Smith Hill hijinks of high hilarity


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
RI State House (north facade)

With shocking regularity and little sanity, our grand spectator sport-cum-soap opera akin to professional wrestling that is the Rhode Island legislature has continued to pump out hilarious moments that should be making us weep if it were not for the fact this is oh-so-typical. Not since Gibbon profiled the latter days of Rome has a corrupt, bloated, under-financed and over-romanced city-state with delusions of grandeur produced this much copy.

First there was the news that Sen. James Sheehan, in a letter he wrote to Senate President Theresa Paiva Weed that he said was not meant to become public (gee I wonder who leaked it then?), expressed dismay that Speaker Nicholas Mattiello had called any effort to enact ethics reform “an act of war”. Within a few days of that, Mattiello allegedly reshuffled those reps who voted against the controversial RhodeWorks bill out of key committee appointments. Et tu Brute?

Then came the news that Republican Sen. Nicholas Kettle had submitted a bill to require photo identification with purchases using EBT Food Stamps cards. Obviously Kettle, who at age 26 probably feels like everyone else should be carded as he is when he goes to purchase a drink, may be a little wet behind the ears and has no grasp of how being poor works. But the reality is that this bill would be quite problematic not for “the illeegullz” he thinks are committing Food Stamp fraud but the thousands of Rhode Island-based homeless and impoverished who cannot afford to get such a picture ID easily. Getting to the DMV by bus is itself an act of gymnastics, thanks in no small part to the measly budget Kettle’s colleagues gave RIPTA this year, and then obtaining the ID can be time consuming and costly. It bears mentioning that the state merely administers the Food Stamps program that is funded by the federal government, which itself is one of the paltry few elements of a social safety net that is demonstrably the most miserly in the northern hemisphere.

It is likely that most of the Democrats on the Hill will find this bill tasteless even with their standards being what they are and our young Republican will find little to no support for this. As a result, he will have created what amounts to a glamour bill that gives him fifteen minutes of fame on talk radio and actually costs the taxpayers more for us to give this bill a hearing than is actually lost in this alleged Food Stamp fraud. It is worth nothing here that we tried to reach out to Kettle for comment several times by telephone and got no reply but that he was able to be heard the morning of February 16 on WPRO. In other words, the Kettle is calling the pot black.

Finally, the February 16 editorial page of the Providence Journal featured a letter from Jeremiah T. O’Grady where he explained the inner mechanics of the RhodeWorks bill. There are already some grumblings to be heard over the tolls bill due to the recent hirings of middle managers who materialized as quickly as the funding did. What struck me as so interesting, however, was how he framed the piece, using the pension heist that we have been covering here over the last few weeks as a frame of reference.

As I walked into the House chamber last Wednesday to vote on the revised RhodeWorks infrastructure funding bill, I was struck by a sense of déjà vu and transported back to November 2011 when I walked into that same chamber to vote on then-General Treasurer Gina Raimondo’s pension reform proposal. The similarities between the two issues, and the solutions proposed to address them, are striking.

This speaks further to my own theory, that there may be a few more politicians than Gina Raimondo who take a fall when the feds come knocking regarding the letter Ted Siedle sent them last month regarding the various criminal elements involved in the scheme. Would this perhaps be the thing an ethics bill would address, thereby terrifying Speaker Mattiello?

Knowing how the fireworks continue to be launched, all we can say is “stay tuned, sports fans!”

kaGh5_patreon_name_and_message

Moira Walsh to challenge Palangio in House District 3


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Moira Walsh and Malcolm
Moira Walsh and Malcolm

Moira Walsh announced her candidacy for State Representative in House District 3, including the Smith Hill, Charles and Wanskuck neighborhoods in Providence.

“I was born and raised in Smith Hill, and I love our neighborhood,” said Walsh, who in addition to being a longtime waitress in Providence also works as a community organizer with Rhode Island Jobs with Justice. “I’m running for State Representative because our district needs someone who will give everything she’s got, every day, to fight for our community. I know I have the energy, persistence, and passion to follow through on that commitment – because our community deserves it.”

Walsh cited her strong family roots in the district as pivotal in her decision to run for office. “My first job growing up was at The Earthen Vessel, my father Michael’s cornerstone on Smith Hill that offered everything from refrigerators to school uniforms at prices our neighbors could actually afford,” she said. “My mother, Janet, worked for the Diocese of Providence and taught CCD at local parishes for more than two decades. My parents – who still live on Violet Street – always fought tirelessly to support their kids and better their community, and they instilled those same values in me.”

A parent herself, Walsh says her experiences as a single mother gives her the right perspective to represent working families in the district. “As a single mother, I have experienced what so many struggling families in our community deal with on a daily basis,” she said. “I know what it means to choose between paying for gas or for electricity. To decide between buying groceries or getting clothing for my son. I understand what it feels like to work full time, to sign up for all the extra shifts you possibly can, and still fall short at the end of the month. People in our community are working eighty hours a week and spending no time with their families, just to keep their heads above water. It seems that no matter how hard we try, the system is rigged against us, and no one is fighting to preserve the community that has given us all so much. That is why I have worked to advocate for increases in the minimum wage, for protections for workers, and that’s why I’m running.”

Walsh’s candidacy was greeted with excitement across the district. Thomas Oliveira, who have lived in the area for many years, said, “I am so glad Moira is running for state representative. She understands the importance of supporting the community and local businesses, after all, her dad had one that meant a lot to the neighborhood. I know that she has the energy, honesty and commitment to make our neighborhood a better place.”

Janice Luongo, longtime community organizer and Smith Hill resident is also excited. “There is a lot of need in our community,” she said. “And we need someone like Moira who will listen and take action because many families are struggling.  Moira understands struggle, but she also knows how to bring people together to get things done. She has always lived in and loved this district, and I can’t think of anyone better to fight for the issues that matter to us at the State House.”

Walsh lives off of Douglas Avenue in the Wanskuck neighborhood of Providence with her 2 year-old son, Malcolm. She is an alum of Classical High School and Rhode Island College, a longtime server at a local Providence diner, and an organizer with RI Jobs with Justice.

[From a press release]

[Editor’s note: Walsh will be running against Rep Thomas A. Palangio (D) who was elected to 2012 and was re-elected in 2014.]

Has slavery really ended?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

“Churches can be a place where
judgment, shame and contempt
[for families with felons]
are felt most acutely.”
Michelle Alexander

Time for a pop quiz question. Ready? In what year did the U.S. end slavery?

Most agree it’s 1865. Some historians disagree. Their answer: 1942.

True, the Triangle Trade’s enrichment of slave shippers ended with the Civil War. Tragically, however, legally coerced work continued. Some southern states were sly. Police falsely imprisoned blacks, and judges ordered lengthy sentences at hard labor.

“Convict leasing” was legalized. Douglas Blackmon describes this practice as “a system in which armies of free men, guilty of no crimes and entitled by law to freedom, were compelled to labor without compensation, were repeatedly bought and sold, and were forced to do the bidding of white masters through the regular application of extraordinary physical coercion.”

The penal system became the new slavery.

th-43

Still, the answer to our black-history-month query may not be 1942. Ready for a shocker? Enslavement of blacks exists today.

The War on Drugs intensified in the 1980s. In just two decades, those jailed for drug offenses increased ninefold. The Director for National Drug Control Policy, retired General Barry McCaffrey, referred to this imprisonment system as a “drug gulag.”

