Rhode Island fast food workers arrested in Hartford


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Thirteen fast food workers were arrested during a civil disobedience action in Hartford yesterday, seven of them were from Rhode Island. Here’s my story:

DSC_1586
Charles under arrest

“Do you have any sharp items in your pocket?” asked the police officer.

“No,” said Charles, a forty year old black man wearing his Burger King uniform. Charles, who I had met long before he was involved with the fight to secure a living wage for fast food workers, is always polite.

“Do you have any medical issues?”

“No.”

“Okay. I’m placing you under arrest.”

Charles stood up, placed his hands behind his back and, after the plastic cuffs were fastened, was escorted to the waiting police van. With that, the Fight for a $15 minimum wage officially entered it’s civil disobedience phase.

DSC_0600Some variation of this routine played out 12 more times around noon on Thursday in front of a McDonald’s restaurant in Hartford. More than half of those arrested were from Rhode Island. Six of the Rhode Islanders work in the same Wendy’s in Warwick. The rest were from Hartford, and at least two of them worked in the same McDonalds they were protesting.

DSC_1286“I’ve never seen security guards at that McDonalds before,” said a worker at the discussion held after the action was over, “they were wearing black suits and sunglasses and everything.” I had to agree. They looked more like the Men in Black than mall-level rent-a-cops.

“Shows that they have money…” said someone.

“…and they don’t know how to spend it,” laughed another.

DSC_1632McDonalds left the actual arresting of the protesters to the Hartford cops, not private security. One by one the thirteen fast food workers were loaded into a hot and stuffy police van. Despite not having any medical issues of which he was aware, Stacey, a twenty something black man and Providence native in a Wendys uniform, started having a seizure. By the time the police van arrived at the makeshift booking site a couple blocks away, Stacey needed an ambulance, and was taken to the hospital.

The Fight for a $15 minimum wage has been slowly gaining traction and scoring significant victories over the last year. Seattle recently passed a $15 minimum wage and San Francisco and Chicago may soon follow. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) ruled that the McDonalds Corporation is a “joint employer” with its franchisees, making the restaurant corporation responsible for “illegally firing, threatening or otherwise penalizing workers for their pro-labor activities,” according to the New York Times, a decision that may make unionizing fast food workers easier.

Not bad for a nascent movement that has so far relied on one day strikes and picket lines to get its message across, but corporate interests are starting to hit back. The deep-pocketed McDonalds Corporation, a longtime opponent of unions,  claims the NLRB ruling goes against “decades of established law” and is expected to appeal the ruling all the way to the Supreme Court, if need be. Meanwhile, several states, including Oklahoma and Rhode Island, have passed measures preventing cities from setting their own minimum wage ordinances.

Recognizing that the battleground is shifting, the largest gathering of fast food workers to date met outside Chicago in late July, and unanimously decided “to conduct a wave of civil disobedience actions.” Sponsored by the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), the driving theme of the meeting was that the Fight for $15 was the latest in a long line of civil rights battles that prioritized economic justice. Representative Keith Ellison, (D-MN), no stranger to civil rights battles as the first Muslim American in Congress, explicitly spelled this out when he said to the crowd, “What you are doing right now is the most important workers’ movement in America today.”

DSC_1453
Samuel Velez

“‘We talked a lot about civil disobedience,’ Samuel Velez, a McDonalds employee from Hartford, said. “What we’re doing; fighting for our rights is really important. It was very good that a whole bunch of workers came together as one and spoke about what we’re going to do next, and that we got feedback about how we’re doing.’”

—-

Stacey, Reggie, Corey, Jo Ann, Charles, Staria and Kenya
Stacey, Reggie, Corey, Jo Ann, Charles, Staria and Kenya

The drive from Providence to Hartford is nearly silent. There are seven fast food workers in the rental van with me and the mood is contemplative. In addition to Charles and Stacey, I’m driving with Jo Ann, Staria, Reggie, Kenya and Corey.

“Everybody’s so quiet,” says Jo Ann, a Wendys worker.

“Maybe people are nervous about being arrested,” I suggest. I also suspect that the group is being less boisterous in the presence of media.

“Maybe,” says Jo Ann, “but most of us just finished a full day of work and we’re just tired.”

DSC_1733
Jo Ann

Jo Ann has the heart of an activist, and she’s a natural leader. She became involved in this effort because at her job, everyone received a ten cents per hour raise, “whether they deserved it or not. Good worker or bad, you got ten cents. It wasn’t fair, and it meant hard work was meaningless.” Then, shortly after the raise, and adding injury to insult, the employees all had their hours cut by a third. Jo Ann went from just over thirty hours a week to just over twenty. The cut in hours obliterated the paltry pay increase.

Unhappy with the treatment she and her fellow fast food workers were receiving Jo Ann went online and started to look up her rights as a fast food employee living in Rhode Island. She quickly learned that the laws in Rhode Island had almost nothing to say about her right to be treated fairly by her employer. At this point she began searching the internet for alternatives. This is how she discovered the nascent Fight for $15 movement and the SEIU. It wasn’t long before Jo Ann was talking about fair treatment and fair pay to her co-workers, and not long after that she found herself walking the picket line.

Early on, Jo Ann could have left her job at Wendys. “I was looking around, and found a job as a manager at a McDonald’s. I was offered the job over the phone, but I turned it down, because even though it meant more pay and more hours, I would have been leaving behind all the friends I had made at my Wendys.”

Staria
Staria

Jo Ann likes her job. She likes meeting people, likes her co-workers and likes serving food to hungry customers, but she isn’t being paid enough to live on, and as tough as the low pay is for her, it can be much worse for her co-workers. Jo Ann stays because she feels a sense of responsibility to her co-workers, and its obvious that her co-workers think a lot of her. “How could anyone not like Jo Ann,” says Staria, a young black woman and co-worker, “she’s like the nicest person ever.”

Charles
Charles

Charles often has to decide between buying medicine or paying his rent. This despite the fact that Charles has a job, albeit one that doesn’t pay him enough to live on. “I’ve been working at Burger King for ten years, and I’m still making minimum,” says Charles. Meanwhile, some of the managers, claims Charles, make $25 an hour plus benefits. Charles is one of the nicest people you could meet. I ask him if he’s nervous about being arrested. He’s not.

“When it happens it happens,” says Charles.

The fast food workers will get some training in nonviolence and civil disobedience before the first action, scheduled for 10:30 at a nearby Burger King. They will learn how to be arrested in a way that will prevent them from getting hurt or incurring charges of resisting arrest as they are (hopefully) booked and released. During their training the workers will be encouraged to express themselves freely, without fear of judgement.

“I’ve been getting arrested every month since 1972,” jokes Steve, who will be training the workers on how to get arrested. When asked about the cops, Steve is reassuring, “These guys here in Hartford are very cool. They have a lot of experience and they don’t mess with us.”

Ben, the SEIU organizer running the action in Hartford, doesn’t want me at the training, because the workers should be free to express their concerns with some measure of privacy.  I’m cool with that, but I also get the impression that he doesn’t trust the press. “We’ve been attacked from the left,” says Ben, confirming my hunch. I don’t argue for access, I’m sure I’ll have plenty to write about.

Appearing at the Comfort Inn breakfast buffet, where the Providence contingent is gathered, Ben enthuses, “Today is going to be fucking awesome!” He has just heard from his people in Rhode Island that a strike notice has been delivered through the drive thru window of the Warwick Wendys to the manager on duty. Upon hearing what that it was a strike notice, the manager reportedly refused to touch the paper. Pretty much the entire lunch crew is in Hartford, leaving Wendys in Warwick with no workers for the afternoon.

The two most important things these workers need for today’s actions are their uniforms, which will instantly mark them as fast food workers, and their identification cards, to make it easier for the police to process them after their arrest.

Getting arrested is the plan. One day strikes have had the impact they’re going to have, and it’s time to take the Fight for $15 to the next level, goes the logic. There’s no reason for the police to be angry or agitated. This should be a simple book and release, but of course the ongoing scandal of Ferguson is all over the news, and good number of the fast food workers involved in these actions are people of color.

“The majority of people in Hartford are black or Puerto Rican,” says Steve, explaining that the cops are wary of coming off like Ferguson. Hartford has its own police brutality controversy currently making its way through the courts in the tasering of teenager Luis Anglero. Police across the country know that the world will be watching them during these civil disobedience actions. There are reportedly 150 cities involved today and it will be covered by all the news channels, so the cops will be on their best behavior.

As if to confirm the attention being focused on today’s actions, the Today Show runs a short piece as the workers make there way to their training.

DSC_0769At 10am about thirty fast food workers and supporters march inside the Burger King next door to the Comfort Inn, chanting and waving signs. The manager on duty says, “if you come in here I’m calling the police,” but she is ignored. The protesters ask the staff of the restaurant to join them in their chants, but none do. Mostly they look nervous as they try to fill customer orders.

