islanders to create fake facebook profiles. You can then use your fake facebook profile(s) to spam your friends about useful things such as plumbing services (hint: toss in a few hundred inspirational quotes and photos). You can even take it to the next level and start spamming blogs like this one!

This is just the ground floor – there’s plenty of room to move on to bigger and better opportunitie$$$. Anyone can take advantage of these emerging trends of the 21st century! I hope you’ll join me so that we can get our state back on track – together.

P.S. Vote for me, Spamthony Gemma!

This is a satirical parody posted by a member of the RI Future community.

It’s a Showdown in CD1


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
(via Wikipedia)

Elections didn’t used to be this way in Rhode Island. If you ran for federal office and won, you were pretty much guaranteed an unassailable position from which to plot your next step in life; be that a higher federal office, a cabinet position, retirement, or death. In fact, for roughly three out of four of our federal officers, that’s still pretty much the case. But our newest addition to our federal delegation isn’t finding it so easy.

Yes, the latest news out of WPRI’s pollster Fleming & Associates is that incumbent U.S. Representative David Cicilline has a 4.3% lead among likely primary voters over challenger Anthony Gemma, with 19.9% of voters undecided. Rep. Cicilline triumphed with a 14.1% lead over Mr. Gemma and slightly larger leads over David Segal and Bill Lynch in 2010; a year that had older voters motivated in a right-wing backlash against Barack Obama and the Democratic Party.

The poll ultimately shows that Rep. Cicilline draws strong support from 18-39 year-olds, and has an advantage among female voters. It also shows that according to voters, his apology hasn’t had much impact or made them less likely to vote for him. However, the key issue that 45.7% of voters cared about was “Economy/Jobs”. “Providence Finances” came in fifth at 7.3%, behind “Best Chance to Win in November” (7.9%), “Experience” (11.3%) and “Character” (23.8%).

The good news for Rep. Cicilline is that his job approval ratings are higher among primary voters than the general electorate; in February, just 19.6% of registered voters said that Rep. Cicilline’s job performance was “Excellent” or “Good”. Among likely primary voters, that number is 32.1%. Not stunning, but not terrible either. And since 33.8% of voters rank his performance as “Fair” (whatever that means), there’s a cushion there.

The other good news, one that cuts both ways, is that Anthony Gemma remains an unknown quantity to most primary voters, 45.4% said they didn’t know enough to give him a favorability rating. Among those who did, 37.7% ranked him as “Very” or “Somewhat Favorable”. WPRI’s Joe Fleming points out that this allows Mr. Gemma to build himself up, or alternatively, allows Rep. Cicilline to tear him down.

Anthony GemmaMr. Gemma Trying To Ride Two Horses At Once

Mr. Gemma has had some serious issues already. Beyond the initial SNAFU when his announcement devolved into him abandoning it in an attempt to avoid the press, Mr. Gemma has been embroiled in trouble over whether he’d be a sore loser if he fails to triumph in the primary in September; and lingering questions of just how committed he is to the Democratic Party. After a meeting with the Democratic City and Town Committee Chairs Association, Mr. Gemma was blasted by Tiverton Democratic Town Committee chair Mike Burk, who claimed that Mr. Gemma would mount an independent campaign if he lost. Portsmouth Democratic Town Committee chair says that Mr. Gemma said he’d merely write his own name in.

But beyond the he-said, he-said of that particular exchange, Mr. Burk also claimed that Mr. Gemma’s 2012 campaign was reminiscent of his 2010 campaign, which sounded more like he was running for governor than for U.S. representative. Indeed, he’s promised 10,000 jobs to Rhode Island, a claim which sounds far-fetched even if he was running for governor, much less a junior representative in a party likely to be in the minority in the 113th Congress.

Also undercutting him is a problem of insincerity. Having claimed to be the progressive in the race, Mr. Gemma comes from a strong business background, one that was cited for 32 labor violations. He did not vote in the 2008 Democratic presidential primary (one of the closest presidential primary races in recent history), and only affiliated as a Democrat prior to his first run in 2010. He also has said that he is anti-abortion, but would not vote against a woman’s right to choose. Which doesn’t signal strong convictions more than it signals a willingness to do what’s necessary to get elected; a criticism Mr. Gemma has lobbed against Rep. Cicilline on more than one occasion.