Mass incarceration is aggressively focused on communities of color. Despite blacks and whites having similar drug usage rates, a 1999 Human Rights Watch report states, “Black men are admitted to state prison on drug charges at a rate that is 13.4 times greater than that of white men.” Indeed, black men imprisoned, on parole and probation now exceed all men enslaved in 1850.

Bondage for drug offenses is inflicted almost exclusively on black and brown men. Whites are usually ‘off the hook.’ Even when arrested, whites are more often given alternatives to jail. When jailed, whites’ average sentences are 16.3 percent shorter than blacks.

Enormous numbers of black bodies are placed in bondage, their prison labor extracted, for non-violent drug offenses. Isn’t this a new system of slavery? Isn’t this massive discrimination also subjecting prisoners’ families—parents, spouses and children—to excruciating emotional and financial bondage?

th-44

As a permanent undercaste, the black community also suffers wage slavery. Whites’ average household income is 68.5 percent higher than blacks—and the black unemployment rate is twice that of whites. This severely depressed income continually increases economic inequality: Average white families now have thirteen times the assets of average black families.

It gets worse: Black prisoners’ sentences continue after release.

Imagine leaving prison. Determined to lead a good life, you plan to go to college—but you’re barred from getting a federal loan. Or you need a job but, if a black man, only five percent of employers will even grant you an interview. You may be desperate for public housing assistance. You can’t get it. By law, you probably can’t receive any public benefits—including food stamps if your kids are hungry. With all these cruel barriers, what choices remain? Can we see why ex-cons often return to prison?

Again, this discrimination primarily decimates blacks.

rejection_zpsa13d9f5c

So who should correct these many forms of racialized financial rape? Why not the white community which perpetrates and often benefits from black bondage?

The first step is education: More fact-packed articles detailing the destructive impacts of racism can be found at www.quoflections.org\race.

Second, share these injustices with friends and family.

Third, let’s seek legislation ending the War on Drugs (really, the War on Black Men). Let’s eradicate laws discriminating against ex-felons. Let’s legalize a living wage. Also, our nation has the wealthiest white community in history, primarily due to centuries of labor stolen or cheated from African Americans. In the name of justice, we who are white can advocate for long-overdue reparations to be invested in neglected black communities.

Oh, and our pop quiz answer: Even in 2016, slavery continues on a massive scale.

Fast tracking RhodeWorks: Passing unpopular legislation in an election year


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

DSC_0914Ahead of yesterday’s finance committee votes in both houses of the General Assembly approving RhodeWorks, the truck toll plan, a press conference was held at the Greater Providence Chamber of Commerce (GPCC) featuring some of Rhode Island’s most powerful political, business and labor leaders. They were there to present a unified message in support of the tolls, despite vocal opposition.

One prominent Rhode Island business owner, whose business has “been a member of the Chamber for almost as long as there’s been a Chamber” told me that contrary to GPCC President Laurie White‘s claims that this issue has been discussed with membership, he was never consulted about the plan, despite his business’s dependence on trucks for shipping. In fact, he said, “I didn’t even hear about this meeting until I heard about it on the radio this morning!”

Gina RaimondoAs I said before, RhodeWorks is inevitable. The legislation has been fast tracked not because there is a sudden, urgent need to fix our roads and bridges; the need for this repair is decades old. The legislation is being fast tracked because the necessary arrangements between the various parties involved have been carefully worked out, but in an election year, meaning that the sooner elected officials put this issue in their rear view mirror the better. Several legislators are going to be challenged for their seats because of their votes on this.

Not that Republican challengers are offering anything better. As Sam Bell pointed out yesterday, the Republican plan seems to be privatization, which means private businesses will take over our roads and bridges and charge whatever tolls they want to for profit, or their plan is cutting the budget, denying important social services to families in need. (Not to worry, though: Senate President Paiva-Weed promises that she and Speaker Mattiello will continue to cut the budget, cut taxes and cut services. More on this in a future article.)

The cost of RhodeWorks will be passed onto consumers. Ocean State Job Lot raised a stink over the weekend when they put their expansion plans on hold, threatening as yet unrealized jobs, but after this all pans out, Job Lot will not lose out on any profits: They will simply raise the price of their goods. This means that we are not imposing a user fee on businesses as much as we are coming up with yet another regressive tax that will affect the poor and middle class more than the rich, which is just the way our political leaders like it.

The General Assembly is expected to pass RhodeWorks today, and Governor Raimondo will sign the legislation asap. In the meantime, you can watch the full press conference below.

Laurie White, Greater Providence Chamber of Commerce (GPCC) President

RI Governor Gina Raimondo

Providence Mayor Jorge Elorza

Peter Andruszkiewicz, Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Rhode Island CEO and President

Scott Wolf, Grow Smart Rhode Island Executive Director

Lloyd Albert, AAA of Southern New England Senior Vice President

Michael F. Sabitoni, Rhode Island Building and Construction Trades Council President

House Speaker Nicholas Mattiello

Senate President Teresa Paiva-Weed

Woonsocket Mayor Lisa Baldelli-Hunt,
Central Falls Mayor James Diossa and
Lt. Governor Dan McKee were in attendance but did not speak.

Patreon

RI political leaders ignore evidence, pursue failed economic policies


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

2-3-16sfp-f1A new report calls into question many of the job growth strategies being pursued and implemented by our state leaders. “To create jobs and build strong economies,” say economists Michael Mazerov and Michael Leachman in their new report, “states should focus on producing more home-grown entrepreneurs and on helping startups and young, fast-growing firms already located in the state to survive and to grow ― not on cutting taxes and trying to lure businesses from other states.”

The report, State Job Creation Strategies Often Off Base takes advantage of new data accumulated over the last fifteen years “about which kinds of firms create jobs” and the data shows that the “vast majority of jobs are created by businesses that start up or are already present in a state — not by the relocation or branching into a state by out-of-state firms.”

The immediate takeaway from this report for Rhode Islanders is that Governor Gina Raimondo’s planned (yet not realized) trip to Davos and the time she spent trying to persuade General Electric (GE) to move to Rhode Island rather than to Massachusetts are wastes of time and money. Raimondo’s offer to GE was in the “same neighborhood” as Massachusett’s $140 million in state and city incentives and grants.  Given the conclusions in this report, Rhode Island dodged a bullet when GE turned Raimondo’s offer down.

I asked the authors of the piece directly about the governor’s plan to travel to the World Economic Summit in Davos and they told me, “That is not where state economic development comes from and that’s really not where policy makers should focus. They should focus on homegrown businesses and try to stimulate startups and helping their businesses that are already in the state to find customers and find the skilled workers they need. Business recruitment accounts for such a tiny share of job creation and that’s really a major point of this paper. It is not where the priority should be placed.”

In other words, we are, as a state, pursuing failed economic and job creation strategies, and we will continue to fail unless we take this new data seriously.

On average, 87 percent of new jobs are created by businesses already in the state. In the chart below, you can see that Rhode Island is no outlier in this department. The remaining 13 percent of jobs come from out of state businesses branching into the state (think of a restaurant chain in Boston adding a store in Providence) or a business actually relocating into the state, as GE recently did when they moved to Massachusetts.

vastmajorityofjobgrowthcomesfrominstatebus-rc_450

What kind of businesses stimulate job creation? The report stresses that “startups and young, fast-growing firms are the fundamental drivers of job creation when the U.S. economy is performing well.”

The report quotes economist John Haltiwanger and his colleagues as saying, “Overall, the evidence shows that most start-ups fail, and most that do survive do not grow. But among the surviving start-ups are high-growth firms that contribute disproportionately to job growth. These high-growth young firms yield the long-lasting contribution of start-ups to net job creation.”