DSC_0826A few customers evidence annoyance at the protest, but most seemed pleased by the show. At least one customer joined in with the chants. The protesters quieted only long enough to catch the tail end of a CNN report about today’s planned civil disobedience actions. There was laughter at this. The protesters exited the restaurant chanting, “We’ll be back!” As the vans pulled out of the Burger King parking lot, the police arrived.

DSC_0835Unlike the contemplative ride from Providence the night before, the atmosphere in the van as we traveled from the Burger King near the hotel to the McDonalds in Hartford was electric. The first taste of protest had energized the group and they were ready for more. I found out that Jo Ann had attended the big meeting in Chicago where fast food workers had decided to engage in civil disobedience. Today’s actions are the first since she helped to decide on the direction this cause is going to take in the future. Staria is sorry to have missed the Chicago meet. She enjoys the unity and community this drive for fair wages has provided her..

DSC_0937As we pulled into the parking lot that would serve as the staging area for the march to the McDonalds, everyone noticed that the cops were already out in force. Across the street were about seven cops, huddled together in conversation. More joined them. Local community leaders, labor leaders and labor friendly politicians had announced the fast food workers’ intentions to the police, and the cops were there to direct traffic ahead of the march.

Speeches were given and there were rallying cries for solidarity. The best speeches, as usual, came from the workers themselves.

“I’m fighting for 15 for my son but not only for my son but for everyone else who is scared to come out and fight with us,” said Samuel Velez to the crowd.

Salvador Lopez spoke of being fired for his unionization efforts, and getting his job back with the help of union representatives. Both Samuel and Salvador work at the McDonalds they are planning to protest.

DSC_1044I followed the quarter mile march and was pleased to see the positive reaction from many on the street. Many people joined the march, including a young mother pushing a baby stroller. There were drummers and chants lead by the Reverend A.J. Johnson, who seemed to be giving a crash course in how to energize a crowd. The man was tireless and his energy was infectious.

DSC_1284When we arrived at the McDonalds, the chanting crowd pushed its way into the restaurant, taking over the space for a good amount of time before moving outside, marching around the building and finally stopping at the front of the store, where the thirteen brave volunteers sat down to be arrested in an act of civil disobedience.

The officer in charge listened to the chanting crowd, and then asked the seated protesters to get out of the street. Politely, the protesters refused. The crowd cheered the arrestees on in various call and respond chants. Twice more the officer in charge asked the volunteer arrestees to get out of the street. Twice more they refused.

DSC_1670Calmly, one by one, the thirteen protesters were told that they were under arrest, asked to stand, and taken to the waiting police van. When the van was full the last three of the thirteen were taken away by police cars. The action over, the crowd dispersed.

I went to the staging area a few blocks away where the police were booking and releasing the protesters. Most of them were already free, a few were still receiving their tickets for “disorderly conduct.” It was when I got there that I learned about Stacey, and that he had suffered a seizure in the police van. Kenya had accompanied him to the hospital.

DSC_0752
Stacey

I learned later that Stacey was suffering from dehydration. The entire event had been outside in the hot sun, and in truth none of us had taken the time to eat much of anything since breakfast. Being locked inside the hot and stuffy police van was enough to send Stacey over the edge, but ultimately he was fine and the hospital released him that afternoon.

In the aftermath of the day’s events, the workers and the organizers gathered to review their efforts. On the TV, Fox News reads a statement from the National Restaurant Association, (the other NRA) which declares that the nationwide protests are “a national, multi-million dollar campaign engineered, organized and funded by national labor groups. The activities have proven to be orchestrated union PR events where the vast majority of participants are activists and paid demonstrators.”

DSC_1723There were certainly allies and organizers at the events Hartford, but the majority were clearly fast food workers. I look at Jo Ann, who found this movement on the Internet while working at a tiny fast food joint in Warwick, Rhode Island. She isn’t a paid activist, she’s someone committed to fighting for fair wages and a decent working environment for everyone. To everyone in the room, the NRA statement is obvious baloney.

The workers, those who were arrested and those who cheered them on, enjoyed the air conditioning and the pizza as they listened to reports coming in from bigger actions in Chicago and Detroit. Over 100 protesters were arrested in Detroit. Rumor has it that the police ran out of handcuffs.

This was a big action, and the publicity and the exposure, plus the positive experiences of the participants, has everyone eager to do more. Future actions are being planned, and the contingent from Rhode Island is eager to be involved. They don’t want to just fight for $15, they want to win it.

Kenya
Kenya

DSC_1006

DSC_1095

DSC_1097

DSC_1180

DSC_1185

DSC_1241

DSC_1279

DSC_1328
Reverend A.J. Johnson

DSC_1442

DSC_1535

DSC_1568

DSC_1632

DSC_1659

DSC_1670

DSC_1679

DSC_1690

DSC_1714
Reggie’s ticket for “disorderly conduct”

DSC_1732

Solidarity, from Ferguson to Palestine


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

DSC_9801Since no one interested in social, economic or environmental justice was getting anywhere near the mansion in Newport where President Obama is attending a $32,000 a plate political fundraiser, (in which the 1% will purchase access to the government the rest of us will never know) anti-war activists gathered in Providence, at Burnside Park, to call some small measure of attention to issues that matter.

The response to Obama took place after the Gazan Solidarity Rally, which has been running weekly since Israel’s most recent military siege. As one peace event ended the next seamlessly began. In all about thirty people attended the two events.

The protesters spoke to passersby, handing out flyers that elucidated the similarities between the situation in Gaza under Israeli occupation and conditions in Ferguson, MS in the wake of the shooting death of Mike Brown, an unarmed black man. The list of demands made by the Providence protesters included stopping the war on Gaza, stopping police brutality in communities of color, ending all U.S. aid to Israel, ending U.S. military incursions in the Middle East, ending NSA spying on private citizens, and ending the militarization of the police.

“One reason for our choice of locale,” said Paul Hubbard, spokesperson for the Rhode Island Antiwar Committee, “is that President Obama will be fund-raising among the 1% at a secluded, ocean-front mansion in Newport. The other 99% of his constituents will probably be unable to catch even a glimpse of him, due to the blocked roads and high security surrounding his brief visit. This situation strikingly symbolizes the truth about which groups the U.S. government is really serving.”

Rallies like this seem small and inconsequential when stacked up against $32,000 fund raisers and the corporatization of the military and the militarization of the police, but such rallies offer up another way of thinking about the world and another way of being.

What is being offered is peace, and the courage to embrace it.

Poet and activist Jared Paul read his six-part, “Apartheid Then, Apartheid Now” which you can watch on video below:

DSC_9342

DSC_9362

DSC_9382

DSC_9389

DSC_9397

DSC_9400

DSC_9414

DSC_9430

DSC_9434

DSC_9485

DSC_9490

DSC_9492

DSC_9511

DSC_9551

DSC_9558

DSC_9569

DSC_9595

DSC_9600

DSC_9651

DSC_9655

DSC_9665

DSC_9680

DSC_9692

DSC_9700

DSC_9711

DSC_9738

DSC_9750

DSC_9773

DSC_9776

DSC_9794

DSC_9804

DSC_9857

DSC_9868

DSC_9887

DSC_9891

DSC_9934

Working Women Wednesdays begin at Renaissance and Hilton


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

DSC_7038One of the few bright spots on the Rhode Island economic landscape is tourism, but should our economic successes be built on the backs of women scraping by on minimum wage?

Some hotels downtown pay fair wages and are willing to negotiate with their employees about working conditions. The Providence Renaissance Hotel next to the State House and the Providence Hilton next to the Convention Center do not. The practices at these hotels have been shameful. And to a casual observer, it’s hard not to come to the conclusion that the management at these hotels are specifically targeting young mothers for harassment and termination. (See the pieces I wrote in collaboration with Krystle Martin and Adrienne Jones.)

In response, the hotel workers and Unite Here! 217 have planned an ongoing series of pickets at both hotels, called Working Women Wednesday. Each week a team of protesters will be raising a ruckus at each hotel. Attention will be called to the fact that the profits of the Providence Renaissance Hotel and the Providence Hilton Hotel made by treating working mothers as disposable commodities.

Let’s demand that hotel management do better.

DSC_6578

DSC_6613

DSC_6629

DSC_6647

DSC_6694

DSC_6714

DSC_6743

DSC_6802

DSC_6847

DSC_6856

DSC_6870

DSC_6878

DSC_6901

DSC_6932

DSC_6940

DSC_6945

DSC_6951

DSC_6975

DSC_6997

DSC_7105

DSC_7110

DSC_7117

DSC_7124

DSC_7131

DSC_7190

DSC_7195

DSC_7223

DSC_7251

DSC_7256

DSC_7275

Gina Raimondo and wealth inequality


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

The future of democracy is being threatened and will be determined by our response to the problem of ever increasing wealth inequality. As a very few generate exceptional profits from capital investments, the rest of us recede ever further into relative poverty. Democracy and the open society are under serious threat from snowballing capitalism, which buys elections and access to the political system at prices the average citizen cannot compete with. It is not science fiction to suggest that our children may be slaves in all but name to uncaring oligarchs in some dystopian future.