Brendan Doherty Lies Waiting in the General

Regardless of which Democrat wins, they’ll run up against Republican Brendan Doherty. Between a WPRI Newsmakers interview where he came out in favor of letting all of the Bush tax cuts expire and a recent statement that he favored the reinstatement of Glass-Steagall to separate commercial and investment banks, Mr. Doherty now has an economic policy far to the left of many Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives. It should be noted he also has said he favors “right to work” legislation and that Rep. Cicilline has signed onto a bill to reinstate Glass-Steagall and supports ending the Bush tax cuts for those earning more thant $250,000 a year.

But Mr. Doherty’s statement on Glass-Steagall (repealed in the early 1990s under the neoliberal bonanza of the Clinton presidency) raises the specter of accusations during his primary campaign that he was merely a Republican-in-name-only, something which is not helped by Mr. Doherty also having a lead among unionized workers versus Rep. Cicilline in the last poll in which they were matched.

If the economy remains the number one issue for voters, Rhode Island’s Congressional District 1 may have a thunderous battle over economic policies that tilt towards the left if Mr. Cicilline makes it through. On the other hand, Democratic primary voters may face a more traditional interventionist vs. laissez-faire economic debate.

It used to be that federal office in Rhode Island was a secure perch. But even if Mr. Cicilline fails to survive this, his successor, imperfect as the leading two candidates for it are, may face a similar struggle in 2014.

Gemma Said He Wouldn’t Vote For Cicilline


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Anthony Gemma

Anthony GemmaAnthony Gemma says he running against Congressman David Cicilline to help keep the CD1 seat in the hands of the Democrats. But he also said that he wouldn’t vote for Cicilline in the general election if the incumbent beats him in the primary.

“I said in good consciousness I cannot support David Cicilline,” Gemma told me, recounting what he said Monday night at the endorsement meeting for the Rhode Island Association of Democratic City and Town Chairpersons.

After talking about it with me, Gemma softened his position, saying, “We’re in a political fight right now. On September 12, I will reassess my position.”

He added, My number one objective is to keep the seat Democratic. I will rally behind the Democratic party.”

But some at the Monday night meeting doubt that is really Gemma’s objective.

Leonard Katzman, the chairman of the Portsmouth Democratic Town Committee said Gemma told the group he would write in his own name rather than vote for Cicilline, a statement that made him question Gemma’s motives.
“His entire pitch is that he wants to ensure that the seat remains with the Democratic party,” Katzman said. “If he’s not willing to support the eventual nominee, that tells me he’s really not interested in keeping it with the Democrats.”
In an email sent out after the meeting, Mike Burk, chair of the Tiverton Democratic Town Committee, wrote that Gemma said he would run as an independent if he doesn’t win the primary, even if that helps the GOP retain control of the House of Representatives. Gemma refutes this allegation and says he has an audio recording of the meeting to prove it.

With Little Proof, Gemma Claims Progressive Mantle


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Anthony Gemma

Anthony GemmaThe Democratic primary between Congressman David Cicilline and challenger Anthony Gemma will likely be decided by Providence voters and progressives. As such, it should come as no surprise that Gemma is claiming the mantle of being the more liberal candidate in the contest.

“I’m every bit as progressive and as liberal as David Cicilline,” Gemma told me on Friday. “If progressives would look under the hood, they would see I’m their guy.”

He said he supports the DREAM Act, marriage equality and even decriminalization for small amounts of marijuana. He says he’s personally opposed to abortion, but promises to never vote against a women’s right to choose. On tax policy he talks like a progressive, calling the GOP House budget “draconian” and saying he the supports the Buffett Rule, rolling back Bush era tax cuts and even keeping in place estate taxes, though all in the name of lowering the deficit rather than investing in society for its own sake.

But Gemma, a businessman who grew his family plumbing empire into a multi-million dollar a year business and also ran a marketing and communications firm, can be hard to believe at times.

