Providence Student Union launches #OurHistoryMatters campaign


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

2016-01-20 PSU 014The Providence Student Union (PSU) rallied outside the Providence School Department Wednesday to demand Ethnic Study classes be taught for credit in high school. The event served as a kickoff to the PSU’s #OurHistoryMatters campaign, to counter the lack of representation of the Latino, Black, Southeast Asian, and American Indian population in the school’s classes.

PSU was joined in their effort by representatives from PrYSM, the EJLRIYouth in Action and DARE as well as community and labor leaders.

Recent studies have shown that high school students perform better when race and ethnicity classes are offered. A Guardian report on a Stanford University study said, “Student attendance increased by 21%, while grade-point averages surged nearly a grade and a half for those enrolled in the class – striking results, according to the researchers.”

Students spoke passionately about the lack of representation in their history classes (see video below). They also resented having to learn real history outside of school. “I just recently learned the truth about Columbus Day,” said Diane Gonzalez from Central High School. “I didn’t know who Columbus really was, until I learned it with Providence Student Union, in one of our mini workshops about oppression… I’m Guatemalan, and I have no idea about our history at all.”

“This is an undeniable problem,” said Afaf Akid, a senior at E-Cubed Academy and a PSU youth leader, in  a statement. “We did an analysis of the American history textbook we use in Providence, and our results were shocking. Of our textbook’s 1,192 pages, fewer than 100 pages are dedicated to people of color. That’s less than 10% of our history curriculum, in a district where 91% of the students are people of color. That is unacceptable. And, of course, the few references to people of color are problematic as well, often treating issues like slavery and colonialism as neutral or even positive developments. We deserve better.”

“The oppression of enslaved African-Americans and Native Americans is disguised as… ‘cultural exchange,'” said Licelit Caraballo, “the hardships that Asians had to endure as they migrated to the US is viewed as just ‘seeking work’ when they were also treated as slaves. Our history books don’t cover these topics.”

A very interesting part of the presentation consisted of holding up black and white posters of famous activists of color, and asking those in attendance if they knew the people pictured. First up was Bayard Rustin, a leader in civil rights, socialism, nonviolence, and gay rights written out of civil rights history because of his homosexuality and atheism. Also held up was Fred Hampton of the Black Panther Party, Grace Lee Boggs, author, social activist, philosopher and feminist born here in Providence, Dolores Huerta, labor leader and civil rights activist and Ella Baker, civil and human rights activist.

“We think it should be pretty self-evident that Providence students need a more culturally relevant curriculum,” said Justin Hernandez, a junior at Hope High School and a PSU school delegate. “But if those in charge of our school system need convincing, we are ready. We’re used to tough fights, from ending the unfair NECAP graduation requirement to expanding bus passes. And we are excited to do whatever it takes to win ethnic studies courses and move our schools a little closer towards providing us the education we deserve.”

2016-01-20 PSU 001

2016-01-20 PSU 002

2016-01-20 PSU 003

2016-01-20 PSU 004

2016-01-20 PSU 005

2016-01-20 PSU 007

2016-01-20 PSU 008

2016-01-20 PSU 010

2016-01-20 PSU 011

2016-01-20 PSU 012

2016-01-20 PSU 013

2016-01-20 PSU 014

2016-01-20 PSU 015

2016-01-20 PSU 016

2016-01-20 PSU 017

2016-01-20 PSU 018

2016-01-20 PSU 019

2016-01-20 PSU 020

2016-01-20 PSU 021

2016-01-20 PSU 022

2016-01-20 PSU 024

2016-01-20 PSU 025

2016-01-20 PSU 026

2016-01-20 PSU 027

2016-01-20 PSU 028

Patreon

Ed Funding working group recommends changes


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Created by Gov. Gina Raimondo in late October, the 29-member Funding Formula Working Group developed a draft package of adjustments to the state formula to be delivered to policymakers as soon as this week.

At their meeting tonight, the working group is expected to approve 20 recommendations responding to Gov. Raimondo’s executive order. The group has returned suggestions for improvement in three key areas: meeting the needs of all students and schools; ensuring fairness among school types (i.e., traditional districts and charters); and best practices in educational funding, efficiency, and innovation.

None of the recommendations come with specific dollar figures or proposed legislative language. The group’s aim was policy recommendations, rather than budget or mechanisms, and it will be up to the Governor’s staff working with the general assembly to determine specific tweaks to the language of the six-year-old funding statute.

At a basic level, the working group recommended against any major changes to the mathematics of the formula itself, seeking to avoid creating any new “winners or losers” while municipalities are still absorbing the effects. But they did establish as a fundamental principle that allocation should be based on student needs, “irrespective of the type of public school they attend,” and they aimed to do this while producing minimal impact on total state aid spending.

In the first main area, “Meeting the needs of all students,” the group came closest to changing the formula with a recommendation to provide additional support targeted to English Language Learners. Given that the current formula uses the number of students receiving free or reduced price lunch as a proxy (the so-called “student success factor”), this change would bring RI in line with the 46 other states that provide designated ELL funding. The group suggested ensuring that the aid is earmarked for ELL programs and that student progress is monitored (to ensure students are exiting programs appropriately.)

Another significant (and sometimes unpredictable) expense for local districts is high-cost special education students, and the working group recommended providing additional targeted support here as well. Currently, districts can get state aid for students who require 500% of the standard per-pupil expenditure (roughly $60,000). The working group recommended that this should be “adjusted to broaden district and school reimbursement eligibility.”

The second major area, “Ensuring fairness among school types,” introduces some new data-driven thinking about the differing expense profiles and fixed and variable costs incurred by traditional school districts and charter schools. This was not something overlooked in the original formula, but rather a perspective developed in the years since implementation. Traditional school districts face “out of district” special ed costs and other funding burdens that amount to around $1,200 per pupil; charter schools, on the other hand, have average rental costs and debt service of around $900 per pupil. The working group recommended adjustments to the funding formula to take these differing expenses into account, while maintaining balance: “they cannot consider expenses only on the side of charter schools or traditional districts.”

Also integral to fairness, the working group noted, is responding to the constraints of fixed and marginal costs created by school choice. These costs need to be quantified, the group proposed, and additional support should be provided to “traditional districts with high percentages of students enrolled in public schools of choice.”

In the final area, “Best practices in educational funding, efficiency, and innovation,” the working group noted that some communities have maintained “low levels of investment in public education,” and recommended strengthening the “maintenance of effort” language that ensures municipalities account for inflation and enrollment increases. The group also recommended that the funding formula should be subject to review on scheduled basis, and that possibilities for using funding to drive innovation and best practices should be explored.

All in all, the working group’s report provides only a schematic of the areas in which there was broad consensus that adjustment was needed. The actual language of any proposed changes to the funding process will have to wait for articulation by the Governor’s office and the general assembly. The full text of the draft will be available shortly on the RIDE web site.

Glen Ford on the corporate charter school education deform effort


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Glen Ford of Black Agenda Report is one of my favorite analysts and journalists, a man whose reportage has been compared to the work of Frederick Douglass by Prof. Tony Monteiro. His mind is sharp and brilliant in ways that make me honored to have corresponded with him. Here, Ford explains the way that the Democratic Party has been infiltrated by the neoliberal anti-teacher union charter school lobby and what to expect from hucksters like Sen. Cory Booker, a right wing Republican in Democratic Party clothing. As the neoliberal agenda continues to be made manifest in our communities, be mindful of the patterns Ford discusses here and which were discussed in the previous post on this topic in Chicago.

Blank chart

kaGh5_patreon_name_and_message

Classical student shares photo of moldy lunch from Sodexo


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Moldy Bun

Leslie Ann Ortiz fears that she may have eaten moldy food in the school cafeteria after her friend showed her the mold on the bottom of her sandwich, the same kind of sandwich Ortiz had just finished. Ortiz is is a Junior at Classical High School in Providence.

“Yesterday at lunch my friend and I got sandwiches and I ate mine and [my friend] yelled, disgusted. [She] showed me the mold and I went to tell a teacher and they did nothing,” Ortiz told me. She took the picture of her friend’s moldy sandwich and shared it on social media.

“I didn’t look at my sandwich so it’s gross, you know?” Ortiz said.

In the comments of her Facebook post, Ortiz wrote, “I’ve also found mushed green gooey rotten red apples, a juice dated to 2001 and grilled cheese sandwiches where they just rubbed cheese on it and took it off.”

Lunches in Providence schools are contracted out to Sodexo. Sodexo’s page on the Providence Schools website says that the company, “delivers healthy and delicious school meals based on the USDA’s nutrition guidelines so that students are engaged and ready to learn in school. All meals include a variety of fresh fruit and vegetable choices, and a variety of chilled non-fat or low-fat milk.”