One of the problems reformers run into is the opaqueness of the financial world. Not only are the systems that govern financial transactions intentionally byzantine and unnecessarily complex, financial actors working within the system do everything they can to obscure who owns what assets, who is paying how much to whom, and by what pathways money tends to flow. Everyone who has seen a movie is familiar with the idea of “shell corporations” and “offshore accounts” as a way of hiding financial assets for nefarious purposes, but few of us are aware of how pervasive these and similar practices are in reality.

If we seek to put an end to ever increasing economic and political inequality and prevent future economic crises similar to or worse than our recent recession, then economic transparency is of the utmost importance. As Thomas Piketty says in his landmark (but far from perfect) Capital in the Twenty-First Century, “there should be clarity about who owns what assets around the world.” (page 518)

Piketty argues that the debate around growing inequality and the management of global capitalism is operating in the dark. We have no reliable data about who owns what and how much money they are making. A significant portion of the world’s wealth seems to be squirreled away into secret black market accounts. Without accurate data, we are flying blind and suggesting solutions to problems we don’t fully understand.

It is in this light that I see the actions of Treasurer Gina Raimondo as contrary to the public good. Raimondo, far from fighting for the rights and economic prosperity of all Rhode Islanders, seems more interested in veiling herself and her allies from financial scrutiny. For instance, Raimondo’s use of a blind trust, to hide her investments and income from scrutiny during her gubernatorial campaign, flaunts economic clarity and openness.

More problematic is the outrageous letter Raimondo sent to the RI Attorney General’s office, in which the treasurer maintains that revealing the amount of money Rhode Island pays to its hedge fund managers might put hedge fund managers at risk of kidnapping! From David Sirota at the International Business Times:

Citing the case of Eddie Lampert, an investor who was abducted in 2003 by ransom-seeking kidnappers, the letter to Assistant Rhode Island Attorney General Michael Field from Raimondo’s office further argued that disclosing too much information about financial fees and compensation could endanger the lives of hedge fund managers.

The amount of money people like Treasurer Raimondo make from their jobs as elected officials pales to insignificance when compared to the amount of money they generate from their capital investments. If people were given a true picture of how wealth is distributed, there would be outrage. This is why financial transactions and the ownership of assets is hidden, and why a new era of financial transparency is mandatory if we wish to preserve our democracy.

Otherwise, the only viable financial plan for those wishing to avoid economic serfdom may be the realization of Treasurer Raimondo’s worst fears: the kidnapping and ransoming of the 1%.

Unitarian Universalists come out big in support for fair wages in Rhode Island


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

DSC_1193The Unitarian Universalist Association (UUA) is having their annual General assembly in Providence this weekend, and today around noon they held a rally outside the Renaissance Hotel near the State House to support worker’s rights to a fair and just living wage, and to demonstrate against the draconian and anti-democratic tactics used by state officials to stop hotel workers from raising the minimum wage in Providence. Well over two hundred people made the trek from the Convention Center, where the UUA GA is being held, to the empty lot outside the Renaissance to chant, hear speeches and sing for economic and social justice.

Pastor Santiago Rodriguez, of the Gloria Dei Lutheran Church located between the Providence Place Mall and the Renaissance Hotel, emceed the event, introducing speakers and leading the crowd in chants of “Show Your Love to the Workers” and “Fair Wages.”

Also speaking was local legend Yilenny Ferreras, hotel worker and one of the four hunger strikers who shamed the Rhode Island legislature into making a small gesture of raising the minimum wage in the state to $9. Her speeches are full of fire, and her story resonated with the crowd.

Reverend James Ford of the First Unitarian Church in Providence and Reverend Ellen Quaadgras of the Westminster Unitarian Church in East Greenwich spoke next. It was under the leadership of Ford that the UUA General assembly made the difficult decision to boycott the 850 rooms they had originally asked for at the Renaissance. Given the hotel’s refusal to fairly engage with its employees over union and salary, plus its loss of LGBTQ friendly TAG Approved status, it would have been hypocritical to do any less. Still, 850 rooms were a lot to make up for, and the UUA GA had to scramble to find adequate lodging for all their attendees.

Speaking next was B Doubour, a fast food worker at Wendy’s who spoke of the difficulty she has paying bills and supporting her kids on the minimum wages the company pays.

Lauren Jacobs, National Organizing Director for Restaurant Opportunities Centers United spoke next, reminding the audience that the real minimum wage in Rhode Island is not $8, it’s $2.89. That’s what tipped workers in Rhode Island are entitled to. Often, their checks from the company they work for are for $0 after taxes are taken out. “Do you know what they call a worker who works for free?” Jacobs asked. “A slave!” answered the crowd.

The Rev. Amy Carol Webb, Musician and Minister at River of Grass UU Congregation in Ft. Lauderdale then lead the crowd in a song.

Rabbi Jonathan Klein, Executive Director of Clergy and Laity United for Economic Justice in Los Angeles spoke next about the need for organizing around social justice issues. He hopes Rhode Islanders can get past difference is race, class and union divides to work together for a fair living wage for everyone.

Donald Anderson, of the RI Council of Churches, told the crowd that his group fully supported the efforts of workers in Rhode Island to earn a living wage.

After the speakers were finished Jesse Strecker, Executive Director of Rhode Island Jobs With Justice asked the crowd to follow Pastor Santiago Rodriguez into the hotel to speak with Renaissance Hotel Manager Angelo DePeri about an employee who faces termination due to their involvement with the unionization effort. As the crowd moved from the field to the parking lot, Providence Police and hotel security intercepted telling the leaders that the hotel, a public building receiving over a million dollars in tax breaks from the City of Providence every year, was not letting anyone from the crowd inside. In fact, DePeri was not interested in meeting even one person from the crowd as a representative.

The fact is, good and moral people want fair wages for all workers. The battle for economic justice has begun.

DSC_1091

DSC_1122

DSC_1127
Rev. Donald Anderson

DSC_1128

DSC_1131

DSC_1134

DSC_1143

DSC_1150

DSC_1151

DSC_1169
Yilenny Ferreras

DSC_1185

DSC_1217

DSC_1241

DSC_1250
Rev. James Ford

DSC_1267

DSC_1271

DSC_1280

DSC_1287

DSC_1289

DSC_1292

DSC_1297
Rev. Ellen Quaadgras
DSC_1317
Pastor Santiago Rodriguez
DSC_1341
B Doubour, Wendy’s worker
DSC_1386
Lauren Jacobs, National Organizing Director, Restaurant Opportunities Centers United

DSC_1393

DSC_1399
Rev. Amy Carol Webb

DSC_1406

DSC_1409

DSC_1410

DSC_1416

DSC_1434
Rabbi Jonathan Klein, Executive Director, Clergy and Laity United for Economic Justice

DSC_1445

DSC_1485
Jesse Strecker, Executive Director, Rhode Island Jobs With Justice
DSC_1503
Confronted by hotel security

DSC_1516

DSC_1521

DSC_1525

DSC_1526

DSC_1530

DSC_1540

DSC_1547

DSC_1548

All pictures and video above are available for use under the Creative Commons license. Please use them far and wide.

(cc) 2014 Steve Ahlquist

Nurses to Women & Infants Hospital: stop hiring scabs (‘travel nurses’)


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

DSC_0636An all day picket was held at Women & Infants Hospital yesterday to call attention to the problem of temporary, out-of-state “travel nurses” filling scheduling holes than hiring in-state nurses graduating from one of the many fine colleges offering nursing degrees in Rhode Island.

“There are many qualified graduates from our numerous nursing programs looking for jobs,” said Patrick Quinn, executive vice president of 1199 SEIU New England, “so it baffles me that Care New England management would take advantage of all the tax breaks of a non-profit but not give back to the community when we have such a high unemployment crisis.”

Care New England is the company presently managing Women & Infants.

Hiring travel nurses means that the salaries leave the state when the nurses are done. There are no savings in terms of wages as travel nurses make two and three times the standard rate of pay. Further, all full-time permanent nurses are given weeks of in house training and orientation that the temporary travel nurses skip. They are simply plugged into scheduling holes without any real orientation or training in hospital specific policies. This creates even more work for the regular staff, who spend time correcting the mistakes of the travel nurses.

Given these issues, why use travel nurses? To avoid hiring more union workers, of course.

This is just another example of a company engaging in dangerous, impractical strategies to avoid treating workers with respect and dignity. Even as the ACA funnels millions of new dollars into the health care industry, private companies, eager to squeeze ever more profits for their shareholders and overpaid CEOs, take shortcuts at the expense of their staff and patients.