The firms that take off are called “gazelles.” Think Google, Amazon, Tesla or Under Armour, or, in Rhode Island, think NuLabel. These kind of firms accounted for about 15 percent of all businesses, but were responsible for half of gross job creation from 1992-2011.

Failed Policies

In trying to create a “business friendly climate” that will lure small businesses to the state, our leaders, like leaders in many other states, have pursued strategies that are “bound to fail because they ignore the fundamental realities about job creation revealed by the new data and research discussed above.” A favorite failed strategy is tax cuts for “small businesses.”

These tax cuts are not properly aimed at young businesses, they are aimed at small businesses.  Most small businesses don’t have employees or plan to add employees. And targeting tax cuts to young businesses has little effect because most young businesses spend so much money on new equipment, product testing and marketing that they have little in the way of taxable income in the first place.

Tax cuts don’t help a state’s business climate, but they do hurt a government’s ability to do the important work of funding education and maintaining a top notch infrastructure. The report cites an Endeavor Insight study that showed that only 5 percent of entrepreneurs cited low tax rates as a factor in deciding where to locate their company, whereas 31 percent cited access to talent (education) and a city’s quality of life as a factor.

Offering tax breaks and non-tax incentives to lure out-of-state companies to our state is also a losing game. In Rhode Island we are addicted to TSAs, Tax Stabilization Agreements, which allow companies and developers to avoid paying their fair share of taxes and shifts the businesses’ tax burden onto the rest of the city or state taxpayers. As the report clearly shows, “jobs gained due to firm relocation are such trivial factors in a state’s overall job creation record that they should not be a consideration in formulating state tax policy or economic development policy more broadly.”

A look at statements made at the recent Greater Providence Chamber of Commerce luncheon reveals that our elected leaders haven’t gotten this message yet.

Here’s Senate President Teresa Paiva-Weed talking about the importance of tax cuts:

Here’s Senate Majority Leader Dominick Ruggerio talking about tax stabilization agreements to spur development:

Here’s Senate Minority Leader Dennis Algiers on “broad-based” tax cuts, which we’ve seen are not only not effective, they are counter-productive:

Here’s Speaker of the House Nicholas Mattiello talking about how “incentives” (i.e. tax breaks) “attract new people to our state.”

Continuing to pursue strategies that have been shown to hinder rather than help in job creation would be foolish in light of the data in this new report. Instead, “policy needs to focus on encouraging entrepreneurship generally, helping new businesses to survive, and enabling businesses with the potential to become high-growth firms to fulfill that potential.”

Patreon

The RIC/AFT Assembly of Departmental Representatives writes letter over Innovation Officer

The RIC/AFT Assembly of Departmental Representatives write to express our concern over, and objection to, the use of Rhode Island College Foundation funds to hire the State of Rhode Island’s Chief Innovation Officer (CInO). While the Foundation is an independent entity over which faculty members have no direct control, we feel compelled to speak out on this matter in an effort to protect the interests and integrity of the College.

The Providence Journal (1/18/16) reported that RIC’s associate vice president for development and external relations, Edwin Pacheco, indicated that “excitement, not concern, has been the overwhelming campus reaction to the creation of the innovation office.” The basis for such a statement is unclear to us. The faculty was not consulted on this appointment, and it was presented to neither the Council of Rhode Island College nor the RIC-AFT. Most faculty members learned about it after the fact from the newspaper.

Our first concern is the inconsistency of the appointment with the stated mission of the RIC Foundation. The Foundation’s Vision Statement asserts that its “mission is to offer accessible higher education of the finest quality to traditional and non-traditional students from around the state, the region, and beyond.” The Mission Statement asserts that the Foundation is “devoted to raising funds solely for Rhode Island College” (emphasis added). While the presence of the CInO on campus might benefit RIC in some ways, the funds expended for this position can in no way be said to be “solely for Rhode Island College.”

Second, the appointment diverts resources that could have been used to advance the College directly. The CInO’s reported $210,000 salary plus benefits could have been used to hire at least four full-time, tenure-track faculty members. For many years, the FTE cap at RIC has been frozen; the College therefore is forced to rely heavily on contingent employees (adjunct faculty). While the adjuncts are typically excellent instructors, they often teach heavy loads at multiple institutions, do not have formal advising and mentoring roles, and do not participate fully in college governance. They are also poorly paid and do not receive benefits. If the Foundation wants to strengthen
teaching and mentoring at the College, supporting new full-time faculty lines would be far more useful and provide more direct benefits.

Alternatively, this money could have been used to provide scholarships for low-income students. Many RIC students struggle to make ends meet and are forced to work full-time, which makes it difficult for them to carry a full academic load. Such students take longer to complete degrees and they drop out more often. The money used to pay the CInO would have provided full-tuition scholarship for least two-dozen Rhode Island students.

Third, the appointment has unnecessarily placed Rhode Island College in the center of unwanted political controversy. Common Cause Rhode Island has pointed out the serious issues of government transparency that are raised by this appointment. State senators and
representatives have stated their opposition to appointing a member of the governor’s cabinet in this way, and legislation is being prepared to prevent such appointments in the future. The faculty understands well that the college depends on the good will of both the legislature and the governor for our funding. The Foundation Board showed poor judgment by placing the college in the center a conflict between government leaders.

Finally, the use of Foundation funds for purposes other than supporting the College has the potential to harm the College by reducing future contributions to the Foundation. Contributors to the Foundation, a group that includes many faculty members, have a right to see their contributions used in ways consistent with the Foundation’s mission. The misuse of these funds, and the very public controversy over the issue, is likely to dissuade parents, alumni, and faculty members from making contributions in the future. We have seen evidence that this is already occurring.

In sum, we do not believe that the appointment of the RI Chief Innovation Officer through the RIC Foundation is in the best interests of the students or the faculty of Rhode Island College.

kaGh5_patreon_name_and_message

Two protests rock State House during Governor’s budget address


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
2016-02-02 State House 018
Jesus Holguin, EJLRI

As Governor Gina Raimondo presented her budget to the General Assembly and the television viewers at home, she was being simultaneously protested by two groups. The first was a coalition of environmental groups opposed to her support for the expansion of fossil fuel infrastructure in Rhode Island, and the second was made up of undocumented workers and their allies, there to hold the Governor to her promise to make driver’s licenses available to all.

The evening started with members of FANG (Fighting Against Natural Gas), BASE (Burrillville Against Spectra Expansion), Fossil Free Rhode Island and the Environmental Justice League of RI (EJLRI) coming together to protest the Governor’s support for three fracked gas projects in Rhode Island: Invenergy‘s planned fracked gas power plant, the Clear River Energy Center, to be built in Burillville; Spectra Energy‘s planned expansion of pipelines and a compressor station in Burrillville; and National Grid’s planned liquefaction plant at Field’s Point in South Providence.

2016-02-02 State House 024About five minutes before Senate President Teresa Paiva-Weed, as per tradition, lead Governor Raimondo to the House Chambers, English for Action, a group dedicated to improving the lives of immigrants and undocumented workers, entered the State House to stage their own protest. Candidate Raimondo had promised this group that she would issue an executive order, within her first year in office, allowing undocumented workers to get driver’s licenses.

The Governor has broken this campaign promise.

The two groups lost no time in joining forces and ascended the stairs to the second floor chanting and marching. They were kept from approaching the entrance to the House Chambers by Capitol and State Police who formed a line in front of them. The protests were loud, but completely peaceful.