Sodexo did not return my calls in time for this story. Calls have also been placed to Classical High School and the office of Mayor Jorge Elorza.

After seeing the photo online, lawyer and community activist Shannah Kurland quipped, “Wtf?!! Sodexo IS the school to prison pipeline!”

“I was trying to show everyone in my school this so they can watch out,” said Ortiz, “the quality [of the food] is just horrible and that’s why me and a lot of students would rather starve then eat that stuff.”

Patreon

Interfaith Vigil at State House proposes ambitious poverty agenda


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
2016-01-06 Interfaith Poverty Vigil 02
Bishop Herson Gonzalez

For the eighth year the Rhode Island Interfaith Coalition to Reduce Poverty held a vigil at the State House near the beginning of the legislative season to, in the words of House Speaker Nicholas Mattiello, “remind all of us in the General Assembly of how important it is to keep the issues related to poverty at the forefront of our agenda.”

The vigil was attended by representatives from a multitude of faiths. Governor Gina Raimondo, Speaker Mattiello and Senate President M Teresa Paiva-Weed all spoke briefly to the crowd. The keynote was delivered by Bishop Herson Gonzalez of the Calvary Worship Center in Woonsocket.

Maxine Richman, co-chair of the RI Interfaith Coalition to Reduce Poverty (Coalition) spoke first, outlining the 2016 Advocacy Platform for the group. She began with a sobering statistic. 14.3 percent of Rhode Islanders live in poverty. That rate climbs to 19.8 percent when we talk about children specifically.

2016-01-06 Interfaith Poverty Vigil 05“A 14.3 percent poverty rate is the story for this year,” said Richman, “but it need not be the story for next year.”

The coalition believes that all Rhode Islanders are entitled to affordable housing, nutritious food, accessible healthcare, equitable education and work with decent wages.

Though the General Assembly raised the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) last session, something both Paiva-Weed and Mattiello touted as a great success in their opening remarks Tuesday, RI’s present 12.5 percent rate is a far cry from Connecticut’s EITC of 27.5 percent or Massachusetts’ 23 percent. The Coalition is asking the General Assembly raise the RI EITC to 20 percent.

2016-01-06 Interfaith Poverty Vigil 20
Governor Raimondo

Channeling yesterday’s loud rally, and on the day that Governor Raimondo has officially broken her campaign promise to issue an executive order allowing undocumented workers to obtain driver’s licenses, the Coalition asked state leaders to take this important step.

Right now low and no income Rhode Island families with children are eligible to receive cash assistance for a maximum of up to 24 months within a five year window. A mother with two children is eligible to receive $554 a month for up to 24 months.  When the 24 months are done, the family is cut off, leaving children to live in crushing poverty. The coalition would like to end the 24 month limit.

2016-01-06 Interfaith Poverty Vigil 27Also, as they have asked nearly every year and to no avail, the Coalition would like the General Assembly to take action to reform PayDay loans. This is unlikely as long as Speaker Mattiello continues to pretend that “arguments against PayDay lending tend to be ideological in nature.”

The coalition would also like to see an expansion of Child Care Assistance and Early Childhood Education. as of Fall, 2014, for instance, only 34 percent of eligible children were enrolled in Head Start, “with many centers maintaining long waiting lists.”

The Coalition further wants to reduce out-of-school detentions which predominantly target students of color and feed the school-to-prison pipeline. They would also like to expand opportunities for workforce foundational skills and occupational training.

The RI Coalition for the Homeless (RICH) needs adequate funding to implement Opening Doors RI, and would like state leaders to seek a $100 million affordable housing bond.

The Coalition also backs efforts to prevent domestic abusers from accessing guns, a bill that died in committee last year to the consternation of supporters and the embarrassment of the General Assembly.

The Coalition would like to see adequate funding for Senior Centers and lastly, the Coalition wants the General Assembly to maintain the current RIPTA Senior/Disbabled Fare Program, recognizing that balancing the budget of public transit of the backs of the most vulnerable is simply cruel. Paiva-Weed was the only state leader to state that she would work to make this happen. Raimondo vowed to make RIPTA “affordable” which is apparently a number other than free.

“These all sound good, but where do we find the money?” asked Raimondo.

“I am very concerned about imposing a fee on elderly and disabled RIPTA passengers,” said Paiva-Weed, “and I am committed to looking at alternative funding.”

Attempting to explain his statement at last years Interfaith Poverty Vigil where he said that he wants to eliminate the social safety net, Speaker Mattiello spun a vision of a Utopian future world. “When we get the economy to a point where everybody’s thriving,” said the Speaker, “every single family has a wage earner that is successfully feeding the family, and everybody is doing well and is well fed… families are happy… that will be the day we don’t need a safety net. And at that time our safety net will justifiably be smaller.”

Here’s Bishop Herson Gonzalez’s keynote address.

Note: I was fortunate today to get permission from Rachel Simon to run her pictures of the event. So all these pictures are under her 2016 copyright.

2016-01-06 Interfaith Poverty Vigil 37

2016-01-06 Interfaith Poverty Vigil 36

2016-01-06 Interfaith Poverty Vigil 35

2016-01-06 Interfaith Poverty Vigil 34

2016-01-06 Interfaith Poverty Vigil 33

2016-01-06 Interfaith Poverty Vigil 32

2016-01-06 Interfaith Poverty Vigil 31

2016-01-06 Interfaith Poverty Vigil 30

2016-01-06 Interfaith Poverty Vigil 29

2016-01-06 Interfaith Poverty Vigil 28

2016-01-06 Interfaith Poverty Vigil 26

2016-01-06 Interfaith Poverty Vigil 25

2016-01-06 Interfaith Poverty Vigil 24

2016-01-06 Interfaith Poverty Vigil 23

2016-01-06 Interfaith Poverty Vigil 21

2016-01-06 Interfaith Poverty Vigil 19

2016-01-06 Interfaith Poverty Vigil 18

2016-01-06 Interfaith Poverty Vigil 17

2016-01-06 Interfaith Poverty Vigil 16

2016-01-06 Interfaith Poverty Vigil 15

2016-01-06 Interfaith Poverty Vigil 14

2016-01-06 Interfaith Poverty Vigil 13

2016-01-06 Interfaith Poverty Vigil 12

2016-01-06 Interfaith Poverty Vigil 11

2016-01-06 Interfaith Poverty Vigil 10

2016-01-06 Interfaith Poverty Vigil 09

2016-01-06 Interfaith Poverty Vigil 08

2016-01-06 Interfaith Poverty Vigil 07

2016-01-06 Interfaith Poverty Vigil 06

2016-01-06 Interfaith Poverty Vigil 04

2016-01-06 Interfaith Poverty Vigil 01

2016-01-06 Interfaith Poverty Vigil 03

And here’s the full vigil.

Patreon

Sad ending for RIC President Carriuolo, will her legacy survive?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

postpresidentNews broke this week that embattled Rhode Island College President Nancy Carriuolo will step down from her post in spring 2016 under terms in her contract designating her departure as “termination without cause.” This is a truly saddening moment for many in the college community and leaves some discouraged but others, including students, claiming victory.

In an email sent to the entire Community by the Office of the President, she wrote:

As we are all aware, recently the campus community has voiced a very public mixture of support and criticism of my time at RIC. I cannot ignore the fact that the college community is divided. Consequently, for the sake of the college, the Postsecondary Council and I have agreed that I will step down as president after spring graduation. Next year will be a critical time for higher education in Rhode Island and securing the next leader for RIC as soon as possible will be important to ensuring a smooth and productive transition. I look forward to remaining in my role as president through graduation, and I look forward to us all working together for the good of the college.

Some members of the student community said things on Facebook like “about bloody time” while others wrote on her personal page “It’s my last week of grad school … also the RIC president Nancy Carriuolo resigned…. I had the pleasure of meeting her a few times and as student at RIC… politics aside… I think she did great things for the campus and I loved how much she interacted with the students there.” It is obvious that, while this is not social networking analysis of a professional, the student community was not fully behind this President and she would have been put in a situation where, between disgruntled staffers and the student body, the well-being of the College could have been put at risk.

