Ravitch responds to ProJo


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

diane ravitchThe Providence Journal published a highly misleading op/ed by Deborah Gist, that was discredited here, here, here and here (among some examples). So naturally, ProJo’s Politifact team responded by fact checking Gist’s biggest and most well-known critic, Diane Ravitch.

Politifact wrote: “Education critic Diane Ravitch said, ‘Test scores had gone up steadily for 40 years until No Child Left Behind and Race to the Top.’ There are a few problems with her statement. First, the time spans for the scores she cites are 32 and 38 years, not 40. Second, while the scores increased overall, there were a few dips. And for 17-year-olds, the overall increases were insignificant. Finally, despite her implication that the increases stopped after No Child Left Behind, scores actually rose for all age groups in 2008 and for nearly all in 2012, the next two testing periods.”

Ravitch, a blogger, wrote a lengthy response today saying that Politifact “misinterpreted what I said or misunderstood what I wrote.”

I contend in the book that test scores on the National Assessment of Educational Progress are at a historic high point for white students, black students, Hispanic students, and Asian students. Nothing in his article disputes those facts. It seems that his goal is to defend the high-stakes testing and accountability regime created by George W. Bush’s No Child Left Behind law, passed in 2001 and signed into law in 2002.

You can read the whole thing here.

 

Why red states love voter ID


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Voter-ID-4A North Carolina Republican, who declines to distance himself from racism, admits that voter ID laws are designed to give Republicans an electoral advantage. Which, I suppose makes some strategic sense for a Republican-leaning state with a recent history of racism like North Carolina. But why does Rhode Island have a voter ID law?

Watch the not-funny-because-it’s-true Daily Show segment here, in which Aasif Mandvi suggests Democrats level the playing field by suppressing Republican turnout with, among other ploys, “Jesus didn’t vote” bumper stickers.

The segment also features Civil Rights hero and Georgia Congressman John Lewis who will be in Rhode Island later this week for the Providence NAACP’s 100th Annual Freedom Fund Awards Dinner.

This Daily Show segment on voter repression is pretty good too:

Patch editor gets TV invite, declines because he was laid off


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

patchWhat a wild week local journalist Joe Hutnak just had.

The Patch reporter filed top notch coverage of the Woonsocket Democratic mayoral primary last week and was invited to appear on WPRI Newsmakers to discuss his excellent effort. Ted Nesi called his story “the best analysis I saw of what Baldelli-Hunt did right.”

But Patch didn’t let Hutnak appear on WPRI’s popular Sunday politics show. “The day after we invited Joe,” Nesi told me, “I got a call from someone higher up at Patch saying he wouldn’t be allowed to join us on TV due to the ‘current circumstances’ there.”

The circumstances were that Hutnak had already been laid off. His last day was Tuesday but he had known since August, when company-wide cuts were announced, that his position would be eliminated by mid-October.

Hutnak was one of the original Patch employees in Rhode Island and served as the editor of Johnston Patch for much of his tenure with the company. Johnston and Smithfield Patch sites have become zombie sites. Zombie sites, what Patch is calling “unstaffed sites” don’t have dedicated editorial resources and are populated with non-local stories.

Here’s how the former editor of Watsonville (Calif) Patch, described the new incarnation of the site she launched in 2010:

Restructuring at Patch eliminated my position. It will also change how Watsonville Patch is managed going forward.

Let me be clear: Patch is not closing. In fact, none of the local Patch sites will go dark. But Watsonvlle Patch will no longer get as much local attention from an editor.

What does that mean? We’re giving you the site.Watsonville Patch is now your free, hyperlocal community forum. Write blogs. Post your events and share announcements. (Just please be nice to each other.)

Now that Hutnak doesn’t work for Patch anymore, he can make his own decision about appearing on TV. And now that he doesn’t work for Patch anymore, Nesi and Newsmakers may want to interview him about that, too. Hutnak might not want to answer too many questions about the his former employer, as here’s what a former Patch employee told Romenesko about the severance offer for those who were formally laid off yesterday.

Make it to Oct. 15 and the employee gets 2 mos severance. They can receive an additional 2 weeks pay if they agree to sign a separation agreement and forgo certain rights that are as yet undefined.

Rachel Maddow: my ‘political crush’ is Sheldon


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

RachelMaddowShowLocal liberals share Rachel Maddow’s infatuation.

The extremely popular and progressive MSNBC host, told the Bravo network this week that she’s kinda got the hots for Rhode Island’s junior senator and the undisputed leader of the unofficial lefty caucus here in the Ocean State.

At the 5:00 minute mark, a caller asks Maddow “what politician’s creativity and courage gives you hope…?” She takes it one step further.

“I am going to tell you my secret politician crush which I’ve never talked about publicly before, Sheldon Whitehouse,” she said. “There are actually a few senators who I think are pretty impressive guys. Sheldon Whitehouse because nobody knows who he is and he is always sort of quietly plotting along doing the right thing, being smart, thinking big thoughts while everyone else is thinking partisan thoughts. I have a little crush on him. He won’t come on my show. This won’t help.”

Whitehouse responded via Twitter yesterday.

It’s high time Rachel Maddow got something right about Rhode Island. Previously, she’s misled her viewers into thinking we have a left-leaning legislature by assuming the Democratically-controlled General Assembly would support a gun control bill. As Sam Bell, chair of the Rhode Island Progressive Democrats, pointed out in the this post, MSNBC seems not to understand that many a local Dem falls far to the right of the object of Maddow’s affection. And despite her assumption, the bill died in committee. The Progressive Dems have been a leader in calling attention to this issue and filed a campaign finance complaint against the NRA, as reported by the Providence Journal. Maddow, on the other hand, is telling the rest of America that Rhode Island Democrats are winning the war against gun violence.

No wonder she thinks Sheldon is flying under the radar. Whitehouse been a leading voice in Congress on campaign finance and climate change – next to war, these are the two biggest dilemmas facing the nation in the 21st century. He’s even been mention as a possible Supreme Court nominee. Sheldon’s about as unknown as our local legislators are anti-NRA!

