Record numbers at State House ‘Rally Against Gun Violence’


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Doreen Costa
Doreen Costa

Rally Against Gun Violence 055There were more than 350 people in support of the Rally Against Gun Violence at the State house Thursday afternoon, by far the largest gun control rally in Rhode island’s history. The event was organized by the Rhode Island Coalition Against Gun Violence (RICAGV), made up of over 60 groups representing 100,000 Rhode Islanders.

This year the RICAGV is advocating for three pieces of common sense legislation that seek to make our state safer. The coalition wants to pass legislation to deny guns to domestic abusers, keep guns out of schools, and limit magazine capacity to ten bullets.

Rally Against Gun Violence 050
Mayor Jorge Elorza

Providence Mayor Jorge Elorza was at the rally and in support of the bills. Noting the presence of Teny Gross, executive director of the Institute for the Study and Practice of Nonviolence, Elorza said, “I can’t think of a better slogan than the institute’s ‘Everybody, let’s choose peace.’” Elorza advocated for non-violence training in schools, and asked that people join him in committing “to being preventive rather than reactive to gun violence.”

The rally was emotional at times, with a gripping account by Carmen Cruz, founding member of SOAR, Sisters Overcoming Abusive Relationships. She came to Rhode Island in 1999 to escape an abusive relationship, but her ex-husband found her and shot her in front of her eight-year-old son and her granddaughter. “Domestic abuse and firearms are a terrible combination,” said Cruz.

Rally Against Gun Violence 007
Extraordinary Rendition Band

There was also lighter entertainment, starting with music from the Extraordinary Rendition Band, then Sheryl Albright sang a rousing version of “If I Had a Hammer.”

Myra Latimer-Nichols took to the podium to talk about losing her son, Steven, to senseless gun violence four years ago. Two days short of his 23rd birthday, Latimer-Nichols’ son was outside a club and accidentally leaned on the wrong car. The car’s owner tracked him and his friends down later in the night, and shot them in a drive by. Steven died, leaving his daughter, Nevea, behind.

Rally Against Gun Violence 054
Myra Latimer-Nichols

“The last time I saw him and his daughter together he was telling her about the importance of education,” said his mother, “She was robbed of a life with her father.”

Said Providence Public Safety Commissioner Steven Paré, “Every year we come here to ask for the tools to keep us safe. This is common sense legislation.”

Commenting on the need to limit the number of rounds in guns, Pare said, “If you need a banana clip, you should be hunting, not on the streets of Providence. We won’t give up until we’re there.”

Rally Against Gun Violence 062
Wendy Bowen

Retired school teacher Wendy Bowen spoke next. Bowen was a teacher in Newtown, CT the day a gunman shot and killed six teachers and twenty elementary school children. When her school went into lock down, Bowen and her students, “huddled together in fear, with absolutely no idea what had happened.”

Students have a “right to learn in a safe environment, free of fear. Guns do not belong in school,” said Bowen, “Supporting gun sense laws would save so many lives.”

Doreen Costa
Doreen Costa

Episcopal Bishop Knisely led the crowd in prayer (but included a nice shout-out for random Humanists in the crowd) as Representative Doreen Costa skirted the edge of the crowd taking photos with her phone. Costa has an A+ voting record with the NRA, and is a keen opponent of most legislation that might even slightly inconvenience gun owners.

Sheryl Albright then led a collection of schoolchildren from six different schools in Central Falls in a rendition of “Give Kids a Chance” before the crowd was asked to move inside the State House for a direct appeal to the legislators.

In the main rotunda of the State House, Julia Wyman, legislative director of the RICAGV, made a valiant effort to be heard over the clanging of the bell that calls the legislators to session. She introduced Teny Gross who said that the law should clearly state that guns are not allowed in schools. “When my kids go to school,” said Gross, “I don’t want someone with a license to carry to be in charge of protecting my children.”

Rally Against Gun Violence 084
Mayor James Diossa

The last speaker was Central Falls Mayor James Diossa. Diossa is a member of Mayors Against Illegal Guns. The mayor introduced the Central Falls schoolchildren a final time, and they sang a moving song about Sandy Hook Elementary, a song that mentioned the names of all twenty children who died that day, a tragedy many in our state are trying to prevent from happening again.

Rally Against Gun Violence 001

Rally Against Gun Violence 002

Rally Against Gun Violence 005

Rally Against Gun Violence 006

Rally Against Gun Violence 008

Rally Against Gun Violence 009

Rally Against Gun Violence 010

Rally Against Gun Violence 011

Rally Against Gun Violence 012

Rally Against Gun Violence 013

Rally Against Gun Violence 014

Rally Against Gun Violence 015

Rally Against Gun Violence 016

Rally Against Gun Violence 017

Rally Against Gun Violence 019

Rally Against Gun Violence 020

Rally Against Gun Violence 021

Rally Against Gun Violence 023

Rally Against Gun Violence 024

Rally Against Gun Violence 025

Rally Against Gun Violence 026

Rally Against Gun Violence 027

Rally Against Gun Violence 028

Rally Against Gun Violence 030

Rally Against Gun Violence 031

Rally Against Gun Violence 032

Rally Against Gun Violence 033

Rally Against Gun Violence 034
Sheryl Albright

Rally Against Gun Violence 038

Rally Against Gun Violence 040

Rally Against Gun Violence 041

Rally Against Gun Violence 042

Rally Against Gun Violence 043
Carmen Cruz

Rally Against Gun Violence 045

Rally Against Gun Violence 046

Rally Against Gun Violence 047

Rally Against Gun Violence 048

Rally Against Gun Violence 049

Rally Against Gun Violence 051

Rally Against Gun Violence 052

Rally Against Gun Violence 055

Rally Against Gun Violence 056

Rally Against Gun Violence 057

Rally Against Gun Violence 058

Rally Against Gun Violence 059

Rally Against Gun Violence 060

Rally Against Gun Violence 061
Commissioner Steven Paré
Rally Against Gun Violence 064
Bishop Knisely

Rally Against Gun Violence 066

Rally Against Gun Violence 068

Rally Against Gun Violence 069

Rally Against Gun Violence 070

Rally Against Gun Violence 071

Rally Against Gun Violence 074

Rally Against Gun Violence 075

Rally Against Gun Violence 077

Rally Against Gun Violence 078
Harold Metts

Rally Against Gun Violence 080

Rally Against Gun Violence 081

Rally Against Gun Violence 082
Teny Gross

Rally Against Gun Violence 083

Patreon

The dark art of defending domestic abusers’ right to a gun


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Frank
Frank Saccoccio

When Frank Saccoccio, president of the Rhode Island Second Amendment Coalition and Johnston’s assistant city solicitor, introduced himself to the Senate Judiciary Committee to testify against Senate Bill 503, which would prohibit “any individual convicted of domestic violence or subject to a restraining order from possessing a firearm,” he played up the fact that he does the criminal prosecutions for  Johnston in district court.

He said that he’s “very familiar with the domestic violence issues and what actually comes in front of District Court…” and implied that this was because of his prosecutorial experience. “I’ll try to give you my perspective,” said Saccoccio, “that I see each and every week in the court system…”

Watching a lawyer walk the line between a job that requires him to prosecute perpetrators of domestic violence and a job that requires him to protect the Second Amendment rights of gun owners should have been an interesting experience. No one supports the idea of domestic abusers having access to guns, so the intent of this law was generally thought to be a good thing by everyone. Further, prosecutors generally like laws that make prosecuting wrongdoers easier while at the same time protecting victims from further harm. Yet early on Saccoccio made comments that made it appear he had as much sympathy for those accused of domestic violence as he did for those who claimed to be victims, saying, for instance, “A lot of times you take a look at Family Court judges, they are very, very liberal. They like to err on the side of caution.”