He’s also promised to create 10,000 jobs for Rhode Island in five years by bringing together public and private sector leaders to build upon a business plan he drafted for the 2010 campaign and is retooling for this one – it’s long on platitudes and short on policy proposals. Almost no one thinks such a lofty goal is a realistic campaign promise coming from someone who would be a rookie congressman, but Gemma confidently asserts he can use his team-building skills to get it done.

He’s never held public office, so he’s got no track record. And furthermore, he only registered as a Democrat a few short months before announcing his candidacy in 2010, and didn’t vote in the 2008 primary. He once donated to the campaign of conservative Republican Don Carcieri.

“I gave him a donation because I was running a business and he was definitely the pro-business candidate,” he said of Carcieri, though he said he didn’t vote for him and has never voted for a Republican.

Gemma said he supports organized labor “when unions support Rhode Island,” but again, his track record is at best, tarnished. Gem Plumbing was cited for 32 labor violations, which was “later reduced to six over the objection of the chief inspector,” according to the Associated Press, for hiring non-union plumbers when he was president of the company.

“I don’t recall exactly what happened because it was such a long time ago,” he said. “Our company was growing so fast at the time we my have made some mistakes along the way.”

Even his social networking success is suspect, a case RI Future first made in this piece: Gemma’s Suspicious Facebook Followers. He’s got more than 900,000 followers on Twitter and more than 100,000 friends on Facebook. But ask him how he amassed such a following, and he’s not talking.

“Strategically, there are ways in which to deal with social networking that I would like to write a book about,” he said. But added, “I choose not to talk about strategy during the campaign.”

He did say that it’s “certainly possible” that some of his Facebook and Twitter followers are not real people but said he has “never done the research to know how many are real and how many are fake.” When I asked if he paid for automated follows and Facebook friends he said, “Again, I’m not going to about strategy.”

So we’ll have to wait for the book to find out how he got more than 40,000 Facebook likes in one day, or why he has so many followers from Germany, Spain, Indonesia, and Dubai.

It’s not unlike how he invited reporters to a Sunday evening availability then declined to answer questions from them. Gemma seems to enjoy controlling the message, and one has to wonder if he’s doing that with his new-found fervor for progressive policy positions as well.

Democrats Send Progressives To Convention


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Logo for RI Democratic Party

Congratulations to the delegate candidates who won an opportunity to go to the Democratic National Convention in yesterday’s primary. While overall turnout may have been low, it seems as if progressives got out the vote as all but two of our endorsed candidates prevailed.

Anne Connor, whom we profiled, received more overall votes than former Providence Mayor Joe Paolino, who took out an ad in the ProJo (though he did spell the president’s name wrong in it). She even got more votes than him in his hometown of Providence – and she lives in suburban Barrington.

Conservative, anti-union Democrat Doug Gablinske received the fewest votes in CD1

In CD2, the three progressive members of the General Assembly – Josh Miller, Frank Ferri and Teresa Tanzi netted nearly 1,000 more overall votes than the three Weiner candidates, an affluent family from East Greenwich known for being political insiders and regulars at the party convention.

For a complete list of results, click here.

The winners are below, including total number of votes they garnered and percentage.

UPDATE: RI Future Publisher Emeritus Matt Jerzyk writes that our delegate results isn’t accurate because Democratic rules for the representing candidates at the convention employ a sort of affirmative action in which the top 5 men and top 6 women from each district are chosen. As such, these are the results according to Jerzyk:

The top 5 men and top 6 women in each CD are elected – not just the top 11.  That would mean the following won yesterday:

CD-1

  • Myrth YORK
  • Julie E. MEYERS
  • Anne W. CONNOR
  • Joseph R. PAOLINO, JR.
  • Onna A. MONIZ-JOHN
  • Mary A. GASBARRO
  • June S. SPEAKMAN
  • Brett P. SMILEY
  • Tom CODERRE
  • Gerald Pedro CARVALHO
  • David A. SALVATORE