When Sheldon appears on her show – and here’s hoping this happens real soon – he should bring a map and see if Maddow can find us on it.

Renn: ‘Innuendo not evidence’ for me but not for thee


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

renn’ll admit it. I love Urbanophile blogger Aaron Renn. He never fails to entertain and often makes some good points. But his hit job on Rolling Stone writer Matt Taibbi was profoundly deceptive.

If you clicked on the link or pay close attention to the local news cycle, you probably know I wrote my lede in a way to tease Renn. (Welcome to RI, Aaron!) But also to prove a point. My lede is virtually identical to the lede Wrenn wrote when he tried to discredit Taibbi’s blockbuster Rolling Stone article in GoLocalProv yesterday, I just switched Taibbi for Renn and Raimondo for Taibbi! Now, I will systematically discredit Renn’s reasoning in the same way he tried to do to Taibbi’s.

But before I do, like Renn, I will disclose that I too have worked for an entity with a profound stake in pension politics. While Renn has done some freelance work for the Manhattan Institute and I’ve done some work for the union-backed cable access show Labor Vision and organized labor sometimes (though not as often as it should!) advertises with RI Future. If you think my previous relationships somehow matter more than Renn’s, then either you are trying to influence politics yourself – as me and Renn are clearly doing! – or I would like to invite you to invest in the hedge fund I am starting later this afternoon (full disclosure, you may lose your money)

Here goes:

  • Renn says Taibbi blames Wall Street for Rhode Island pension cuts and lets Dems off the hook, including Providence Mayor Angel Taveras because he never worked on Wall Street.As a factual matter, this is not why Mayor Taveras does not reap the same treatment as does Raimondo. It’s well-known that Taveras cut pensions by sitting down and negotiating with labor while Raimondo fist-pumped at rallies and pushed through severe cuts that union leaders vociferously and publicly opposed. He’s just wrong on this point.As far as blaming Wall Street rather than Rhode Island Democrats. Yes, local liberals deserve much fault, and I would love to see a Rolling Stone article or MSNBC segment about how often Ocean State Democrats side with Wall Street interests over local retirees. (I believe we are still the only state in the nation to have a law that guarantees bondholders get paid before retirees.) But again Renn is wrong when he asserts that Taibbi says Wall Street and/or its shibboleths are “responsible” for pension cuts in Rhode Island. Rather Taibbi says they helped fund a campaign to do so and that they benefited from it.
  • “Where’s the evidence,” writes Renn. Taibbi “only makes two actual attempts to link Raimondo to a hedge fund plot.” There it is, the evidence! Oh wait, only two pieces of evidence. Nevermind. Does journalism critical of Wall Street require at least three? Or just at least one more than the author can dig up?What’s even more rich is that Renn does absolutely nothing to discredit the evidence!!First, he offers the ridiculous false equivalent of noting that labor supported Raimondo too, so they must be in on the scam as well. I don’t believe Renn believes that. Labor bet that Raimndo could do less damage to their interests than Kerry King – a bet they lost in spectacular fashion, I might add. I’m sure most union members wish they backed Tom Sgouros rather than Raimondo to run for treasurer. Wall Street, on the other hand, I would guess is pretty happy with how it worked out.Secondly, he says Taibbi’s evidence falls flat because he “quotes a third party.” Not only is quoting a third party more commonly referred to as “sourcing” information in the act of journalism, but Renn doesn’t even try to discredit Taibbi’s source.
  • Renn’s big picture isn’t all that big. In fact, it read like what one might call “innuendo, not evidence.””Taibbi seems to think if the government is spending money on anything he doesn’t like, from hedge fund fees to the bone-headed state investment in video game company 38 Studios, then the state cut the pensions specifically to fund those bogus expenditures,” he wrote.
  • My favorite part is when claims that smaller risks are illogical. Vegas should hire Renn as a consultant for roulette players. Though maybe the Manhattan Institute pays better to convince taxpayers to bet big on Wall Street.

MSNBC doesn’t understand Rhode Island


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

photo id lawMSNBC does some great reporting.  But when it comes to Rhode Island, America’s left-leaning news channel is missing a good scoop.

For example: Last night, All In with Chris Hayes (incidentally, a fantastic show) displayed a map showing the states that with photo ID laws in effect and the states where laws are going into effect in upcoming elections. Rhode Island was missing.  We should have been on the list of states with photo ID beginning in future elections.

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Hayes attributes the information to the National Conference of State Legislatures, but the NCSL confirms what we already know–the photo ID portion of the Ocean State’s voter ID law phases in in 2014.

According to legislative spokesman LarryBerman, the 2012 non-photo voter ID rules will apply in Woonsocket’s November election, but the 2014 election will require a photo ID unless the General Assembly repeals the law during the 2014 session.  

To be honest, I have a lot of sympathy for Hayes and his team.  In the midst of working flat out to deliver some truly stunning reporting on the government shutdown, I can understand how All In might not think to check whether a deep blue state like Rhode Island would have passed such a Republican law.

Also understandable is Rachel Maddow’s April segment on gun control in Rhode Island:

Nine bills that include a ban on assault weapons and high capacity magazines and improving the reporting of mental health information to the state’s background check systems. It’s fairly comprehensive package, these nine bills.

Now, in terms of whether or not this fifth state is likely to pass the legislation they’re considering, it may helpful (sic) to consider the partisan background of what the legislature looks like in Rhode Island.

Yes, do not adjust your television sets. It really is that lopsided.  There are eight Republicans for the 29 Democrats in the state Senate. And there are six Republicans for the 69 Democrats in the statehouse. Wow.

Rhode Island will have a debate over these measures and some may be changed by virtue of the debate, but this partisan breakdown in the state means these measures will likely pass.

Maddow’s bold prediction was wrong.  The bills failed spectacularly.  The assault weapons ban and even the patch that would have closed a loophole that helps minors access guns never even got a vote.  The only bills that moved were two token bills to increase penalties for having a stolen gun or a gun with the serial numbers shaved off and a third to set up a study commission.  As tea party Rep Doreen Costa (R-North Kingstown) said in her floor speech on the bills that did move, “we’re all really happy.”