Geography Prof. Mark Motte, one of the original public signatories of the letter that brought about this state of affairs, was to be found on WPRO radio crowing victory while failing to present any actual evidence for his claims. In this regard, perhaps it is appropriate to bring to the forefront why people in the College community found his name dubious in relation to voicing the complaints of a labor union, the AFT-affliated Professional Staff Association. Dr. Motte was, until the appointment of Dr. Carriuolo, a member of the administration, perhaps with his own aspirations for higher office, who had a personal stake in seeing faculty contracts negotiated in a fair and timely manner. But on a regular basis, now-President Emeritus John Nazarian would delay negotiations and contracts would be signed long after the expiration of the previous one, a matter that was given coverage in the student-run Anchor newspaper. Yet Dr. Motte never resigned in protest over the treatment of his colleagues in a labor dispute, so why is he positioning himself suddenly in the press as the Samuel Gompers of the staff labor union? Sources indicate there were problematic issues involving the president’s office and staff, including frequent turnovers of various officials that caused friction as well as a problem with how Dr. Carriuolo personally interacted with employees. But asking Dr. Motte or Michael Smith, another former administration member, to champion a labor dispute is an extraordinarily dubious public relations move. It invites only scrutiny and rebuttal, especially considering that the Rhode Island AFT local is on Smith Street, just adjacent to the campus.

Dr. Carriuolo was only the second woman, after Dr. Carol Guardo, to serve as president of the college and both women left the office under dubious circumstances. When Dr. Guardo left, Dr. Nazarian returned to the presidency after serving in what had been intended to be only an interim fashion and ran the College so that its reputation and prestige were diminished, becoming the second choice for those who could not get into the University of Rhode Island and serving as an over-glorified vocational school as opposed to a genuine college. His silence during this entire affair has been quite suspect and raised a few eyebrows. It is also worth noting that, though Dr. Motte claims to value “speaking truth to power” he would never have dared pull such a stunt on Dr. Nazarian despite the way he managed things.

This episode does not conclude with Dr. Carriuolo, in fact it only begins a much more troublesome set of affairs. Now a replacement will be needed, requiring a search committee that will spend tax monies that could be spent elsewhere. Will the search be nationwide or will it be in-house? Will Mr. Smith, Dr. Motte, or Peg Brown, another public signatory, try to parlay this into submitting their names for consideration for the job? Did Governor Raimondo, the state’s first female to hold the office, refuse to comment on the matter so to shore up support from the AFT, a constituency with which she has shaky standing? Did the Providence Journal, who acted quite shamefully here, refuse to do the proper investigation regarding the claimants and their motivations despite the fact that faculty tried to repudiate the charges because of an agreement regarding motives or because they were too embarrassed to admit they were played for fools quite successfully by the PR-savvy Jane Fusco, another public signatory? Will some of the great things Carriuolo accomplished during her tenure be reversed now that her exit will be tarnished, including the planned nursing building in downtown Providence? If someone who was involved in these complaints about Dr. Carriuolo returns to positions of power under the new president, will those who defended Dr. Carriuolo face repercussions, especially considering the combination of academia’s sectarian tendencies on top of Rhode Island’s political crony culture? Now that their mission is accomplished, will the other signatories of the original letter come forward and give a through explanation as to what exactly happened here? Will the State of Rhode Island provide an unredacted copy of the letter to the press if a public records request is filed? All these questions and more will be answered as we continue to investigate this matter.

Editorial Note: A previous version of this misidentified Dr. Motte as an anthropologist as opposed to geographer. At one point in history Geography and Anthropology were part of the same department at RIC.

kaGh5_patreon_name_and_message

Learn all about the grand ed deform plan in THE SCHOOL CLOSURE PLAYBOOK


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Jacobin magazine is not my favorite publication on the Left, mostly because it seems to have some spots where it is putting its layout editorial policy ahead of everything else, producing gorgeous magazines that sometimes seem to be all over the place ideologically. That said, they did a fantastic job this summer commemorating the 150th anniversary of the Union victory in the Civil War. Earlier this year, they released a short documentary titled THE SCHOOL CLOSURE PLAYBOOK that explains how the neoliberal charter school deformation of public education has been executed against Chicago.

Since then, Mayor Rahm Emanuel has entered one of the most politically treacherous waters since perhaps the 1968 Democratic Party Convention devolved into street fights between Mayor Daley’s militarized Chicago Police and thousands of anti-war protesters who were disgusted with the machinations of the pro-Vietnam War Hubert Humphrey. It seems unlikely that Emanuel will emerge unscathed from the Laquan McDonald police shooting scandal. Yet regardless of what happens to one over-glorified and under-qualified Clinton-era political hitman who somehow tricked voters into electing him, we can be sure that the neoliberal teacher union-busting strategy he has implemented in Chicago is going to continue to be used across America, a strategy that sounds eerily familiar to those who watch the policies in Providence and other school districts in the Ocean State. In this sense, this video is a Christmas gift for local public school teachers. As the Chicago teachers prepare to go on strike again, thanks in no small part to the rise of the Caucus of Rank-and-File Educators in the ranks, we should see Chicago as both a warning and guide for strategy.

RIC faculty on College Council votes confidence for President Carriuolo


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

The Rhode Island College shared governance body, the College Council, composed of faculty representatives from each department, adjuncts, professional staff, and the President, held a vote of confidence in the leadership of President Nancy Carriuolo on December 11.

While this body is not representative of the entirety of the college community, it does serve as a forum for representatives of the community to participate in operations of the college and voice issues raised by each constituency. With a vote of 18 yea, 2 nay, and 3 abstentions, they voiced their support for the president and her vision for the college. Though the President does sit on the body and was present at the opening of the meeting, she exited following some brief preliminary remarks and did not ask for the vote to be held, it was totally voluntary and began as a motion suggested by the membership.

Prior to the vote and after the president had exited, there was an open and frank discussion before the body regarding the entire matter. Professional staff representatives did voice a level of dissatisfaction and unhappiness within their constituency and the faculty members of the body voiced their support for these concerns and expressed hope that a mechanism could be devised that would allow for grievances to be heard without repercussion. Another issue raised was the fact that the negative publicity has added a time-sensitive aspect to the proceedings that was impacting both the college’s reputation and faculty contract negotiations potentially. It also was brought forward that it appeared on campus that elements of discontent were now being sown within the faculty towards the administration that would further negatively impact the president even though these issues could be caused by any number of administration members subordinate to the president’s office.

The president, in her brief remarks, spoke to a variety of issues, including her efforts to be transparent, her standing as a fundraiser, and also a breach of her personal email that was involved in this affair. She emphasized that she was open to any scrutiny or oversight but also had chosen to consistently offer no comment publicly. This has indeed been the case for this reporter, the president, leadership of the Professional Staff Association, and individual members of the on-campus community have offered no comment when queried for insights. Off the record, one community member did explain there had been a lot of firings on campus and that there was anger because newly hired staff were unable to gain full benefits of state employment, an arrangement previously set out by a past administration, but that seems unlikely to be the direct fault of the President and instead seems to be symptomatic of systemic governance issues in Rhode Island.

Dr. Richard Lobban
Dr. Richard Lobban

On December 8, 2015, the Providence Journal ran an opinion piece by Rob Bower regarding the controversy that included mention of a survey of staff at the College originally cited in the letter sent to the Council on Postsecondary Education that began this whole affair. This poll has created a good deal of consternation and also curiosity amongst the College community.

One of these community members is Professor Emeritus Richard Lobban of the Anthropology department, whose previous work in social networking analysis and research methods included administration and analysis of surveys, polls, and other data collection methods. He sat down for an interview and discussed his findings, which he shared with the College Council on December 11. It is worthwhile to note that, since Bower’s piece included mention of Affirmative Action department issues, Dr. Lobban was involved during his career at the College in the Africana department as well and previously served as Vice President for Education at the Rhode Island Black Heritage Society. After attending the meeting, he expressed a level of enthusiasm for the Council’s vote, modifying earlier points expressed in the audio interview below.

Some key points to keep in mind when discussing this survey:

  • Taken June-July 2015 (the response deadline was extended beyond June 24)
  • Type of survey: paper; each survey document was embossed with the PSA seal to ensure that each returned survey was genuine. No reproductions were allowed.
  • Total distributed: 160, by mail to home addresses of members
  • Total responses: 87, by return mail to home address of PSA President
  • Response rate: 54.4%
  • Total number of statements: 44

Instead of helping settle questions, this survey only creates more that have yet to be answered.

In the first place, if this staff survey, issued under the imprimatur of the American Federation of Teachers, were a true measure of labor malfeasance, why would the union have chosen to introduce this story via personages such as Jane Fusco, Mark Motte, Michael Smith, and Peg Brown? Without getting into a personal attack akin to the verbiage of the news story that began this whole episode, these individuals carry with them a certain reputation in the College community that makes these complaints seem dubious. At a time when college campuses are actively alight with discussions among students about labor rights, thanks in small part to the reintroduction of the word ‘socialism’ in the mainstream political discourse, and adjunct professors and instructors across the country are holding union drives, why not take care to introduce these issues in a fashion that would take advantage of Rhode Island’s historic unionized labor force and culture? Why do it in a fashion that only impugns the reputation of the College, thereby possibly risking the jobs of the surveyed laborers?