CD-2

  • Joshua MILLER
  • Patrick T. FOGARTY
  • Teresa TANZI
  • Frank G. FERRI
  • Elaine PRIOR
  • Michael A. SOLOMON
  • L. Susan WEINER
  • Mark S. WEINER
  • Elisa M. POLLARD
  • Helen S. TAYLOR
  • Zoe I. WEINER

CD1

Myrth YORK 2831 10.4%
Julie E. MEYERS 2153 7.9%
Anne W. CONNOR 2061 7.6%
Joseph R. PAOLINO, JR. 1986 7.3%
Onna A. MONIZ-JOHN 1880 6.9%
Mary A. GASBARRO 1833 6.7%
June S. SPEAKMAN 1776 6.5%
Brett P. SMILEY 1763 6.5%
Rebecca Kim MEARS 1694 6.2%
Tom CODERRE 1640 6.0%
Gerald Pedro CARVALHO 1369 5.0%

CD2

Joshua MILLER 1313 7.8%
Patrick T. FOGARTY 1272 7.6%
Teresa TANZI 1233 7.3%
Frank G. FERRI 1137 6.8%
Elaine PRIOR 1131 6.7%
Michael A. SOLOMON 1109 6.6%
L. Susan WEINER 1033 6.1%
Mark S. WEINER 1007 6.0%
Thomas J. IZZO 990 5.9%
Ryan Patrick KELLEY 986 5.9%
Elisa M. POLLARD 972 5.8%

Poor Portents in Prospect Park for Anthony Gemma


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Prospect Terrace Park (via Wikipedia)

Having attended Anthony Gemma’s news statement in Providence’s Prospect Terrace Park, I’ll say this right off the bat: I went expecting a more polished candidate than appeared in 2010. I was disappointed.

Let’s get to the big part of it right away: fleeing the conference almost as soon as he was done. By 6:21 pm Mr. Gemma was gone from an event that had started at six o’clock. Many of his supporters had not even gotten to meet the man. He briefly took a photo with a small child, then shook hands with some of Providence’s local politicians before hopping into his SUV and driving off.

This accomplished one thing: it pissed off the media. One veteran reporter said she’d never seen never seen any politician behave that way at a campaign event in nearly two decades of reporting. The moment he stepped into that tinted-window truck, Mr. Gemma had given up two opportunities; winning over reporters and schmoozing with his own supporters. These were people who turned out at 6:00 pm on a Sunday for him; when most are eating with their families. The least he could’ve done was say hello to as many as he could. If that meant taking questions from reporters, well, so be it. That’s being a politician.

Mr. Gemma needs the press more than they need him. For instance, his primary opponent, sitting U.S. Congressman David Cicilline, has actually reached out to the press, inviting WPRI’s “Newsmakers” to enter his home to interview him. He also issues posts on this website.

In 2010, Mr. Gemma won only 23.1% of the vote in the Democratic primary, merely 3% over his nearest rival, David Segal, who had less money to spend. Now that Mr. Cicilline has begun apologizing very publicly for saying Providence was in “excellent fiscal condition” during his last campaign, it’s likely that Segal voters will be keener to jump to Mr. Cicilline’s defense, rather than staying home. Without press coverage, Mr. Gemma loses much of the ability to get out his message other than through advertising. And without making friends of the press, Mr. Gemma makes it that much more difficult to garner positive coverage.

Mr. Gemma was clearly attempting to set himself up as the frontrunner in this race on Sunday. He attacked Brendan Doherty by name, and never explicitly mentioned David Cicilline. I’d say it’s wise for Mr. Gemma not to attack Mr. Cicilline while he’s apologizing (it makes you look like a bully) but Mr. Gemma did make veiled reference to Mr. Cicilline’s apology by attacking it as something he wouldn’t do, completely negating that strategy.

What seems reasonably intelligent is the collection of Providence politicians Mr. Gemma’s gathered; John Lombardi, Davian Sanchez, Wilbur Jennings… though all are problematic. Providence will play a major part in this race. Last time, nearly a quarter of all of David Cicilline’s votes came from Providence. Mr. Gemma placed a distant third in the capital city. Both candidates have to walk a tight path here: Mr. Cicilline’s fate is tied to Providence’s, in many ways. But Mr. Gemma cannot blast the city without alienating its voters, many of whom proudly voted for David Cicilline, some of them twice.