Maddow’s prediction was not so absurd.  In any other state, she would have been completely correct.  But not in Rhode Island, where the Speaker of the House, the President of the Senate, the House Majority Leader, and the Senate Majority Leader–all Democrats–have each taken thousands of dollars from the NRA.  And I believe those contributions were illegal.  (The Board of Elections is still deliberating on my complaint.)  As Doreen Costa put it, Speaker Gordon Fox (D-Providence) was “very, very kind to us gun folks.”

See Costa’s speech here:

I should note that there are two small errors in Maddow’s piece.  Her party numbers for the Senate seem to be the old breakdown from before the 2012 election, with the one Independent left out for some reason.  The second error had to do with the package itself.  There was no bill to fix mental health information reporting in the package.  Instead, there was a bill to set up a committee to think about maybe putting in a bill to do the reporting.  It’s a pretty important difference.

I hope MSNBC will issue a correction.  But what I really want is for them to cover the real story, the story of right-wingers taking over the Rhode Island Democratic Party.

ProJo reports on anti-union narrative that doesn’t exist


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

organize“Union effort may face fight,” declares the headline on the front page of this morning’s Providence Journal. “Stage is set for vote by childcare workers across R.I., as foes prepare legal arguments.”

The story then begins: “Amid objections from the National Right to Work Foundation, the Chafee administration has signed an agreement that sets the stage for a vote within the next two months on the drive to unionize upward of 580 private contractors who provide state-subsidized childcare in their homes.”

Wow, the opposition was cited three times on the front page, there must be some serious conflict with these 600 low-wage workers organizing for better wages. Let’s go to the jump page (you know, the one that typically has ads paid for by big box stores) to see what the controversy is all about.

Oh, here it is:

In a related development, a local research group made public an opinion letter from a lawyer associated with the National Right to Work Foundation, which has taken the lead in challenging the unionization of childcare workers elsewhere in the country.

“Nothing imminent, but we are keeping an eye on Rhode Island,’’ said foundation spokesman Anthony Riedel in an interview earlier this week.

And I’m sure they’ll be in touch with the Providence Journal if and when anything comes to mind; and that the ProJo will in turn let us know what author of said opinion letter thinks. Worth noting, I think that the newspaper’s rhetoric is more fiery than the advocacy group’s.

But wait, there’s more. Former pro athlete and union member Mike Stenhouse also sent an email. He says he’s not considering legal action but he is considering contacting the soon-to-be-organized employees to let them know he thinks this is a bad idea for them, and that their free speech is being limited.

I hope, for the ProJo’s sake, that it didn’t have to stop the presses to squeeze in that scoop. Because after all, the guys who operate the machinery are all in unions and they get paid whether that critical bit of information gets delivered to news-reading Rhode Island in a timely fashion or not.

The ProJo opinion: Stop saying things we don’t want to hear


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

ProjoI get that the Providence Journal editorial board (read: Ed Achorn) really doesn’t like union workers, and feels very strongly that public sector retirees should bare the brunt of elected officials’ overly-optimistic and/or irresponsible plan for dealing with future employee expenses, but I think that calling for a judge to chide the governor for speaking to the media is more than a little bit of an extreme reaction from Rhode Island’s paper of record.

“On Latino Public Radio Saturday, Governor Chafee brazenly ignored a judge’s gag order, imposed for the benefit of all parties,” read this morning’s editorial.

As journalists first, Achorn, et al should be more weary of siding with secrecy, even when it suits their special interest. But that’s their prerogative as chief ProJo philosophers. It’s a journalism high crime, however, for their editorials to so pervasively misrepresent reality for what read like cheap political pot shots. For example, does anyone believe the Journal when it writes that Chafee leaked this “brazenly?” I suspect “accidentally” or “clumsily” might be more accurate adverbs.

More importantly, today’s editorial misstated the situation it was ostensibly explaining. The governor “publicly pitched his hopes to ‘make the unions happy’ with concessions that he asserts will not cost taxpayers too much money,” according to the piece.

Well, not exactly. Or, more precisely, not at all. What Chafee actually said, according to the Providence Journal, was, “There might be some room for something that won’t cost the taxpayers a whole lot of money but will make the unions happy.”

One has to wonder if the Projo takes issue with the statement or the sentiment. I so highly doubt there would have been a similar opinion offered from the Providence Journal if Gina Raimondo said there was a potential solution that was going to make George Nee and Bob Walsh really sad.

The editorial then asks the judge to give the governor a little talking to for the breach, and cautions Chafee about his legacy. I’d be concerned if I were Governor Chafee, too. After all, the so-called paper of record is saying things about him that aren’t true.

Television, internet, radio up as main news sources


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

The Pew Research Center for the People and the Press Main Source for Newsreleased the chart at right detailing the main sources people get their news from, as part of a larger overview of American attitudes towards news and journalism. As you can see, though both T.V. and newspapers are down from 2001, television has started to swing back up, while newspapers continue to crater. Both the Internet and radio are above where they were in 2001.

In response to the popularity of televisions and the Internet, Ted Nesi, of WPRI, posed this idea on Twitter: “TV and Internet arguably have more in common as media (info via screens!) than papers & Internet.

It caused me to pause and reflect about the barrier to use for each of these four sources of news. I think the commonality all three of the rising news sources (television, the Internet, radio) is that you can get them regardless of whether you want to get them for news, and it never has to be a conscious decision.

Virtually every audio system you can buy comes with a radio, they appear in your car, and prior to the rise of MP3 players, radios were installed on every portable audio device. You can listen to music on a radio or fill your ears with news.

Television isn’t as readily available as the other two, but it’s still virtually everywhere, from bars and restaurants to your home. And it’s easy to switch from reality television, to (more) scripted entertainment, to music, to news. Even within a single channel there can be a diverse range of programming.

The Internet is sort of like television and radio in that it tends to have specialized sources for specific genres, but those genres include everything you could ever want. You want to see a dog riding a skateboard? Check. Read up on what that guy you met in college like one time is doing in Malaysia now? Check. No other medium comes close to the diversity and range of the Internet, your all-in-one stop for everything there is under the sun (and everything that avoids direct sunlight as well). Furthermore, the Internet is now virtually everywhere, thanks to smartphones and wi-fi.