Furthermore, since when has the Providence Journal been sympathetic to state workers and their complaints? It is becoming abundantly clear as the days go by and members of the community come forward to defend the President and dispute the validity of these claims that the entire news media, starting with the Journal, has perhaps been taken for a ride. Sources familiar with this issue have indicated that, if there are indeed issues to be discussed regarding the President and her administration of the College and/or treatment of staffers, let them be heard but in an open, honest, and transparent fashion that gives voice to the actual staffers in totality rather than in a fashion that invites skepticism and suspicion of ulterior motives. Sources further indicate that there perhaps were questions to be raised about financial issues at the College. If that be the case, again, why have the revelations come from those who invite only rebuttal, scrutiny, and claims of ulterior motives?

RIC President Emeritus John Nazarian.
RIC President Emeritus John Nazarian.

But there are still more questions. For example, where in all of this is the voice of President Emeritus John Nazarian? This story has generated a high level of negative press for the College not just in the state but in fact the world after it was picked up on the international wire services. For someone who spent five decades building the College and promoting its name, his silence is noticed and deafening for some, especially when one recalls that President Carriuolo was originally selected from within the state government body that deals with higher education, meaning that Dr. Nazarian would have known her rather well. Considering that the original public signatories of the letter, Motte, Fusco, Smith, and Brown, were all close to Nazarian, it would be quite interesting to hear him come to the defense of his successor. Sources have indicated that he was last seen on campus at the dedication of the Alex and Ani arts building in fall 2014, which raised some eyebrows at the time considering his absence otherwise since retirement.

The final question of course is about the political agenda. It could be anything from a grand neoliberal effort to privatize public education to a long-standing scheme on Smith Hill to reduce the number of public four year institutes on the state budget to grandstanding in an effort to regain former prestige and positions on the campus, particularly since some of the signatories were angling for the Presidency before Carriuolo was appointed, with Peg Brown in fact submitting her name for formal consideration. Nevertheless, this entire affair has unnecessarily damaged the reputations of the President, the College, and indeed the AFT-affiliated union of staffers that were originally surveyed. And it is far from over.

kaGh5_patreon_name_and_message

URI statement on downtown arrest video


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Screen Shot 2015-12-02 at 7.43.58 PMIn response to the story on RI Future, in which a video seemed to show a University of Rhode Island police officer or private security guard kick a suspect while he was being apprehended, URI has released the following statement:

URI police apprehended a man suspected of stealing a bike from in front of the URI Providence Campus building at 6:43 p.m. Tuesday, Dec. 1. After receiving a report of a bicycle being stolen, URI police and security officers responded immediately.

The suspect attempted to flee, but URI police and security officers, and a private security officer pursued the suspect and a struggle ensued.

The suspect sustained minor injuries during the arrest and Providence Rescue was called to the scene. The suspect refused medical treatment and signed a waiver. The URI police officer and the private security officer also received minor injuries as a result of the struggle.

The suspect, Alan Christopher Corey, 44, was then transported to the URI Police Department at the Kingston Campus where URI emergency medical technicians examined him. He was charged with misdemeanor larceny in connection with the theft of a bicycle, as well as resisting arrest and simple assault on a private security officer.

After Corey admitted that he had used a false name, a records check showed that he was wanted on a warrant from 6th District Court. Given the active warrant, Corey was then transported to the Adult Correctional Institutions.

As is standard practice in cases such as this, URI Police are reviewing the use of force as well as the amateur cell phone video that RIFuture obtained and the surveillance video that was available at the crime scene. The brief cell phone video shows only the latter portion of the struggle with Corey, which includes a URI security officer kicking a box cutter knife out of the suspect’s reach to clear the scene of any weapon.

Corey later admitted to stealing the bike, which has not been recovered, and apologized to the security officers for his actions that evening.

The URI police will complete their report next week.

Patreon

Faculty show support for RIC President Carriuolo


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

postpresidentRhode Island College professors attended an Open Forum at the Council on Postsecondary Education at the Community College of Rhode Island Warwick campus to express their support for Rhode Island College President Nancy Carriuolo and repudiate the charges made by several RIC employees several weeks ago in a letter that was shared with the Providence Journal and others. The speakers were, in order of appearance:

  • Richard Lobban- Professor Emeritus, Anthropology
  • Carolyn Fluehr-Lobban- Professor Emeritus, Anthropology
  • Andrew Stewart- Treasurer, Class of 2009
  • David Espinosa- History
  • Daniel Scott- English
  • Vincent Bohlinger- Film Studies
  • Bethany Lewis- Psychology

Speaking enthusiastically of Dr. Carriuolo, they also emphasized that they found the original complaint of diminished faculty morale to be inaccurate. Dr. Bohlinger also emphasized that this instance had been an attack on not just a single person but on the entire institution and that it presented a poor image for the public. It is worthwhile to note that not a single complainant, even those whose names were publicized, made an appearance to defend their claims. Also in attendance was Dr. Joseph Zoronado of the English Department, who previously stated his rebuttal to claims of statistical anomalies in enrollment in a letter to the Journal. The audio is approximately twenty minutes.

What is ‘competency based education’?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

kids on computersSomething sinister has been happening to public education in America for the last decade or more. Billionaires such as Bill Gates, Eli Broad, and the Walton family have poured their fortunes into remaking our public schools and our public school students into what they envision will be good for multi-national corporations such as Pearson, Microsoft, McKinsey, and IBM. We saw this clearly with the Common Core State Standards and accompanying testing, with the bulk of the funding for the drafting, promoting, and implementing of the Common Core coming from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Now that there has been an (unexpected?) hue and cry about the over-testing of our students, here comes the antidote: competency/proficiency based education, aka personalization, aka student-centered education, and community partnerships. While this sounds on the surface like a welcome relief to the one-size-fits-all standardization of curricula and high-stakes standardized testing, it comes with its own pitfalls.

A perusal of the new “RI Strategic Plan for Public Education: 2015-2020” (http://media.ride.ri.gov/BOE/BOE_Meeting_102815/Encl6a.pdf), recently approved by the RI Board of Education, turns up a number of appealing-sounding but troubling buzzwords: personalized instruction, one-to-one computer technology, blended learning, online learning, community partners outside of the school, and particularly, proficiency-based instruction and assessment. In an ideal world, these buzzwords could be a refreshing approach to teaching and learning in a dazzling world of opportunity through technological advances. Very unfortunately, we do not live in an ideal world.

We need only look as far as the state of Maine to see what the ugly reality of competency/proficiency based education looks like in real schools with real students and teachers. Maine has plunged ahead with this agenda, helped along with money from the Nellie Mae Education Foundation (a grantee of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation), though there is no research (peer-reviewed or otherwise) that justifies transforming teaching and learning into a digital/online enterprise. Emily Kennedy Talmage is a teacher in Maine who has researched the roots of this agenda and written extensively about it in her blog, and it is unnerving. (http://emilytalmage.com/2015/04/26/save-maine-schools/) My take is that the PR for so-called proficiency based, personalized learning is riddled with code words that translate into outsourcing education to ed-tech vendors and “community partners,” marginalizing classroom teachers, holding students accountable to pre-determined, inappropriate standards (Common Core or Core-like), not allowing them to progress until they have achieved “mastery” of these inappropriate standards, feeding them game-like academic programs that foster zombie cognitive processing rather than real learning, and using extrinsic motivation like rewards and badges, all the while scooping up reams of sensitive data that will go who knows where and be used for who knows what.

While co-opting the language of the Civil Rights Movement with terms such as Equity and Opportunity, those pushing this digital innovation agenda are not sending their children to this brave new educational world. Private school students will still have small classes valuing interaction between teachers and students and students with peers, and rich curricula with the arts, languages, history, and social studies. Other people’s children will be seated at computer terminals, isolated from each other, eyes focused (or not) on screens which will be adjusted second by second to their keystrokes, the data siphoned off into cyber-space. (By the way, the federal Department of Education, the supposedly secure place where all public school students’ personally identifiable information will be channeled via the Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems, recently received a very poor grade for data security from the Office of the Inspector General.)

We need to ask Cui bono? Is this rush to digital learning truly for the benefit of the overwhelming majority of the children in America who attend public schools? Or is it a bonanza for the hedge funders and edtech entrepreneurs who will rake in an exorbitant amount of money directly or indirectly on learning modules of dubious quality?