My wife and I went to Women and Infants over 20 years ago to have our three children. The experience was top notch, and the nurses were fabulous. To think that the new management might threaten the reputation of such a fine hospital by playing games with the quality of the staff is appalling. As Wendy Laprade, a Registered Nurse in the Labor and Delivery Room said, “Women & Infants… will only remain the premier women’s hospital in Southern New England if we hire and train the next generation of RN’s.”

With all the talk surrounding a new nursing school being built in Rhode Island, and knowing that there will be a huge demand for nurses as the population ages over the next decade, Care New England’s policy decisions seem extremely short-sighted and counterproductive. Currently there are 30-35 traveling nurses estimated to be working at Women & Infants. This Pro Publica piece from 2009 highlights some of the dangers these policies exacerbate.

Supporting the union effort at Women & Infants were several other unions, as well as gubernatorial candidate Clay Pell and many other candidates for office. Also out in full support of the union’s efforts were three of the four hunger strikers, Shelby Maldonado, Mirjaam Parada and Yilenny Ferrares, and other hotel workers who worked so hard for a living wage in Providence, only to be cut down by backroom dealings in the General Assembly.

Quinn
Patrick Quinn, 1199 SEIU

nurses

pell nurse
Clay Pell

DSC_0672

DSC_0687

DSC_0688

DSC_0705

DSC_0717

DSC_0720

DSC_0725

DSC_0738

DSC_0748

DSC_0762

DSC_0767

DSC_0782

DSC_0788

DSC_0800

DSC_0813

DSC_0835

DSC_0838

DSC_0848

DSC_0872
Seth Magaziner
DSC_0899
Guillaume de Ramel
DSC_0904
Frank Caprio
DSC_0916
George Nee, AFL-CIO RI
Stan Israel
Stan Israel, retired SEIU 1199 organizer

DSC_0931

DSC_0937
Shelby Maldonado, former hunger striker
DSC_0938
Mirjaam Parada, former hunger striker
DSC_0947
State Rep. Frank Ferri

DSC_0952

DSC_0955

DSC_0956

DSC_0958
Maureen Martin

DSC_0962

DSC_0968
Aaron Regunberg
DSC_0972
State Rep. David Bennett
DSC_0975
Yilenny Ferrares, former hunger striker

DSC_0981

Final throes of 38 Studios protest, 2014 version


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Occupy Providence and friends about to deliver a no bailout petition at the Rhode Island State House

Yesterday, there was a protest at the State House against the 38 Studios bailout.  Let me cite from the announcement over at the Occupy Providence website.

Occupy Providence and friends about to deliver a no bailout petition at the Rhode Island State House
A visit to the Rhode Island State House

  This  one of the worst shady deals that politicians have made in Rhode Island. Now, they are trying to stick the People with the bill.

Wall Street has weighed in, trying to pressure the State to use the People’s money to bail out this bad deal for which the People never asked. Should Rhode Island be a place where insider deals get made behind the scenes, while those who hope to profit from these shady deals can be sure of getting paid at the People’s expense?

The Rhode Island will never have a solid economy until it shakes its reputation for paying off these shady deals. Refusing to bail out 38 Studios debt will help put the State on the right track by discouraging other bad deals in the future. The State will be much better off it shows it is willing to resist Wall Streets pressure for a bailout.

38 Studios debt is not the People’s debt; let the insurance company that insured the deal pay!

What else needs to happen

Christopher Currie was at a State House with a handout containing the following  article of the Rhode Island State Constitution:

ARTICLE VI (OF THE LEGISLATIVE POWER)

Section 16. Borrowing power of general assembly. — The general assembly shall have no powers, without the express consent of the people, to incur state debts to an amount exceeding fifty thousand dollars, except in time of war, or in case of insurrection or invasion; nor shall it in any case, without such consent, pledge the faith of the state for the payment of the obligations of others. This section shall not be construed to refer to any money that may be deposited with the state by the government of the United States.

Conventional 1% wisdom, equipped with massive amounts of neo-liberalist economic theory and ruling class case law, will solemnly explain that this article does not apply to the 38 Studio situation.  As to the economic part of the argument, this summary of Chris Hedges will suffice:

Unfettered capitalism is a revolutionary force that consumes greater and greater numbers of human lives until it finally consumes itself.

Those who are not willfully blind can see this destruction develop in front of their eyes, but there is and alternative (TIA)

This is how we’ll be competitive in a resilient, local economy, while we say farewell to self-destructive neo-liberalism for the few:

Workers will create their cooperative businesses owned by the folks who do the actual work. Nobody wants to be a wage slave in a medieval, 1% fiefdom!  The folks who will run these places will take good care of them.  They will not threaten to leave the State to get special deals.  No, they’ll be good citizens who won’t indulge in the smug blackmail of the self-entitled rich.

Those co-op folks will be our fellow Rhode Islanders and neighbors. They will live here among us with their families and friends. They will cherish our communities and they will heal Mother Earth the ravages the rich have visited upon her.

As we say farewell to the destructive capitalism for and by the Vampire class, and kiss its capital and its “investments” goodbye, we’ll build a local economy with food security, and clean water and fresh air for all.  We’ll have a power grid owned and operated locally and cooperatively by the People for the People.

We’ll make an end to a system that creates borders for people and maintains global inequality and racism.  We’ll put an end to NAFTA-, TAFTA-, TPP-globalization, which removes those borders to free the United Corporations of the World so they can destroy human solidarity and increase inequality and poverty, which Gandhi saw as the worst kind of violence of all.

As to the State Constitution, it is a living document. Let’s blow new life into it on the People’s terms!

This is what non-violent revolution looks like; cursed be 1% case law be and the predator economy!  We need system change; bailouts do nothing but perpetuate the current system.

Nick Mattiello cowers to corporate interests


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

The article, House speaker outlines state’s economic priorities, in the Providence Journal started badly. Paul Grimaldi wrote,

“The newly elected speaker of the house told a roomful of business people Thursday that fixing the state’s fiscal problems is his priority.”

mattiello2I didn’t vote for Mattiello for speaker, nor did you. He was “elected” by a bunch of frightened representatives after just a few days of discussion. There was no political campaign, no public discussion. Yet he’s the “elected speaker”?

And he’s talking to a group of “business people” at a Chamber of Commerce breakfast in the Kirkbrae Country Club. He’s reassuring them. Why? Because he’s counting on their contributions to his campaign and any political action groups he might be setting up in the wake of Gordon Fox’s resignation.

In the article, Mattiello says that 38 Studios was one of the biggest debacles in the country’s history.” Really? Did he miss the Real Estate Bubble? The Dot.Com implosion? Stock Market Crash of 1929? Teapot Dome? 38 Studios has been and remains a huge sucking chest wound in Rhode Island’s economy, but it’s not the worst thing that’s ever happened in the US, not even in the state. Remember the Credit Union crisis?

But, having recently returned from a visit to the Bond Rating Folk in New York, Mattiello claims that we have no choice but to repay our “Moral Obligation.”

Let me reframe that little trip as a school yard scene…

Roger the Rocket wants a new video game! He doesn’t have enough money to buy the game, and Wally the Banker won’t lend him the money. But Little Rhody, who wants to be Roger’s friend, and thinks he’ll be able to play the game too, promises to pay Wally the Banker back if Wally will lend Roger the Rocket the money.

Wally loans Roger the money. Roger loses it on his way to the store. Roger can’t pay, but Wally says that Little Rhody has to pay.

Little Rhody doesn’t know what to do. Rhody didn’t have the money either! So Rhody goes to Wally the Banker’s friend, Bondy, who gives out grades of A, B and Junk, and ask them for advice. 

What do you think Bondy told Little Rhody to do?

Juvenile? Yes. Simplistic. Yes. Realistic? Startlingly so.

But the bad news is that the article keeps getting worse. Mattiello is telling these business people everything they want to hear. He’s going to lower corporate taxes. He’s going to raise the estate tax threshold.

One proposed bill, whose “nuances” he refused to discuss, would shift the way corporations taxes are assessed, from property, payroll and sales to just sales. In theory, this would increase revenue (presumably because they’d increase the taxes on corporate sales?), but in reality it looks like another big tax break for CVS. Think about it. What’s the biggest corporation in this state with the most employees and the most property?

Poor Little Rhody doesn’t know what to do. The rich kids all have so much money. Rhody wants to play in their playground. Maybe if Rhody will do whatever the rich kids say, then Rhody will be popular and have money too!

What do you think Rhody will do?

Broad support for $15 hotel worker wage among PVD voters


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

hotel poll GraphA poll of likely Providence voters released today found that an “overwhelming 64% support the $15 minimum wage for hotel workers,” according to the poll conducted by Dapa Research. Rsearchers spoke with 600 likely Providence voters giving the data a four point margin of error.