And now this brings us to the poor plight of the newspaper. Here’s the thing, newspapers have to be a major network, and in print, and at least a day behind everything else. Furthermore, unlike television, radio, and the Internet where you can just stumble across news, newspapers don’t have that advantage. Few people just “stumble” across a newspaper (well, maybe the Phoenix). You tend to have to make a conscious decision to go get a newspaper, whether its from your front step or the box. And though they often contain sections related to entertainment, culture, lifestyle, etc.; their name says it all. They’re a “newspaper” and its primary purpose is to deliver news to you.

The point here is not to disparage newspapers. It’s to point out that by their very design, newspapers are disadvantaged in simply getting to their consumer in a way other mediums aren’t. Until the Internet became widely available and used, newspapers were doing just fine. Now, their place in the media landscape is shifting so rapidly that their very future no longer seems assured. That said, despite these disadvantages, they have managed to continue beating radio, which of all media has the lowest cost barrier for consumers.

John DePetro hypes a “miracle” in N. Providence


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Mary in North Providence 01
Mary?

A piece by Ethan Shorey on the Valley Breeze website this morning provided radio shock jock John DePetro a full three hours of material.

According to Shorey, “Brian Trambowicz was driving by the Church of the Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary one day this summer when he says that Mary, the mother of Jesus, presented herself to him.”

DePetro, who is now apparently the arbiter of what constitutes a miracle, claims to completely believe that Mary has appeared in North Providence, and spent Friday morning directing people to the church. The weather worked against him, as the pouring rain kept people in their cars or under umbrellas as they strained their eyes trying to see the figure of Mary in what appears to be some sort of stain on the cross itself.

Of course, DePetro used this suspect apparition to go after some of his favorite targets, like Governor Lincoln Chafee, the liberal secular media and prominent local atheists who I won’t bother to name.

I arrived on site and took some pictures and talked to the very nice people who came out in the rain for a glimpse of something transcendent. Some people were very impressed, others seem to be trying to convince themselves that they should be impressed, and still others seemed mostly confused by the thing. To me this all had the feel of the familiar, because I was at another Marian apparition in 2003 at Milton Hospital in Milton, Massachusetts and this event felt similar in many ways.

Many people are unprepared for how slight and unimpressive apparitions are. In the Valley Breeze it was reported that “Trambowicz said the image of Mary “jumped out” at him as he was passing the church and praying, as is often his habit. The image looked like it was just inches from his face, he said.” Perhaps this was Trambowicz’s experience, but the actual cross bearing the image is distant, hard to see, and dark.

At gatherings like this people help each other to see the image, the way people might try to help each other see the shapes in one of those computer generated “Magic Eye” images or the full effect of an optical illusion. Related to this is a second process that happens at these events: people staring intently start seeing other images and other sights.

More than once I heard people say that it looked like Mary was holding the baby Jesus, or rosary beads, or that her head was slowly turning. One man on the DePetro show claimed to see three other images on the cross beam, these were the children of Fatima, said the caller, referring to a Church sanctioned miracle from 1917.

Of course, what we are truly seeing in this cross is the same thing that lets us see animals in clouds or faces in rock formations. This is pareidolia, “a psychological phenomenon involving a vague and random stimulus (often an image or sound) being perceived as significant.” When we add our natural inclination towards pareidolia with our need to see what we want to see, the effect can be quite compelling.

Knowing all this would not necessarily stop the faithful from seeing and believing, nor does it stop unscrupulous radio show trolls like DePetro from trying to turn this odd little story into a second Lourdes. All morning DePetro pathetically coached his listeners as to what they should be seeing, and outright doubted the religious faith of anyone who expressed the slightest doubt. He was encouraging mobs of people to stand outside a church on a rainy day and look up into the sky, and people did (including me, of course.)

Later in the show DePetro had to lay off a little, because of a funeral planned at the church for 11am. Traffic is always bad on Mineral Spring Avenue, and cars were slowing down as people craned their necks to see what they could see (which from a moving car isn’t much. How could Trambowicz have seen this if he was “driving by” as he claims?) The funeral was going to have a hard time navigating from the service to the gravesite if the crowd continued to swell.

One other thing that happens at such apparitions is that people wonder exactly why Mary might be appearing. In Milton observers were convinced that it was about abortion, because she appeared at a hospital. In Rhode Island, she appeared at a church that bears her name, on its 100th anniversary. Is she here for the birthday party? Or perhaps she appeared to chastise Mayor Charles Lombardi, or Governor Lincoln Chafee, because of their supposedly wicked, secular ways. Contrary to this, there are the conspiracy theories. Isn’t it a coincidence, said someone, that it happened on the church’s anniversary? Couldn’t this be faked somehow by church officials?

Meanwhile, even as DePetro pushed hard to validate this less than impressive and rapidly vanishing miracle, he still rails against immigrants and social justice and works for a station that gleefully accepts advertising from a high interest loan company preying on poverty. He still stands silent and accused in a pending sexual misconduct case and his ugly views on race, class, women and LGBTQ people continue to pollute the airwaves and the Internet.

What better defender of the faith could the public wish for?

Of course the truth is, as the picture that accompanies this piece shows, that the image on the cross doesn’t look that much like anything, never mind the mother of God. A close look reveals it to be some sort of stain which from far away, with vision blurred, might look like a veiled woman holding something, but up close the vision falls apart.

And so it is with all miracles. The closer you look, the less impressive they are.

As for the people who stand out in the rain staring into the sky seeking a hint of the divine, they unfortunately too often end up much like John DePetro: All wet.

 

 DSC_7311
DSC_7312
DSC_7313
DSC_7319
DSC_7325
DSC_7326
DSC_7327
DSC_7328
DSC_7331a
DSC_7331b
DSC_7333
DSC_7336
DSC_7337
DSC_7338
DSC_7339
DSC_7342
DSC_7343
DSC_7344
DSC_7346
DSC_7350
DSC_7351
DSC_7352
DSC_7355

ProJo changes it’s mind on child care benefits


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

child careRhode Island gets a good glimpse of how the Providence Journal editorial page may change now that Ed Achorn has assumed the helm.