2016-02-02 State House 021
Governor Raimondo

After the Governor entered the House Chambers to deliver her State of the State address, (successfully avoiding any contact with protesters) the two groups briefly separated before joining forces on opposite stairways in the main rotunda. Here they gave a series of short speeches explaining their positions and pledging to support each other’s efforts.

As EJLRI’s Jesus Holguin said to me afterwards, the two issues are actually more related than they might appear. The same forces that drive people from their home countries to seek work in the United States are working to keep the United States addicted to fossil fuels. During his address to the crowd, Nick Katkevich of FANG pointed out that English for Action is one of many groups that has signed onto FANG’s letter opposing the power plant.

The two groups pledged to support each other’s issues and future actions.

One thing that became abundantly clear is that the number of people who are willing to protest the Governor (and, as we saw yesterday, Senator Sheldon Whitehouse) is growing. Katkevich asked those present to join with FANG “everywhere the Governor goes” to call Raimondo out on her support for the power plant.

2016-02-02 State House 001

2016-02-02 State House 002

2016-02-02 State House 003

2016-02-02 State House 004

2016-02-02 State House 005

2016-02-02 State House 006

2016-02-02 State House 007

2016-02-02 State House 008

2016-02-02 State House 009

2016-02-02 State House 010

2016-02-02 State House 011

2016-02-02 State House 012

2016-02-02 State House 013

2016-02-02 State House 014

2016-02-02 State House 015

2016-02-02 State House 016

2016-02-02 State House 017

2016-02-02 State House 019

2016-02-02 State House 020

2016-02-02 State House 022

2016-02-02 State House 023

2016-02-02 State House 025

2016-02-02 State House 026

2016-02-02 State House 027

2016-02-02 State House 028

2016-02-02 State House 029

2016-02-02 State House 030

2016-02-02 State House 031

2016-02-02 State House 032

2016-02-02 State House 033

Patreon

RI Progressive Democrats endorse David Norton in House District 60


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

RIPDA logoThe Rhode Island Progressive Democrats voted to endorse David Norton in the race for State Representative, Pawtucket District 60, at our January meeting. David has long been a hardworking, dedicated member of the progressive movement, and we are excited that he is running for this seat.

David Norton has a strong track record of success. He created the ‘Organizing for Pawtucket’ group which launched the “Keep the PawSox in Pawtucket” campaign – a feat that no one thought could be won. It was David’s leadership, talent, and passionate dedication that ultimately led to the demise of the proposal that taxpayers fund a new stadium in Providence! This campaign confronted the powerful conservative political machine that runs the Rhode Island Democratic Party—and won.

David is a true Democrat. He is fighting for working families and is committed to the Democratic party’s basic priorities like ethics reform, a woman’s right to choose, common sense gun safety regulation, and repealing the tax cuts for the rich—priorities that many Rhode Island legislators, both Democrats and Republicans, sadly oppose.

Norton has already been raising important issues. He has called out the General Assembly’s shameful move to raise car taxes on the middle class to help pay for enormous tax cuts for the rich. He is pushing for a fair tax structure that will provide relief to the middle class by asking big corporations and the wealthy to simply pay their fair share.

Norton is also highlighting the culture of backroom corporate welfare deals. He is committed to fighting for real reform, including the roll back of the massive expansion of the agency, Commerce RI, that is largely responsible for the failed 38 Studios venture.

Most importantly, David is willing to stand up to the State House leadership to fight for what is right. He has already proven that he can be effective, and we know he will be a powerful leader in the fight to bring Democratic values back to the state Democratic Party, the General Assembly, Pawtucket, and Rhode Island.

It takes courage and conviction to stand up to the establishment, and we couldn’t be prouder to stand with David Norton. We are sending him the maximum allowable campaign contribution under state law ($1000), and our members are eager to hit the ground in Pawtucket and knock on doors, make phone calls, and do what we can to help David win the primary in September.

[From a press release]

David Norton

ACLU report finds numerous violations of Open Meetings Act


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

acluPublic meeting agendas in Rhode Island are “often vague, lacking critical information, and at times entirely unhelpful” to residents attempting to participate in their government, a new report by the American Civil Liberties Union of Rhode Island has found. In reviewing just one week of public meeting agendas, the ACLU of RI discovered numerous violations of a critical portion of the state’s Open Meetings Act (OMA), and recommended that the law be strengthened in order to adequately protect the public’s right to know.

Today’s report, “Hidden Agendas,” focuses on the Open Meetings Act’s requirement that state and local agencies clearly specify in their agendas what is to be discussed at meetings, and that they post the agendas at least 48 hours before the meeting date. The ACLU review of the agendas for every public meeting held during the week of October 5, 2015, found that many of them failed to offer meaningful explanations about the items to be discussed. In addition, the statute’s 48-hour notice requirement was undermined by public bodies’ use of weekends to comply with that timeframe, and served to discourage individuals, and particularly individuals in need of accommodations, from attending meetings.

“The net result of these practices is to make it much harder for members of the public to know exactly what public bodies plan to discuss at their meetings and, therefore, for the public to fully participate in the meetings or to contact members of the public body in advance to express views about items that may be discussed or voted upon,” the report stated.

The ACLU found that many agendas improperly listed only generic categories such as “Old Business” or “Reports” with no further explanation. The agenda for a Burrillville Planning Board Meeting, for example, included the item “Planning Board Discussion,” while a review of the meeting’s minutes shows the discussion included questions about the controversial proposed power plant in the town. In another instance, the Northern Rhode Island Conservation District posted an agenda consisting largely of acronyms such as “SCC,” “NRCS,” and “RIFCO” that hold little meaning to the general public. Meanwhile, an agenda for the Pawtucket Board of Appeals consisted only of one sentence and did not include the place or time of the meeting.

The state’s fire districts, many of which have histories of open government violations, also violated OMA’s agenda notice requirement in blatant ways. In just one of the examples highlighted in the report, the Hopkins Hill Fire District Executive Board posted an agenda that stated “New Business: None,” but meeting minutes show a number of votes were taken during “New Business,” including one authorizing the expenditure of $25,000.

The ACLU also found that public bodies frequently undermined the intent behind the 48- hour posting requirement by using the weekend to meet the timeframe, giving the public very little time to learn the contents of upcoming meetings. Of the 74 agendas posted for Monday, October 5th meetings, 25 of them – including those for nine Town Council meetings – were not posted until the Friday before. For example, the Monday agenda for a Jamestown Town Council meeting was formally posted at 4:54 PM on the Friday before.

The report further noted that by posting agendas insufficiently in advance, public bodies prevent or discourage attendance from individuals who, because of hearing impairments or other disabilities, are in need of reasonable accommodations at public meetings. In several instances, agendas posted just two days before a meeting required an individual needing communications assistance to contact the agency three days in advance.

“The importance of providing adequate advance notice to the public about a meeting, and the topics that will be covered, is too obvious to need to explain. In many instances, however, public bodies did what they could to minimize the impact of advance notice,” the report stated.

The ACLU of Rhode Island called for extensive amendments to the Open Meetings Act, which has not been comprehensively reviewed in nearly 20 years, in order to address these serious problems. Among the ACLU’s recommendations:

  • The public should be given more than 48 hours notice about public meetings, and weekends and holidays should be excluded from the calculation. The timeframe for posting of agendas must also provide sufficient time for members of the public needing accommodations to request them.
  • All public bodies should be required to post meeting minutes and audio-recordings of their meetings on the Secretary of State’s website. These steps will serve as an important check on violations of the agenda notification requirement and will promote greater transparency.
  • The inclusion of common open-ended agenda items such as “Old Business,” “New Business,” and “Reports” without further explication should be prohibited.
  • Every public body should be required to designate a person with responsibility for complying with the agenda notice provisions of OMA, and for certifying their knowledge of OMA’s requirements.