Check out a power point on the poll here and the full breakdown here.

City councilors, mayoral candidates and candidates for governor should take note: The majority of voters want people to be paid a fair and equitable working wage for the hard work they do.

Pollster David A. Paleologos said, “Among those who felt the minimum wage issue would make a difference in the governor’s race and mayor’s race, the issue could be impactful; by a 3-1 margin voters said they would be less likely to vote for Angel Taveras (for Governor) and Michael Solomon (for Mayor) if they opposed it.”

The numbers run:

Taveras
More likely to vote for him if he opposes: 10%
Less likely to vote for him if he opposes: 32%
Makes no difference: 46%

Solomon
More likely to vote for him if he opposes: 11%
Less likely to vote for him if he opposes: 30%
Makes no difference: 43%

Two hotels in Providence, the Omni and the Biltmore, already pay their housekeepers around $15 an hour. Testimony at the City Hall on Tuesday night from one such worker demonstrated the differences in lifestyle and opportunity such a wage brought one such housekeeper and her children. As she put it, she can actually afford to save money for her children to go to college. 58% of survey respondents found this to be a compelling reason to support the measure.

This measure, upon passage, will affect around 1000 hotel workers, the majority of whom live in the city. Nearly 58% of respondents agreed that “An increase in their wages would mean they have more money to invest in their homes and to spend in local businesses in their neighborhoods.” As a Providence landlord suggested at Tuesday night’s hearings, this measure would allow hotel workers the opportunity to actually afford to live in the kind decent apartments he rents.

This measure has broad-based support, ranging from 57% to 78%, in all demographics save one: 60% of registered Republicans oppose the measure. Still, it should be noted that nearly a third of registered Republicans support the measure. According to the survey, “Support was broad-based in all neighborhoods of Providence including 57% in the Mt. Pleasant/Elmhurst area, 58% in the East Side, 66% in the No. End, Silver Lake, and Smith Hill areas, 69% in Federal Hill, and 73% in the South Providence/Washington Park areas.”

The survey results are clear: this measure is popular, long overdue and more than that, it is the right thing to do.

Tonight the Ordinance Committee of the Providence City Council will be meeting to decide whether or not to send the measure to the full City Council for a vote. Readers should call their City Councillors and letting them know of your support for this measure.

.

Photos: First of two ‘Fight for $15’ events today!


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
DSC_7341
Charles, 10 year Burger King employee

With a last minute change of location from the Dunkin’ Donuts on Broad St. in Central Falls to the Burger King on Lonsdale Ave., Jobs with Justice launched their fourth action for $15 an hour and and unionization for fast food workers. Burger King management kept the doors to the restaurant locked but they couldn’t stop the voices of workers demanding fair wages for long hours of work. Towards the end, Charles, a ten year employee of Burger King, spoke briefly about the impossibility of supporting oneself on the paltry wages on offer. The next event is at noon in Warwick, I’ll have pictures from that event soon.

DSC_7226

DSC_7231

DSC_7238

DSC_7246

DSC_7247

DSC_7249

DSC_7254

DSC_7264

DSC_7294

DSC_7302

DSC_7314

DSC_7316

DSC_7342

DSC_7346

DSC_7347

DSC_7364

Ticket fairness: Fix it or fail it


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

ticketsOn the surface, the Ticket Fairness Act, pending in the General Assembly, looks like a consumer protection act that hurts the scalpers. In reality, it is exactly the opposite. As written, the law allows venues and ticket agents to transfer to themselves any quantity of tickets to resell at inflated prices.

As with many things in Rhode Island politics, it’s not so much what the bill says as what it doesn’t say. By comparing the RI bill—which is nearly identical to legislation pushed in other states by the dominant ticketing agent, Ticketmaster—to New York state’s law, considered the gold standard for actual consumer protections, we can see how our legislators are foisting upon us yet another thinly-veiled ripoff.

Hot scalper-on-scalper action!

“The music business is a cruel and shallow money trench, a long plastic hallway where thieves and pimps run free, and good men die like dogs. There’s also a negative side.”

~ Hunter Thompson

Dr. Gonzo only says this because it’s 100% true. This is a story where there are no “good guys”.

The genesis of this legislation is that Ticketmaster and their cronies (Live Nation and Ticket Exchange) are watching other, equally evil entities (StubHub) make giant amounts of money to which they feel entitled. It’s not that they actually want to protect the general public from getting ripped off. It’s that they want to be the ones that do it.

The amount of money in this shallow trench is stupefying, easily enough to motivate the most heinous behavior. That two gangs would fight over controlling it should surprise nobody.

A ticket to a hot concert at the Dunk can sell for 10 or 20 times the face value. If you can get your hand on 1,000 tickets for $50 and resell them for $500, that’s $450,000 in pure profit for basically doing nothing. That’s roughly half a million bucks for one night’s ripoff.

The RI bill does, in fact, make it much harder for StubHub to get their hands on large blocks of tickets. At the same time, it virtually guarantees that either the venue or the ticket agent will sell themselves large blocks of tickets to scalp at outrageous prices.

Are Johnny and Jenny Music Fan protected in any way? Absolutely not.

How a true entertainment capital handles this

In RI, we have maybe three or four venues that attract shows worth the attention of big-time scalpers. In New York City, that’s one block on Broadway. No other place in the US has more invested in a thriving entertainment sector than New York. Not Branson, MO; not Nashville; not Memphis; not even Las Vegas.

New York state has a comprehensive law to regulate ticket sales and resales that truly protects the general public. This law—Article 25—contains provisions that the RI bill lacks. By adding these provisions to the RI bill, the GA could actually do something good for the people of RI.

Specifically, Section 25.30 regulates not ticket resellers but the original sellers, called “operators” in their law and “issuers” in the RI bill. 25.30.3 states:

No operator or operator’s agent shall sell or convey tickets to any secondary  ticket  reseller  owned  or  controlled  by  the operator or operator’s agent.

24 words; problem solved. We find no such provision in the RI bill, but any legislator could introduce such an amendment.

You know what? Bunk that. It shouldn’t be any legislator; it should be Senator Josh Miller, who somehow is a co-sponsor in the senate. Your Frymaster is actually quite disappointed in the feisty Cranstonian that he could be bamboozled to such an extent.

As a savvy business professional, working specifically in the Downcity nightlife sector, one has to wonder how this multi-venue owner could not see through these shenanigans. And it’s much better for all of us if the question is “how” and not “why”.

Senator Miller, please fix this bill or withdraw your support and act to defeat it.

Addendum: E-tickets

Others on the left make an equally strong argument that the “any ticketing means” provision of the RI bill only serves to let venues and agents control resale by regular ticket buyers. This is true, but not the focus of this post. Interested readers can find the fix for this particular nastiness in NY 25.30 (c) that specifies that ticket buyers must be able to control resale of their tickets without interference by the venue or agent.

 

On tax equity, RIPEC salves the souls of the House Finance Committee


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
John Simmons of RIPEC
John Simmons of RIPEC

Last evening the RI House Finance Committee heard testimony on two bills that would increase the marginal tax rate on people making more than $200,000 a year. Representative Maria Cimini proposed a 2% increase, from 5.99 to 7.99% on incomes over $250,000, while Representative Larry Valencia proposed a 4.01% increase on incomes over $200,000 for individuals and $250,00 for married couples.

Valencia asked the committee to explain the effectiveness of tax cuts for the rich (starting in 1996) given that these were supposed to bring more jobs to Rhode Island, not less, as evidenced by our high unemployment. Appeals to reason however, were not found persuasive by the committee.

At least ten people spoke in favor of the bills, some telling very moving stories about the way they struggle in a state that continues to cut services and cut assistance to our cities and towns, resulting in higher property taxes. In fact, it’s the property taxes that are hitting these Rhode Islanders the hardest, even as the myopic House Leadership continues to champion a policy of across the board tax cuts, curbs on spending and other austerity measures. The impassioned pleas of struggling Rhode Islanders fell on deaf ears, because appeals to compassion were not found to be persuasive.

Everyone knows that the bills proposed by Cimini and Valencia are going nowhere this year. Chairperson Raymond Gallison, recently appointed to his position by Speaker Mattiello, shaped the discourse by calling up all those in favor of the bills and listening politely, reserving the last word for John Simmons, executive director of a right wing think tank, the Rhode Island Public Expenditure Council (RIPEC). Gallison and Simmons are on a first name basis, and Simmons’ testimony was welcomed as a breath of fresh air.

Simmons simply restated the same things RIPEC says every year. Increasing taxes is wrong. The rich already face a higher tax burden than the poor. We shouldn’t be targeting the job creators. Philosophically, why should we be punishing those who are successful? The rich are rich because they are better than the poor, more deserving than the poor, and more important than the middle class. Here’s Simmons’ closing argument:

“Then there’s the philosophic issue, I guess I want to address that. It’s a little bit different. Is it because we can tax people who can make money and are successful that we should? Is that the philosophy we want for people to come to Rhode Island and grow a business here? If you make money we can take it from you? I don’t know that that’s the right message to send to people who want to come to Rhode Island. It’s the opposite. If you are successful we would like you to come to Rhode Island.”