This morning’s piece about a bill that would let child care workers bargain collectively with existing public sector unions carried the headline: “Another R.I. fiasco.”  This is a stark contrast to the paper of record’s May 6 editorial on the similar subject that was headlined “Early childhood potential.”

The headline isn’t the only difference in the two pieces. The more recent piece is just anti-organized labor hyperbole while the one from May 6 was a measured endorsement of the concept.

Today’s op/ed suggests, in the first sentence, that people who support this legislation don’t love the Ocean State.  The May 6 editorial had a very different opening: “For several years, Rhode Island Kids Count has provided invaluable data on the state’s children.”

Hyperbole is one thing. Misinformation is something else entirely. “It can only make government more costly and intrusive, fueling the flight of the state’s educated people in their prime earning years,” according to the Providence Journal as of today.

But actual economic analysis shows there is likely to be much economic benefit. This 2003 study funded by the Greater Providence Chamber of Commerce states: “for every public and private dollar spent on regulated child care, $1.75 is returned to the Rhode Island economy – a net positive return that almost doubles investments.”

It’s well worth noting that the SEIU crafted a more intellectually honest argument for the bill than today’s Projo op/ed did to oppose it. Watch this video:

But if the ProJo editorial board needed any evidence whatsoever that this bill can do more than simply spend money it didn’t have to look any farther than its own archives. Ostensibly, it was even written – or at the very least read – by the very same group of thinker/writers, minus the recently retired Bob Whitcomb.

The video pretty much communicates what the paper of record believed last month when it wrote, “…Rhode Island’s child-care workers could use an upgrade. Most earn fairly low pay, making it difficult to further their education.”

The Journal can both believe and publish what it wishes, and a center right editorial page may even benefit a center left constituency. But progressive viewpoints are not only largely absent from the paper of record’s editorial voice, they are often misrepresented. That may benefit my business model, but it isn’t very good for Rhode Island news consumers.

This post has been updated to fix an error. The post originally said the first editorial endorsed the bill. It did not.

Journalist Michael Hastings Dead at 33


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

MichaelHastingsIt seems to be antithetical to his life to compare journalist Michael Hastings to General George Patton, but they both worked extensively in war zones, and both met their ends in automobile accidents. Hastings is most famous for publishing a report in Rolling Stone magazine that brought down General Stanley McChrystal, then commander of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan. Hastings was also a journalist who critically examined U.S. foreign policy, the U.S. military, and the media’s relation to power. His take down of COIN (counterinsurgency) in his book The Operators is among the most important pieces of writing about military policy I’ve ever read, and gets to the heart of the hubris in thinking one can defeat an insurgency with military operations.

It was a privilege for me to be able to sit and watch a 2012 Netroots Nation panel on “progressive security policy” which featured Hastings, Ali Gharib, Kristin Lord, and Tom Perriello (Mother Jones’ Adam Weinstein moderated). Alone among the panelists, Hastings pushed backed on the idea of the existence of a progressive security policy. In the wake of confirmation of the NSA wiretapping program, the way drones have come to the front and center in recent months, and as we debate the policy of intervention into Syria, the loss of Michael Hastings will seriously handicap our ability to have an expansive conversation about U.S. national security. Progressives critical of overreaching foreign policy and the national security state will no longer have Hastings’ brilliant journalism to help broaden their ideas.

Rolling Stone obit

BuzzFeed obit

Arlene Violet misses the issue on teacher evaluations


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

arleneNo one connotes Rhode Island quite like Arlene Violet. She’s got the full package: the accent, the politics and the resume. She’s been a nun, a lawyer, a politician and, as a result, now she’s a political pundit. Violet is so Rhode Island she even wrote a musical about the mob.

And here’s another thing that makes Arlene Violet pretty typical of the Ocean State: she doesn’t seem to have a strong understanding about the underlying issues causing the political problems in public education.

Here’s what she wrote about Deborah Gist in last week’s Valley Breeze: “Disingenuous arguments about how she ‘disses’ educators and only has a one trick pony for evaluation of students’ achievements and teacher competencies failed to derail her.”

On Newsmakers she followed this up by adding:

“It’s just a systemic resistance, for example for teacher evaluations. After I wrote a column in supporting of your reappointment I got my usual feedback when I support you, and they talked about the Rhode Island model teacher evaluation and support system addition 2 is 100 pages written by someone who has never spent a day in the classroom…”

However, there are actual issues with the new evaluation system that incentivize, rather than discourages, the dreaded status quo (that Violet herself rails against). Specifically, that the system being used to evaluate teachers inspires mediocrity. Here’s how an actual educator at the now-famous teacher rally in Cranston very succinctly summed up the real problem with the new teacher evaluation system:

“Less rigor of task or target set to low teacher becomes highly effective; rigorous task and target and the teacher is scored effective and developing. The rating has little to do with the quality of the teaching and everything to do with the subjective development and rating of the task.”

This is why holding someone accountable is only as good as the metric being used. But this didn’t stop Arlene from pretty much ignoring any criticism at all and skipping right over to educators being lazy. “First of all I’d like you to respond to that criticism, but putting that aside,” she asked Gist, “do you feel that anyone will ever accept teacher evaluations or is this just ‘don’t bother me?'”

She may as well have asked if teachers beat their spouses (the most famous example of a hard-to-answer leading question in journalism)! WPRI had no counterbalance to Violet’s support for Gist; the panel consisted of two impartial reporters and Violet, who says on the show that she often supports Gist.

But Gist, to her credit, didn’t take the bait: “They [teachers] want to make sure the process is fair, that the process is high quality and they want to be held accountable in a way that is appropriate and fair, not that they don’t want it to happen at all, that they want to make sure the process is done well.”

EcoRI expands into Bay State, opens EcoMass

ecomassA four-year old, very green, Providence start-up business is expanding into Massachusetts. Our friends and allies over at EcoRI News are opening a second site called ecoMass News.