A copy of the report is available here: http://riaclu.org/images/uploads/OMA_report_Feb_2016_Final.pdf

St. Buddy Cianci


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

the_sacred_heart_of_buddyThere’s an old story about the economist John Maynard Keynes who went to Washington, D.C. and met Franklin Roosevelt. After a few minutes of trying to explain his theories with no luck to an oblivious President, he walked away in disgust and despair, realizing that the most powerful man in American government had no idea what he was doing and instead was merely responding to massive protest movements for things like Social Security, jobs programs, and labor union rights by giving the people what they wanted, macroeconomics be damned. This of course helps us better understand why the “Roosevelt Recession” of 1937 happened, the man was just following the tides and ended up causing a near-disaster by cutting the spending in programs that defined the Keynesian New Deal.

That historical insight is vital to grasp when one begins a discussion of Mayor Vincent “Buddy” Cianci, the longest-serving Mayor of Providence who has just passed away. For the rest of the world, big deal, who cares? But in Rhode Island, this is earth-shattering. I have not seen such an outpouring since the death of Princess Diana. Everyone on Facebook and in the local blog-o-sphere has a Buddy story. Edward Achorn, the ultra-reactionary head editor of the Providence Journal was especially gleeful, but then again Achorn has this habit of showing off his insecurities in odd ways.

Image 1

The first thing to understand about Cianci is that for the better part of four decades, he was not just part of the news cycle, he was the news cycle in this half-demented, perennially-corrupt backwater imitation of a late Roman Imperial city-state that I call home. The man would go to the opening of an envelope if it got him good press. He popped off memorable one-liners with such ease I would not be surprised if someone puts out a little red book of Quotations According to Mayor Buddy (my personal favorite: “Be careful of the toe that you step on today because it may be connected to an ass that you have to kiss tomorrow.”) There are probably a few die-hard blue hairs up on Federal Hill as I write this lighting candles and praying novenas in Italian for the repose of his immortal soul.

This funeral is going to be a complete and utter shit-show, featuring a whose-who of politicians, judges, municipal employees, and everyone who ever “got a favor” from Buddy. I imagine the Cathedral of Sts. Peter and Paul is going to have everything but the angel Gabriel and his host of seraphim lifting the casket to heaven while Pavarotti belts out Ave Maria and fifteen professional Sicilian mourners drop dead in the aisle from grief.

But aside from trying to guess how a man that my dear mentor Bruce “Rudy Cheeks” McCrae called “Bud-I” is going to exit in one final bout of glory, there is something deeper at play. I would submit that Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan may have been the movers and shakers of neoliberalism but that the first politician to test-run the neoliberal ideology on a municipal level was Cianci. A fine book, The Prince of Providence by Mike Stanton, probably the best on corruption since Robert Penn Warren, can be examined for corroboration.

There are a few markers that can point in this direction. One of Buddy’s premiere moments was during the Republican National Convention that nominated Gerald Ford to run against Jimmy Carter. Cianci, then thriving on the cred generated by his days as a mob prosecutor and running as a reform-minded Republican in a historically-blue state, took the podium. Carter had just made a public gaffe and called Cianci’s brethren “Eye-talians” on television. Buddy said with much aplomb at a time when Coppola’s GODFATHER films were stirring up ethnic pride “Mistah Cottah, we ahh not Eye-talian, we are Italo-Americans!” This was a preliminary stab at what we would now call neoliberal identity politics, the assertion by the power structure of the liberationist vocabulary to justify white hegemony. Perhaps some decades earlier there had been lynching of Italians. But by the time Buddy hit the scene, Italians, Irish, and Portuguese were white conservatives who found themselves oftentimes on the other sides of the protest lines from their weirdo hippie kids that liked hanging out with moulignons (the Italian word for eggplant often used in the Ocean State as a slur against people of color), feminists, queers, and other undesirables in the newly-developing post-Woodstock Culture Wars. You cannot call it “white pride”, but when you call it “Italian pride”, it sure seems acceptable even if it is closer to Mussolini than Sacco and Vanzetti. It is worth mentioning that this ethnic pride informed his decision to make every Italian in sight a cop, laying the seeds for the fracas that occurred last fall when Providence Police had a public fit over the words #BlackLivesMatter being written on a beverage container. The force has always, since Buddy’s days, been a majority-white one.

Another point was his support of the LGBTQQI community and the arts. Buddy oversaw a Renaissance in the 1980’s and 1990’s that made the city a haven for orientation difference and the lively arts scene that exists in parallel with we fabulous folk. But there is a dark side to this also, the gentrification aspect. With a good deal of help from the wonderful souls at Brown University and Rhode Island School of Design, the historic black neighborhood on the East Side has been almost totally ethnically cleansed, a process now at work in the black neighborhoods on the West End and in the Olneyville area. Scholarship exists that shows how, if queer populations are not mindful of their impact, they can end up being foot-soldiers for gentrification. Class war can be so classy like that.

Another point was his anti-labor stances. He was infamous for his standoffs with unions, hiring scabs and making quips to the people he was screwing. Michael Riley, a sometimes-candidate with a Tea Party bent that has a knack for finance has been circulating a PowerPoint for some time now that some municipal employees think has an air of truth to it. Riley argues that Providence is effectively bankrupt and has been “borrowing” money from the municipal pension fund to cover operational costs. This is a structural problem that dates back decades and could end up leading back to a Cianci administration. Obviously part of this is to be attributed to old-fashion corruption that we have always taken as business as usual. But another element has to do with a fundamental lack of respect for municipal employees. Buddy would get you the job to get him your vote but he certainly was not going to be taking out a subscription to the Daily Worker. It bears mentioning that he helped make Providence one of the first host cities for the neoliberal City Year program.

Finally, consider the fact that there were really three parties in Providence, the Republicans, the Democrats, and Buddy. He quickly was able to shed partisan affiliation and become an independent. But I would argue he was not political, at least not in the sense one uses to describe a Tory or a Socialist. Instead, he was post-partisan, an apolitical chameleon who could operate like the biggest cog in a Democratic machine at one moment and an austerity-minded Republican in the next. This is because the political class had come to a “consensus” that accepted neoliberalism’s coordinates and defined electoral races around Culture War issues instead of class war. It is no accident that he was able to yuck it up with the Clintons when they graced us with their presence.

But between this and his multiple PR fiascoes, including his interview with the New York Times Magazine when he said of his administration “no one ever urinated on anybody”, the operative question is why are people going nuts for this guy?

The answer is quite simple. Just like FDR, he made us feel good about ourselves. After an earth-shattering financial crash in 1929, Americans were doubting that America was worth anything anymore, hence the heydays of the various Leftist movements. FDR came into office and knew how to make people feel proud to be Americans again. He did not need to know how Keynesian economics worked, just how to make people smile. Buddy made us proud to be Rhode Islanders. He made us talk about Providence as a city you go to for cultural events as opposed to a rest stop on the way from New York to Boston or Cape Cod. He brought the most extravagant spectacles to town, re-designed the entire waterfront, built up the arts scene, and made the people brag about things they went to on the weekend. Was he corrupt, venal, vain, a political showboat to make the Metropolitan Opera look like a Quaker sing-a-long? Did he get convicted on two separate occasions for felonies? Did he beat his ex-wife’s alleged paramour with a fireplace log and ash tray while the police looked on? Yes, yes, and yes (the movie version of this final event is a key insight to the Cianci phenomenon).