This doesn’t seem like something someone interested in prosecuting domestic abusers might say. What lawyer complains when the judge is on their side?

The jump from talking about district court to family court was also puzzling. Didn’t Saccoccio indicate that his perspective was gleaned from his experience in district court? Now, I’m not a lawyer by any means. I know that lawyers work in a variety of courts and court settings, and that Saccoccio is sure to have a lot of knowledge about the workings of various courts, but is his concern on this issue truly informed by his experience as the assistant town solicitor of Johnston?

I don’t think so.

It seems to me that Saccocio’s perspective on this issue is informed by his work as a lawyer who helps defend, not prosecute, those accused of domestic violence. On the website for his law firm, Comerford & Saccoccio, there is a section about the “increased penalties for crimes committed on family members, spouses or those who share the same household.” The website goes on to say that, “If you have been accused of domestic violence, you can be arrested on the spot. At Comerford & Saccoccio, we will work hard to get you out of jail and immediately begin building your defense.”

In light of this, Saccoccio’s perspective begins to make sense, and it’s no wonder that he would not want to broadcast the basis of his perspective to the Senate committee. Not only is Saccoccio, as the president of the Rhode Island Second Amendment Coalition inclined to fight legislation that might limit access to firearms, he’s also a lawyer that “will work hard” to get clients accused of domestic violence “out of jail immediately.” Testifying against this bill did not require Saccoccio to navigate a difficult line, it simply required him to do what he always does: advocate for gun owners and domestic abusers.

Saccoccio told two stories during his 20 minutes of testimony in which he attempted to highlight how easy it was for innocent men to get caught up in the court system because of domestic violence accusations and the violations of restraining and protective orders.

Everybody here who practices law that knows it is extremely easy to be found in violation of a protective order or restraining order. We have one right now in Johnston, I’ll explain to you the quick facts without saying the name.

“Male and female, the female filed for divorce. She got a protective order in the divorce, probably to get a leg up on it, I’m not sure, then she goes in, as she goes in to drop off the kids,  at the house, he comes out and says, ‘We got to do taxes at the end of the month, I really need the finances.’ Takes the kids and goes into the house. She goes around the corner, calls the police. he gets arrested, he’s charged, and that’s going to trial right now.

“So under this section, that you’ve put in place, that person, if they’re convicted, even if they’re put on probation, would lose their firearms, forever, because they spoke to the other person. No threats, no intimidation, no name calling… asked if he could get the finances so that he could do the taxes at the end of the month. That’s a violation of a protective order and a restraining order. And it’s just that simple.”

We have a seminal case in Rhode Island, State v. Conti and the attorneys that are here understand this. They’re aware of the basis of this. Mr. Conti was walking out of the post office, held the door open for Mrs. Conti, and there was a protective order. As she walked by he said, ‘Hi Liz.’ And she walked in. A day later, she’s driving down the street, he’s going the other way, he waves. She called the police and had him arrested. He was charged, had to go through a trial, and he lost. They said he violated the protective order. That case went to the Rhode Island Supreme Court, and it was overturned. But something as simple as that, ‘How are you doing?’ and you could be right in the middle of this [law], losing your firearms, and you could be convicted of that.”

Certainly everyone accused of a crime deserves a robust defense. And Saccoccio, as a defense attorney, provides an invaluable service representing those accused of domestic violence who, we should all remember, are innocent until proven guilty. That said, our society and our government has an obligation to protect victims of domestic violence, and not having access to your guns while the case is decided is a small price to pay for justice and safety.

This is the line Saccocio was pretending to walk.

The intent of Senate Bill 503 is to save lives. Since Saccoccio likes stories, here’s one he should know: The story of Evelyn Burgos, who lived in Johnston until August 2013. According to the Providence Journal, two weeks after she applied for a restraining order against her ex-boyfriend, she was killed violently – much like she feared. And what actually took place was far worse. Armed with a .357 caliber revolver, her ex-boyfriend shot and killed Burgos and her 25-year-old daughter Vanessa Perez in the presence of her two sons, 2 and 8, and her 3-year-old granddaughter.”

I wrote about the importance of closing the loophole Senate Bill 503 addresses back in January. Here’s the full video of Saccoccio’s testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Patreon

Group seeks to close loophole leaving guns in the hands of domestic abusers


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

gun-controlUnder Federal law, a person “convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic abuse” is banned from owning a gun for life. Yet in Rhode Island, this law is not often prosecuted, leaving weapons in the hands of domestic abusers. Worse, even when this statue is prosecuted by the state, it falls short in several ways.

Under Rhode Island law, domestic abuse includes dating partners as well as married and co-habitating couples. Federal law does not include dating partners. Also, under Federal law, there is no mechanism defined for actually removing guns from the homes of domestic abusers, but there is under Rhode Island law.

Under Rhode Island law § 11-47-5 (b) “…no person convicted of an offense punishable as a felony offense…shall purchase, own, carry, transport or having in his or her possession any firearm, for a period of two years following the conviction.” Often a domestic abuser will plead down their offense from a felony to a misdemeanor, which has the effect of leaving guns in the possession of abusers.

The upshot of this legal maze of federal and state law is that guns too often remain in the hands of domestic abusers, and the statistics on the intersection of guns and domestic abuse are stark. According the the Rhode Island Coalition Against Gun Violence, (RICAGV) between 2001 and 2012 more than 6,410 women were murdered in the United States by an intimate partner using a gun and abused women are five times more likely to be killed if their abuser has access to a gun.

According to the Center for American Progress and the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, “of the 67 female homicide victims in Rhode Island from 2003 to 2012, 27 were the result of a domestic violence incident.”

A study from the Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association, “Batterers’ Use of Guns to Threaten Intimate Partners,” domestic abusers use their guns in many ways as a form of threat. Abusers may threaten to shoot their victim or a person or pet the victim cares about. Abusers may clean, hold, load or even fire a gun during an argument with the victim, driving home their threat without the use of words.

Most gun advocates will agree that guns need to be in the hands of responsible gun owners, not criminals. To that end, the RICAGV is backing legislation that will close the maze of legal loopholes surrounding gun ownership and domestic abuse. The changes in RI § 11-47-5(b) being suggested would:

  1. Reduce the sentence from felony to misdemeanor, thereby forcing domestic abusers to lose the right to their guns,
  2. Increase the ban on possessing firearms from 2 years to lifetime, since domestic abusers are typically repeat offenders and can easily “wait out” a two year restriction, and
  3. Include a clause that would allow persons who have expunged their records, thereby demonstrating that they have reformed themselves, to have their right to firearms reinstated.

A form of this legislation passed the Rhode Island Senate last year unanimously, but died in committee in the House. This year it is hoped that the House has the leadership to pass this common sense legislation out of committee and bring it to the floor for a full vote. Like the legislation that seeks to close the loophole allowing guns in schools, this should be an easy win for gun safety advocates in Rhode Island.

Patreon

Group seeks to close loophole allowing guns in schools


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

gun-controlThe law seems quite clear when RIGL 11-47-60 (a) states that, “No person shall have in his or her possession any kind of firearm or other weapons on school grounds.” But there is a curious exception. Under RIGL 11-47-11 it is stated that a person with a concealed carry permit (CCP) may carry their weapon “everywhere.” Presumably, this means schools.

Which law takes precedence?

Attorney Julia Wyman with the Rhode Island Coalition Against Gun Violence (RICAGV) asked the Rhode Island Attorney General’s office and the Rhode Island Department of Education for clarification, but neither party could “figure out which law prevails,” she said.

The Department of Education has no regulatory authority, and therefore does not have the power to decide on this issue. As a result, legislation is going to be introduced to the General Assembly this year that seeks to clear up any ambiguity in the law, banning weapons from schools, even for those with a CCP.