Massachusetts and Rhode Island share the same border and are linked by a common watershed; our economies overlap; many live in one state and work in the other, so it made sense to expand our coverage to include the Bay State,” ecoRI/ecoMass News Executive Director Frank Carini said. “Now our Massachusetts neighbors can look forward to news and features on topics such as urban farming, biking, the green economy, composting, marine stewardship and environmental justice.”

So fittingly, ecoMass News kicks off its coverage with a story headlined: “Mass. and R.I. Work Together for Mutual Benefit

Here’s the full press release about the new site:

Since 2009, ecoRI News has been the leading source of environmental news for Rhode Island. Now its fourth year, the nonprofit news organization is expanding its coverage to include Massachusetts, with the launch of ecoMass News (www.ecoMass.org), an initiative dedicated to reporting on Massachusetts environmental and social-justice news.

“Massachusetts and Rhode Island share the same border and are linked by a common watershed; our economies overlap; many live in one state and work in the other, so it made sense to expand our coverage to include the Bay State,” ecoRI/ecoMass News executive director Frank Carini said. “Now our Massachusetts neighbors can look forward to news and features on topics such as urban farming, biking, the green economy, composting, marine stewardship and environmental justice.”

Founded by husband-wife team Frank Carini, a veteran journalist who has worked at The Cincinnati Post, half a dozen Boston-area weeklies and The Newport Daily News, and Joanna Detz, a writer and graphic designer, ecoRI News has been
featured in the Columbia Journalism Review and is recognized by other national and regional
media organizations as a trusted source of environmental news. ecoMass News plans to grow its presence in the Bay State by employing the same grassroots efforts ecoRI News used to gain a following in Rhode Island.

“We like to think of our brand as ‘slow journalism,’ and like slow food, it takes time to grow, but ultimately it is a better and more sustainable product,” Carini said.

While the organization, which currently has four full-time employees, plans to keep its headquarters in Providence, it hopes someday to have a bureau in Boston.

PolitiFact RI once again shows right-wing bias


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

I was going to write about this this weekend, but the Huffington Post beat me to it.

PolitiFact is well-known nationally for its conservative bias. In Rhode Island, where PolitiFact has partnered with the right of center Providence Journal, this bias was recently on full display. Recently, they went after David Cicilline for saying on Newsmakers that the Social Security payroll tax is currently assessed on about 83 percent of income, down from a peak of “approximately 90 percent of the income generated in this country…which was sort of where it has been historically.”

This is true. Even PolitiFact admits that both numbers are correct. In order to justify a “mostly false” rating, they claim that Cicilline’s muttered qualifier, “sort of where it has been historically,” amounted to saying that 90 percent was the historical average, not the peak. That sort of unreasonable quibbling could arguably justify a “mostly true.” But there really is no defending a “mostly false” rating.

In fact, PolitiFact was guilty of some misleading of their own. The percentage of earnings taxed started at 92 when the program was implemented in 1937, dipped down to a low of 71 in 1965, and rose to a peak of 90 in 1982 and 1983. It has since declined to 83 percent. In their quest for a “mostly false,” PolitiFact neglected to mention the fact that the figure started at 92 percent, giving the impression that 90 percent was the all-time peak, instead of the closest the income percentage ever came to returning to its starting point.

The cap on social security taxes is one of the most regressive features of America’s tax system. To help address this, Obama added a 0.9 percentage point high-income surcharge on the Medicare tax and cut the Social Security tax by two points. Here’s what that looks like in chart form:

payrollTaxRate

Sadly, this pro-growth, highly progressive Social Security tax cut recently expired, falling victim to austerity politics.

Martyrs Wanted


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Mr.-Smith-Goes-to-WashingtonCurrent-Anchor managing editor Justin Katz has a piece somewhat worth reading (the latter half of it is mostly an extended airing of his grievances about his own failed campaign for Tiverton school committee) titled “Whose Fault, RI?” In it, Katz examines the straits the Rhode Island Republican Party finds itself in. Ultimately, Katz settles on the usual villains keeping Republicans down; RI government, Democrats, unions, the media, and conservatives’ favorite punching bag, Rhode Islanders themselves. Katz neatly encapsulates the problem early on his piece, after suggesting conservatives are a “persecuted minority” (at least politically), by asking:

So, Rhode Island, why would people martyr the parts of their lives by which they mainly express their worldviews for a political lost cause that they can avoid or escape?

Aye, there’s the rub. Here’s the thing; though some of Katz’s rhetoric mimics that of those fighting for social change, his end conclusion demonstrates why the comfortable don’t make good agents of change. See, if you actually are suffering from the unfair exertion of power over you, you organize and fight back. That’s why unions exist. To organize their workplaces to prevent the unfair application of power.

Movements to defeat entrenched power systems have always required martyrs, martyrs who could’ve sat back in comfort and privilege and refused to fight. The sort of political attacks Katz met during his run for school committee is nothing in the face of what the union, civil rights, and LGBTQ movements suffered. And yet those movements all supplied people who willingly allowed their personal lives to suffer for the sake of a “lost cause.” If you truly believe in your principles, then you must stand up and suffer the slings and arrows of those who oppose you.

That Republicans can’t find people willing to stand up for their principles is an issue, and the blame for it should be placed solely at their feet. If the Republican Party isn’t offering their candidates support and encouragement, then they are fundamentally failing at being a political party. An organized party is necessary for victory; the Democrats not only are institutionally strong, but also organizationally strong as well. NGP VAN provides a wealth of data every election to candidates, as well as providing a great set of tools for campaigning. As far as I know, Republicans have no equivalent system, though they do understand that missing piece.

The dearth of candidates, especially in the voter-rich cities, hamstrings the Republicans in other ways. First, it appears to demonstrate that Republicans are not serious about their beliefs, certainly not serious enough to challenge the Democrats politically. Speaker Gordon Fox was actually challenged from the left, not the right, in 2012. In politics and society, there are few “wake up” moments where the majority of people come around to a point of view. Rather, it takes bold leadership and fearless advocacy for your positions to create change. If Republicans cower in their living rooms, then no one hears them or understands their point of view.