But in the mainstream, who cares? Is FDR remembered for ignoring the plight of European Jews, vetoing anti-lynching legislation, and interning Japanese Americans? No, in the mainstream he is the Cheshire cat grinning ear to ear as he rescues us from calamity, the messiah of liberalism who dies trying to save his country. And as such it shall be with Buddy as the messiah of neoliberalism. The fact he made one final shot at office last election when he was obviously dying of cancer further cements the Roosevelt parallel.

Before there was Obama, there was Buddy. I will not miss the seamier side of his persona. I will also probably continue to pay for his fiscal foul-ups via my taxes for years to come and see the repercussions of his labor policies negatively impact people I care about for even longer. But like Ernest Thayer understood when he wrote Casey At The Bat, there is something to be said for the self-assured superstar, even if he causes a mess in the end. If I were to write his case for sainthood in the Catholic Church, I would try to get him made the patron saint of patronage.

kaGh5_patreon_name_and_message

Mass incarceration creates a permanent underclass


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Black man being arrested

“The country’s poverty rate would
have been more than 20 percent
lower between 1980 and 2004
without mass incarceration.”
Villanova University study

Like most U.S. adults, I have violated the nation’s drug laws.

The year was 1971. A freshman at the University of Michigan’s Dearborn campus, I began smoking marijuana with two of my three roommates. As police did not arrest drug offenders on campus, I never worried about being jailed.

Not so for Clifford Runoalds, an African American who was arrested for failure to cooperate with prosecutors. They wanted him to testify against a defendant in the infamous Hearne, Texas “drug bust” of 2000. A rogue police task force arrested 28 residents on the word of only one informant, on drugs, who lied about his African-American neighbors.

Runoalds was innocent. The drug deals never happened. Still, he was jailed for a month before prosecutors released him. As Michelle Alexander explains in her extraordinary book, The New Jim Crow, Runoalds was technically free—but his life was decimated. Jail time resulted in the loss of his job, his car, his apartment and his furniture.

Moreover, Runoalds was grieving the death of his eighteen-month-old daughter. Handcuffed at her funeral, which was about to begin, police rejected his pleas to say goodbye to his daughter.

Black man being arrested

Runoalds is not alone. Systemic discrimination begins with traffic stops. National data indicates blacks and Latinos are three times more likely to be searched than whites. Pedestrian stop-and-frisk is far worse. The New York Police Department frisked 545,000 people in 2008: 85 percent were black; eight percent were white.

Prosecutors and judges amplify this discrimination. According to Human Rights Watch, at least fifteen states sentenced black drug offenders at 20 to 57 times the rate of white drug offenders. In addition, the U.S. Sentencing Commission documented that, from 2007 to 2011, blacks received sentences 19.5 percent longer than whites.

Pic of black prisoners

The Bureau of Justice Statistics projected that one in three black males born in 2001 would be sent to prison during their lifetimes; for Latinos, one in six; for whites, one in seventeen.

The War on Drugs is an excuse for mass incarceration of black and brown people. SWAT teams do not descend on college campuses. Police do not target the homes of white suburbanites. No, they target poor minority neighborhoods. But as Alexander’s extensive documentation indicates, “The notion that most illegal drug use and sales happens in the ghetto is pure fiction.”

SWAT team

Poor minorities are swept up into the criminal justice system in numbers whites will never face. Those arrested are often unable to pay bail. So they languish in a cage. Faced with many months or perhaps years in jail awaiting trial, even innocent people accept unjust plea bargains. Many serve long sentences on probation—just one misstep from prison.

In addition to 2.3 million incarcerated, more than 7 million people are currently on probation or parole, many for drug or other nonviolent offenses. The fact that minorities are vastly overrepresented in this system means, as Alexander emphasizes, they constitute a new caste, a permanent underclass.

Under Jim Crow, separate but “equal” treatment was legal. This systemic racism supposedly ended in 1954 with the Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka decision. A new Jim Crow has arisen, however, with discriminatory effects even more powerful than the blatant racism of an earlier era.

Challenges to the system’s racism is now barred by court decisions. Alexander concludes, “The legal rules adopted by the Supreme Court guarantee that those who find themselves locked up and permanently locked out due to the drug war are overwhelmingly black and brown.”

Like many young white men, I smoked marijuana. Unlike massive numbers of young black men, few of us with white skin lost our freedom and our families. We did not lose our jobs, our apartments, our cars. Nor should we—but neither should drug users of color.

Help get Bernie Sanders on the ballot tomorrow night at Ogie’s


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

white-button-aug2015_1024x1024Those interested in helping to get Bernie Sanders on the presidential ballot here in Rhode Island should consider heading out to Ogie’s Trailer Park tomorrow night. The campaign will be handing out nomination papers for people to canvass in their own area to get signatures.  Signatures can be from any registered Rhode island voter.  To get Sanders on the ballot here in Rhode Island the campaign needs 3000-5000 signatures in two weeks. Nomination papers have to be returned by February 4 and 1000 validated signatures are needed.

Kevin Keefe, of Bernie’s Ballot Brigade, will provide a national perspective of the campaign as the primary season rapidly approaches.

This will be a chance meet fellow supporters from across the state and talk politics. There will be some free appetizers, but the campaign will also be soliciting donations and signing people up for the campaign.

The event is free but there is an official signup form available here.



Other Bernie Sanders events:

Bernie Sanders’ Livestream

Saturday, January 23 – Cumberland Public Safety Union Hall –  5:00pm – 8:00pm- 7 Cray Street Cumberland
Live Streaming a message from Bernie updating people on his campaign

Rhode Island Rocks for Bernie

Sunday, January 31  –  Ocean Mist – 4:00pm – 10:00pm – 895 Matunuck Beach Rd, Matunuck

Join South County for Bernie for this great fundraiser. Bernie’s Ballot Brigade organizer Kevin Keefe will be giving an update on the campaign and there will be great music from The Copacetics, The Jungle Dogs and the Silks. This is an all ages show. Suggested donation is $15.00.

Operation Clean Government calls for independent investigation of 38 Studios


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Screen Shot 2016-01-17 at 9.39.59 PMRecent testimony by Steven Costantino before the House Oversight Committee was a long-overdue step in the right direction.

While newsworthy, the appearance by the former House Finance Chair falls seriously short of the full investigation that clean-government groups have been demanding.

Margaret Kane, president of Operation Clean Government (OCG), said, “State House leaders want to move past 38 Studios, but they want to do so by sweeping it under the rug. The public deserves to know how this disaster occurred, and without an independent investigation it is unlikely that Rhode Islanders will ever learn the truth.”

OCG is also concerned that little effort has apparently gone into preventing similar disasters from happening in the future. “Even Mr. Constantino testified that he was generally opposed to moral obligation bonds,” Kane points out.

She added that Treasurer [Seth] Magaziner’s plan to strengthen a finance board which he largely appoints isn’t exactly the independent oversight that is needed.

Operation Clean Government is a member of the Investigate38StudiosNow.org coalition, which has been calling for the 38 Studios scandal to be investigated not only by the legislative oversight committees, but also by an independent investigator hired outside the legislative branch. Since the coalition called for these investigations, the Oversight Committee has for the first time been allowed to issue 38 Studios subpoenas. However, Governor [Gina] Raimondo has still refused to appoint a truly independent investigator.

The 38 Studios scandal, which has already cost the state many millions of dollars, shows no sign of going away.

[From a press release]


You watch the full testimony in the videos below:

Wingmen talk Trump and Sanders


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Wingmen LogoRI Future’s Bob Plain was on Wingmen discussing the Presidential race with John Brien and Bill Rappleye.