As it stands now, anyone with a concealed carry permit may bring weapons into schools.

Rhode Island is one of only 18 states that allow guns to be brought in schools, according to a report by NBC News last year. Most of the 18 states on the list require that school officials give permission to bring the weapons into the schools, leaving Rhode Island one of only 5 states in which people may bring guns into schools without the knowledge of police or school officials.

The danger is obvious. In September of last year a teacher in Utah shot herself in the leg when her weapon discharged in class. In Idaho a “state university instructor was wounded in the foot after a concealed handgun in the person’s pocket discharged during a chemistry lab session with students in the room.” In each case, say news reports, the teachers had concealed carry permits.

Though some may argue that since Newtown, some teachers should be armed in the event that children need to be protected from intruders, depending on randomly armed, untrained teachers with CCPs is not a policy. Good policy needs to be vetted and debated so that the full implications might be considered. Policies such as this need to be done right and can’t simply be instituted by taking advantage of defects in a law written decades ago.

The General Assembly has an opportunity to correct this oversight, and should do so this year.

Patreon

A vigil for the 2nd anniversary of Sandy Hook in Providence


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Jerry Belair
Jerry Belair

On Thursday night the Rhode Island Coalition Against Gun Violence and the Religious Coalition for a Violence-Free Rhode Island held its second annual Sandy Hook memorial and vigil, A Voice for Victims, at the First Unitarian Church of Providence. In addition to speakers such as Lisa Pagano, Wendy Bowen and Gladys Brown, who have all lost families and friends to gun violence, speakers included Providence mayor-elect Jorge Elorza, Central Falls Mayor James Diossa, Providence Commissioner of Public Safety Steven Paré, Rabbi Sarah Mack of the Greater Rhode Island Board of Rabbis and the Reverend Don Anderson, of the Rhode Island State Council of Churches.

Sarah Mack
“All human lives are holy…” Rabbi Sarah Mack

The 250 attendees was about double the number who attended last year’s No More Silence vigil. The program ran a little long at 75 minutes, and was heavy on political, religious and law enforcement speakers. The most moving talks were given by those who lives were impacted by gun violence, those who lost loved ones and whose worlds were turned upside down in the time it takes for a trigger to be squeezed.

Coalition President Jerry Belair emceed the event, noting that this was just one of 197 similar events taking place across the country. Belair said that there have been 99 new gun laws passed in 37 states, adding that, “Massachusetts has the lowest gun death rate in the nation because they passed common sense gun control laws that work.”

Lisa Pagano is the executive director of the Lt. Jim Pagano Foundation.  Jim Pagano was shot by his next door neighbor in Cranston, after an argument over an errant tennis ball. The neighbor was upset that the children playing outside during a birthday party allowed the tennis ball to hit his car while they were playing. “What could have been a simple neighborhood dispute,” said Lisa Pagano, “turned deadly because a gun was in the wrong hands.”

“I will never forget that fateful afternoon,” said Gladys Brown, whose son Michael was shot in 2009 at the age of 33, leaving behind two children, “when two Pawtucket police detectives knocked on my door with the most shocking and heartbreaking news a mother could bear…”

Wendy Bowen was a teacher at a Newtown Middle School when a gunman killed 20 students and six teachers next door at Sandy Hook Elementary. She was in lock down with her class, the majority being regular students with some mainstreamed special needs students mixed in, communicating by text message with the outside world as sirens and helicopters filled the air. “Along the way I learned from my sister that the principal of Sandy Hook, a colleague and friend that I knew well, had died along with many children. This was hard for me to hear and not cry, but I could not fall apart in front of my students…”

Providence Public Safety Commissioner Steven Paré spoke briefly about passing wise laws that make it more difficult for guns to get into the wrong hands.

Here’s the full video from the event:

Correction: An earlier version of this piece mistakenly implied that the entirety of Wendy Bowen’s class was special needs students. This has been corrected.



Support Steve Ahlquist!




Providence adds 53 new officers, here’s what the community said to them


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Law Enforcement Community Forum 01It can’t be easy to be a new police officer in the racially and politically charged post-Ferguson era, but yesterday 53 graduates of the Providence Police Training Academy begin their careers.

These young men and women will determine the future of the Providence Police Department for the next 20 or 30 years, so it is very important they get the training right. We need a police department that respects and responds to the community. Last Tuesday night, at the South Providence Boys and Girls Club, the graduates had the opportunity to meet members of the community they will be serving for the first time.

“The community needs law enforcement and law enforcement needs community,” said Providence Police Colonel Hugh Clements, to the 60 or so people who attended the event. “The culture of law enforcement has to change.”

Law Enforcement Community Forum 02Kobi Dennis, organizer and “community guy” introduced the new police officers. “You are going to be on the street soon,” Dennis told the new recruits, then gesturing to the crowd behind him, added, “and these are the people you are going to be seeing.”

Dennis wanted to keep the interaction between police and community positive and avoid turning the event into a series of complaints about the police. After all, these are new recruits, with unblemished records. In many ways this is more than an introduction to the community, this is a fresh start for the Providence Police Department.

But this was a chance for many citizens to explain to the new recruits their perception of the police, which isn’t always positive. For instance, a Latino teenager talked about being harassed by the police simply because of the way he was dressed. Harassment, disrespect and being the object of suspicion simply for being African American or Latino was a recurring theme from the public.

“My daughter is 18,” said an older African American man, “When she’s walking, she doesn’t want to be out with her brothers because they always get harassed [by the police]. Her brothers are supposed to protect her, but she doesn’t want to be out with them.”

A mother stood and talked about watching the police interact with teenagers hanging out in the park across the street from her home. The teenagers in the park are often stopped by the police and instructed to sit on the ground as they are questioned and their backpacks searched.

“What good are our rights if you are violating them?” asked the mother. “Our kids feel the way they do [about the police] because they feel disrespected. They don’t trust you. I’m a black woman. I’ve been pulled over six times in my life for no reason.”

Colonel Clements understood the community’s reaction, and explained that though police officers often have information that leads them to make searches that may seem unwarranted, that doesn’t mean the officers need to be disrespectful while performing their duties. The officers, said Clements, “need to be able to articulate why they are doing what they are doing.”

“I would expect, at least, that you might say, ‘Have a nice day,” added Dennis, to some laughter.

Young people of color are disproportionately more likely to be victims of gun violence in Providence. A woman spoke movingly of losing a teen she was mentoring to a bullet. She told the new officers, “Our kids get shot, yours don’t.”

This is the barrier that separates community and police into us and them. One optimistic young recruit said that he sees his job, in part, as helping to “break down the wall between police and community.” Another new officer added, “We are taught to use our presence and our voice to de-escalate situations.”

A female social worker from the community had some insight on how to get break down the walls that separate police from community. “Be role models and mentors,” she said, “Attend neighborhood events and introduce yourself. Examine the reasons you want to be a cop. If you don’t want to contribute to the wellbeing of our neighborhoods, please step down.”

In addition to questions and dialog around the issue of racial profiling and community engagement, there were some comments of a positive note. “I see a lot of individuals of color [among the recruits] and that’s a good thing,” said one woman from the audience, “Do not forget where you came from.”

To the women among the new officers another audience member said, “Our girls really need to see you in leadership roles.”

In the end this was a positive interaction. There was a lot of optimism from the community and from the new recruits. “I joined because of a positive experience with a police officer in my youth,” said one young officer.

Let’s hope that through respectful, dignified community engagement these new officers can create many more positive experiences for our communities.

Grover Norquist doesn’t actually know much about a ConCon


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

DSC_5283As I listened to Grover Norquist address the crowd of about 80 people at the swanky and exclusive Squantum Association in East Providence on Thursday afternoon, I couldn’t help but wonder if the slick conservative operative knew what he was talking about.