Note that Simmons is not all that interested in those who already live in Rhode Island. He isn’t talking about improving the lives of Rhode Islanders, instead he’s talking about making Rhode Island a haven for the rich and successful. If Rhode Islanders are lucky, I suppose, we might find jobs shining the shoes and cleaning the yachts of our more deserving citizens.

This is what Gallison, representing House Leadership as Chairperson of House Finance, found persuasive: A naked appeal to everything he wants to believe is true, despite all evidence to the contrary. It’s called motivated reasoning, a process of having a conclusion and then searching for reasons to believe it. No contrary examples, no logic, no amount of suffering and no evidence contrary to the deeply held belief will be truly considered.

So what do you say to the man who eases your mind and continues to guide you down the primrose path of massive economic inequality? What do you say to the man who confirms all your biases and tells you that everything you sincerely wish were true is true and good, despite the nagging fear at the back of your mind that tells you it’s all a lie?

Gallison said, “Thank you very much John, I appreciate it.”

SCOTUS McCutcheon ruling further erodes US democracy


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

JusticeNot since Roe v. Wade has a  U.S. Supreme Court decision permeated the public consciousness quite like the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) case. In 2010, the nation’s highest court opened the campaign finance floodgates when – in a 5-4 decision – they sided with lawyers for the anti- Hillary Clinton political action committee (PAC) Citizens United who argued that PACs not be required to disclose their donors identities or the amounts of money they had contributed.

Bold and continuing campaign finance reform in our nations capitol began in Washington, D.C., in 1971 and continued until 2002. The 1971 Federal Election Campaign Act required the disclosure of donors’ identities and the amounts they contributed to federal election campaigns.

A little known Supreme Court decision that, at its heart, concluded that the spending of money equals free speech was handed down in 1976. A Supreme Court majority held that a key provision of the Campaign Finance Act, which limited expenditure on election campaigns was “unconstitutional”, and contrary to the First Amendment.

The leading opinion viewed spending money as a form of political “speech” which could not be restricted due to the First Amendment. The only interest was in preventing “corruption or its appearance”, and only personal contributions should be targeted because of the danger of “quid pro quo” exchanges.

The 2002 Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act – better known as the McCain-Feingold Act after the bill’s primary sponsors, Republican John McCain and Democrat Russ Feingold – strengthened restrictions, but did nothing to challenge or reverse the Supreme Court’s previous rulings.

Essentially, the Citizens United case boiled down to this.

According to the U.S. Constitution, corporations are afforded the same rights as people, and therefore should be given the same protections as individuals when it comes to political donations. This decision, by correlation, asserted that the spending of money equates to the exercise of our First Amendment rights to free speech. While the Supreme Court’s decision may be true to the letter of U.S. law, it raised a widespread concern amongst Americans as to whether corporations should, in fact and practice, be afforded the same rights as people, and whether the spending of money constituted free speech.

[vsw id=”xQqzhjstb7E” source=”youtube” width=”550″ height=”400″ autoplay=”no”]

Just this week, the Supreme Court dealt another blow to campaign finance reform advocates in the McCutcheon v. FEC ruling. In essence, the decision did not affect federal campaign finance laws, save for one small factor. Prior to the decision, individuals and PACs were forced to abide by a hard-and-fast limit on aggregated donations to political candidates or PACs in support or opposition to particular legislation or candidates.

Let’s look at it this way.

Prior to the McCutcheon decision, there was a limit as to what I could donate to any and all political campaigns within an election cycle. That cap was $123,200. I could spend that total in any way I saw fit, as long as  I abided by current FEC guidelines of  $2,600 per federal candidate in each primary and general election or $32,400 per PAC in each cycle.

While the Supreme Court’s decision did not eliminate the $2,600 or $32,400 guidelines, it did declare the cap of $123,200 unconstitutional. This means I can donate $2,600 to any candidate in any state, and $32,400 to any PAC in any state, without restrictions, up to infinity dollars.

If I had the money to do this, I would, but therein lies the rub.

I don’t.

You don’t.

98 percent of the people in the U.S. don’t.

The McCutcheon decision has basically told big time donors that they can start buying candidates and PACs throughout the country, and in turn buy legislative influence.

Unfortunately, the U.S. Supreme Court has rightly ruled in both of these cases. As they stand, the only way to rescind these decisions is to amend the U.S. Constitution to say plainly that corporations are not people, and spending money is not free speech. This is where the nationwide movement to amend the U.S. Constitution comes into play.

Amending the U.S. Constitution is no small task. 38 of the 50 states must ratify an amendment. Our first step in Rhode Island is to amend our own constitution. As it stands, the Rhode Island chapter of the Move(ment) to Amend has bills before both the R.I. Senate and House. On their face, these bills do nothing, but when combined with bills in other states, we send a loud and clear message to the U.S. Supreme Court, and our legislators in Washington.

CORPORATIONS ARE NOT PEOPLE.

SPENDING MONEY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE FREE SPEECH.

Please, for the sake of our country, and our children and grandchildren, sign the petition to amend our Constitution today.

Krystle Martin: Another single mom union organizer fired by Hilton Providence


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Krystle Martin 01Krystle Martin is the third leader of the unionization effort at the Hilton Providence to lose her job.

Last week Bob Plain ran a piece detailing how two leaders of the unionization effort at the Hilton Providence had lost their jobs. Now that number is three. I previously profiled Adrienne Jones here, and covered Friday’s union action here. This is Krystle Martin’s story.

Martin is funny and optimistic, with an easy smile and a quick wit. She comes from a family with a strong union and military background. Her grandmother was in the Telephone Workers Union and her father was in the Laborers Union. She’s a hard working single mom, part of the blue collar, working class that builds, protects and maintains this country. I seriously doubt that many people reading this would want to switch places with Martin, swapping the challenges of their lives for hers. She lives every day on the edge of extreme poverty, where a missed paycheck or a missed day of work can mean the difference between eating or not eating, sleeping in your home or being homeless.

Martin was first hired to work at the Hilton Providence Starbucks, but after a few weeks she was offered the chance to be a server in Shula’s 347 Grill, the restaurant above the Starbucks. For those unfamiliar with food service, this move offers the potential of a big increase in pay. Though being a barista at Starbucks can pay a few dollars more than minimum wage, working as a server in a nice restaurant can bring in much more money in tips, even though you might make less than $5 an hour without tips. Martin needed this opportunity because she was pregnant, and needed the money.

Instead of working as a server, however, after training Martin was given the task of delivering room service, bussing tables (which requires carrying between 35 and 45 pounds of dishes from the table to the dishwasher in back) and expediting orders. (Expediting is adding the final touches to a meal, such as garnishes, and grouping the meals together to be delivered to the guests.) Needless to say, the tips for these duties were not what Martin expected.

Lifting heavy bussing trays full of dishes is not an optimal job for a woman over six months pregnant, but when Martin objected she says, “I received sarcasm from management when I presented a doctors note that stated I couldn’t lift more than 15 pounds.”

After presenting the note, Martin says was approached by a fellow server holding a bucket of clean dishes.

“Can you hold this for me, Krystle?” asked her coworker.

Martin took the bucket of dishes, not sure exactly what was going on, but she was beginning to suspect.

“That’s fifteen pounds of dishes,” said her coworker, “that’s what we expect you to carry.”

Martin asked for light duty, but was denied. She went into preterm labor twice, at 26 and 34  weeks, but still the hotel would not accommodate her. Customers would stop Martin on the floor of the restaurant and ask her if she was okay being so visibly pregnant and bussing tables. Martin just smiled and shrugged it off. She needed the job and needed the money: complaining to customers was not going to help her keep her job. Keep in mind that these are often long shifts of 12 and 13 hours, and breaks were rare, never mind the fact that they are required by law.

Finally, perhaps reacting to the concerns of customers or perhaps having finally found some sense of decency, management deigned to put Martin on light duty which consisted of hostessing and what Martin calls “light” bussing. Light duty lasted for three shifts, because Martin went into labor 11 days early, and delivered a healthy baby girl.

A single mother, Martin could not afford to miss work. Also, the Hilton told her that she might not have a job if she came back to work in six weeks. So less than 48 hours after leaving the hospital where she gave birth, Martin was back to work at the Hilton Providence Starbucks. Here she ran into new problems.

“Before I gave birth and before I returned to work, I’d stated my intent to breast feed my daughter, and upon my return to work, I immediately stated that I was breast feeding my daughter and would need time to pump milk during my shift.”