Plain says Donald Trump sounds like a fourth grader and that if everyone who likes Bernie Sanders‘ message but won’t vote for him because “he can’t win” just voted for Sanders, then Sanders would win, and by a “landslide” in the primary and the general.

John Brien feels that Trump suffers from a lack of nuance and that as a free market supporter he just can’t get past the socialist label and support Sanders.

Nobody talked about Hilary Clinton all that much.

General Assembly highs and lows


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

SONY DSCThe first week of the 2016 legislative session of the RI General Assembly was filled with high aspirations and low comedy. Here are some of the “Highs and Lows.” From passing the Good Samaritan Act to the fawning flattery of courtiers, we ran the gamut this week. Plus, a frying pan to the head for a prominent Trump supporter.

The high point came from the Senate, where on the second day in session, they passed the Good Samaritan Act, nearly unanimously. Only Senator Frank A. Ciccone, III (D District 7, Providence, North Providence) voted against. Attending the session was former East Side Senator Rhoda Perry, whose son, Alexander, recently passed away after a long battle with addiction. Perry was instrumental in passing the Good Samaritan Act when she was a Senator, and it is fitting that she should be in attendance. Senator Gayle L. Goldin (D District 3, Providence) fittingly submitted a resolution honoring Alexander Perry.

The low point was in the House of Representatives, where Rep. Joseph M. McNamara (D District 19 Warwick, Cranston) competed with House Majority Leader John J. DeSimone (D District 5 Providence) in obsequiously slathering House Speaker Nicholas A. Mattiello with oleaginous praise over his being awarded “Man of the Year” by GoLocalProv. The House rose to give Speaker Mattiello a standing ovation as we all grabbed our air sickness bags.

The opening minutes of the House of Reps this year were marked by Speaker Mattiello studiously ignoring the protesters demanding Licenses for All outside the House chamber. As Mattiello calls for order, the voice of community organizer  Juan Garcia can be heard shouting the Speaker’s name over and over again. Mattiello said recently that he is unmoved by protests, and he seems intent on proving that.

The ever classy ProJo‘s reaction to this event was to publish a letter from the kind-hearted James P Hosey in which he says, “Were I governor, I would have called out the National Guard to deal with these hooligans.”

The best moment in unintentional meta-comedy came from Rep. Joseph A. Trillo (R District 24 Warwick). Trillo, who has just been named honorary chairman of the RI Trump for President campaign, introduced his wife, Marilyn Cocozza Trillo, and said that she’s his “key political adviser.” Trillo made a joke that his wife sometimes uses a “frying pan to hit me in the head to get the advice through,” leaving us all to wonder whether it’s her bad advice or concussive brain damage that’s brought Trillo to publicly espouse his support for the racist, fascist and deceptive Donald Trump.

And lastly, I’d be remiss if I didn’t point out that the General Assembly engaged in two minutes, 48 seconds of public, legislative prayer. The prayers were all Christian in nature and mostly Catholic. The prayers are in no way reflective of our state’s diversity and are in no way respectful of our state’s history of separation of church and state or freedom of conscience.

Roger Williams would not approve.

Patreon

Senate passes Good Samaritan Act, House takes it up on Tuesday


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Good Samaritan 173“We applaud, and are deeply grateful to, the Senate for its quick action today in making the reinstatement of the [Good Samaritan Overdose Prevention Act of 2016] the legislative priority of the first week,” said Steve DeToy of the Rhode Island Medical Society, Rebecca McGoldrick of Protect Families First and Steven Brown of the ACLU of Rhode Island in a joint statement.

“Reinstating this law will save lives, and is an essential step in addressing the dire overdose epidemic Rhode Island is grappling with. Furthermore, it is a step in the right direction of how we should address drug use and addiction. For too long we have made it the task of the criminal justice system to address these issues, and this approach has been costly, ineffective, and destructive. It’s time that we handle drug use and addiction as a public health and medical issue and put saving lives above making arrests. The Good Samaritan bill makes major strides towards that goal by giving people in the community greater confidence that they will not be arrested if they seek medical care.

“In that regard, we are hopeful that in considering this legislation next week, the House will not only pass it speedily but will also consider expanding it to cover other drug-related offenses as well.”

The bill was introduced by Sen. Michael J. McCaffrey (D-Dist. 29, Warwick).”Identical legislation (2016-H 7003) submitted by Rep. Robert E. Craven (D-Dist. 32, North Kingstown) will be taken up by the House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday at the rise of the House in Room 101 says a General Assembly press release. The bill exempts “from liability any person who administers an opioid antagonist to another person to prevent a drug overdose. It would further provide immunity from certain drug charges and for related violations of probation and/or parole for those persons who in good faith, seek medical assistance for a person experiencing a drug overdose.”

Governor Gina Raimondo is expected to sign the bill and also issued a statement. “The Good Samaritan Overdose Prevention Act of 2016 is an important tool to combat this public health crisis. Rhode Island’s response to the overdose crisis must first and foremost be focused on saving lives. I applaud the General Assembly for their action to encourage Rhode Islanders to call 911 in an overdose emergency.”

When Speaker Nicholas Mattiello abruptly ended the legislative session last year the Good Samaritan law was one of the most important and vital pieces of legislation not to pass. The original bill had a sunset clause, but has been so successful in saving lives its reinstatement was considered a given. Activists were shocked, lives were put at risk.

Mattiello considered having a special Fall legislative session to discuss the PawSox deal, truck tolls and the Good Samaritan Act, but that Fall session never came to pass.

Patreon

Mayor Elorza offering tax breaks Candidate Elorza opposed


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Elorza 002As a candidate, Jorge Elorza promised that tax deals would not be given out unless Providence could profit from the deal in some way. Mayor Elorza, however, seems intent on perpetuating the kinds of bad practices that lead inevitably to higher tax rates for home owners.

When the RI Progressive Democrats of America (RIPDA) were in the process of interviewing candidates for Mayor of Providence in search of the group’s endorsement, they took the liberty of recording the interviews. One of the questions that the group posed to then candidate Elorza was about Tax Stabilization Agreements (TSAs) which are essentially massive tax breaks given by the city to what it considers to be worthy investments. The idea behind TSAs is that a company might want to build in Providence, and in order to lure the company here, a tax break is given. This might spur building and development, and if used properly, is arguably a good idea.

However, in practice, these tax breaks are not doled out in ways that might spur growth or development, but are given out to developers who have back room connections to City Hall. It’s cronyism at its worst, and it costs Providence home owners directly, as their taxes are raised to cover the breaks given to insiders.

According to the Progressive Democrats, “The deals pending before the city right now are even more egregious than usual. That’s because the development has already happened. There’s no question of encouraging development–the developers want their special tax deals to continue. This is just giving the city’s limited tax dollars to big developers.  Pure and simple.”

Sam Bell, executive director of the RIPDA, said, “One of the things that really inspired us about Elorza when he was running was his commitment to crack down on the abusive culture of corporate welfare.  It’s very sad to see him change his tune now that he’s won.”

You can watch Elorza answer the question about TSAs below.

See more here: Details on Elorza’s tax breaks for existing properties

Patreon

Steve Ahlquist on Bernie TV discussing the Worcester rally


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Ahlquist BernieTVBernie TV had Steve Ahlquist on to discuss some video he took of Bernie Sanders arriving at his rally in Worcester, Mass. Sanders can be seen shaking hands and greeting his way through and the line of people waiting to get in for over six minutes, solidifying his reputation as a man of the people.