For instance, Norquist attempted to minimize the danger to civil rights that a con-con represents by touting the good government reforms that might spring from such a venture, saying, “I think you will find, as we have in other states…”

What other states is Norquist talking about? There hasn’t been a con-con in any state in this country in 30 years, and the last one was held here in Rhode Island. In that last con-con, there were several constitutional changes suggested (and passed) that directly impacted civil rights. So what is Norquist talking about, when he mentions “other states”?

“Every day that the legislature meets, they form a constitutional convention,” said Norquist, although what that statement could possibly mean is difficult to figure out. And why he thinks this would make Rhode Islanders want to have a con-con is even more difficult to ascertain.

DSC_5289Norquist says that during the process of a con-con, “one or two amendments might become intriguing and important” failing to note that the last time a con-con was held, 22 amendments were bundled into 14 ballot questions. These amendments were all over the place in terms of civil rights restrictions for minorities and women. There is a big difference between two amendments and 22.

At another point in his 13 minute talk Norquist claims, without offering one bit of proof, that a constitutional convention is a “more open process” than the General Assembly. I know of no study that indicates this to be in any way true or provable.

Obviously, Grover Norquist thinks that a con-con is a good idea, he made a special trip to Rhode Island while visiting his parents in Western Massachusetts to make his case on behalf of Mike Stenhouse, Ken Block and the Center for Freedom and Prosperity. But the sense I got from Norquist’s speech isn’t that he supports the con-con out of a love for the power of democracy or a yearning to put the power of government into the hands of average people.

What Norquist and the rest of the con-con supporters seem to be looking for is access to the document that sets the rules for how government functions in our society. The normal avenues of power are closed to Norquist and Stenhouse: Voters routinely reject candidates, such as Ken Block (who was also a speaker at this event) because they rightly sense that these candidates do not represent the interests of the public. Meanwhile, the General Assembly has been cool to the Center for Freedom and Prosperity’s radical ideas, such as eliminating the sales tax without finding a revenue stream to replace it.

But if Stenhouse and his coalition can crack open the constitution and take to it with scissors and markers, they can possibly create the kind of government that responds better to the crank economic theories his center espouses. These won’t be temporary changes to the constitution either. As Norquist says, a con-con “elevates the debate from who win and who lose this week to ‘what are the rules for the next hundred years.’”

Stenhouse, Norquist and Block repeatedly point out that fears of attacks on civil rights are overblown, and in one sense they are right because rich white men almost never face serious challenges to their civil rights.

Just the prospect of a constitutional convention in Rhode Island has outside money and special interests sharpening their knives in anticipation. Grover Norquist and his extreme right-wing  ideology are just the tip of the spear.

Sandy Hook parents speak out against gun violence


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Po Murray (file photo)

Mark Barden, whose seven year old son Daniel was murdered along with nineteen classmates and six teachers at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, spoke at the first annual fundraiser for the Rhode Island Coalition Against Gun Violence last night in Barrington. A self described guitarist and dad, Barden didn’t think much about gun violence before the tragedy that took his son’s life.

“I wasn’t engaged. I didn’t know about this. I didn’t think it could happen.”

There’s barely a dry eye in the room while Barden speaks. His story is heartbreaking. He passes around a picture of his children, and I can’t look at it for too long before I pass it along. It’s overwhelming. Daniel was Barden’s youngest, a bright and kind kid who should be starting second grade and turning nine this year.

“I’m not proud to say it changed my life,” says Barden, “Now that I know what I know, I wish I had been engaged…”

Representative David Cicilline began the evening, describing a Congress that responds with unconcern towards horrific news stories of gun violence. Every shooting, says Cicilline makes us think that “this will be the moment” when common sense gun laws can be passed, but nothing, not the murder of twenty children, not even the shooting of one of their own, Representative Gabby Giffords, can move an apathetic Congress to action. “The only way to make progress on this issue,” says Cicilline, “is through organizations like this.”

10704116_333857833460999_3256896599437337077_nThis is the Rhode Island Coalition Against Gun Violence, which started as a response to the Newtown shootings as an offshoot of Moms Demand Action, but quickly snowballed into a statewide coalition of thirty groups and 30,000 members. The coalition is still growing, with more groups showing interest every month. This is a coalition dedicated to passing common sense gun legislation favored my a majority of voters, not repealing the Second Amendment.

Even as violent crime overall continues to drop, gun violence and deaths from guns remain pretty constant, with about 32,000 victims each year. Smart laws that keep guns out of the wrong hands will help to stem the tide. “We have the responsibility and the ability to reduce gun violence considerably,” said Cicilline.

Po Murray is a mother and a resident of Newtown. She helped to found the Newtown Action Alliance. Her neighbor was the killer who entered Sandy Hook Elementary and shot Mark Barden’s son, along with 19 other children. Needless to say, her community is still healing, and may never be fully whole. Newtown was once considered to be one of the safest cities in the United States. “If a horrific mass shooting can occur in my town,” says Murray, “it can happen anywhere.”

“The NRA (National Rifle Association) puts gun company profits ahead of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness,” says Murray, adding that Wayne LaPierre, the president of the NRA, “enraged us” when he declared that the only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.

“My daughter (Natalie) asked, “How do we know who the bad guys are?’” says Mark Barden, “My son James asked if there’s anything we can do to save another family from this.”

To honor his son’s memory, Barden did the only thing he could do. Get engaged.

“We worked hard and closed the pessimism gap,” says Murray, making Connecticut second in the nation for gun safety laws as a result of their efforts. “We are hoping that Rhode Island will join Connecticut and Massachusetts for a safer New England.”

Guns: Our uniquely American inheritance


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

we people gunThe capacity for violence that was the midwife of our nation is turning upon itself. What are we to do about our guns?

I have a gun problem. And so do you. I have a love of guns, but you probably don’t. I don’t own a single gun, but you might.

When my father died, he left me nothing but a broken down truck and a beautiful gun-safe full of guns in the far off land of Las Vegas, Nevada. I was off to Afghanistan when he died, and I was back from war when I chose not to accept my uniquely American inheritance. Only in America would such an inheritance be possible – or more importantly – applauded by many. I passed.

My father’s slow death was a tragic and fucked up experience for me, but it ended up being a special parting gift from my father. In dying, he inadvertently prepared me for the incredible bullshit on the horizon. Dad withered slowly over the course of many months, and yet he did miraculously get the timing right; I happened to be stationed in the deserts of California, not far from my old man – close enough that we could spend his last days together. His death was a final lesson, and I think Dad would be happy to have his son say that he died teaching him a lesson – even if that lesson was to do something entirely different with my life.

After whatever training the Marine Corps and Navy hefted on me and fellows, I’d scurry away as fast as I could from my temporary home in Twenty-Nine Palms, California, hopping in a cheap rental car and roaring the solemn 3 1/2 hour drive across old Route 66,  and then on upwards to Las Vegas. I think I made this drive over a dozen times in the months leading up to the end, listening to satellite radio, chatting with far away friends, and crying. I’d pull in to my father’s rental home, a cheap spot in a a deeply Hispanic side of town. (There’s a Sinaloa chicken joint nearby that I highly recommend to you.) I parked next to his busted, camouflaged International Scout II, which sat alongside a neglected motor home once-purposed to take his best friends to the drag races.

Dad kept his friends close. Close enough that he gave a few of them the combination to his gun safe, for emergencies’ sake.

Now, this is Las Vegas. This is a place full of vice, and full of shifty real-world friends.

So, just weeks before my Dad died, he had a pistol stolen from him. It was a nice one,  a 9mm Glock that was relatively new to his arsenal and which he was especially prideful to own. I was present at the moment he realized it was missing. He was skeletal at this time, and had gotten up to show me something in his safe that I ought to know was important (I think it was paperwork.) At that point, he realized something was amiss, shuffled around a few things, and then suddenly shuffled around everything. He was afraid, exasperated, and finally heartbroken.