Rep. John Paul Kvale (Farmer-Labor—MN), who once held the deciding vote in the U.S. House.

Beyond that, the clear lack of specifics and the empty rhetoric in the speech betrayed a problematic candidate. Mr. Gemma was the “quirky” candidate in the race last time, sounding like he was running for Governor rather than U.S. Congressman. Let’s be clear: the “control of the House may come down to one seat” argument is unconvincing. It’s only happened once before: in the 72nd Congress when 19 representatives-elect died before taking office and 14 flipped to the Democrats, leaving a sole Farmer-Labor Party member as the deciding vote. This seems unlikely to happen again. However, Mr. Gemma immediately undercut the notion of being a strong Democrat by saying he was willing to buck his party on certain issues.

Mr. Gemma had some intelligent moments. He focused on jobs, though he just said he knew how to create them. But smartest of all, he avoided divisive social issues where he could easily lose support among Democratic partisans. However, since issues like reproductive rights are about to enter center stage in Rhode Island, he must find a way to prevent himself from being lumped into the same category as Brendan Doherty in Democratic minds.

Given both his inability to work the crowd and press, and his occasional stumbles during his speech, Mr. Gemma is clearly an imperfect candidate. Perhaps he has a touch of stage fright. He does not win the award for “most improved” since 2010. That doesn’t go to anyone. There were dark clouds hanging over the Park as Mr. Gemma made his announcement. There’s a dark cloud hanging over this whole race. Democrats should be very worried. Both their candidates are flawed, deeply, but in different ways. Republicans now have their greatest chance to take one of the most liberal districts in the country.

The Chafee Endorsement Matters For Cicilline


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Governor Lincoln Chafee (Independent)

The big political news of the yesterday was Governor Lincoln Chafee’s endorsement of U.S. Representative David Cicilline for Congress in 2012. First, Chris Fierro of Mr. Cicilline’s office tweeted last night that Gov. Chafee attended a fundraiser for the incumbent representative.  Then the Governor’s office confirmed as much in this statement.

There’s a danger of reading too much into this, but it appears to be a good sign for both Mr. Cicilline and Gov. Chafee. It definitely hurts the campaign of Mr. Cicilline’s challenger Brendan Doherty, who could’ve bolstered his argument of being an acceptable Republican for Rhode Island by winning Gov. Chafee’s endorsement, Rhode Island’s last federal delegation Republican (it’s unlikely Mr. Doherty ever sought the Governor’s endorsement). But with no non-Democratic statewide officeholders left to endorse him, Mr. Doherty will have to rely on obscure RIGOP apparatchiks, conservative media, and the nationally-despised national Republican Party.

Mr. Cicilline won’t be overly-bolstered by this endorsement. As Mr. Nesi points out, the Governor and the Congressman are the two most disliked politicians in Rhode Island right now (of those politicians included on polls). If this was two years ago, such an endorsement might’ve shored up Mr. Cicilline’s progressive supporters, which it will somewhat help to do now. But Governor Chafee is not the same as Candidate Chafee, and his low poll numbers are likely due to a collapse in support from the labor-progressive coalition that propelled him into office in 2010. It does mean that potential Democratic primary opponent Anthony Gemma is increasingly isolated in Rhode Island’s political landscape.

I think Gov. Chafee actually benefits the most from this endorsement. There’s no doubt that the Governor has been pulling reliable duty as a Democratic Party workhorse; co-chairing President Barack Obama’s re-election committee, endorsing Senator Sheldon Whitehouse who ousted him from office, appearing with Providence mayor Angel Taveras, and now this. If the Governor makes the switch from Independent to Democrat, he might might be able to get more cooperation from the General Assembly in time for 2014, perhaps preside over a few legislative successes and stay in the limelight by virtue of party affiliation.

His fortunes are tied to those of the state’s of course, and Democrats might prefer that the Governor remains apart; setting up what could be an easy pick-up for current Treasurer Gina Raimondo without the risk of an unpopular candidate harming any down-ticket party members.


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387