Second, it eliminates a ton of data-gathering about what a successful Republican candidate should look like. Consider that the two most successful RI GOP members are Alan Fung and Scott Avedesian. Both are mayors of cities, both aren’t given to the outsized rhetoric of the more fringe conservatives, and both could be viable contenders for the Governor’s office. The RI GOP already has an existing template for what makes a good Republican candidate. Its failure to foster candidates along that template is entirely its fault.

Let’s turn towards the anti-media narrative, the idea that the media fails to cover Republicans in a way that would be beneficial to them. This is probably true; media does have a bias. However, that bias isn’t necessarily liberal. What it often is is a bias of lack of knowledge. Issues-based campaigns learn this all the time; a journalist simply cannot become an expert on your issue overnight. Figuring out how to effectively communicate with journalists and news editors needs to be a part of the Republican Party’s job. However, scapegoating the media for one’s failures hampers effective communication and damages your ability to get your message across. Like it or not, even in the digital age, the media is the best way to communicate with a wide audience rapidly.

All movements that wished to undo the way of things, that wished to challenge power and succeed, have had to sacrifice. There have always been moments of self-doubt, of wondering whether the pain and suffering was worth it. But if you think that it’s just a “lost cause”, well… I’ll let actor and Republican Party member Jimmy Stewart play us out.

Bill sponsor Malik more unbiased than WPRO news


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

RI State House 1Here’s an interesting instance of media bias: a WPRO preview story on a proposal to eliminate the state sales tax was less balanced than an op/ed in the Fall River Herald News written by the bill’s sponsor, Jan Malik.

The WPRO report uses an interview between conservative talk show host Matt Allen, a supporter of the proposal, and Mike Stenhouse, the leader of the corporate-backed think tank that initially suggested the idea to explain the legislation. There was no counter perspective in the WPRO, even though no economists support the idea.

Malik’s op/ed, on the other hand, did contained balance:

The Rhode Island Center for Freedom and Prosperity has backed the bill, while URI economist Dr. Leonard Lardaro and URI business administration professor Ed Mazze found fault with the idea.

For a little perspective on these three sources of information: Mazze and Lardaro are economists and URI business professors. The Center for Freedom and Prosperity is a corporate-funded political group that gets paid to claim that anything that shrinks government is good for the economy.

So while Malik’s op/ed doesn’t offer a lot of balance, it’s worth noting that it offers more than the local talk radio outlet that bills itself as “the Station of Record.”

John DePetro’s disdain for undocumented workers


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

When six-year old Derrick Johnson was struck and killed by a pickup truck driven by Andres Morales, the community mourned a tragic death. There is no question that the terrible event was an accident, Morales had no intention or wish to harm the boy. Perhaps the accident was preventable, perhaps not, but the case has taken on a special significance in the minds of some because the driver of the pick-up was an undocumented worker who apparently had no license.

John DePetro, the noisome talk radio show host, made a big deal back in November over Governor Chafee’s idea of giving undocumented immigrants driver’s licenses. A bill to allow this is slowly making its way through the General Assembly. Somehow, in a gigantic leap of illogic, DePetro has decided that Chafee bears some responsibility for the boy’s death. On his blog, DePetro writes, above a photo of the deceased boy:

Governor Gump needs to hold off on giving illegals drivers licenses.  A young American life is taken by an invader. John DePetro has protested Governor Chafee for cutting a deal to get votes in exchange for giving an illegal a drivers license . The illegals threaten they will not vote for Chafee unless they are given a Rhode Island drivers license.

DePetro’s hatred for undocumented workers is palpable and grotesque and DePetro’s revolting invective encourages his callers to respond with even greater levels of stomach-churning bile. Those who maintain a different view from DePetro are of course lambasted. Back in November DePetro allowed a caller named Raymond through and what followed was a litany of racist abuse, which DePetro yelled out as the man tried to express his opinions in heavily accented English. DePetro said:

“We have turkey on Thanksgiving, not stuffed pigeons, the illegals Thanksgiving.”

“You are going to learn our customs!”

“This is our land. No el drive-o on our road-o.”

Talking about a rally at the State House, DePetro said that undocumented workers “should have been there to clean the State House and that’s it.”

“I have a problem with you people on the road. No more loose donkeys on Broad St.”

DePetro’s hate has unhinged him. Diving, or rather belly-flopping into the Boston Bombing story and the local connection to Tamerlain Tsarnaev’s wife, Katherine Russell, DePetro has made a spurious and unfounded connection between “illegals” and terrorists,  scrawling on his blog, “Governor Chafee wanted to roll out the red carpet to everyone and it looks like it is working. Terrorist (sic) and illegals are flocking to Rhode Island.”

That DePetro’s radio show is a cesspool of hate is not a source of shame but a point of pride for the man. His website is full of pictures that attempt to depict undocumented workers as scary non-white “others” in order to appeal to the basest prejudices of his listeners, and smear Governor Chafee:

image-1

image-2

image
And yet, DePetro still maintains, despite his hate for and vilification of undocumented workers, that he is a Catholic. Saccharine piety drips from DePetro’s tongue with same same thickness and intensity as the hateful bile he spews against those who are not like him, and the Catholic Church not only says nothing, they actively support him. Bishop Thomas Tobin of the Providence Diocese is a not infrequent guest. Father Bernard Healey, the Providence Diocese’s chief lobbyist to the General Assembly, appeared at DePetro’s Odeum event in East Greenwich.

The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), in “Welcoming the Stranger Among Us: Unity in Diversity” have written the official Catholic teaching on immigration.

We recognize that nations have the right to control their borders. We also recognize and strongly assert that all human persons, created as they are in the image of God, possess a fundamental dignity that gives rise to a more compelling claim to the conditions worthy of human life. Accordingly, the Church also advocates legalization opportunities for the maximum number of undocumented persons, particularly those who have built equities and otherwise contributed to their communities.

The Maryland Catholic Conference has boiled the church’s teaching to seven basic precepts.

All people have a right to have their basic human needs met in their homelands.

If their basic needs cannot be met in their homelands, persons have the right to seek them abroad.

The right to migrate is not absolute and can be mitigated in favor of the common good.