I was incapable of doing a damn thing, which meant that I said something like “its okay.” It wasn’t. My dad was right that it wasn’t. The whole fucking point of the safe, and of friends, and the guns, was to be safe, and to protect loved ones. Whoever fucking stole his gun obviously didn’t get the point. But, that’s not what my dad said. He collapsed on the bed after a few hours of grief. His grief wasn’t that life was ending for him, since he was a fighter and certainly not willing to admit that at the time, but was instead grieved that there were only a few choice friends who could have stolen that damned gun, and all of them were well-loved. But were they trustworthy? No. There was at least one that was an addict, maybe more. At least one that could have stolen it. How did he know? Because the gun was gone.

It is difficult for me when I talk to my friends, acquaintances and strangers about their firearms. Often I don’t tell them my father’s story, but when I do, it is because they are new to owning guns. They are usually happy to get their first, but at a loss as to how to deal with the seriousness of owning weaponry. They buy into the many responsible ways to mitigate the danger, as my father did. My father, for all his faults, was a reasonable gun owner. On the other hand, many friends initially just chuck their new AR-15 in a closet, hopefully with some kind of locking mechanism, and hope for the best. My dad did this for nearly 20 years and never had a problem. Ironically, even after doing the right thing and getting the safe, he still had that handgun stolen.

The firearms in question never came into my possession, nor were they even technically willed to me. I wasn’t up for owning them in the first place. But even if I was, the laws and paperwork would have likely been too byzantine for me to have navigated them. I often wonder whether it would have been worth getting the gun safe, just to give it to a friend who could use it. I wonder even more, after having seen a few people shot in Afghanistan, whether it is that 9mm Glock, and not any tens of thousand of others, that was picked up in a Nevada pawnshop and used to put a hole in some child somewhere. I often wonder whether or not anyone takes their rights seriously, anymore. I wonder whether culture, and not commerce or law, can make a difference to make these many tragedies less likely.

I’m a Second Amendment guy. I’m a First Amendment guy. Worthless statements, but worthy in action. I do not use the 2nd Amendment (I will not own a gun,) but I support the rights of others to own guns. I’d just rather they didn’t. I do use the greatest invention of the previous millenium – the right to speak and be heard freely. I am far more proud to be a loud-mouth, than a gun owner. As someone who has spent far more time wondering what to do about a bullet-wound than what to do with a gun, I wonder whether or not people are ever going to fight nearly as hard for healing and prevention.

Submitting to the majority is not the American way of life. For those who hate guns, more power to you.

NAACP lays out five point plan to reduce gun violence


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

“Yesterday we gave out hotdogs and hamburgers at Chad Brown,” said speaker Kobi Dennis, of Project Night Vision and other programs aimed at curbing inner city violence, “That was fun, but guess what? That was for the kids. This is grown-up time right now.”

Jim Vincent, RI NAACP
Jim Vincent, RI NAACP

Grown-up time means Jim Vincent, president of the Rhode Island NAACP, calling a news conference on the steps of the Garrahy Judicial Complex in response to a drive-by shooting in Chad Brown late Tuesday night in which five people were injured. The NAACP, in consultation with other neighborhood groups, issued a “Call to Action,” demanding that Providence Mayor Angel Taveras call a leadership conference to discuss solutions to a problem that is putting families and children at risk.

Kobi Dennis
Kobi Dennis

In addition to the leadership conference the NAACP also called upon Governor Chafee  to direct the Governor’s Workforce Board “to establish targeted workforce development programs” in neighborhoods with high unemployment. As bad as the unemployment crisis in Rhode Island seems to be, in certain communities the unemployment rate is as high as 40%.

Vincent also wants Mayor Taveras to “evaluate the Providence Recreation Department to determine its effectiveness in providing recreation and youth development services to increase its relevancy.” Giving kids something to do can keep them off the streets, out of trouble and out of harm’s way. The cost of doing this is always less than the cost of bullets ripping through bodies.

Vincent also wants 15% of the Google settlement money. This would provide about $30 million “to support youth development and ex-offender training and employment programming,” a real investment in our communities.

Lastly, the NAACP wants the Public Safety Commission to “establish a community liaison to connect high crime neighborhoods with the police department to help prevent wars and provide mediation support.”

Not in attendance Monday afternoon were Mayor Taveras, who is running for Governor, or Governor Chafee, who has declined to run for reelection. Gubernatorial candidate Clay Pell attended, as did Providence Mayoral candidates Brett Smiley and Jorge Elorza. Republican candidate for Attorney General, Dawson Hodges, was also on hand.

One wonders why Taveras declined to attend. What did he have to do that was more important than listening to citizens of his city with proposed solutions to the violence tearing through our communities? Taveras was present the day before, speaking to the crowd at the Community Cook-Out, but that event was for the kids, right? The violence in Chad Brown and elsewhere in Providence is a problem that should concern us statewide. The person who leads the state, who wants to sit at the head of the adult table, needs to be able to show real leadership in times of crisis.

And that means, at the very least, showing up.

DSC_3127

DSC_3146

DSC_3160

DSC_3169

DSC_3183

DSC_3188

DSC_3191

DSC_3194

DSC_3200

DSC_3209

DSC_3223

DSC_3238

DSC_3245

DSC_3250

DSC_3253

DSC_3257

DSC_3263

DSC_3271

DSC_3278

DSC_3284

DSC_3294

DSC_3298

Fighting bullets with hot dogs


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

DSC_2694Too often we in Providence, and more broadly we in Rhode Island, react to the gun violence tearing apart our communities as an issue specifically confined to the inner city.

The problem does not impact the vast majority of us, because we don’t live in the projects, and our concern is only brought to bear if the victim tugs at our hearts, as in the case of Aynis Vargas, the twelve year old killed last year at a party outside her apartment or if the crime is particularly careless and violent, as in the drive by shooting that rocked the Chad Brown section of Providence last Tuesday night. Five people were hospitalized, fortunately no one was killed.

DSC_2675The problem of gun violence in our neighborhoods is a problem for all of Rhode Islanders. The safety of all our children is of paramount importance, and in a state so small there is no way to pretend that the problem is too far away or too intractable for us to make a difference. If Rhode Island can come together as one community with a willingness to make real, substantive changes in the way we deal with poverty, crime, violence and guns, we can and will improve the lives of all our brothers and sisters.

DSC_2853I was pleased to hear about Diana Garlington’s Community Cook-Out for Non-Violence, held in the Chad Brown Projects and described as “an informal event” where “anyone whose life has been impacted by violence will have the opportunity to speak” and”everyone is invited.” I was pleased to see people from South Providence, the East Side and other parts of Providence gather in peace and celebration at an event where children were playing, neighbors were laughing and food was shared.

DSC_2791Officers were on hand from both the state and Providence Police, and of course, this being an election year, the candidates were out pleading their cases to the crowd. Mayor Taveras made a last-hour appearance and spoke briefly to the crowd. Sighted at the event were mayoral candidates Brett Smiley, Michael Solomon and Jorge Elorza. In addition to Taveras, gubernatorial candidate Gina Raimondo and candidate for State Secretary Nellie Gorbea were the statewide candidates in attendence. Several members of the Providence City Council and some of their opponents were on hand as was House candidate Aaron Regunberg, but conspicuous by their absence were the vast majority of the General Assembly, including Speaker Mattiello and Senate President Paiva-Weed. Under their leadership the General Assembly seems unable to acknowledge, never mind deal with the issue of gun violence.