The appearance lasts about four minutes. Steve talks about his impressions of the rally and his impressions of Sanders as well.

You can see Steve’s appearance in the video below:

https://youtu.be/BjDTfCs6H9M?t=12m53s

You can read Steve’s original coverage of the event and watch the unedited video here.

Bernie Sanders brings his political revolution to Worcester


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

2016-01-02 Bernie Sanders 260Bernie Sanders spoke to an overflow crowd of hundreds in Worcester, Massachusetts Saturday afternoon. The crowd was enthusiastic, and rocked the gymnasium of North High School with thunderous applause. Sanders delivered a populist message, telling the crowd that in his  “political revolution” will not “allow Donald Trump and these other people to” divide working people. There will be no more living in fear and desperation.

Contrary to what people are saying, Sanders says he’s not a “fringe candidate.” The campaign, says Sanders, is “in striking distance of winning Iowa… ahead in New Hampshire” and “we’re going to win in Massachusetts.

The people I traveled with, all Sanders supporters from Rhode Island, were impressed with the speech. There were some small caveats: he doesn’t address foreign policy much and his timeline on a $15 minimum wage seems unnecessarily long. But the dynamism of Sanders’ message and his ability to bring a populist message in support of working families and against the “billionaire class” clearly resonates.

No cuts to Medicaid. Ending “grotesque” levels of income and wealth inequality. Ending corporate welfare and overturning Citizens United. Investing in infrastructure and education. “If a bank is too big to fail, it is too big to exist.” Black Lives Matter. Expand funding for Planned Parenthood. Raise the minimum wage. Climate Change is real. Single payer health care.

As Sanders said, “It’s for us to determine what the issues are, not some billionaire corporation.”

And the man knows how to make an entrance. As the crowd waited in line outside in the cold, Sanders walked up the line, warmly greeting supporters with hugs, handshakes and kind words. His attention was on the people, not the media. You can watch it here:

2016-01-02 Bernie Sanders 031

2016-01-02 Bernie Sanders 037

2016-01-02 Bernie Sanders 053

2016-01-02 Bernie Sanders 057

2016-01-02 Bernie Sanders 065

2016-01-02 Bernie Sanders 073

2016-01-02 Bernie Sanders 074

2016-01-02 Bernie Sanders 085

2016-01-02 Bernie Sanders 094

2016-01-02 Bernie Sanders 095

2016-01-02 Bernie Sanders 098

2016-01-02 Bernie Sanders 121

2016-01-02 Bernie Sanders 127

2016-01-02 Bernie Sanders 130

2016-01-02 Bernie Sanders 194

2016-01-02 Bernie Sanders 207

2016-01-02 Bernie Sanders 208

2016-01-02 Bernie Sanders 225

2016-01-02 Bernie Sanders 246

2016-01-02 Bernie Sanders 253

2016-01-02 Bernie Sanders 260

2016-01-02 Bernie Sanders 269

2016-01-02 Bernie Sanders 278

2016-01-02 Bernie Sanders 282

2016-01-02 Bernie Sanders 286

2016-01-02 Bernie Sanders 294

2016-01-02 Bernie Sanders 302

2016-01-02 Bernie Sanders 306

2016-01-02 Bernie Sanders 309

2016-01-02 Bernie Sanders 324

2016-01-02 Bernie Sanders 334

2016-01-02 Bernie Sanders 364

2016-01-02 Bernie Sanders 370

Patreon

Debbie Wasserman Schultz is impeding democracy


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Debbie Wasserman Schultz
Debbie Wasserman-Schultz

This country has a problem, and it’s a big one. Our democracy is being corrupted by those who are supposed to champion it. Sadly, it is a problem that has been exacerbated by the chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz. And it is killing the party.

This year’s presidential primary campaign is case in point. The debates are meant to showcase the Democratic candidates, and the Democratic Party. Wasserman-Schultz’s obvious allegiance to front runner Hillary Clinton is preventing the American people from getting an opportunity to really hear all of the candidates.

To put it bluntly, the debate schedule is a complete farce. Never have there been debates scheduled at such inappropriate times. Democrats should want to showcase our candidates. The contrast with the Republicans are stunning. Why would the chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee not want people to see these debates? The only reason that Wasserman-Schultz could possibly have for doing this is to prevent candidates Bernie Sanders and Martin O’Malley from having a truly national forum to promote their issues, viewpoints, and differences with the other candidate.

The proof is in the numbers. The Republican debates, which have been shown in the middle of the week, have averaged 18.3 million viewers, while the three Democratic Debates have averaged just 10.7 million viewers. Even Tulsi Gabbard (D., Hawaii), a vice chairwoman of the DNC questioned Wasserman-Schultz about the lack of debates and was subsequently disinvited to attend the second debate. If the goal of Wasserman-Schultz is to prevent the American people from learning about the candidates, then she is doing a bang up job!

Along with the debate times, there is the threat that Wasserman-Schultz has placed on the candidates who participate in more debates not sanctioned by the DNC. If they take part in any other debates, they will be banned from participating in future Democratic debates. This of course hurts the campaigns of Sanders and O’Malley the most. This is not how a democracy should work.

And then there is the drama of the “untimely accidental breach” by the DNC’s campaign data management company NGP VAN. Instead of doing the right thing, Wasserman-Schultz again attempted to circumvent democracy. The contract, which is signed by the candidates and the DNC, allows the candidate accused of breaching voter information 10 days to investigate, report, and resolve any issues. Bernie Sanders and his campaign were more than willing to abide by that, and they emailed the DNC with their intent to perform a full investigation. But instead of working with Sanders, Wasserman-Schultz went nuclear. She shut off the Sanders campaign’s access to the most fundamental tool of any campaign–the voter file. Think about that for a second. She prevented the Sanders campaign from accessing their own data, data they paid for. Because this was illegal, the Sanders campaign had no choice but to sue. Soon after the lawsuit was filed, the DNC caved and restored the voter file.

In the latest news, the DNC and DWS has awarded Kroll Industries, which is owned by Altegrity, which is owned by our very own Providence Equity Firm, which was bought for over a billion dollars back in June 2010, the honor of doing the “independent” investigation. [Note: Providence Equity Partners no longer owns Altegrity or Altegrity’s subsidiary Kroll, because Altegrity went bankrupt this year. The new name for Altegrity is Corporate Risk Holdings, and it still owns Kroll but is now independent from Providence Equity Partners. See here and here.] Kroll’s history is one of dubious distinction. They have been described as a sort of “private CIA for the Powerful” and they have Goldman Sachs and Chevron  written all over them. With a history of falsifying data and illegal wiretapping, Kroll’s is exactly the agency who should not be doing the investigation, hardly independent.  There are also direct ties to the  Democratic National Committee. The former Deputy Finance Chair for the DNC, Betsy Blumenthal, is now the Senior Managing Director for Kroll Industries.  This in itself may be a conflict of interest.

Additional information can be found with the below links.

This whole debacle undermines the Democratic Party. People are sick and tired of the antics of the Chairwoman. In a Moveon.org petition over 55,000 people have signed asking for Wasserman-Schultz’’s resignation. She is alienating new voters and those who are voting for Sanders. And she has definitely put a wedge between the party establishment and its liberal base. This is not what makes a healthy primary campaign or a healthy party. For the sake of both, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz needs to be replaced as soon as possible.

Group Reviewing Sanders Data Breach Has History Of Illegal Wiretapping, Falsifying Data, And More
Curious Choice of Auditor for Democratic Database Flap
Kroll, hired by DNC to investigate Sanders campaign, doesn’t seem very independent from the DNC

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387