The attempted coup at RIC


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

postpresidentNews broke on Friday that “[a] group of current and former Rhode Island College employees is asking the state Council on Postsecondary Education to replace college President Nancy Carriuolo, who they accuse of destabilizing the institution.” Yet those who have a rudimentary understanding of how the internal dynamics of Rhode Island College work grasp very well that this is a cunning, mean-spirited, and ultimately transparent ploy by a group of disgruntled former administrators who are trying to derail the work Dr. Carriuolo has done since taking office.

I feel I have several qualifications that allow me to speak here, I am the treasurer of the Rhode Island College Class of 2009, a former editor of the Rhode Island College Anchor Newspaper, and a former member of 90.7 WXIN Rhode Island College Radio, media platforms that covered the selection of Dr. Carriuolo. Since graduation, I have been keeping lightly abreast of events at my alma mater and have had several very pleasant interactions with the campus Dr. Carriuolo has modernized and the president herself, who has been absolutely wondrous. I also understand that Mark Motte, Peg Brown, and Jane Fusco are being quite disingenuous in their complaints, framing a basic procedural element of the transition between former College President Dr. John Nazarian and Dr. Carriuolo as some sort of totalitarian putsch.

Without getting into the personality-based mire that is quite ugly when discussing the length of Dr. Nazarian’s tenure, the fact is that the man was in office for eighteen years, 20 if you add the two years he served as interim president following the death of Dr. David Sweet, and had a total of five decades of involvement as a student, faculty member, and administrator when he left the campus. In that time, he created a culture based around his managerial and fiscal philosophy that made the college what it was from 1990 to 2008. When Dr. Carriuolo, a long-time member of the Rhode Island College community, took over, she brought with her a wholly different set of ideas and philosophies that have fundamentally redirected the trajectory of the college. I am not able to judge at this juncture what the long-term outcomes are because of the length of time she has been in office. But that change in leadership dictated Dr. Carriuolo also change the administrators and staff around her to affect her wishes for the college. The individuals lodging this complaint were part of the Nazarian nomenklatura who simply became far too comfortable in their roles. If the West Wing staff at the White House were to kick up such a fuss when a new president was inaugurated, people would laugh at such behavior.

I personally think that the things Dr. Carriuolo has spearheaded has been fantastic. Let me begin with the film department that I graduated from. Several years ago, I was invited back to campus to screen a film. When I entered the hall that I had taken multiple courses over my four years of matriculation, the large screening room in the Horace-Mann building, I thought I was at the wrong campus. When I used to watch films in that room, the sound was awful, the screen was problematic, and the tables with connected rotating chairs were, putting it politely, not the seating arrangement that works best for film students. Now the room has theatrical-styled seats with desktop side-bars, the sound is equivalent to the Showcase Cinema, and the screen is a marked improvement.

The department has been given the funding to expand and balance the curriculum in a way so that students get a fair dose of both film literacy and practical studio work, whereas when I was a student funding was so short one would be lucky to get four practical classes. If one did so, it was often the case they would take a few through the Communications Department, which has an orientation and logic sometimes completely opposed to the Film Department. Another time, I had a class on documentary film through the Anthropology Department where the professor included in the first class a condescending and mocking digression on those pesky ‘filmies’ that talked about all those weird notions that he had no use for. I respect and understand that, Film Studies and Anthropology are two different fields, but nonetheless it obviates a case where the Film Department was being given pittances rather than being allowed to flourish. Dr. Carriuolo has reversed that trend.

There are other places that Dr. Carriuolo has improved matters greatly. She has allowed Drs. Richard and Carolyn Fluehr-Lobban to install bee hives at the college as part of a project that has multiple applications for various departments and curriculums as well as the Sustainability Program and garnering praise from environmental groups. She has expanded the Non-Western Worlds curriculum in ways that are directly benefitting the greater community. For example, even though he was descended from West Asian parentage that spoke the language, Dr. Nazarian was unwilling to allow for Arabic language classes, something the new President has allowed for. In a period of time when our international affairs continue to interact with Arabic-language states, one does not have to be John Dewey to understand why one might like the ability to take low-cost Arabic language instruction courses.

The President’s Illuminated Walkway, installed to commemorate her selection, is a wonderful project that creates a safe pathway students can take to get across campus at night. When one in four female college students experiences some form of sexual violence during studies, this project becomes obviously a massive treasure for the community that will help decrease a terrible trend for years to come. Her streamlining and implementation of policies that guarantee students do not get lost in the shuffle of classes and end up wasting time and money over multiple years with no advancement, including things like the elimination of the undeclared major and greater emphasis on mandatory academic advising, is creating high-quality and better-educated students.

One of the projects that could very well be a major element of her lasting legacy is the collaboration with the University of Rhode Island in a nursing center at the South Street Landing. Despite the claims of Michael Smith, who has called it “a house of cards built on a foundation of ego, profit, and a profound lack of understanding of public policy”, this is actually a brilliant idea on multiple fronts. First, it helps better solidify the inter-institutional collaboration between the University and the College while simultaneously maintaining fealty to the unique character of each institute. The College has a fantastic nursing program while the University has a great pharmacy school, ergo creating an environment where both faculties can come together in one facility to collaborate without dragging both institutions through the disaster of merging them into a utopian Ocean State University is a very smart idea. Second, the presence of a major educational complex run but not one but two public universities is a powerful and long-lasting thrust back against the ethnically cleansing gentrification project in Providence that is fostered in no small part by Brown and Johnson and Wales Universities. This building will bring into the city working class and first generation students that do not have the scholarships, trust funds, and bad attitudes of the private school students. It seems obvious that Mr. Smith has misspoken about ego in this instance.

One cannot offer purely celebratory verbiage without critique and I will not do so. For example, I think it was unnecessary and inappropriate to even allow for a community dialogue about arming the campus police several years ago. I am not in love with the fact that the renovated arts building is named for the Alex and Ani jewelry company. Adjunct professors still are given low wages and can get caught in the academic quagmire caused by a lack of tenure-track positions in various departments. Yet on the same token, the individuals lodging this complaint are not active in ameliorating these issues, they are part of a leadership generation that helped create these problems. For example, when the gun debate was held during the Nazarian era, these voices were not in rousing opposition. If these are valid complaints, which they very well could be, these issues have been hijacked and utilized by individuals who have very little room to speak.

This issue is far more than just a personality conflict between a few disgruntled employees and a president. At the core of this move is a fundamental difference in philosophy regarding the role of the state in higher education. One school of thought would hope to see public education wither and die so to make a space for more privatized education and more difficulty for low-income and minority students. The other would like to reinvigorate the public education sector and create a culture in Rhode Island where everyone has the opportunity to learn and think critically. The former school also has a tendency to personally profit from cuts to education, putting themselves ahead of the students. It seems abundantly clear that faculty, staff, students, and alumni should stand in solidarity with Dr. Carriuolo here so to protect the integrity and sustainability of the Rhode Island College project.

kaGh5_patreon_name_and_message

ACLU reports continued over-suspension of students of color


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

RI ACLU Union LogoDespite growing consensus that out-of-school suspensions should only be used as a discipline of last resort, Rhode Island school districts continued to overuse suspensions during the 2014-2015 school year, a report by the American Civil Liberties Union of Rhode Island has found. The report, Oversuspended and Underserved, a follow-up to previous ACLU reports on the use of suspensions in Rhode Island public schools, found that schools doled out 12,682 suspensions in the last school year, often for minor misconduct. As in previous years, students with disabilities and students of color served a disproportionate amount of these suspensions.

While some school districts, education officials, and policymakers have acknowledged the need to address Rhode Island’s suspension problem, today’s report finds that much still needs to be done to address the persistent over-suspensions of even the youngest students. Among the report’s findings for the 2014-2015 school year:

  • The suspensions meted out last year resulted in more than 25,000 lost school days.
  • Over 1,000 elementary school students were suspended from school. Seventy-five of them were in kindergarten alone.
  • More than 60% of all suspensions were meted out for low-risk behavioral offenses such as “Disorderly Conduct” or “Insubordination/Disrespect.”
  • Black elementary school children were nearly six times more likely than their white classmates to be suspended from school. Hispanic children were three and a half times more likely than their white elementary school counterparts to be suspended.
  • Students with disabilities who have Individualized Education Plans were over two-and-a-half times more likely than a student without disabilities to be suspended from school.
  • More than two-thirds of the suspensions levied against high school students with IEPs were for low-risk offenses – exactly the punishment that IEPs should help these students avoid.