Working 12 and 13 hour shifts, Martin never got more than two chances (15 minute breaks) per day to pump her breast milk, and despite the law saying that she should be given a secure and designated area for the purpose, she was forced to pump her breast milk in the restroom of the coffee shop, “so that I wouldn’t be too far away from the store at the time.”

This is when serious talk of forming a union started to percolate among the hotel staff. According to Martin, “Management reprimanded us when we spoke out about mistreatment within our departments, inadequate working conditions, labor issues, unfair/illegal labor practices, tip theft and discrimination.”

Searching for a second job to supplement her income was also a difficult option.  Martin says was told that if she secured a second job she would have to tell the hotel management so that they could cut her hours.

“I told management that I was not going to tell them if I did get another job or not, because it was none of their business. I said that whatever I do with my time, while off the clock, and away from the Hilton is my personal life. It is my personal business, and it is not their concern. Management insisted that I was required to tell them if I got another job, because they didn’t want me working so much and intended on cutting my hours if I did.”

Of course, if the hotel paid decent wages and treated its employees with respect and dignity, workers like Martin might not need a second job.

On February 17 of this year, Martin says she was interrogated by her department manager, regarding “signatures.” It was obvious that management knew she was a member and leader of a union committee and was out collecting signatures from her coworkers with the intent of forming a union. The next day Martin says she was told by Hilton Providence Human Resources Manager Amanda Robataille that she was being suspended, pending termination. Martin says that Robataille had returned to work in early January after taking six weeks off for maternity leave.

Martin was suspended just four hours before the hotel worker’s first public action: the attempt to deliver a petition to the hotel management declaring the worker’s intent to form a union. Though delivery of the petition was rebuffed by Hilton management, a union was formed that day. Now the pressure needs to stay on The Procaccianti Group, the company that owns the Hilton, so that the union can be recognized and contract negotiations begun.

After the union action Martin was reinstated in her job, only to be suspended again a week later. As she awaits a decision as to whether or not this suspension is permanent, Martin has learned that the Hilton Providence has already run a job listing searching for her replacement. Effectively, she’s been fired.

“I am tired of not being able to afford both child care and rent, even though I work more than 30 hours a week,” said Martin. “Most of the days I work, I am working shifts in excess of 12 hours, without being able to take a break, because there aren’t enough employees on shift for me to be able to do so. I don’t receive welfare, housing assistance, WIC, or section 8. I live in a building that is contaminated with lead paint, but I am being told by other landlords and realtors that because I don’t have enough verifiable income, I’m unable to move into a new place. Because I don’t have a realistic and livable wage, I cannot afford to live in a healthy home, which my daughter, myself, and every other human being in the United States is entitled to.

“I am fighting for fairness and respect. I am fighting for the recognition of the hard work that workers do on a daily basis. I am fighting for fair wages, so that my coworkers and I can afford to provide for our families. More importantly, I am fighting to be allowed the ability to be the mother that my daughter needs and deserves.”

Workers demand human rights at Hilton Providence


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

DSC_9785The first thing I noticed as I approached the Hilton Providence on Friday evening was the rented U-Haul truck parked conspicuously between the sidewalk where unionizing workers were staging their protest and the main entrance to the hotel.

The truck, placed so as to spare hotel management and guests the sight of underpaid and overworked employees advocating for fair wages and treatment, became a source of amusement and jokes among the protesters. When a gigantic 18-wheeler rumbled by emblazoned with a large “Teamsters” logo, chants of “We’ve got a bigger truck!” began, followed by laughter.

To highlight the abuse of workers rights alleged to take place at the hotel by the workers on the picket line, the protesters held a mock funeral for the United States Constitution. The document had a good run, said the protesters, only to be murdered by the Prociaccianti Group that owns and manages the hotel. Speaking in memory of the Constitution were Adrienne Jones, interviewed here at RI Future last Monday, and Krystle Martin, whose interview will be on this sight shortly, as well as many other workers and Providence Councilperson Carmen Castillo.

Since the unionization effort began, three union leaders have lost their jobs at the Hilton Providence and eight workers have been reprimanded, according to the organizers, so the Prociaccianti Group appears to be playing union busting hardball. Two of the fired workers, the aforementioned Jones and Martin, are single moms, leading some on the picket line to assert that the Hilton is targeting single mothers, who are more vulnerable economically. It’s hard to imagine more deplorable behavior.

Forming a union is an essential human right, and whatever efforts the hotel is undertaking to squelch the union is morally indefensible. The Prociaccianti Group is already bleeding business. The Unitarian Universalist General Assembly is bringing thousands of people to the Providence area this Summer, and they are not staying at the Hilton or the Renaissance (where workers are also batting for their right to unionize)  in response to the hotel’s treatment of its workers. More groups are sure to follow.

Meanwhile, local media, including the rapidly declining Providence Journal and local TV news continue to ignore the plight of workers fighting for their rights, leaving coverage of this developing story to the Brown Daily Herald and RI Future. Stories about real human suffering and economic exploitation are beneath their notice, it seems.

DSC_9511

DSC_9516

DSC_9529

DSC_9544

DSC_9564

DSC_9585

DSC_9590

DSC_9594

DSC_9597

DSC_9601

DSC_9631

DSC_9661

DSC_9664

DSC_9666

DSC_9671

DSC_9680

DSC_9686

DSC_9704

DSC_9718

DSC_9721

DSC_9725

DSC_9734

DSC_9738

DSC_9746

DSC_9750

DSC_9758

DSC_9791

DSC_9829

DSC_9876

Not needed: crank economic opinions on the Minimum Wage


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

DSC_8172Arguments against raising the minimum wage are tedious, immoral and wrong.

Writing about the need for a substantive raise in the minimum wage to alleviate the crushing poverty of the working poor opens the floodgates to conservative and libertarian cranks who argue, against all reason and compassion, that minimum wage laws should be abolished. Tearing quotes from their dog eared copies of Rothbard and Mises, two economists who never met a real-world constraint on their precious theories that they can’t talk themselves around in an assault of dense, senseless prose, Libertarian and free-market conservatives (as if there is a real difference) barrage the Internet with drivel.

Entering into discussions with people who advance economic models over economic reality is like jumping into choppy waters to rescue a drowning victim: If you are not extremely careful you will be dragged below the waves and drowned yourself.

After I wrote a piece on this blog taking Republican gubernatorial candidates Alan Fung and Ken Block to task for opposing an increase in minimum wage, I was hit with this objection from frequent commenter “jgardner”:

The minimum wage has never been, nor will ever be, a job creator, but will always be a job destroyer.

First, I never said raising the minimum wage would directly create jobs, but I did cautiously assert that providing the working poor with more money would have the effect of stimulating the economy, because poor people spend their money. More importantly, however, is the the second contention, stated without any proof as though delivered from God to Moses: The minimum wage is a job destroyer. From this I am to then conclude that abolishing the minimum wage would create more jobs. Perhaps. But these jobs would only be paying slave wages that keep the working poor working and poor.

As explained way back in 2009 by economics professor Bill Mitchell:

The winds of change strengthened in the recent OECD Employment Outlook entitled Boosting Jobs and Incomes, which is based on a comprehensive econometric analysis of employment outcomes across 20 OECD countries between 1983 and 2003. The sample includes those who have adopted the Jobs Study as a policy template and those who have resisted labour market deregulation. The report provides an assessment of the Jobs Study strategy to date and reveals significant shifts in the OECD position. OECD (2006) finds that:

-There is no significant correlation between unemployment and employment protection legislation;

-The level of the minimum wage has no significant direct impact on unemployment; and

-Highly centralized wage bargaining significantly reduces unemployment.

Having to finally concede that there is no real world evidence for his contention and instead a wealth of evidence against his position (though in truth no concession was made, the issue was simply sidestepped), “jgardner” pulled out his trump card:

If the minimum wage could lift people out of poverty with no adverse effects for anyone, why not raise the minimum wage to $25/hr?

One might as well ask why, if one beer relaxes you, why not drink twenty-five beers. The answer is because doing that will kill you. When answering such objections, no matter how nicely you try to put things, you feel like you are talking to a petulant child: “A little of something can be good for you, but a lot of something can hurt you. That’s why you can’t eat all your Halloween candy in one night.”

Here’s a nice way to say it, from the Social Democracy blog:

There is another objection that has been going the rounds (mostly on libertarian blogs): if we make the minimum wage $9, then why not $900? That objection is, quite frankly, brainless.

The minimum wage is a floor concept: the floor is roughly the poverty line (or slightly above it). That is where you set it, and not well above it.

Not even Post Keynesians deny that excessive wage increases can feed into cost push inflation – wages being a big factor in input costs. But a rise from, say, $7.25 to $9 is quite small. In the real world, whole swathes of the market have corporations and businesses that actively set prices and control them by price administration. They leave prices unchanged for significant periods of time, even when mild to moderate demand changes happen, or even when mild price increases affect their factor input costs.