DSC_2725But this was not a political event. This was a community event, designed to bring people together in peace so as to begin changing the conversation around violence and community. Several times people told me that events like this need to be held on a regular basis, not just in reaction to some tragic event. Moreover, leaders and members of communities throughout Rhode Island need to start making time in their schedules to attend these events. It’s only by going to these events and meeting the residents that we can learn that the people here want exactly what we all want: a safe place to raise our children.

This was a great event, and I hope to cover more of these, under better circumstances, in the future.

DSC_2000

DSC_2670

DSC_2671

DSC_2673

DSC_2676

DSC_2677

DSC_2685

DSC_2688

DSC_2692

DSC_2698

DSC_2700

DSC_2708

DSC_2711

DSC_2722

DSC_2727

DSC_2730

DSC_2731

DSC_2732

DSC_2735

DSC_2739

DSC_2740

DSC_2743

DSC_2747

DSC_2750

DSC_2754

DSC_2757

DSC_2759

DSC_2762

DSC_2764

DSC_2771

DSC_2782

DSC_2785

DSC_2789

DSC_2792

DSC_2796

DSC_2801

DSC_2803

DSC_2805

DSC_2807

DSC_2817

DSC_2821

DSC_2828

DSC_2830

DSC_2836

DSC_2838

DSC_2843

DSC_2844

DSC_2845

DSC_2847

DSC_2856

DSC_2858

DSC_2862

DSC_2865

DSC_2867

DSC_2868

DSC_2871

DSC_2873

DSC_2876

DSC_2881

DSC_2887

DSC_2888

DSC_2891

DSC_2892

DSC_2900

DSC_2901

DSC_2904

DSC_2906

DSC_2914

DSC_2921

DSC_2925

DSC_2933

DSC_2941

DSC_2947

DSC_2949

DSC_2950

DSC_2967

DSC_2976

DSC_2986

DSC_2993

DSC_2994

DSC_2995

DSC_2997

DSC_3001

DSC_3004

DSC_3010

DSC_3011

DSC_3017

DSC_3045

DSC_3047

DSC_3050

DSC_3068

DSC_3112

DSC_3114

Cicilline promotes National ASK Day to prevent gun violence


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

DSC09607Congressman David Cicilline held a press conference this morning in Lippitt Park in Providence ahead of National ASK Day (June 21), a day organized nationally by the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence and supported locally by the Rhode Island Coalition Agains Gun Violence (RICAGV).

ASK (Asking Saves Kids) aims to reduce unintentional firearm deaths and injury to children by encouraging parents to ASK, “Is there an unlocked gun in your house?” just as they would other health & safety questions, before their child visits another home. The ASK Campaign was created by the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence in collaboration with the American Academy of Pediatrics. National ASK Day takes place every year on the first day of summer, as summer is a time when children are increasingly likely to be playing in other homes. ASK Day is on June 21st.”

DSC09624Moving and emotional testimony was given by Karen Reed, a mother who, two years ago, nearly lost her five year old son to a terrible gun accident when her nine year old son found an unsecured pellet gun on Christmas Eve, and shot his brother in the eye, nearly killing him. Not only was one son grievously injured, but the other was forced to deal with the trauma and guilt of having accidentally caused so much harm. Yet who can blame a nine year old boy for such an accident? Isn’t it the responsibility of adults to secure weapons in the household?

Full press conference:

Attacked on Facebook by an alleged lobbyist


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

gunnutEarly Sunday morning (about 1am), I received an unsolicited Facebook-Messenger attack. I can only imagine it was a response to my most recent opinion piece on the hearing befor Senate Finance on the 10% supplemental excise tax on guns and ammunition. Although, I cannot be certain. What I am certain of, however, is the remarkably angry tone and insensitive absence of logic, slung at me by a complete stranger was completely unprovoked.

In retrospect, I probably should have completely ignored it. In the future I will refrain from being baited into such pointless exercises. Maybe it was exhaustion or simply my own lack of self control, but I foolishly engaged in the dialogue and was so shocked by this person’s incapacity for civil discourse that I had to share it.

As a disclaimer, I am a progressive political operative. I make no attempt to hide the fact that I prioritize people over profits. However, I am far from radical. I tend to work within the system and, while my progressive values and personal integrity prevent me from keeping still and silent when I feel strongly about an issue, I make every attempt to accept opinions that differ from mine.

But, in the dead of night, when my smart phone chimed with unwarranted vitriol, spewed from a complete stranger who, like any well practiced bully, picks a fight by finding sensitive pressure points, I took the bait.

Here is the actual Facebook Messenger conversation. I added some personal commentary and removed the name of the individual to maintain privacy. I also blurred the photograph. However, everything else is copied, unedited, as it occurred.

The stranger’s voice appears under the blurred photo. My voice appears in bold face type. Commentary is in italics.

The Constitution has been clear for 227 years.  Maybe you should grab a  copy  of  “Constitution For Dummies” (cliff note version) …maybe Barnes and Noble could special order you one.

The Constitution has not been clear for 227 years. If it had been, we would not need a Supreme court to interpret and render decisions. Pick up a copy of a GED online, since you haven’t bothered to pay attention in civics. Don’t contact me again.

Every decision protects what it stands for

You can write all the garbage you’d like….

I know. See amendment # 1.

Yes unfortunately we have to tolerate nonsense

I addition to all the corruption in this state

No. I can block you. Bye, psycho.

Yeah I’ll see you at the state house

Asshole

Is that a threat? If so, I will contact the state police.

I’m a lobbyist for tax paying citizens

If this person is a lobbyist, he/she is not registered as such with the Secretary of State in Rhode Island.

Do you feel threatened?? Good

So am I. The police have been contacted. Please wait by your door.

So, I lied here. I did not contact the police. I was tired and trying to express that communication of threats is a crime.

Whatever

Excellent argument.

Can’t debate with an idiot liberal… They start whining

When you want to have a real debate id LOVe to

Can’t argue with crazy. I’m busy organizing.

The classic response

You know crazy you walk through it’s doors every day . Night

Okay, put the needle down and seek some rehab, sugar.

I got mean here. I shouldn’t have insinuated that the person was an intravenous drug user. I’ve known many who suffer from addiction and their condition should not be minimized by using it as an insult.

 

That’s for the illegals to take care of

You know you give them the ok….

I don’t even know what your talking about. Can you please stop typing and crawl back to the cave you came from. I don’t know you or care what you think. I’ve never heard of you. I don’t want to hear from you again. Please cease and desist your unsolicited harassment of me. Nobody cares about your ideas or opinions.

Can’t wait to share this

Nobody cares. Grow up.

Oh, they will.

At this point I made good on my threat to block the person.

I am trying not to form generalizations based on this encounter. My hope is that this incident does not represent the majority of right-wing, conservatives. I assume this person to be a right-wing conservative only because of the disparraging description of me as an “idiot liberal.”  He or she does not appear to be liberal, so I do not think he or she thinks of his or herself as a smart liberal and is simply pointing out my stupidity. I also hope that this person is not actually a lobbyist for taxpayers. I pay taxes. I don’t want to be represented by an unregistered bigot.

However, the ominous (or hilarious) church bell finale to the conversation left me wondering if this is the sort of red flag that should be noticed prior to an incidence of domestic terrorism. I’m going to choose to laugh this one off. But, one never knows.

Senate Finance scoffs at ‘guns and ammo tax’


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

we people gunThe members of the Senate Committee on Finance had already made up their minds to dismiss any potential value offered by the proposed legislation long before Senator Gayle Goldin, the bill’s prime sponsor, explained it.

Senate Bill 2318 would impose a 10% supplemental excise tax on firearms and ammunition to be distributed to city, town, or municipal police chiefs (or the highest ranking municipal official) for the purpose of grant funding of nonprofit organizations whose mission includes a commitment to reducing crime and violence.