The report comes on the heels of the Rhode Island General Assembly’s near-approval this year of legislation to limit the use of suspensions to only those situations in which a child poses a serious physical risk, or when the student is disruptive and other methods to address his or her conduct have failed. The ACLU recommended that the General Assembly enact this legislation as soon as it convenes for its 2016 session.

Among its other recommendations, the report called on the Rhode Island Department of Education to work with districts to determine appropriate solutions for high suspension rates, and for school districts to work with the community to investigate alternative disciplinary methods. The ACLU also reminded parents of their right to appeal suspensions that they feel have been unfairly imposed.

Hillary Davis, ACLU of RI policy associate and the report’s author, said today: “Rhode Island’s children with disabilities and children of color have for too long borne the brunt of a system over-reliant on removing children from the classroom rather than correcting their behavior. The last school year was no exception. Our children deserve the opportunity to learn from their mistakes rather than potentially face a lifetime of severe consequences. Earlier this year, the General Assembly stood poised to make Rhode Island a leader in protecting children from the over-reliance on suspensions. We hope that swift action when the General Assembly reconvenes in January ensures that Rhode Island’s children will no longer find themselves cast out of school because of a bad day.”

A copy of the report is available here.

Previous ACLU of RI reports on school suspensions are available here.

[From an American Civil Liberties Union of Rhode Island press release]

Raimondo convenes discussion on state aid to local schools


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Prudence Island Schoolhouse, the smallest public school in Rhode Island. (Photo courtesy of Wikipedia)
Prudence Island Schoolhouse, the smallest public school in Rhode Island. (Photo courtesy of Wikipedia)

Governor Gina Raimondo announced today she is organizing a working group to review the state’s education funding formula.

“After five years, it is time to for a fresh look to review our education funding structure,” she said in a press release sent out today. “A significant part of jumpstarting our economy and creating opportunity for everyone is making sure our kids have access to the best education. Rhode Island has a strong formula and it is model for other states. However all key public policies benefit from regular review.”

State Education Commissioner Ken Wagner concurred, saying, “Now is the right time for another public conversation around the ways we fund children’s futures and about putting our dollars where our values are for the sake of our kids. The bottom line is: Everything we do has to be about supporting teaching and learning. If we’re doing something good, continue. If we’re getting in the way of teaching and learning, we have to be thoughtful and make tweaks. Investing in our classrooms and schools is an investment in the future of our economy and our state.”

Rhode Island didn’t have a formula for allocating state aid to school districts until just five years ago, when a fairly progressive plan that factors in “student enrollment, student poverty levels, and community wealth,” according to the press release. The current funding formula has been criticized as being overly generous to charter schools and not generous enough to poor urban schools.

According to the press release, Raimondo asked the working group to explore these themes:

  • Fairness across school types: Our funding formula must be fair and supported by data.
  • Flexibility and sufficiency: Our funding formula must enable prudent and sustainable flexibility at the district, school, and student levels.
  • Responsiveness to unique needs: Our families, communities, and schools have unique needs, and the funding formula needs to account for and accommodate these unique needs.
  • Fiscal responsibility: Our funding formula needs to direct resources to the areas in which they are needed most and the funding formula must encourage savings and efficiency whenever possible
  • Improved Outcomes: Our funding formula needs to invest these resources wisely to ensure improved outcomes.

She appointed these members to the working group:

  • Elizabeth Burke Bryant (Co-Chair), executive director, Rhode Island KIDS COUNT
  • Donald R. Sweitzer (Co-Chair), Chairman, IGT Corporation and Senior Public Affairs Advisor
  • Rep. Gregg Amore, House Education Committee, East Providence
  • Donato Bianco, LIUNA
  • Dr. Nancy Carriuolo, President, Rhode Island College
  • J. Michael D’Antuono, School Business Official, Providence
  • Sen. Daniel Da Ponte, Senate Finance Committee, East Providence
  • Karen Davis, Senior Vice-President, Hasbro
  • Kas R. DeCarvalho, Esq., Attorney, Pannone Lopes, and Board Member, The Met School
  • Patti DiCenso, Superintendent, Pawtucket
  • Sean Doyle, Technical Education Teacher, West Warwick High School
  • Dr. Gara B. Field, Principal, Pleasant View Elementary School, Providence
  • Georgia Fortunato, Superintendent, Lincoln
  • Victoria A. Gailliard-Garrick, Principal, William M. Davies, Jr. Career and Technical High School
  • Jo Eva Gaines, Chair, Newport School Committee, and member, Council on Elementary and Secondary Education
  • Sen. Hanna Gallo, Senate Education Committee, Cranston
  • Stephanie Gonzalez, Blackstone Valley Prep Mayoral Academy and member, Central Falls City Council
  • Joseph J. MarcAurele, Chairman, Washington Trust Bank
  • Amy Mullen, Special Education Teacher, Tiverton
  • Dr. Julie Nora, Head of School, International Charter School
  • Stephanie Ogidan Preston, Vice-President, Citizens Bank
  • Adam M. Ramos, Esq., Attorney, Hinckley Allen, and member of the Bristol Warren Education Foundation
  • Dr. Isadore S. Ramos, former Mayor of East Providence
  • Rep. Deborah L. Ruggiero, House Finance Committee, Jamestown
  • Toby Shepherd, Grants Program Officer, the Rhode Island Foundation
  • Alan J. Tenreiro, Principal, Cumberland High School and National Principal of the Year
  • Lisa Tomasso, the Providence Center and member of RIDE Strategic Planning Group
  • James Vincent, President, NAACP-Providence
  • Dr. Kenneth K. Wong (Advisor), Chair, Department of Education, Brown University

ACLU calls on schools to revise policies on SROs


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

RI ACLU Union LogoThe American Civil Liberties Union of Rhode Island has called on all school districts that currently have school resource officers (SROs) to re-evaluate their use in the schools and to revise the agreements they have with police departments that set out their job responsibilities. The call was prompted by incidents at Pawtucket’s Tolman High School last week, which reinforced many of the serious concerns the ACLU has long held regarding the routine presence of police officers in schools.

Patti DiCenso
Patti DiCenso

In a letter sent to Pawtucket school district superintendent Patti DiCenso on Tuesday and shared with school superintendents across the state, ACLU of RI Executive Director Steven Brown noted that school districts cede an “enormous amount of control” when they sign Memorandums of Understanding (MOU) with police departments, and that this “unnecessarily set the stage for last week’s series of ill-fated events” in which an SRO’s attempt to handle a single student’s behavioral issue led to the injury and arrest of the student and his brother, the arrest of eight other individuals, and the pepper spraying of numerous youth.

Reviewing the MOU in effect in 2011 between the Pawtucket school district and the police department, the ACLU noted that it designates the SRO as the school’s “law enforcement unit” who reports to the police department, not the school principal. In fact, the MOU authorizes the SRO to remove a student from school without notifying school officials, and, if the SRO charges a student with a crime, requires the principal to support the officer’s decision in any legal proceedings.

Steve Brown
Steve Brown

The Pawtucket MOU further specifies that all SRO assignment and retention decisions are made at the complete discretion of the Chief of Police, not school officials. In addition, while the MOU recognizes the importance of selecting officers with demonstrated abilities and skills in working with students, officers are not required to receive any training on addressing behavioral issues or understanding the needs of students. The ACLU questioned how seriously those interests and skills are considered in light of the fact that the SRO at the center of last week’s incident had been investigated for a videotaped incident in which he pepper-sprayed and repeatedly hit a man with his baton just months before he was assigned to the high school.

In the letter to Supt. DiCenso, the ACLU’s Brown stated: “Despite the tremendous power that SROs wield in an educational environment, your school district’s MOU allows police officers to walk the halls of schools with little responsibility to school officials themselves. That is because, at bottom, they serve the police, not the school.”

TolmanThe letter acknowledged that Pawtucket should not be singled out for such problems. A 2011 review by the ACLU of SRO use across the state found that many school departments had similar “one-sided” MOUs and that there were many incidents in which the presence of a police officer escalated a student’s minor infraction, such as wearing a hat in school, into an arrest for disorderly conduct.

“When a student’s immature behavior is addressed by a law enforcement official trained in criminality and arrest, not in getting to the root of a behavioral issue, neither the child nor the school is well served. In short, the presence of SROs redefines as criminal justice problems behavior issues that may be rooted in social, psychological or academic problems, for which involvement in the juvenile justice system is hardly the solution,” Brown stated in the letter.

The letter called on school districts to take responsibility for the police officers in their schools in order to prevent incidents similar to last week’s from happening again. In a series of recommendations, the ACLU urged Pawtucket and any other school departments that continue to use SROs to revise their MOUs to ensure school officials have a meaningful role in the selection of SROs and that, absent a real and immediate threat, school officials, not police, handle all disciplinary matters. The MOUs, the ACLU said, should also require SROs to receive annual training on issues such as restorative justice and adolescent development and psychology; establish clear limits on the use of force; and put in place simple procedures for students to raise concerns about the SRO.