I’ve been hard on “jgardner” because he was brave enough to put his opinions out there, and I would like to believe he’s a decent person. But like so many otherwise decent people who believe terrible things because of their religion, “jgardner” seems similarly trapped by his economic beliefs. Ultimately, shouldn’t all this back and forth economic theorizing should be secondary to other, more pertinent concerns? People right now are working full time at two or more jobs and being forced to subsist below the poverty line. This situation is plainly immoral and monstrous.

Moral arguments for raising the minimum wage include lifting people and families out of poverty, paying people an honest salary for an honest days work, moving away from the economic paradigm that suggests unemployment is voluntary and that workers are “shirkers” and reducing in some small way the vast economic inequality that threatens to destabilize our democracy.

A decent society, made up of decent people, does not let unemployed people starve, it does not plunge families into homelessness and it does not encourage businesses to pay slave wages for hard work.

Economic theories that do not fit in with observations made in the real world need to be modified or discarded. Science is not a process of inventing a set of ideal rules that support pre-existing prejudices. It is a process of suggesting possible rules, and then testing them against reality through experimentation and observation. In this way Libertarian economists such as Mises and Rothbard catastrophically fail as scientists. I should add here that as bad as Libertarian economic theory is, even mainstream economics needs a scientific wake-up call. (See: “Economics needs a scientific revolution” by physicist Jean-Philippe Brouchard.)

Inviting Libertarian economic views into serious economic and political policy discussions is as useless and counterproductive as inviting the views of Trofim Lysenko into a modern genetics conference or inviting Erich von Däniken to give a talk at an ancient history seminar.

The damage done to human wellbeing by corrupt economic theory far surpasses the damage down to our society by the teaching of creationism in schools, anti-vaccination conspiracy claptrap, the anti-birth control advocacy of the Catholic Church and Islamic terrorism combined. It is time to grow up, abandon the religion of economic idealism, and start living in the real world of testable economic hypotheses and scientific economic rigor with the intention to abolish poverty once and for all.

Republicans are wrong about minimum wage and economists know it


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

DSC_8263In response to Democratic gubernatorial candidate Angel Taveras supporting a minimum wage increase in Rhode Island from its current $8 to a kingly $10.10, both Republican candidates, according to the ProJo, have opposed the idea. Ken Block is quoted as saying, “We have seen repeatedly… that Democrat-driven mandates, like increasing the minimum wage, raise the cost of doing business and ultimately lead to fewer jobs,” while Cranston Mayor Allan Fung declared, “Raising the minimum wage isn’t a solution. It’s a symptom of a larger problem.”

Are Block and Fung right when they say raising the minimum wage will have an adverse effect on Rhode Island’s already struggling economy? The short answer is no, and the truth is that economists have known this since at least 1994 when David Card and Alan Krueger published Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast-Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania.

Card and Krueger did an analysis in 1992 when New Jersey raised its minimum wage from $4.25 to $5.05. Contrary to what Ken Block seems to believe, the study found “no indication that the rise in the minimum wage reduced employment.”

As to Fung’s position that raising the minimum wage isn’t a solution, one needs to ask, “A solution to what?” If we are looking for a solution to the problem of how to keep workers poor and minimum wage employers rich, then Fung is right. However, if we are looking for a way to potentially lift hundreds of thousands of low paid workers out of poverty, then raising the minimum wage is a solution worth pursuing. A report from ROCUnited shows how this is possible.

Both Block and Fung, it seems, are content with the status quo, in which large corporations and other other businesses underpay their employees. This puts the burden of public assistance for these underpaid workers squarely on the taxpayers. Raising the minimum wage, however, does not put any additional burdens on the taxpayer, and in fact, by getting people off public assistance, tax burdens will be lowered.

To those who think that raising the minimum wage will just benefit a bunch of teenage kids working for date money or people too lazy to find real jobs, this chart, from the AFL-CIO and put together with info from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, should dispel that idea.

fMCwyRZ

Economic Freedom Index is a conservative lie


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
DB14-Figure21-21
The disposable worker

Justin Katz notes with relish a report in the Wall St Journal that places the United States for the first time out of the list of top ten economically free nations. Analyzing the data, Katz concludes that “it appears that we’re losing ground in the very areas that make it possible for families to forge their own futures” but in actual fact the Economic Freedom Index, created by the conservative think tank the Heritage Foundation (in concert with the Wall St Journal) does not measure the economic freedoms of families, but the economic freedoms of corporations and the one per centers.

For instance, when assessing labor freedom the Index factors the ratio of minimum wage to the average value added per worker, hindrance to hiring additional workers, rigidity of hours, difficulty of firing redundant employees, legally mandated notice period, and mandatory severance pay. Heritage gets this information from the International Finance Corporation (IFC). A look at the relevant IFC page shows that the factors under consideration have little to do with the rights of workers, but with the ease with which business owners may hire or terminate workers.

For the purpose of IFC measurements, and therefore for the Index so lauded by Katz, labor rights, such as the right to join trade unions or the right to collective bargaining, are irrelevant. The IFC assumes that the worker is fairly compensated, that is, the worker “earns a salary plus benefits equal to the economy’s average wage during the entire period of his employment.” Fair and equitable pay is assumed, and therefore outside the scope of the Index’s concern.

The Economic Freedom Index has been under fire before. John Miller, writing for Dollars and Sense, said the index “tells us little about economic growth or political freedom” and “is a slipshod measure that would seem to have no other purpose other than to sell the neoliberal policies that stand in the way of most people gaining control over their economic lives and obtaining genuine economic freedom in today’s global economy.” Miller, an economics teacher, has many more criticisms in his excellent piece, and is well worth reading.

The Index is naked punditry masquerading as economic analysis and undermines real efforts towards passing legislation that will help to reform the business climate and contain the ever growing power of the corporatist state. Moving up the Index rankings is as simple as rolling back legislation that restricts the ability of businesses to act as they please, while simultaneous ensuring that the “rule of law” and “property rights” are strictly enforced to the advantage of the “haves” over the “have nots.” Under such conditions, it would be all but impossible for all but a very privileged few families “to forge their own futures” as Katz put it.

The Economic Freedom Index is yet another conservative lie, a product made to generate the kind of headlines neoliberal pundits can use to beat the rest of us into submission. Crap like this is read with head nodding seriousness by legislators (and potential future governors) as a basis for legislative action, and it needs to be called out and resisted.

Labor Board sets trial date for Renaissance Hotel dispute


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Regional Director Jonathan B. Kreisberg of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) out of Boston “issued a Government complaint and notice of hearing against the Renaissance Providence Downtown Hotel and TPG Hospitality, Inc., The Procaccianti Group’s hotel management affiliate. The NLRB Complaint charges the Hotel with multiple unfair labor practices deterring workers from organizing to improve their low wage, low benefit jobs,” according to a press release on the Joey Quits blog late Friday.

The press release continues:

Representatives of the hotel workers’ union asked the Hotel to resolve the case by being neutral. The Hotel has refused. A trial before a federal labor judge is scheduled for March 31, 2014 in the NLRB’s Boston office.

The Government complaint names thirteen different managers, including Elizabeth Procaccianti and Hotel General Manager Angelo DePeri.  The NLRB Complaint alleges multiple acts of interfering with, restraining and coercing employee organizing rights, including interrogation and illegal promises of benefits to induce workers to abandon union organizing. The NLRB Complaint cites The Procaccianti Group’s TPG Hospitality affiliate for maintaining illegal work rules nationwide, including rules restricting communications and prohibiting employees from speaking to the media and the public about their jobs.

This NLRB Complaint comes after OSHA cited the Hotel in October 2013.  The Hotel ultimately settled with OSHA by agreeing to correct the workplace hazards and paying $8,000 in fines.

Julian Bello, a houseman at the Renaissance, said: “This is now the second time the Federal government is citing the Hotel for violating our rights.  Why does it think it is above the law?”

Citing the Hotel’s coercive anti-union campaign, sweatshop workloads and sub-living wages, the workers called for a boycott of the Hotel on December 4, 2013.  While the law gives Hotel managers the right to force workers into mandatory anti-union meetings, the law does not force the public to patronize their Hotel.

The Unitarian Universalist Association (UUA) has already canceled over 800 rooms they had reserved for their General Assembly convention, to be held in Providence in June 2014. Jan Sneegas, the UUA’s director of General Assembly and Conference Services, said, “The Unitarian Universalist Association is strongly committed to the fair treatment and equity of all employees in the workplace. When a labor dispute arises, it is our policy to review our contract with that company.  In this instance, the UUA decided to terminate the contract.”

Renaissance workers currently make significantly lower wages and benefits than their counterparts in union hotels like the Omni Providence Hotel. The Procaccianti Group, has owned, developed or managed over 100 hotels nationwide and claims real estate assets exceeding $5 billion nationwide.


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387