Committee Vice Chairman Walter Felag (D-Bristol, Tiverton, Warren) made it clear he had little respect for the bill and it’s sponsor when he repeatedly said that every senator is entitled to a hearing of his or her bill, but that doesn’t mean anyone at the table supports it. He also chastised Senator Goldin, in absentia, for leaving the hearing after explaining the bill, in spite of the fact that half of the members of his own committee were absent to work on budget issues.

Out in force was the usual shoot ‘em if ya got ‘em crowd, including 2nd Amendment Coalition lobbyist and unemployment insurance attorney Frank Saccoccio, NRA lobbyist Darin Goens, talk-show radio host Daria Bruno, Cranston Mayor Allan Fung and relentlessly obnoxious member of the tin-foil hat press, Dan Bidondi.

Saccoccio started his testimony by positing that the most important part of any legislation is the language that is not there. I’m no lawyer but I am fairly certain that the most important part of legislative language is, more often than not, the language that is there. However, Saccoccio chose to focus on a list of hypothetical scenarios having nothing to do with the actual bill or its potential merits.

“What if the police chief chose to give the money to an organization that spent 10% on a billboard and 90% on administrative costs and taxpayers’ money was wasted? What if, in a state with such high unemployment, gun dealers were forced to go out of business because everyone purchased their guns in Massachusetts?”

Well, I suppose the displaced workers could go to work for the nonprofits who are spending so much money on their staff. But, unfortunately, logic did not have a seat at this table, in spite of the many vacant chairs.

NRA lobbyist, Goens, said that he’s seen, “literally thousands,” of gun control bills and that “this was in the top five of the worst he’d ever seen.” I, myself, am a lobbyist. I understand the craft. Hyperbole is not usually the friend of the lobbyist. Furthermore, I am willing to bet that Goens has used this very phrase on literally hundreds of the literally thousands of gun bills against which the NRA stands. He then went on to give the not-so-subtle impression that, even though he represents the NRA and not the gun manufacturers (wink, nudge), if the bill passed, gun manufacturers might just stop selling guns and ammo to security or law enforcement in Rhode Island. I wonder if he submitted written testimony or a ransom note.

Fung testified that he was the only candidate to stand up for Rhode Islander’s second amendment rights. He’s Alan Fung and he approves this message. Lock, Stock and Daria Bruno went so far as to call the bill blatantly racist because it disenfranchises poor people of color who most need guns for self-defense. I know. I’m dry heaving too. And Bidondi … well, he just yelled from the gallery at anyone who testified in favor of the bill.

And we few … we happy few. We band of brothers (and sisters) who testified in favor of the bill were raked over the coals by the members of the committee. We were cross-examined as if we were proposing a bill to seize and sacrifice the first born child of every family. Or tax their guns.

Senator David Bates (R-Barrington, Bristol), showing blatant disrespect for his fellow Senator Goldin, asked her whether we should have a knife tax too? Senator Goldin kept her composure. I would have pointed out that nobody has, to my knowledge, assassinated a president from a grassy knoll by throwing knives. Also, one very rarely hears of a drive-by knifing.

Providence Mayoral Candidate Brett Smiley, (for whose campaign, in the spirit of full disclosure, I consult) was questioned by Senator Edward O’Neill (I-Lincoln, North Providence, North Smithfield) about  whether Rhode Island should start taxing alcohol too? (Nobody tell Representative Malik he said that!) O’Neill went on to ask why legal gun purchases should be taxed when it is stolen guns that result in gun crimes. Smiley answered that every gun begins as a legal sale. Gun manufacturers do not manufacture guns for illegal sale. By taxing at the point of sale, funds could be collected. The point that Senator O’Neill refused to acknowledge was that funding streams for violent crime prevention was very difficult to come by if one only taxed stolen guns.

The overwhelming arguments revolved (and revolved, and revolved) around a premise that this was a tax that punished law abiding citizens, simply executing their second amendment rights, rather than addressing the real issue, which is criminals who steal guns. However, my own testimony addressed the fact that this did not infringe upon anyone’s right to keep and bear arms. It merely requires that those who make the choice to do so also invest in a responsible future. Taxes are not punitive. Taxes are a civic responsibility and an investment in community.

I was given a fair amount of eye rolling when I listed just a few incidents from the past three days, involving a 70-year old Ohio woman accidentally shot by her husband of 50 years; a three year old in Arizona who accidentally shot his 1 ½ year old brother fatally in the head; a 10-year-old in Texas, who accidentally shot his 4-year-old cousin in the leg. All of these tragedies made possible by legally purchased firearms. Perhaps a funding stream, at the discretion of law enforcement leadership, could be dedicated to educating the public on responsible gun ownership. Or, would that too be considered an infringement on one’s right to keep and bear arms?

This bill has, for all intents and purposes, died in committee. But it is an excellent idea. Take the bill out of judiciary and make it a tax issue before finance. Do not control guns. Rather, fund nonviolence at the legal point of sale. Yet, the Dan Bidondi mentality seems to have permeated the General Assembly. The Senate, anyway, did not entertain the potential for trying something different to achieve a better result. Instead they simply cried “Why do you want to punish law abiding citizens? Why do you hate the second amendment?” I, for one, don’t. I want to honor the preamble to the Constitution, which includes the phrase: “promote the general welfare.”

Senate committee considers ‘Guns and ammo tax’ today


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Goldin SmileyImagine how much safer Rhode Island would be if police departments and nonviolence nonprofits were incentivized to work together to reduce gun violence? The Senate Finance Committee will consider a bill today that would do exactly that.

Known as the guns and ammo tax, the legislation would put an additional 10 percent tax on the sale of all guns and ammunition in Rhode Island. It’s expected to raise $2 million, which would go to local police departments based on the amount of gun violence in each city and town. Local police departments would disperse the money to area nonprofits that organize against gun violence.

The Senate Finance Committee hearing is at 3pm today.

The Senate version is sponsored by Gayle Goldin and the House version by Maria Cimini. It was co-authored by Providence mayoral candidate Brett Smiley, who has pledged to make Providence the safest city of it’s size in the nation.

“It helps our police departments, it helps our nonprofits, and it helps every citizen of our state who sees the detrimental cost of gun violence each day,” said Smiley in a press release today.

Here’s Steve Alhquist’s Feb. 6 post of Smiley and Goldin announcing the legislation.

Some perspective on Josh Miller’s “Go F- yourself” moment


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Dan BidondiIn 2004, Vice President Dick Cheney told Senator Patrick Leahy to “Go fuck yourself” in response to Leahy’s criticisms over Cheney’s Halliburton war profiteering. Later the same week, Cheney said he didn’t regret cursing at the Senator on the Senate floor, and even as recently as 2010 said of telling off Leahy, “That’s sort of the best thing I ever did.”

I think Cheney set a pretty low bar for “best thing ever,” but sadly, given his record, he might be right. But I digress.

Yesterday Dan Bidondi (to be played by Michael Chiklis in the movie version of this story) posted a video on Info Wars where Rhode Island State Senator Josh Miller (and a local photographer) told him to “Go fuck yourself.”

Bidondi reacted with mock outrage, editing the video in such a way as to leave out the part where he is harassing people in the State House with idiotic questions. Bidondi’s behavior and conduct were deplorable that day, and when I called him on his behavior (using words much more polite than “Go fuck yourself”) he told me that he was a member of the press and was exercising his right to free speech. He proudly displayed his Info Wars press credentials.

Bidondi is a member of the press, and he has the First Amendment right to free speech. So does Senator Miller, of course, but Miller is also a better person than Bidondi (or Dick Cheney, for that matter) because after due consideration, Miller apologized for his behavior, saying, “Regardless of the emotions and atmosphere of the moment, it does not justify the language I used that day. Out of respect for the decorum of the State House and the constituents I represent, I offer my apologies.”

No such apology seems forthcoming from Bidondi.