Nations may regulate borders to provide for national security, tranquility and prosperity.

The right to regulate borders is not absolute and regulations must promote the common good.

Nations with the ability to accommodate migrants should respond with generosity.

Families have the right to remain united.

Nowhere in these statements is there hate. Nowhere in these statements are immigrants unfairly associated with terrorism, or are those who seek to help undocumented workers implicated in vehicular homicide. Instead, there are calls for generosity and an appeal to the common good.

John DePetro is a a terrible Christian. Mouthing platitudes does not make someone a decent human being. Showing compassion and understanding, actions apparently outside DePetro’s skill set, does.

And once again the Providence Diocese, under the direction of Bishop Thomas Tobin, has failed to be any kind of a moral leader. In supporting DePetro the diocese has once more abandoned its commitment to protect those in need.

Patch abandons community journalism business model


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

patchThere’s been a lot of changes at Patch, the network of local news websites, since I left the company two years ago.

Back then, the AOL-owned company was launching new sites nationwide with reckless abandon. It preached the gospel of community journalism and prided itself on outfitting its editors with tools and resources to cover their towns. It was a fun place to work and morale among my co-workers was very high.

Now all that has changed. For the worse.

When I worked there, Patch employed 19 full-time journalists to staff 15 sites in Rhode Island. Each site had a healthy freelance budget and a part-time community editor. Now, there are only 10 full-time journalists working for the 15 local sites; freelance budgets and community editors have been eliminated altogether.

And as of today, Patch’s initial business model of having one editor dedicated to a community is gone too.

Every local editor in Rhode Island is now responsible for multiple sites. This has been happening through attrition for about a year, but Patch in RI is undergoing a big reshuffle this week.

Many local employees have been discussing the changes on social networks, but to my knowledge there has been no formal announcement from the company. Suffice to say, the folksy pictures of local editors at the top of each site now have little to no relationship to the reality of the staffing situation anymore.

Patch invested heavily in Rhode Island when it needed to develop an audience. Now that it is a known commodity, the company is dramatically scaling back. Employees are being given fewer resources and are expected to produce more results. Many openly complain about their jobs and their community on Facebook. Sales staff is gaining influence over editorial decisions.

This isn’t the model for community journalism, this is the model for corporate journalism.

RI state of mind and misleading headlines

Child experiencing brain freeze“Rhode Island Most Miserable State” said numerous articles, as Gallup released its latest polling for the Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index on stress levels and enjoyment in various states. The problem with the headline is that it misrepresented the data Gallup provided, which can be seen here.

Sadly, The Providence Journal mistakenly reported that Rhode Island was not only the most miserable state, but under the headline “Rhode Islanders say they’re sad” mistakenly claimed “in Rhode Island, 80.4 percent of those asked said they did not enjoy themselves.” In actuality, 80.4% of Rhode Island claimed they’d experienced feelings of enjoyment that day before being polled. The online version, though the numbers are correct there (the online version chose the equally misleading headline of “Gallup poll: Little pleasure, lots of stress in Rhode Island”), claims Rhode Islanders described this state as “boring” and called Rhode Island residents “depressed”.

WPRO chose to play the survey with this tweet (and the story suggested Rhode Islanders move to Hawaii):

So here’s the thing, despite the agreement of WPRO and The Providence Journal, the data doesn’t back that conclusion up at all. That’s a falsity. The poll actually shows that about 4 out 5 Rhode Islanders experienced enjoyment “a lot of the day” before the poll, and that about 46.3% of Rhode Islanders also reported feeling stressed the day before. By no definition is that “miserable” or “boring” or “depressed”.

In comparison, Hawaii found roughly 9 out of 10 its residents had experienced enjoyment the day before and only 32.1% had experienced feelings of stress.

Does the survey show Rhode Island reports that it experienced the least enjoyment the day before the poll? Yes. But low-population states like Rhode Island and Hawaii had such small sample sizes that there’s 4 point margin of error, which does need to be considered, especially since this was a survey that was ranked based on fractions of a percent (so we’re about last, and Hawaii is about first). It’s also worth pointing out slightly less than 20% of Rhode Islanders failed to say they’d experienced positive feelings “a lot of the day”.

Only the worst cynic could describe that as “miserable” or suggest that Rhode Islanders think their state is boring, and Gallup, to its credit, never does. Gallup gives a very nuanced discussion about stress and enjoyment:

Rhode Island residents were the least likely to report feeling enjoyment the previous day, at 80.4%, although that is still high on an absolute basis. Residents in other high-stress states, Kentucky and West Virginia, were also among the least likely to experience enjoyment… Utah is unique in that it is routinely ranked among both the highest stress and highest enjoyment states, appearing among the top five in enjoyment in 2008, 2011, and 2012, suggesting a complex relationship between stress and other emotions.

Nationally, 84.9% of Americans reported feeling enjoyment “yesterday” in 2012. States with relatively lower enjoyment levels, below 84%, were primarily clustered in the Northeast and South, but also included Ohio. The states where enjoyment was higher than 86% were located mainly in the Midwest and West, including Hawaii and Alaska.

It’s important that we get these sorts of articles right, because when we place these under misleading headlines and give erroneous details or make wisecracks about these results in the article body, the public is being lied to. What we’re going to see is the people who consistently bash this state using these articles to prove their point of “Rhode Island sucks”, even though the study itself doesn’t support them. I can almost guarantee there will be a political mailer that cites The Journal article in 2014.

It’s really not surprising to me that given the 38 Studios collapse, Hurricane Sandy, continued high unemployment and the relentless slog of dreary headlines and editorials that less than half of Rhode Islanders feel stressed. What is great about this survey is that the average Rhode Island resident is a pretty upbeat person. There’s an obscene minority that really hates this state and doesn’t hesitate to tell us that, but it turns out that the overwhelming majority of Rhode Islanders enjoy their lives. Even though Hawaiians experience 30.67% less stress than Rhode Island, they only experience 11.57% more enjoyment. As Rhode Islanders, we may occasionally feel stressed, but we know how to enjoy ourselves, too. Fuck yeah, Rhode Island.


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387