Following delivery of the ACLU’s letter, a news article in the Valley Breeze indicated that Pawtucket school officials plan to review their agreement with the police department. The ACLU welcomes Pawtucket officials and officials from any other district re-evaluating their policies to contact its office for guidance.

[From an RI ACLU press release]

After the violence at Tolman: ‘What Now?’


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

2015-10-15 Tolman High 001The twenty people, parents, activists, concerned citizens and students, gathered in the meeting room at the Pawtucket Public Library Tuesday night agreed that the police officer violently arresting two brothers at Tolman High School last week used, “too much force.”

“I’ve never seen any 14, 15, or 17 year old handled in that way,” said Alexandra, the organizer of the meeting. She opened the meeting by writing the words, “WHAT NOW?!” on the wipe board. It was the question of the evening.

Alexandra arranged the meeting and lead the discussion along with Marco McWilliams, who runs the Black Studies program at DARE (Direct Action for Rights and Equality).

The ensuing discussion was challenging and illuminating. Some of those in attendance were students at Shea, another public high school in Pawtucket. “Having a police officer is necessary,” one student believed, “because what if a student brings a gun to school and intends to use it?”

2015-10-15 Tolman High 007An activist countered that, “safety is different from policing” and then worked to disentangle the two ideas. “Developing forms of keeping each other safe is important,” he said. “We need to ask ourselves ‘Why are our schools unsafe?’

“Having kids packed into an underfunded school leads to tensions that leads to beefs that lead to escalation,” continued the activist.

This struck me as true. When I first went to Tolman after the incidents took place, I encountered students who were plainly nervous about the violence that that had occurred. They felt that the violence would continue, and continue to escalate. According to these students, the tensions surrounding the arrests, subsequent protests and further arrests had lead to tensions growing between various gangs in Pawtucket and nearby cities. The police, always to be avoided, were seen as extra nervous and vigilant.

The expectation of further violence was, “in the air” as one 15 year old put it to me.

2015-10-15 Tolman High 002Back in the meeting room at the Pawtucket Library, someone suggested educating high school kids about their rights and teaching the youth to prevent the kinds of situations where they might be targeted for arrest by police officers. An objection to the second part of this idea was immediately voiced: Framing this as “how kids should behave puts the blame [for police violence] on the kids.”

“Where I’m from we’re harassed by police, all the time, for no reason,” said another participant, “At some point your rights just don’t matter.”

When the topic of the violence at Tolman is brought up by students at Shea, “the teachers say, ‘we don’t know what happened before the video started,’” said a student, “and that means they think the kids deserve it.”

The teachers would have a different point of view if they lived in Pawtucket and sent their kids to public schools, said the student. Like the police in Pawtucket, most teachers are white, and commute to work from nearby or even distant cities. “They don’t come from Pawtucket, most of them, and they don’t care about their impact on the city,” said a student about the teachers and police. There is an attitude among public sector workers that the problems of Pawtucket can be left in Pawtucket.

2015-10-16 Tolman 002“I don’t know how to defend myself and my children as a Hispanic woman,” said a mother. She has come to this meeting because she can imagine her children being arrested by police officers as shown in the video, and she worries. Like everyone in the room, she knows the statistics about students of color being disproportionately suspended from school. She is aware of the school to prison pipeline, and she wants to keep her children out of it.

It is suggested that the presence of police officers in schools causes students to be pushed into the court system, sometimes directly, like the two brothers arrested on video. Policing schools makes schools unwelcoming to students of color. Schools can take on a prison-like atmosphere.

“The reality of being black in America is to fear the police.”

“I’m a black guy with two degrees and I don’t feel safe with the police,” said a college professor attending the meeting, “and that’s because of my lifelong interactions with police.”

The meeting closed with some ideas about goals. Goals include bringing elders into schools, retired grandmothers for instance, to “change the energy of a school.” Another is for schools to be community run.

But the most important goal is to grow the group and begin to effect real change. The tragic events at Tolman have presented opportunities that people are eager to seize.

Patreon

Violence, protest at Tolman leads to dialogue, opportunity for students


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
2015-10-16 Tolman 001
After school at Tolman on Friday. (Photo by Steve Ahlquist)

There were no arrests, no protests, no pepper spray and, most importantly, no violence at Tolman High School on Friday. But after a series of surreal events at the Pawtucket high school – that began with a fight between a police officer and students on Wednesday and culminated on Thursday with police pepper spraying a student protest and arresting eight people – life didn’t quite get back to normal either.

Some 300 students were absent to start the day. There was an extra police officer inside, two police cars outside and two extra administrators on hand. Additionally, the school was in a state of what Superintendent Patti DiCesno called “shelter in place.”

2015-10-16 Tolman 005
Superintendent Patti DiCenso. (Steve Ahlquist)

“Students got to go to class, they got to go to lunch like normal,” she said. “But if they had to leave the room,” they needed an adult escort. This measure, DiCesno said, was actually unrelated to the events that played out on Thursday. “We were concerned … there’s other situations that have nothing to do with this that are going on with another city. There was chatter on twitter last night, it was kind of one city versus another city.”

This, plus yesterday’s events, left the entire Tolman community understandably apprehensive about the school day. “I think when they first came in this morning they were a little on edge,” she said of the students. About the teachers, she said, “Until we had our 7:30 meeting, I think they too were a little in shock and nervous. I think you could almost feel their relief after that half hour meeting.”

The students, too, relaxed, DiCesno said. “As the day went on when they got into a routine. By the end of the second period they felt like it was okay.” Even the number of absences dropped to about 100 by 9:15, with 20 being more normal.

Ten students met with her and Mayor Don Grebien at City Hall in the morning, which DiCesno said was very productive.

“Students were allowed to speak about all of their concerns, why they were afraid, what they were upset about and what they thought needed to be changed,” she said. “We’re hoping that this core group of kids can now be the voice of concern for students and for their safety and what they feel is the violation of their rights.”

There will be a “student-driven” assembly on Monday for the entire student body to ask the ten students about their meeting with the mayor. DiCesno said she hopes the group that met with the mayor joins forces with the existing Young Voices group at Tolman.

“If we can get these kids to join together then they can self advocate within their own building,” she said. “So what I would like to see them do is bring school policy to the school committee.”

DiCesno says the school is taking extra care to ensure that the students “feel like they are being heard.”

“We’re also going to provide time in school day for our street workers to work with the kids … to peacefully protest,” she said. “How to do this with a true message instead of chaos so there is a sense they are being heard.”

For Friday’s school day, she said, “we wanted two extra administrators, not more police presence, because we wanted people who could say you need to talk about this, let’s bring them over here because we have a little room set up.”

She didn’t comment on the incident, but said the officer involved was not unpopular with the students. He has been at Tolman for a year and a half and there have been no other incidents. “Even some of the students who may be angry about the incident will tell me in the same conversation ‘but I really like him.'”

She defended the concept of school resource officers, saying, “There are many more pluses in having a relationship with an SRO, but that determination will be made once the investigation is over and once the police department does it’s investigation.”

But she added, “Everything is on the table in that the kids are going to have a say … and I think as time goes by the students will get a little less uncomfortable and intense and they will be able to make good decisions about their school, about what they need and want. Right now we need to get them to feel safe and trust us that we are going to listen to them.”

2015-10-16 Tolman 002
Tolman students learn the power of protest. (Steve Ahlquist)

Tolman students report disturbing police behavior


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Tolman
Tolman High School

There are disturbing reports from Tolman High School students in Pawtucket concerning the behavior of police officers during yesterday’s mass arrest of eight student and two adult protesters.

One protester, said a student, was “arrested for flipping off the cops,” a constitutionally protected form of speech.

Another student who has “really bad asthma” was suffering an asthma attack after being hit with pepper spray. The student was told by police officers that she could “go to the hospital and get arrested, or you can stay here,” according to witnesses.

The protest outside the school Thursday morning was happening without a lot of the students inside the school being aware of what was happening. After a fire alarm was pulled, (for which a student was arrested) students flooded outside.

“Pulling the alarm was a good idea,” said a student, “No one knew what was going on until we all came out.”

2015-10-15 Tolman High 001Students involved in the protest were told that they were not allowed to have cellphones on their person while in school that day. “They didn’t want us communicating with people outside,” said the student.

Some students who refused to turn in their cellphones were refused readmission to the school, yet students feel the cellphones are necessary to protect themselves. After all, it was a cellphone video of a violent police arrest that sparked these incidents.