Info Wars and Bidondi represent the very worst of the right wing Internet. Comments on Bidondi’s Josh Miller post number in the hundreds and are filled with anti-semitism, thinly veiled death threats and racism. Reading them is stomach churning.

BR549 said, “I thought this clown looked Jewish, ……. and sure enough, after a bit of digging, there it was. So we have yet another arrogant Jewish leftard progressive in office, who has to lie through his teeth on his FaceBook page to try to convince everyone that Dan BiDondi is a basher of elderly veterans.”

Earl Scheib said, tactfully, “He needs to be Trotsky’d” by which I assume he means “hit in the head with an icepick.”

Joel Bensonetti observed that, “Josh Miller looks a lot like Pol Pot, only white.”

These are some of the tamer examples.

Anyone who has dealt with Dan “false flag” Bidondi knows that he is not a honest player in the public debate, that he intentionally mocks and goads the people he stalks for impromptu interviews, that he espouses any inane conspiracy theory that pops into his head, and that he actively courts exactly the amount of respect he deserves.

Senator Miller may have lost his cool but he apologized to his constituents and the citizens of Rhode Island, not to Bidondi and not to that hotbed of racism, misogyny and anti-semitism called Info Wars.

I think that’s appropriate.

Watch the highlights: Rhode Island Coalition Against Gun Violence at State House

Gun Control 01Jerry Belair, president of the Rhode Island Coalition Against Gun Violence asked the following question, “Rhode Island law limits the number of rounds to five when hunting deer. Rhode Island law limits the number of rounds to three when hunting ducks. If we can limit the number of rounds in a firearm to protect dear and ducks, how can we not limit the number of rounds to protect our children and citizens?”

Referring to the crowd that filled the main rotunda under the dome of the Rhode Island State House to advocate for sensible gun control, State Senator Josh Miller said, “This is what a majority looks like… A majority is a wide coalition…” that voted “in Exeter over two to one in favor of people who favor gun legislation.”

Shortly after her election to the Rhode Island House, Representative Linda Finn was contacted by Carl Cunningham Sr., who told her the story of his son, Carl Jr., who was killed the year before. “Carl was shot by a jealous ex-boyfriend of a friend he was visiting,” says Finn, “He wasn’t the intended target, he was just in the wrong place at the wrong time.”

“By a two to one margin, Rhode Islanders want to ban assault weapons. We have a very small percentage of gun owners in this state, less than 13%. It’s time for us to act, it’s time to do what the majority of Rhode Islanders want us to do, which is to ban assault weapons ban high magazine capacity and get our domestic violence laws in line with Federal laws.”

Nan Heroux calls herself an “accidental activist” motivated by a need to help protect “her grandchildren and yours” as a member of Moms Demand Action.

Gun Control 02

Gun Control 03

Gun Control 04

Gun Control 05

Gun Control 06

Gun Control 07

Gun Control 08

Gun Control 09

Gun Control 10

Sam Bell

Gun Control 12

Teny Gross: Does the gun lobby have a racial problem?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Teny Gross 01
Teny Gross

Teny Gross, Executive Director of the Institute for the Study & Practice of Nonviolence, did not pull any punches yesterday as he spoke to a crowd gathered under the dome of the Rhode Island State House about class, race and gun violence. Guns are the leading cause of death for young black men and it’s the second leading cause of death for young men in general in the United States, according to Gross.

“I’m not a prophet,” said Gross, “but I will make a very sure prediction today. You can take it to Wall St. and bank on it. There will be another Sandy Hook. There will be many more Sandy Hooks in the United States. It is partially, in large part, because of the proclivity and the looseness and the stubbornness of a small group of leaders in the NRA and their local supporters. I recommend to the NRA members that are here: Start thinking about a compromise. This is not about the Second Amendment. No right is absolute.”

Gross had some tough words for Representative Doreen Costa, who at the time was outside the State House at the anti-common sense gun laws rally.

“The one comment from last year that really rings in my head and it was recently reawakened is Representative Costa saying at a hearing that [gun violence] doesn’t happen in Exeter, [gun violence] happens in the inner city. Recently a letter to the newspaper… also said this violence is an inner city problem. Last I checked, the inner city is part of the United States of America and they’re citizens.”

“I have a question,” asked Gross, putting it all out on the table, “Does the gun lobby have a racial problem? Let’s put the elephant right here in the room.”

Not compromising on reasonable gun legislation and refusing to work with law enforcement suggests that, “you think that your children are not dying, it’s other children. Are some Americans worth less if their skin color is darker?… On some streets it’s okay when there’s death and some streets it’s not okay? Some children dying is okay and some children dying is not okay? Tell us? This is an open question.”

“Let’s be honest,” continued Gross, “Sandy Hook got a lot of press partially because it was white kids in a privileged community.”

Teny Gross 03

Teny Gross 02

Newtown Action Alliance’s Po Murray: It can happen anywhere


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Newtown Action Alliance Po Murray
Po Murray, Newtown Action Alliance

Vice-chair and co-founder of Newtown Action Alliance Po Murray gave a moving speech at the State House yesterday about living in the aftermath of an unspeakable tragedy like that which occurred at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, Connecticut on December 14, 2012. Murray spoke of the devastation wrought in under five minutes by a man wielding a “lethal killing machine, the AR-15.” Twenty children and six educators died that day.

“Our hearts broke into a million pieces and our community was shattered,” said Murray, “but many of us felt the need to move swiftly to take action to honor the lives lost.”

Murray has lived in the Sandy Hook section of Newtown for over 14 years, in one of the safest neighborhood in Connecticut. The shooter, with a stock pile of weapons and ammunition, lived 50 yards from her home. Murray’s four children all graduated from Sandy Hook Elementary School.

“I am not able to leave my neighborhood without driving past numerous homes of the families who have lost their children on December 14th,” she said. “Our community is still reeling from the massacre. There has been a huge human and economic cost associated with moving the community forward.”

Murray implored the legislature to pass new and effective gun control measures because, “if a mass shooting with a lethal machine with a high capacity magazine can happen in my town, it can happen anywhere.”

Po Murray 01

Po Murray 02

Rev. Gene announces Religious Coalition for a Violence-Free Rhode Island


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Reverend Gene
Reverend Gene Dyszlewski

The Reverend Gene Dyszlewski, a prominent religious figure in the battle for marriage equality, welcomed the arrival of a “new conversation about gun violence” at the State House yesterday with the announcement of the formation of the Religious Coalition for a Violence-Free Rhode Island (RCVFRI).

This is a group of about 80 (and growing) religious leaders from a variety of religious perspectives who maintain “a core belief in the dignity of human life” and that gun violence is “an unequivocal violation of that human dignity.”

RCVFRI is also a member of Rhode Island Coalition Against Gun Violence (RICAGV), with a mission to “invite all Rhode Islanders to engage in a serious and reasonable discussion about how to curb gun violence” and call upon “the legislature to enact reasonable, sensible gun control regulations and ask for support for evidence based violence disruption programs.”

Reverend Gene picked the date for his announcement weeks ago, reserving the rotunda for the announcement of his religious coalition long before a date was set to hear testimony on fifteen gun related bills that brought large coalitions on both sides of the issue to the State House. While outside the State House over two hundred people representing groups opposed to sensible actions to curb gun violence rallied supporters through fear and paranoia, under the dome about half that number embraced common sense, optimism and a sense of a historic turn in the dialog on guns in the United States.

Reverend Gene introduced the other speakers during the half hour program, including RICAGV President Jerry Belair, Senator Josh Miller, Representative Linda Finn, the local director of Moms Demand Action, Nan Heroux, Co-chair and co-founder of Newtown Action Alliance Po Murray, and Teny Gross of the Institute for the Study and Practice of Nonviolence. I’ll have more on these speakers in a later post.

Reve Gene at State House


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387