There was also some pushback against the mediation offered by the Institute for the Study and Practice of Nonviolence. Some students feel that the Institute street workers are more interested in “telling us to go back to class” than in addressing the root causes of the problem, which they see as the presence of police in the schools.

Some students want school resource officer Jared Boudreault removed from the school and fired from the Pawtucket Police Department for his actions. But more than that, they want police entirely out of schools. Instead of policing and suppression, some students say they want respect and the help of adults who are able to deescalate situations.

Meanwhile, representatives from several community and social justice groups are decrying the events of the last two days as evidence of the school to prison pipeline. The RI ACLU has repeatedly shown that across Rhode Island, “black [and Latino] children face unwarranted racial disparities in their earliest years, with long lasting consequences. The disparities begin in the classroom, and  at  a  very  early  age.”

“I really think it has to do with race,” said a Tolman student. She was speaking from her own experiences in high school and not quoting from a report.

Patreon

Peter Nightingale’s call to action at URI


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
2015-10-08 LNG 004
Peter Nightingale

At the University of Rhode Island’s 19th annual Diversity Week, Peter Nightingale, professor of physics at URI, and climate activist, challenged students’ perspectives on climate change and offered a call to action in order to address environmental racism. The event, “Race and the Environmental Justice Movement,” was held at the Multicultural Student Services Center.

Nightingale began the event with a stark warning: in order to avoid catastrophic climate change, we must reduce greenhouse emissions globally by 7 percent. The U.S. is home to a fraction of the world’s population, it emits 25 percent of global greenhouse gasses. Even though the U.S. is greatly responsible for climate change, it will be the poor of the world, nations with less developed infrastructure, that will bear the consequences.

Nightingale referenced Robert Bullard’s work, “Dumping in Dixie”, in the presentation:

The environmental movement in the United States emerged with agendas that focused on such areas as wilderness and wildlife preservation, resource conservation, pollution abatement, and population control. It was supported primarily by middle- and upper-middle-class whites. Although concern about the environment cuts across racial and class lines, environmental activism has been most pronounced among individuals who have above-average education, greater access to economic resources, and a greater sense of personal efficacy.”

“I’m one of those people who are in a position of privilege,” said Nightingale. It was Nightingale’s privilege that allowed him to be treated politely by police when resisting fracked gas expansion. “Suppose I were half my age, and my color is a little bit darker – would they be equally polite, and nice? No – absolutely not.”

In the fight for the environment, there are the following stakeholders: the environmentalists, the social justice advocates, and the neo-liberal boosters, who, “have as their chief concerns maximizing profits, industrial expansion, economic stability, laissez-faire operation, and deregulation,” said Nightingale, quoting Bullard.

“If you follow the economic discussion in Rhode Island,” continued Nightingale, “all you hear people say is ‘all we need is more jobs, more jobs’ – but when you scrape away the rhetoric, a lot of people of color and poor minorities are being divided among themselves… the elites never mention that it’s all about their profits, about busting unions, about exploiting people – and this is one of the problems we have to deal with.”

For instance, Governor Gina Raimondo stated, “I am committed to moving ahead with cost-effective, regional energy infrastructure projects—including expansion of natural gas capacity—that will improve our business climate and create new opportunities for Ocean State workers.”

Nightingale also referred to the President’s Climate Action Plan as the “President’s Business Climate Action Plan” – stating that it is based on the interests of Wall Street, not in science. We are moving away from fossil fuels, and going towards natural gas, essentially replacing carbon dioxide with methane, a gas that is much more potent than carbon dioxide. “Let that sink in – that’s what [Senator] Sheldon Whitehouse is saying we should do and it’s a bad plan”

Not only are we “Dumping in Dixie,” but we are dumping in Providence, we are dumping in Burrillville, and we are dumping globally. From National Grid’s proposed LNG liquefaction facility to the proposed gas-fired power plant in Burrillville, the environment and the people are under assault says Nightingale.

“Who are the people that live next to I-95 in Providence… the people are about to thrown out of their houses… their skin tone is a couple of shades darker than mine.” Nightingale directed attendees to the Environmental Protection Agency’s Environmental Justice website, which shows several environmental and demographic indicators regarding pollution. In the presentation, Nightingale showcased the current indicators for the proposed LNG liquefaction facility at Fields Point location in Providence, and compared the indicators to those of East Greenwich.

Nightingale continued by critiquing Cap and Trade. “We are taking a serious problem [and] financializing it. We’re putting it on the stock market, and we’re allowing people to speculate.” By allowing environmental destruction to continue in impoverished communities, while Wall Street profiteers from the destruction, we thus institutionalize environmental injustice. “We can live yet another day, because we are taking the livelihood from someone else in the Southern Hemisphere.” A prime example of this is the continued deforestation of the Amazon rain forest. Nightingale drew a parallel to Pope Francis’ comments on climate change and tax credits:

The strategy of buying and selling ‘carbon credits’ can lead to a new form of speculation which would not help reduce the emission of polluting gases worldwide. This system seems to provide a quick and easy solution under the guise of a certain commitment to the environment, but in no way does it allow for the radical change which present circumstances require. Rather, it may simply become a ploy which permits maintaining the excessive consumption of some countries and sectors.”

Nightingale concluded by offering a powerful statement from Pope Francis, “The Earth, our home, is beginning to look more and more like an immense pile of filth.”

Students protest suspension of popular teacher over birth control comment


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

2015-09-29 Ashton 001Students held signs and talked to the media after school today in support of a teacher suspended for his comments about birth control in a tenth grade class.

According to student Layla Vafiadis, English teacher William Ashton was teaching a class on early American literature at the Jacqueline Walsh Arts School for the Performing and Visual Arts (JMW). In a discussion about the Virginians, the Mayflower and William Bradford, Vafiadis asked about the availability of birth control back then. She didn’t think the question was a big deal.

“All that was mentioned was that back then they had a chemical that was used to kill off sperm and that was it. And he said that back then some people might view it as abortion.”

Vafiadis is not mad at whoever made the complaint, but she is angry that one of her favorite teachers may potentially lose his job for answering a question she asked. She wonders why she isn’t allowed to ask certain questions in class.

The students were taken out of class on Monday and into a meeting with Pawtucket Superintendent Patti DiCenso. Students say DiCenso told them they were being inappropriate and shouldn’t be protesting. They were also told they shouldn’t be bullying the student who made the complaint, though that never happened, and the students are only protesting the suspension of William Ashton, not the student who brought the complaint.

Isabelle Long was in the class during the discussion. The comments happened on either a Monday or a Friday, she said. She can’t remember exactly because the comments didn’t make that much of an impact on her. Long says that the class was talking about the Puritans and their conservative beliefs and “how that plays nowadays.”

According to Long, at the meeting the students had with Superintendent DiCenso on Monday, they were told they shouldn’t be protesting and that they were only “harming Mr. Ashton” in doing so. Two students, Maggie Roberts and Hope Norton, were separated from they others and told that they were bullying the other students into protesting.

DiCenso told the students that Ashton had “strayed from the curriculum” but Long asked, “Does the curriculum say what questions we are allowed to ask?”

Hope Norton was one of the two students (the other was Maggie Roberts) who organized the original Bring Back Ashton back in March when he was suspended for his comments about PARCC testing. Hope assumes she and Maggie Roberts were separated from the group because DiCenso is angry about their role in organizing the previous rally. DiCenso has blocked Roberts from accessing her Twitter page. (I have also been blocked.) Given that DiCenso’s Twitter account is @PawtucketSup, an account she uses for outreach to the public in her official capacity as superintendent and not a personal account, the blocking of one of her students is problematic. (Blocking me, on the other hand, is no big deal.)

DiCenso told Norton and Roberts that they were being bullies because they were demanding the return of their teacher and threatening to peacefully protest if he wasn’t reinstated, they said. This is not bullying, this is organizing. One would hope that a superintendent of schools would understand what bullying is and isn’t.

Ashton is, by all reports, an amazingly popular teacher. Norton remembers Ashton telling her that teen pregnancy hurts a young woman’s chances of having a college career. She was not very happy that she was going through this again.

Patti DiCenso’s office will only confirm that a teacher has been placed on paid administrative leave, and will not give the name of the teacher or discuss the nature of the offense.

2015-09-29 Ashton 002

2015-09-29 Ashton 003

2015-09-29 Ashton 004

2015-09-29 Ashton 005

2015-09-29 Ashton 006

2015-09-29 Ashton 007

2015-09-29 Ashton 008

2015-09-29 Ashton 009

Patreon


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387